Neutrino Factory scenarios

21
Alain Blondel Neutrino Factory scenarios I will endeavour to address some principle design issues related to the physics use of high intensity muon beams. Some ideas will be given. 1. intense muon beams in neutrino factory complex. (CERN model) 2. neutrino factory parameters.

description

Neutrino Factory scenarios. I will endeavour to address some principle design issues related to the physics use of high intensity muon beams. Some ideas will be given. 1. intense muon beams in neutrino factory complex. (CERN model) 2. neutrino factory parameters. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Neutrino Factory scenarios

Page 1: Neutrino Factory scenarios

Alain Blondel

Neutrino Factory scenarios

I will endeavour to address some principle design issues related to the physics use of high intensity muon beams. Some ideas will be given.

1. intense muon beams in neutrino factory complex. (CERN model) 2. neutrino factory parameters.

Page 2: Neutrino Factory scenarios

Alain Blondel

High Intensity Low Energy muon beams

1. Thin inner target in proton accumulator advantages: very efficient use of proton beam, point source difficulties: - can target take the heat? - creates high-radiation area inside ring 20 - 120

PSI already has 1 MW DC beam of 590 MeV protons with 5%I target for muons. How can one do 1000 times better?

2. Or Use full DC SPL 24 MW with thin muon target

DC beams (e, eee)

20

+ solenoid collection (1/.16)2 =40+ better experiments ?

Pulsed beam (e-1. Use proton beam from buncher2. Use muons at the end of cooling channel!

--> need now conceptual design of target station and muon beams

Page 3: Neutrino Factory scenarios

Alain Blondel

Thoughts for muon targets in neutrino factory complex

1. Use SPL pulsed beam (3ms at 50 Hz) and thin transmission target2. Use beam stored in

accumulator and inner target

2. Use cooled muon beam ?

1. Use bunched proton beam (train of 2.3 s , 12 bunches of 10 ns each at 40 MHz)

Page 4: Neutrino Factory scenarios

Alain Blondel

Page 5: Neutrino Factory scenarios

Alain Blondel

From neutrino factory to Higgs collider

h (115) Upgrade to 57.5 GeV

Separate & , add transfer lines

More cooling + E/E reduction

Muon collider: a small…. but dfficult ring

Page 6: Neutrino Factory scenarios

Alain Blondel

Neutrino Factory parameters

Energy Intensityring geometryrunning mu+ and mu- at the same time

Page 7: Neutrino Factory scenarios

Alain Blondel

Energy

The sensitivity to 13 is a steep function of energy:

-- signal event rate increases like E

-- background in wrong sign muons decreases fast with E

The sensitivity to CP violation is not, energies >30 GeV do not contribute significantly to the sensitivity *->

The e channel is essential

threshold at 3.5 GeV and full efficiency at 15 GeV

The matter resonance is essential (12 GeV)

=> <E = 3/4 E= 15 GeV ==> E>~ 20 GeV…

Page 8: Neutrino Factory scenarios

Alain Blondel

Detector

Iron calorimeter Magnetized

Charge discrimination B = 1 T

R = 10 m, L = 20 m Fiducial mass = 40 kT

Baseline

3500 Km

732 Km 3.5 x 107

1.2 x 106

5.9 x 107

2.4 x 106

1.1 x 105

1.0 x 105

CC e CC signal (sin2 13=0.01)

Events for 1 year

Also: L Arg detector: magnetized ICARUS Wrong sign muons, electrons, taus and NC evts *->

CF e signalat J-PARC=40

Page 9: Neutrino Factory scenarios

Alain Blondel

CP violation

Matter effect must be subtracted. spectrum of matter effect and CP violation is differentIt is important to subtract in bins of measured energy. knowledge of spectrum is essential here!

5-10 GeV

10-20 GeV20-30 GeV

30-40 GeV40-50 GeV

40 kton L M D 50 GeV nufact5 yrs 2.1020/yr

In fact, 20-30 GeV is enough!

Best distance is 2500-3500 km

Page 10: Neutrino Factory scenarios

Alain Blondel

Intensity of muons in Neutrino factory storage ring

As high as possiblei.e. >1014 per second

Page 11: Neutrino Factory scenarios

Alain Blondel

muon polarization: triangle or bow-tie? For a race track or triangle decay ring, in which polarization precesses it is possible to calibrate beamenergy and energy spread with g-2 precession measurement

A bow-tie has been suggested to avoid this spin precession and depolarization (net bend is zero, so muon polarization does not precess either)

This has several inconvenients: -- P is different for the three straights in triangle (who shall be pleased?)-- P cannot be reversed-- E and E) can no longer be measured-- in order to know the flux to 0.1% on must know P to 0.1% andthis is hard! end of the bow tie.

Page 12: Neutrino Factory scenarios

Alain Blondel

CERN baseline scenario

Page 13: Neutrino Factory scenarios

Alain Blondel

-- Neutrino Factory --CERN layout

e+ e

_

interacts

giving

oscillates e

interacts giving

WRONG SIGN MUON

1016p/s

1.2 1014 s =1.2 1021 yr

3 1020 eyr

3 1020 yr

0.9 1021 yr

Page 14: Neutrino Factory scenarios

Alain Blondel

Angular divergence

If the muons have transverse momentum comparable to that of muon decay (50 MeV) the neutrino beam will be seriously degraded

this corresponds to = 0.5 m /E

Page 15: Neutrino Factory scenarios

Alain Blondel

Page 16: Neutrino Factory scenarios

Alain Blondel

Divergence of 0.1/ keeps 95% of the original flux. Straight section with this property were designed for the US Study II and by Keil

Divergence MUST be measured. A gas Cerenkov device to measure the beam emittance was devised by Piteira. Various efects were considered (optical aberrations, heating of gas, multiple scattering,etc…and concluded that the divergence is easier to measure the bigger it is so that this should not be a problem)

Page 17: Neutrino Factory scenarios

Alain Blondel

Main parameters to MONITOR 1. Total number of muons circulating in the ring, BCT, near detector for purely leptonic processes 2. muon beam polarisation, polarimeter 3. muon beam energy and energy spread, race-track or triangle. NO BOW-TIE! +polarimeter 4. muon beam angle and angular divergence. straight section design +beam divergence monitors e.g. Cerenkov 5. Theory of decay, including radiative effects OK

Yes, we believe that the neutrino flux can be monitored to 10-3 IF + design of accelerator foresees sufficient diagnostics. + quite a lot of work to do to design and simulate these diagnostics.

Conclusions I

Page 18: Neutrino Factory scenarios

Alain Blondel

Injecting two polarities

RF phase rotation and linear cooling channel work for both signs of muons (and rings also with adequate separate injection/ejection lines)

this opens the possibility to double the flux by running mu+ and mu- at the same time, but the detector must be able to identify them by timing.

The detectors can presumably identify by timing the source of events at the level of 100ns (number to be refined) i.e. 30 m. mu+ and mu- microbunches from 200 MHz RF (2.5 ns) cannot be separated.

This requires some design gymnastics for the injection in the storage ring and its geometry.

Page 19: Neutrino Factory scenarios

Alain Blondel

ll-

l+

ex: race track geometry:constraint:

¦l- - l+¦ > l +

where is the precision

of the experiments time tag

Muons of both signs circulate in opposite directions in the same ring. The two straight sections point to the same far detector(s). OK

There is one inconvenient with this: the fact that there are two decay lines implies two near detectors.

In addition this does not work for the triangle.

this can be solved by

dog bone ortwo rings with one or more common straights

Page 20: Neutrino Factory scenarios

Alain Blondel

ll-

l+

Lthis requires more arcs and possibly more tunnel

I am sure part of this can be solved(rings could be on top of each other)

's

's

's

Page 21: Neutrino Factory scenarios

Alain Blondel