“My Town, My River Renovation Project”: The Case of Kitakyushu, Japan by Mr. Yasuyuki Fukunaga
-
Upload
adbwaterforall -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
0
Transcript of “My Town, My River Renovation Project”: The Case of Kitakyushu, Japan by Mr. Yasuyuki Fukunaga
7/29/2019 “My Town, My River Renovation Project”: The Case of Kitakyushu, Japan by Mr. Yasuyuki Fukunaga
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/my-town-my-river-renovation-project-the-case-of-kitakyushu-japan-by 1/6
“ ”
“ ”
ADB Conference on Promoting Innovations in Wastewater Management
City of Kitakyushu’s Experience on
City of Kitakyushu’s Experience on astewater
anagement
astewater
anagement
29 J an 2013
Yasuyuki Fukunaga
Director, Water and Sewer Bureau, City of Kitakyushu
7/29/2019 “My Town, My River Renovation Project”: The Case of Kitakyushu, Japan by Mr. Yasuyuki Fukunaga
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/my-town-my-river-renovation-project-the-case-of-kitakyushu-japan-by 2/6
Dokai
Overview of Kitakyushu
Basic Data
・ Area: 488km2
・Population: 975,000
・ Ave. Temperature: 16ºC
Kitakyushu
Airport
ay
・ Ave. Rainfall: 1,600mm/y
・GDP: 3.5 trillion yen
Murasakigawa
river ◆Kitak ushu is a reen cit that has
overcome severe pollution1960s Present
P1
7/29/2019 “My Town, My River Renovation Project”: The Case of Kitakyushu, Japan by Mr. Yasuyuki Fukunaga
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/my-town-my-river-renovation-project-the-case-of-kitakyushu-japan-by 3/6
Kitakyushu’s Approach
deteriorating environment
・ Study of surrounding environment・ -
・ Littering bans, others…
The power of citizens stimulated actions from
(1) Improvements through sewerage construction
rocurng an guaran eeng nanc a resources(3) Removal of barracks and relocation of residents
(4) Comprehensive city development plan
Kitakyushu’s mayor
participated in cleaning
(5) Public awareness campaigns
Etc.P2
7/29/2019 “My Town, My River Renovation Project”: The Case of Kitakyushu, Japan by Mr. Yasuyuki Fukunaga
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/my-town-my-river-renovation-project-the-case-of-kitakyushu-japan-by 4/6
Kitakyushu’s Technology Options
op on o e com ne sewer sys em a e n a s age
(2) Decision on optimum planning areas
(3) Adoption of small-scale sewerage facilities in rural areas(4) Creation of an energy circulating system
(5) Improvement of the combined sewer system as the next step
Shinmachi STPHiagari STPKitaminato STP
Main sewerage facilities
・Sewage Treatment Plants: 5
3 ,
・Pumping Stations: 34
・Pipes: 4,394km
浄化センター現況能力:621,000m3/日 Sone STPKogasaki STP
P3
Achieved 99.8% of population
connected to the sewerage system(Mar. 2006)
7/29/2019 “My Town, My River Renovation Project”: The Case of Kitakyushu, Japan by Mr. Yasuyuki Fukunaga
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/my-town-my-river-renovation-project-the-case-of-kitakyushu-japan-by 5/6
Procuring and Guaranteeing Financial Resources
◆ Pro er cost-sharin between national overnment and local residents
Basic project with national government subsidy
Project covered by the local budget only
■ Local bonds (65%)■ National government subsidy (26%)National
300
350
単位:億円
一般会計出資金 その他35
Billion JPY
30
■ Transfer from general account (6%)
Local
government
subsidy
(5/10)
150
200
25025
20
15
Local
bonds
(9.5/10)
50
10010
5
on s(4.5/10)
0S38 S41 S44 S47 S50 S53 S56 S59 S62 H2 H5 H8 H11 H14 H17 H201963 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
0
Kitakyushu’s caseJapanese standard (for pipes)
Beneficiary users charge,
etc.P4
7/29/2019 “My Town, My River Renovation Project”: The Case of Kitakyushu, Japan by Mr. Yasuyuki Fukunaga
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/my-town-my-river-renovation-project-the-case-of-kitakyushu-japan-by 6/6
[Situation in 1968]
Removal of Barracks and Relocation of Residents
・ ~ , peope vng n arrac s
・Untreated wastewater directly fed into river
◆Relocation of residents and removal of barracksconsidered to be a factor in environmental deterioration
●Formation of an organization to devise environmental pollution countermeasures
●Formation/implementation of an overall plan for removal/relocation
・Construction of public housing
・Workplace and land mediation
[Present Situation]
20
30
40
50
B O D ( m g / l )
30
40
50
60
70
8090
w e r a g e s a t u r a t i o n ( % )
Average B O D (m g/l)(Katsuyam a Bridge)Average B O D (m g/l)(Tanga B ridge)Sew erage saturation level(%)
P5
0
10
1 9 6 4
1 9 6 7
1 9 7 0
1 9 7 3
1 9 7 6
1 9 7 9
1 9 8 2
1 9 8 5
1 9 8 8
1 9 9 1
1 9 9 4
1 9 9 7
2 0 0 0
2 0 0 3
2 0 0 6
2 0 0 9
Fiscal Year
0
10
20 S