Music influence on brand perception. Survey of the commercials' communicative efficiency

12

Click here to load reader

Transcript of Music influence on brand perception. Survey of the commercials' communicative efficiency

Page 1: Music influence on brand perception. Survey of the commercials' communicative efficiency

1

Music  Influence  on  Brand  Perception:  Survey  of  the  Commercials’  Communicative  Efficiency  

Author  

Yulia  Malenkaya,  general  director  in  Sound  ID  Audiobranding  

Key  words  

1. Communicative  efficiency  2. Brand  attributes  3. Commercial  4. Survey  5. Music  

 

Abstract  

Music  plays  a  pervasive  role   in  consumers’   lives  and  is  often  used  in  marketing   communication.   As   a   powerful  mean   of  mood   creation   and  communication   of   feelings   and   emotions,   music   appears   to   be   an  important  component  of  audio  support  in  commercials.    

This   paper   explores   the   influence   of   music   on   the   efficiency   of  commercials.   For   this   purpose   a   survey   of   6   video-­‐spots   was   conducted.  Selected   ad   videos   included   3   videos   with   music,   consciously   chosen  according   to   the   key   brand   attributes,   and   3   videos   in   which   music   is  chosen  without  regard   to   the   image  of  brand.  Selected  commercials  were  shown  to  the  sample  of  83  respondents,  who  filled   in  questionnaires  after  the  overview.  The  survey’s  results  indicate  that  music  may  have  significant  impact  on  audience  perception  of  the  brands:  commercials  with  conscious  music  choice  gave  a  much  clearer  idea  of  brands  to  the  respondents,  than  the  ones  with  unconscious  choice  of  music.    

Page 2: Music influence on brand perception. Survey of the commercials' communicative efficiency

2

Advertisers   spend   large   sums   of   money   on   the   production   of  music  for  the  ads.  Creative  fees  for  an  original  composition  can  be  one  of  the   largest  expense  items,  whereas  the  rights  to  popular  songs  can  cost  much  more.  Music  costs  can  add    hundreds  of  thousands  of  dollars  to  the  ad   budget.   For   example,   Nike   spent   $500  000   on   the   rights   to   use   The  Beatles'  song  "Revolution"  (Cocks,  1987).    

Companies  are  risking  millions  of  dollars  on  the  belief  that  music  can  boost  ads’  efficiency,  yet  there  is  no  universally  accepted  explanation  of  how  this  works.  The  theory  of  audiobranding  is  developing  intensively  nowadays,   meanwhile   the   issue   of   semiotic   qualities   of   music   and   its  potential  for  branding  is  not  enlightened  enough  in  marketing  literature.        

 There  are  some  investigations,  which  have  suggested  that  music  

influences   listeners   mainly   through   their   feelings   and   moods   (Gorn,  1982;   Bruner   1990).   Although   most   of   the   research   is   focused   on  emotional  responses   to  ad  music,   it   is  also   important   to  bear   in  mind  a  pervasive   idea   that   music   is   in   some   way   capable   of   symbolizing  emotions,   images   or   ideas.   This   idea   lead   to   the   development   of  music  semiotics   in   70s   and   80s,   but   still   didn’t   find   ist   place   in   the   theory   of  marketing  communications  and  branding.        

Taking  all  this  into  account,  the  general  intent  of  this  essay  is  to  explore   the  potential   of  music   communication   and   ist   impact   on  brand  perception.   For   this   purpose   a   research   focused   on   the   dependence   of  the  commercials’  efficiency  from  music  choice  was  conducted.    

1. Methodology  of  research  1.1  Procedure  

The  study  refers  to  the  primary  empirical  quantitative  research.  It  was  carried  out  in  January  2010  by  a  survey  of  respondents,  based  on  the  questionnaires  sent  by  e-­‐mail.  The  aim  of  the  research  is  to  define  the  impact  of  music,  chosen  for  the  ad  according  to  the  key  brand  attributes,  on  the  perception  of  brand,  promoted  in  this  commercial.  The  ability  to  create   a   brand   image   and   communicate   it’s   key   features   refers   to   the  communicative   efficiency   of   the   ad.   The   notion   of   commercial’s  communicative  efficiency   implies   the  change   in   the  viewer’s  perception  of   the  brand  and  usually  discussed  together  with  economical  efficiency,  which  stands  for  increase  in  sales  volume,  growth  of  the  demand  for  the  

Page 3: Music influence on brand perception. Survey of the commercials' communicative efficiency

3

product   and   other   economically   significant   results.   In   contrast   to  economical   efficiency,   the   level   of   achieved   communicative   efficiency  can’t   be   calculated.   It   is   defined   by   feedback   from   the   viewers   and  interpreted   through   such   constructs   as   perception.   feelings,   emotions,  attention,  memory  and  motivation  (Кутлалиев  &  Попов,  2005).  

As  the  conceptual  definition  of  communicative  efficiency  is  quiet  abstract.  broad  and  difficult   to  evaluate,   in   this  particular   research   it   is  interpreted  according  to  the  number  of  key  brand  attributes,  recognized  by   the   viewers.   The   questions   in   the   form   are   closed,   as   they   provide  several   answers   to   choose.   Among   the   answers   there   are   both   correct  key   brands’   attributes   i.e.   laid   by   the   owners   of   brand,   and   incorrect  ones,  intentionally  contrived  for  the  survey.  Since  the  observed  situation  has   two   possible   outcomes   (either   the   respondent   selects   the   correct  attribute   of   the   brand   or   not),   the   information   obtained   through   the  survey  refers  to  a  nominal   level  of  measurement,  and  the  questions  are  alternate  (dichotomous).       According  to  the  aims  of   the  research,  2  alternative  hypotheses  were  formulated:    H0:  use  of  music,   selected   for   the  commercial  according   to   the  key  attributes  of  brand,  promoted  in  this  commercial,  doesn’t  facilitate  brand  identification,  its  memorability  and  generation  of  the  correct  associations  among  the  viewers.      H1:  use  of  music,   selected   for   the  commercial  according   to   the  key  attributes  of  brand,  promoted  in  this  commercial,   facilitates  brand  identification,   its   memorability   and   generation   of   the   correct  associations  among  the  viewers.      

To   test   these   hypotheses,   six   video-­‐spots   were   selected:   three  commercials   supported   by   the   music,   which,   on   the   author’s   opinion,  matches  the  key  attributes  of  brand  (further  these  3  commercials  will  be  stated  as  commercials  with  consciously  chosen  music):    

Brand  &  commercial  title   Music   Reference  to  the  video  Chanel  Coco  Mademoiselle   Joss  Stone  -­‐  «Love»   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aibOY18P

kgo  

Page 4: Music influence on brand perception. Survey of the commercials' communicative efficiency

4

Nike  (Nike  Courage)   The  Killers  -­‐  «I  got  a  soul  but  I’m  not  a  soldier»  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHTPoQbYPCE  

Miller  (In  Miller  way)   FatBoy  Slim  -­‐  «Wonderful  Night»  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FxtoR8dltA  

Table  1.  Commercials  with  consciously  chosen  music    and   three   commercials   supported  by   the  music,  which,   on   the   author’s  opinion,  doesn’t  match  the  key  attributes  of  brand:    

Brand  &  commercial  title  

Music   Reference  to  the  video  

Sberbank Music by A. Ribnikov, lyrics by I. Kohanovsky, “Я тебе конечно верю” [Of course I believe you]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gwhUYdJuAI&feature=youtube_gdata

Megafon (Music expert)

Music,  composed  for  the  commercial   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kBIRaw5Jix4  

Pyaterochka (the nearest low prices)

Music, composed for the commercial http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJh-KzS0t88&feature=related

Table    2.  Commercials  with  unconsciously  chosen  music    

The   choice   of   commercials   was   motivated   by   one   factor:  connection   between   semiotics   of   music   and   brand   identity.   Decision  about  the  occurrence  of  this  connection  in  the  commercials  was  made  by  following  2-­‐steps  procedure:    

1. official  sites  of  chosen  brands  were  scanned  for  information  about  brand  attributes  correlating  with  elements  of  Aaker’s  Brand  Identity  Model  (Aaker,  1995).  After  this,  key  identity  elements  were   structured   in   a   table   (see   the   appendix  №1  «Key  brand  attributes»).  

2. music,  used  in  the  video-­‐spots  was  considered  according  to  the  Model   of  Musical   Competence   (Stefani,   2000),   in   order  to   formulate   its   main   socio-­‐cultural   aspects:   genre,   style,  audience,  national  and  sub  cultural  belonging,   image  of   the  musician/group/singer,  and  so  on.  

The  conclusion  on  whether  music  matches  the  brand  identity  or  not,  was  made  after  these  two  analyses.  

On   the   base   of   Brand   Identity   Models   key   attributes   of   the  brands   were   determined   (see   the   appendix   №2   «  Key  Brand  Attributes»)   and   further   included   in   the   answers   options   in  

Page 5: Music influence on brand perception. Survey of the commercials' communicative efficiency

5

questionnaires   along  with  wrong   options,   created   intentionally   for   the  survey.    

The  procedure  of  survey  consisted  of  two  stages:  first  -­‐  watching  video-­‐spots  and  then  filling  the  form  in.  After  that,  the  respondents  sent  the  filled  forms  to  the  e-­‐mail,  mentioned  in  the  questionnaires.      1.2  Sample  

The   universal   set   for   the   survey   was   determined   according   to  following  operational  factors:  

• Demographic  component:  o age  of  respondents:  from  18  to  50  years  old  o gender:  doesn’t  matter  o income:  doesn’t  matter  

• Geographic  component:  Saint-­‐Petersburg  (including  the  suburbs  of  the  city)    

Initial   sample   constituted   100   respondents.   16   respondents  refused  to  participate  in  the  survey  during  the  process  of  data  collection  and  1  respondent  filled  in  the  form  in  an  incorrect  way.  As  a  result,   the  actual  sample  constituted  83  respondents.    

The   sample   of   respondents   for   the   survey   refers   to   a   non-­‐random  sample  type,  since  it  consists  mainly  of  the  students  of  Graduate  School   of   Management   –   department   of   Saint-­‐Petersburg   State  University.   This   is   a   constraining   factor,  which  has   a   certain   impact   on  the   results   of   the   research.   The   constraints   will   be   discussed   in   more  detail  further,  in  the  section  “Constraints  of  the  research”  

2.  Results  2.1  Analyses  

After   the   collection   of   survey’s   data   it   was   organized   into   the  

EXCEL   table   (see   the   attached   EXCEL   file   «Survey   data»).     Further  

analyses  consisted  of  calculation  of  following  rates:  

-­‐   frequency   distribution   of   correctly   recognised   atrributes   (for  

each  brand  attribute)  

-­‐  percentage  distribution  of  correctly  recognised  atrributes  (for  

each  brand  attribute)  

Page 6: Music influence on brand perception. Survey of the commercials' communicative efficiency

6

-­‐  average  values  of  correct  responses  (for  each  of  two  groups  of  

commercials:   commercials   with   consciously   chosen   music   and  

commerciald  with  unconsciously  chosen  music)  

Tables  with  results  for  each  brand  are  stated  below:  

Table  3.  Survey  results  for  Chanel  Coco  Mademoiselle  brand    

Table  4.  Survey  results  for  Nike  brand    

Brand  attribute     Number  of  respondents,  correctly  recognised  the  

attribute      

Percentage  of  respondents  correctly  recognised  the  attribute    

(%)  (data  is  approximated  to  whole  numbers)  

Feminity   59   71  Romanticism   65   78  

Discreet  luxury   61   74  Elegance  in  simplicity   71   86  

Charm  and  independence   68   82  Grace  of  aroma   61   74  

Brand  attribute     Number  of  respondents,  correctly  recognised  the  

attribute      

Percentage  of  respondents  correctly  recognised  the  attribute    

(%)  (data  is  approximated  to  whole  numbers)  

Desire  to  win   74   89  Determination  to  strive   57   69  

Overcoming  yourself   52   63  Commitment  and  perseverance  

51   62  

Striving  fort  success  and  superioriy  

41   49  

Enthusiasm   40   48  

Brand  attribute     Number  of  respondents,  

correctly  recognised  the  attribute    

 

Percentage  of  respondents  correctly  recognised  the  attribute    

(%)  (data  is  approximated  to  whole  numbers)  

Clubbing   68   82  Outstanding  events     48   58  

Change  in  everyday  city  life   53   64  Fresh  emotions   43   52  

Page 7: Music influence on brand perception. Survey of the commercials' communicative efficiency

7

Table  5.  Survey  results  for  Miller  brand      

Table  6.  Survey  results  for  Seberbank  brand  

Table  7. Survey  results  for  MegaFon  brand  

Stylish  clubs  &  parties   71   86  Target  audience:  young  people  from  18  to  30  years  old,  income  –  average  

and  higher  

69   83  

Brand  attribute     Number  of  respondents,  

correctly  recognised  the  attribute    

 

Percentage  of  respondents  correctly  recognised  the  attribute    

(%)  (data  is  approximated  to  whole  numbers)  

Security   24   29  Lidership   25   30  

Responsibility  &  stability   23   28  International  authority   10   12  

Fast  service   20   24  Resistance  to  crisis     41   49  

Brand  attribute     Number  of  respondents,  

correctly  recognised  the  attribute    

 

Percentage  of  respondents  correctly  recognised  the  attribute    

(%)  (data  is  approximated  to  whole  numbers)  

High  quality  service   20   24  Available  prices   13   16  

Reliability   28   34  Convinience   21   25  

Wide  range  of  services   38   46  Unified  standards  of  service   17   21  

Brand  attribute     Number  of  respondents,  

correctly  recognised  the  attribute    

 

Percentage  of  respondents  correctly  recognised  the  attribute    

(%)  (data  is  approximated  to  whole  numbers)  

Quality   3   4  Economy   63   76  

Respect  for  Russian  traditions   31   37  

Page 8: Music influence on brand perception. Survey of the commercials' communicative efficiency

8

Table  8.  Survey  results  for  Pyaterochka  brand  

Average  number  of  recognized  attributes  is  28,2 for  the  commercials  with  conscious  choice  of  music.  For  the  commercials  with  unconscious  choice  of  music  this  rate  is  much  lower  and  constitutes  58,4.    

Six  attributes  from  the  block  of  brands,  promoted  in  commercials  with  conscious  choice  of  music  achieved  more  than  80%  recognition  (marked  in  green),  whereas  from  block  of  brands,  promoted  in  commercials  with  unconscious  choice  of  music,  only  one  attribute  exceeded  80%  recognition  rate.    

 One  more  observation:  sixteen  attributes  from  the  block  of  

brands,  promoted  in  commercials  with  conscious  choice  of  music  achieved  more  than  50%  recognition,  whereas  from  block  of  brands,  promoted  in  commercials  with  unconscious  choice  of  music,  only  two  attribute  exceeded  50%  recognition  rate.    

 All  in  all,  the  level  of  response  for  the  first  block  of  brands  is  

quiet  high  and  therefore  testifies  to  the  high  level  of  communicative  efficiency  of  the  commercials,  in  which  music  was  selected  according  to  the  key  attributes  of  brands.  The  information,  which  was  supposed  to  be  perceived  by  the  viewers,  was  actually  perceived.  The  communicative  efficiency  of  commercials  from  second  block  was  much  lower  –  it  could  be  seen  from  the  rates.  

 These  rates  show  a  considerable  excess  in  recognised  attributes  

of  brands,  which  were  promoted  in  the  commercials  with  conscious  choice  of  music.  On  the  base  of  this,  it  could  be  concluded,  that  the  collected  data  is  statistically  significant,  which  means  that  the  communicative  efficiency  of  the  commercials  and  perception  of  brands  in  particular,  could  be  enhanced  via  music.  Therefore  the  H0  hypotheses  is  rejected,  while  H0  hypotheses  is  true:  

 Use  of  music,  selected  for  the  commercial  according  to  the  key  attributes  of  brand,  promoted  in  this  commercial,  facilitates  brand  identification,  its  memorability  and  generation  of  the  correct  associations  among  the  viewers.  

 

However,  the  constraints  of  the  research,  conditioned  mainly  by  the  non-­‐random  sample  type,  doesn’t  allow  to  consider  this  with  full  confidence.      

National  belonging   29   35  Walking  distance  locations   35   42  

Low  prices   67   81  

Page 9: Music influence on brand perception. Survey of the commercials' communicative efficiency

9

2.2  Constraints  of  the  research  

 Interpreting  the  results  of  the  study,  it  is  necessary  to  take  into  account  

multiple  constraints  and  assumptions  underlying  the  design  of  the  study.  

First  of  all,  it  is  very  difficult  to  evaluate  the  impact  of  music  on  the  

viewers’  perception  of  brands  singly,    since  the  audience  perception  of  a  

brand  is  a  result  of  all  the  synergic  factors,  created  by  the  commercial.  

Secondly,  even  though  the  respondents  were  asked  to  base  their  

answers  solely  on  the  commercials,  selected  for  the  study,  their  

responses  are  also  influenced  to  some  extent  by  the  previous,  already  

existed  image  of  the  brands,  which  was  formed  by  all  the  marketing  

communications  of  these  brands  that  they  have  ever  received.    

Another,  and  by  far  the  most  significant  constraint  is  the  fact  

that  most  of  the  participants  in  the  study  sample  (approximately  80%  of  

the  total  number)  are  students  of  one  department.  It  means  that  they  

may  have  a  sort  of  similarities  in  some  aspects.  The  main  consequence  of  

this  constraint  is  the  fact  that  the  results  of  the  study  can  not  be  

extrapolated  to  the  universal  set,  as  they  are  not  representative.    

 

3.  Discussion  and  Conclusion  

We examined the proposition that music may have significant

impact on brand perception. Investigation of six commercials, selected

according to the choice of music used in it demonstrated that this proposition

receives fairly consistent empirical support. The interaction between music

semiotics and brand identity enhance the communicative efficiency of the

commercial, providing the viewer with a clear idea of the brand. The level of

brand recognition is higher in those cases, when the commercials are

supported by music, selected according to the key brand attributes.

Although  the  results  of  the  study  were  statistically  significant,  

they  are  not  representative  and  couldn’t  be  extrapolated  to  the  universal  

set,  because  of  limitations  of  the  research.  The  main  constraint  that

should be addressed in further research is the following – the sample was

Page 10: Music influence on brand perception. Survey of the commercials' communicative efficiency

10

mainly limited to one population group— university students. Though this

group was an appropriate target audience for the survey, their belonging to

the same generation and to the community of one department may affect the

way they respond to all the elements of broadcast commercials.

 But,   nevertheless,   the   value   of   this   study   is   undeniable:   such  

kind  of  a  cheap  and  relatively  simple  research  can  be  a  useful  practice  for  

the   brand   owners   and   advertisers.   The   developed   procedure   and  

methodology  of  study  can  become  an  easy  way  to  check  the  efficiency  of  

commercial,   in   respect   to   brand   recognition,   securing   against   money  

waste  for  the  use  of  unfit  music.    

This  study  may  help  as  well,  to  explain  some  of  the  conflicting  

findings  reported  in  previous  research  on  the  relationship  between  

background  music  and  marketing  effectiveness  of  the  advertisement  

(Bruner  &  Gordon,  1990).  

Moreover, the main outcomes of the research pose some forward-

looking questions, which appear to be perspective for further research. First

of all, it applies to the issue of market segments and categories of goods or

services, for advertising of which music becomes an important mean of

communication. It could be assumed, that since music enhances the

communicative efficiency of the ad, it is more relevant for the ads which has

first of all an emotional, not cognitive appeal and are aimed at emotional

perception, not the rational one. If so, music appears to be more valuable and

significant element of communication for luxury brands, which satisfy

emotional needs or need less rational motives to be bought (for example, a

high-end fashion brand), than for the goods, positioned as economical,

money-saving offers (for example, economical packs of corn-flakes,) or

imply a multicriteria process of buying decision (for example, garden

machinery). This assumption offers an important area for continued research.  

 

Page 11: Music influence on brand perception. Survey of the commercials' communicative efficiency

11

References     Aaker,   D.   (1996),   Building   Strong   Brands,   the   University   of   Michigan:  

Free  Press    Bruner,   Gordon   C.,   III   (1990),   Music,   Mood,   and   Marketing,   Journal   of  

Marketing,  vol.  54,  issue  4  ,  pp.  94-­‐104.    Cocks,  J.  (1987),  Wanna  Buy  a  Revolution?,  Time  (May  18),  p.  78.    Gorn,  G.  J.  (1982),  The  Effects  of  Music  in  Advertising  on  Choice  

Behavior:  A  Classical  Conditioning  Approach,  Journal  of  Marketing,  vol.  46,  pp.  94-­‐101.  

 Stefani,   G.   (2005),   On   the   Semiotics   of   Music   in   Derek   B.   Scott   (ed.),  

Music,  Culture,  and  Society.  Oxford:  Oxford  University  Press,  p.  50-­‐55.  

 Кутлалиев   А.   &   Попов   А.   (2005),   Эффективность   рекламы  

[Advertising  Efficiency].  Москва:  Эксмо.      

 

Page 12: Music influence on brand perception. Survey of the commercials' communicative efficiency

12

Appendix  №  1  Key  brand  Attributes  

Brand   Key  brand  attributes  Chanel Coco Mademoiselle Feminity  

Romanticism  Discreet  luxury  

Elegance  in  simplicity  Charm  and  independence  

Grace  of  aroma  Nike Desire  to  win  

Determination  to  strive  Overcoming  yourself  

Commitment  and  perseverance  Striving  fort  success  and  

superioriy  Enthusiasm  

Miller Clubbing  Outstanding  events    

Change  in  everyday  city  life  Fresh  emotions  

Stylish  clubs  &  parties  Target  audience:  young  people  from  18  to  30  years  old,  income  –  

average  and  higher  Sberbank Security  

Lidership  Responsibility  &  stability  International  authority  

Fast  service  Resistance  to  crisis    

MegaFon High  quality  service  Available  prices  Reliability  Convinience  

Wide  range  of  services  Unified  standarts  of  service  

Pyaterochka Quality  Economy  

Respect  for  Russian  traditions  National  belonging  

Walking  distance  locations  Low  prices