neospora and besniotia
-
Upload
morka-amante -
Category
Documents
-
view
606 -
download
1
Transcript of neospora and besniotia
ADDIS ABABA UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF VETERINARY MEDICINES AND AGRICULTURE
DEPARTMENT OF PARASITOLOGY AND PATHOLOGY
TROPICAL VETERINARY PROTOZOOLOGY
REVIEW ON PROTOZOAN PARASITE OF NEOSPORA AND BESNIOTIA
By:
MORKA AMANTE
May 3 , 2015
Bishoftu, Ethiopia
I
TABLE OF CONTENT
Contents page TABLE OF CONTENT.................................................................................................................I
AKNOWELEDGEMENT............................................................................................................II
1. INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................1
2. NEOSPORA...............................................................................................................................2
2.1 Etiology and life cycle..........................................................................................................2
2.2 Host range.............................................................................................................................2
2.3 Epidemiology........................................................................................................................3
2.3.1 prevalence reported in Ethiopia.................................................................................................3
2.4 Transmission.........................................................................................................................4
2.5 Risk factor of the diseases...................................................................................................4
2.6 Pathogenesis..........................................................................................................................5
2.7 Clinical findings...................................................................................................................5
2.8. Economic importance of the diseases................................................................................6
2.8.1 Effects on production.................................................................................................................6
2.9 Diagnosis...............................................................................................................................7
2.10 control and prevention of niosporiosis...........................................................................7
3. BESNOITIA...............................................................................................................................8
3.1 Etiology and life cycle.........................................................................................................8
3.2 Epidemiology.......................................................................................................................9
3.3 Pathogenesis.........................................................................................................................9
3.4 Clinical findings.................................................................................................................10
3.4.1 Bovine besnoitiosis...................................................................................................................10
3.4.2 Caprin besnoitiosis...................................................................................................................10
I
3. 5 Transmission of besnoitiosis............................................................................................10
3.6.1 Seasonality factors....................................................................................................................11
3.6.2 Age factors................................................................................................................................11
3.6.3 Sub-clinical carriers as factor..................................................................................................12
3.7 Economic and welfare impact of besniotiosis..................................................................12
3.8 Diagnosis of besnotiosis....................................................................................................12
3.9 treatment and control of besniotiosis...............................................................................13
4. REFERENCES........................................................................................................................14
II
AKNOWELEDGEMENT
I wish to sincerely express my profound thanks to Dr. Hagos Ashenafi for his motivate me to do
on this topic and explore more idea regard to the neospora and Besnoitia protozoa which are most
important protozoa of domestic animal.
III
1. INTRODUCTION
The apicomplexan protozoan Neospora spp. is an obligate intracellular parasite ( Anderson et al.,
2000), closely related to Toxoplasma gondii and Sarcocystis spp. It is a globally distributed
protozoan capable of infecting a wide variety of hosts ( Dubey, 2003). Neospora caninum is a
protozoan parasite infecting primarily dogs and cattle. Neospora caninum was first recognized in
dogs in Norway in 1984. Infection in cattle was first recognised in 1988 as causing abortion and
infertility in cattle and it is now recognised as an important cause of reproductive problems and
abortion in cattle worldwide (Haddad et al., 2005). In addition,Neospora caninum infection has
been reported as causing neurological signs in calves and dogs.
In Ethiopia, brucellosis in cattle herds has been monitored since the 1970s and abortions and
stillbirths in cattle have generally been believed to be caused by this disease. But Brucella cannot
be the only explanation for the high incidence of abortions and stillbirths, particularly in
intensively managed livestock production. To date, there has been limited knowledge about other
possible infectious agents causing reproductive disorders. Kassahun (2014) shows that the
protozoan parasite, N. caninum, is a more frequent cause of abortion and stillbirth in intensive
and semi-intensive dairy production in Ethiopia than the BVD virus and the Brucella bacterium.
The parasite was detected in brain tissue from four aborted foetuses and one calf with
congenitally defects, all born of seropositive dams. Oocysts (thick-walled spores) from N.
caninum were found in 4% of dogs living on the farms(Kassahun 2014).
Therefore bovine neosporosis can be a major explanation for the disappointing results and low
productivity of Ethiopian dairy production. In order to combat this parasite, there should be
improvements in farm level biosecurity, dog population control and waste disposal practices
(Kassahun, 2014).
1
Besnoitia spp are a protozoan blood parasite which causes skin disease in cattle. Bovine
besnoitiosis (also referred to as bovine elephantiasis and bovine anasarque) is a protozoal disease
of cattle. The first recorded cases of bovine besnoitiosis were described in southern France by
Cadéac (1884) and by Besnoit and Robin (1912) (both cited by Pols, 1960) in cattle from the
Pyrenees. Bovines act as the intermediate host in the life cycle of the causative agent: the
cystforming apicomplexan parasite Besnoitia besnoiti (Marotel, 1912). Bovine besnoitiosis is
either a severe but usually non-fatal disease of cattle, or a mild clinical disease
The severe form of besnoitiosis the is characterized during the acute phase by fever, inappetence,
hyperaemia of the skin and orchitis, which is associated with parasite proliferation (endozoytes
or tachyzoites) in endothelial cells of blood vessels. This is followed by a chronic phase,
characterized by scleroderma, hyperkeratosis, alopecia, loss of necrotic epidermis, and atrophy
and induration of the testes of bulls. This phase is associated with the development of cystozoites
(bradyzoites) in tissue cysts in the skin, mucosal membranes and the sclera and conjunctiva
(Bigalke, 1981). The mortality rate4 is low (less than 10%) but a significant percentage of
affected animals suffer loss of productivity and bulls are frequently rendered permanently
infertile (Fernandez-García et al., 2009a).
2
2. NEOSPORA
2.1 Etiology and life cycle
Niosporiosis is diseases of protozoan neospora spp which is an obligate intracellular parasite
( anderson et al., 2000), closely related to toxoplasma gondii and sarcocystis species. most
common species of veterinary importance are Neospora caninum and Neospora hughesi
Fig. 1. Life cycle of Neospora caninum.
2.2 Host range
N. caninum have dogs, coyotes and dingoes as definitive hosts, (King et al., 2010 ), and several
species of mammals, including cattle and other ruminants, canines and horses as intermediate
hosts ( Dubey et al., 2007). Additional hosts ofNeospora caninum also include other wild canids
such as foxes, with evidence of infection in goats, sheep, horses and deer, such that wildlife may
be a potential reservoir of infection (Gondim et al., 2004). However, the life cycle of Neospora
3
hughesi is not yet fully clarified, its definitive host and other intermediate hosts, besides horses,
are still unknown ( Hoane et al., 2006). Thus, it is not entirely clear how horses become infected
by this kind of Neospora.
Horses can be infected by both species of Neospora: Neospora caninum which is associated with
reproductive disease, such as abortion and neonatal mortality ( Pitel et al., 2003) andNeospora
hughesi, mainly related to cases of Equine Protozoal Myeloencephalitis (EPM) ( Vardeleon et
al., 2001). The occurrence of Neospora sp. infection in horses has already been described in
America ( Hoane et al., 2006 ), Asia ( Gupta et al., 2002), and Europe ( Ciaramella et al., 2004 ).
2.3 Epidemiology
The protozoa Neospora caninum is an important parasite that cause abortion in cattle, sheep and
goats (Gumber et al., 2002). The majority of N. caninun- positive cattle prenatally infected via
their dams. Transplacental transmission is considered the major route of transmission of N.
caninum in cattle (Schares and Conraths, 2007). In nonfatal infection in the fetus, the fetus is
born with neurologic disorder (Smith and George, 2009). N. caninum has a worldwide
distribution, the prevalence of infection in cattle and sheep approaches 100% with a lower
((Radostits et al., 2008).
2.3.1 prevalence reported in Ethiopia
This case-control study was conducted to assess the relative association of Neospora caninum
and Brucella species exposure with reproductive disorders in 2011-2011 on 731 dairy cows
sampled from 150 dairy farms in selected 17 conurbations of Ethiopia. Two hundred sixty-six of
the cows were categorized as cases based on their history of abortion or stillbirth while the
remaining 465 were controls. The presence of antibody to N. caninum was screened using
indirect ELISA, while Brucella spp. exposure was assayed serially using Rose Bengal Plate Test
and Complement Fixation Test. Exposure to N. caninum was more frequently observed among
cases (23.8%) than controls (12.7%), while no significant difference was noted for Brucella
exposure between the two groups. Moreover, the proportion of cows with disorders like retention
of fetal membrane, endometritis and increased inter-calving period were significantly higher
among Neospora seropositive cows. the finding discloses the strong association of N. caninum
4
with reproductive disorders compared to Brucella spp. exposure. However, neither N. caninum
nor Brucella spp. could explain the majority (73.2%) of the reported abortions and stillbirths in
cattle. Hence, this observation underscores the need for more intensive investigation on the
identification of causes of the aforementioned disorders in dairy cattle of
Ethiopia(Asmare ,2014).
2.4 Transmission
N. caninum infection can occur both horizontally, by the ingestion of oocysts excreted by the
definitive host, or vertically by transplacental route ( Dubey et al., 2007). In cattle, it is known
that vertical transmission is the major route of Neospora caninum transmission ( Hietala and
Thurmond, 1999), while in horses, despite the supposition that transplacental infection occurred
(Toscan et al., 2010), only recently this route of infection by Neospora hughesi has been proved (
Pusterla et al., 2011). . Experimental infection of calves by artificially contaminated milk has
also been demonstrated (Davison et al., 2001). However, the frequency, the consequences and
the importance of vertical infection in maintaining the agent in the equine population are still
unknown ( Locatelli-Dittrich et al., 2006).
As a result of the immune response generated, the tachyzoites can transform into bradyzoites (a
slowly dividing ‘dormant’ stage). They remain latent until the immune system of the cow is
suppressed, when infection then can recrudesce (Haddad et al., 2005). Bradyzoites in tissue cysts
can be consumed by dogs and then complete the life cycle of the parasite. Neospora caninum
DNA has been reported in bovine semen, which may act as another route of infection into herds
(Ferre et al., 2005).
2.5 Risk factor of the diseases
The risk factors for infection are largely unknown, although evidence suggests that close contact
of cattle with dogs and high stocking densities may be a risk factor (Schares et al., 2004). Whilst
transmission by dogs has been considered of relatively minor importance, a Dutch study showed
that seropositivity toNeospora caninum in farm dogs was strongly correlated with a high
prevalence ofNeospora caninum antibodies in the cattle. (Wouda et al., 1999). Dogs that have
close contact with cattle and that are fed raw bovine meat are at greater risk of being seropositive
5
(Kramer et al., 2004) with dairy or beef farm dogs having a much higher seroprevalence of
Neospora caninum infection compared to urban dogs (Basso et al., 2001; Antony). Management
factors or concurrent diseases that lead to immunosuppression may also be important (Reichel
and Ellis, 2002).
2.6 Pathogenesis
Definitive host: Dogs are the final host and sexual phase occur in them but, they are also
intermediate host in prenatal infections (; Matthews, 2009)
Intremediate host: Cattle are the major intermediate hosts and asexual reproduction phase occur
in them (Matthews, 2009 ). Infection can be transmitted from dam to calf in utero and
lactogenically. Infection of cattle can also occur from the ingestion of food or water
contaminated with dog feces containing Neospora caninum oocysts (Taylor et al., 2007).
Neospora caninum is a major cause of abortion in cattle, however, sporadic abortions can occur
in beef cows that have been infected congenitally (Radostits et al., 2008;).
Asexual phase has 2 stages:
1. Tachyzoites: Tachyzoites penetrate host cell like central nervous system, muscles,
macrophages and other cells, where they divide rapidly. Tachyzoites can also be transmitted
either with contaminated food and water or transplacentally to the fetus in pregnant animals.
Tissue cyst containing bradyzoites that these are found only in the nervous system. After the
asexual phase, sexual phase occur in definite host. It results in production of oocysts, which is
shed in the dog feces.
2. Tissue cysts (Taylor et al., 2007). Infection in sheep and goats is infrequently (Radostits et al.,
2008).
2.7 Clinical findings
In cattle, Neosporosis causes stillbirth, fetal resorption, mummification, abortion and decreases
in their milk production(Gumber et al., 2002). Abortions in cows are seen between 5-7 month
gestations (Gumber et al., 2002). Fetus may born alive but congenitally diseased (Radostits et al.,
2008). Neurological symptoms are different because of the widespread distribution of the
6
parasite in the central nervous system. Calves are born with neurological symptoms, which these
symptoms initially are mild but after birth become progress. In calves with neurologic
dysfunction clinical signs are included of unable to stand, unable to suckle, domed skull and
torticollis (Smith and George, 2009).
2.8. Economic importance of the diseases
2.8.1 Effects on production
Abortions in dairy cattle may be attributable to Neospora caninum although some abortions due
to Neospora may be undetected (Boger and Hattle, 2003). Most abortions occur either
sporadically on farms with annual abortion rates of less than 3% or as more frequent abortions on
farms with annual abortion rates of 5 to 10 per cent (Taylor, 2000). Occasionally, abortion
storms may occur, where rates may reach 60% of cows at risk and may be associated with
introduction of infection (horizontal transmission) or by recrudescence of infection in
endemically infected herds (Haddad et al., 2005). It is possible for cattle that have previously
aborted due to Neospora infection to have a repeat abortion with seropositive cows two to 24
times more likely to abort than seronegative cows (Weston et al., 2005). However, the
epidemiology is complex, as the relative risk of aborting may be age dependent and lower in
older animals (Haddad et al., 2005). Additionally, some seropositive cows do not abort (Innes et
al., 2001), with the factors that enhance the likelihood of a seropositive cow aborting remaining
largely unknown, although stress and concurrent disease have been suggested (Haddad et al.,
2005).
Infection is thought to reduce milk production in adult dairy cows through its effects on fertility
as cows which have aborted often produce a lower milk yield and are more likely to suffer
retained fetal membranes (Hobson et al., 2002). Seropositive cows that do not abort may not
have lower yields though. A high abortion incidence in the herd may lead to an increase in
involuntary culling. Neospora infections in young calves have been reported to cause
neuromuscular disease and may affect growth rate of finishing animals (Barling et al., 2001).
7
The overall economic effect of Neospora infection in a herd is not clear, although direct costs
are due to abortion, infertility, returns to service and loss of milk yield and indirect costs through
replacements.
2.9 Diagnosis
The diagnosis of neosporosis is based on the examination of maternal and fetal sera ideally
combined with the examination of fetal tissues.
Immunofluorescent antibody test (IFAT) and indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay (ELISA) are used for diagnosis. If positive, fixed foetal brain (or cardiac tissue if
brain is unavailable) is examined for lesions. The combination of foetal serology and
lesions is used to make a diagnosis.
Histopathology of fetus: In histopathological examination of brain characteristic
nonsuppurative encephalitis is suggestive of Neospora infection and also the lesions in
the heart are characteristic for diagnosis (Matthews, 2009)
Clinical diagnosis may involve consideration of the whole herd’s health status, with
confirmation of Neospora caninum as the cause of abortion only in the absence of other
agents
2.10 control and prevention of niosporiosis
At present, there is no effective treatment for neosporosis. Control of abortion in infected cattle
depends on saving food and water sources and the grazing environment from feces of any
animal. Aborted fetuses and placentas should be removed or incinerated. The feces of dogs
should be prevented from contaminating animal foodstuffs. Congenitally infected cows are at
high risk for abortion thus seropositive animals should be culling from a herd .
8
3. BESNOITIA
3.1 Etiology and life cycle
Besnoitia are protozoan parasite with classified 9 species, which only 2 of these species are
important in livestock animals. Parasites of the genus Besnoitia are classified in the subfamily
Toxoplasmatinae, family Sarcocystidae, phylum Apicomplexa and comprises nine species (B.
besnoiti, Besnoitia benetti, Besnoitia jellisoni, Besnoitia wallacei, Besnoitia tarandii, Besnoitia
darling, Besnoitia caprae, Besnoitia akadoni and Besnoitia oryctofelis). However, uncertainty
exists regarding the differentiation of some of these species because only the life cycles of B.
darlingi, B. wallacei and B. oryctofelis are known (Dubey et al., 2003). Besnoitiosis is a
emergent parasitic disease that caused by Besnoitia besnoiti in cattle, and Besnoitia caprae in
goats. These parasites are in the family Sarcocystidae (Radostits et al., 2008), and they are an
obligate intr acellular apicomplexan protozoan parasites (Majzoub et al., 2010).
table 1. The two common Besnoitia species of animal
Specie Affinity site Intermediate hosts
Definitive host
Besnoitia besnoiti Skin, conjunctiva Cattle Cat, wild cats (Lion, leopard) Besnoitia caprae Skin, conjunctiva Goats Cat, wild cats (Lion, leopard)
Phylogenetic analyses showed Besnoitia to be reproducibly the sister group to a clade containing
Hammondia, Neospora and Toxoplasma (Ellis et al., 2000). B. besnoiti host range includes all
breeds of cattle. Infection by Besnoitia besnoiti-like organisms has also been described in two
species of antelopes (blue wildebeest and impala), although their isolates seem to be
viscerotropic rather than dermatotropic, and are relatively non-pathogenic (Bilgake, 1968). The
relationship of the Besnoitia sp. found in goats and named B. caprae (Cheema and Toofanian,
1979) to B. besnoiti has not been determined, although Besnoitia of cattle, wildebeest and goats
had identical ITS1 rDNA sequences which questions the use of the taxon Besnoitia caprae to
describe the Besnoitia found in goats (Ellis et al., 2000). The relationship between Besnoitia
tarandii found in reindeer, caribou, mule deer and roe deer in North America and Finland
(Dubey et al, 2005) and B. besnoiti remains unexplored.
9
A variety of laboratory rodents such as rabbits, gerbils, hamster and mice and some domestic and
wild bovids (sheep, goats and black wildebeest) have been found to be susceptible to artificial
infection with bovine strains of B. besnoiti (Dubey, 1977). It is suspected that B. besnoiti has a
heteroxenous life cycle. The definitive host (DH) has not been identified, although for other
Besnoitia spp. a role for a carnivorous DH has been suggested (Rommel, 1978). Peteshev et al.
(1974) (cited by Bigalke, 1981) suggested that both, domestic cats and a wild cat (Felis lybica),
shed oocysts after ingestion of cystcontaining tissues. However, these observations have not been
reproducible by others (Diesing et al., 1998) and the DH remains unknown. Two asexual and
infective stages of this parasite develop in cattle, the fast-replicating merozoite-like endozoites
(tachyzoites) that multiply by endodyogeny in endothelial cells of blood vessels and the slow-
dividing cystozoites (bradyzoites), which gather into macroscopic cysts located inside cells of
the subcutaneous connective tissue. Cyst formation starts approximately 1 week after the initial
cycle of proliferation (Basson et al., 1970). The characteristic thick-walled cysts reach a size of
up to about 400 μm and contain approximately 200.000 cystozoites each.
3.2 Epidemiology
Disease occur as outbreaks in tropical and subtropical countries and sporadically in other
countries (Radostits et al., 2008). Bovine besnoitiosis is common in Africa, Asia and in the
South of Euroup ( Jacquiet et al., 2010), Caprine besnoitiosis in Keny a, Uganda, Iran, and
Kazakhastan. In livestock, cattle and goats are intermediate host, and cats are their definitive
hosts (Radostits et al., 2008). It is thought that agent is transmitted mainly by hematophagous
insects (Jacquiet et al., 2010). Many aspects of the epidemiology of bovine besnoitiosis remain
uncertain including prevalence and incidence of infection and disease in endemic areas, routes of
transmission and risk-factors associated to infection and disease.
3.3 Pathogenesis
Following infection in cattle or in goats, the tachyzoites proliferate in macrophages, fibroblasts,
and endothelial cells and causing vasculitis. Subsequently they develop to form bradyzoite cysts
in fibroblasts in the derm is, subcutaneous tissues, fascia, nasal and laryngeal mucosa (Taylor et
al., 2007; Radostits et al., 2008). After developing cysts in the skin, painful subcutaneous
10
swelling, thickening of the skin, alopecia, and necrosis can be occur (Taylor et al., 2007).
Sterility in males is caused by a necrotizing orchitis. Death may occur in both the anasarca and
scleroderma stages of the disease, regardless of the sex of the animal
3.4 Clinical findings
3.4.1 Bovine besnoitiosis
Clinical signs occur in two stages: acute and chronic. the acute anasarca stage, which is mainly
associated with proliferation of endozoites in blood vessels. In this clinical signs include fever,
increase in pulse and respiratory rates, painful swelling on the ventral aspects of the body,
edema of the skin, sometimes diarrhea, lacrimation and nasal discharge. the chronic scleroderma
stage, which is mainly associated with cyst formation In chronic stage, there is a severe
dermatitis over most of the body (Radostits et al., 2008). The severity of the disease may vary
between mild and severe and even death of seriously affected animals. Many infected animals
remain asymptomatic and the only sign of the disease is the presence of cysts in the sclera and
conjunctiva and/or the vulval area in cows (Fernandez- Garcia et al., 2009a).
3.4.2 Caprin besnoitiosis
Thickening of the skin over the lower limbs , around the eyes, nose, face and scrotum, alopecia
in all of these areas, and white granul ar cysts in the sclero-conjunctiva can be seen (Oryan and
Azizi, 2008).
3. 5 Transmission of besnoitiosis
Horizontal transmission is probably the main method of transmission of infection, given the
significant association between the disease prevalence and the animals' age (Fernandez-Garcia et
al., 2009a). It is likely that horizontal transmission occurs as a consequence of direct contact
among animals with wounds or lacerations, since subcutaneous tissue cysts can be located very
superficially. A role for transmission through infected bulls in natural mating herds has been
suggested (Castillo et al., 2009). The emergence of clinical signs coincides with summer, when
mixed herds share pastures. However, some authors have associated this phenomenon with the
11
period when blood-sucking arthropods, such as horseflies and deer flies, become active, and they
may play a role by transmitting B. besnoiti mechanically from chronic or asymptomatic infected
cattle. The role of a carnivorous definitive host in the epidemiology of bovine besnoitiosis
remains to be elucidated. Wild ruminants and probably rodents should not be disregarded as
reservoirs of the parasite (Melhorn et al., 2009).
3.6 Risk factors for besnoitiosis
3.6.1 Seasonality factors
In South Africa the majority of new cases occur during the warmer, moister months of the year
(Bigalke, 1981). Based on limited observations from two outbreaks in Europe, it was noted that
the emergence of clinical signs coincided with the summer period, when mixed herds shared
pastures (Alzieu, 2007) and blood-sucking arthropods, such as horseflies become active. Breed.
All breeds of cattle seem to be susceptible to besnoitiosis. In South Africa most cases occur in
the Africander, a Bos indicus breed, which is the most common in the endemic region (Bilgake,
1981). The infection has been described both in dairy and beef cattle and in a high variety of
breeds.
3.6.2 Age factors
Bigalke (1981) reported that there is a relationship between the age of the animal and the
epidemiology of the disease. In this report, a statistically significant increase in seroprevalence
and morbidity, evidenced by typical clinical signs, was associated with age. The highest
incidence of infection was detected in adult animals on a farm where the disease was present, but
was rarely encountered in calves under 6 months of age. A significant association has been found
between the prevalence of the disease and the age of the animal in a recent outbreak in central
Spain (Fernandez-Garcia et al., 2009a).
3.6.3 Sub-clinical carriers as factor
A higher seroprevalence has been observed in subclinical animals in some outbreaks in Spain
(Fernandez-Garcia et al., 2009a); this agrees with observations made by other authors in South
12
Africa (Bigalke, 1968). Vectors and reservoirs. The existence of blood-sucking flies could be a
risk factor for the rapid spread of the disease (Zacarias, 2009). Mechanical transmission by
Glossina, Stomoxys and tabanids has been demonstrated (Bigalke, 1968). The potential role of
wildlife reservoirs of disease, e.g. wild ruminants and rodents, has also been suggested (Bigalke,
1981; Castillo et al., 2009; Mehlhorn et al., 2009).
3.7 Economic and welfare impact of besniotiosis
The disease causes a serious illness both during the acute and chronic phases that could
compromis animal welfare. Bovine besnoitiosis leads to significant economic losses by a decline
in milk production, sterility, transient or permanent infertility of bulls, skin lesions and increase
of mortality in affected cattle population. It is a disease with a high prevalence in tropical and
subtropical regions and re-emerging in Europe.
3.8 Diagnosis of besnotiosis
Besnoitiosis can be diagnosed by demonstration of B. bradyzoites in skin biopsy smears or
scleral conjunctival scrapings (Radostits et al., 2008). A number of diagnostic tests such as
cytology (Sanussi, 1991), histopathology (Bigalke, 1968), serology (Alvarez- Garcia et al., 2009)
and PCR testing (Cortes et al., 2007) are available. During the first weeks following infection,
acutely infected animals may be difficult to be accurately clinically diagnosed due to non-
specific signs. The characteristic clinical signs appear with the development of tissue cysts
during the chronic stage; when the clinical inspection is very useful to detect affected animals.
Skin biopsies to confirm the existence of tissue cysts, examining the sample by trichinelloscopy
plates or even histopathology are good methods to confirm the disease. However they are not
suitable for the detection of chronic and subclinical infections, where the number of cysts in
cattle overall may still be relatively high, but too low to detect cysts on a histological skin slide.
Serological tests – ELISA and Western blot – could be useful tools to detect asymptomatic/sub-
clinical cattle for control purposes.
13
3.9 Treatment and Control of besniotiosis
Concerning control, there are not any effective drugs(no known treatment) for this disease
(Taylor et al., 2007) or vaccines available, although in South Africa and Israel a live-attenuated
vaccine has been used (Basson et al., 1970). In South Africa, in an extensive field trial on farms
where the disease was severe, Bigalke et al. (1974) found that 100% of the cattle were protected
from the clinical form of the disease over an observation period of 1 to 4 years when inoculated
with a blue wildebeest strain of B. besnoiti vaccine. only reliable diagnosis together with herd-
management measures are available to avoid that non-infected herds acquire the infection due to
trade with infected animals. Control is effected by the elimination of infected animals and
carriers, and early diagnosis ( Antonio Castillo et al., 2009 ).
4. REFERENCES
14
Agosti, M., Belloni, A., Morini, M., Vacirca, G., 1994. Segnalazione di un focolaio di
Besnoitiosi in bovine da carne importati. Praxis 15: 5-6.
Alvarez-García, G., Fernandez-García, A., Aguado-Martínez, A., Schares, G., Basso, W.,
Gollnick, N.S., Ortega-Mora, L.M., 2009. Serological diagnosis of bovine besnoitiosis:
development of an indirect ELISA and a comparative study with a commercial ELISA.
In: 22st International Conference WAAVP, Calgary (Canada), p.11.
Alzieu, J.P., 2007. Re-emerging cattle besnoitiosis (Besnoitia besnoiti) in France: update on
clinical and epidemiological aspects. In: 21st International Conference WAAVP, Gante
(Belgium), p.222.
Antonio Castillo, J., Miguel Ma rcen, J., Ortega Mora, L. M ., and Alvarez Garcia, G., 2009.
Bovine besnoitiosis, presented as an emer ging disease in Europe. Albeitar (127)
Zaragoza: ASIS Veterinaria, 24-25.
Asamare k.(2014) Seroprevalence of Neospora caninum and associated risk factors in intensive
or semi-intensively managed dairy and breeding cattle of Ethiopia
Barling, K. S. Lunt, D. K. Snowden, K. F. Thompson, J. A. (2001) Association of serologic
status for Neospora caninum and postweaning feed efficiency in beef steers. Journal of
the American Veterinary Medical Association. 219: 9, 1259-1262.
Basso, W. Venturini, L. Venturini, M. C. Moore, P. Rambeau, M. Unzaga, J. M. Campero, C.
Bacigalupe, D. Dubey, J. P. (2001) Prevalence of Neospora caninum infection in dogs
from beef-cattle farms, dairy farms, and from urban areas of Argentina. Journal of
Parasitology. 87: 4, 906-907.
Besnoit, C., and Robin. V. 1912. Sarcosporidioses cutanée chez une vache. Rec. Vet. 37 : 649.
Bigalke, R., Schoeman, J.H., McCully, R.M., 1974. Immunization against bovine besnoitiosis
with a live vaccine prepared from a blue wildebeest strain of Besnoitia besnoiti grown in
cell cultures. 1. Studies on rabbits. Onderstepoort J.Vet. Res. 41, 1-6.
Boger, L. A. Hattel, A. L. (2003) Additional evaluation of undiagnosed bovine abortion cases
may reveal fetal neosporosis. Veterinary Parasitology... 113: 1, 1-6. bovine abortion- a
review. Veterinary Practitioner. 3(2), 94-100.
15
Bwangamoi O., 1967. A preliminary report on the finding of Besnoita besnoiti in goat skins
affected with dimple in Kenya. Bull Epizoot Dis Afr 15: 263-271.
Castillo, J.A. 2005. Besnoitiosis bovina. X Congreso Internacional de Medicina Bovina. 13-14
Mayo, 2005.
Castillo, J.A., Marcén, J.M., Ortega-Mora, L.M., Alvarez-Garcia, G., 2009. La besnoitiosis
bovina, presentada como una enfermedad emergente europea. Albeitar 127, 24-25.
Cheema, A.H. and Toofanian. F., 1979. Besnoitiosis in wild and domestic goats in Iran. Cornell
Veterinarian, 69, 159-168.
Cortes, H.C, Leitao A., Vila-Vicosa, M.J., Ferreira, M.L., Caeiro, V., Hjerpe, C.A. 2005.
Besnoitiosis in bulls in Portugal. Veterinary Record, 157(9):262-4.
Cortes, H.C., Reis, Y., Waap, H., Vidal, R., Soares, H., Marques, I., Pereira da Fonseca, I.,
Ranzendeiro, I., Ferreira, M.L., Caeiro, V., Shkap, V., Hemphill, A., Leitao, A., 2006c.
Isolation of Besnoitia besnoiti from infected cattle in Portugal. Vet. Parasitol. 141 (3-4),
226-233.
Cortes, H.C., Vidal, R., Reis, Y., el al., 2004. Bovine besnoitiosis, one approach for a better
understanding of its importance in Portugal. Proceedings of 23rd World Buiatrics
Congress 2004:35-6.
Diesing, I., Heydorn, A.O., Matuschka, f.r., Bauer, C., Pipano, E., de Waal, D.T., Potgieter, F.T.,
1988. Besnoitia besnoiti: studies on the definitive host and experimental infections in
cattle. Parasitol. Res. 75 (2), 114-117.
Dubey, J. P. (2005) Neosporosis in cattle. Veterinary Clinics of North America-Food Animal
Practice 21 473-+
Dubey, J.P. Sreekumar, C., Donovan, T., Rozmanee, M., Rosenthal, B.M., Vianna, M.C.B.,
Davis, W.P., Belden, J.S., 2005. Redescription of Besnoitia bennetti (Protozoa:
Apizomplexa) from the donkey (Equus asinus). 35 (6), 659-72.
Dubey, J.P., 1977. Toxoplasma Hammondia, Besnoitia, Sarcocystis, and other tissue cyst-
formation coccidia of man and animals. In: Parasitic protozoa, vol 3, Kreier J.P. ed New
York, Academic Press.
Dubey, J.P., Buxton, D., and Wouda, W., 2006. Pathogenesis of bovine neosporosis. Journal of
Comparative Pathology. 134 (4), 267-289.
16
Dubey, J.P., Lindsay, D.S., 2003. Development and ultrastructure of Besnoitia oryctofelisis
tachyzoites, tissue cysts, bradyzoites, schizonts and merozoites. International Journal of
Parasitology 33, 807-819.
Ellis, J. T., Holmdahl, J.M., Ryce, C., Njenga, M.J., Harper, P.A.W., Morrison, D.A., 2000.
Molecular phylogeny of Besnoitia and the genetic relationships among Besnoitia of
cattle, wildebeest and goats. Protist, 151, 329-336..
Fernandez-García, A., Risco-Castillo, V., Pedraza-Diaz, S., Aguado-Martínez, A., Alvarez
García, G., Gomez-Bautista, M., Collantes-Fernandez, E., Ortega-Mora, L., 2009. First
isolation of Besnoitia besnoiti from a chronically infected cow in Spain. J. Parasitol., 95
(2) 474-476.
Ferre, I. Aduriz, G. Pozo, I. del Regidor-Cerrillo, J. Atxaerandio, R. Collantes-Fernandez, E.
Hurtado, A. Ugarte-Garagalza, C. Ortega-Mora, L. M. (2005) Detection of Neospora
caninum in the semen and blood of naturally infected bulls. Theriogenology. 63: 5, 1504-
1518.
Franco, E., and Borges, I., 1915. Nota sobre a sarcosporidiose bovina. Revista de Medicina
Veterinária, Ano XIV: 255-299.
Frank, M., Pipano, E., Rosenberg, A., 1977. Prevalence of antibodies against Besnoitia besnoiti
in beef and dairy cattle in Israel. Refuah Veterinarith 34, 83-86.
Goldman, M., Pipano, E., 1983. Serological studies on bovine besnoitiosis in Israel. Trop Anim
Health Pro 15, 32-38.
Gondim, L. F. P. McAllister, M. M. Mateus-Pinilla,Neospora E. Pitt, W. C. Mech, L. D. Nelson,
M. E. (2004) Transmission of Neospora caninum between wild and domestic animals.
Journal of Parasitology. 90: 6, 1361-1365.
Gottstein, B., Jaquiet, F., Schares, G., Cortes, H., Ortega-Mora, L.M., 2009. Symposium on
bovine besnoitiosis. In: 22nd International Conference WAAVP, Calgary (Canada). 38.
Gumber, S., Aradhana, Sharma, D.R., and Singh, J., 2002. Neosporosis- an emerging cause of
Haddad, J. P. A., Dohoo, I. R., and VanLeewen, J. A. (2005) A review of Neospora caninum in
dairy and beef cattle - a Canadian perspective. Canadian Veterinary Journal-Revue
Veterinaire Canadienne 46 230-243
17
Hobson, J. C., Duffield, T. F., Kelton, D., Lissemore, K., Hietala, S. K., Leslie, K. E., McEwen,
B., Cramer, G., and Peregrine, A. S. (2002) Neospora caninum serostatus and milk
production of Holstein cattle. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
221 1160-1164
Innes, E. A. Wright, S. E. Maley, S. Rae, A. Schock, A. Kirvar, E. Bartley, P. Hamilton, C.
Carey, I. M. Buxton, D. (2001) Protection against vertical transmission in bovine
neosporosis. International Journal for Parasitology 31: 13, 1523-1534
Jacquiet, P., Lienard, E., an d Franc, M., 2010. Bovine besnoitiosis: epidemiological and clinical
aspects. In: Franc, M., Kramer, L., and Jacobs, D. (Eds): Veterinary Parasitology. 174
(1/2) Oxford: Elsevier Ltd, 30-36.
Janitscheke K., De Vos A.J., Bigalke, R.D., 1984. Serodiagnosis of bovine besnoitiosis by
ELISA and immunofluorescence tests. Onderstepoort. J. Vet. Res. 51, 239-243.
Juste, R.A., Cuervo, L.A., Marco, J.C., Oregui, L.M., 1990. La besnoitiosis bovina: desconocida
in España? Med. Vet 7 (11), 613-618.
Kramer, L. Risio, L. de Tranquillo, V. M. Magnino, S. Genchi, C. (2004) Analysis of risk factors
associated with seropositivity to Neospora caninum in dogs. Veterinary Record. 154: 22,
692-693. 64 101-112
Kumi-Diaka, J., Wilson, S., Sanusi, A., Njoku, C.E., Osori, D.I., 1981. Bovine besnoitiosis and
its effect on the male reproductive system. Theriogenology 16 (5), 523-530.
Marotel, M., 1912. Discussion of paper by Besnoit e Robin. Bull. et Mem. de la Soc. des
Sciences Vet. de Lyon et de la Soc. de Med. Vet. de Lyon e du Sud-Est 15, 196–217.
Matthewa, J., 2009. Abortion. 3th Edn. In: Diseases of the goat.Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Pp:
23- 41.
Mehlhorn, H., Klimpel, S., Schein, E., Heydorn, A.O., Al-Quraishy, S., Selmair, J., 2009.
Another African disease in central Europe: Besnoitiosis of cattle. I. Light and electron
microscopical study. Parasitol Res.
Neuman, M., 1972. Serological survey of Besnoitia besnoiti (Marotel 1912) infection in Israel by
immunofluorescence. Zentralbl. Vetrinarmed. B. 19 (5), 391-396.
Peteshev, V.M., Galuzo, I.G., Polomoshnov, A.P., 1974. Cats- definitive hosts of Besnoita
(Besnoitia besnoiti) (In Russian). Azv Akad Nauk Kazakh SSR B 1: 33-38.
18
Pols, J., 1960. Studies on bovine besnoitiosis with special reference to the aetiology.
Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res. 28: 265-356.
Radostits, O.M., Gay, C.C., Blood, D.C., and Hinchcliff, K.W., 2000. Veterinary Medicine. A
Textbook of the Diseases of Cattl e, Sheep,Pigs, Goats and Horses, 9 th Ed. W.B.
Saunders, Philadelphia.
Radostits, O.M., Gay, C.C., Hinchcliff, K.W., and Constable, P.D., 2008. Diseases associated
with protozoa. 10th Edn. In: Veterinary Medi cine: A Textbook of Diseases of cattle,
horses, sheep, pigs, and goats. Saunders Elsevier; pp: 1483-1540
Rommel, M., 1978. Comparative review of the developmental biology of the genera Sarcocystis,
Frenkelia, Isospora, Cystoisospora, Hammondia, Toxoplasma and Besnoitia. Z.
Parasitenkd 27; 57 (3): 269-283.
Rostaher, A., Mueller, R.S., Majzoub, M., Schares, G., Gollnick, N.S., 2009. Bovine besnoitiosis
in Germany. Vet. Dermatol. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2009.00813.x
Schares, G., and Conraths, F.J., 2007. Neospora caninum as a cause of bovine abortion- news
regarding pathogenesis, epidemiology and diagnosis. Praktische Tierarzt. 88 (9)
Hannover: Schlütersche Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, 730-740.
Schares, G., Barwald, A., Staubach, C., Ziller, M., Kloss, D., Schroder, R., Wurm, R., Rauser,
M., Labohm, R., Drager, K., Fasen, W., Hess, G., and Conraths, F. J. (2004) Occurrence
of Neospora caninum infections in cattle of Rhineland-Palatinate (Germany).
Tierarztliche Praxis Ausgabe Grosstiere Nutztiere 32 325-327
Schares, G., Basso, W., Majzoub, M., Cortes, H.C., Rostaher. A., Semair,J., Hermanns, W.,
Conraths, F.J., Gollnick, N.S., 2009. First in vitro isolation of Besnoitia besnoiti from
chronically infected cattle in Germany. Vet. Parasitol. 163 (4), 31-322.
Smith, M.O., George, L.W., 2009. Diseases of the nervous system. In: Smith, B.P. (Eds): Large
Animal Internal Medicine. Mosby, Elsevier, St. Louis.
Taylor, M.A., Coop, R.L., and Wall, R.L., 2007. Veterinary Parasitology. Third Edn. Blackwell
Publishing.
Taylor, M.A., Coop, R.L., and Wall, R.L., 2007. Veterinary Parasitology. Third Edn. Blackwell
Publishing.
Wallace G.D., and Frenkel J.K., 1975. Besnoitia species (Protozoa, Sporozoa, Toxoplasmatidae):
recognition of cyclic transmission by cats. Science. 1975 Apr. 25; 369-71.
19
Weston, J. F. Williamson,Neospora B. Pomroy, W. E. (2005) Associations between pregnancy
outcome and serological response to Neospora caninum among a group of dairy heifers.
New Zealand Veterinary Journal. 53: 2, 142-148.
Wouda, W. Dijkstra, T. Kramer, A. M. H. Maanen, C. van. Brinkhof, J. M. (1999)
Seroepidemiological evidence for a relationship between Neospora caninum infections in
dogs and cattle. International Journal for Parasitology. 29: 10, 1677-1682.
Zacarias, J.A., 2009. Epidemiología (seroprevalencia y vectores) de la Besnoitiosis bovina de las
Sierras de Urbasa y Andía. Doctoral Thesis. University of Zaragoza.
20