Negative Views Of The Family
description
Transcript of Negative Views Of The Family
Negative Views Of The Family
In the 1960's Edmund Leach likened the family to an 'over loaded electrical circuit waiting to blow a fuse' his main argument was that we had become too privatised and isolated in our nuclear family settings and this was causing too much pressure on relationships. He advocates breaking out from these insular units and getting in touch with our fellow human beings.
Laing 1970 –
Parents and children are linked by a complex web of emotions and tensions.These can cause a ‘breakdown’ - a sort of identity crisis for certain individuals.As a result Laing advocated treating the ‘whole’ family.Hence family therapy sessions
Cooper 1972Working in the same field as Laing, Cooper attacks family life for curbing the freedom of children and suppressing their individuality. As a result subservience and obedience are promoted within society. Cooper is in tune with Marxists when he says that the family is 'an ideological conditioning device in an exploitive society'
Perspectives On The Family
Foucault 1975 – Critical theory Foucault maintained that agencies such as the law, social workers, welfare services, the tax system etc are controlling family life. The stereotypical nuclear family model of parents + kids is held up as the norm
Perspectives On The Family
Foucault 1975 - Themes of his work:- 1. Conventional motherhood is reinforcedMothers who want to work are restricted by difficulties arranging childcare.Working for women is portrayed as not ‘normal’Women experience guilt and stress as a result
2. Emphasis on discipline and conformity in modern societyConfession of inadequacies to ‘experts’eg doctors, counsellors, psychologists etc
Perspectives On The Family
Morgan 1980agrees with Foucault from a Marxist perspective in that the family is an institution under siege in the modern world. The supposedly private world of family life is kept in check via agencies of the state
Marriage & Marital breakdown
Fewer people are getting married than at any other time in the last 40 years.
However:1. People are delaying marriage
rather than rejecting it2. Most people still see marriage
as desirable
Marriage & Marital breakdown
Types Of Marital Breakdown Divorce – legal ending of a marriage
freeing partners to marry againSeparation – live apartDesertion – where one partner doesn’t
know where the other has goneEmpty –shell -where marriage exists in
name only – ‘staying together for sake of children etc
Marriage & Marital breakdown
Explanations for increasing divorce rate1. Divorce laws 1969 Divorce Reform Act (became law in 1971)
introduced ‘irretrievable breakdown’ as a no fault reason for divorce.
After 2 years separation if both agreed 5 years if only one agreedEssentially made divorce easier to obtain!
Marriage & Marital breakdown
Explanations for increasing divorce rate1. Divorce laws cont1984 Act – allowed couples to get divorced
after 1 yr of marriage.1996 Act aimed at trying to introduce ‘no fault’
divorce (still not been adopted as of writing)
Marriage & Marital breakdown
2. Less stigmaAs divorce became more common it
became more acceptable and part of every day life.
Marriage & Marital breakdown
3. Changing role of women About 75% of petitions for divorce are
made by women.Women now are :-• Educated to higher levels.• Work more and have independent
finance.• Less likely to stay in an ‘empty shell’
marriage.
Marriage & Marital breakdown
4. People Live Longer People spend more time together and
therefore have more chance of falling out
Plus people in unhappy relationships now feel there is time to leave and start again with someone else
Marriage & Marital breakdown
5. Secularisation The decline in the religious
significance of marriageLess church weddingsPromises made ‘before God’ not seen
as binding
Marriage & Marital breakdown
6. Privatisation Of Family Life Rather than a ‘haven in a heartless world’
some see the family as the source of discontents
Search for intimacy creates tensions within relationships
People expect too much from each other.Less pressures from wider kin to stay
together
Marriage & Marital breakdown
7. The value of marriage Functionalists like Fletcher & Parsons
argue that people place a higher value on marriage now than in the past
People expect more from a partner and will no longer put up with second-rate relationships
Gibson 1994 says that the modern emphasis on individual achievement and consumerism has extended to relationships
Factors likely to cause divorce
AgeLower the age at marriage = HCD
(higher chance divorce)Teens more likely to grow apartEconomic pressures etc
Factors likely to cause divorce
Class MC have lower rates than WCHighest rates among unemployed
Factors likely to cause divorce
Social & Status Differences
The greater the differences between partners - class, age, ethnicity,, religion
= HCD
Factors likely to cause divorce
Ethnicity Divorce rates low amongst Asian
groups
Factors likely to cause divorce
Family History If your parents divorced - you have
a higher chance of divorce
Less opposition from parents when seeking a divorce
Factors likely to cause divorce
Duration HCD in first 5 years of marriage
Older people now divorce more 30+ yrs marrieds are 2x more likely to
divorce now than 10 yrs ago
Consequences Of Divorce
Recent studies suggest that kids from divorced backgrounds are more likely to
Get divorced themselvesUnderachieve at schoolBe unemployedSuffer poor healthBecome criminals
Exeter Study 1994 - Cockett & Tripp children in ‘reordered families’ (step)
suffered problems of adjustment until later in life.
Children wanted to stay with both natural parents even with the tensions involved
Norwegian Study 1994 - Moxnes Sees positive side of divorce
Creation of a new ‘bi-nuclear’ family with good relations between old and new partners and children
Could be seen as an over optimistic view!
Define The Following Terms
MonogamySerial Monogamy
Polygamy
Polyandry
Polygyny
Cohabitation
Coleman & Salt 1992 Suggest that the popularity of marriage
has declined because traditional assumptions have changed.
New ideas, the changing role of women and more reliable methods of birth control are all contributory factors
Cohabitation
Reasons For The Increase In Cohabitation
• Marriage is less fashionable.• Marriage is expensive.• Decline in religious beliefs.• Economic and employment insecurity.• High divorce rates make people wary of
commitment
Civil Partnerships
What is a Civil Partnership?The Civil Partnership Bill was passed on the 17th November 2004, becoming the Civil Partnership Act 2004.
It is official acknowledgement that same-sex relationships, with the requirements of commitment and recognition, exist.
Registered couples will have new legal status as "registered Civil Partners" and will be protected by a package of rights similar to those of married couples.
The Act gives registered gay couples the right to apply for joint state pensions, shared parental responsibility and recognition under inheritance laws.
This brings the UK into line with other European countries that recognise same sex couples, including Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Norway, and Sweden.
Family Diversity
The image of the ‘cereal packet family’ (Leach) is promoted as the basic family model
i.e. married adults plus kids. However others argue that a
plurality of forms now exist
Family Diversity
Ron & Rhona Rapoport 1982 Give 5 types of diversity 1. Organisational DiversityVariations in family structuree.g. single parentsReconstituted families etc
Family Diversity
2. Cultural Diversity There are differences based
on ethnic origins and religious beliefs
Family Diversity
3. Class Diversity There are many differences
between MC and WC families.
Higher divorce rates among WC
Family Diversity
4. Life-cycle Diversity Newly marrieds without
children have a different life style to those with children
Family Diversity
5. Cohort Diversity This refers to the periods at
which groups of families have lived through specific things together
e.g. war
Family Diversity
Eversley & Bonnerjea 1982 – Regional Diversity They argue that different areas of Britain
have different patterns of family organisation.
In rural areas extended kinship is important, inner cities have higher percentages of single parents and the southern ‘sun belt’ has more 2 parent upwardly mobile families.
Family Diversity
Weekes, Donovan & Heaphey 1999 – Homosexual Families
Say that Gay and Lesbian households have
become more common since the 1980’s. They describe such units as ‘chosen’ families –
they choose whom to include as ‘family’ members.
Family Diversity
New Reproductive Technologies Surrogacy provides the potential for a whole
new way of forming families.
Family Diversity
Modhood et al 1997 - Ethnicity Whites and Caribbean’s have highest rates of
divorce in UK Asians and Africans have highest marriage rates
and highest rates of children living with both natural parents – 90% (75% for whites, 50% Caribbean’s)
Caribbean’s have highest single parent rate in UK
Family Diversity
Single Person Households 25% of households are occupied by one person
and this proportion is rising.A significant number are elderly women and
divorced and separated. However more people, particularly young professionals, are choosing to live alone.
Ducan And Phillips 2008Simon Duncan and Miranda Phillips found that
1 in 10 adults are LATs – i.e. they are in a ‘significant relationship’ but do not actually live together
LATs
Why People Live Apart Together
• Choice – Gives couples a feeling of space still
• Circumstance – Sometimes separated/divorced couples with their own children do not want to upset their lifestyles
• Houses – couples do not want to give up their own homes
LATs
Single Parents
25% of families in the UK are single parents90% are female headed60% are ex married (divorced, separated or
widowed)
Single Parents
Consequences Murray 1993A New Right thinkerClaims single parenting has helped to
create an anti-social underclass
Single Parents
McIntosh 1996 Disagrees and says that Lone mothers
have been used as scapegoats for problems such as youth crime and unemployment
Single Parents
McLanahan & Booth 1991 Say children from single parents are more
likely to suffer poverty, become delinquent and abuse drugs.
But more a result of low income than lack of 2 parents
Single Parents
Cashmore 1985 Best for children to live with one caring
adult than 2 fighting ones.Women become more independent in
single parent units
Reasons For Increase In Single Parents
1. Divorce Since 1971 Divorce has been easier to
obtain
Reasons For Increase In Single Parents
2 Social Acceptance Less stigma attached to being a single
parent todayLinks to secularisation – less religious
practice and thinkingMedia portrays single parents more
positively today
Reasons For Increase In Single Parents
3. Welfare State Some like the New Right feel that it is
too easy to rely on benefits etcFeminists and others point to the
fact that women are no longer tied to a man financially and therefore can leave unhappy relationships.v
Reasons For Increase In Single Parents
4. Increase In Never Marrieds 40% of single mums are in this categoryAverage age of a lone mum is 34
Why are 90% Of Single Parents Women?
When couples divorce women are more likely to be given custody of the children by the courts – much to the disappointment of many father support groups.
Men are more likely to have better paid jobs/careers and don’t want to interrupt these to take on childcare full time.
Some men feel that their masculinity is threatened if they become child carers.
It is more socially acceptable still for mothers to be single parents than men – despite many mothers and toddler groups becoming ‘parents and toddlers’ there are not many men joining in up and down the country.
Effects• Children often find themselves pulled in
2 directions• feelings of disloyalty to one parent• Sometimes tensions with step parent• Complications arise when the new
couple have their own children
Reconstituted Families
Family Diversity?
The above evidence is taken by many to suggest that there is a plurality of family forms in the UK today. Post Modernists say that there is diversification, variation and instability.
Others argue that the diversity angle is
exaggerated, most children live with their natural parents, most people do get married and while 4 in 10 marriages end in divorce 6 in 10 do not.
Family Diversity? Chester 1985 – The Neo- Conventional Nuclear Family
Says that changes in family life have been minor
• If one looks at the % of people rather than households1/2 the population of UK live in nuclear families
• Many who aren’t will form nuclear families in the future
• The only big change is that many more women now work
• Most people do get married• Most divorcees remarry
Family Diversity?
However since Chester’s writing there has been a slow but steady drift away from nuclear families in the UK.
Nuclear families are still very common but other family types (particularly single parents and reconstituted families) are becoming more common.
Choice And Equality – Giddens 1992
Anthony Giddens has argued that family and marriage have been transformed since the war by choice and equality:
Contraception has allowed sex and intimacy to become more important than reproduction in a relationship
Women have gained greater equality and independence in the last 50 years
Giddens talks about ‘pure relationships’ being created couples get together for’love’ rather than a sense of duty
Giddens concedes that this means a less stable relationship is formed.
Beck 1992 - Risk Society and Negotiated Families
Ulrich Beck has made much of the concept of a ‘risk society’ He argues that in earlier times roles were more fixed and we had few choices – e.g. where we lived, worked, played and married.
Today such ‘fixed things’ are rare and we are faced with more choices – and consequently more risks!
We now have ‘negotiated families’ i.e. where members decide for themselves what they want. Such families may have broken away from the inequality and patriarchy of the past but are now more unstable
Beck 1992 - Risk Society and Negotiated Families
Ulrich Beck has made much of the concept of a ‘risk society’ He argues that in earlier times roles were more fixed and we had few choices – e.g. where we lived, worked, played and married.
Today such ‘fixed things’ are rare and we are faced with more choices – and consequently more risks!
We now have ‘negotiated families’ i.e. where members decide for themselves what they want. Such families may have broken away from the inequality and patriarchy of the past but are now more unstable
Postmodernism
Beck (as a postmodernist himself) illustrates the effect of 2 key postmodernist concepts
1 Diversity/Fragmentaion – A pick’n’mix of family types2 Rapid Social Change – new technology, new inventions, new
work patterns have all added to the feeling of uncertainty for people.
Postmodernism
Beck (as a postmodernist himself) illustrates the effect of 2 key postmodernist concepts
1 Diversity/Fragmentaion – A pick’n’mix of family types2 Rapid Social Change – new technology, new inventions, new
work patterns have all added to the feeling of uncertainty for people.
Judith Stacey in research in California has found that the increase in divorce has led to an increase in ‘divorced extended families’
Stacey used life history interviewsMany women had divorced and remarried
but stayed in touch with the children’s grandparents and made relationships with new step grandparents.
Help was often given financially and domestically
Divorced Extended Family – Stacey 1998Divorced Extended Family – Stacey 1998
For Diversity Against Diversity
Postmodernists, and FeministsDiversity = choiceNo one family form should be held up as a superior modelVariety = liberty
For Diversity Against Diversity
Postmodernists, and FeministsDiversity = choiceNo one family form should be held up as a superior modelVariety = liberty
Functionalists and The New RightNuclear Family is the best unitIt best meets the need of societyA key socialising unit for the youngOther family forms are seen as dysfunctional