NBFCs.pdf

download NBFCs.pdf

of 22

Transcript of NBFCs.pdf

  • 8/13/2019 NBFCs.pdf

    1/22

    Non-Bank ing Fin an cial In st i tu t ions

    Chapt er VI

    1. In troduct ion

    6.1 Non-bank ing financial institutions (N BFI s)

    are an important part of the Indian financial

    system. T he NB FI s at pr esent consi st of aheterogeneous group of institutions that cater to

    a wide range of financial requirem ents. T he major

    interm ediaries include financial institutions (F Is),

    non-bank ing financial companies (N B FC s) and

    pri m ary dealers (P D s).

    6.2 T hi s chapter provides an analysis of the

    financial performance and soundness indicators

    related to each segm ent of N BFI s duri ng 2011-12.

    T he chapter i s organised i nto five sections. Section

    2 analyses the financial perform ance of FI s, whi le

    Section 3 discusses the financial perform ance of

    NB FC s-D and NB FC s-ND -SI , including R NB C s.

    Section 4 provides an analysis of the perform ance

    of PD s in the pri m ary and secondary m ark ets,

    followed by the overall assessm ent i n S ection 5.

    2. Financia l Ins t i tu t ions

    6.3 A s at end-M arch 2012, there were fi ve

    financial institutions (FIs) under the full-fledged

    regulati on and supervision of the R eserve Bank ,

    v i z. , E xport Import Bank of India (E X IM Bank ) ,

    N a t io na l B ank f or A gr i cu l ture and Rur a l

    D evelopment (N AB AR D ), N ational H ousing B ank

    (N H B ), Sm all Industri es D evelopm ent Bank of

    I ndia (SI D B I ) and Industrial I nvestment Bank of

    India ( I IBI) (Table VI.1). However, I IBI is in the

    process of voluntary winding-up.

    The non-banking financial sector is witnessing a consolidation process, with smaller NBFCs (deposit-

    taking) opting for either merger or closure and some larger ones getting converted into non-deposit-

    taking NBFCs. NBFCs are comfortably placed with higher capital. The financial performance of

    deposit-taking Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs-D) showed an improvement as reflected

    in the increase in their operating profits mainly emanating from growth in fund-based income.

    Systemically Important-Non-deposit taking NBFCs (NBFCs-ND-SI) segment continued to rely on

    bank finances for their resource requirement. There is sign of deterioration in the quality of assets in

    respect of NBFCs-ND-SI. The set of regulations prescribed for NBFCs sector is expected to make the

    NBFCs more resilient in the medium term. The combined balance sheets of financial institutions(FIs) expanded and operating profit as well as net profit have increased significantly. The impaired

    assets of the FIs showed increase and are a matter of concern. The increase in expenses of PDs more

    than compensated for the increase in income which led to reduced profit. PDs are comfortably placed

    with higher CRAR.

    Table VI.1: Owner sh ip Patt ern of

    Financia l Ins t i tu t ions

    (A s on M arch 31, 2012)

    I nsti tution O wnership Per cent

    1 2 3

    E X I M B ank G overnm ent of I ndia 100

    NAB AR D G overnm ent of I ndia

    R eserve Bank of India

    99.3

    0.7

    NH B R eserve B ank of I ndia 100

    SI D B I * Public Sector B ank s

    Insurance Compani es

    Financial Institutions

    O thers

    62.5

    21.9

    5.3

    10.3

    *ID BI Bank Ltd. ( 19.2 per cent), S tate Bank of India (15.5 per cent) andL ife Insurance Corporation of I ndia ( 14.4 per cent) are the three maj or

    shareholders in SI D BI .

  • 8/13/2019 NBFCs.pdf

    2/22

    121

    Non-Banking Financial Ins t i tut ion s

    Operations of Finan cia l Inst i tut ions

    Combin ed ba la nce sheets of f inanc ia l

    inst i t u t i ons (FIs) expan ded

    6.4 T he financial assistance sanctioned and

    di sbursed by FI s increased dur ing 2011-12 due

    to increase in sanctions and di sbursem ents made

    by i nvestment i nstitutions (L I C and G I C ) and

    specifi ed financial i nstitutions (I V C F and T FC I ).

    H owever, sanctions and di sbursements m ade by

    I FC I have declined i n 2011-12 (T able V I .2 and

    Appendix T able VI .1).

    Asset s an d Liabilities of FIs

    6.5 T he com bi ned balance sheets of FI s

    expanded dur ing 2011-12. O n the liabi li ties side,

    deposits and bonds and debentures remain the

    m ajor sources of borr owings dur ing 2011-12. O n

    the assets side, loans and advances conti nued to

    be the si ngle largest component, contr i buti ng

    m ore than four-fi fth of the total assets of the FI s

    (T able VI .3).

    Table VI.2: Financial Assis tance Sanctioned and

    Disbursed by Financia l Ins t i tu t ions(Am ount in `billion)

    C ategory A mount Percentage

    Variation

    2010-11 2011-12 2011-12

    S D S D S D

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7

    (i) All-India

    Term-lendi ng

    Instituti ons *

    545 472 478 478 -12.2 1.2

    (ii) Specialised

    Financial

    Instituti ons #

    9 5 11 8 21.3 66.8

    (iii) Investment

    Instituti ons @

    450 401 544 520 20.8 29.5

    Total Assistance by

    FIs (i+ ii+ ii i)

    1 ,0 0 4 8 7 8 1 ,0 3 3 1 ,0 0 6 2 .9 1 4 .5

    S: Sanctions. D : D isbursements.

    * : R elating to IFC I, SID BI and II BI.

    # : R elating to IV CF, IC IC I Venture and T FC I.

    @ : R elating to LI C and GI C & erstwhile subsidiaries (NIA , U IIC and

    O I C ) .

    Notes: 1. Com ponents m ay not add up to the whole due to round in goff.

    2. D ata pertain in g to 2011-12 are provi sional.

    Source: R especti ve Fi nancial Institu ti ons.

    Table VI.3: Liabilities and Assets of

    Financia l Ins t i tu t ions

    ( As at end-M arch)(Am ount in `m ill ion)

    I tem 2011 2012 P Percentage

    Variation

    Liabilities

    1. C api tal 49,000

    (1.7)

    62,000

    (1.8)

    26.5

    2. R eserves 4,26,071

    (14.7)

    4,65,001

    (13.8)

    9.1

    3. Bonds & D ebentures 9,00,968

    (31.0)

    10,72,973

    (31.9)

    19.1

    4. D eposi ts 9,27,817

    (31.9)

    10,90,780

    (32.4)

    17.6

    5. Borrowings 4,26,807

    (14.7)

    4,95,207

    (14.7)

    16.0

    6. O ther L i abi li ties 1,75,493

    (6.0)

    1,77,294

    (5.3)

    1.0

    Tota l Liab ilit ies /Assets 2 9 ,0 6 ,1 5 6 3 3 ,6 3 ,2 5 5 1 5 .7

    Assets

    1. C ash & B ank Balances 65,219

    (2.2)

    67,398

    (1.9)

    3.3

    2. Investm ents 1,18,023

    (4.1)

    1,25,559

    (3.7)

    6.4

    3. L oans & A dvances 25,61,759

    (88.2)

    29,82,001

    (88.7)

    16.4

    4. Bi lls D iscounted/

    R ediscounted

    35,422

    (1.2)

    29,636

    (0.9)

    -16.3

    5. Fixed Assets 5,374

    (0.2)

    5,364

    (0.2)

    -0.2

    6. O ther Assets 1,86,822

    (6.4)

    1,53,297

    (4.6)

    -17.9

    P: Provisional.

    Notes: 1. Data pertain to 4 F Is, vi z. , EX I M B ank , NA B A R D , NHB &S I D B I .

    2. Fi gures in parentheses are percentages to total L i abil iti es/

    Assets.

    Source: Audited OSM O S Returns of EX IM Bank, NAB ARD and SIDBIended M arch 31, and for N H B J une 30.

    Resou rces Mobilised by FIs

    Comm ercia l Paper (CP) is the m ajor source of

    funds

    6.6 T he resources m obi li sed by FI s dur ing

    2011-12 were considerably higher than in the

    previous year. T he NH B has m obi li sed the largest

    amount of resources, followed by NABAR D , SI D B I

    and EX IM Bank (T able VI .4) .

    6.7 D ur ing 2011-12, there was a signi ficant

    increase in the resources raised by FI s thr ough

    comm ercial paper (C P) , which accounted for m ore

    than 70 per cent of the total resources m obi li sed

    from the m oney m ark et (T able V I .5).

  • 8/13/2019 NBFCs.pdf

    3/22

    122

    Repor t on Trend and P rogres s of Banking in India 20 11-12

    Sources an d Uses of Fund s

    6.8 T he m ajori ty of the funds raised were used

    for fr esh deploym ents, fol lowed by repaym ent of

    past borr owings (T able V I .6) .

    Matur i ty and Cost of Borrowings an d Len ding

    6.9 T he wei ghted average cost of R up ee

    resources raised went up across the board. Whi le

    the weighted average m atur i ty of R upee resources

    raised by SI D B I and NA BAR D has gone up, i n the

    case of E X I M B ank and NH B they came down

    duri ng 2011-12 (T able VI .7). While both E X I M

    B ank and SID B I r aised their pri m e lending rate

    dur i ng the year, the NH B k ept i t unchanged

    (T able VI .8).

    Table VI.4: Resources Mobilised by Finan cial Insti tu tions(Am ount in `billion)

    I nsti tutions Total R esources R aised Total O utstanding(A s at end-M arch)

    L ong T erm Short T erm Forei gn C urrency Total

    2010-11 2011-12 2010-11 2011-12 2010-11 2011-12 2010-11 2011-12 2011 2012

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

    EX I M B an k 111 88 15 55 111 84 237 227 472 547

    NA BA R D 97 179 185 90 - - 283 269 339 423

    NH B 75 555 295 827 - - 370 1,382 109 607

    SI D B I 100 139 23 80 12 20 135 239 341 440

    Total 3 8 4 9 6 1 5 1 8 1 ,0 5 2 1 2 3 1 0 4 1 ,0 2 5 2 ,1 1 7 1 ,2 6 1 2 ,0 1 6

    - : Nil/Negligible.

    Note:L ong-term R upee resources com pri se borr owings by way of bonds/debentures; short-term resources compr ise CP, term deposits, I C D s, C D s and

    borr owing from th e term m oney m ark et. Foreign currency resources largely com pri se bonds and borrowi ngs in th e internati onal m ark et.

    Source :R espective F I s.

    Table VI.5: Resourc es Raised b y Fina ncialIns t i tu t ions from Money Market

    ( As at end-M arch 2012)(Am ount in `mi ll ion)

    Instrument E X I M NA BA R D NH B SID B I Total

    1 2 3 4 5 6

    A. Total 4 9 ,3 5 5 9 0 ,3 4 7 2 8 ,9 5 3 5 0 ,9 1 5 2 ,1 9 ,5 7 0

    i ) Term D eposi ts 8,193 70 2,184 8,419 18,866

    i i ) Term M oney - 4,381 - - 4,381

    i i i ) Inter-

    corporate

    D eposi ts - - - - -

    iv) Certi ficate of

    D eposi ts 536 12,810 - - 13,346

    v) Comm ercial

    Paper 40,626 73,086 4,889 42,496 1,61,097

    vi) Short-term

    loans from

    bank s - - 21,880 - 21,880

    Memo:

    B. Umbrella Limit 7 5,4 58 2 ,0 7,9 41 4 1,5 50 8 9,6 73 4 ,1 4,6 22

    C. Utilisation of

    Umbrella l imit

    ( A as percentage

    of B)

    65.4 43.5 69.7 56.8 53.0

    - : Nil/Negligible.

    Source :Fortni ghtly return of resources m obili sed by financial i nstituti ons,

    Table VI.6: Pa t te r n of Sources and Deploymen t

    of Fun ds of Financia l Ins t i tu t ions

    (Am ount in `billion)

    I tem As at

    end-

    M arch

    2011

    As at

    end-

    M arch

    2012

    Percentage

    Variation

    1 2 3 4

    A. Sources of Fund s (i+ ii+ii i) 2,978(100.0)

    4,252

    (100.0)

    42.8

    i . I nternal 1,632

    (54.8)

    2,623

    (61.7)

    60.7

    i i . E xternal 1,191

    (40.0)

    1,495

    (35.2)

    25.6

    i i i . O thers@ 155

    (5.2)

    134

    (3.2)

    -13.7

    B. De plo ym e n t of Fu n d s (i + ii+ i ii) 2 ,9 7 8(100.0)

    4 , 2 5 2(100.0)

    4 2 . 8

    i . Fresh D eploym ent 1,747

    (58.7)

    2,739

    (64.4)

    56.8

    i i . R ep aym en t of p ast bor r owi ngs 840

    (28.2)

    1,290

    (30.4)

    53.7

    i i i . O ther D eploym ent 391

    (13.1)

    222

    (5.2)

    -43.2

    of which: I nterest Paym ents 142

    (4.8)

    145

    (3.4)

    1.9

    @ I ncludes cash and balances with b ank s, balances with the R eserve

    Bank and other bank s.

    Notes: 1. EX IM Bank , NABAR D , NHB and S IDB I .

    2. Figures in parentheses are percentages to totals.

    Source :R espective F I s.

  • 8/13/2019 NBFCs.pdf

    4/22

    123

    Non-Banking Financial Ins t i tut ion s

    Table VI.7: Weighted Average Cost and

    Maturity of Rupee Resources Raised by

    Selec t Financia l Ins t i tu t ions

    Institutions Weighted Average Cost

    (Per cent)

    Weighted Average M aturi ty

    (years)

    2010-11 2011-12 P 2010-11 2011-12 P

    1 2 3 4 5

    E X IM B ank 8.4 9.0 2.9 2.8

    SI D B I 7.0 7.2 2.5 3.7

    NA BA R D 7.1 9.5 1.1 1.9

    NH B 7.2 8.8 2.5 0.9

    P: provisional.

    Source :R espective F I s.

    Table VI.8: Long-term PLR Stru ctu re of Select

    Financia l Ins t i tu t ions(Per cent)

    E ffective E X IM B ank SID B I NH B

    1 2 3 4

    M arch 2011 14.0 11.0 10.5

    M arch 2012 15.0 12.75 10.5

    Source: R especti ve FI s.

    Table VI.9: Finan cial Perform an ce of Select

    All-India Financial Insti tutions

    (Am ount in `m ill ion)

    2010-11 2011-12 Var iation

    Amount Percentage

    A) In com e (a+ b ) 1 ,8 5 ,0 1 8 2 ,2 6 ,6 4 7 4 1 ,6 2 9 2 2 .5

    a) I nter est I n com e 1, 80, 167

    (97.4)

    2,16,887

    (95.7)

    36,720 20.4

    b) Non-I nterest

    Income

    4,851

    (2.6)

    9,760

    (4.3)

    4,909 101.2

    B) Exp en d itu re (a+ b) 1 ,3 7 ,4 2 2 1 ,6 2 ,9 0 8 2 5 ,4 8 6 1 8 .5

    a) I nterest

    Expenditure

    1,22,589

    (89.2)

    1,48,852

    (91.4)

    26,263 21.4

    b) O perating

    E xpenses

    14,833

    (10.8)

    14,057

    (8.6)

    -776 -5.2

    of which

    Wage B i ll 10,981 10,175 -806 -7.3

    C) Provisions for

    Taxation

    1 2 ,8 1 9 1 6 ,4 5 1 3 ,6 3 2 2 8 .3

    D) Profit

    O perating Profi t (PB T ) 39,374 48,849 9,475 24.1

    Net Profi t (PAT ) 26,556 32,399 5,843 22.0

    E) Financial Ratios @

    O perating Profi t 1.46 2.81

    Net Profi t 0.98 1.03

    Incom e 6.85 7.23

    Interest I ncome 6.67 6.92

    O ther I ncom e 0.18 0.31

    E xpendi ture 5.09 5.20

    Interest E xpendi ture 4.54 4.75

    O ther O perating

    E xpenses

    0.55 0.45

    Wage B i ll 0.41 0.32

    Provisions 0.47 0.52

    Spread

    (Net Interest Income)

    2.13 2.17

    @ : as percentage of T otal A verage Assets.

    Notes: 1. Fi gures in par entheses are percentages to total I ncome/

    Expenditure.

    2. Percentage var iati on could be slightly di fferent because

    absolute numbers have been r ounded off to `mi ll ion.

    Source :Audited OSM O S Returns of EX IM Bank, N ABAR D and SIDB I

    ended M arch 31, and for NH B J une 30.

    Financial Performance of FIs

    The pro f i tab i l i t y o f FIs substan t ia l ly increased

    w i th reduct ion in w age b i ll

    6.10 Both the operating profit and net profit of

    FI s increased signi ficantly dur ing 2011-12 ( T able

    V I .9) . T he return on assets (R oA) i s highest for

    SI D BI fol lowed by the NH B, E X IM Bank and

    NAB AR D (Table V I .10) .

    Table VI.10: Select Financial Parameters of Financial Insti tutions(A s at end-M arch)

    (Per cent)

    I nsti tution I nterest I ncom e/

    Average Work in g Funds

    Non-I nterest I ncome/

    Average Work in g Funds

    O perating Pr ofit/

    Average Work in g Funds

    R eturn on A verage Assets

    (Per cent)

    Net Profi t per Em ployee

    (`mi ll ion)

    2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

    E X I M B ank 6.5 7.1 0.5 0.6 2.2 2.5 1.2 1.1 24 27

    NAB A R D 6.2 6.5 0.1 0.2 1.3 1.4 0.9 0.9 3 4

    NH B * 7.7 8.6 0.04 0.05 1.7 2.1 1.1 1.3 32 38

    SI D B I 8.0 8.5 0.3 0.2 2.9 3.4 1.8 2.0 5 5

    *: Position as at the end of June.

    Source :Statements furni shed by the FI s.

  • 8/13/2019 NBFCs.pdf

    5/22

    124

    Repor t on Trend and P rogres s of Banking in India 20 11-12

    Soun dn ess Indicators: Asset Quali ty

    NPAs of FIs ha ve gone up substan t ia l ly d ur ing

    the year

    6.11 A t the aggregate level, the net NPA s of FI s

    have increased substantially. T he increase in net

    NPAs, however, was attributable m ainly to SID B I

    and EX IM Bank . While NA BA R D has maintained

    the same level, the NH B has reported no NPAs

    duri ng 2011-12 (T able V I .11).

    6.12 T here was a substantial increase in the

    sub-standard and doubtful assets of EX I M B ank

    (T able V I .12). T he higher N PAs in respect of E X I M

    B ank m ay be a reflecti on of the conti nued

    unfavourable external envir onm ent, especially in

    the context of Indias increased integration with

    the world econom y.

    Capita l Adequ acy

    FIs are comfor tab ly p laced wi th cap i ta l

    6.13 D ur ing the year 2011-12, all four FI s have

    m aintained a higher C R A R than the m ini m um

    stipulated norm of 9 per cent (T able V I .13) .

    3. Non-Banking Finan cia l Comp anies

    Th r ee new ca tego r i e s o f NBFCs have been

    created Infr astr uctu re Debt Fun ds (NBFC-IDF ),

    Micro Finan ce Inst i tu t ion (NBFC-MFI) and NBFC-

    Factors

    6.14 NB FC s are classi fied into two categori es,

    based on the liability structure, v iz . , C ategory A

    compani es (N BFC s accepting publi c deposi ts or

    N B FC s-D ), and Category B com panies (N B FC s

    not ra is ing publ ic deposi ts or N B FC s-N D ) .

    N B FC s-D are subj ect to requi rem ents of capi tal

    adequacy, li qui d assets m aintenance, exposure

    norms (including restrictions on exposure to

    investments in land, building and unquoted

    sh a r e s) , A L M d i sci p l i n e a n d r ep o r t i n g

    requir em ents; in contrast, until 2006 NB FC s-ND

    were subject to mi nim al regulation. S ince Apri l 1,

    2007, non-deposi t tak ing N BFC s wi th assets of `1

    bi l l ion and above are being classi f ied as

    System i cally I m portant N on-D eposi t tak i ng

    NBFC s (N BFC s-ND -SI ), and prudential regulations,

    such as capi tal adequacy r equi r ements and

    exposure norms along with reporting requirements,

    have been m ade applicable to them . T he asset

    l i ab i l i ty m anagem ent (A L M ) r eport ing and

    di sclosure norm s have also been made appl icable

    to them at di fferent points of tim e.

    Table VI.11: Net Non-Performing Assets

    ( As at end-M arch)

    (Am ount in `m ill ion)

    I nsti tuti ons Net NPAs Net NPAs/Net L oans (Per cent)

    2011 2012 2011 2012

    1 2 3 4 5

    E X I M B ank 930 1,558 0.2 0.3

    NAB AR D 298 371 0.02 0.02

    NH B .. . . . . . .

    S I D B I 1,321 1,847 0.3 0.4

    All FI s 2,549 3,776 0.1 0.13

    .. : Not Available.

    Source: Audited OSM O S Returns of EX IM Bank, NABA RD and SIDBI

    ended M arch 31, and for NH B J une 30.

    Table VI.12 : Asset Classification of Fina ncial In sti tu tions

    (A s at end-M arch)

    (Am ount in `mi ll ion)

    I nsti tution Standard Sub-Standard D oubtful L oss

    2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012 2011 2012

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

    E X IM B ank 4,55,628 5,37,340 1,966 4,044 2,456 3,871 358 44

    NA BA R D 13,94,594 16,49,324 - 221 681 681 10 10

    NH B * 2,25,814 2,85,185 .. . . . . . . . . . .

    S I D B I 4,59,215 5,36,034 1,427 2,123 1,364 385 - 1,227

    A ll FIs 25,35,251 30,07,883 3,393 6,388 4,501 4,937 368 1,281

    - : N il/Negligible. .. : Not A vailable. * : Position as at the end of June 2011 as per O SM O S r eturns.

    Source :Audited OS M O S R eturns of EX IM Bank, N ABA RD and SID BI ended M arch 31, and for NH B June 30.

  • 8/13/2019 NBFCs.pdf

    6/22

    125

    Non-Banking Financial Ins t i tut ion s

    6.15 N B FC s are also classi fied i n term s of

    activities into Asset Finance Companies (AFC),

    Investment Companies ( IC) , Loan Companies

    (LC), Infrastructure Finance Companies (IFC),

    C ore Investment C ompanies (C IC ), I nfrastructure

    D ebt Fund - N on-B ank ing Financial C ompanies

    (I D F-N B FC ), N on-B ank ing Fi nancial Com pany

    M icro F inance I nst i tut ions (N B FC -M FI ) and

    N B FC -Factors . D ur i ng 2011-12, two new

    categori es of N B FC s, v iz . , I nfrastructure D ebt

    Funds NB FC (N BF C -ID F) and M icro Finance

    I nst i tut ion ( N B FC -M FI ) were created andbrought under separate regulatory fram ework . I n

    addi ti on, a new category of NB FC -Factors was

    introduced in September 2012. Earlier in April

    2010, a r egulatory fram ework for S ystem ically

    I m portant C ore I nvestment Companies (C I C N D -

    SI ) was created for compani es with an asset size

    of `1 bill ion and above, whose business is

    investment for the sole purpose of holdi ng stak es

    in group concerns, are not trading in these

    securities and are accepting public funds.Prudential requirements in the form of Adjusted

    N et Worth and leverage were also pr escr ibed for

    C I C -N D -SI s as they were gi ven exem ption from

    N O F, capi tal adequacy and exposure norm s.

    6.16 An NB FC -M FI is defined as a non-deposi t-

    tak i ng N B FC ( other than a com pany li censed

    under Section 25 of the Indian Companies Act,

    1956) that fulfils the following conditions: (i)

    M ini m um N et O wned Funds of `5 crore (`2 crore

    for the N orth-eastern R egion), ( i i ) N ot less than

    85 per cent of its net assets are in the nature of

    quali fying assets, ( i i i ) the income i t derives from

    the rem aini ng 15 per cent assets in accordance

    with the regulations specified in that behalf. An

    N B FC which does not qualify as an NB FC -M FI

    shall not extend loans to the m icro finance sector,

    i n excess of 10 per cent of i ts total assets. G i ven

    the functional har dship faced by the M FI sector

    followi ng the A ndhr a Pr adesh M i cro Fi nance

    I nsti tutions (R egulations of M oney L endi ng)

    O r di nance, 2010 and to give repr i eve to the

    sector, the R eserve B ank m odi fied the regulatory

    f ram ework for M F I s to al low for t i m e for

    com pli ance to regulati ons and al low them to

    regi ster wi th the B ank as N B FC -M FI early.

    C onsidering the im portance of this sector for the

    developm ent and regulati on of m i cro-finance

    institutions to promote financial inclusion, the

    M i cro-Fi nance I nstituti ons (D evelopm ent and

    R egulation) B i ll, 2012 was introduced in the L ok

    Sabha on M ay 22, 2012 (B ox V I .1).

    6.17 T he ownership pattern of NBFC s-ND -SI as

    well as deposi t-tak ing NB FC s as at end-M arch

    2012, suggested that governm ent owned compani es

    have a share of below 3 per cent ( T able VI .14) .

    Pro file of NBFCs (in clud in g RNBCs)

    Non-Ban k in g f inan c ia l com pan ies segment is

    w i tnessing consol ida t ion

    6.18 T he total num ber of NBFC s registered with

    the Reserve Bank declined m arginally to 12,385

    as at end-June 2012 (C hart VI .1). A sim ilar trend

    was observed in the case of deposit-tak ing NB FC s

    ( N B FC s-D ) duri ng 2011-12, m ainly due to the

    cancellation of Certi ficates of Registration (C O R )

    and their exi t from deposi t-tak ing activi ties.

    6.19 D espi te the decli ne i n the num ber of

    N B FC s, thei r total assets as well as net owned

    funds registered an increase during 2011-12,

    whi le publi c deposi ts recorded a decli ne. T he

    share of R esi duary Non-B ank i ng Com panies

    (R N B C s) in the total assets of NB FC s showed a

    decli ne. T he net owned funds of R N B C s have

    Table VI.13 Capital to Risk (Weighted) Assets

    Ratio of Select Financial Insti tutions

    (A s at end-M arch)

    (Per cent)

    I nsti tution 2011 2012 P

    1 2 3

    E X IM B ank 17.0 16.4

    NA BA R D 21.8 20.6

    NH B * 20.7 19.7

    SI D B I 31.6 29.2

    *: Positi on as at the end of June 2012 as per O SM O S r eturns.

    P: Provisional.

    Source :Audited OSM OS Returns of EX IM Bank, N ABAR D and SID BIended M arch 31, and for NH B J une 30.

  • 8/13/2019 NBFCs.pdf

    7/22

    126

    Repor t on Trend and P rogres s of Banking in India 20 11-12

    T he M icro Fi nance Institutions (D evelopment andR egulation) B ill, 2012 aim s at providi ng a framework for the

    development and regulation of micro-finance institutions.

    T he Bill defines a mi cro-finance institution ( M FI ) as an

    organisation, other than a bank , pr ovidi ng m icro-finance

    servi ces as m icro credit faci li ti es not exceeding `5 lak h in

    aggregate, or wi th the R eserve B ank s speci fication of `10

    lak h per i ndi vidual. Subsid iar y servi ces li k e collection of

    thr i ft, pension or i nsurance servi ces and remi ttance of

    funds to individuals within India also come under these

    servi ces. T he Bi ll allows the Central G overnm ent to create

    a M icro-Finance D evelopment C ouncil ( M FD C ) that will

    advi se on poli cies and m easures for the developm ent of

    M FI s. B esides, the Bi ll allows the C entral G overnm ent toform S tate M icro-Fi nance Councils (SM FC ), which will

    be responsible for co-ord inati ng the activi ti es of D istrict

    M icro-Fi nance C ommi ttees in the respecti ve states.

    D istrict M icro-Fi nance C omm ittees (D M FC ) can be

    appointed by the R eserve Bank . T he B ill requir es all M FI s

    to obtain a certi ficate of registration from the R eserve

    B ank . T he applicant needs to have a net owned fund (the

    aggregate of pai d-up equi ty capi tal and fr ee reserves on the

    balance sheet) of at least `5 lak h. T he Reserve Bank should

    also be satisfied wi th the general character or management

    of the instituti on.

    E very M FI wi ll have to create a reserve fund and theR eserve Bank may speci fy a percentage of net profi t to be

    added annually to this fund. T here can be no appropr iati on

    from thi s fund unless specified by the Reserve B ank . A t the

    end of every financial year, M FI s are requi red to pr ovide

    an annual balance sheet and profit and loss account for

    audi t to the Reserve B ank . T hey will also have to provide

    a return, detailing their activities within 90 days of the

    B i ll being passed. Any change in the corporate structure

    of a M FI , such as shut-down, am algamati on, tak eover or

    restructuri ng can only tak e place with appr oval from the

    R eserve B ank .

    T he Bi ll has entrusted the R eserve Bank with the power to

    issue di rections to all M FI s. T his could include dir ections

    on the extent of assets deployed in pr ovid ing mi cro-finance

    servi ces, ceil ings on loans or r aising capital. T he R B I

    has the authori ty to set the ceili ng on the rate of i nterestcharged and the margin by M FI s. M argin i s defined as the

    di fference between the lendi ng rate and the cost of funds ( in

    percentage per annum ) .

    T he Reserve B ank shall create the M icro-Finance

    D evelopment Fund ( M FD F) . T he sums are raised from

    donors, institutions and the public along with the

    outstanding balance from the existing M icro-Fi nance

    D evelopm ent and E qui ty Fund. T he central governm ent,

    after due appropriation from Parliament, may grant money

    to this fund. T he fund can provide loans, grants and other

    m icro-credit faci li ties to any M FI s.

    T he Reserve Bank is responsible for redr essal of gri evancesfor beneficiar ies of micro-finance servi ces. T he Reserve

    B ank is empowered to i m pose a monetary penalty of up

    to `5 lak h for any contravention of the B i lls provisions.

    No civil court will have jur isdiction against any M FI over

    any penalty imposed by the Reserve Bank . T he B i ll gives

    the C entral G overnment the author i ty to delegate certain

    powers to the National B ank for Agri culture and Rur al

    D evelopment (N AB AR D ) or any other C entral G overnm ent

    agency. H owever, the Central G overnm ent has the power to

    exempt certai n M FI s from the provi sions of the B i ll.

    The Bi l l and i ts l ikely Im pact on the Microf inan ce Sector

    T he Bi ll envisages that the Reserve Bank would be the

    overal l r egulator of the M FI sector, regard less of legal

    structure. T he Reserve Bank has provided the views on the

    B ill to the G overnm ent of Indi a. T he aim s of the B ill ar e to

    regulate the sector in the custom ers in terest and to avoid

    a m ultitude of mi crofinance legislation in di fferent states.

    T he proper balancing of the resources at the Reserve B ank

    to supervise these addi tional sets of instituti ons besides the

    existing regulated insti tuti ons could be an im portant issue.

    R equir ing all M FI s to register i s a cri ti cal and necessary step

    towards effective regulation. T he proposal for appointm ent

    of an O mbudsman wil l boost the bank ing industrys own

    efforts to handle gri evances better. C ompulsory registration

    of the M FI s would br ing the erstwhi le money-lenders into

    the fold of organised financial services in the hinterland

    who had been acting as M FI s hi ther to.

    Box VI.1: Micro Finan ce Inst i tu t ions (Developmen t an d Regulat ion) Bil l, 20 12 and

    its Impact on th e Microfinan ce Sector

    however rem ained at m ore or less sam e level

    duri ng 2011-12 (T able V I .15).

    6.20 T he ratio of public deposi ts of NB FC s to

    aggregate deposits of S cheduled C om m erci al

    B ank s (SC B s) i n 2011-12 indi cates a decline. T he

    ratio of deposits of NBFCs to the broad liquidity

    aggregate of L 31 also declined during the year

    (C hart VI .2) .

    1 Includes NM 3 + Postal D eposits + Term M oney + C erti ficates of D eposit + T erm D eposit + public deposits with NB FC s.

  • 8/13/2019 NBFCs.pdf

    8/22

    127

    Non-Banking Financial Ins t i tut ion s

    Operations of NBFCs-D (excluding RNBCs)

    Fina nc ia l per fo rm ance of depos i t -tak ing Non-

    Ban k Fin anc ia l Com pani es (NBFCs-D) show ed

    improvemen t

    6.21 T he balan ce sheet size of N B F C s-D

    expanded at the rate of 10.8 per cent in 2011-12

    (T able V I .16) . T he borrowings constituted around

    two-thi rd of the total li abili ties of NB FC s-D . T he

    publi c deposi ts of NB FC s-D , whi ch are subj ect to

    credit ratings, continued to show an increasing

    trend dur ing 2011-12. O n the assets side, loans

    and advances r em ai ned the m ost i m por tant

    category for NB FC s-D , consti tuting about three-

    four th of thei r total assets. T he investm ent

    constituted the second m ost im por tant category,

    which witnessed subdued growth dur ing 2011-12

    m ainly due to a decli ne in non-SL R investm ents.

    6.22 Asset Fi nance C ompani es (A FC s) held the

    lar gest share in the total assets of NBFC s-D at

    end-M arch 2012 (T able V I .17).

    Table VI.14 : Ownersh ip Pa tter n of NBFCs

    (A s on M arch 31, 2012)

    (Number of Companies)

    O wnership NB FC s-ND -SI D eposi t-tak ingNB FC s

    1 2 3

    A . G overnm ent C om pani es 9

    (2.4)

    7

    (2.6)

    B . Non-G overnm ent C om panies 366

    (97.6)

    266

    (97.4)

    1. Public L td C om panies 198

    (52.8)

    263

    (96.3)

    2. Pr ivate L td C om panies 168

    (44.8)

    3

    (1.1)

    T otal No. of C om panies (A )+ (B ) 375

    (100.0)

    273

    (100.0)

    Note: Fi gures in parentheses are percentages to total num ber of N B FC s.

    Table VI.1 5: Pro file o f NBFCs(Am ount in ` billion)

    I tem As at end-M arch

    2011 2012P

    NB FC s of which:

    RNBCs

    NB FC s of which:

    RNBCs

    1 2 3 4 5

    T otal A ssets 1,169 115 1,244 76

    (9.8) (6.1)

    Publi c D eposi ts 120 79 101 43

    (66.0) (42.2)

    Net O wned Funds 180 30 225 31

    (16.6) (13.7)

    P: Provisional

    Note : 1. N BFC s comprise NB FC s-D and RN BC s.

    2. Fi gures in par entheses are percentage shares in respecti ve

    total.

    3. O f the 273 deposit-tak ing NB FC s, 196 NB FC s filed Annual

    R eturns for the year ended M arch 2012 by the cut-off date,

    September 8, 2012.

    Source : A nnual/Q uarterly R eturns.

  • 8/13/2019 NBFCs.pdf

    9/22

    128

    Repor t on Trend and P rogres s of Banking in India 20 11-12

    Table VI.16 .Consolida ted Balance Sh eet of NBFCs-D

    (A mount in `billion)

    I tem As at end-M arch Variati on

    2010-11 2011-12 P

    2011 2012P Absolute Per C ent Absolute Per C ent

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7

    Paid-U p C api tal 36

    (3.5)

    32

    (2.8)

    -3 -6.4 -4 -11.5

    R eserves Surplus 135

    (12.8)

    162

    (13.9)

    13 10.9 27 20.2

    Publi c D eposi ts 41

    (3.9)

    58

    (5.0)

    12 43.5 18 43.8

    B orrowings 698

    (66.2)

    809

    (69.2)

    57 9.0 111 15.9

    O ther L iabi li ties 144

    (13.7)

    107

    (9.1)

    32 28.3 -37 -25.9

    Total Liab ilit ies/ Assets 1 ,0 5 4

    (100.0)

    1 , 1 6 9

    (100.0)

    1 1 2 1 1 .9 1 1 4 1 0 .8

    I nvestments 211 159 26 14.1 -52 -24.8

    ( i ) SL R Investm ents@ 135

    (12.8)

    134

    (11.5)

    39 40.0 -1.0 -0.7

    ( i i ) Non-SL R I nvestm ents 76

    (7.2)

    25

    (2.1)

    -12 -14.1 -51 -67.6

    L oans and A dvances 780

    (74.0)

    874

    (74.8)

    68 9.6 94 12.1

    O ther Assets 63

    (6.0)

    103

    (8.8)

    18 39.3 40 62.3

    P: Provisional

    @ SL R investments compr ise 'approved S ecuri ties' and 'unencumbered term deposits' in Scheduled Com mercial B ank s; L oans & advances include Hi re

    Pur chase and L ease Assets.

    Notes : 1. Figures in parentheses are percentages to respective total.

    Source : A nnual/Q uarterly R eturns.

    Table VI.17: Major Components of Liabilities of NBFCs-D by Classification of NBFCs(A s at end-M arch)

    (Am ount in ` billion)

    C lassi fi cation of NB FC s No. of C om pani es D eposi ts Borrowings L iabi li ties

    2011 2012P 2011 2012P 2011 2012P 2011 2012P

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

    A sset Fi nance C ompanies 174 160 36

    (89.4)

    45

    (76.9)

    490

    (70.2)

    581

    (71.8)

    740

    (70.2)

    856

    (73.2)

    L oan C ompanies 43 36 4

    (10.6)

    13

    (23.1)

    208

    (29.8)

    228

    (28.2)

    314

    (29.8)

    313

    (26.8)

    Total 2 1 7 1 9 6 4 0 5 8 6 9 8 8 0 9 1 ,0 5 4 1 ,1 6 9

    P: Provisional.

    Note: Figures in parentheses are percentage share to total.

    Size -wise Classification of Depos its of NBFCs-D

    Lar ger NBFCs are m ore success fu l in ra is ing

    pub l ic deposi ts

    6.23 A sharp increase was di scerni ble in the

    share of NB FC s-D with a deposi t si ze of ` 500

    m i lli on and above, accounting for about 93.2 per

    cent of total deposi ts at end-M ar ch 2012.

    H owever, onl y 7 N B FC s-D belonged to thi s

    category, constituting about 3.6 per cent of the

    total num ber of NB FC s-D . I t i ndi cates that only

    relatively lar ger N B FC s-D were able to rai se

    resources thr ough deposi ts ( T able V I .18 and

    Chart VI .3) .

  • 8/13/2019 NBFCs.pdf

    10/22

    129

    Non-Banking Financial Ins t i tut ion s

    Region-wise Composition of Deposits held by

    NBFCs

    6.24 A m ong m etropoli tan ci ti es, N ew D elhi

    accounted for the largest num ber of N B FC s-D ,

    whi le Chennai held the largest share of 69.7 percent i n total public deposi ts of NB FC s-D ( T able

    VI .19 and Chart VI.4).

    Table VI.18 : Pu blic Deposits he ld b y NBFCs-D

    by Deposit Range

    (Am ount in `mill ion)

    D eposi t R ange A s at end-M arch

    No. of

    NB FC s

    Am ount of

    deposit

    2011 2012 P 2011 2012 P

    1 2 3 4 5

    1. L ess than `5 mi llion 134 117 194 138

    2. M ore than `5 million and up

    to `20 million

    38 34 442 377

    3. M ore than `20 mi llion and up

    to ` 100 million

    28 27 1,287 1,131

    4. M ore than ` 100 million and

    up to ` 200 million

    7 7 1,084 1,092

    5. M ore than ` 200 million and

    up to ` 500 million

    2 4 807 1,201

    6. ` 500 m i llion and above 8 7 36,809 54,467

    Total 2 1 7 1 9 6 4 0 ,6 2 3 5 8 ,4 0 6

    P: Provisional

    Source: Annual/Q uarterly Returns.

    Table VI.19: Pu blic Deposits h eld by

    NBFCs-D - Region -wise(Am ount in `m ill ion)

    R egion As at end-M arch

    2011 2012 P

    Number of

    NBFCs-D

    Public

    D eposits

    Number of

    NBFCs-D

    Public

    D eposits

    1 2 3 4 5

    North 144 1,882 125 3,285

    E ast 8 39 5 39

    West 20 9,286 17 14,880

    South 45 29,416 49 40,206

    Tota l 2 1 7 4 0 ,6 2 3 1 9 6 5 8 ,4 1 0

    Met r opo l i t an c i t i e s :

    K olk ata 5 39 3 39

    C hennai 26 28,638 30 39,338

    M um bai 6 9,074 5 14,682

    New D elhi 50 976 43 2,390

    Tota l 8 7 3 8 ,7 2 8 8 1 5 6 ,4 5 0

    P: Provisional

    Source :Annual R eturns.

    Interest Rate on Pub lic Deposits with NBFCs

    NBFCs-ND-SI segm ent cont i nu es to rely heavi ly

    on bank f inan ce

    6.25 T here was an increase i n the shar e of

    publ ic deposi ts in the interest rate range of 10 percent to 12 per cent dur ing 2011-12 (T able V I .20

    and Chart VI.5).

  • 8/13/2019 NBFCs.pdf

    11/22

    130

    Repor t on Trend and P rogres s of Banking in India 20 11-12

    Matu rity Profile of Pu blic Deposit s

    6.26 T he largest proporti on of publi c deposi ts

    rai sed by NB FC s-D belonged to the shor t to

    medium end of the maturity spectrum. In 2011-

    12, there was an increase in the shares of deposits

    for m ore than 2 years (T able V I .21 and Chart V I .6) .

    6.27 B ank s and financial i nstituti ons were the

    major providers of funds for NBFC s-D , constitutingabout 50 per cent dur ing 2011-12. T his share has

    come down mar ginally. O thers (which include,

    in ter al ia, m oney borrowed from other compani es,

    comm ercial paper, bor rowings from m utual funds

    and any other types of funds that were not treated

    as public deposits) also registered a declining

    trend (T able VI .22).

    Assets of NBFCs

    Expa nsion in assets of AFCs w as not iceable

    6.28 T he total assets of N B FC s-D sector

    registered a m oderate growth dur i ng 2011-12

    m ainly due to an i ncrease in the assets of asset

    Table VI.20: Pu blic Dep osits h eld b y NBFCs-D

    Interest Rate Range-wise(Am ount in `mi ll ion)

    I nterest R ate R ange As at end-M arch

    2011 2012 P

    1 2 3

    U p to 10 per cent 29,963

    (73.8)

    32,460

    (55.6)

    M or e than 10 per cent an d u p to 12 per cen t 9 ,454

    (23.3)

    24,870

    (42.6)

    12 per cent and above 1,206

    (3.0)

    1,080

    (1.8)

    Total 4 0 ,6 2 3

    (100.0)

    5 8 , 4 1 0

    (100.0)

    P: Provisional

    Note: 1. T he rate of interest on publi c deposits cannot exceed 12.5

    per cent.

    2. Fi gures in par entheses are percentages to total.Source : Annual R eturns.

    Table VI.21 : Matu rity Patter n of Pub lic

    Deposits held by NBFCs-D(Am ount in `m ill ion)

    M aturi ty Period As at end-M arch

    2011 2012P

    1 2 3

    1. L ess than 1 year 9,816 11,720

    (24.2) (20.1)

    2. M ore than 1 and up to 2 years 7,942 15,530

    (19.6) (26.6)

    3. M ore than 2 and up to 3 years 19,877 24,980

    (48.9) (42.8)

    4. M ore than 3 and up to 5 years 2,221 6,170

    (5.5) (10.6)

    5. 5 years and above@ 769 10

    (1.9) (0.0)

    Tota l 4 0 ,6 2 4 5 8 ,4 1 0(100.0) (100.0)

    P: Provisional

    @ includes unclaim ed publi c deposits.

    Note: Fi gures in par entheses are percentages to respective total .

    Source: Annual R eturns.

  • 8/13/2019 NBFCs.pdf

    12/22

    131

    Non-Banking Financial Ins t i tut ion s

    finance compani es (T able V I .23) . A s at end-M arch2012, more than two-third of the total assets of

    the NB FC s-D sector was held by asset finance

    com pani es. C om ponent-wise, advances accounted

    for the predominant share of total assets, followed

    by investm ent.

    Distribution of NBFCs-D According to Asset

    Size

    6.29 A t end-M arch 2012, only 6 per cent of

    NB FC s-D had an asset size of mor e than ` 5,000

    million, which had a share of 97 per cent in the

    total assets of all NB FC s-D (T able V I .24) .

    Dist r ibut ion of Asse ts of NBFCs Type of

    Activity

    6.30 D ur ing 2011-12, assets held in the form

    of loans and advances of NB FC s-D witnessed

    signi ficant growth, whereas investm ent decli ned.T hese two categories of acti vi ti es constituted over

    90 per cent share in total assets of the NB FC s-D

    sector (T able V I .25) .

    Finan cial Performa nc e of NBFCs-D

    Fund -based in com e of the NBFCs-D segment

    has in creased

    6.31 T he financial perform ance of N B FC s-D

    witn essed i m pr ovem ent as reflected in the

    Table VI.22 : Sou rce s of Borrowin gs by NBFCs-D by Classification of NBFCs(Am ount in `billion)

    C lassi fication As at end-M arch

    G overnm ent B ank s and Fi nanci alInstitutions

    D ebentures O thers T otal B orrowings

    2011 2012P 2011 2012P 2011 2012P 2011 2012P 2011 2012P

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

    A sset Finance 0.0 0.0 283 300 123 198 84 83 490 581

    (0.0) (0.0) (80.2) (74.9) (85.7) (83.3) (59.0) (71.2) (70.2) (71.8)

    L oan C om panies 59 54 70 101 20 40 59 33 208 228

    (100.0) (100.0) (19.8) (25.1) (14.3) (16.7) (41.0) (28.8) (29.8) (28.2)

    Total 5 9 5 4 3 5 3 .2 4 0 1 1 4 3 2 3 8 1 4 3 1 1 6 6 9 8 8 0 9

    P: Provisional

    Note: Fi gures in parentheses are percentage to respective total.

    Source: Annual R eturns.

    Table VI.23 : Major Comp onen ts of Assets of

    NBFCs-D by Classification of NBFCs

    (Am ount in `billion)

    C lassi fication As at end-M arch

    A ssets Advances I nvestm ents

    2011 2012P 2011 2012P 2011 2012P

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7

    Asset Finance

    Companies

    740 856 557 656 126 180

    ( 70.2) ( 73.2) ( 71.5) ( 75.0) (59.9) (94.1)

    L oan C om panies 314 313 222 218 85 11

    (29.8) (26.8) (28.5) (25.0) (40.1) (5.9)

    Total 1,054 1,169 779 874 211 191

    P: Provisional

    Note: Fi gures in parentheses are percentage to r especti ve total.

    Source: Annual R eturns.

    Table VI.24 : Assets of NBFCs-D byAsset-Size Ran ges

    ( As at end-M arch)

    (Am ount in `m ill ion)

    Asset R ange No. of

    Companies

    A ssets

    2011 2012P 2011 2012P

    1 2 3 4 5

    1. L ess than `2.5 mi llion 2 0 2 0.0

    2. M ore than `2.5 million

    and up to`5.0 m i llion 9 11 35 45

    3. M ore than `5.0 million

    and up to `20 m i llion 70 55 804 691

    4. M ore than `20 million

    and up to `100 m i llion 73 65 3,471 2,917

    5. M ore than `100 million

    and up to `500 m i llion 34 34 8,224 7,147

    6. M ore than `500 million

    and up to `1,000

    m i llion 8 11 5,079 6,910

    7. M ore than `1,000

    mi llion and up to

    `5,000 m i llion 6 8 8,309 19,052

    8. Above `5,000 m i lli on 15 12 1,028,388 1,131,913

    Tota l 2 1 7 1 9 6 1 ,0 5 4 ,3 1 2 1 ,1 6 8 ,6 7 6

    P: Provisional

    Source: Annual R eturns.

  • 8/13/2019 NBFCs.pdf

    13/22

    132

    Repor t on Trend and P rogres s of Banking in India 20 11-12

    increase in their operati ng profits duri ng 2011-12.

    T hi s increase in profit was m ainly on account of

    growth i n fund-based i ncome (T able V I .26) .

    E xpendi ture as a percentage to average total assets

    witnessed a m arginal increase duri ng 2011-12.

    T he same trend i s seen i n term s of incom e as a

    percentage to average total assets of NB FC s-D

    (C hart VI .7) .

    Soun dn ess In dicator s: Asset Quality of NBFCs-D

    De t e r i or a t i o n i n a s se t q u a l i t y o f NBF Cs -D

    segment

    6.32 D ur ing 2011-12, there was a signi ficant

    increase in the gross N PA s to total advances of

    NB FC s-D , whi ch is a deviati on from r ecent trends.

    Table VI.25: Break-up of Assets of

    NBFCs-D by Activity(Am ount in `billion)

    A ctivi ty As atend-M arch

    Per centageG rowth

    2011 2012P 2011-12P

    1 2 3 4

    L oans and A dvances 779

    (73.9)

    874

    (74.8)

    12.2

    I nvestments 211

    (20.0)

    192

    (16.4)

    -9.2

    O ther assets 64

    (6.1)

    103

    (8.8)

    60.0

    Total 1 ,0 5 4 1 ,1 6 9 10.8

    P: Provisional

    Note:Fi gures in parentheses are percentages to respective total .

    Source :Annual R eturns.

    Table VI.26 : Finan cial Perform an ce of NBFCs-D(Am ount in `billion)

    I tem As at end-M arch

    2011 2012P

    A. In com e (i+ ii) 1 5 2 1 8 1

    ( i ) Fund-B ased 151

    (99.2)

    180

    (99.3)

    ( i i ) Fee-B ased 1

    (0.8)

    1

    (0.7)

    B. Exp en d itu re (i+ ii+ iii) 1 0 9 1 3 3

    ( i ) Financial 68

    (62.3)

    81

    (60.9)

    of whichI nterest Payment 9

    (8.2)

    8

    (6.0)

    ( i i ) O perati ng 30

    (27.1)

    35

    (26.4)

    ( i i i ) O thers 11

    (10.5)

    17

    (12.8)

    C. Tax Provision s 1 4 1 6

    D. Op era t in g Profit (PBT) 4 3 4 8

    E. Net Profit (PAT) 2 9 3 3

    F. Tota l Assets 1 ,0 5 4 1 ,1 6 9

    G. Financial Ratios (as % to Total Assets)

    i ) I ncom e 14.4 15.5

    i i ) Fund Incom e 14.3 15.4

    i i i ) Fee I ncom e 0.0 0.1

    iv) E xpendi ture 10.4 11.4

    v) Financial E xpendi ture 0.1 6.9

    vi ) O perati ng E xpendi ture 2.8 3.0

    vi i ) T ax Provision 1.3 1.3

    vi i i ) Net Profi t 2.7 2.8

    H. Cost to In com e Rat io 7 2 .0 7 3 .3

    P: Provisional

    Note:1. Fi gures in par entheses are percentages to respecti ve total. 2. Percentage var iati on could be slightly di fferent because

    absolute num bers have been rounded off to `billion.

    Source: Annual R eturns.

    Table VI.27: NPA Ratios of NBFCs-D( per cent)

    A s at end-M arch G ross NPAs to

    Total Advances

    Net NPAs to

    Net Advances

    1 2 3

    2002 10.6 3.9

    2003 8.8 2.7

    2004 8.2 2.4

    2005 5.7 2.5

    2006 3.6 0.5

    2007 2.2 0.2

    2008 2.1 #

    2009 2.0 #

    2010 1.3 #

    2011 0.7 #

    2012 P 2.1 0.5

    P: Pr ovisional. # Provi sion exceeds NPA

    Source :H alf-Yearly returns on NB FC s-D .

  • 8/13/2019 NBFCs.pdf

    14/22

    133

    Non-Banking Financial Ins t i tut ion s

    Net NPAs which remained negative til l 2011 from

    2008, with provisions exceeding NPAs registered

    an increase of 0.5 per cent of total net advances

    as on M arch 31, 2012 (T able V I .27).

    6.33 T here was deteri oration in the asset quali ty

    of asset finance and loan com pani es dur ing 2011-

    12 as evident from an i ncrease in the gross N PAs

    to gr oss advances r ati o for th ese comp ani es

    (T able VI .28).

    I n ord er to i m pr ove transparency and

    understanding by borr owers, the R eserve B ank

    has issued a r evised fair practices code (Box V I .2) .

    T he Reserve Bank has revised the gui delines on Fair Pr acti ces Code(FPC) for all NBFCs issued on September 28, 2006 in the light of

    the recent developments in the N B FC sector. T he sali ent features of

    the revised ci rcular d ated M arch 26, 2012 are as follows:

    General

    (a) All comm unications to the borrower shall be in the vernacular

    language or a language as understood by the borrower.

    (b) L oan application forms should include necessary informati on

    that affects the interests of the borrower.

    (c) L oan agreement should contai n all details.

    (d) N BF C s should refrai n from i nterference in the affair s of the

    borr ower except for the pur poses provid ed in the terms and

    condi tions of the loan agreement.

    (e) I n the m atter of recovery of loans, the NB FC s should not resort

    to und ue harassm ent and ensure that the staffs are adequately

    trai ned to deal wi th customers.

    (f) T he Boar d of D ir ectors of N BF C s should also lay down the

    appropriate grievance redressal mechanism within the

    organisation.

    (g) T he Fair P ractices C ode should be put in place by all NB FC s

    with the approval of their B oards. T he same should be put up

    on their website.

    (h) Boar ds of NB FC s should lay out appropri ate internal principles

    and procedures to determ i ne in terest rates and pr ocessing

    and other charges.

    (i ) T he B oard of each N BF C shall adopt an interest rate m odeltak ing into account r elevant factors, such as cost of fund s,

    margins and risk premium .

    ( j) N BFC s m ust have a built-in r e-possession clause in the

    contract/loan agreem ent with the borrower wh ich m ust be

    legally enforceable.

    ( k ) T o ensure transparency, the term s and condi tions of the

    contract/loan agreem ent should also contain provi sions

    regardi ng: (a) noti ce peri od before tak in g possession; ( b)

    circum stances under whi ch the notice peri od can be waived;

    (c) the procedur e for tak in g possessi on of the securi ty; ( d) a

    provi sion regardi ng final chance to be given to the borr ower for

    repaym ent of loan before the sale / auction of the property; ( e)

    the procedur e for gi ving repossession to the borr ower and ( f)

    the procedur e for sale/ auction of the prop erty.

    NBFC-MFIs

    In additi on to the general pr inciples above, N B FC -M FI s are required

    to adopt the followi ng fair practices that are specific to their lending

    business and regulatory fram ework .

    (a) A statem ent shall be made in vernacular language and

    displayed by N BF C -M FI s in their premi ses and i n loan cards

    articulating their comm itm ent to tr ansparency and fair lending

    practices;

    (b) Fi eld staff should be trai ned to mak e necessary enquir i es with

    regard to exi sting debt of the borr owers, and trai ni ng, if any,

    offered to the borrowers shall be free of cost.

    Box VI.2: Guide lines on Fair P ract ices Code for NBFCs

    Table VI.28: NPAs of NBFCs-D by Classification of NBFCs(Am ount in `billion)

    C lassi fication/E nd-M arch G ross

    A dvances

    G ross NPAs Net A dvances Net NPAs

    Am ount % to G ross Advances Am ount % to Net Advances

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7

    Asset F i nan ce

    2010-11 517 3 0.5 508 -7 -1.4

    2011-12 P 663 16 2.3 651 3 0.5

    Loan Compan i e s

    2010-11 183 2 1.3 181 -0.1 0.0

    2011-12 P 208 3 1.6 206 2 0.8

    A l l Comp an i es

    2010-11 700 5 0.7 689 -7 -1.0

    2011-12 P 871 19 2.1 857 5 0.5

    P: Provisional

    Sour ce: H alf-Yearly returns on NB FC s-D .

    (Contd...)

  • 8/13/2019 NBFCs.pdf

    15/22

    134

    Repor t on Trend and P rogres s of Banking in India 20 11-12

    (c) T he effective rate of interest charged and the gri evance redr essal

    mechanism set up by the N BF C -M FI s should be promi nently

    di splayed in all i ts offices;

    (d ) A declaration that the M FI will be accountable for preventing

    in appropri ate staff behaviour and ti m ely grievance redressal

    shall be made i n the loan agreem ent;

    (e) A ll sanctioni ng and di sbursem ent of loans should be done only

    at a central location and more than one individual should be

    involved i n thi s function;

    (f) All NB FC -M FI s shall have a Board -approved standard form of

    loan agreem ent, pr eferabl y in the vernacular language;

    (g) T he loan card should reflect the details, in cluding the effective

    rate of i nterest charged;

    (h) N on-credi t products issued shall be with the full consent of

    borr owers and the fee structure shall be comm uni cated i n the

    loan card itself;

    ( i) R ecovery should norm ally be m ade only at a central designated

    place;

    (j ) N BF C -M FI s shall ensure that a B oard-approved policy is in

    place with regard to C ode of Cond uct by field staff.

    Lend ing against collater al of gold jewellery

    ( a) A dequate steps to ensure that the K YC gui delines stipulated

    by the RB I are com pli ed with and to ensure that adequate due

    di li gence is carr ied out on the customer before extending any

    loan.

    (b) Pr oper assaying procedure for the j ewellery received.

    (c) I nternal systems to satisfy ownershi p of the gold jewellery.

    (d) T he policy shall also cover putti ng in p lace adequate system s

    for stor ing the jewellery in safe custody, revi ewing the system s

    on an on-going basi s, train i ng the concerned staff and peri odi c

    inspection by in ternal aud itor s to ensure that the procedur es

    are stri ctly adhered to.

    (e) L oans agai nst the collateral of gold should not be extended by

    branches that do not have appropr i ate faci li ty for storage of the

    jewellery.

    ( f) T he jewellery accepted as collateral should be appropri ately

    insured.

    (g) T he Board-approved poli cy with regard to auction of jewellery

    in case of non-repayment shall be transparent and adequate

    pri or notice to the borr ower should be gi ven before the auction

    date.

    (h) T he auction should be announced to the publi c by i ssue of

    advertisements in at least 2 newspapers, one i n vernacular

    language and another in national daily newspaper.

    ( i) A s a poli cy the N BFC s themselves shall not par ticip ate in the

    auctions held.

    ( j) G old pledged wil l be auctioned only through auctioneers

    approved by the B oard.

    ( k ) T he poli cy shall also cover system s and procedur es to be put

    in place for dealing with fraud, including separation of duties

    of mobi lisation, execution and approval.

    (Concld...)

    6.34 T here was an increase in the shares of all

    three NPA categories of sub-standard, doubtful

    and loss assets of all compani es in 2011-12,

    Table VI.2 9: Classification of Asset s of NBFCs-D by Cate gory of NBFCs(Am ount in `billion)

    S tan dar d A ssets S ub -stan dar d A ssets D o ubt fu l A ssets L oss A ssets G r o ss NPAs G r o ss A dvan ces

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7

    Asset Finance Companies

    2010-11 515

    (99.5)

    2.1

    (0.4)

    0.3

    (0.1)

    0.1

    (0.0)

    2.5

    (0.5)

    517

    (100.0)

    2011-12P 648

    (97.7)

    10

    (1.5)

    4

    (0.5)

    2

    (0.3)

    15

    (2.3)

    663

    (100.0)

    Loan Companies

    2010-11 180

    (98.7)

    1

    (0.6)

    2

    (0.4)

    0

    (0.0)

    2

    (1.3)

    183

    (100.0)

    2011-12P 205

    (98.4)

    2

    (1.0)

    1

    (0.4)

    0.4

    (0.2)

    3

    (1.6)

    208

    (100.0)

    All Compa nies

    2010-11 695

    (99.3)

    3

    (0.5)

    2

    (0.1)

    0.1

    (0.0)

    5

    (0.7)

    700

    (100.0)

    2011-12P 852

    (97.8)

    12

    (1.4)

    4

    (0.5)

    2

    (0.3)

    19

    (2.2)

    871

    (100.0)

    P: Provisional

    Note: Figures in parentheses are per cent to total credit exposures.

    Source: H alf Yearly returns on NB FC s-D.

    underlining the marginal deterioration in asset

    quali ty of these institutions. T his mai nly em anated

    from asset finance companies (T able V I .29) .

  • 8/13/2019 NBFCs.pdf

    16/22

    135

    Non-Banking Financial Ins t i tut ion s

    Table VI.30 : Capital Adequ acy Ratio of

    NBFCs-D(N umber of companies)

    C R AR R ange 2010-11 2011-12P

    AFC L C Total AFC L C Total

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7

    1) L ess than 12 per cent 1 1 2 1 1 2

    a) L ess than 9 per cent 1 1 2 1 1 2

    b) M ore than 9 per cent

    and up to 12 per cent

    0 0 0 0 0 0

    2) M ore than 12 per cent

    and up to 15 per cent

    1 2 3 1 0 1

    3) M ore than 15 per cent

    and up to 20 per cent

    5 3 8 8 3 11

    4) M ore than 20 per cent

    and up to 30 per cent

    19 3 22 16 2 18

    5) A bove 30 per cent 142 27 169 131 27 158

    Total 1 6 8 3 6 2 0 4 1 5 7 3 3 1 9 0

    P: Provisional

    Note: AF C -Asset Fi nance Compani es; LC -Loan C ompanies

    Source: H alf-yearly retur ns.

    Table VI.31: Net Owned Fun d vis--vis

    Public Deposits of NBFCs-D

    by Classification(Am ount in `billion)

    C lassi fication Net O wned Fund Public D eposi ts

    2010-11 2011-12P 2010-11 2011-12P

    1 2 3 4 5

    Asset Finance C om panies 108 139 36

    (0.3)

    45

    (0.3)

    L oan C om panies 42 56 4

    (0.1)

    13

    (0.2)

    Tota l 1 5 0 1 9 5 4 1

    (0.3)

    5 8

    (0 .3)

    P: Provisional.

    Note:Figures in parentheses are ratio of public deposits to net owned

    funds.

    Source: Annual R eturns.

    6.35 A t end-M arch 2012, of 190 r eporti ng

    NB FC s, 187 had CR AR of m ore than 15 per cent

    (T able V I .30). T his could be an indi cation that the

    N B FC sector i s undergoi ng a consoli dati on

    pr ocess in the past few years, wherein weak er

    NB FC s are gradually exi ting and paving the way

    for stronger ones. T he ratio of publi c deposi ts to

    Net O wned Funds (N O F) of NB FC s tak en together

    has mor e or less remai ned sam e as at end-M arch

    2012 (T able V I .31) . T here was a si gni f icant

    increase in NO F and publi c deposi ts of N BFC s-D

    dur ing 2011-12. T he increase in N O F was m ainly

    concentrated in the category of `5,000 mi llion and

    above (T able V I .32).

    Residu ary Non-Ban kin g Com pan ies (RNBCs)

    RNBCs are in the process of m igra t in g to other

    busin ess m odels

    6.36 T he assets of R N BC s decli ned by 34 per

    cent dur i ng the year ended M arch 2012. T he

    assets m ai nl y consi st of i nvestm ents i n

    unencumbered approved securities, bonds/

    debentures and fixed deposits/certificates of

    deposit of SC B s. T he N O F of R N B C s has also

    registered a decli ne of 52.2 per cent i n 2011-12

    (Table VI.33). T he decli ne in the expendi ture of

    R NBC s dur ing 2011-12 was m ore than the decline

    Table VI.32: Range of Net Owned Funds vis--vis Public Deposits of NBFCs-D(Am ount in `m ill ion)

    R ange of NoF 2010-11 2011-12P

    No. of

    Companies

    Net O wned

    Fund

    Public

    D eposits

    No. of

    Companies

    Net O wned

    Fund

    Public

    D eposits

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7

    Up to `2.5 m i llion 2 -2,003 324 1 -1 1.2

    M ore than `2.5 million and up to `20 m i llion 113 838 320 89 750 242

    M ore than `20 million and up to `100 m i llion 65 2,662 1,359 67 2,894 1,271

    M ore than `100 million and up to `500 m i llion 20 4,529 1,133 21 4,468 1,252

    M ore than `500 million and up to `1000 mi llion 2 1,204 1,038 4 2,869 817

    M ore than `1000 million and up to `5000 m i llion 7 17,118 4,526 7 13,876 15,612

    A bove `5000 m i llion 8 1,25,527 31,923 7 1,69,792 39,212

    Total 2 1 7 1 ,4 9 ,8 7 4 4 0 ,6 2 3 1 9 6 1 ,9 4 ,6 4 8 5 8 ,4 0 6

    P: Provisional

    Note: Fi gures in parentheses are publi c deposits as r atio of r especti ve net owned fund.

    Source :Annual returns

  • 8/13/2019 NBFCs.pdf

    17/22

    136

    Repor t on Trend and P rogres s of Banking in India 20 11-12

    i n i ncom e, as a result of whi ch the operating

    profits of R N BC s increased dur ing the year. As a

    result of decline in the provision for taxation, the

    net profits of R NB C s increased sharp ly dur ing

    2011-12.

    Regional Patt ern of Deposits of RNBCs

    6.37 At end-M arch 2012, there were two R NBCs,

    registered wi th the R eserve B ank . O ne each i s

    located i n central and eastern r egions. B oth the

    R N B C s are in the process of m igrating to other

    business models and have been directed to reduce

    their deposit liabilities to nil by 2015. Public

    deposi ts held by the two R N B C s regi stered a

    Table VI.3 3: Pro file o f RNBCs(Am ount in `mi ll ion)

    I tem 2010-11 2011-12P Percentage

    Variation

    2010-11 2011-12P

    1 2 3 4 5

    A. Assets (i to v) 1 ,1 4 ,6 7 0 7 5 ,4 3 0 -26.6 -34.2

    (i ) Investment in

    U nencum bered

    Approved Secur i ti es 13,080 8,380 -47.0 -36.0

    (i i) Investment in

    Fi xed D eposits

    / Certificate

    of D eposits

    of S cheduled

    Comm. B anks/

    Public Financial

    I nsti tutions 26,520 13,900 -45.4 -47.6

    (i ii ) D ebentures/Bonds/Commercial

    Papers of G ovt.

    Companies/Public

    Sector B ank s/

    Public Financial

    Institution/

    C orporation 28,760 7,510 -45.6 -73.9

    ( i v) O ther I nvestments 490 4,330 -96.2 784.3

    ( v) O ther A ssets 45,820 41,310 166.6 -9.8

    B. Net Owned Fun d 29,880 14,270 2.3 -52.2

    C. Total Income (i+ ii) 11,590 3,320 -40.4 -71.3

    ( i ) Fund I ncome 11,280 2,940 -41.3 -73.9

    ( i i ) Fee I ncom e 310 380 19.2 24.1

    D. Total Expen ses ( i+ i i+i i i ) 10,060 1,660 -28.1 -83.5

    ( i ) Financial C ost 6,310 460 -35.2 -92.7

    ( i i ) O perating C ost 3,680 520 7.3 -85.9

    ( i i i ) O ther C ost 70 680 -91.6 876.9

    E. Taxation 620 570 -62.2 -8.1

    F. Operat ing Prof i t (PBT) 1,530 1,670 -72.0 8.9

    G. Net Profit (PAT) 910 1,100 -76.2 20.5

    P: Provisional. PB T : Profit Before T ax. PAT : Profit After T ax.

    Source: Annual returns

    signi ficant decli ne in 2011-12, m ainly due to a

    substantial decli ne in the deposi ts held by S IFC L

    (T able VI .34).

    Investmen t Pat tern of RNBCs

    6.38 Following the decline in deposits, there was

    a decli ne in the investments of RNB Cs in 2011-12.

    T he decline was noti ceable in all segm ents of

    investment (T able V I .35).

    NBFCs-ND-SI

    Though bo r r ow ing f r om ba nk s i s si zab l e , a

    substan t ia l increase in bor row ings by w ay of

    debentures wa s w i tnessed

    6.39 T he assets of NB FC s-N D -SI for the year

    ended M arch 2012 showed an increase of 21 per

    Table VI.34: P ub lic Deposits Held b y

    RNBCs Region -wise(Am ount in `billion)

    I tem 2010-11 2011-12P

    No. of

    R N B C s

    Public

    D eposits

    No. of

    R N B C s

    Public

    D eposits

    1 2 3 4 5

    C entral 1 53

    (66.9)

    1 21

    (50.0)

    E astern 1 26

    (33.1)

    1 21

    (50.0)

    Total 2 79 2 42

    Met r opo l i t an C i t i e s

    K olk ata 1 26 1 21

    Total 1 26 1 21

    P: Provisional

    Note: Fi gures in p arentheses are percentages to r especti ve totals.Source :A nnual returns.

    Table VI.35. In vestm ent Patte rn of RNBCs(Am ount in `m ill ion)

    I tem 2010-11 2011-12P

    1 2 3

    Aggr ega te Lia bilit ie s to t he De p os it or s (ALD) 7 9 ,0 2 0 4 2 ,6 5 0

    ( i) U nencum ber ed appr oved secur iti es 13, 080

    (16.6)

    8,380

    (19.6)

    ( i i ) Fixed D eposi ts wi th bank s 26,520

    (33.6)

    13,900

    (32.6)

    (i ii ) B onds or debentures or comm ercial papers

    of a G ovt. C ompan y / publi c sector bank /

    public financial I nstituti on / corporations

    28,760

    (36.4)

    7,510

    (17.6)

    ( i v) O ther I nvestm ents 490

    (0.6)

    4,330

    (10.2)

    P: Provisional

    Note: Fi gures in par entheses as percentages to AL D s.

    Source :A nnual returns.

  • 8/13/2019 NBFCs.pdf

    18/22

    137

    Non-Banking Financial Ins t i tut ion s

    cent. T otal borrowings (secured and unsecured)

    by N BFC s-ND -SI showed a signi ficant increase of

    23.6 per cent, consti tuting m ore than two-thi rd

    of the total l i abili t ies ( T able V I .36) . S ecured

    borrowings consti tuted the lar gest source of funds

    for N B FC s-N D -S I , fo l lowed by unsecur ed

    borr owings, reserves and surplus.

    Table VI.36 : Consolida ted Balan ce Sh eet of

    NBFCs-ND-SI(A mount in ` billion)

    I tem 2010-11 2011-12 Var iation

    (Per cent)

    1 2 3 4

    1 . Sh are Cap ita l 3 8 2 5 0 5 3 2 .1

    2. R eserves & Surplus 1,599 1,901 18.9

    3 . Total Borrowin gs 5 ,1 7 5 6 ,3 9 8 2 3 .6

    A. Secu red Borrowin gs 2 ,9 1 5 3 ,7 7 0 2 9 .3

    A .1. D ebentures 984 1,732 76.0

    A .2. B orrowings from B ank s 1,006 1,441 43.2

    A .3. B orrowings from FI s 103 90 -12.7

    A .4. I nterest Accrued 52 63 22.9

    A .5. O thers 770 444 -42.3

    B. Un -Secu red Borrowin gs 2 ,2 6 0 2 ,6 2 8 1 6 .3

    B .1. D ebentures 753 1,218 61.7

    B .2. B orrowings from B ank s 461 436 -5.3

    B .3. B orrowings from FI s 31 53 74.0

    B .4. B orrowings from R elatives 13 12 -9.5 B .5. I nter-C orporate B orrowings 242 278 14.5

    B .6. C om m ercial Paper 314 306 -2.8

    B .7. I nterest Accrued 44 69 59.0

    B .8. O thers 401 256 -36.3

    4. C urrent L iabi li ties & P rovi sions 457 409 -10.6

    Total Liab ilit ies/ Tota l Assets 7 ,6 1 3 9 ,2 1 3 2 1 .0

    Assets

    1. L oans & Advances 4,709 5,900 25.3

    1.1. Secured 3,406 4,486 31.7

    1.2. U n-Secured 1,304 1,414 8.5

    2. H i re Purchase A ssets 502 635 26.5

    3. Investm ents 1,507 1,595 5.9

    3.1. L ong-T erm Investm ents 1,089 1,227 12.6

    3.2. C urrent I nvestm ents 417 368 -11.7

    4. C ash & Bank B alances 313 357 14.0

    5. O ther C urrent A ssets 437 553 26.5

    6. O ther Assets 144 173 19.9

    Memo I tems

    1. C api tal M ark et E xposure 822 799 -2.8

    Of w hich: E qui ty Shares 347 253 -27.0

    2. C M E as per cent to T otal Assets 10.8 8.7

    3. L everage R atio 2.84 2.83 2.95

    Notes: Percentage var iati on could be slightly di fferent because absolute

    num bers have been r ounded off to `billion.

    Source: M onthly returns on ND -SI (`1 billi on and above).

    Table VI.37 : Borr owings of NBFCs-ND-SI

    Sector by Region(Am ount in `billion)

    R egion As at end

    M ar ch 2011 M ar ch 2012P J une 2012P

    1 2 3 4

    North 2,707 3,431 3,502

    E ast 231 329 368

    West 1,383 1,512 1,594

    South 854 1,127 1,193

    Tota l Borrowin gs 5 ,1 7 5 6 ,3 9 8 6 ,6 5 7

    P: Provisional

    Source :M onthly returns on N BFC s-ND -SI .

    6.40 T he N B FC s-N D -SI segm ents i s growing

    rapidly. Borr owings compr ise thei r largest source

    of funds, m ostly sourced from bank s and financial

    insti tutions. T o the extent that they rely on bank

    financing, there is an indirect exposure to

    depositors. Whi le the concentration of fundi ng has

    ri sk s, the caps on bank lendi ng to NB FC s m ay

    constrain their growth. H owever, the leverage ratio

    of the NB FC s-N D -SI sector rem ains the same as

    in the previous year.

    Borro wings of NBFCs-ND-SI b y Region

    Northern Region cont i nu ed to be m ain sour ce of

    funds

    6.41 Analysis of region-wise borrowings of the

    N B FC s-ND -SI reveals the dominance of northern

    and western r egions; together they constitute m ore

    than 70 per cent of the total borrowings during

    the year ended M arch 2012. T he sam e trend

    continued during the quarter ended June 2012.

    All regions registered growth during both the year

    ended M arch 2012 and quarter ended June 2012

    (T able VI .37).

    Financia l Performan ce

    NBFCs-ND-SI show ed deter io ra t ion in f inan c ia l

    perform an ce an d increase in NPAs

    6.42 T he financial perform ance of the N BFC s-

    N D -SI sector deter iorated m arginally as reflected

    in the decline in net profi t dur ing 2011-12 ( T able

    V I .38) . B oth G ross and N et NPAs to total asset of

    the NB FC s-ND -SI sector i ncreased dur ing the year.

  • 8/13/2019 NBFCs.pdf

    19/22

    138

    Repor t on Trend and P rogres s of Banking in India 20 11-12

    Table VI.38: Fina ncial Perform an ce of

    NBFCs-ND-SI Sector(Am ount in ` billion)

    I tem As at end

    M arch

    2011

    M arch

    2012

    June

    2012

    1 2 3 4

    1. T otal I ncom e 752 948 263

    2. T otal E xpendi ture 529 740 192

    3. Net Profi t 160 139 51

    4. T otal Assets 7,613 9,213 9,608

    Financial R atios

    ( i ) I ncome to Total Assets (per cent) 9.9 10.3 2.7

    ( i i ) E xpendi ture to Total Assets (per cent) 6.9 8.0 1.9

    ( i i i ) N et Profi t to T otal I ncom e (per cent) 21.3 14.6 19.4

    ( iv) Net Profi t to Total Assets (per cent) 2.1 1.5 0.5

    Source: M onthly returns on ND -SI (`1billi on and above).

    than 15 per cent ( T able V I .40) . T hese compani es

    were also largely dependent on nationali sed bank sfor thei r term loans, work ing capital loans and

    debentures/C Ps. N ew pr ivate sector bank s have

    emerged as a second m ajor bank group for these

    companies to rai se term loans and work ing capital

    loans (Table VI.41).

    4. Pr im ary Dealers

    6.44 T here were 21 Pr im ary D ealers (P D s)

    operating in the financial m ark ets as on June 30,

    2012. O f them , 13 were run by bank s as a

    departm ent called B ank -PD s, and the remaining

    8 were non-bank enti ties k nown as standalone

    PD s registered as NB FC s under Section 45 I A of

    the R BI Act, 1934.

    Operations an d Performa nce of PDs

    6.45 D uri ng 2011-12, the bid to cover ratio of

    PD s in both dated G overnm ent of Indi a securi ties

    (G -Sec) and T reasury B i lls (T-B i lls) was m arginally

    T he sam e trend contin ued as on J une 2012

    (Table VI.39).

    6.43 As on M arch 31, 2012, the m ajor i ty of the

    reporting companies maintained the stipulated

    minimum norm of 15 per cent capital adequacy

    as m easured by C R AR . O nly 10 per cent of the

    total reporti ng compani es have a CR AR of less

    Table VI.39 : NPA Ratios of NBFCs-ND-SI S ect or( per cent)

    I tem A s at end

    M arch

    2011

    M arch

    2012

    June

    2012

    1 2 3 4

    ( i ) G ross NPA s to G ross Advances 1.72 2.08 2.26

    ( i i ) Net NPAs to Net Advances 0.69 1.25 1.37

    ( i i i ) G ross NPA s to T otal Assets 1.28 1.48 1.61

    ( iv) Net NPAs to Total Assets 0.51 0.88 0.97

    Source: M onthly returns on ND -SI (` 1 billi on and above).

    Table VI.41: Bank Exposure of NBFCs-ND-SI Sector

    (A s at end-M arch 2012)

    (Am ount in `billion)

    Bank G roup T erm L oans Work ing C api tal L oans D ebentures C om mercial Paper O thers Total

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7

    A . Nationalised B ank s 959 282 81 18 73 1,412

    B. State B ank G roup 102 97 21 0.3 27 247

    C . O ld Private B ank s 38 27 10 2 2 79

    D . New Private B ank s 140 53 53 11 11 268

    E . Foreign B ank s 72 34 9 3 5 123

    All Ban ks 1 ,3 1 0 4 9 2 1 7 5 3 5 1 1 7 2 ,1 3 0

    Source: M onthly R eturns on ND -SI s (`1 billi on and above).

    Table VI.40 : Capital Adequ acy Ratio of

    NBFCs-ND-SI - By Type of NBFC(N umber of companies)

    C R AR R ange A FC I FC I C L C Total

    1 2 3 4 5 6

    L ess than 15 per cent 0 0 21 15 36

    15 per cent to 20 per cent 5 1 8 20 34

    20 per cent to 25 per cent 2 2 5 14 23

    25 per cent to 30 per cent 3 0 6 4 13

    Above 30 per cent 8 1 171 79 259

    Tota l 1 8 4 2 1 1 1 3 2 3 6 5

    Note: AF C - A sset Fi nance C omp anies; IFC - In frastructure Finan ce

    Companies; IC - Investment Companies; LC - Loan Companies

    Source: Q uarterly Returns on NB FC s-ND -SI .

  • 8/13/2019 NBFCs.pdf

    20/22

    139

    Non-Banking Financial Ins t i tut ion s

    lower than in the previous year. PD s were requi red

    to achieve a m inim um success ratio (bids accepted

    to the bidding commitment) of 40 per cent for

    T-B ills and Cash M anagem ent Bi lls (C M B s) put

    together, usually reviewed on a half-yearly basis.

    A ll the PD s achieved the stipulated m i nim um

    success rati o in both the fir st and second half of

    2011-12. T he success ratio in T-B i ll auctions,

    however, was m arginally lower dur ing the year.

    6.46 D ur ing 2011-12, all the dated G -Secs were

    fully underwritten. In the auctions of dated

    securi ti es, the share of the PD s (bi ds accepted to

    the secur i ties issued) decreased mar ginally (T able

    V I .42) . Par tial devolvem ent on the PD s took place

    on 14 instances.

    Performa nce of Standalone P Ds

    6.47 I n the secondar y m ar k et, PD s have

    individually achieved a minimum annual total

    turnover ratio2 (outright and repo transactions)

    of 5 tim es in dated G -Sec and 10 tim es in T -B i lls

    dur i ng 2011-12. P D s had also achi eved the

    minim um annual outri ght turnover ratio of 3 tim es

    in dated G -Sec and 6 tim es in T-B il ls (T able V I .43).

    Sources an d Applicat ion of Fund s of

    S tanda lone PDs

    Investm ent by PDs in corpora t e bond m ark et

    ha s decreased

    6.48 T he net owned fund (N O F) of the PD s hasincreased m arginally. R eserves and surplus of the

    PD s had i ncreased signi ficantly. B oth the secured

    and unsecured loans of the PD s also increased

    significantly during 2011-12. Investments in

    corporate bonds decreased m arginally dur ing the

    year (Table VI.44).

    Financia l Performa nce of Stand alone PDs

    Shar p increase in expenses led to reduct ion in

    pro f i t

    6.49 T he net pr of i t of the P D s r educed

    m arginally dur ing 2011-12. T he total i ncome of

    the PD s increased signifi cantly. H owever, the PD s

    reported a sharp increase in their interest

    expenses m ai nly due to the increased cost of

    borr owings ( T able V I .45) . A s a result, the cost-

    income ratio ( i .e. , operating expenses to net total

    2 Turn over r atio is com puted as the rati o of total purchase and sales dur i ng the year in the secondar y m ark et to average m onth-

    end stock s.

    Table VI.42: Perform an ce of th e PDs

    in the Pr im ary Market

    (A s at end-M arch)

    (Am ount in ` billion)

    I tem 2011 2012

    1 2 3

    Treasu ry Bills & CMBs

    B idding C om mitm ent 3,808 7,296

    Actual B ids Subm itted 7,260 13,505

    B id to C over R atio 2.3 2.2

    B ids Accepted 2,353 4,271

    Success R atio ( in per cent) 61.8 58.6

    Central Govt. Securit ies

    Noti fied A m ount 4,370 5,100

    Actual B ids submi tted 6,239 6,932

    B id to C over R atio 1.4 1.3

    B ids of PD s A ccepted 2,165 2,432

    Share of PD s ( in per cent) 49.6 47.7

    Note : Percentage variation could be slightly different because absolute

    num bers have been r ounded off to `billion.

    Table VI.43: Performance of Standalone

    PDs in the Second ary Market

    ( As at end-M arch)

    (Am ount in ` billion)

    I tem 2011 2012

    1 2 3

    Outright

    Turnover of standalone PD s 10,900 18,381

    Turnover of mark et participants 57,419 69,764

    Share of PD s ( in per cent) 19.0 26.3

    Repo

    Turnover of standalone PD s 11,460 15,245

    Turnover of mark et participants 81,986 75,278

    Share of PD s ( in per cent) 14.0 20.3

    Total

    Turnover of standalone PD s 22,359 33,625

    Turnover of mark et participants 1,39,405 1,45,042

    Share of PD s ( in per cent) 16.0 23.2

    Notes : 1. Percentage vari ati on could be slightly di fferent because

    absolute num bers have been rounded off to `billion.

    2. C omp onents may not add up to the whole due to round in g

    off.

    Source: Clearing Corporation of India L im ited.

  • 8/13/2019 NBFCs.pdf

    21/22

    140

    Repor t on Trend and P rogres s of Banking in India 20 11-12

    income) increased duri ng the year. T he return on

    net worth ( R O N W) and r eturn on average assets

    (R O AA) for the year ended M arch 2012 were down

    m arginally (T able V I 46). T he C R AR of the PD s

    increased from 46.2 per cent to 53.8 per cent

    dur ing the year as against a m inim um prescri bed

    requir em ent of 15 per cent (T able V I 47) .

    Table VI.44 : Sources a nd Appl ica t ions of Fun ds of Stan dalone Prim ary Dealers(Am ount in ` mill ion)

    I tem As at end-M arch Percentage Var iation

    2010 2011$ 2012 2011 2012

    1 2 3 4 5 6

    Sou rces of Fu n ds 1 ,0 3 ,0 8 0 1 3 0 ,3 2 0 2 ,0 3 ,8 1 0 2 6 .4 5 6 .4

    1 C api tal 15,410 15,210 15,080 -1.3 -0.8

    2 R eserves and Surplus 19,250 18,890 20,490 -1.9 8.4

    3 L oans (a + b) 68,420 96,220 168,240 40.7 74.9

    a) Secured 25,220 63,520 113,970 151.9 79.4

    b) U nsecured 43,200 32,700 54,260 -24.3 66.0

    Ap p licat ion of Fu n d s 1 ,0 3 ,0 8 0 1 ,3 0 ,3 2 0 2 ,0 3 ,8 1 0 2 6 .4 5 6 .4

    1 Fixed Assets 140 380 370 171.4 -2.6

    2 Investm ents (a + b + c) 72,800 98,520 1,45,080 35.3 47.3

    a) G overnm ent Secur i ties 62,518 86,430 1,33,320 38.1 54.2

    b) C om m ercial Papers 1,420 100 250 -92.9 149.4

    c) C orporate B onds 8,800 11,990 11,510 36.2 -4.0

    3 L oans and Advances 7,410 4,260 19,380 -42.5 354.9

    4 Non-current A ssets 0 0 2,970 - -

    5 Equity, M utual Funds, et c. 680 250 160 -63.2 -36.0

    6 O thers* 22,050 26,910 35,850 22.0 33.2

    * O thers include cash + certi ficate of deposits + bank balances + accrued in terest + deferr ed tax assets current liabi li ties and provisions.

    $: E xcept M organ Stanley D eutsche Sec and I D BI G ilts.

    Notes : 1. Percentage vari ati on could be slightly di fferent because of round in g off.

    2. Com ponents may not add up to the whole due to round in g off.

    Source : A nnual R eports of PD s.

    Table VI.45: Fina ncial Perform an ce of

    Stan dalone Primary Dealers(Am ount in ` mill ion)

    I tem 2010-11 2011-12 Variation

    Amount Percentage

    1 2 3 4 5

    A. In com e (i to iii) 1 0 ,7 9 0 1 5 ,4 7 0 4 ,6 8 0 4 3 .4

    i) Interest and

    discount

    9,700 13,820 4,120 42.5

    i i ) T radi ng Profi t 580 640 60 10.3

    i i i ) O ther income 510 1,010 500 98.0

    B. Exp en ses (i+ ii) 8 ,0 7 0 1 3 ,0 7 0 4 ,5 6 0 6 2 .0

    i ) Interest 6,530 11,180 4,650 71.2

    ii ) O ther expenses

    including

    E stablishment and

    Administrative

    Costs

    1,540 1,890 350 22.7

    Profit Before Tax 2,720 2,400 -320 -11.8

    Profit After Tax 1,780 1,540 -240 -13.5

    Notes : 1. Percentage vari ati on could be sli ghtly di fferent because

    absolute num bers have been rounded off to `billion.

    2. C omp onents m ay not add up to the whole due to round in g off.

    Source : R eturns submi tted by PD s.

    Table VI.46 : Finan cial Indicat ors of

    S tanda lone PDs

    (Am ount in ` mill ion)

    I ndicator 2010-11 2011-12

    1 2 3

    i ) Net profi t 1,780 1,540

    i i ) Average Assets 1,66,970 1,97,460

    i i i ) R eturn on Average Assets ( in per cent) 1.1 0.8

    iv) R eturn on Net Worth ( i n per cent) 5.1 4.4

    Table VI.47: CRAR of the s ta nd alone P Ds

    ( As at end-M arch)

    (Am ount in ` mill ion)

    Particulars 2011 2012

    1 2 3

    1. T otal Net C api tal Funds 36,260 39,290

    2. T otal R isk Weighted Assets 78,580 72,980

    a) C redi t R isk 33,500 37,420

    b) M ark et R i sk 45,080 35,560

    3. CRAR ( in percent) 4 6 .2 5 3 .8

  • 8/13/2019 NBFCs.pdf

    22/22

    141

    Non-Banking Financial Ins t i tut ion s

    5. Overa l l Assessm ent s

    6.50 T here wer e signs of a consoli dati on

    process in the NB FC sector i n term s of num berof NB FC s. T he balance sheets of NB FC s have,

    however, showed substantial expansion and

    sim i lar expansion was observed i n respect of FI s

    and P D s. T he fi nanci al perform ance of the

    N B FC s-D segm ent has witnessed im provem ent

    as reflected i n the increase in their operating

    pr of its m ain ly em anatin g from fund-based

    income. H owever, the financial perform ance of

    the N B FC s-N D -SI segm ent has deter i orated

    m arginally, though the sector i s growing faster.

    B orrowings consti tute the largest source of funds

    m ostly sourced fr om bank s and f i nanci al

    insti tutions for N B FC s. T hus, the heavy reli ance

    on bank financing needs to be m oni tored closely.

    I n th is context, the recent r egulator y measures

    leading to tightening of norm s with respect to

    raising of resources from bank s is expected to

    br ing down the NB FC sectors reliance on the

    bank ing sector and to look for alternate sources

    of funds.

    6.51 I n term s of NPA s, there was a signi ficant

    increase in the gross N PA s to total advances of

    N B FC s. S im i larly, FI s have registered an increase

    in N PAs. T he N B FI s as a segm ent continue to be

    better placed i n term s of capi tal adequacy with

    h ig h C R A R than the m in i m um regu la tory

    requir em ent. I n r espect of pr im ary dealers, while

    their i nterest i ncome i ncreased, expenses

    enhanced at a faster pace due to the increased

    cost of borr owings, leading to reduced pr ofit and

    lower R oA.