Nanocrystalline silicon thin film transistor (nc si h tf-ts)-a device

International Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering & Technology (IJECET), ISSN 0976 – 6464(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6472(Online), Special Issue (November, 2013), © IAEME

International Conference on Communication Systems (ICCS-2013) October 18-20, 2013 B K Birla Institute of Engineering & Technology (BKBIET), Pilani, India 15

Nanocrystalline Silicon Thin Film Transistor (nc-Si:H TFTs)-A Device

for Display Panels

Prachi Sharma1, Navneet Gupta2

Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology and Science Pilani, Rajasthan, India

[email protected], [email protected]

ABSTRACT: Nanocrystalline silicon (nc-Si:H) has recently emerged as a possible alternative to both hydrogenated amorphous silicon and polycrystalline silicon for high speed large area displays. In this paper, a global overview is presented on the nanocrystalline silicon TFT technology, which includes TFT structure, operation, channel materials, characteristics and device performance. The various physical effects involved in the conduction mechanism of nc-Si:H are also discussed. KEYWORDS: Nanocrystalline silicon (nc-Si:H), Thin-film transistors (TFTs), Threshold-voltage shift (∆VT), Density of states (DOS), Hydrogenated amorphous silicon (a-Si:H), Polycrystalline silicon (poly-Si)

I. INTRODUCTION From the mid-1980s the silicon-based thin film transistors (TFTs) are used as switching elements and for fabrication of their peripheral driving circuits in large area electronics [1-3]. Large- area electronics involves various applications in which low speed, micrometer size transistors are sufficient in spite of sophisticated transistors. The aim of these applications is to spread electronic components over large area substrate at low fabrication cost. Active matrix liquid crystal displays (AMLCDs) [1], organic light-emitting diode displays (OLEDs) [2], radio-frequency identification (RFID) tags [3], medical X-ray imager [4] are the important applications of large area electronics. The most beneficial aspect of TFT technology is a separate transistor for each pixel on the display. As each transistor is small, the amount of charge needed to control it is also small. This allows for very fast re-drawing of the display. For fabricating thin film transistors, different materials are used as an active layer. The commonly used materials are amorphous hydrogenated silicon (a-Si:H) and polycrystalline silicon (poly-Si). The main advantage of a-Si:H is the possibility for deposition over large area at relatively low temperature (below 450˚C) [5]. Plasma Enhanced Chemical Vapour Deposition (PECVD) is commonly used for the deposition of amorphous silicon over large area at low temperatures. The material obtained by PECVD is a-Si:H. The a-Si:H is an amorphous silicon

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY (IJECET)

ISSN 0976 – 6464(Print) ISSN 0976 – 6472(Online) Special Issue (November, 2013), pp. 115-127 © IAEME: www.iaeme.com/ijecet.asp Journal Impact Factor (2013): 5.8896 (Calculated by GISI) www.jifactor.com

IJECET © I A E M E


International Conference on Communication Systems (ICCS-2013) October 18-20, 2013 B K Birla Institute of Engineering & Technology (BKBIET), Pilani, India Page 116

alloy with incorporated hydrogen atoms. However the disadvantages of a-Si:H are low electron mobility and instability. The low temperature PECVD process used for a-Si:H deposition as well as the amorphous nature of non-crystalline substrate (like glass), lead to the formation of amorphous material having missing atoms. Deep defect states in the forbidden energy gap of the a-Si:H are associated with these missing atoms, i.e. dangling bonds. Deep defect states are also associated with the deviation in bond length and angle which results in states below the conduction band, known as band tail states. The density of states (DOS) in a-Si:H is in the range 1015-1018 cm-3eV-1. The electrons are frequently trapped into and released from these band tail states leading to the low mobility. Thus a-Si:H has electron mobility as low as 0.1-1 cm2V-1s-1 [6] and hole mobility is so low that the p-type devices are not used in any application. Although this low electron mobility is sufficient for pixel switch applications and LCDs [7]. In addition to low electron mobility, a-Si:H also suffers from bias stress induced degradation and light induced degradation. As a consequence, the electrical characteristics of TFTs (like VT, field effect mobility and sub threshold slope) change and this damages the overall device performance [9, 10]. As TFTs in LCD and X-ray imager pixel devices are not subject to prolonged gate voltages thus for these devices instability is not a major issue. When a-Si:H goes under annealing process, it can be transformed into poly-Si. Poly-Si is having low hydrogen atoms in large grained silicon films and thus poly-Si is not called as “hydrogenated”. The main advantages of poly-Si are high electron mobility and better stability. Since poly-Si is a network of randomly oriented crystalline grains interconnected by thin grain boundaries, the defects in poly-Si are concentrated in the grain boundaries whereas in a-Si:H materials they are uniformly distributed in the bulk. In case of poly-Si, large grains are preferred, as the larger grain size results in lesser grain boundaries across the channel. This results in lower density of defect states [11] in poly-Si, leading to lesser trapping of carriers at grain boundaries and hence higher mobility (~100 cm2V-1s-1) [7] than a-Si:H materials. Poly-Si TFTs provide sufficient electron and hole mobility in n-type and p-type devices for CMOS (complementary metal oxide semiconductor) operation. Due to high mobility, poly-Si can also be applicable to peripheral circuits like multiplexers etc. The main problem with poly-Si is that the crystallization process requires a much higher temperature (usually higher than 300˚C) than the a-Si:H deposition temperature. In addition to this problem, poly-Si also suffers from poor spatial uniformity as random positioning of grain boundaries causes irregularity across the channel. This results in mobility and threshold voltage non-uniformity over large area substrate [7, 12]. Nanocrystalline silicon (nc-Si:H) has been proposed as a promising alternative material to a-Si:H and poly-Si. The advantages of nc-Si:H over a-Si:H are high carrier mobility and better stability. It can have higher field effect mobility than a-Si:H due to the presence of higher silicon crystallites [13] as well as increased doping efficiency. For top gated devices, field effect mobility (µFET) is in range of 40 cm2/Vs [14] to 150 cm2/Vs [15] and for bottom gate, it is in the range of 0.5-3 cm2/Vs [16,17].Due to the presence of lower hydrogen concentration, nc-Si:H have improved stability under bias and illumination stress [13] than a-Si:H. The advantages of nc-Si:H over poly-Si are low processing temperatures (as low as 150˚C), low manufacturing cost and better uniformity [18]. Hot wire chemical vapour deposition (HWCVD) allow direct obtainment of nc-Si:H at very low substrate temperature over large area and at high deposition rates (about 1nm/s) [18].The resulting nc-Si:H film consists of small silicon crystallites than poly-Si, with an average grain size of a few nanometers, embedded into a-Si. However, the main problem with nc-Si TFT is that it is affected from high drain leakage currents, i.e. off-current.



Attribute a-Si:H nc-Si:H Poly-Si Mobility Low Much higher than a-Si:H High Circuit type NMOS NMOS/PMOS NMOS/PMOS Stability Issue More stable than a-Si:H Stable Drive capacity (ION) Large W/L

to reduce VG

Small W/L at small VG

Small W/L at small VG

VT uniformity High High Improving Mobility uniformity High Potentially high Improving Manufacturability Mature RF PECVD New Cost Low Low High

Table 1: Comparison between different materials used for the TFT fabrication II. DEVICE STRUCTURE AND OPERATION

The TFTs consist of three electrodes (i.e. source, drain and gate), gate insulator, and thin semiconductor layer. These elements can be arranged in many ways. Based on the level of the gate electrode, the TFTs are divided into two types, top gate TFT and bottom gate TFT. In top gated TFT, the gate electrode is located above the semiconductor layer whereas in bottom gated TFT, the gate electrode is located below the semiconductor layer. These two types are further subdivided into coplanar and staggered devices, giving a total of four types of basic TFTs structures. The term coplanar/staggered describes the location of source and drain electrodes with respect to the gate electrode. In coplanar case, the source and drain electrodes are located at the same side as the gate electrode while in staggered case, the source and drain electrodes are located at the opposite side to the gate electrode separated with the semiconductor layer.

Fig. 1: Illustration of different TFT structures [19]

III. ELECTRICAL INSTABILITY OF TFTS The a-Si:H and nc-Si TFTs are generally suffers from bias stress degradation due to two major instability mechanisms i.e. defect creation in the a-Si:H active layer and charge trapping in the gate dielectric. The creation of defect states leads to an increasing of the density of states in the band-gap of the channel material and also causes the degradation of electrical characteristics like increasing of the threshold voltage and decreasing of the sub-threshold slope. When defect



state creation take place, it is necessary to apply thermal or bias annealing in order to recover the initial device performance [20, 21]. When charge trapping occurs in the gate insulator or at the channel/insulator interface, then the threshold voltage increases under positive stress and decreases under negative stress. Annealing under special thermal and/or bias conditions is necessary to release the trapped charge from the gate insulator whereas when charge trapped at the channel/insulator interface, it can be released at room temperature without need of annealing. The interface trapped charge has the similar effect on the characteristics as the charge trapped in the bulk of the insulator. The only difference is that the charge trapped in the interface requires less energy in order the charge to be released. Various authors [22, 23] presented the model for carrier-induced defect creation and proposed that hydrogen atom that is available in the channel material diffuses to the weak Si-Si bond and participate in the process where upon the breakage of the weak bond, two dangling bonds are created which one of them is passivated by the hydrogen. Hydrogen diffusion has been found to follow stretched-exponential time dependence and to be dispersive. Authors examined that the resulting dispersive motion of the hydrogen leads to the stretched-exponential time dependence of carrier-induced creation of defects and consequently, the shift in the threshold voltage. Thus authors assumed that defect state creation is the dominant mechanism of the shift in threshold voltage.

∆푉 = 퐶 1 − 푒푥푝 − (1)

Where C ≈ VGS - VT0, VGS is the applied gate-source voltage, also called gate bias stress, VTO is the threshold voltage at time t = 0, and τ and β are a time constant and fitting exponent, respectively. The parameter β has been found to be around 0.5 at room temperature [22, 23]. IV. DRAIN LEAKAGE CURRENT OR OFF-CURRENT A. Top-Gated TFT Various authors examined the leakage current in the top-gated nc-Si:H TFT at various temperatures. Authors proposed that under high 푉 and high 푉 (=10V), the behaviour is reminiscent of the Poole-Frenkel emission in the drain depletion region and Eacontinues to decrease as 푉 increase upto 10V [24].

퐼 = 퐼 exp 훽√퐸 (2)

Where, 퐼 is the generation current at zero electric field. 퐸 is the peak electric field [25].

퐸 = |푉 − 푉 − 푉 | (3)

훽is the PF coefficient [25]

훽 = 푞 / 휋휀 퐾푇 (4)



And under high 푉 (> 0V) and low 푉 (=5V), the leakage current can be attributed to the thermal emission of trapped carriers present at the mid-gap grain boundary states and Ea becomes independent of 푉 .The value of Ea i.e. 0.72±0.002eV is retrieved from the average and standard deviation between 푉 = 0V and 10V

퐼 = 퐼 푒푥푝 − (5)

Where퐼 is independent of temperature and constant. Lee et. al. [25] also proposed that under low gate bias, the leakage current is mainly due to the ohmic conduction through the bulk nc-Si:H channel layer and IL has a weaker gate and drain bias dependence. The increase in resistive leakage current with 푉 can be referring to the increase in peak holes concentration in the bulk. This is the main reason behind the decrement of activation energy from 0.77 to 0.72eV for 푉 =5V. B. Bottom-Gated TFT Authors examined the leakage current in n-channel nc-Si TFTs and proposed that when a high drain voltage (Vds> 0) is applied, the large electric field generated at the reverse n+-p drain junction. This electric field would assist the electrons in the valence band to travel by band to band tunnelling. The use of a-Si and nc-Si double layer beneath the n+ a-Si drain contact is required in order to reduce the leakage current since the a-Si:H has the larger band gap as compare to nc-Si [26]. According to the tunnelling theory, at large drain bias voltages, the tunnelling leakage current is given as [24]

퐼 = 퐴퐹 exp − (6)

Where, A is constant in AcmV-1. F is the maximum electric field at the drain junction [27]

퐹 =( )

+ (7)

Where 푉 is the flat band voltage,푉 = Vd-Vg. 휀 and 푡 is the permittivity and thickness of SiNX, respectively and w is the depletion region of the p-n junction [24]

E = ( ) / /

(8)

Where h is the Planck’s constant divided by 2휋, mr is the tunnelling effective electron mass and Egis the energy gap of the silicon. At low electric fields (E<2.2 MV/cm) [28], the leakage current is dominated by PF conduction. V. PERFORMANCE OF NC-SI:H TFT

Various stochastic effects which affect the performance of nc-Si:H TFT and thus changes the characteristic of the device are:



A. Temperature The defect state creation and thus the shift in the threshold voltage are a function of time and temperature. When device operating temperature increases, the rate of hydrogen diffusion increases which results in an increase in ∆VT. The hydrogen dependence is reflected in the parameter τ as

휏 = 휏 푒푥푝 (9)

Where τ0 has been found to be around 10-10 sec and EA= 0.95eV is the activation energy [22]. Various authors [29] compared the threshold voltage shift of the nc-Si TFTs with that of the a-Si:H counterpart, under similar operation conditions. For example, they electrically stressed the TFTs under constant drain currents of 2, 10, and 15 µA at two temperatures of 22 and 75◦C for 50 hours. And found two fundamental differences in the behavior of nc-Si TFTs compared to that of the a-Si:H TFTs. First, ∆VT in nc-Si TFT saturates at prolonged stress times, but that of a-Si:H TFT does not. Second, ∆VT in nc-Si TFT is weakly temperature dependent, in contrast to that of a-Si:H device. For example, after 50 hours stressing at 15 µA, ∆VT in nc-Si TFT is 3 V and 4 V at 22 and 75◦ C, respectively, whereas that for the a-Si:H TFT is 7.6 V and 21 V, respectively. The observed behavior of ∆VT indicates absence of defect state creation in the nc-Si TFTs. Its weak temperature dependence is consistent with the mechanism proposed by Powell et al. [20], implying that the instability mechanism is charge trapping in the nitride. The kinetics of ∆VT does also follow the stretched exponential time dependence predicted for charge trapping [30, 31]. To further support the conclusion that defect creation is absent in nc-Si TFTs, authors [29] investigated the other attribute of the charge trapping, i.e. its reversibility. It is known that charge trapping is reversible, but defect creation is indefinitely stable and irreversible at room temperature. Authors performed the relaxation test, in which nc-Si TFT was electrically stressed for some time to induce some shift in its threshold voltage. Subsequently, the TFT was relaxed, i.e. bias voltages were removed and device was turned off. From time to time, authors performed a quick test to retrieve its I-V characteristics to see whether the induced ∆VT was disappeared and initial I-V curves were obtained. Authors found that after 5 days relaxation at room temperature, the initial I-V curves can be obtained. This observation is an another evidence indicating that charge trapping in the nitride causes ∆VT in nc-Si TFTs. If defect creation were the source of instability, it may take around a year at room temperature to anneal the created defects and retrieve the initial I-V curves. B. Grain Size Mao [32] proposed a model for the shift of valence and conduction band edges and proposed that valence or conduction band edges are affected by grain size which in turn affects the barrier height at nc-Si/SiO2 interface. This is because it equals to the difference between the barrier height at the bulk-Si/SiO2 interface for electrons and the shift of conduction band edge.

∆퐸 (푑) = ∆ =. .

(eV) (10)



∆퐸 (푑) = ∆ =. .

(eV) (11)

According to above equations [32], the edge of the conduction band or valance band will be shifted by the grain size. Thus barrier height will decrease. The gate leakage current of nc-Si TFTs strongly depends on the silicon-grain size. This results from the large change in the band gap and dielectric constant due to size effects. The screening dielectric constant of nc-Si can be theoretically calculated with the formula [33] below,

휀 (푑) = 1 + ..

×

. (12)

In above equation, the unit of d is meter. The model of quantum confinement, within the effective mass approximation predicts a shift of the valence band edge with size i.e. the valence band edge shifts to larger binding energy in smaller cluster. This shift corresponds to a narrowing of the valence band and correlates well with the optical measurements of band gap broadening. The experimental data of the band gap of nc-Si obey with the formula [34] below,

∆퐸 = 퐸 (푑)− 퐸 (∞) = .×

+ .( × )

(푒푉) (13)

WhereEg(d) is the quantum-dot band gap as a function of radius and Eg(∞) is the bulk band gap. Various authors [35] examined the impact of the grain size of nc-Si on the surface potential of doped nc-Si TFTs and proposed that the change in both dielectric constant and band gap of nc-Si caused by quantum size effects can largely affect on the channel surface potential in nc-Si TFTs. The surface potential affected by the crystal size also has an effect on the tunneling current under a given gate voltage [32]. Mao [35] calculated the surface potential with the formula below,

퐸(휑 ) =

.

. .

⎣⎢⎢⎢⎢⎢⎢⎡

푁 + 휑 +



( ) ( ) /푒푥푝 −

(∞) . .

푘푇 exp − 1 +

ln

⎝

⎜⎜⎜⎜⎛ .

⎝

⎜⎜⎛

. (∞) . . .

⎠

⎟⎟⎞

.

⎝

⎜⎜⎛

. (∞) . . .

⎠

⎟⎟⎞

⎠

⎟⎟⎟⎟⎞

⎦⎥⎥⎥⎥⎥⎥⎤

(14)

It was proposed that the surface potential of nc-Si TFTs is largely affected when the diameter of nc-Si is smaller than 10 nm because the corresponding dielectric constant of nc-Si largely changes with its diameter. At the same time, the surface potential of nc-Si TFTs is little affected by the change in the band gap when the diameter of nc-Si is smaller than 6 nm. This implies that the effects of grain-boundary traps on the surface potential of nc-Si TFTs become more and more important due to the rapid increase of the area of grain-boundary. Thus the change in the surface potential due to the band gap of nc-Si can be neglected, compared to the change caused by grain-boundary traps.

Fig. 2: Comparison of surface potential for an nc-Si TFT [35]

Mao [36] proposed that the threshold voltage in nc-Si TFTs is also strongly depends on the size of silicon grain when the size of silicon grain is less than 20 nm. It was analyzed and proposed that the size of silicon grain impacts on the threshold voltage weakly dependent on the active dopant density and is mainly depends on the change in bandgap and dielectric constant due to the quantum size effects. The threshold voltage or turn-on voltage is defined as the voltage at which strong inversion occurs [37].Strong inversion begins at

휑 ≈ 2휑 ≈ 2 푙푛 (15)

Thus the threshold voltage is given as [36] 푉 =푉 + 2휑 + 푡 ×



푁 + 2휑 + 푛 푘푇 푒푥푝 − 1 + 푙푛

(16) By using the assumption that the q휑 and 퐸 − 퐸 − 푞휑 are much larger than of kT, the threshold voltage can be given as [36]

푉 = 푉 + 2휑 + 푡 × 푁 + 2휑 + 푛 푘푇 푒푥푝 (17)

C. Contact Resistance The nc-Si:H TFTs made by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition have higher carrier mobilities than a-Si:H TFTs. However, the contact resistance limits the effective carrier mobilities as it reduces the voltage drop across the channel of nc-Si TFT and distorts the injected current [38]. Contact resistance from source to drain has been attributed to a number of mechanisms such as current crowding [39], constant parasitic resistance,defects at the contact interface [40] and transport through barrier [41]. Contact resistance has a vital impact on the TFTs transconductance and on the electrical characteristics of the device. Some of the authors [42] determined the total resistance of nc-Si TFT by the following equations

푅 = 2푅 + 2푅 + 푅 푅 = 휌 × 퐿/(푊 × 푡) (18)

RTOT is the total resistance of nc-Si TFT, RC is the contact resistance between source/drain and metal, RS is the resistance of source/drain, RCH is the channel resistance, ρ is the resistivity of nc-Si TFT channel, W, L are the width and length of nc-Si channel and t is the thickness of nc-Si active layer. RS and RCis low. Authors analyzed that if t is increased and grain size is increased. Then, ρ is decreased and causes the reduction of RCH resulting in reduction of RTOT [42]. The reduced RCH can increase the field effect mobility and off-state current. Authors [38] proposed that the omission of contact resistance effects can result in an incorrect extraction of the maximum µFET by a factor of 2. Some other authors [43] measured the total resistance RTOT = VDS/IDS, composed of contact resistance and channel resistance, across the TFTs output terminals. And proposed that the contact resistance R0, composed of ohmic and non-ohmic components, is inversely proportional to channel width W. However the channel resistance, RCH = rCH × (L/W) where L is the channel length and rCH is the channel resistance per L/W, in the linear regime follow a purely ohmicbehaviour. Authors [43] estimated the ohmic contact resistance from the intercept with the Y-axis when RTOT ×W (Y -axis) is plotted versus L (X-axis) and the slope denotes rCH. The results show that the source/drain current at VDS = 10 V becomes limited by the contact resistance when the L is less than 10 μm for n-channel and less than 25 μm for p-channel. Authors also proposed that the contact resistance is strongly depends on the gate voltage VGS.



Other authors [38] estimated the non-ohmic contact resistance using the current dependent polynomial, from which the total voltage drop across the TFT can be calculated

푉 = 퐼 푅 = 퐼 푅 + 푅 + 푅 = 퐼 푅 + 푅 + ∑ 퐴 퐼 (19)

Here, 푉 represent the measured voltage drop, Ais the constant coefficients of a polynomial, IDS

the drain-source current, 푅 the channel resistance and 푅 푎푛푑푅 the ohmic and non-ohmic components, respectively.

Contact resistance can also be due to transport over a barrier with electronic defect states [41].As a gate voltage is applied the defects are filled and the barrier height changes. Authors proposed that for low trap state density the mobility saturates. The combined effect of charge accumulation in the channel and drop in the contact resistance can increase the trapping state density and thus the mobility.

푅 = 푅 .퐸푥푝 (20) VI. CONCLUSION The recent progress in nc-Si:H TFTs has been reviewed in this paper. The different type of materials such as a-Si:H, poly-Si and nc-Si:H which are used as an active layer for the fabrication of thin film transistors and also the various structures and operation of TFTs were discussed in this review paper. In case of bottom-gated nc-Si:H TFT, the device performance is determined by the quality of bottom layers of nc-Si, where the conduction channel is formed whereas in case of top-gated nc-Si:H TFT, the conduction channel will be formed in the highly crystalline part of the nc-Si film. Hence, it is expected that top-gate nc-Si TFTs render better performance than bottom-gate devices. The main limitations of the nc-Si:H TFTs are electrical instability and the drain leakage current. Various physical parameters like temperature, grain size and contact resistance affects the device performance and thus affects the device characteristics. It was also discussed that defect state creation is the dominant mechanism of the shift in threshold voltage. REFERENCES [1] Snell A. J., Mackenzie K. D., Spear W.E., Le Comber P. G. “Application of amorphous silicon field effect transistors in addressable liquid crystal display panels” Applied Physics Letter. 1981, 24: 357-362. [2] Mizukami M., Inukai K., Yamagata H., Konuma T., Nishi T., Koyama J., Yamazaki S., “6-bit Digital VGA OLED”, SID International Symposium Digest Technical Papers, 2000, 31: 912-915. [3] Finkenzeller K. “RFID Handbook: Fundamentals and Applications in Contactless Smart Cards and Identification” 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons. Ltd., West Sussex, England. 2003. [4] Street R. A. “Technology and Applications of Amorphous Silicon” Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, New York. 2000. [5] Easton B. C., Chapman J. A., Hill O. F., Powell M. J. “The plasma-enhanced deposition of hydrogenated amorphous silicon”, Vacuum. 1984, 34: 371-76. [6] Street R. A. “Hydrogenated Amorphous Silicon” Cambridge, New York, USA. 1991, 237-242. [7] Kagan C. R., Andry P. “Thin-Film Transistors” Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, Basel. 2003, 35-43.



[8] Karim. K. S., Pixel Architectures for Digital Imaging Using Amorhpous Silicon Technology [Ph.d thesis], Universitiy of Waterloo, Waterloo, 2002. [9] Rolland A., Richard J., Kleider J. P., Mencaraglia D. “Electrical properties of amorphous silicon transistors and MIS devices: comparative study of top nitride and bottom nitride configuration” Journal of Electrochemical Society. 1993, 140: 3679-3683. [10]Powell M. J., Berkel C. V., Franklin A. R., Deane S. C., Milne W. I. “Defect pool in amorphous-silicon thin film transistors” Physical Review B. 1992, 45: 4160-4170. [11] Gupta N., Tyagi B. P. “An analytical model of the influence of grain size on the mobility and transfer characteristics of polysilicon thin-film transistors (TFTs)” PhysicaScripta. 2005, 71: 225–228. [12] Lih J. J., Sung C. F., Li C. H., Hsiao T. H., Lee H. H. “Comparison of a-Si and poly-Si for AMOLED displays” Journal of the Society for Information Display. 2004, 12: 367-371. [13] Shin K. W., Fabrication and Analysis of Bottom Gate Nanocrystalline Silicon Thin Film Transistors [PhD thesis], University of Waterloo, Canada, 2008. [14] Cheng I. C., Allen S., Wagner S. “Evolution of Nanocrystalline Silicon Thin Film Transistor Channel Layers” Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Amorphous and Microcrystalline Semiconductors, Campos do Jordao, Brazil, 2003, August 24-29, 720-724. [15] Lee C. H., Sazonov A., Nathan A. “High-mobility nanocrystalline silicon thin-film transistors fabricated by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition” Applied Physics Letters. 2005, 86: 222106-1-3. [16] Hatzopoulos A. T., Arpatzanis N., Tassis D. H., Dimitriadis C. A., Templier F., Oudwan M., Kamarinos G. “Effect of channel width on the electrical characteristics of amorphous/nanocrystalline silicon bilayer thin-film transistors” IEEE Transaction on Electron Devices. 2007, 54: 1265-1269. [17] Kasouit S., Cabarrocas P. R. I., Vanderhaghen R., Bonnassieux Y., Elyaakoubi M., French I. D. “Effects of Grain Size and Plasma-Induced Modification of the Dielectric on the Mobility and Stability of Bottom Gate Microcrystalline Silicon TFTs” Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Amorphous and Microcrystalline Semiconductors, Campos do Jordao, Brazil, 2003, August 24-29, 369-373. [18] Kuo Y. “Thin Film Transistors: Materials and Process” 2nd vol., 1st ed., Kluwer Academic, New York, USA, 2004, 120-126. [19] Grant D. J., Physics and Modelling of Nanocrystalline Silicon Thin-Film Transistors [PhD thesis], University of Waterloo, Canada, 2003. [20] Powell M. J., Berkel C. V., Franklin A. R., Deane S.C., and Milne W.I., “Defect pool in amorphous-silicon thin film transistors” Physical Review B. 1992, 454: 4160-70. [21] Stannowski B. and Schropp R. E. I., “Hot-wire amorphous silicon thin film transistors”, Thin Solid Films. 2001, 383: 125-128. [22] Jackson W. B., Marshall J. M., and Moyer M. D., “Role of hydrogen in the formation of metastable defects in hydrogenated amorphous silicon,” Physical Review B. 1989, 39:1164-1179. [23] Powell M. J., Berkel C. V., and Hughes J. R., “Time and temperature dependence of instability mechanisms in amorphous silicon thin-film transistors,” Applied Physics Letters. 1989, 54:1323-1325. [24] Sze. S.M. “Physics of semiconductor devices” 2nd ed. Wiley, New York, 1981. [25] Lee H. J., Sazonov A., Nathan A. “Leakage current mechanisms in top-gate nanocrystalline silicon thin film transistors” Applied Physics Letter. 2008, 92:083509-1-3. [26] Esmaeili-Rad M. R., Sazonov A., Nathan A. “Analysis of the off current in nanocrystalline silicon bottom-gate thin-film transistors” Journal of Applied Physics. 2008, 103: 074502-1-6. [27] Nathan V. and Das N. C., “Gate-induced leakage current in MOS devices” IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, 1993,40:1888–1890.


International Conference on Communication Systems (ICCS-2013) October 18-20, 2013 B K Birla Institute of Engineering & Technology (BKBIET), Pilani, India 6

[28] Hatzopoulos A. T., Arpatzanis N., Tassis D. H., Dimitriadis C.A., Oudwan M., Templier F., and Kamarinos G., “Study of the drain leakage current in bottom-gated nanocrystalline silicon thin-film transistors by conduction and low-frequency noise measurements” IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, 2007, 54:1076-1082. [29] Esmaeili-Rad M. R., Sazonov A., Nathan A. “Absence of defect state creation in nanocrystalline silicon thin film transistors deduced from constant current stress measurements” Applied Physics Letter. 2007, 91: 113511-1-3. [30] Libsch F. R. and Kanicki J., “Bias-stress-induced stretched-exponential time dependence of charge injection and trapping in amorphous thin-film transistors,” Applied Physics Letters. 1993,62: 1286-1288. [31] Bauza M., Ahnood A., Li F. M., Vygranenko Y., Esmaeili-Rad M. R, Chaji G., Sazonov A., Robertson J., Milne W. I., and Nathan A, “Photo-induced instability of Nanocrystalline TFTs” Journal of Display Technology. 2010, 6: 589-591. [32] Mao L. F., “Effect of the size of silicon grain on the gate-leakage current in nanocrystalline silicon thin film transistors” Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B. 2010, 28: 460-465. [33] Wang L. W., Zunger A., "Dielectric constants of silicon quantum dots", Physical Review Leter. 1994, 73:1039-1042. [34] Peng X., Ganti S., Sharma P., Alizadeh A., Nayak S., and Kumar S., “Novel Scaling Laws for Band Gaps of Quantum Dots” Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience. 2005, 2:469–472. [35] Mao L.F., “The quantum size effects on the surface potential of Nanocrystalline silicon thin film transistors” Thin Film Solid. 2010, 518: 3396-3401. [36] Mao L. F, “Quantum size impacts on the threshold voltage in nanocrystalline silicon thin film transistors” Microelectronics Reliability Elsevier, 2013, xx:1-5. [37] Sze S.M., Kwok k. N. “Physics of Semiconductor devices”, 3rd ed. John Wiley, New Jersey, 2007. [38] Ahnood A., Li F., Ghaffarzadeh K., Esmaeili-Rad M. R., Nathan A., Sazonov A., Servati P. “Non-ohmic contact resistance and field-effect mobility in nanocrystalline silicon thin film transistors” Applied Physics Letter. 2008, 93: 163503-1-3. [39] Richards T. J. and Sirringhaus H., “Analysis of the contact resistance in staggered, top-gate organic field-effect transistors,” Journal of Applied Physics, 2007, 102:094510. [40] Street R. A. and Salleo A., “Contact effects in polymer transistors,” Applied Physics Letters, 2002, 81: 2887. [41] Vinciguerra V., Rosa M. L., Nicolosi D., Sicurella G., and Occhipinti L., “Modeling the gate bias dependence of contact resistance in staggered polycrystalline organic thin film transistors,” Organic Electronics, 2009, 10:1074-1081. [42] Kang D. W., Park J. H, Han S. M., and Han M. K. “The Effects of Nanocrystalline Silicon Thin Film Thickness on Top Gate Nanocrystalline Silicon Thin Film Transistor Fabricated at 180°C” Journal of Semiconductor Technology and Science, 2008, 8:111-114. [43] Cheng I. C., Wagner S. and Sauvain E. V. “Contact Resistance in Nanocrystalline Silicon Thin-Film Transistors” IEEE Transaction on Electron Devices.2008, 5:373-377. BIOGRAPHY

Prachi Sharma is currently pursuing PhD from Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology and SciencePilani, Rajasthan, India. She received M-Tech in VLSI Design in 2011 from Banasthali University, Rajasthan and B-Tech in Electronics and Telecommunication in 2009 from UPTU, Lucknow. Her research interests are Semiconductor Device Modelling, VLSI Design, Microelectronics.



Dr. Navneet Gupta obtained M.Sc. (Physics-Electronics) in 1995 from H.N.B Garhwal Central University (HNBGU), Srinagar, India with first rank in the University. He received M.Tech in Materials Technology in 1998 from Indian Institute of Technology (IIT-BHU) (formerly IT-BHU). He did his Ph.D. in the field of Semiconductor Devices in 2005 from HNBGU. Presently, he is Assistant Professor and Convenor-Departmental Research Committee in Electrical and Electronics Engineering Department, Birla Institute of Technology and

Science, Pilani, (BITS-Pilani) Rajasthan, India. He has guided 1 Ph.D. student and is currently guiding 4 Ph.D. candidates. He is on doctoral advisory committee for 6 Ph.D. students. He completed 2 sponsored research projects from UGC and DST. His research interests include Semiconductor Device Modelling, RF-MEMS, Material Selection and Antenna Design. He is life member of several international and national professional bodies. He has over 50 research publications (of which 21 are in reputed peer reviewed international and national journals with good impact factors, and 29 in conference proceedings.). He has published six books in the areas of engineering physics and electronics engineering. He received the Bharat Jyoti Award in 2011 by IIFS, New Delhi, India, DST Young Scientist Award (Fast track Scheme) in Physical Sciences in 2007 and Gold Medal in M.Sc. His biography is included in Marquis Who's Who in World and Marquis Who's Who in Science and Engineering. He is expert reviewer of over 5 International Journals. He reviewed three books of Oxford University Press, Pearson Education and Tata McGraw Hill publishers.

Nanocrystalline silicon thin film transistor (nc si h tf-ts)-a device

Technology

Transcript of Nanocrystalline silicon thin film transistor (nc si h tf-ts)-a device