National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge,...

43
National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.200 6 AMENDMENTS TO CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Purpose & Perspectives

Transcript of National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge,...

Page 1: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

National Judicial Academy, New Delhi

Dr. Justice G.C. BharukaChairman, E-Committee

Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka

27.07.2006

AMENDMENTS

TO

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDUREPurpose & Perspectives

Page 2: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

Amendments to CPC

The purpose of recent amendments made by Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 1999 (46 of 1999) and Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2002 (22 of 2002) (w.e.f. from 01.07.2002) is accelerate the progression of civil cases from one stage to another within a set/expected time frame, reduce adjournments, and help in reduction of congestion and delays in the courts. The legislative scheme is in consonance with the core principles of caseflow management which requires the movement of cases from one stage to another with in the desired time frame under effective direction and control of the Court.

Page 3: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

Institution of Suit

Page 4: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

Section 26. Institution of suits.-

 

(1) Every suit shall be instituted by the presentation of a plaint or in such other manner as may be prescribed.

 

(2) In every plaint, facts shall be proved by affidavit.

 

Page 5: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

Order IV, Rule 1. Suit to be commenced by plaint.-

 (1) Every suit shall be instituted by presenting a plaint in duplicate to the Court or such officer as it appoints in this behalf.

 (2) Every plaint shall comply with the rules contained in Orders VI and VII, so far as they are applicable.

 (3) The plaint shall not be deemed to be duly instituted unless it complies with the requirements specified in sub-rules (1) and (2).

Order VI, Rule 15. Verification of Pleadings.-

(4) The person verifying the pleading shall also furnish affidavit in support of his pleadings.

Page 6: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

Issue of Summons

Page 7: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

Section 27. Summons to defendants.-

 Where a suit has been duly instituted, a summons may be issued to the defendant to appear and answer the claim and may be served in manner prescribed on such day not beyond thirty days from date of the institution of the suit.

Page 8: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

Order V, Rule 1. Summons.-  

(1) When a suit has been duly instituted, a summons may be issued to the defendant to appear and answer the claim and to file the written statement of his defence, if any, with in thirty days from the date of service of summons of the defendant:

 

Provided that no such summons shall be issued when the defendant has appeared at the presentation of the plaint and admitted the plaintiff's claim:

 

Provided further that where the defendant fails to file the written statement within the said period of thirty days, he shall be allowed to file the same on such other day as may be specified by the court, for reasons to be recorded in writing, but which not shall not be later that ninety days from the date of service of summons.

Page 9: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

Order VII, Rule 9. Procedure on admitting plaint.-

Where the Court orders that the summons be served on the defendants in the manner provided in Rule 9 of Order V, it will direct the plaintiff to present as many copies of the plaint on plain paper as there are defendants within seven days from the date of such order along with requisite fee for service of summons on the defendants.

Page 10: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

Order VII, Rule 11. Rejection of plaint.-

The plaint shall be rejected in the following cases:-

(e) where it is not filed in duplicate;

(f) where the plaintiff fails to comply with the provisions of rule 9

Page 11: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

Delivery of Summons

Page 12: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

Order V, Rule 9. Delivery of summons by Court.-(1) Where the defendant resides within the jurisdiction of the Court in

which the suit is instituted, or has an agent resident within that jurisdiction who is empowered to accept the service of the summons, the summons shall, unless the Court otherwise directs, be delivered or sent either to the proper officer to be served by him or one of his subordinates or to such courier services as are approved by the Court.

 (2) The proper officer may be an officer of a Court other than that in which

the suit is instituted, and, where he is such an officer, the summons may be sent to him in such manner as the Court may direct.

 (3) The services of summons may be made by delivering or transmitting a

copy thereof by registered post acknowledgement due, addressed to the defendant or his agent empowered to accept the service or by speed post or by such courier services as are approved by the High Court or by the Court referred to in sub-rule (1) or by any other means of transmission of documents (including fax message or electronic mail service) provided by the rules made by the High Court:

Provided that the service of summons under this sub-rule shall be made at the expenses of the plaintiff.

Page 13: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

(4) … … …

(5) … … … (6) The High Court or the District Judge, as the case may be, shall

prepare a panel of courier agencies for the purposes of sub-rule (1).

9-A. Summons given to the plaintiff for service :- The Court may, in addition to the service of summons under Rule 9,

on the application of the plaintiff for the issue of a summons for the appearance of the defendant, permit such plaintiff to effect service of such summons on such defendant and shall, in such a case, deliver the summons to such plaintiff for service.

(1) … … …(2) … … …(3) … … … 

Page 14: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

Section 19-A. Simultaneous issue of summons for service by post in addition to personal service

Deleted by the 1999 Amendment

Page 15: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

Order IX, Rule 2.Dismissal of suit where summons not served in consequence of plaintiff's failure to pay costs.-

 Where on the day so fixed it is found that the summons has not been served upon the defendant in consequence of their failure of the plaintiff to pay the Court-fee or postal charges, if any, chargeable for such service, or failure to present copies of the plaint required by Rule 9 of Order VII, the Court may make an order that the suit be dismissed:

Provided that no such order shall be made if, notwithstanding such failure, the defendant attends in person or by agent when he is allowed to appear by agent on the day fixed for him to appear and answer.

Page 16: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

Order IX, Rule 5. Dismissal of suit where plaintiff, after summons returned unserved, fails for seven days to apply for fresh summons.

(1) Where, after a summons has been issued to the defendant, or to one of several defendants, and returned unserved, the plaintiff fails, for a period of seven days from the date of the return made to the Court by the officer ordinarily certifying to the Court returns made by the serving officers to apply for the issue of a fresh summons, the Court shall make an order that the suit be dismissed as against such defendant, unless the plaintiff has within the said period satisfied the Court that

(a) he has failed using his best endeavors to discover the residence of the defendant, who has not been served, or

(b) such defendant is avoiding service of process, or

(c) there is any other sufficient cause for extending the time,

in which case the Court may extend the time for making such application for such period as it thinks fit.

(2) In such case the plaintiff may (subject to the law of limitation) bring a fresh suit.

Page 17: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

Written Statement

Page 18: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

Order VIII, Rule 1. Written Statement

The defendant shall, within thirty days from the date of service of summons on him, present a written statement of his defence:

 Provided that where the defendant fails to file the written statement within the said period of thirty days, he shall be allowed to file the same on such other day, as may be specified by the Court, for reasons to be recorded in writing, but which shall not be later than ninety days from the date of service of summons.

(Also refer Order V, Rule 1)

Order VI, Rule 15. Verification of Pleadings.-

(4) The person verifying the pleading shall also furnish affidavit in support of his pleadings.

Page 19: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

Order VIII, Rule 9. Subsequent pleadings.-

No pleading subsequent to the written statement of a defendant other than by way of defence to set-off or counter claim shall be presented except by the leave of the Court and upon such terms as the Court thinks fit; but the Court may at any time require a written statement or additional written statement from any of the parties and fix a time of not more than thirty days for presenting the same.

 

Order VIII, Rule 10. Procedure when party fails to present written statement called for by Court.-

Where any party from whom a written statement is required under Rule 1 or Rule 9 fails to present the same within the time permitted or fixed by the Court, as the case may be, the Court shall pronounce judgment against him, or make such order in relation to the suit as it thinks fit and on the pronouncement of such judgment a decree shall be drawn up.

Page 20: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

Amendment of Pleading

Page 21: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

Order VI, Rule 17. Amendment of pleadings.- The Court may at any stage of the proceedings allow either party to alter or amend his pleadings in such manner and on such terms as may be just, and all such amendments shall be made as may be necessary for the purpose of determining the real questions in controversy between the parties:

 Provided that no application for amendment shall be allowed

after the trial has commenced, unless the Court comes to the conclusion that in spite of due diligence, the party could not have raised the matter before the commencement of trial.

 

Order VI, Rule 18. Failure to amend after Order.- If a party who has obtained an order for leave to amend does not amend accordingly within the time limited for the purpose by the order, or if no time is thereby limited then within fourteen days from the date of the order, he shall not be permitted to amend after the expiration of such limited time as aforesaid or of such fourteen days, as the case may be, unless the time is extended by the Court.

Page 22: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

Documents

Page 23: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

Order VII, Rule 14. Production of document on which plaintiff sues or relies.-

(1) Where a plaintiff sues upon a document or relies upon document in his possession or power in support of his claim, he shall enter such documents in a list, and shall produce it in Court when the plaint is presented by him and shall, at the same time deliver the document and a copy thereof, to be filed with the plaint.(2) Where any such document is not in the possession or power of the plaintiff, he shall, wherever possible, state in whose possession or power it is.(3) A document which ought to be produced in Court by the plaintiff when the plaint is presented, or to be entered in the list to be added or annexed to the plaint but is not produced or entered accordingly, shall not, without the leave of the Court, be received in evidence on his behalf at the hearing of the suit. (4) Nothing in this rule shall apply to document produced for the cross examination of the plaintiffs witnesses, or, handed over to a witness merely to refresh his memory.

Page 24: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

Order VIII1A. Duty of defendant to produce documents upon which relief is claimed or relied upon by him.—(1) Where the defendant bases his defence upon a document or relies upon any document in his possession or power, in support of his defence or claim for set off or counter claim, he shall enter such document in a list, and shall produce it in Court when the written statement is presented by him and shall, at the same time, deliver the document and a copy thereof, to be filed with the written statement.

(2) Where any such document is not in the possession or power of the defendant, he shall, wherever possible, state in whose possession or power it is.

(3) A document which ought to be produced in Court by the defendant under this rule, but, is not so produced shall not, without the leave of the Court, be received in evidence on his behalf at the hearing of the suit;

(4) Nothing in this rule shall apply to documents—

(a) produced for the cross-examination of the plaintiff's witnesses, or

(b) handed over to a witness merely to refresh his memory.;

Page 25: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

Order XIII, Rule 1. Documentary evidence to be produced at or before the settlement of issues.-

(1) The parties or their pleader shall produce on or before the settlement of issues, all the documentary evidence in original where the copies thereof have been filed along with plaint or written statement.

(2) The Court shall receive the documents so produced:

Provided that they are accompanied by an accurate list thereof prepared in such form as the High Court directs.

(3) Nothing in sub-rule (1) shall apply to documents—

(a) produced for the cross-examination of the witnesses of the other party; or

(b) handed over to a witness merely to refresh his memory.

Page 26: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

Adjournments

Page 27: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

Order XVII, Rule 1. Court may grant time and adjourn hearing.-

(1) The Court may, if sufficient cause is shown, at any stage of the suit, grant time to the parties or to any of them, and may from time to time adjourn the hearing of the suit for reasons to be recorded in writing:

Provided that no such adjournment shall be granted more than three times to a party during hearing of the suit.

(2) Costs of adjournment.-

In every such case the Court shall fix a day for the further hearing of the suit, and shall make such orders as to costs occasioned by the adjournment or such higher costs as the court deems fit :

Page 28: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

Examination of Parties by Court

Page 29: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

Order X, Rule 4. Consequence of refusal or inability of pleader to answer.-

(1) Where the pleader of any party who appears by a pleader or any such person accompanying a pleader as is referred to in rule 2, refuses or is unable to answer any material question relating to the suit which the Court is of opinion that the party whom he represents ought to answer, and is likely to be able to answer if interrogated in person, the Court may postpone the hearing of the suit to a day not later than seven days from the day of first hearing and direct that such party a shall appear in person on such day.

(2) If such party fails without lawful excuse to appear in person on the day so appointed, the Court may pronounce Judgment against him, or make such order in relation to the suit as it thinks fit.

Page 30: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

Order XI, Rule 2. Particular interrogatories to be submitted.-

On an application for leave to deliver interrogatories' the particular interrogatories proposed to be delivered shall be submitted to the Court and that Court shall decide within seven days from the day of filing of the same return. In deciding upon such application, the Court shall take into account any offer, which may be made by the party sought to be interrogated to deliver particulars, or to make admissions, or to produce documents relating to the matters in question, or any of them, and leave shall be given as to such only of the interrogatories submitted as the Court shall consider necessary either for disposing fairly of the suit or for saving costs.

Page 31: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

Alternative Dispute Resolution

Page 32: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

89.Arbitration.-[Repealed by the Arbitration Act, 1940 (10 of 1940), sec. 49 and Sch.III Settlement of disputes outside the Court.—(1) Where it appears to the Court that there exist elements of a settlement which may be acceptable to the parties, the Court shall formulate the terms of settlement and give them to the parties for their observations and after receiving the observations of the parties, the Court may reformulate the terms of a possible settlement and refer the same for—(a) arbitration;(b) conciliation;(c) judicial settlement including settlement through Lok Adalat; or(d) mediation.(2) Where a dispute has been referred—(a) for arbitration or conciliation, the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (26 of 1996) shall apply as if the proceedings for arbitration or conciliation were referred for settlement under the provisions of that Act;

Page 33: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

(b) to Lok Adalat, the Court shall refer the same to the Lok Adalat in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (1) of section 20 of the Legal Services Authority Act, 1987 (39 of 1987) and all other provisions of that Act shall apply in respect of the dispute so referred to the Lok Adalat;

(c) for judicial settlement, the Court shall refer the same to a suitable institution or person and such institution or person shall be deemed to be a Lok Adalat and all the provisions of the Legal Services Authority Act, 1987 (39 of 1987) shall apply as if the dispute were referred to a Lok Adalat under the provisions of that Act;

(d) for mediation, the Court shall effect a compromise between the parties and shall follow such procedure as may be prescribed.

Page 34: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

Order X1A. Direction of the Court to opt for any one mode of alternative dispute resolution.—After recording the admissions and denials, the Court shall direct the parties to the suit to opt either mode of the settlement outside the Court as specified in sub-section (1) of section 89. On the option of the parties, the Court shall fix the date of appearance before such forum or authority as may be opted by the parties.

1B. Appearance before the conciliatory forum or authority.—Where a suit is referred under rule 1A, the parties shall appear before such forum or authority for conciliation of the suit.

1C. Appearance before the Court consequent to the failure of efforts of conciliation.—Where a suit is referred under rule 1A and the presiding officer of conciliation forum or authority is satisfied that it would not be proper in the interest of justice to proceed with the matter further, then, it shall refer the matter again to the Court and direct the parties to appear before the Court on the date fixed by it.

Page 35: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

Examination of Witnesses

Page 36: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

Order XVIII, Rule 4. Recording of evidence

(1) In every case, the examination in chief of a witness shall be on affidavit and copies thereof shall be supplied to the opposite party by the party who calls him for evidence.

Provided that where documents are filed and the parties rely upon the documents, the proof and admissibility of such documents which are filed along with affidavit shall be subject to the orders of the Court.

 (2) The evidence (cross-examination and re-examination) of the witness in attendance, whose evidence (examination-in-chief) by affidavit has been furnished to the Court shall be taken either by the Court or by the Commissioner appointed by it:

 Provided that the Court may, while appointing a commission under this sub-rule, consider taking into account such relevant factors as it thinks fit:

 (3) The Court or the Commissioner, as the case may be, shall record evidence either in writing or mechanically in the present of the Judge or of the Commissioner, as the case may be, and where such evidence is recorded by the Commissioner he shall return such evidence together with his report in writing signed by him to the Court appointing him and the evidence taken under it shall form part of the record of the suit.

Page 37: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

Order XVIII, Rule 4. Recording of evidence

(4) The Commissioner may record such remarks as it thinks material respecting the demeanor of any witness while under examination:

Provided that any objection raised during the recording of evidence before the Commissioner shall be recorded by him and decided by the Court at the stage of arguments.

(5) The report of the Commissioner shall be submitted to the Court appointing the commission within sixty days from the date of issue of the commission unless the Court for reasons to be recorded in writing extends the time.

(6) The High Court or the District Judge, as the case may be, shall prepare a panel of Commissioners to record the evidence under this rule.

(7) The Court may by general or special order fix the amount to be paid as remuneration for the services of the Commissioner.

(8) The provisions of Rules 16, 16-A, 17 and 18 of Order XXVI, in so far as they are applicable, shall apply to the issue, execution and return of such commissions under this rule.

Page 38: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

Arguments in the Suit

Page 39: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

Order XVIII

(3-A) Any party may address oral arguments in a case, and shall, before he concludes the oral arguments, if any, submit if the Court so permits concisely and under distinct headings written arguments in support of his case to the Court and such written arguments shall form part of the record.

(3-B) A copy of such written arguments shall be simultaneously furnished to the opposite party.

(3-C) No adjournment shall be granted for the purpose of filing the written arguments unless the Court, for reasons to be recorded in writing, considers it necessary to grant such adjournment.

(3-D) The Court shall fix such time-limits for the oral arguments by either of the parties in a case, as it thinks fit

Page 40: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

Judgment and Decrees

Page 41: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

Order XX, Rule 1.Judgment when pronounced.-

(1) The Court, after the case has been heard, shall pronounce judgment in an open court, either at once, or as soon thereafter as may be practicable and when the judgment is to be pronounced on some future day, the Court shall fix a day for that purpose, of which due notice shall be given to the parties or their pleader:

Provided that where the judgment is not pronounced at once, every endeavor shall be made by the Court to pronounce the judgment within thirty days from the date on which the hearing of the case was concluded but, where it is not practicable so to do on the ground of the exceptional and extraordinary circumstances of the case, the Court shall fix a future day for the pronouncement of the judgment, and such day shall not ordinarily be a day beyond sixty days from the date on which the hearing of the case was concluded, and due notice of the day so fixed shall be given to the parties or their pleaders

(2) Where a written judgment is to be pronounced, it shall be sufficient if the findings of the Court on each issue and the final order passed in the case are read out and it shall not be necessary for the Court to read out the whole

judgment. [ *** ]

Page 42: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

Order XX

6A. Preparation of decree.— (1) Every endeavour shall be made to ensure that the decree is drawn up as expeditiously as possible and, in any case, within fifteen days from the date on which the judgment is pronounced.

(2) An appeal may be preferred against the decree without filing a copy of the decree and in such a case the copy made available to the party by the Court shall for the purposes of rule 1 of Order XLI be treated as the decree. But as soon as the decree is drawn, the judgment shall cease to have the effect of a decree for the purposes of execution or for any other purpose.

6B. Copies of judgments when to be made available.— Where the judgment is pronounced, copies of the judgment shall be made available to the parties immediately after the pronouncement of the judgment for preferring an appeal on payment of such charges as may be specified in the rule made by the High Court.

Page 43: National Judicial Academy, New Delhi Dr. Justice G.C. Bharuka Chairman, E-Committee Former Judge, High Courts of Patna & Karnataka 27.07.2006 AMENDMENTS.

THANK YOU