NATO Defence Planning Process
-
Upload
sebastian-huluban -
Category
Documents
-
view
571 -
download
44
description
Transcript of NATO Defence Planning Process
NATO Defence Planning Process
(NDPP)
LTC David Cathro
ACT Staff Element Europe, Mons+32-(0)65-44-8076, IVSN 254-8076 [email protected]
Supreme
Allied
Commander
Transformation
NATO UNCLASSIFIED1
Aims
• NATO Defence Planning Process
• Key products
• Governance
• Key references
• Where we are now and what next
NATO UNCLASSIFIED2
“… to provide a framework within which national and
Alliance defence planning activities can be harmonized to
meet agreed targets in the most effective way. It should
facilitate the timely identification, development and delivery
of the necessary range of forces that are interoperable
and adequately prepared, equipped, trained and supported
as well as the associated military and non-military
capabilities to undertake the Alliance’s full spectrum of
missions.’’
- Outline Model for a NATO Defence Planning Process -
PO(2009)0042
Aim of NDPP
NATO UNCLASSIFIED3
Defence Planning Staff Team
DPPC(R)
NDPP Governance
NAC
Planning
Domains
IMS
IS
ACONCIA
CDEB
ACTCoEs
NATO UNCLASSIFIED4
NDPP 101
What do we (NATO) want to do?
What do we need to do it?
What do we need to maintain,
what are the shortfalls (& surpluses)?
What do we have available?
What do we want nations to provide?
NATO UNCLASSIFIED6
NDPP
1. Political
Guidance
2. Determine
Requirements
3. Apportion
Requirements
Set Targets
4. Facilitate
Implementation
5. Review
Results Improving
Alliance
Capabilities
ACT
Lead
Step
2+
NATO UNCLASSIFIED7
Ste
p 4
:
Faci
lita
te I
mp
lem
en
tati
on
(O
n-g
oin
g)
Step 1:
Establish Political Guidance
‘Level of Ambition’
National & Multinational Responses to
Capability Survey
Existing Collective (Common Funded) Capabilities
National Targets
Multi-National Targets
Collective Targets (Common Funded)
Step 5:
Review Results
‘NATO Capability Review’
Step 2:
Determine Requirements
‘Capability Requirements Review
(CRR)’
Step 3:
Apportion Requirements
and Set Targets
NDPP
Minimum
Capability
Requirements
(MCR).....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
COA Prioritise(PSA)
Capabilities
to be
Maintained.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
Shortfalls.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
• Complete Set of Capabilities
• Quantitative and Qualitative
• Transparent and Traceable
• Analytically Derived
• Single Set of Requirements
• All Planning Domains
• Numerous workshops and seminars with
Nations’ Reps
Requirements Analysis
(Step 2)
NATO UNCLASSIFIED9
CM
CP
ESE
HO&DR
CD
CT
PE
EOP
PK
MT Sub-Set
All 15 NATO
Mission Types
NATO Level of Ambition (LoA)
MJO
LoSJO Lo
SJO-
Lo
SJO Air
SJO
Mar
MJO HiSJO HiSJO-
Hi
MJO
LoSJO Lo
SJO-
Lo
SJO Air
SJO
Mar
MJO HiSJO HiSJO-
Hi
Requirements AnalysisG
en
eri
c P
lan
nin
g
Sit
ua
tio
ns
GPS PK
NATO UNCLASSIFIED11
Initial Step 3 Components(Step 2+)
Minimum
Capability
Requirements
(MCR)
Minimum
Capability
Requirements
(MCR)
Minimum
Capability
Requirements
(MCR)
Bi-SC Priority
Shortfall
Areas
Bi-SC Priority
Shortfall
Areas
Bi-SC Priority
Shortfall
AreasCourse of Action
Development
NATO UNCLASSIFIED12
NATION A : MOD / CHOD AND
OTHER MIN REPS
IMS
ACT
(Chair)
Joint Consultations in national capitals
IS
Initial Step 3 Components (2+)
NATO UNCLASSIFIED13
Current Cycle
Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Step 1 Political Guidance
Step 2 – Determine Requirements
Step 4 Facilitate Implementation
PG
MCR
Step 3 Draft Targets& Apportionment
Agreed Targets
BB
JCMC
Synopsis & PSA
COA
NATO UNCLASSIFIED15
Joint Consultations Schedule
NATION DATE REMARKNetherlands 16-17 Oct The HagueNorway 18-19 Oct OsloCroatia 23-24 Oct ZagrebSlovenia 25-26 Oct LjubljanaRomania 30-31 Oct BukarestAlabania 01-02 Nov TiranaCanada 06-07 NovUnited States America 08-09 NovPortugal 13-14 Nov LisbonSpain 15-16 Nov MadridTurkey 20-21 Nov AnkaraGreece 22-23 Nov AthensCzech Rep 27-28 Nov PragueSlovakia 29-30 Nov BratislavaEstonia 04-05 Dec TalinnPoland 06-07 Dec WarshawDenmark 11-12 Dec CopenhagenHungary 13-14 Dec BudapestBulgaria 22-23 Jan SofiaGermany 24-25 Jan BonnFrance 28-29 Jan ParisBelgium 30-31 Jan BrusselsLuxembourg 01 FebUnited Kingdom 05-06 FebLatvia 07-08 Feb RigaItaly 12-13 Feb RomeLithuania 14-15 Feb VilniusIceland 07 Jan
BG Hansen-Nord BG Laurent
NATO UNCLASSIFIED16
NDPP 101
What do we (NATO) want to do?
What do we need to do it?
What do we need to maintain,
what are the shortfalls (& surpluses)?
What do we have available?
What do we want nations to provide?
Step 1 - Political Guidance (LOA)
Step 2 - PSAs
Step 5 - NATO Inventory (DPCS)Step 2 - MCR
Step 3 – GTP & Tailored Targets
NATO UNCLASSIFIED17
So what for me?
• October 2012 – January 2013: Joint
Consultations.
• September 2012- December 2012: Frame
the DPCS.
• 1 December 2012: T-day = transformation
to the new NATO Command Structure
(NCS) and the Peacetime Establishment.
• April 2013: Multi-laterals.
• Q3 2013: DPCS analysis
• 2013: Preparation for the next cycleNATO UNCLASSIFIED
18
2012Step 3 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
2012Step 2
2015 2016
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
MCR
Comparison
PSA
Apportionment
&
Target Setting
Step 5 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Capability Review
SRA
2012
ACT Plan for CRR16
Synopsis
Approved
Target
Packages
CoA
Multi-lateral
Examinations
Apport.
Approved
Target
Packages
Summary
Blue
Books
Resp.
Analysis
Bi-lats
Bi-SC
Capability
Report
Resp.
Analysis
Bi-lats
MCR
GTP
Capability
Report
Multi-
lats
PARP 2013 2014 2015 2016 20172012
Bi-lats
PARP MG Issued
Consolidated
Report Approved
Drafting
PGs
Draft PG
Bi-lats
Su
rve
ys
Re
spo
nse
s Summary
Report
Bi-lats
PARP MG Issued
Consolidated
Report Approved
Drafting
PGs
Draft PG
Bi-lats
Su
rve
ys
Re
spo
nse
s
Summary
Report
Bi-lats
PARP MG Issued
Consolidated
Report Approved
Drafting
PGs
Dra
ft P
Gs
Issu
ed
Su
rve
ys
Re
spo
nse
s
BBs
Update
CC&S
CC&S
Step 1 2013 2014 20172012
Political Guidance
JCs
Joint
Consultations
MCR Preparation
Survey Survey
MCR Development & Staffing
MCR Preparation
Indicates activity to ensure SMEs are identified and trained
Indicates main period of activity
AnalysisAnalysis
Bi-SC
As of 21 Sep 12
Prepared by Project Management team
Approved by BG Laurent CG&S
Dra
ft P
Gs
Issu
ed
Analysis
Dra
ft P
Gs
Issu
ed
The outcome of Feb Ministerials on “Enhancing the
NDPP” could affect when PG is delivered (Q3/Q4 2013)
19
What Next
• Step 2 Lessons Identified Report
• Step 3 Lessons Identified Process
• Enhancing NDPP
– Oct 2012: Improving Visibility & Relevance
– Feb 2013: Streamlining the NDPP
• Incorporating Smart Defence and the
Connected Forces Initiative
• CRR 16 Project Initiation Document
NATO UNCLASSIFIED20
Useful References
• PO(2009)0042 ‘Outline Model for a NATO Defence Planning Process’, 02
Apr 2009.
• C-M(2011)0022, dated 14 March 2011Political Guidance,
• NDPP Step 2+ Project Initiation Document (being rewritten for CRR16)
• 5000 TSC FRX 0030/TT-7673/Ser:NU0053 dated 14 October 2011. Bi-SC
Agreed Capability Codes and Capability Statements
• 5000 TSC FRX 0010/TT-6520/Ser: NC0036 dated 06 June 2011. NATO
Defence Planning Capability Review 2010/2011 - Bi-SC Suitability and Risk
Assessment.
• 5000 TSC FRX 0030/TT-7804/Ser:NC 0006 dated 20 December 2011.
NATO’s Minimum Capability Requirements 2011.
• 500 TSC FRX 0030/TT-8030/Ser:NC 002 dated 21 March 2012. Synopsis
of the 2011 Minimum Capability requirements, including a Summary of the
2012 Priority Shortfall Areas.
• AC/281-N(2012)0131-REV6 (R) dated 05 October 2012. Improving the
Visibility and Relevance of Outputs from the NDPP.
• Step 2 Lessons Identified Summary Report (not yet released)
NATO UNCLASSIFIED21
Aims
• NATO Defence Planning Process
• Key products
• Governance
• Key references
• Where we are now and what next
NATO UNCLASSIFIED22