Neutrino physics : The future
description
Transcript of Neutrino physics : The future
Neutrino physics: The future
Gabriela Barenboim
TAU04
We know that neutrinos are massive and oscillate !
e
Pure e source
Evidence for flavor change
Solar neutrinos: Compelling evidence
e + +
e
= 13
Reactor neutrinos: very strong evidence
One pair of parameters fits both solar and reactor data
produced
surviving
reactor
detector180 km
e 0.6 e
Atmospheric neutrinos: Compelling evidence
detector
Earth
(up)
(down)
The hypothesis with one pair of parameters fits both the atmospheric and accelerator data
Expect 106 events
in far detector Observe 72
events
Accelerator neutrinos: interesting evidence
LSND: unconfirmed evidence
We do not know how many neutrino mass eigenstates
there are.
Assuming CPT, confirmation of LSND by MiniBooNE
would imply there are more than 3
What have we already learnt ?
Neutrinos Required m2
solar - reactor 10-(4-5)
atmos.- accelerator 10-3
LSND 1
eV2
solar - reactor 10-(4-5) atmos.- accelerator 10-3
LSND 1
For only three neutrinos
m2=(m32-m2
2) + (m22-m1
2) +
(m12-m3
2) =0
How many neutrino species are there ?
Do sterile neutrinos exist ?
How many neutrino species are there ?
Do sterile neutrinos exist ?
Let´s assume there are only three neutrinos
The neutrino mixing matrix
The unknown oscillation parameters
What is the size of sin2(213) ?
Is there CP violation ?
What is the mass hierarchy ?
What is the sign of m213 ?
We determined that m(KL) > m(KS) by
Passing kaons through matter (regenerator)
Beating the unknown sign[m(KL) –m(KS)] against the known sign[reg. ampl.]
We determined that m(KL) > m(KS) by
Passing kaons through matter (regenerator)
Beating the unknown sign[m(KL) –m(KS)] against the known sign[reg. ampl.]
We will determine the sign(m213) by
Passing neutrinos through matter (Earth)
Beating the unknown sign(m213) against the
known sign[forward e e e e ampl]
How we are going to do it ?
Method 1: accelerator experiments
Appearance experiment e
Measurement of e and e yields 13 and
Matter effects present, baselines of O(100-1000 km)
The off axis idea
By going off axis, the beam energy is reduced
and the spectrum becomes very sharp.
Allows an experiments to pick an energy for the maximum oscillation
length.
.Minakata and Nunokawa
What will we get ?
.Minakata and Nunokawa
What will we get ?
Method 2: reactor experiments
Disappearance experiment e x
Clean measurement of 13
No matter effects, baselines O(1 km)
Reactor experiments : the future
Reactor experiments : the future
detector 1
detector 2
R. McKeown
What is the absolute mass scale ?
mass(heavy)
What is the absolute mass scale ?
.04 eV < mass(heavy)
m2atm
What is the absolute mass scale ?
.04 eV < mass(heavy) < .23 eV
m2atm
WMAP + 2dFRS + other data
mi < .71 eV
B
c
h
m
xe
….
M.Tegmark
M.Tegmark
.04 eV < mass(heavy) < .40 eV
m2atm
If the primordial power spectrum
does not have the usually assumed
shape, mi < 1.2 eV
What is the absolute mass scale ?
phase space determines energy spectrumtransition energy E0 = Ee + En (+ recoil corrections)
experimental observable
– decay kinematics
-3 -2 -1 0 Ee-E0 [eV]
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
rel.
rate
[a.u
.]
theoretical spectrum near endpoint
m = 0eV
m = 1eV
dN/dE = K × F(E,Z) × p × Etot × (E0-Ee) × [ (E0-Ee)2 – m2 ]1/2
phase space determines energy spectrumtransition energy E0 = Ee + En (+ recoil corrections)
experimental observable
– decay kinematics
-3 -2 -1 0 Ee-E0 [eV]
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
rel.
rate
[a.u
.]
theoretical spectrum near endpoint
m = 0eV
m = 1eV
dN/dE = K × F(E,Z) × p × Etot × (E0-Ee) × [ (E0-Ee)2 – m2 ]1/2
NOT me
m Uei2mi2
i1
3
5
KATRIN sensitivity & discovery potential
m < 0.2eV (90%CL)
m = 0.35eV (5)
m = 0.3eV (3)
sensitivity
discovery potential
expectation:
after 3 full beam years syst ~ stat
What kind of particle is the neutrino ?
What kind of particle is the neutrino ?
Is the neutrino a truly neutral particle ?
Why not add a Dirac mass term ?
m L R
Why not add a Dirac mass term ?
m L R
This requires R. Then no (SM) principle prevents the occurrence
of
M CR
R
cLL L Lm
Majorana mass
Dirac mass LR L Rm (conserves L)
cRR R RM
from Yukawa couplings
(violates L)
CP conjugate of left-handed
neutrino
Right-handed neutrinos
Complete See-Saw Mechanism
1I I TLL LL LR RR LRm m m M m
cLL L Lm
I I cLL LR Lc
L R TRLR RR
m m
m M
Dirac matrix
Heavy Majorana matrix
Light Majorana matrix
Diagonalise to give effective mass
Type II contribution
Type I see-saw mechanism Type II see-saw mechanism
R
LL
2
I I c uLL L L
vm Y
M
Types of see-saw mechanism
L L
Heavy triplet
cRR R RM
1I TLL LR RR LRm m M m
Y
Naturalness may be over rated …
Do this look natural ??
How we can find out ?
x
p
p
n
n
e
e
SM double weak process
4 body decay: continuos spectrum for the e energy sum
How we can find out ?
x
p
p
n
n
e
e
SM double weak process
4 body decay: continuos spectrum for the e energy sum
x
p
p
n
n
e
e
Only allowed for Majorana
2 body decay: e energy sum is a delta
i is emitted ( RH + O(mi/E) LH )
Amp[i contribution] mi
Amp[0] | mi Uei2|
x
p
n
n
e
e
i is emitted ( RH + O(mi/E) LH )
Amp[i contribution] mi
Amp[0] | mi Uei2|
x
p
n
n
e
e
effective neutrino mass
m=| mi Uei2|
Cosmology
Beta decay
Oscillations
Double-beta decaym Uei
2mi
i1
3
i
mij2 m j
2 mi2
m Uei2mi2
i1
3
m1 m2 m3
“Unexpected” properties
Finite lifetime
Lorentz non-invariance
Magnetic moment
CPT non-invariance
SummaryWe have learned that neutrinos have masses.
But we do not know
How many species there are
How much the neutrinos weigh
Whether =
We have discovered that two mixing angles are large.
But we do not know
The size of the crucial third angle
Whether oscillations violate CP
The spectral pattern
Do not miss the neutrino talk at
TAU09 !!!