Neutron star low-mass X-ray binaries Rudy Wijnands Anton Pannekoek Institute for Astronomy...
Transcript of Neutron star low-mass X-ray binaries Rudy Wijnands Anton Pannekoek Institute for Astronomy...
Neutron star low-mass X-ray binaries
Rudy WijnandsAnton Pannekoek Institute for Astronomy
University of Amsterdam
3 August 2015 Lorentz center, Leiden
Low- versus high-mass X-ray binaries
• Low-mass X-ray binaries– Traditional: companion has a mass of <1 solar mass – More accurate: Mcompanion < Maccretor
– Mass transfer through Roche-lobe overflow (but not always)– Accretor can be a neutron star or a black hole
• For BH-LMXBs see talk by Tomsick
• High-mass X-ray binaries– Traditional: Mcompanion >10 Msolar
– Mass transfer not through Roche-lobe overflow• Wind accretion• Accretion from circumstellar decretion disk
– See talk by Sidoli
NS-LMXBs
Roche-lobe overflowTypically main sequence or white dwarf companionTypically low magnetic field neutron star
Symbiotic NS LMXBs
Strong stellar wind from low-mass red giant companionTypically high magnetic field neutron starSimilar physics as in the wind accreting HMXBs?
E.g., see short review of Postnov et al. 2010
Different ways to classify neutron-star LMXBs
• Persistent versus transient LMXBs• Correlated spectral and variability behavior
– Z versus Atoll sources– >1% LEdd
• Pulsars versus non-pulsating sources– Symbiotic LMXBs– AMXPs, including the tMSPs
• Luminosity classes• All classifications are closely linked!
Persistent and transient LMXBs• Most low-mass X-ray binaries are not always visible• They are usually very dim no or very little accretion of matter
– See talk by Degenaar
• They become occasionally very bright huge (>104-6) increase in accretion rate– Outbursts due to instabilities in the disk
• During outbursts they behave like the persistent sources
RX
TE
/AS
M li
ght c
urve
s
Accretion spectra in NS-LMXBs• Complex subject and no consensus about what
can be inferred from the accretion spectra– Neutron star properties– Accretion physics
• Similar hard and soft
states as BH transients
Bouchacourt et al. 1984
Broad band spectral analysis • Often limitation on the X-ray data
– Only limited energy resolution– Often limited number of photons
• Use broad-band spectral analysis– Good: model independent– Bad: instrument dependent
• Basic Z-Atoll classification in LMXBs– Correlated X-ray spectral and X-ray timing behavior
• Hasinger & van der Klis 1989
– Note: often non-experts only focus on the X-ray spectral behavior but forget the rapid X-ray variability part
X-ray colors
Neutron star
Corona
Disk
Corona
Neutron star
Soft state
Hard state
Soft color (SC) = B/AHard color (HC) = C/B
Plot HC versus SC • Color-color diagram (CD)
Plot HC versus Lx
• Hardness-intensity diagram (HID)
No standard bands!
A B C
After Lin et al. 2010
CCD evolution of XTE J1701-462
First ever transient Z source!Difference between Z and atoll sources is in long-term Mdot!
(note: rapid X-ray variability properties support this)
Homan et al. 2007
Accreting X-ray pulsars• Most NS-LMXBs do not pulsate• A dozen or so are slow pulsars
– Four odd-balls • GRO J1744-28 (0.47 s), 2A 1822-371 (0.59 s), Her X-1 (1.24 s),
4U 1626-67 (7.66 s)
– Rest are very slow rotators: the symbiotic NS-LMXBs Postnov et al. 2010
Accreting millisecond X-ray pulsars• ~10% of the NS-LMXBs are AMXPs
– Spin frequency mostly > 100 Hz– Also including Terzan 5 X-2 that has a spin frequency 11 Hz
• All AMXPs are transient– Although HETE J1900.1-2455 is a quasi-persistent source– Most AMXPs are not bright in outburst
• One ‘classical’ AMXP is millisecond radio pulsar– M28I– Also called transitional millisecond pulsars (see talk Archibald)
• How do the other tMSPs fit in?– Accreting phase has Lx that resemble quiescent NS-LMXBs
Luminosity classes
Class Lx
(2-10 keV)
Comments
Very bright >1038 erg s-1
> 50% LEdd
• Z sources• Cyg like are brighter than Sco like
Bright 1037-38 erg s-1
~10-50% LEdd
• Atoll sources• GX Atoll sources are the brightest• AMXPs fall in this class although most are faint at peak of outburstFaint 1036-37 erg s-1
~1-10% LEdd
Very faint 1034-36 erg s-1
~0.01-1% LEdd
• Also called sub-luminous LMXBs• See talk by Heinke
Quiescence <1034 erg s-1 <0.01% LEdd
• Very low level accretion or no accretion at all (see talk by Degenaar)• Most tMSPs
Arbitrary, inspired by observations!
Note the energy range used
All classes contain transients and persistent sources
~
Some open problems• What causes the tracks in Z and Atoll sources?• Transient/persistent behavior still hardly understood• Sub-luminous X-ray binaries not understood• Why only 10% of NS-LMXBs are AMXPs?
– Do non-pulsating NS-LMXBs have no B field?
• How do tMSP fit in?– New way to probe very low accretion rates– Where are the bright outbursts?
• Selection effect?
• What phenomena are only accretion related and which are also influenced by the nature of the compact object?