National Transit Database - NTD Transit Database 1 ... National Transit Database - NTD . ... Change...

25
Federal Transit Administration National Transit Database 1 Established by Congress in 1974 Primary national database for public transit Collects annual transit performance and financial data, monthly ridership, and safety and security data Summarizes data in various annual reports National Transit Database - NTD

Transcript of National Transit Database - NTD Transit Database 1 ... National Transit Database - NTD . ... Change...

Federal Transit Administration National Transit Database 1

Established by Congress in 1974

Primary national database for public transit

Collects annual transit performance and financial data, monthly ridership, and safety and security data

Summarizes data in various annual reports

National Transit Database - NTD

Federal Transit Administration

National Transit Database - NTD

Used to calculate Federal funding formulas

Supports

◦ Peer-group benchmarking

◦ Analysis of investment needs

◦ Research

Urban and rural transit grantees of Federal

funding are required to report

Federal Transit Administration National Transit Database 3

www.ntdprogram.com

Federal Transit Administration National Transit Database 4

Internet Reporting Login

5

2010 National Transit Database Highlights NTD Reporters by Organization

Urban and Rural NTD Reporters by Organization Type (January 2010 – December 2010)

Urbanized Areas not Served by Public Transit

Ridership

Transit Ridership Versus Employment (January 2003 – January 2011)

Safety

Annual Transit Fatality Data (January 2000 – December 2010)

Funding Sources

Public Funding for Transit by Government Jurisdiction (January 2000 – December 2010)

Capital and Operating Funding for Transit by Funding Source (January 2008 to December 2010)

Uses of Federal Funds by UZAs Over 200k in Population (January 2010 – December 2010)

Uses of Federal Funds by UZAs Under 200k in Population (January 2010 – December 2010)

Transit Asset Data

Transit Active Fleet by Vehicle Type (January 2010 – December 2010)

Change in Fixed Route Bus Service Fuel Types (January 2002 – December 2010)

Transit Operating Cost and Fares

Operating Cost per Vehicle Hour by Mode (January 2010 – December 2010)

Change in Transit Agency Fringe Benefits Expenses (January 2000 – December 2010)

Transit Agencies Operating Costs per Revenue Hour versus Farebox Recovery Ratio (January 2010 – December 2010)

Average Fare and Costs per Trip for Top 50 Fixed-Route Bus Services

NTD Transit Agency Profile Summary

Summary of Profiles for Top 50 Reporting Agencies (2010 Report Year)

WMATA Transit Agency Profile (Fiscal Year 2010)

Federal Transit Administration

What Is Reported to the NTD?

Sources of funds

Capital and operating expenditures

Amount of service provided

Ridership

Capital assets

Reports vary in detail by size of the

transit system reporting

Federal Transit Administration National Transit Database 7

Urban Reporting Agencies (5307)

729 Reporting Agencies

450 UZAs

Federal Transit Administration National Transit Database 8

Rural Transit Reporting

Agencies in South Dakota

Federal Transit Administration

Urban NTD Reporters

(729 Total)

9

Transit

Agency,

34%

Subsidiaries

Reporting

Separately,

2%

City or

County,

48%

Merged

Reports

(81 Total), 1%

State DOT

or

MPO, 5%

University,

1%

Non-Profit,

2%

Private

For-Profit,

3%

Other, 12

2%

Transit

Agency, 8%

Tribal

Subrecipients,

5%

City or

County,

42%

Urban Recipients

10%

State DOT

or MPO,

2% University, 5

0.5%

Non-Profit,

27%

Private For-

Profit,

4%

Rural

Transfers, 1%

Other,

0.5%

Who Reports To The NTD?

Rural NTD Reporters

(1580 Total)

2010

Federal Transit Administration

Urbanized Areas – UZA

• 466 UZAs

• 16 Have no fixed route bus service

• 450 UZAs reporting

This exhibit contains data from July 2006 to October 2011. Weighted monthly NTD ridership data is available from 2002 onward. The gas price overlay is a 12 month average gas price

and therefore ridership, employment, and gas data are all 12 month averages. The graph uses 12 month weighted averages, thereby giving a more accurate representation of the monthly

NTD data. However, the ridership and employment data have been indexed for a clear comparison

11

Source: National Transit Database, U.S. Energy Information Administration's Gas Pump Data History, and Bureau of Labor Statistics' Employment Data.

$1.00

$1.50

$2.00

$2.50

$3.00

$3.50

$4.00

$4.50

94

96

98

100

102

104

106

108

Jul '06 Jan '07 Jul '07 Jan '08 Jul '08 Jan '09 Jul '09 Jan '10 Jul '10 Jan '11 Jul '11

Ind

ex J

ul '

06

= 1

00

R

ider

ship

, Em

plo

ymen

t

Index of Weighted

Nonfarm Employment,

Seasonally Adjusted

12-Month Weighted Ridership

12-Month Weighted Price of Regular Gas, All Formulations

Transit ridership is slowly recovering from lower employment and a crash in gas prices

Transit Ridership Versus

Average Gas Price and Employment

12

Higher Ridership Has Reduced the Fatality Rate per 100 Million PMT

Even as Total Fatalities Have Remained Relatively Constant

Source: National Transit Database Report Years 2000 to 2010 —Transit Safety and Security Statistics and Analysis Reporting.

Note: Exhibit includes data for CR, DR, HR, LR, and MB. Also, fatality totals include both directly operated (DO) and purchase transportation (PT) service

types.

0.56

0.52

0.55

0.50

0.48 0.47

0.44

0.48

0.42

0.44

0.41

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

No

n-S

uic

ide

/ H

om

icid

e Fa

talit

ies

per

10

0 M

illio

n P

MT

Tota

l Fat

alit

ies

346

322

306

282 284 291 288

332

296

333

303

Oth

er F

atal

itie

s Su

icid

es

Non-Suicide/Homicide Fatalities per 100 Million PMT

Suic

ides

O

ther

Fat

alit

ies

Homicides

Homicides

13

Total Public Funding for Transit by

Government Jurisdiction

Source: National Transit Database Report Year 2010.

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

$0

$5

$10

$15

$20

$25

$30

$35

$40

$45

Fed

eral

Sh

are

of

Fun

din

g

Bill

ion

s o

f C

on

stan

t 2

01

0 D

olla

rs

Year

2010 Federal Funding: $10.4B

2010 State and Local Funding: $30B

2010 Total Funding: $40.4b

26% 26%

2010 Federal Funding:

$6.8B 2000 Federal Funding:

2010 State and Local Funding:

$27M

Federal Share, %

Federal

Funding

State and Local

Funding

The Federal share of total transit funding has remained relatively constant over 10 years

2000 State and Local Funding:

14

Funding Source: Federal, State, Local

$0

$5

$10

$15

$20

$25

$30

$35

$40

2008 2009 2010 2008 2009 2010

1.5%

Bil

lio

ns

of

Curr

ent

Do

llar

s

Source: National Transit Database Report Years

Operating Capital

System Generated Revenue

33%

Local 32%

State 28%

Federal 7%

37%

29%

25%

8%

38%

28%

25%

7%

ARRA 1%

29%

12%

Federal

39%

18%

14%

40%

6%

35%

4%

State 13%

Federal

40%

System

Generated

Revenue

7%

Local

33%

ARRA

10%

ARRA (American Recovery & Reinvestment Act of 2009) Raised Federal Funding for

Capital Expenditures from 40% to 50%

50%

15

$-

$1

$2

$3

$4

$5

$6

$7

Capital Expenditures Operating Expenditures

Fed

eral

Fu

nd

s A

lloca

ted

(B

illio

ns)

Source: National Transit Database Report Year 2010.

Other ARRA Funds

ARRA 5307 Funds

5309 Funds

5307 Funds 5307 Preventative

Maintenance Funds

5307 Funds

5309 Funds

Other Federal

Other Federal

ARRA 5307 Funds Other ARRA

Large UZAs (over 200k Population)

Nearly Half of 5307 Funds

Are Used for Preventive Maintenance Expenses

Preventive Maintenan

Capital 52%

FGM, New Starts,

Bus Discretionary

JARC, New Freedom, Homeland Security, etc.

$6.4B

$3.2B

Usage of 5307 Funds

16

$-

$50

$100

$150

$200

$250

$300

$350

$400

Capital Expenditures Operating Expenditures

Fed

eral

Fu

nd

s A

lloca

ted

(M

illio

ns)

Source: National Transit Database Report Year 2010.

Other ARRA Funds

ARRA 5307 Funds

5309 Funds

5307 Funds

Other Federal

5307 Funds

5307 Preventative Maintenance Funds

Other Federal

ARRA 5307 Funds Other ARRA

Federal Funding in Small UZAs (Under 200k Population)

$343.9M $269.4M

Capital Operating

17

58% of the Transit Fleet is in UZAs Over 1 Million

Source: National Transit Database Report Year 2010.

Notes:

*Source for "Special Service Vehicles" is the FTA, Fiscal Year Trends Report on the Use of Section 5310 Elderly and Persons with Disabilities Program Funds, 2002.

* *"Other Regular Vehicles" includes automated guideway vehicles, automobiles, cable cars, ferryboats, inclinded plane vehicles, jitneys, públicos, taxicabs, and trolleybuses.

87

125

136

2,386

23,136

8,735

27,613

21,929

719

1,993

2,626

3,504

8,609

11,434

24,723

10,107

52,573

0 20,000 40,000 60,000

Commuter Rail Locomotives

Light Rail Vehicles

Self-Propelled Commuter Rail

Commuter Rail Passenger Cars

Other Regular Vehicles**

Heavy Rail Vehicles

Rural Service Regular Vehicles

Vans

Special Service Vehicles*

Buses

Active Vehicles

Vehicles in Areas with Population of 1 Million

or more 58%

Vehicles in Areas of

Populations with Under 1

Million 42%

Data set includes all motorbus vehicles in fixed route service as reported in Urban NTD 2002 to 2010 report years.

* Other includes Bunker fuel, Electric battery, Ethanol, Grain additive, Kerosene, Liquefied natural gas (LNG), Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and fuel types reported as "other" in the

NTD.

** The diesel category contains bio-diesel and diesel fuel vehicles. 18

Annual

Mo

torb

us

Veh

icle

s R

epo

rted

to

Urb

an N

TD

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

2002 2003 2004 2006 2005 2007 2008 2009 2010

In 2001, CNG

vehicles accounted

for 8.7% of all MB

vehicles reported to

the NTD

In 2010, CNG represented

14.4% of all MB vehicles

reported to the NTD

Diesel Fuel**

CNG

Dual Fuel

Other*

Gasoline

Hybrid

Fixed-Route Bus Emissions

Cleaner Since 2002

19

Operating Cost per Vehicle Revenue Hour by Mode

Source: National Transit Database Report Year 2010.

Op

erat

ing C

ost

per

Veh

icle

Rev

enue

Ho

ur

Fixed-Route Bus Service Remains Cheaper

Per Vehicle - Hour than Rail Services

$246

$393

$160

$199

$245

$480

$120

$64 $61 $33

$54 $32

$0

$50

$100

$150

$200

$250

$300

$350

$400

$450

$500

Automated Guideway

Cable Car Inclined Plane

Heavy Rail Light Rail Commuter Rail

Fixed-Route Bus

Demand Response

Demand Response

Taxi

Vanpool Rural Bus-Only

Systems

Rural DR-Only

Systems

20 Source: National Transit Database Report Years 2000 and 2010.

Commuter Rail

Heavy Rail

Commuter Rail

Operating Expenses per Vehicle Revenue Hour: 2000 vs. 2010 C

onst

ant

20

10

Do

llar

s

$176 $201

$106 $99 $106 $97

$54 $56 $30 $41

$116

$163

$55 $80 $60 $70

$27 $40

$11 $23

$-

$100

$200

$300

$400

$500

$600

CR 2000 CR 2010 HR 2000 HR 2010 LR 2000 LR 2010 Bus 2000 Bus 2010 DR 2000 DR 2010

Other

Tires & Tubes

Fuel & Lube

Fringe Benefits

Salaries & Wages

$520

$388

$179

$198

$227

$251

$105

$128

$56

$105

Fringe benefits have increased faster than inflation for all modes

MTA NYCT

WMATA

CTA

BART

MBTA

MARTA

SEPTA

LA Metro

PATH Tri-Met

Denver RTD

San Diego MTS

MTA (Maryland)

Miami-Dade Transit

St. Louis Metro

MUNI

DART

PATCO

Sacramento RTD

NJ Transit

UTA

VTA (San Jose)

Sound Transit

Valley Metro Rail (Phoenix)

Tren Urbano Staten Island Railway

Cleveland RTA

Metro Transit (Minneapolis)

Port Authority (Pittsburgh)

NORTA

NFTA

Houston Metro

CATS (Charlotte)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

$100 $150 $200 $250 $300 $350 $400 $450 $500

Fare

bo

x R

eco

very

Rat

io

Operating Cost per Revenue Hour

21

Data for HR & LR modes, only.

Source: National Transit Database Report Year 2010.

Many rail systems have farebox recovery ratios between

20% and 40% and an operating cost per hour of between $200 and $350

More Expensive Less Expensive

Cost per Hour vs. Farebox Recovery for Heavy and Light Rail Systems

MTA NYC Transit

LA Metro

NJ Transit

CTA

Houston Metro

SEPTA

WMATA

Denver RTD

King County Metro

Miami-Dade

DART MARTA

MTA Bus Co. (NYC)

MBTA

MTA (Maryland)

Port Authority (Pittsburgh)

Metro Transit (Minneapolis)

AC Transit

Tri-Met

OCTA

Pace

VIA (San Antonio)

Phoenix MUNI

Honolulu

San Diego

UTA

RTC (Las Vegas) St. Louis Metro

Milwaukee

VTA (San Jose) Lynx (Orlando)

Broward Cnty Detroit DOT

Capital Metro (Austin)

Cleveland RTD

Ride-On

Sound Transit

Foothill Transit

Hampton Roads

MTA Long Island Bus

CATS(Charlotte)

SMART

NFTA

JTA (Jacksonville)

COTA

PSTA(Tampa)

SWORTA

RIPTA Omnitrans

$-

$0.20

$0.40

$0.60

$0.80

$1.00

$1.20

$1.40

$1.60

$1.80

$2.00

$2.00 $3.00 $4.00 $5.00 $6.00 $7.00 $8.00

Ave

rage

Far

e

Operating Cost per Trip

Fixed-Route Bus Systems Ranked by Most Vehicle

Revenue Miles 1-10

11-25

26-50

Colors Indicate Farebox Recovery

Ratio Black: >40%

Green: 30-39% Blue: 20-29%

22

Average Fare and Costs per Trip for Top 50 Fixed-Route Bus Services

Average fares cover only 20% - 40% of a bus trip

Federal Transit Administration 23

Federal Transit Administration 24

Federal Transit Administration

Questions?

John D. Giorgis

National Transit Database Program Manager

Federal Transit Administration

US Department of Transportation

[email protected]