Naveed tariq
-
Upload
naveedtariqmalik -
Category
Education
-
view
1.046 -
download
6
Transcript of Naveed tariq
Kindly refer to final report submitted by Mr. Shah Rukh
Khan Niazi Assistant Director (Investigation) ACE Lahore Region
Lahore.
Brief facts of the case are that Case FIR No. 541/2009,
offence u/s 420/468/471 PPC, Police Station Kahna Lahore was
registered and investigated by local police and report u/s 173 Cr.
PC was submitted by the local police after having found the
accused guilty of the offence ans submit report u/s 173 Cr. PC to
the prosecutor but report u/s 173 Cr. PC was sent back with the
observation by the Assistant District Public Prosecutor, with thye
observation that public servant i.e. Muhammad Slaeem Patwari is
involved in the commission of offence. So, the case was
transferred to this establishment. The accused public servant has
been expired as per report of IO of local police namely Muhammad
Akram ASI. The remaining accused persons are on bail.
Judicial action as recommended by the IO in his final
report may be approved against Nazir Ahmad, Abdul Rauf,
Muhammad Sharif, Sadiq and Muhammad Akbar.
Accused Muhammad Saleem Patwari has been expired
so criminal proceeding against him automatically stand abated.
However, Investigating Officer before submission of
challan u/s 173 Cr. PC, following documents may be taken into
possession:-
1. Statement of present Halqa Patwari.
2. Attested copies of mutations in question.
3. Death Certificate of Muhammad Saleem Patwari
(Deceased)
MALIK NAVEED TARIQ (ADP)Anti Corruption Establishment,
Lahore Region, Lahore.L/DDP:-
Kindly refer to Para No. 12 to 17-N and final report dated
11.05.2012 submitted by Mr. Raees Ahmad Khan Circle Officer
ACE Head Quarter Lahore.
Earlier final report was submitted by Mr. SD Khalid the
then DDI-III, ACE Lahore, for approval of judicial action against 12
accused but legal branch raised some legal objection that
determine the role of each accused person, collect the evidence
and record their statements u/s 161 Cr. PC. Meanwhile after the
transfer of Mr. SD Khalid the then DDI-III, ACE Lahore, file was
transferred to Circle Officer Head Quarter for removal of objection
raised by legal branch and submission of RFR.
I have examine the file and found that CO/IO has not
fulfill the requirement as raised by legal branch and record the
statement of only one accused namely Mushtaq Girdawar.
Investigating Officer is directed to determine the role of
each accused, record their statements u/s 161 Cr. PC, collect
attested copies of mutations and sale deeds in question and
submit RFR on merits, if agreed please.
MALIK NAVEED TARIQ (ADP)Anti Corruption Establishment,
Lahore Region, Lahore.L/DDP:-
Kindly refer to Para No. 5 to 7-N and revised final report dated
30.04.2012 submitted by Mr. Raees Ahmad Khan Circle Officer
ACE Head Quarter Lahore.
Earlier Judicial Action against Nasir Rauf, Muhammad
Arshad, Patwari, Muhammad Umair, Muhammad Akram and
Departmental action against Rasheed Ahmad, Patwari, Muhammad
Mansha, Girdawar, Saman Jan Tehsildar was approved by the
competent authority on 12.03.2012. Meanwhile Muhammad
Arshad, Patwari submitted an application before Worthy Director
stating, thathe was not called to submit his defense verion and in
he also submitted some reports of revenue officials in his favour,
on which Worthy Director ask Ciricle Officer Head Quarter for
comments/report who after recording the version of Muhammad
Arshad Patwari, submitted a revised final report declaring him
innocent in this case. IO has already submitted an incomplete
challan on 21.03.2012 in the court. Now he recommended to
submit the complete report u/s 173 Cr. PC, putting Muhammad
Arshad Patwari in coloumn No.2 of report u/s 173 Cr. PC.
I have gone through the record and final report dated
12.03.2012, I endorse the recommendation of the IO and I.O may
be directed to submit cancellation report u/s 173 Cr PC in the
Court of competent jurisdiction at the earliest, if agreed please.
MALIK NAVEED TARIQ (ADP)Anti Corruption Establishment,
Lahore Region, Lahore.
L/DDP:-
Kindly refer to Para No. 10 to 13-N and final report dated
15.05.2012 submitted by Mr. Hassan Raza Khan DDI ACE and Mr.
Raees Ahmad Khan Circle Officer ACE Head Quarter Lahore.
Earlier Judicial Action against Shahzad Ahmad constable
and Departmental action against Ghulam Abbas Inspector and Ijaz
Hussain Gillani DSP (Legal) was recommended by Mr. Riaz Ahmad
Assistant Director Investigation in his final report dated
12.04.2012, but subsequently His Lordship Mr. Justice Mazahir Ali
Akbar Naqvi called Worthy Director General ACE Punjab on
08.05.2012, who undertakes for constituting a team to investigate
the issue and submit report in this regard within seven days and
Worthy DG ACE Punjab constituted team comprising Mr. Hassan
Raza DDI ACE Lahore and Mr. Raees Ahmad Khan Circle Officer
Head Quarter, Lahore. They after conducting Investigation
submitted a Final Report Dated 15.05.2012 and they differ with
the opinion of previous IO and recommended Judicial Action
against Shahzad Ahmad constable, Ghulam Abbas Inspector and
dropped case against Ijaz Hussain Gillani DSP (Legal).
After examining the record it transpired that earlier on
09.02.2012 Mr. Zaffar Iqbal Judicial MagistrateSection-30,
discharged the accused namely Ghulam Abbas inspector on
09.02.2012 stating as under:-
“It is clear from the record that till yet no
material evidence has been collected against the accused
regarding the commission of offence with malafide
intention and it is not in the interest of justice to curtail his
liberty by sending him to judicial lock up. Hence, at this
juncture, he is discharged in this case. He is responsible
public servant and there is no chance of his escape. I.O.
may take legal action against him in accordance with law if
he finds any material evidence against him during
investigation. Accused be released if not required in any
other case.”
I have gone through the record and final report dated
15.05.2012, it reveals from order dated 25.11.2011 of Honorable
Lahore High Court, Lahore it was the responsibility of Ghulam
Abbas Inspector to hand over the parcel containing material
importanat documents himself, negligence and criminal
misconduct is available against both the accused namely Shahzad
Ahmad constable, Ghulam Abbas Inspector. Judical action against
Shahzad Ahmad constable has already been recommended. Now
investigating team has recommended Judicial Action against
Ghulam Abbas Inspector also and dropped case against Ijaz
Hussain Gillani DSP (Legal).
I endorse the recommendation of the investigating
team and recommend Judicial Action against Ghulam Abbas
Inspector and dropped case against Ijaz Hussain Gillani DSP
(Legal), if agreed please.
MALIK NAVEED TARIQ (ADP)Anti Corruption Establishment,
Lahore Region, Lahore.
L/DDP:-
The final report, opinion of ADP & file have been perused. I
endorse the opinion of ADP to approve judicial action against Ghulam
Abbas, Inspector & to drop the case against the Ejaz Hussain Gilani, DSP
as he performed his duty diligently judicial action against Shahzad
Ahmed, Constable has already been approved.
DEPUTY DIRECTOR (PROSECUTION)Anti Corruption Establishment,
Lahore Region, Lahore.
W/DIRECTOR:-
Kindly refer to final report dated 30.04.2012, submitted by Mr.
Shafaqat Ali circle officer, ACE Sheikhupura.
Brief facts of the case of that one Syed Basharat Ali
submitted an application before circle officer, ACE Sheikhupura for
raid against Sohail Ahmad Virk Patwari Halqa Madhkay on
23.04.2012
.
After getting permission from learned District & Sesions
Judge Sheikhupura, who deputed Mr. Rana Sohail Learned Judicial
Magistrate to conduct the raid as per law.
Learned Magistrate after conducting the raid ordered to
register a criminal case against the said accused and then in
compliance with the order of learned Judicial Magistrate Circle
Officer registered FIR No. 15/2012 offence u/s 161 PPC read with
5/2/47 PCA at Police Station ACE Sheikhupura.
Perusal of the record reveals that complainant has no
personal work with the accused and has personal grudge with the
accused Sohail Ahmad Virk Patwari and Learned Magistrate in his
raid proceeding at page 3 admitted that he was 10 feet away
when the complainant handed over the money and he has not
hear the conversation between them. According to the statement
of the accused Sohail Ahmad Virk Patwari, complainant has
borrowed Rs. 2000/0 from him, he further stated that complainant
called me and asked for returning my money back and when I
came he put the money in my pocket and the raiding party arrest
me without listening any conversation.
Previous motive behind the false implication of accused
has also been established during the course of investigation as it
has transpired from the record that complainant intended to get
transferred/inherited the land measuring 6 Murabas inherited by
his deceased brother. On the plea that the female legal heirs left
by the deceased are not Muslim. But the Patwari inherited the
property in accordance with shia law in their favour. So
complainant being aggrieved by this act of Patwari registered a
case against him.
During the course of investigation complainant differed
from his previous statement and filed an affidavit where in he
admitted that he has revenge against the accused he registered a
case against Sohail Ahmad Virk Patwari and now he is not
interested to pursue the case, he further stated that he has no
objection to drop the said case.
Circle Officer/IO has submitted his final report and
stated that prosecution is wastage of time and he recommended
to drop the case.
I do hereby agree with the opinion of IO and and
recommend to drop the case and intiate the proceeding u/s 182
Cr.PCagainst the complainant Syed Basharat Ali who wasted the
precious time of the agency, if agreed please. Hence, dropping the
case as recommended may be approved and I.O may be directed
to submit cancellation report u/s 173 Cr PC in the Court of
competent jurisdiction at the earliest.
Submitted for approval and further necessary action, if
agreed please.
MALIK NAVEED TARIQ (ADP)Anti Corruption Establishment,
Lahore Region, Lahore.L/DDP:-
The file as well as opinion of AD(P) has been examined.
The defense plea taken by the accused was firstly recorded by the
raiding Magistrate and is established from record i.e. mutation NO.
540 dated 18.05.2011 is also corroborated by the resiling affidavit
of complainant.
In view of the recommendations of AD(P) at para No. 16
are endorsed.
ASIF ANJUM WARRAICH (DDP)Anti Corruption Establishment,
Lahore Region, Lahore.W/DIRECTOR:-
Kindly refer to para no. 37 to 43, 54 to 56 and revised
final report submitted by Mr. Shafaqat Ali Circle Officer ACE
Sheikhupura.
Brief facts of the case are that complainant,
Muhammad Ijaz s/o Muhammad Latif filed a petition u/s 22-A & 22-
B Cr. PC alleging that he purchased 8-Kanals land from Sarfraz
Ahmad, General Attorney on behalf of Ghazanfar Ali, but the sale
deed was got registered from the original owner Ghazanfar Ali vide
Documents No. 13275, Book No.1, Volume No. 2548, Dated:
08.09.2005 and Halqa Patwari Gulfam Akhtar, after taking bribe
money entered mutation No. 3564 dated: 17.08.2005 in his favour
and same was attested by RO. He further alleged that Halqa
Patwari, Gulfam Akhtar with connivance of Ghazanfar Ali Seller,
Arif Hussain and Sarfraz Ahmad, prepare a forged Fard of his land
and sell the same to Arif Hussain through General Power of
Attorney vide Document No. 170 Book No.1, Volume No. 2733,
Dated 10.01.2007 and he entered mutation No. 3814 Dated
17.02.2007 accordingly. Halqa Patwari while preparing record of
rights in year 2006-2007, malafidely entered the no of junior
mutation No. 3814 of Arif Hussain inspite of his senior mutation
No. 3564.
After enquiry, case FIR No. 10/2010 dated 20.05.2010,
offence u/s 420/468/471/109 PPC read with section 5/2/47 PCA was
registered against Gulfam Akhtar Patwari, Sarfraz Ahmad General
Power of Attorney Ghazanfar Ali original Seller at PS ACE
Sheikhupura, it was further approved that role of Mr. Riasat Ali
Girdawar and Malik Sarfraz Naib Tehsildar shall be determined
during the investigation.
After completion of investigation, the then DDI-III
recommended Judicial action against Gulfam Akhtar Patwari,
Ghazanfar Ali Original Seller, Arif Hussain Purchaser and
departmental action against Malik Sarfraz Naib Tehsildar, Riasat
Ali Girdawar. the file was examined by ADL and DDL who differed
with the opinion of I/O. On their recommendations J/A was
approved against Gulfam Akhtar Patwari, Ghazanfar Ali
(Vendor/Beneficiary), Sarfraz Ahmad GPA and departmental action
against Riasat Ali Girdawar and Malik Sarfraz Naib Tehsildar.
After approval of Judicial Action bail before arrest was
moved by one accused namely Gulfam Akhtar which was
dismissed by Special Judge Anti-Corruption and Lahore High Court
Lahore as well.
Subsequently accused Gulfam Akhtar moved an
application to worthy Director General ACE Punjab for
reinvestigation on 16.12.2011 and complainant Muhammad Ijaz
also moved an application to worthy Director General ACE Punjab
for reinvestigation to determine the role of Malik Sarfraz Naib
Tehsildar, Riasat Ali Girdawar. On the said applications worthy
Director General ACE Punjab ordered for reinvestigation of the
case and the investigation again marked to Circle Officer ACE
Sheikhupura, who recorded the statements u/s 161 Cr. PC of
Muhammad Nawaz present Patwari Mouza Mandiali, Malik Rafaqat
Ali Present Naib-Tehsildar, Gulfam Akhtar (accused), Sarfraz
Ahmad GPA (accused), Malik Sarfraz Naib Tehsildar (accused) and
the statement of the complainant Muhammad Ijaz as well.
Statements of the complainant and prosecution witnesses wherein
fully corroborated the allegations leveled in the complainant.
Now Circle Officer has further recommended judicial
action against Sarfraz Naib Tehsildar, Malik Riasat Ali Girdawar
against whom D/A was approved. In this way, now I.O
recommends judicial action against all the accused Gulfam Akhtar
Patwari, Malik Sarfraz Naib Tehsildar, Riasat Ali Girdawar,
Ghazanfar Ali (Vendor/Beneficiary), Arif Hussain Purchaser. Judicial
action as recommended may be approved and I.O may be directed
to submit report u/s 173 Cr PC in the Court at the earliest.
Submitted for approval and further necessary action, if
agreed please.
MALIK NAVEED TARIQ (ADP)Anti Corruption Establishment,
Lahore Region, Lahore.L/DDP:-
Brief facts of the case of that a case FIR No. 514/2009
u/s 496-A, 380 PPC PS Chunian District Kasur was registered
against Muhammad Shammoon etc. The investigation was with
Fateh Sher ASI. The present complainant who is a real brother of
one of the accused of the said case, alleges that Fateh Sher, ASI,
demanded and received Rs. 370000/- to declare his brother
innocent in the said case but did not do the needful rather. The
said case was cancelled after investigation conducted by
Superintendent of Police District Kasur.
After preliminary enquiry No. 217/2010-KSR, FIR No.
18/2011 PS Anti Corruption Establishment, Kasur was registered.
Firstly the investigation was conducted by Circle Officer Anti
Corruption Establishment Kasur, who recorded the statements of
the complainant and prosecution witnesses wherein they fully
corroborated the allegations leveled in the complainant.
Afterwards the investigation wsa entrusted to DDI ACE, Lahore.
During the pendency of investigation the accused got pre-arrest
bail. During the hearing of bail petition, the complainant appeared
before the court and stated that his compromise has been affected
with the accused. On his statement, bail was confirmed by the
court.
Now DDI has recommended to approve judicial action.
As the pre-arrest bail has been confirmed by court and the court
has also recorded the statement of complainant. Hence, judicial
action as recommended may be approved and I.O may be directed
to submit report u/s 173 Cr PC in the Court at the earliest.
Submitted for approval and further necessary action, if
agreed please.
MALIK NAVEED TARIQ (ADP)Anti Corruption Establishment,
Lahore Region, Lahore.L/DDP:-
BEFORE MR. ISRAR AHMED LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV) OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE.
SUBJECT: REPORT/COMMENTS IN COMPLAINT NO. 1027/2012, BY MALIK IFTIKHAR AHMAD S/O MALIK FEROZ ALI R/O 179/D, GUJAR COLONY, CHUNGI AMARSIDHU, LAHORE.
Respectfully Sheweth:-
Kindly refer to subject cited above detail report/comments
are given as under:-.
Brief facts are that one Malik Iftikhar Ahmad has leveled
allegation of corruption against Qasim Shah Secretary Union Council No.
139, Green Town, Lahore etc vide written complaint No. 3022/2011.
After receiving complaint No. 3022/11, preliminary enquiry was
conducted and the said complaint was converted into regular inquiry
vide Enquiry No. 483/2011 and the same was entrusted to Mr. Riaz
Ahmad Assistant Director (Investigation), Anti-Corruption Establishment,
Lahore.
That after probing the matter on full length and hearing
both the parties Assistant Director (Inv) has recommended
departmental Action against the delinquents.
In view of abovementioned submissions it is most
respectfully prayed that the redressal of the complainant has been
made accordingly. The complaint in hand may be filed.
Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL) Representative
Anti Corruption Establishment,Lahore Region, Lahore.
Subject: REPORT IN COMPLAINT OF ZUBAIDA KHANUM VERSUS DIRECTOR, ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMETN, LAHORE BRFORE ISRAR AHMAD KHAN CONSULTANT-IV OFFICE OF OMBUDSMAN LAHORE.
Kindly refer to subject cited above, it is humbly submitted
that above mentioned complaint was fixed for hearing today i.e.
15.05.2012, in which next date of hearing is 06.06.2012. That I have
attended the office of learned consultant and Honorable Consultant has
directed to conclude the matter before 06.06.2012. (Original Notice No.
2604 Dated 07.05.2012 is attached)
That re-investigation of case FIR No. 239/11, Police Station
Kot Radha Kishan District Kasur is pending before the Circle Officer
Head Quarter, Lahore. Kindly direct the said officer to conclude the
matter before 06.06.2012 and submit his report on 06.06.2012.
Submitted for further necessary action please.
MALIK NAVEED TARIQ (ADL-V)Anti Corruption Establishment,
Lahore Region, Lahore.
W/DDL
To,The Worthy Director,Anti-Corruption Establishment,Lahore Region, Lahore.
Subject: PROGRESS REPORT IN COMPLAINT NO. 1153/2012
Respected Sir,
It is respectfully submitted that I attended the court of Learned District and Sessions Judge, Lahore on 13-04-2012, in contempt petition / Application titled Shahid Siddique VS Director ACE, Lahore.
That detail report was submitted by Rana Tariq Mahmood Deputy Director Legal on 11.04.2012 as per direction of Learned District and Sessions Judge, Lahore.
That on 13-04-2012 Learned District and Sessions Judge, Lahore has passed an order and dismisses the said petition/Application. (Copy of orders is attached)
Submitted for necessary further action please.
Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL)Anti-Corruption Establishment,
Lahore Region Lahore.L/DDL
BEFORE MR. ISRAR AHMED LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV) OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE.
SUBJECT: REPORT/COMMENTS IN COMPLAINT NO. 848/2012, BY IQBAL HUSSAIN S/O MUSA R/O MODEL TOWN, LAHORE.
Respectfully Sheweth:-
Kindly refer to subject cited above detail report/comments
are given as under:-.
That the complainant has filed an application before your
good office and alleged that his properties situates at Kot Addu district
Muzaffar Garh, Jampur district Rajanpur, Kot Chutta District Dera Ghazi
Khan and concerned patwaris has prepared forged documents of above
mentioned properties. The complainant further alleged that he filed an
application before Anti-Corruption Department on 24th February 2012
but no material steps has been taken by the Anti-Corruption
Department.
It is pertinent to mention here that above allegations are
within the jurisdiction of Anti-Corruption Establishment, Dera Ghazi Khan
Region and complainant never filed any application before the office of
the respondent/Director Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region,
Lahore.
In view of abovementioned submissions it is most
respectfully prayed that the complaint in hand may be filed to the
extent of Director Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore
and report of the above complaint may be sought from Director Anti-
Corruption Establishment, Dera Ghazi Khan Region.
Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL) Representative
Anti Corruption Establishment,Lahore Region, Lahore.
IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT &
SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.
GHULAM MURTAZA
VS
DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE.
Respectfully Sheweth:-
Brief facts are that one Ghulam Murtaza has leveled
allegations against Tehsildar Halqa Niaz Beg and others vide
complaint No. 12/2012 in the office of the respondent.
That according to Anti-Corruption Establishment Rules, 1985,
preliminary inquiry was conducted by Ch. Maqbool Ahmad
Assistant Director (Inv). Who after examining the record submitted
his final report and recommended to drop the said complaint on
08.03.2012, because the civil litigation is pending between the
parties.
That on the recommendations of the Investigating officer
competent authority/respondent has dropped the said complaint
on 21.03.2012.
Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that
the petition in hand may kindly be dismissed.
Assistant Director (Legal)Anti Corruption Establishment,
Lahore Region, Lahore.
To,The Worthy Director,Anti-Corruption Establishment,Lahore Region, Lahore.
Subject: REPORT IN `PETITION U/S 22-A & 22-B, FILED BY MIAN SARFRAZ JAWA ADVOCATE
Respected Sir,It is respectfully submitted that I have attended and submitted the
report/comments in the court of Mr. Abdul Sattar Langah Sb Learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Lahore on 12-04-2012.
That Learned Additional District and Sessions Judge has directed as under:-
“In view of comments submitted by Assistant Director Legal, Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore, the respondents are directed to get record the verbatim statement of the petitioner and redress the grievance of the petitioner as per rules and law”(Attested copy of the orders is attached herewith)
Submitted for necessary further action please.
Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL)Anti-Corruption Establishment,
Lahore Region Lahore.L/DDL
IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.
NASIR MAQBOOL
VS
DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE.
Respectfully Sheweth:-
Brief facts of the case are that one Muhammad Tauqeer has
leveled allegation of corruption against Nasir Maqbool Qureshi etc.
That regular enquiry No. 98/2012 dated 09.02.2012 was
entrusted to Mr. Shah Rukh Khan Niazi Assistant Director Investigation.
That Investigating officer has recorded the version of both
the parties. The petitioner has joined the Inquiry and on last date of
hearing he requested for adjournment. That said enquiry is still pending
due to lack of interest of the petitioner.
That further action on the said enquiry may be taken as per
Anti-Corruption Establishment Rules, 1985.
Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the
petitioner may be directed to join the enquiry. So that the
matter be concluded as per law. In this circumstances petition
in hand may kindly be dismissed.
Assistant Director (Legal)Anti Corruption Establishment,
Lahore Region, Lahore.
IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF ABDUL SATTAR LANGAH LEARNED ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
LAHORE.
MIAN SARFRAZ AFTAB JAWA
VS
DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE.
Respectfully Sheweth:-
Brief facts of the case are that on the written complaint of
Mian Sarfraz Aftab Jawa Advocate, preliminary inquiry was conducted by
the competent authority.
That Mian Sarfraz Aftab Jawa Advocate has leveled
allegation of corruption against Serwar Si PS Mangamandi, Lahore. After
receiving complaint No. 997/12, preliminary enquiry was conducted by
Assistant Director Complaints, who vide its Letter No. ACE-LR-(C-
997)2012/5008 dated 22.03.2012, sought comments from CCPO,
Lahore. (Copy enclosed) The redressal of grievance of the petitioner is
under process and after receiving the report from CCPO, Lahore further
action will be taken as per Anti-Corruption Establishment Rules, 1985.
Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the
petition in hand may kindly be disposed of.
Assistant Director (Legal)Anti Corruption Establishment,
Lahore Region, Lahore.
IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.
MUHAMMAD YASIN
VS
DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE.
Respectfully Sheweth:-
Brief facts of the case are that one Muhammad Yasin has
leveled allegation of corruption against ASI Mushtaq Ahmad etc PS
Baghbanpura, Lahore. After receiving complaint No. 126/12, preliminary
enquiry was conducted by Assistant Director Complaints, who vide its
letter No. ACE-LR-(C-126)2012/1283-1284 dated 24.01.2012 seeking
comments from CCPO, Lahore.
That after receiving the comments from CCPO Lahore
competent authority has converted the complaint in to regular inquiry
vide Inquiry No. 212/2012 on 27.03.2012 and the same was entrusted to
Mr. Shah Rukh Khan Niazi Assistant Director (Investigation).
The grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and
further action may be taken as per law.
Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the
petition in hand may kindly be dismissed.
Assistant Director (Legal)Anti Corruption Establishment,
Lahore Region, Lahore.
To,The Worthy Director,Anti-Corruption Establishment,Lahore Region, Lahore.
Subject: REPORT IN FIR NO. 200/2009, OFFENCE U/S 420
Respected Sir,It is respectfully submitted that I have attended and submitted the
report/comments in the court of Learned District and Sessions Judge, Lahore today i.e. 29-03-2012, in contempt petition titled Shahid Siddique VS Director ACE, Lahore.
That Learned District and Sessions Judge has directed to record the version of the petitioner and decide the matter as per law before 11.04.2012.
That detail report will be submitted on 11.04.2012 as per direction of Learned District and Sessions Judge, Lahore. Kindly direct the concerned officer to decide the matter as early as possible. So that the report be submitted on 11.04.2012 in the court.
Submitted for necessary further action please.
Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL)Anti-Corruption Establishment,
Lahore Region Lahore.L/DDL
IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.
MALIK MUHAMMAD SHAHBAZ
VS
DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE.
Respectfully Sheweth:-
Brief facts are that one Muhammad Shahbaz son of
Muhammad Hanif has leveled allegations against Mian Absar DSP
Circle Masti Gate and others vide complaint No. 559/2012 in the
office of the respondent.
That according to Anti-Corruption Establishment Rules, 1985,
preliminary inquiry is being conduct by the office of respondent
and in this regard comments were sought from CCPO, Lahore vide
Letter No. ACE-LR-(C-559)-2012/3032 & 3033 Dated 23-02-2012.
That the preliminary enquiry is entrusted to Mr. Shah Rukh
Khan Niazi Assistant Director (Inv) on 21-03-2012. Who has called
both the parties to record their version on 04-04-2012.
In view of above mentioned submissions it is most
respectfully prayed that the applicant may be directed to attend
the office of the Enquiry Officer on 04-04-2012. Under the
circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the petition in hand
may kindly be dismissed.
Assistant Director (Legal)Anti Corruption Establishment,
Lahore Region, Lahore.
|To,The Worthy Director,Anti-Corruption Establishment,Lahore Region, Lahore.
Subject: PROGRESS REPORT IN COMPLAINT NO. 1153/2012
Respected Sir,It is respectfully submitted that I have attended and submitted the
report/comments in the court of Learned District and Sessions Judge, Lahore today i.e. 29-03-2012, in contempt petition titled Shahid Siddique VS Director ACE, Lahore.
That Learned District and Sessions Judge has directed to record the version of the petitioner and decide the matter as per law before 11.04.2012.
That detail report will be submitted on 11.04.2012 as per direction of Learned District and Sessions Judge, Lahore. Kindly direct the concerned officer to decide the matter as early as possible. So that the report be submitted on 11.04.2012 in the court.
Submitted for necessary further action please.
Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL)Anti-Corruption Establishment,
Lahore Region Lahore.L/DDL
DIRECTORATE OF ANTI-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT
LAHORE REGION LAHORE.
To,The Haji Rana Fawad AhmadCircle Officer, Anti-Corruption Establishment,Lahore Region, Lahore.
No. ACE-DDL-2012/ Dated:
Subject: COMPLAINT NO. 357-1-12 FILED BY HAJI LIAQAT ALI R/O DISTRICT LAHORE- IN THE OFFICE OF OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB
I am directed to inform you by the office of the Learned Ombudsman Punjab as under:-
That one Haji Liaqat Ali S/O Hussain Khan filed a complaint No. 357/1/12, against you before Ombudsman Punjab leveling some allegations of faulty investigation.(Copy of application is attached)
That the complainant states that matter in case FIR No. 1916/2011, offence under section 420,468,471 PPC read with section 5/2/47 of PCA, Police Station Kahna, Lahore was under your investigation and you have not completed your investigation on merit.
That in this regards Memo No. DAC-DD(Legal-19)2012/2699 Dated 10.02.2012 was also received from Deputy Director Legal, Anti-Corruption Establishment, Punjab Lahore, wherein he has directed for submission of report& parawise comments in the said case. (Copy of Letter is attached)
That the complaint was lastly fixed for hearing on 26.03.2012 and the same was adjourned for 25-04-2012 You are therefore required to appear before Mr. Israr Ahmad Learned Consultant-IV, office of the Ombudsman Punjab, Lahore along with written reply/parawise comments without any delay.
(MALIK NAVEED TARIQ)Assistant Director (Legal),
Anti-Corruption Establishment,Lahore Region Lahore.
Copy for information:-1. P.A. to Director Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore
Region, Lahore.2. P.A. to Director General Anti-Corruption
Establishment, Punjab, Lahore.
DIRECTORATE OF ANTI-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT
LAHORE REGION LAHORE
To,
The Assistant Director (D),Anti-Corruption Establishment,Pubjab, Lahore.
No. ACE-LR-(E-598/11/L)-2012/
Dated:
Subject: COMMUNICATION OF ORDERS OF OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB TO THE AGENCY ABOUT NON-COMPLIANCE OF DIRECTION
Kindly refer to your office Endst. No. DAC-CR-ML-65-12/3409 dated
21.02.2012, on the subject cited above.
In compliance with the orders of Worthy Director General conveyed to
the undersigned through endorsement under reference the requisite report has
been submitted in the office of the Ombudsman Punjab, Lahore will be
submitted on 28.03.2012. Copy of report is enclosed herewith for your kind
information.
DEPUTY DIRESTOR (LEGAL)ANTI-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT
LAHORE REGION LAHORE.
DIRECTORATE OF ANTI-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT
LAHORE REGION LAHORE
To,
The Assistant Director (D),Anti-Corruption Establishment,Pubjab, Lahore.
No. ACE-LR-(E-598/11/L)-2012/
Dated:
Subject: COMMUNICATION OF ORDERS OF OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB TO THE AGENCY ABOUT NON-COMPLIANCE OF DIRECTION
Kindly refer to your office Endst. No. DAC-CR-ML-65-12/3409 dated
21.02.2012, on the subject cited above.
In compliance with the orders of Worthy Director General conveyed to
the undersigned through endorsement under reference the requisite report has
been submitted in the office of the Ombudsman Punjab, Lahore on
28.03.2012. Copy of report submitted in the office of Ombudsman Punjab is
enclosed herewith for your kind information.
DEPUTY DIRESTOR (LEGAL)ANTI-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT
LAHORE REGION LAHORE
BEFORE MR. ISRAR AHMED LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV) OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE.
MUHAMMAD IRSHAD
VS
DIRECTORE GENERAL ANT-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT.
SUBJECT: REPORT/COMMENTS IN COMPLAINT NO. 706/2012
Respectfully Sheweth:-
Kindly refer to subject cited above detail report/comments
are given as under:-.
Brief facts of the complaint are that Enquiry NO. 197/2010,
against Muhammad Irshad EST Govt. Elementary School Maher Chand
Wala District Kasur was under probe in the office of Deputy Director,
ACE Kasur and Circle Officer Kasur was Enquiry Officer in the said
complaint.
That it is pertinent to mention here that the said Enquiry
Officer has recommended for dropping the said inquiry and the same is
still pending for final approval of the competent authority. It is further
submitted that allegations of harassment by the complainant are
baseless.
In view of abovementioned submissions it is most
respectfully prayed that the complaint in hand may be filed.
Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL)Representative
Anti Corruption Establishment,Lahore Region, Lahore.
BEFORE MR. ISRAR AHMED LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV) OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE.
BAGH ALI BHATTI
VS
DIRECTORE ACE, LAHORE REGION LAHORE
SUBJECT: REPORT/COMMENTS IN COMPLAINT NO. 1159/2011
Respectfully Sheweth:-
Kindly refer to subject cited above detail report/comments
had already been submitted in complaint No. 4776/2010, which was on
the same subject matter.
Brief facts of the case are that FIR NO. 02/2011 at Police
Station ACE Lahore was lodged on the complaint of Bagh Ali Bhatti. After
lodging the FIR the matter was investigated by the circle officer Head
Quarter, Lahore and the investigating officer after investigation declare
the accused persons innocent and discharged the accused persons.
That the investigating officer has submitted the discharge
report under section 173 CR.PC in the competent court vide Road
Certificate No. 55/21, dated 16.01.2012.
In view of abovementioned submissions it is most
respectfully prayed that the complaint in hand has become infectious
and the complainant may be directed to approach the concerned court
and the complaint in hand may be filed to the extent of Director Anti-
Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL)Representative
Anti Corruption Establishment,Lahore Region, Lahore.
BEFORE MR. ISRAR AHMED LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV) OFFICE OF THE
OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE.
BAGH ALI BHATTI
VS
DIRECTORE ACE, LAHORE REGION LAHORE
SUBJECT: REPORT/COMMENTS IN COMPLAINT NO. 4776/2010
Respectfully Sheweth:-
Kindly refer to subject cited above report/comments are
given as under.
Brief facts of the case are that FIR NO. 02/2011 at Police
Station ACE Lahore was lodged on the complaint of Bagh Ali Bhatti. After
lodging the FIR the matter was investigated by the circle officer Head
Quarter, Lahore and the investigating officer after investigation declare
the accused persons innocent and discharged the accused persons.
That the investigating officer has submitted the discharge
report under section 173 CR.PC in the competent court vide Road
Certificate No. 55/21, dated 16.01.2012.
In view of abovementioned submissions it is most
respectfully prayed that the complaint in hand has become infectious
and the complainant may be directed to approach the concerned court
and the complaint in hand may be filed to the extent of Director Anti-
Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL)Representative
Anti Corruption Establishment,Lahore Region, Lahore.
BEFORE MR. ISRAR AHMED LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV) OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE.
TANVEER MAHMOOD
VS
DIRECTORE ACE, LAHORE REGION LAHORE
SUBJECT: REPORT/COMMENTS IN COMPLAINT NO. 3419/2011
Respectfully Sheweth:-
Kindly refer to subject cited above report/comments are
given as under.
Brief facts of the case are that one Tanveer Mahmood has
filed a complaint No. 3419/2011. He submitted in his complaint that he
has submitted an application before respondent vide Enquiry No.
42/2011, but the respondent No. 1, is not interested to proceed further.
That after perusal of the record it reveals that the said
Enquiry is relating to somew one else and is not related to the
complainant Tanveer Mahmood.
In view of abovementioned submissions it is most
respectfully prayed that the complaint in hand may be filed to the
extent of Director Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL)Representative
Anti Corruption Establishment,Lahore Region, Lahore.
BEFORE MR. ISRAR AHMED LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV) OFFICE OF THE
OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE.
NAZAR ELAHI
VS
DIRECTORE ACE, LAHORE REGION LAHORE
SUBJECT: REPORT/COMMENTS IN COMPLAINT NO. 1988/6/11
Respectfully Sheweth:-
Kindly refer to subject cited above report/comments are
given as under.
Brief facts are that one Nazar Elahi has leveled allegation of
corruption against Akhtar Hussain Stenographer vide written complaint
No. 159/2011. After receiving complaint No. 159/11, preliminary enquiry
was conducted and the said complaint was converted into regular
inquiry vide Enquiry No. 31/2011 and the same was entrusted to Deputy
Director (Investigation), Anti-Corruption Establishment, Okara.
That after probing the matter on full length and hearing
both the parties Deputy Director (Inv), Anti-Corruption Establishment,
Okara has recommended for dropping the said enquiry and the
competent authority dropped the same on 27.02.2012, vide letter No.
ACE-LR-(E-31/11/OK)-2012/323
That allegations of corruption was not proved by the
complainant Nazar Elahi, against the respondent Akhtar Hussain
In view of abovementioned submissions it is most
respectfully prayed that the complaint in hand may be filed to the
extent of Director Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL)Representative
Anti Corruption Establishment,Lahore Region, Lahore.
BEFORE MR. ISRAR AHMED LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV) OFFICE OF THE
OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE.
RANA ANWAR HUSSAIN
VS
RANA IRSLAN KHAN
SUBJECT: REPORT/COMMENTS IN COMPLAINT NO. 4016/11
Respectfully Sheweth:-
Kindly refer to subject cited above report/comments are
given as under.
That complainant has leveled some personal allegations
against the then Circle Officer Rana Irslan Khan who is repatriated to his
parent department and the said complaint was filed after the
repatriation of the said delinquent official. That said delinquent is
now serving in Motorway Police, he can explain the allegations himself
and office of the Director Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region,
Lahore has no concern with the said delinquent official.
In view of abovementioned submissions it is most
respectfully prayed that the complaint in hand may be filed to the
extent of Director Anti-Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore.
Malik Naveed Tariq (ADL)Representative
Anti Corruption Establishment,Lahore Region, Lahore.
IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL
DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.
HIDAYAT BIBI
VS
DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE.
Respectfully Sheweth:-
Brief facts of the case are that one Mst. Hadayat Bibi has leveled
allegation of corruption against 1) Muhammad Jahngir 2) Muhammad
Saleem, Secretary Union Council Sultan Mahmood No. 38, Lahore
3) Administrator Union Council Sultan Mahmood No. 38, Lahore. After
receiving complaint No. 3887/11, preliminary enquiry was conducted
and prima facie allegations of corruptions were made out. That
competent authority/respondent has approved regular enquiry against
above mentioned accused persons and complaint No. 3887/11 was
converted into regular enquiry vide enquiry No. 45/2012 dated
21.01.2012 and the same was entrusted to Mr. Shah Rukh Khan Niazai
Assistant Director (Inv) on 21.01.2012. The investigating officer has
issued notice both the parties for 10.03.2012. The petitioner alongwith
her witnesses may join the investigation for recording her statement
and matter will be decided after hearing both the parties on merit.
Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the
contempt petition in hand may kindly be dismissed.
Assistant Director (Legal)Anti Corruption Establishment,
Lahore Region, Lahore.
IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.
ALLAH DITTA
VS
DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE.
Respectfully Sheweth:-
Brief facts of the case are that one Allah Ditta has filed a
petition under section 22-A & 22-B for compliance of order of this
Honorable Court Dated 04.10.2011. He further submitted that he has
submitted an application alongwith order of this Honorable Court vide
Diary No. 5264/2011, Dated 28.11.2011 but the respondent No. 1, is not
interested to proceed further.
After perusal of the record it reveals that an application
submitted by petitioner was already decided vide enquiry No. 237/2011.
The said enquiry was decided by Assistant Director (Investigation) and
the same was dropped vide letter NO.
ACE-LR-(E-237/2011/L)2011/11318 dated 03.11.2011.
Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the
petition in hand may kindly be dismissed.
Assistant Director (Legal)Anti Corruption Establishment,
Lahore Region, Lahore.
IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.
MUHAMMAD YASIN
VS
DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE.
Respectfully Sheweth:-
Brief facts of the case are that one Muhammad Yasin has
leveled allegation of corruption against ASI Mushtaq Ahmad etc PS
Baghbanpura, Lahore. After receiving complaint No. 126/12, preliminary
enquiry was conducted by Assistant Director Complaints, who vide its
letter No. ACE-LR-(C-126)2012/1283-1284 dated 24.01.2012 seeking
comments from CCPO, Lahore. The redressal of grievance of the
petitioner is under process and after receiving the report from CCPO,
Lahore further action may be taken as per law.
Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the
petition in hand may kindly be dismissed.
Assistant Director (Legal)Anti Corruption Establishment,
Lahore Region, Lahore.
IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.
MUHAMMAD ISHAQ
VS
DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE.
Respectfully Sheweth:-
Brief facts of the case are that one Muhammad Ishaq has
leveled allegation of corruption against SI Muhammad Younis PS Garhi
Shahu Lahore etc. After receiving complaint No. 3833/11, preliminary
enquiry was conducted by Assistant Director Complaints, who vide its
letter No. ACE-LR-(C-3833) 2011/13136 dated 24.12.2011 seeking
comments from CCPO, Lahore. The redressal of grievance of the
petitioner is under process and after receiving the report from CCPO,
Lahore further action may be taken as per law.
Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the
petition in hand may kindly be dismissed.
Assistant Director (Legal)Anti Corruption Establishment,
Lahore Region, Lahore.
Subject: REPORT IN COMPLAINT OF ZUBAIDA KHANUM VERSUS DIRECTOR, ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMETN, LAHORE BRFORE ISRAR AHMAD KHAN CONSULTANT-IV OFFICE OF OMBUDSMAN LAHORE.
Kindly refer to subject cited above, it is humbly submitted
that above mentioned complaint was fixed for hearing on 22.02.2012, in
which next date of hearing is 10.03.2012. That Honorable Consultant
has adjourned the said complaint for 10.03.2012 with the direction to
conclude the matter till next date of hearing.
Submitted for further necessary action please.
MALIK NAVEED TARIQ (ADL-V)Anti Corruption Establishment,
Lahore Region, Lahore.
W/DDL
IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.
KAMRAN AFZAL
VS
DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE.
Respectfully Sheweth:-
Brief facts of the case are that one Kamran Afzal has leveled
allegation of corruption against SI Asghar Ali PS Shahdra Town, Lahore.
After receiving complaint No. 4031/11, preliminary enquiry was
conducted by the Deputy Director (Inv-I), both the parties were
summoned for 03.01.12. Despite of calling again and again the
complainant Kamran Afzal could not appear before the Deputy Director
Investigation. The respondent Asghar Ali SI stated that the complainant
conducts the gambling at club and he as per law registered FIR No.
1259/11 and recovery was also affected from him. He further states that
the complainant is blackmailing just to avoid the further proceedings.
The allegation of corruption against Asghar Ali SI was not proved in the
said preliminary enquiry.
That allegation of corruption was not proved against the
respondent SI Asghar Ali competent authority dropped the complaint on
06.01.2012.
Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the
contempt petition in hand may kindly be dismissed.
Assistant Director (Legal)Anti Corruption Establishment,
Lahore Region, Lahore.
IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.
MUHAMMAD ARIF
VS
DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE.
Respectfully Sheweth:-
Brief facts of the case are that one Muhammad
Arif has leveled allegation of corruption against Asif Ali Patwari Halqa
Manga Mandi Lahore. After receiving complaint No. 2055/11, preliminary
enquiry was conducted by Deputy Director (Inv-III) Anti Corruption
Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore. Respondent Asif Ali Patwari
denied the allegations regarding receipt of illegal gratification of Rs.
5000/- for issuance of Fard. He stated that the land is still in the name of
Sardar Bibi (Mother of the complainant and inheritance mutation of the
mother of the complainant has not yet been sanctioned. He further
stated that he advised the complainant that inheritance mutation may
be sanctioned from competent authority before issuance of Fard and the
complainant get angry and he filed this application malafidely. Prima
facie allegations of taking illegal gratification could not be established,
even then competent authority has referred the matter in question to
the Assistant Commissioner for enquiry and necessary action as per law,
vide letter No. ACE-LR-(C-2055) 2011/10033 dated 05.10.2011. The
petitioner may approach to the Assistant Commissioner.
Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the
contempt petition in hand may kindly be dismissed.
Assistant Director (Legal)Anti Corruption Establishment,
Lahore Region, Lahore.
IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.
MUNAWAR KHAN
VS
DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE.
Respectfully Sheweth:-
Brief facts of the case are that one Munawar Khan has
leveled allegation of corruption against SI Muhammad Yasin PS Civil
Line, Lahore. After receiving complaint No. 3396/11, preliminary enquiry
was conducted and letter No. ACE-LR-(C-3396) 2011/11582 dated
15.11.2011 and Letter No. ACE-LR-(C-3396) 2011/11962 dated
24.11.2011 was sent to CCPO Lahore for enquiry report which was
received vide Diary No. 1659/MISC/CC/CCPO Dated 16.12.2011 in which
inquiry officer stated that ……………“business relation has been
existed between complainant and Mian Autos. During
Investigation complainant has withdraw his application and
denied any claim against SI Muhammad Yasin”……, and allegation
of corruption against Muhammad Yasin SI was not proved in the said
enquiry conducted by Superintendent of Police Investigation Civil Line
Division, Lahore.
That being non-disclosure of allegations and allegations of
corruption was not proved by the complainant Munawar Khan against
the respondent SI Muhammad Yasin competent authority dropped the
complaint on 06.01.2012.
Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the
contempt petition in hand may kindly be dismissed.
Assistant Director (Legal)Anti Corruption Establishment,
Lahore Region, Lahore
IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.
MIAN QAISAR AZIZ
VS
DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE.
Respectfully Sheweth:-
Brief facts of the case are that one Mian Qaisar Aziz has
leveled allegation of corruption against SI Waseem PS Lower Mall,
Lahore. After receiving complaint No. 3239/11, preliminary enquiry was
conducted and letter No. ACE-LR-(C-3239) 2011/13070 dated
24.12.2011 was sent to CCPO Lahore for enquiry which was received
vide Diary No. 178/MISC/CC/CCPO Dated 28.01.2011 and allegation
against Waseem SI proved in the said enquiry conducted by
Superintendent of Police Investigation Iqbal Town Division, Lahore. That
respondent approved regular enquiry against Waeem SI vide regular
enquiry No. 113/2012 dated 13.02.2012 and the same was entrusted to
Mr. Riaz Ahmad Ch. Assistant Director (Inv) on 21.02.2012. The
investigating officer has issued notice both the parties for 10.03.2012.
The petitioner may approach to the investigating officer for recording
his statement and matter will be decided after hearing both the parties
on merit.
Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the
contempt petition in hand may kindly be dismissed.
Assistant Director (Legal)Anti Corruption Establishment,
Lahore Region, Lahore.
BEFORE MUZAFFAR MEHMOOD GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB SECRETARY AUQAF & RELIGIOUS AFFAIRS DEPARTMETN
Subject: NOTE FOR PERSONAL HEARING IN THE PREPRESENTATION FILED BY DIRECTOR, ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMETN, LAHORE AGAINST THE OMBUDSMAN’S ORDER DATED 10.08.2011
Kindly refer to notice No. PS/Secy A&RA/1-9/2012 dated
16.01.2012 issued by your good self on the subject noted above.
Facts in brief are that case FIR No. 183/2004 was registered
against the complainant/accused namely Ch. Muhammad Naeem,
Electrical Supervisor, TMA Ravi Town, Lahore alongwith other co
accused persons at PS ACE, Lahore Region after approval of competent
authority and incomplete challan against him was submitted in the court
of Learned Senior Special Judge, Anti Corruption, Lahore on 02.03.2005.
On 13.04.2005 complainant/accused joined investigation after obtaining
interim bail and produced receipts Nos 1977 dated 24.02.2005 and
1978 dated 25.02.2005 amounting to Rs. 440000/= (3,00000+1,40000)
deposited by him in the Government Treasury showing the embezzled
amount due against him to the I.O with his free consent which were
taken into possession by the I.O in presence of witnesses through
recovery memo dated 13.04.2005 placed at page 317-C. On
19.04.2005 interim bail of complainant/accused was cancelled by
the Learned Senior Special Judge, Anti Corruption, Lahore as
withdrawn and his arrest was effected by the I.O through Zimni
No. 81 para NO. 1 dated 19.04.2005. The Learned Senior Special
Judge Anti Corruption Lahore vide order dated 20.04.2005 sent the
complainant/accused namely Muhammad Naeem Electrical
Supervisor, TMA Ravi Town, Lahore to judicial lockup and the case
is subjudic in the court of law.
I have examined the case on legal as well as factual
aspects and found that on prima facie proving the allegations case
FIR No. 183/2004 PS ACE, Lahore was registered against the
complainant/accused after approval of competent authority.
During investigation sufficient incriminating material to connect
the accused with the embezzlement was collected by the I.O and
the recovery of Rs. 440000/- was effected from him which was
produced by him through his free will specifically when he was on
interim bail at the time of recovery so there is no element of
coercion or maladministration on the part of I.O at the time of
recovery as alleged in the complaint.
Since the matter is subjudice in the court of competent
jurisdiction, the jurisdiction of Learned Ombudsman Punjab is
barred to entertain the complaint U/S 9 (1)(a) of “The Punjab
Office of the Ombudsman Act,1997” which is as under:-
“Jurisdiction, functions and powers of the
Ombudsman: - (i) The Ombudsman may on a
complaint by any aggrieved person, on a
reference by the Government or the Provincial
Assembly, or on a motion of the Supreme
Court or the High Court made during the
course of any proceedings before it or of his
own motion, undertake any investigation into
any allegation of maladministration on the
part of any Agency or any of its officers or
employees.
Provided that the Ombudsman shall not have
any jurisdiction to investigate or enquiry into
any matter which:-
(a) are subjudice before a court of competent
jurisdiction on
the date of the receipt of a complaint,
reference or motion by him”.
In view of above, it is a fit case for filing of
Representation to the Governor, Punjab Lahore U/S 32 of the
Punjab Office of the Ombudsman Act,1997. Matter may therefore,
be entrusted to the Learned DD(P), ACE, Lahore Region for futher
proceedings but after bringing the matter into knowledge of the
Worthy DG ACE, Punjab Lahore as a copy of impugned order dated
10.08.2011 has also been sent to him.
Last date of limitation for filing OF
Representation to the Governor, Punjab, Lahore
against order dated 10.08.2011 passed by the
Learned Ombudsman Punjab, Lahore is going to
09.09.2011.
Submitted for appropriate orders please.
MUNIR SHAHIDRepresentative
Anti Corruption Establishment,Lahore Region, Lahore.
IN THE HONORABLE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.
HAJI ABDUL REHMAN
VS
DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE.
Respectfully Sheweth:-
Brief facts of the case are that one Abdul Rehman has
leveled allegation of corruption against SI Ghulam Abbas PS Muslim
Town, Lahore. After receiving complaint No. 3151/11, preliminary
enquiry was conducted and letter No. 11205 dated 01.11.2011 was sent
to CCPO Lahore for enquiry which was received on 24.12.2011 and
allegation against Ghulam Abbas SI proved in the said enquiry
conducted by Superintendent of Police Investigation Iqbal Town, Lahore.
That respondent approved regular enquiry against Ghulam Abbas SI
vide regular enquiry No. 69/2012 dated 28.01.2012 and the same was
entrusted to Mr. Shah Rukh Khan Niazi Assistant Director (Inv) on
07.02.2012. The investigating officer has issued notice for 16.02.2012.
The petitioner may approach to the investigating officer for recording
his statement and matter will be decided after hearing both the parties
on merit.
Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the
petition in hand may kindly be dismissed.
Assistant Director (Legal)Anti Corruption Establishment,
Lahore Region, Lahore
ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENTLAHORE REGION LAHORE
To
The Deputy Director (Legal),Directorate of Anti Corruption Establishment,Punjab, Lahore.
No.ACE-LR-2012/ Dated:-
Subject: SUBMISSION OF REPORT REGARDING COMPLAINT NO. 738-OPK-11 & 1830-OPK-11 IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.
Respected Sir,
It is submitted that petition u/s 22-A & 22-B filed by
Mst. Horran Bibi W/o Nazar Khan is pending before Mr. Muhammad
Ijaz Butt Addition District & Sessions Judge Lahore in which next
date of hearing is fixed on 10.02.2012. Final report regarding
complaint No. 738-OPK-11 & 1830-OPK-11 is required by the
verbal order of the Court.
Kindly depute any officer to submit the same in the
court and oblige.
Submitted please.
MALIK NAVEED TARIQAssistant Director (Legal)
Anti Corruption EstablishmentLahore Region Lahore
IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.
SHAMS-UD-DIN
VS
DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION LAHORE ETC.
Respectfully Sheweth:-
BRIEF FACTS
Brief facts of the complaint are that complainant Shams-ud-
Din as alleged that Zulafiqar Patwari has received Rs. 30000/- from him
as illegal gratification to record the stay order proceedings in Revenue
Register and after getting the bribe he entered the stay order Vide Rapt
No. 4 dated 04.09.2005 in Roznamcha. On his complaint enquiry was
initiated against the said Patwari who appeared in person before
enquiry officer and has denied the allegations leveled on him. After
probing the matter final report was submitted by Rao Pervaiz Akhtar the
then Assistant Director (Inv) on 19.12.2011.
Legal branch after examining the final report and file on
05.01.2012 raised some legal objections and recommended that after
re-enquiring the matter revised final report be submitted. Competent
authority passed order on 11.01.2012 for compliance of objections
raised by legal branch and file entrusted to Mr. Riaz Ahmed Assistant
Director (Inv) on 13.01.2012, who is probing the matter and the same
will be finalized soon.
Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the
contempt application being based on false facts and information be
kindly be dismissed.
Assistant Director (Legal)Anti Corruption Establishment,
Lahore Region, Lahore
IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.
SHEIKH KHALID SAEED
VS
DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION LAHORE REGION LAHORE ETC.
REPORT IN PETITION UNDER SECTION 22-A & 22-B OF CR PC SUBMITTED BY MALIK NAVEED TARIQ ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (LEGAL) ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT LAHORE REGION LAHORE.
Respectfully Sheweth:-
That complainant submitted an application to Chief
Minister Punjab which was entrusted to respondent No. 1 by PSO
to Chief Minister Punjab. Wherein the applicant requested to probe
the matter and take legal action against the accused persons. The
complainant Sh. Khalid Saeed R/o 85-The Mall, Imtiaz Plaza vide
property No. 85/108-R19-S has alleged that M/S Imran Ashraf
Revenue Officer, Abdul Khaliq Qanongo, Irfan Ali Patwari Mouza
Mozang Lahore. He further stated that Record Keeper Data Gunj
Bakhsh Town, Lahore have made forged and bogus mutation and
changed the Khasra No. 2113 & 2114 of his property measuring 6
Marla 24 Sqft, in-connivance with his opponent party and revenue
functionaries in-connivance with the beneficiaries issued Fard for
sale of property in Khasra No. 2113 through Rapt Roznamcha 831
dated 11.08.2010 by fabricating Fard Badar No. 285 dated
29.07.2010.
On the written complaint the matter was probed by the
enquiry officer S.D. Khalid Deputy Director (Inv) Anti Corruption
Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore vide enquiry No. 167/2011
who after hearing both the parties submitted his final report on
16.07.2011. Enquiry officer has recommended that the matter
pertains to demarcation of property and parties have already
invoked the jurisdiction of Civil Court, no criminal misconducts on
the part of any public servant regarding preparation of Fard Badar
could be substantiated during enquiry and the matter was referred
to the Additional Collector, District Lahore for further necessary
action as to the allegations regarding demarcation of property etc.
In this regard letter No. ACE-LR-(E-167/11/L)-2011/8397 dated
10.09.2011 was sent to the Additional Collector, District Lahore
wherein it is referred that:-
“After due process, the Competent Authority
have approved that the matter may be referred
to your good office at your own end as to the
allegations regarding demarcation of property
etc. under intimation to this office”.
PRAYER:
Under the circumstances, petition being without any
lawful cause of action, is prayed to be disposed of.
Assistant Director (Legal)Anti Corruption Establishment,
Lahore Region, Lahore.
BEFORE MR.ISRAR AHMED THE LEARNED CONSULTANT (IV) OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB LAHORE.
REPORT IN COMPLAINT NO. 2016/11 SUBMITTED BY CH. MUHAMMAD NAEEM.
Respectfully Sheweth:-
Kindly refer to notice No. 2016-11 dated 14.11.2011on the
subject noted above.
It is submitted that case FIR No. 183/04 was registered
against the complainant/accused namely Ch. Muhammad Naeem,
Electrical Supervisor, TMA Ravi town, Lahore alongwith other co-accused
persons at PS ACE, Lahore Region after approval of competent authority
and incomplete challan against him was submitted in the court of
Learned Senior Special Judge, Anti Corruption, Lahore on 02.03.2005.
On 13.04.2005 complainant/accused joined investigation after obtaining
interim bail and produced receipts Nos. 1977 dated 24.02.2005 and
1978 dated 25.02.2005 amounting to Rs. 440000/-(300000+140000)
deposited by him in the Government Treasury showing the embezzled
amount due against him to the I.O with his free consent which were
taken into possession by the I.O in presence of witnesses through
recovery memo dated 13.04.2005. On 19.04.2005 interim bail of
complainant/accused was cancelled by the Learned Senior Special
Judge, Anti Corruption, Lahore as withdrawn and his arrest was effected
by the I.O through Zimni No. 81 para No. 01 dated 19.04.2005. The
Learned Senior Special Judge Anti Corruption, Lahore vide order dated
20.04.2005 sent the complainant/accused namely Muhammad Naeem
Electrical Supervisor, TMA Ravi, Lahore to judicial lockup and the case is
subjudice in the court of law.
The order dated 10.08.2011 passed by your good self as to
the exclusion of the name of complainant namely Ch. Muhammad
Naeem from the subject enquiry has been challenged thorough
representation/appeal before the Honorable Governor Province of
Punjab, Lahore which is pending for adjudication.
MUNIR SHAHIDRepresentative
Anti Corruption Establishment,Lahore Region, Lahore.
IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.
SHAMS-UD-DIN
VS
DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION LAHORE ETC.
PARAWISE REPLY ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT NO. 01
Respectfully Sheweth:-
1. That the contents of para No. 01 are admitted to extent that
the petition was filed by the petitioner and the Honorable
Court was pleased to pass an order dated 20.09.2011.
2. That the contents of para No. 2 are correct to extent that in
compliance of court order dated 20.09.2011, Enquiry
bearing No. 555/2011 initiated in the Anti Corruption
Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore and on 06.10.2011
the petitioner and defendant No. 02 put their attendance on
the order sheet.
3. That the contents of para 03 are totally false and frivolous
as it is mentioned in para No. 02 that enquiry bearing No.
555/2011 has already been initiated against respondent No.
02 who has dully made his appearance on 06.10.2011. Copy
of order sheet is annexed for kind perusal of this Honorable
Court which is reflective of the fact that the respondent No.
02 has marked his attendance.
4. That the contents of para No. 04 are vehemently denied
being false.
5. That the role of respondent No. 02 whether he has
committed forgery by entering wrong mutation or not shall
be determined during the course of enquiry.
6. That the contents of para No. 06 are fabricated as
respondent No. 02 appeared in the enquiry firstly on
06.10.2011, 26.10.2011, 19.11.2011, 21.11.2011 and lastly
on 28.11.2011.
7. Legal.
Under the circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that the
contempt application being based on false facts and information be
kindly be dismissed.
Deputy Director (Inv-III)On behalf of respondent (No. 01)Anti Corruption Establishment,
Lahore Region, Lahore
BEFORE MR. ISRAR AHMAD THE LEARNED CONSULTANT OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN PUNJAB, LAHORE .
REPORT IN COMPLAINT NO. 2988/2011 SUBMITTED BY MALIK MUHAMMAD SAQIB ANJUM .
Respectfully Sheweth
I have honor to refer to your notice No. 2988/2011 dated
29.10.2011 on the subject noted above.
The above titled complaint does not pertain to Anti
Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region rather the same relates to
District Narowal which falls within jurisdiction of Anti Corruption
Establishment, Gujranwala Region, Gujranwala.
It is therefore, requested that further correspondence in the
matter may be made with the concerned office.
Deputy Director (Legal)Anti Corruption Establishment,
Lahore Region, Lahore.
No.ACE-LR-2011/ Dated:-
A Copy is forwarded to the Director (Legal), Anti Corruption
Establishment, Punjab, Lahore for information with reference to his
memo No. DG-ACE-DIR-L-(79)-2011/17865 dated 12.11.2011.
Deputy Director (Legal)Anti Corruption Establishment,
Lahore Region, Lahore
IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDGE ANIT CORRUPTION LAHORE .
In Re: - Anwaar Hussain Vs The State
CASE FIR NO. 55/2008 PS, DACE, LAHORE.
Subject: APPLICATION FOR GRANTING TIME FOR SUBMISSION OF CHALLAN U/S 173 CR PC.
Respectfully Sheweth:-
1. That the above titled petition is pending adjudication before
this Honorable Court and is fixed for submission of report u/s
173 Cr PC for today.
2. That the investigation of case FIR No.55/2008 has been
entrusted to investigating team comprising of undersigned
Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore by the
competent authority vide order dated 19.10.2011.
3. That the case is complicated and in order to conclude the
investigation evidence is required to be collected as
allegedly huge loss to Government exchequer is involved.
4. That interest of justice demand that the investigation be
based on proper evidence and for this purpose appropriate
time is required.
In view of above circumstances, it is very humbly prayed that
further appropriate time may be granted for finalization of investigation
and submission of report u/s 173 Cr PC in the best interest of justice.
Deputy Director (Inv-I),Anti Corruption Establishment,
Lahore Region, Lahore
Deputy Director (Legal),Anti Corruption Establishment,
Lahore Region, Lahore
IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.
In Re: - Muhammad Shahbaz Vs The Additional Director Anti Corruption Lahore Petition u/s 22A, 22B Cr PC
Report on behalf of respondent
Respectfully Sheweth:-
The facts in brief are that the petitioner submitted a
complaint against Amanat Ullah ASI PS Shahdara Lahore under the
allegation voiced in the petition. On the receipt of the complaint the
matter has been referred to the CCPO for obtaining his comments and
report alongwith the counter version of the ASI. On the receipt of the
comments/report and counter version of the ASI, further proceedings
will be conducted in accordance with law and rules. The petitioner is
premature and is liable to be dismissed.
RepresentativeZulafqar Ali (ASI)
Anti Corruption Establishment,Lahore Region, Lahore
IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDGE ANIT CORRUPTION LAHORE .
In Re: - Anwaar Hussain Vs The State
CASE FIR NO. 55/2008 PS, DACE, LAHORE.
Subject: APPLICATION FOR GRANTING TIME FOR SUBMISSION OF CHALLAN U/S 173 CR PC.
Respectfully Sheweth:-
5. That the above titled petition is pending adjudication before
this Honorable Court and is fixed for submission of report u/s
173 Cr PC for today.
6. That the investigation of case FIR No.55/2008 has been
entrusted to investigating team comprising of undersigned
Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore by the
competent authority vide order dated 19.10.2011.
7. That the case is complicated and in order to conclude the
investigation evidence is required to be collected as
allegedly huge loss to Government exchequer is involved.
8. That interest of justice demand that the investigation be
based on proper evidence and for this purpose appropriate
time is required.
In view of above circumstances, it is very humbly prayed that
further appropriate time may be granted for finalization of investigation
and submission of report u/s 173 Cr PC in the best interest of justice.
Deputy Director (Legal), Deputy Director (Inv-I),Anti Corruption Establishment, Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore Lahore Region, Lahore
IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.
In Re:- Muhammad Alyas Vs Deputy Director Anti Corruption Lahore Petition u/s 22A, 22B Cr PC
Report on behalf of respondent
Respectfully Sheweth:-
The contention of the petitioner contained in para 2 of the
petition is not correct because the application/complaint annexed with
the petition has never been received in ACE.
It is therefore, requested that the petitioner may be directed
to attend the ACE alongwith the complaint supported by an affidavit for
further action by the ACE in accordance with ACE Rules 1985.
RepresentativeZulafqar Ali (ASI)
Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region, Lahore
IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.
Maqsood Ahmed
VS
DIRECTOR GENERAL ANTI CORRUPTION LAHORE ETC .
Respectfully Sheweth:-
Brief facts of the complaint filed by Maqsood Ahmed against
Muhammad Yousaf Khokhar etc are that the father of the complainant
Muhammad Jahangir was owner of property No. NE-XVI-153-S-15/1/RH,
who has died and now the property is in possession of his legal heirs.
Malik Muhammad Ijaz by giving heavy bribe to excise inspector
Muhammad Yousaf Khokhar got prepared a forged PT-1 S-No.5307/1
dated: 01-01-2006 in his name. The complainant requested that the
same may be cancelled.
On receipt of this complaint the same was marked as complaint
No.1744/2011 in the Anti Corruption Establishment, Lahore Region,
Lahore. After due process and probe the competent authority vide his
order that dated: 02-06-2011 directed to refer the same to the
department and incompliance of that order the instant complaint was
referred to Director General Excise and Taxation vide this office
Memo,No.ACE-LR(C-1744)/2011-4768 dated 10-06-2011 for disposal at
their end.
The complaint has been referred to Excise Department on
02.06.2011 where as the order of this Honourable court was passed on
03-06-2011. In view of the above mentioned circumstances now the
complaint is lying with Director General Excise and Taxation for its
adjudication.
It is humbly prayed that petition in hand may kindly be dismissed.
RepresentativeZulafqar Ali (ASI)
Anti Corruption Establishment,Lahore Region, Lahore.
IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.
ABDUL AZIZ
VS
DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION LAHORE.
Respectfully Sheweth:-
With profound respect it is humbly submitted that due to the
non receipt of the copy of petition u/s 22A, 22B Cr PC, the
report/comments have not been submitted in this Honorable Court.
It is therefore, requested that the copy of the petition may
kindly be ordered to be supplied so that the comments/report could be
submitted.
RepresentativeZulafqar Ali (ASI)
Anti Corruption Establishment,Lahore Region, Lahore.
IN THE COURT OF MUHAMMAD IJAZ BUTT ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE LAHORE.
MUHAMMMAD MAJEED
VS
DIRECTOR ANTI CORRUPTION LAHORE.
Respectfully Sheweth:-
With profound respect it is humbly submitted that due to the
non receipt of the copy of petition u/s 22A, 22B Cr PC, the
report/comments have not been submitted in this Honorable Court.
It is therefore, requested that the copy of the petition may
kindly be ordered to be supplied so that the comments/report could be
submitted.
RepresentativeZulafqar Ali (ASI)
Anti Corruption Establishment,Lahore Region, Lahore.
To
The Worthy DirectorAnti Corruption Establishment,Lahore Region, Lahore.
Subject: C ASUAL LEAVE
Respected Sir,
With due respect and profound regards it is submitted
that I have to go to Layyah to look after my father. So, I can not
attend the office on 09.04.2012 to 10.04.2012. Kindly grant me
two days casual leave with permission to leave the station.
I shall be highly thankful to you.
MALIK NAVEED TARIQ Assistant Director (Legal)
Anti Corruption Establishment,Lahore Region, Lahore
L/DDL:-