NAND Flash: Where we are, where are we going?€¦ · NAND Scaling Trend 2D NAND scaling has slowed...
Transcript of NAND Flash: Where we are, where are we going?€¦ · NAND Scaling Trend 2D NAND scaling has slowed...
NAND Flash:Where we are, where are
we going?
Pranav Kalavade
Intel Corporation
Outline
• Introduction
• 3D NAND
• Floating Gate 3D NAND Technology
• CMOS Under Array
• Cell Characteristics
• Summary
NAND Scaling Trend
2D NAND scaling has slowed down
1E-4
1E-3
1E-2
1E-1
1E+0
'00 '05 '10 '15 '20
Cell S
ize [
um
2]
Year
2D NAND Cell Size Scaling
70nm
25nm
20nm
2D NAND Scaling Limiters
• Lithography Limitations
• Small Cell Area Effects: Number Fluctuation
• Proximity Effects: Cell to Cell interference
• High Electric Field Effects
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
5 15 25 35
Vt
dis
trib
uti
on
w
idth
[a
.u.]
Cell feature size [nm]Vt
Ce
lls
Vt distribution width
Outline
• Introduction
• 3D NAND
• Floating Gate 3D NAND Technology
• CMOS Under Array
• Cell Characteristics
• Summary
3D NAND - Scaling Through Stacking
Vertical String vs. Horizontal String
• Vertical string more attractive electrically
• Horizontal string more attractive for cell size
Vertical channel
3D NAND
Horizontal channel
3D NAND
3D NAND Advantage
• Eliminates lithography constraint
• Larger cell size and cell to cell spacing
Less parasitic effects and tighter threshold
voltage distributions
Vt
Cells ~1X nm 2D NAND
3D NAND
3D NAND – Floating Gate vs Charge Trap
• Floating Gate – Good Program/Erase Vt
window and Charge isolation between cells
• Charge Trap – Charge dispersion between
cells & Need for Metal Gate process
Floating Gate 3D NAND Charge Trap 3D NAND
Discrete Charge
Storage Node
Continuous
Charge Storage
Node
Outline
• Introduction
• 3D NAND
• Floating Gate 3D NAND Technology
• CMOS Under Array
• Cell Characteristics
• Summary
3D FG NAND Cell Formation
(b) Cell hole etch
(c) Recess Formation
(d) IPD formation
(e) FG deposition
(f) FG isolation
(g) Tunnel-oxide and
channel formation
(h) WL Step formation for
contacting
(a) Tier deposition
3D FG NAND Technology
CMOS Circuits
Contact/Bitline
Wordlines (32 Active)
SGD
SGS
Metal Layer
Source
Outline
• Introduction
• 3D NAND
• Floating Gate 3D NAND Technology
• CMOS Under Array
• Cell Characteristics
• Summary
CMOS Under Array
• 3D NAND String is formed
fully above the silicon.
• Enables silicon area under
for CMOS circuitry
– 2 Metal Layers below array
for CMOS connections
– 2 Metal layers above the
array for Bitline and
Bussing
Outline
• Introduction
• 3D NAND
• Floating Gate 3D NAND Technology
• CMOS Under Array
• Cell Characteristics
• Summary
Key Cell Characteristics
• Cell Id-Vg Characteristics
• Erase Operation
• Program/Erase Vt
• Program Disturb
• Cell Vt distributions
• Cell to Cell Interference
Cell Id-Vg Characteristics
• Surround gate structure of 3D NAND
provides for good gate control
• 3D NAND String on-current matches that
of 2D NAND
1E-12
1E-10
1E-08
1E-06
0 1 2 3 4 5
Curr
ent
[A]
WL Voltage [V]
Vds = 0.5V
0.0
0.4
0.8
1.2
0 1 2 3 4 5
Curr
ent [
Norm
]
WL Voltage [V]
3D NAND
20nm 2D NAND
Erase Operation
Erase bias applied to the Source
Body biased up by the SGS GIDL
Wo
rdli
nes
N+ Source
SGS1E-14
1E-12
1E-10
1E-08
-6 -4 -2 0GID
L C
urr
en
t [A
]
Vgs [V]Vs
Vg
VWL
Vs =0V
Vbl = -2V
Program/Erase Characteristics
>10V Cell Program/Erase Vt Window is
achieved
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
0 2 4 6 8
Cell
Vt
[V]
Program/Erase Voltage Delta [V]
Program
Erase >10V P/E
Window
Program Disturb
>10V Disturb
Window
Achieved -2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
10 20 30
Cell
Vt
[V]
Gate Voltage [V]
Sel Cell
Inh Cell
>10V
Larger physical
cell size of 3D
NAND improves
Vt distributions
90nm70nm
50nm34nm
25nm
20nm
3D NAND
1
4
16
64
# o
f E
lec/1
00m
V D
Vt
Technology Node
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Natural VtDistribution
Numberfluctuation
Arb
itra
ry U
nit
s 2D 20nm
3D
90nm70nm
50nm
34nm
25nm20nm
3D
1E+2
1E+3
1E+4
# C
ha
nn
el A
rea
Technology Node
Vt Distributions
Cell to Cell Interference
Better shielding from
the control gate in the
3D NAND reduces
interference by ~80%
3D NAND
e e
eee
e
e
e
e
e
2D NAND
e e e e
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1 2
Net Interference (A.U.)
2D 20nm 3D
MLC Vt Distribution Width
• Better intrinsic distribution and lower
interference leads to an overall
tighter Vt distribution for 3D NAND
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
5 15 25 35
Vt
dis
trib
uti
on
w
idth
[a
.u.]
Eff Cell feature size [nm]
2D 20nm3D
Vt Distribution [A.U.]
Nu
mb
er
of
Cells
0.5X3D NAND
Outline
• Introduction
• 3D NAND
• Floating Gate 3D NAND Technology
• Cell Characteristics
• CMOS Under Array
• Summary
SLC MLC TLC QLC?MLC: 4 Levels => 2 bit/cellSLC: 2 Levels => 1 bit/cell
Vt
1 0
RD
PVEV0 Vpass_R
Vt
11 1001 00
R1 R2 R3
EV PV1 PV2 PV3
0
Vt
R1
EV PV1Vpass_R
PV2 PV3 PV4 PV5 PV6 PV7
R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7
TLC: 8 Levels => 3 bit/cell
Vt
R1
EVVpass_
PV1PV2PV3PV4PV5PV6PV7
R4R5 R6 R7
QLC: 16 Levels => 4 bit/cell
PV1PV2PV3PV4PV5PV6PV7PV7
Outline
• Introduction
• 3D NAND
• Floating Gate 3D NAND Technology
• Cell Characteristics
• CMOS Under Array
• Summary
Summary
• 3D NAND extends NAND scaling with cell
characteristics superior to that of scaled
2D NAND
• More bits / cell accelerates the scaling:
facilitated by superior characteristics of
3D NAND