Neurogenic Bladder
-
Upload
willow-mullins -
Category
Documents
-
view
78 -
download
2
description
Transcript of Neurogenic Bladder
Neuroanatomy of VoidingFrontal lobe
Micturition centerSends inhibitory signals
Pons (Pontine Micturition Center)Excitatory centerCoordinates urinary sphincters and the bladder
Spinal cordIntermediary between upper and lower control
Peripheral Nervous SystemSomatic (S2-S4)
Pudendal nerves Excitatory to external
sphincter
Parasympathetic (S2-S4)Pelvic nerves
Excitatory to bladder, relaxes sphincter
Sympathetic (T10-L2)Hypogastric nerves to
pelvic ganglia Inhibitory to bladder,
excitatory to urethra
Normal VoidingSNS primarily controls bladder and the IUS
Bladder increases capacity but not pressureInternal urinary sphincter to remain tightly closedParasympathetic stimulation inhibited
Somatics (pudendal N) regulateExternal urinary sphincterPelvic diaphragm
PNSImmediately prior to PNS stimulation, SNS is
suppressedStimulates detrusor to contractPudendal nerve is inhibited external sphincter opens
facilitation of voluntary urination
Pathophysiology of VoidingBrain lesion above pons destroys master
control centerStroke (35%)Brain tumor (24%).Hydrocephalus (22%).CP (35%).Mental retarted (50%)Basal ganglia pathology (40%)
Result : urge incontinence. night incontinence. coordinated sphincter
Pathophysiology of VoidingSpinal cord.
Spinal cord lesion (95%).Myelomeningocele (50%DSD).Multiple Sclerosis (70%).
Result: Detrusor hyperreflexia &
spastic bladder. Detrusor Sphincteric Dyssynergia. Some: Areflexic bladder
Pathophysiology of VoidingLumbosacral spinal lesion
Spinal tumor.Herniated disc (50%).Lumbar laminectomy (50%).Radical hysterectomy.Pelvic traumaResult – areflexic bladder
HistoryGeneral historySpecific history
Urinary historyBowel history:Sexual historyNeurological history
InvestigationUrinalysisBlood chemistryVoiding diaryResidual urine (UFM).Quantification of urine loss by pad testing if
appropriateUrinary tract imaging studiesUrodynamic study.
Finding at UrodynamicFilling phase
Hyposensitivity or hypersensitivityVegetative sensationsLow complianceHigh capacity bladderDetrusor overactivity, spontaneous or
provokedSphincter acontractility.
Finding at UrodynamicVoiding phase
Detrusor acontractilityDSDNon-relaxing urethraNon-relaxing bladder neck
GUIDELINES FOR URODYNAMICS AND URO-NEUROPHYSIOLOGYUrodynamic investigation is necessary to document the
dysfunction of the LUT (A).The recording of a bladder diary is advisable (B).Non-invasive testing is mandatory before invasive
urodynamics is planned (A).Video-urodynamics is the gold standard for invasive
urodynamics in patients with NLUTD. If this is available, then a filling cystometry continuing into a pressure flow study should be performed (A).
A physiological filling rate and body-warm saline must be used (A).
Specific uro-neurophysiological tests are elective procedures (C).
Treatment Priority
1. Protection of the upper urinary tract2. Improvement of urinary continence3. Restoration of (parts of) the LUT function4. Improvement of the patient’s quality of life.
Goal of TreatmentIn patients with high detrusor pressure
(detrusor overactivity, low detrusor compliance, DSD, other causes of bladder outlet obstruction).
Aim to conversion high-pressure bladder into a passive low-pressure reservoir despite the resulting residual urine.
Non-invasive Conservative TreatmentAssisted bladder emptying, Credé, Valsalva.Lower urinary tract rehabilitation
Behavioural modification techniques Pelvic floor muscle exercises Pelvic floor electrostimulation Biofeedback
Drug treatment Anticholinergic agents Phosphodiesterase inhibitors, desmopressin. Cholinergic drugs (bethanechol chloride). Alpha-blockers. Increasing bladder outlet resistance (no puplish).
Electrical neuromodulationExternal appliances
GUIDELINES FOR NON-INVASIVE CONSERVATIVE TREATMENTThe first aim of any therapy is the protection
of the upper urinary tract.The mainstay of treatment for overactive
detrusor is anticholinergic drug therapy (A)Lower urinary tract rehabilitation may be
effective in selected cases.Condom catheter or pads may reduce urinary
incontinence to a socially acceptable situation.Any method of assisted bladder emptying
should be used with the greatest caution (A).
Minimal Invasive TreatmentCatheterizationIntravesical drug treatmentIntravesical electrostimulationBotulinum toxin injections in the bladderBladder neck and urethral procedures
Botulinum toxin sphincter injectionBalloon dilatationSphincterotomyStentsBladder neck incision Increasing bladder outlet resistance
GUIDELINES FOR CATHETERIZATIONIntermittent catheterization is the standard treatment
for patients who are unable to empty their bladder (A).Patients should be well instructed in the technique
and risks of IC.Aseptic IC is the method of choice (B).The catheter size should be 12-14 Fr (B).The frequency of IC is 4-6 times per day (B).The bladder volume should remain below 400 mL (B).Indwelling transurethral and suprapubic
catheterization should be used only exceptionally, under close control, and the catheter should be changed frequently. Silicone catheters are preferred and should be changed every 2-4 weeks, while (coated) latex catheters need to be changed every 1-2 weeks. (A).
GUIDELINES FOR MINIMAL INVASIVE TREATMENTBotulinum toxin injection in the detrusor is
the most effective minimally invasive treatment to reduce neurogenic detrusor overactivity (A).
Sphincterotomy is the standard treatment for DSD (A).
Bladder neck incision is effective in a fibrotic bladder neck (B).
Surgical TreatmentUrethral and bladder neck procedures
Urethral slingArtificial urinary sphincterFunctional sphincter augmentation (gracilis m)Bladder neck and urethra reconstruction (Extrophy)
Detrusor myectomy (auto-augmentation)Denervation, deafferentation, neurostimulation,
neuromodulationBladder covering by striated muscle (rectus m)Bladder augmentation or substitutionUrinary diversion (continent diversion,
incontinent diversion)
GUIDELINES FOR SURGICAL TREATMENTDetrusor
Overactive Detrusor myectomy is an acceptable option for the
treatment of overactive bladder when more conservative approaches have failed. It is limited invasive and has minimal morbidity (B).
- Sacral rhizotomy with SARS in complete lesions and sacral neuromodulation in incomplete lesions are effective treatments in selected patients (B).
Bladder augmentation is an acceptable option for decreasing detrusor pressure whenever less invasive procedures have failed. For the treatment of a severely thick or fibrotic bladder wall, a bladder substitution might be considered (B).
GUIDELINES FOR SURGICAL TREATMENTDetrusor
Underactive SARS with rhizotomy and sacral neuromodulation
are effective in selected patients (B). Restoration of a functional bladder by covering with
striated muscle is still experimental (4).
GUIDELINES FOR SURGICAL TREATMENTUrethra
Overactive (DSD): like minimal invasive treatment
Underactive The placement of a urethral sling is an established
procedure (B). The artificial urinary sphincter is very effective (B). Transposition of the gracilis muscle is still
experimental (Level of evidence: 4).
ReferanceEuropean Association of Urology 2010
M. Stöhrer, B. Blok, D. Castro-Diaz, E. Chartier-Kastler, G. Del Popolo, G. Kramer, J. Pannek, P. Radziszewski, J-J. Wyndaele