Natural Connections: New Strategies for Measuring Connectedness with Nature Wesley Schultz...
-
Upload
susan-grinder -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Natural Connections: New Strategies for Measuring Connectedness with Nature Wesley Schultz...
Natural Connections: New Strategies for Measuring Connectedness with Nature
Wesley SchultzCalifornia State University
Presentation prepared for Society of Human Ecology, Bar Harbor, Maine. Address correspondences to: Wesley Schultz, Department of Psychology, California State University, San Marcos, CA, 92078. [email protected]. (760) 750-8045.
October 19, 2006
Carol SaundersBrookfield Zoo
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Natural Connections: New Strategies for Measuring Connectedness with Nature
Wesley SchultzCalifornia State University
Presentation prepared for Society of Human Ecology, Bar Harbor, Maine. Address correspondences to: Wesley Schultz, Department of Psychology, California State University, San Marcos, CA, 92078. [email protected]. (760) 750-8045.
October 19, 2006
Carol SaundersBrookfield Zoo
Acknowledgements Coral Bruni, Karelle Jones, Randie Chance,
Jeremy Bowlin, Wes Mouw Publications related to this line of inquiry:
Schultz, P. W., Tabanico, J., & Tilos, R., & Adams, C. (in press). Self, identity, and the natural environment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.
Oskamp, S., & Schultz, P. W. (2005). Attitudes and opinions (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Schultz, P. W., Shriver, C., Tabanico, J., & Khazian, A. (2004). Implicit connections with nature.
Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24,31-42. Schultz, P. W. (2002). Inclusion with nature: Understanding the psychology of human-nature
interactions. In P. Schmuck, & P. W. Schultz, The psychology of sustainable development. New York: Kluwer.
Schultz, P. W. (2000). Empathizing with nature: The effects of perspective-taking on concern for environmental issues. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 391-406.
Environmental Attitudes Environmental attitudes--the evaluative beliefs
(affect) and behavioral intentions a person holds regarding environmentally related activities or issues. “I favor opening the Alaskan Arctic Wildlife Refuge
for oil exploration” Environmental concern--affect or worry associated
with environmental problems. One component of environmental attitudes “How much does each of the following environmental
problems worry you…” E.g., Water pollution, global warming, depletion of natural
resources, biodiversity, habitat destruction
Environmental Attitudes Environmental values--the reasons why a person is
concerned about environmental problems. Egoistic--focus on self Social-altruistic--focus on other people Biospheric--focus on plants and animals
Biospheric concerns are positively correlated with environmental behavior
Egoistic concerns negatively correlated with environmental behavior
What leads a person to value nature versus valuing self?
So Why do People Value Nature? Environmental literature is replete with
references to “inclusion” Humans are a part of nature, versus,
humans are separate from nature. I am a part of nature, or I am separate
from nature This belief is “primitive” and generally
“implicit”
The Inclusion Model
BiosphericMotives
EgoisticMotive
Behavior
+
+
Separate from nature
Connectedto nature
Rational Choice
Psychological Inclusion
A Psychological Model of Inclusion
Inclusion--An individual’s beliefs about the extent to which s/he is part of the natural environment.
Cognitive--connectedness between self and nature
Affective--the extent to which an individual cares about plants and animals
Behavioral--an individual’s commitment to act in ways that benefit the natural environment.
Measuring Connectedness
Inclusion of Nature in Self (Schultz, 2001) Connectedness to Nature Scale (Mayer &
Frantz, 2004) Environmental identity (Clayton & Opotow,
2003) New Ecological Paradigm (Dunlap et al.,
2000) Others being developed
Implicit Connections with Nature
Implicit Association Test (IAT) Greenwald et al. (1998, 2003) Categorization task Response latencies Compatible and incompatible trials Details previously published (Schultz et
al., 2004, 2005, in press; Bruni et al., 2006)
Balanced Identity Designs (Greenwald et al., 2003)
Self
Evaluation Attribute or Group
Self-
este
em
Self-concept
Attitude
Balanced Identity Designs (Greenwald et al., 2003)
Self
Evaluation Attribute or Group
Self-
este
em
Self-concept
Attitude
Self-Nature Associations
FlexiTwins Game On-line or stand-alone game, incorporating IAT principles Provides scores of Implicit Connections with Nature Possible use with
children Incorporated into a
longitudinal study
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
FlexiTwins Game Game used and validated with adult samples (Schultz & Bruni, forthcoming) Good reliability and test-retest Evidence for validity Current project designed to examine usefulness with children Pilot testing for forthcoming longitudinal study
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
FlexiTwins Game Participants: 30 grade school children, ages 10-12 (5th grade) Materials: several self-report measures of environmental attitudes, flexitwins game,
in-person interview, peer-ratings, teacher ratings, daily dairy, picture of favorite place Procedure: tested individually in classroom. On-line survey, in-person interview, play
game (twice)
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
FlexiTwins Game
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
NATURE BUILT ME NOT ME
Waterfall Church (name) (random)
Flower Chair (picture) (random)
Tree Car
Mountain Truck
Note: Stimuli derived from a card sorting task with kids at the Brookfield Zoo. Selected items were those that were most consistently classified by 10-year-olds as “natural” or “built.”
Results
FlexiTwins test-retest = .62
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Flexi Twins D total Score Time 2
1.381.25
1.131.00
.88.75
.63.50
.38.25
.130.00
8
6
4
2
0
Std. Dev = .37 Mean = .64N = 30.00
Results Children very high on connectedness (mean=.64) For comparison:
California college students (.38 to .44 across six studies) Sample of visitors from San Diego Zoo (.45) Environmental activists (.62)
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Results Correlates with implicit connectedness
Explicit concerns (not significant) Expected pattern, but not significant
Gender: boys less connected than girls Caring for plants or animals (not significant) Number of hours watching TV (r=-.41) Number of hours playing video games (r=-.45)
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Results
Correlates with implicit connectedness Time spent playing inside (r=-.36) Time spent playing outside (not significant) “Is there a person in your life who encourages you to spend time in nature.” Yes (.70), no
(.49)
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Discussion Current data used as pilot test for forthcoming longitudinal study “accelerated longitudinal design” Measuring kids at age 10, 12, 14, 16, 18 Yearly measures for four years What to include?
Open for comment and discussion What factors lead to connectedness? What consequences does connectedness have on later-life decisions?
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.