Myth Busters Sorting Fact from Fiction in Texas Public Education

21
Myth Busters Sorting Fact from Fiction in Texas Public Education Presenter Name Presenter Title Presenter’s Organization

description

Myth Busters Sorting Fact from Fiction in Texas Public Education. Presenter Name Presenter Title Presenter’s Organization. Overview. “We must shrink government.” “ Public schools are wasteful/inefficient .” - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Myth Busters Sorting Fact from Fiction in Texas Public Education

Page 1: Myth Busters Sorting Fact from Fiction in Texas Public Education

Myth BustersSorting Fact from Fiction in

Texas Public Education

Presenter NamePresenter Title

Presenter’s Organization

Page 2: Myth Busters Sorting Fact from Fiction in Texas Public Education

Overview

• “We must shrink government.”

• “Public schools are wasteful/inefficient.”• “The legislature put more money into to

public education last session than ever before.”

It’s time for us to combat those myths!

Page 3: Myth Busters Sorting Fact from Fiction in Texas Public Education

Agenda

1. Examine the recurring attacks on public schools.

2. Debunk the myths with “the facts.”

3. Assist you in becoming effective advocates for your public schools.

Page 4: Myth Busters Sorting Fact from Fiction in Texas Public Education

“Districts have a Bloated Administration!”

Critics claim: • 1:1 ratio of administrators to teachers• 1:1 ratio of non-teaching staff to teachers• Schools can avoid cutting teachers

This implies:• Schools are stocked with do-nothing staff; • Non-instructional staff provide no benefit to

student learning;• Schools are mismanaging public funds by cutting

teachers rather than administrators/non-teachers.

Page 5: Myth Busters Sorting Fact from Fiction in Texas Public Education
Page 6: Myth Busters Sorting Fact from Fiction in Texas Public Education

District Administration – The Facts

• During the 2010-11 school year, schools employed 334,900 teachers vs.:

– 6,800 central administrators (1:49 administrator to teacher ratio– 25,600 central and school administrators (1:13

administrators to teachers)

•Statewide, central administration costs $1.3 billion/year vs. $2.7 billion/year state funding cut

•1:1 teacher/non-teacher ratio is true, but lacks context

• Sources: Statewide Academic Excellence Indicator System (TEA)

• School District Staffing Brief (gr.tasb.org)

Page 7: Myth Busters Sorting Fact from Fiction in Texas Public Education

“Superintendent Salaries Are Outrageous”

Critics claim: • More than 200 superintendents make

more money than the Governor

• Superintendent salaries are outrageous

This implies:

• School trustees are fiscally irresponsible• Texas superintendents are taking

taxpayers to the cleaners

Page 8: Myth Busters Sorting Fact from Fiction in Texas Public Education
Page 9: Myth Busters Sorting Fact from Fiction in Texas Public Education

Superintendent Salaries – The Facts

2011-12 Superintendent Salaries (Texas) • Average supt. salary in Texas = $123,000• Median Texas supt. Salary = $107,000

Who else makes more than the Governor?• Four of the Governor’s own staff• 392 individuals on the State of Texas payroll,

including the Education Commissioner Robert Scott.

Superintendent Salaries (Comparable States) California ($158,000) New York ($163,000) Nation ($160,000).

Governor’s non-salary benefits are significant Sources: Texas Tribune Superintendent Salary database

TASB’s Superintendent Salary Survey, 2011-12

Page 10: Myth Busters Sorting Fact from Fiction in Texas Public Education

“Charter Schools Are Better and Cheaper”

Critics claim:• Open-enrollment charter schools

operate more cost-effectively than traditional public schools

• Charter schools academically outperform traditional schools

This implies:• The legislature would get “a bigger

bang for the buck” by expanding charter schools (and spending less on traditional schools)

Page 11: Myth Busters Sorting Fact from Fiction in Texas Public Education
Page 12: Myth Busters Sorting Fact from Fiction in Texas Public Education

Charter Schools – The Facts

• For the 2009-10 school year:– Traditional public schools were allotted on average

$5,708 in M&O revenue per weighted students– Charters received $5,746 $5,746 > $5,708– Charters spend more on administration and less on

“instruction” than do traditional schools

• Accountability Ratings (2009)% of type of school by Accreditation

School Districts

Charter Operators

District Campuses

Charter Schools

Recognized or higher

73.5% 43.5% 70.4% 40.1%

Academically Acceptable

25.0% 40.6% 20.9% 47.16%

Academically Unacceptable

1.6% 11.1% 0.9% 5.8%

Page 13: Myth Busters Sorting Fact from Fiction in Texas Public Education

“Public Education Got More State Funding Than Last

Biennium”Critics claim:• The legislature appropriated $1.6 B more for

public schools this biennium than last bienniumOR• The legislature appropriated $3B more for public

schools this biennium than last biennium

• This implies:• School boards and administrators don’t need

more money, they just want it!

• Programs are being cut, teachers fired, and class sizes are growing just to scare district taxpayers

Page 14: Myth Busters Sorting Fact from Fiction in Texas Public Education
Page 15: Myth Busters Sorting Fact from Fiction in Texas Public Education

Public Education Funding – The FactsPart 1

• Disputing the $1.6B. claim: • 2009 – legislature used $3.4B. in one-time federal funds

to fund public education• 2011 – loss of federal funds left $3.4B. budget hole for

this biennium; so, legislature added $1.6B. more in state funds, leaving a budget hole of $1.8 B; and

• 2011 – legislature failed to pay for enrollment growth ($2.2B) over this biennium

• Disputing the $3B. claim: • Legislature added $3 B. more state funding than last biennium state in Article III BUT • Simultaneously reduced funding for

public ed in Article IX by $3.1 B

Source: Summary of Conference CommitteeOn HB1 (Legislative Budget Board)

Page 16: Myth Busters Sorting Fact from Fiction in Texas Public Education

“Total appropriations for the Foundation School Program (FSP) are estimated to be $4.0 billion …below the amount required to fund the school finance program.”

“General Revenue Funds outside of the FSP are reduced by $1.4 billion, or 52.8 percent compared to the 2010-11 biennium.” --- Legislative Budget Board

“Of the $50.8 billion in all funds, $47 billion is appropriated to TEA, a $4.4 billion decrease from fiscal 2010-11 appropriations. The budget appropriates $35.5 billion in all funds to the Foundation School Program, a decrease of $1 billion from fiscal 2010-11 spending.”

--- House Research Organization

Public Education Funding – The FactsPart 2

Page 17: Myth Busters Sorting Fact from Fiction in Texas Public Education

“Districts Are Shortchanging Their Students”

Critics claim:• Instructional Costs account for less than

half of school spending• “School districts are shortchanging their

students to support 19th century organizational bureaucracies”

• This implies:• Waste, waste, waste…• It’s no wonder that academic performance

isn’t on the rise when schools spend less then half of their budget on the classroom

Page 18: Myth Busters Sorting Fact from Fiction in Texas Public Education
Page 19: Myth Busters Sorting Fact from Fiction in Texas Public Education

Instructional Spending – The Facts

According to the 2010-11 AEIS, Districts spend:

• 58.4% of their operating budget on “Instruction”

• 4.5% of their operating budget on “Student

Support”

• 3.6% on “Instructional-Related Services”

• 10.4% on Maintenance and operations

• 5.2 % on Food Service

• 2.7% on Student Transportation

• 3.1% on Central Administration

• 5.5% on School Leadership

Source: Statewide Academic Excellence Indicator System (TEA)

Page 20: Myth Busters Sorting Fact from Fiction in Texas Public Education

Instructional Spending – The FactsTest Scores have improved dramatically: % of all students, by grade, that met standards – All Tests (TAKS):

Texas high schools ranked in the first two places in Newsweek’s annual rankingsTexas had 15 high schools in top 100; only New York

had more (16)Sources: State Academic Excellence Indicator System, 2002-3 & 2010-11

Newsweek, “America’s Best High Schools,” June, 2011

Grade 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11

2002-03

85% 76% 66% 75% 68% 70% 53% 50%

2010-11

83% 78% 76% 76% 75% 69% 65% 84%

Page 21: Myth Busters Sorting Fact from Fiction in Texas Public Education

Let’s Discuss!

• Combat the myths: tell your community the facts about your district and schools

• Resources :WWW.TRUTHABOUTSCHOOLS.ORG

• Stump the Chump– Heard something about your schools that

doesn’t sound quite true? Ask me.