Neel Camel Rating
-
Upload
aksrinivas -
Category
Documents
-
view
237 -
download
0
Transcript of Neel Camel Rating
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 1/48
CAMEL RATING
BY: NILAM PATEL
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 2/48
RATING SYSTEM
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 3/48
C AMEL Background
The CAMEL methodology was originallyadopted by North American bank regulators
to evaluate the financial and managerialsoundness of U.S. commercial lendinginstitutions and also by National Credit UnionAdministration (NCUA) in October 1987
Credit Unions , datedDecember 1994
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 4/48
C AMEL RATING
An international bank-rating system with which
bank supervisory authorities rate institutionsaccording to certain factors. The areas examinedare represented by the "CAMEL."
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 5/48
THERE ARE SIX ELEMENTS
C AMEL :
C APITAL ADEQUA C YASSET QUALITYMANAGEMENTEARNINGSLIQUIDITY
?
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 6/48
Purpose of C AMEL ratings
F inancial
Operational
Managerial
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 7/48
Revision of C AMEL Rating System
Sensitivity to Market Risk
J anuary 1, 1997.
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 8/48
RATINGP ROVISIONS
´ Rating 1 indicates strong performance: BEST rating.´ Rating 2 reflects satisfactory performance.´Rating 3 represents performance that is flawed to somedegree.
´ Rating 4 refers to marginal performance and issignificantly below average and´ Rating 5 is considered unsatisfactory: W ORST rating.
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 9/48
C apital Adequacy
- C apital Adequacy- Debt-Equity Ratio- Advances to Assets- G-Secs to Total Investments
Rating factorsC apital is rated based on the followingconsiderations:
Asset and capital growthEarnings performance and distribution of dividendsAccess to capital markets
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 10/48
C apital rating 1
Rating ´1µ is characterized by:
Capital levels and ratios exceed all regulatory requirements
Strong earnings performanceWell managed and controlled growthReasonable dividends
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 11/48
C apital rating 2
Rating ´2µ is characterized by similar criteria as´1µ, but experiences weaknesses is one or moreof the factors.
Capital and solvency ratios exceed regulatoryrequirements, but :Problem assets relatively high.
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 12/48
C apital rating 3
Ratingµ3µindicates that the bank complies with capitaladequacy and solvency regulatory requirements, but hasmajor weaknesses in in one or more factors:
Problem assets in excess of 25% of total capitalBank fails to comply with regulatory regulationsPoor earningsInability to raise new capital
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 13/48
C apital rating 4
Rating ´4µ means that the bank is experiencingsevere problems resulting in inadequate capital tosupport risks associated with the business andoperations:
Problem loans in excess of 50% of total capital.
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 14/48
C apital rating 5
Ratingµ5µ indicates that the bank is insolvent.
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 15/48
Asset Quality
Asset represents all the assets of the bank, current andfixed, loan portfolio, investments and real estate
- Net NPAs to Net Advances- Total Investments to Total Assets- Percentage change in Net NPAs- Net NPAs to Total Assets
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 16/48
Rating factors
Asset quality is based on the followingconsiderations:
Volume of problem assetsVolume of overdue loansAbility of management to administer all the assets of
the bank and to collect problem loansLoan portfolioM I S
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 17/48
Asset quality rating 1
Asset quality rating ´1µ is characterized by:Ratio of troubled assets to capital is less than 2% or3%
Efficient loan portfolio managementAdequate Loan Loss Reserves in accordance with CBI·sregulations
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 18/48
Asset quality rating 2
Asset quality rating ´2µ is assigned to banks that areexperiencing non significant weaknesses, and themanagement is able to address these issues withoutclose regulatory oversight.
Problem assets do not exceed 10 % of total capital, but:The bank isexperiencing negative trends in the level of overdue and prolongedcredits.
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 19/48
Asset quality rating 3
Regulatory oversight is required to ensure thatmanagement is able to address the problems. Othercharacteristics are:
Poor underwriting standardsPolicies and procedures are not properly implemented
Bank is experiencing high level of past due and rescheduledcredits
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 20/48
Asset quality rating 4
Asset quality rating ´4µ indicates a bank with severeproblems resulting in inadequate capital to support risksassociated with the bank business and operations.
High volume of loss m aking lo an s .Level of pr oblem cr ed it s continues to increase and could result ininsolvency.
Lack of proper policies and procedures.
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 21/48
Asset quality rating 5
Problem assets to capital ratio above 50%.
Law a u tho r ize CBI t o se nd an c us t od ian fo r a ssessme nt an d r e comme nd ati o ns.
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 22/48
Management
Rating factorsQuality of the monitoring and support.Development and implementation of written policies,procedures, MIS, risk monitoring system, reporting,safeguarding of documents, contingency plan and compliancewith laws and regulationsAudit
Profit per BranchBusiness per EmployeeProfit per Employee
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 23/48
Management rating 1
Management rating ´1µ indicates a strong andcommitted management.
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 24/48
Management rating 2
Management rating ´2µ has the general characteristics of´1µ but possesses some deficiencies in rating factors,that can be easily corrected without regulatory
supervision.
Careful consideration should be given to the financialcondition of the bank.
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 25/48
Management rating 3
Among the problems are:
Disregard for regulatory requirementsPoor assessment of risks and planningInappropriate reactions to economic adversitiesLack of proper written policies and procedures
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 26/48
Management rating 4
Management rating ´4µ indicates major weaknessesin several areas.
Strong regulatory action is needed.
Board of Directors should consider replacing or
strengthen management .
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 27/48
Management rating 5
Management rating ´5µ requires immediate andstrong supervisory actions:
Bank displays strong weaknesses in all areasPoor financial performanceInsolvency very likely
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 28/48
- Percentage Growth in Net Profits- Spread- Net Profit to Average Assets- Interest Income to Total Income- Non-Interest Income to Total Income
It refers to the net profit that is made by the bank. Higher earningimplies bank is doing well but one should look whether this earning is onaccount of core banking that is interest income or from other incomes.
Earnings
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 29/48
Rating factors
Earnings are rated according to the following factors:
Sufficient earnings to cover potential losses, provideadequate capital and pay reasonable dividends
Earnings exposure to market risks, such as interest ratevariations, foreign exchange fluctuations and price risk
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 30/48
Earnings rating 1
Rating ´1µ indicates:
Sufficient income to meet reserve requirements,provide capital growth and pay reasonabledividends to shareholders
Strong budgeting, planning and control of incomeand expenses
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 31/48
Earnings rating 2
Rating ´2µ indicates that the bank generates sufficientincome to meet reserve requirements, provide capitalgrowth and pay dividends. Nevertheless there may besome negative trends such as:
Need to improve budget, planning and controlprocess
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 32/48
Earnings rating 3
Earnings rating ´3µ shows that the bank has majorweaknesses in several of the rating factors.
Regulatory supervision is needed to ensure management takesappropriate measures to improve earnings performance
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 33/48
Earning rating 4
Earning rating ´4µ indicates bank is experiencingsevere earnings problems.
Net profit may be positive, but insufficient to maintainadequate reserves and capital growth.
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 34/48
Earning rating 5
Earning rating ´5µ shows bank is experiencing majorlosses that may lead into insolvency.
Immediate action is needed and strong regulatory supervisionis required from CBI
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 35/48
- Liquid Assets to Total Assets
- Liquid Assets to Total Deposits
The ability to generate cash or turn quickly shortterm assets into cash
Liquidity
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 36/48
Liquidity rating 1
Sufficient liquid assets to meet loan demand andunexpected deposit reduction
Little reliance on inter-bank market
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 37/48
Liquidity rating 2
Bank meets its liquidity requirements, but managementlacks proper expertise for planning, control and
monitoring
Management is unaware of negative trends
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 38/48
Liquidity rating 3
Liquidity ratingµ3µ indicates a bank has majorweaknesses in several factors.
Poor liquidity management
Regulatory supervision is usually required to assure
management is taking care of the problems
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 39/48
Liquidity rating 4
Severe liquidity problems.
Management must engage in extensive planning to deal with thesituation.
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 40/48
Liquidity rating 5
Liquidity ratingµ5µ shows a bank requiresoutside financial assistance to meet current liquidityrequirements to prevent failure of the bank due to theinability to meet creditors and depositors needs.
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 41/48
Sensitivity to market risk
BetaMarket risk is based primarily on the following evaluation factors:
Sensitivity to adverse changes in interest rates, foreignexchange ratesTrends in the foreign currencies exposure
Changes in the value of the fixed assets of the bank
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 42/48
C omposite rating
The composite rating assigned is not an arithmeticaverage of the component ratings, but is based on aqualitative analysis of the factors comprising each
component, the interrelationship between components,and the overall level of supervisory concern about thebank.
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 43/48
C omposite rating 1
Banks with a composite rating of ´1µ are:
sound in all aspects,
generally have components rated 1 or 2
compliance with laws and regulations.
Any weaknesses can be handled routinely by theboard of directors and management.
stable
well managed
capable of withstanding all but the most severe
economic downturns.
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 44/48
C omposite rating 2
Banks with a composite rating of 2 are:
fundamentally sound;
generally no component is rated higher than ´3µ,
moderate weaknesses are present
well within the capabilities of the board of directors·and management·s capability and willingness to correct .
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 45/48
C omposite rating 3
Banks rated ´3µ generally have:
weaknesses in one or more component areas that if not
corrected within a reasonable time frame could result insignificant solvency or liquidity concerns.
CBI should consider the need for administrative actions
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 46/48
C omposite rating 4
Banks rated ´4µ indicate:
serious unsafe and unsound practices
serious financial or managerial deficiencies
Incapable board of directors and management.
significant violations with laws and regulations.
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 47/48
C omposite rating 5
Banks rated ´5µ exhibit :
extremely unsafe and unsound practices or conditions,
The volume and severity of problems are beyondmanagement·s ability or willingness to control orcorrect.
Failure is highly probable
8/6/2019 Neel Camel Rating
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/neel-camel-rating 48/48
THANK YOU«
QUERY???