Multifunctional Polymers and Composites for Aerospace ... · Insulation Materials / Advanced Air...
Transcript of Multifunctional Polymers and Composites for Aerospace ... · Insulation Materials / Advanced Air...
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
www.nasa.gov
Multifunctional Polymers and Composites for Aerospace Applications
Tiffany S. Williams, Ph.D.Materials Chemistry and Physics Branch
NASA Glenn Research [email protected]
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20190026444 2020-04-01T13:58:57+00:00Z
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
www.nasa.gov
Typical System Needs and Challenges in Aeronautics and Space
• System Challenges in Space
– Efficiency (mass and volume reduction)
– Degradation in harsh space environments
• Needs
– Lightweight materials and structures
– Materials and structures that can perform reliably in extreme environments
– Multi-functionality
• Radiation protection
• Impact resistant
• Smart materials
• System Challenges in Aeronautics
– Efficiency (power, cost)
– Mass, noise, emissions reduction
• Needs
– Higher strength and stiffness lightweight composites
– High temperature, toughened composites
– Thermal management
– Multi-functionality
• Morphing structures
• Electrically conductive composites
Min, J., Williams, T. et al, AIAA 2016-1501
Multi-functional structure with energy
storage capability
Shape Changing SMA - PMC Fan Blade
PM blade
blade tip t-dgc
M
l
10· •
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
www.nasa.gov
Novel Electrical Insulation
3
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
www.nasa.gov
Polymeric Materials for High Power Density Electric Motors• Benefits:
– Fuel Savings
– Noise Reduction
– Carbon and NOx Reduction
• Electrical Insulation Development• System need: Better thermal management for MW class,
high power density (>13 kW/kg) electric machines
• Thermally conductive electrical insulation necessary to optimize engine performance in hybrid electric motors
• Thermal conductivity of most electrical insulators: ~0.1 –0.2 W/mK
• Goal: ~1 W/mK thermal conductivity
• System challenges
• Pre-mature electrical insulation failure due to excessive heating and corona discharge
• Higher operating voltages, temperatures, and frequencies
Lightweight power transmission system
X-57 Maxwell all-electric
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
www.nasa.gov
Thermally Conductive Electrical Insulation
Dry spots
Breakdown voltage decreased by as much as 61% after large volume of additives were mixed with polymer
• Thermally Conductive, Electrical Insulation Needed• Copper wire
• Slot liner
• Potting material
• Incorporate conductive fillers to increase thermal conductivity of polymer insulation
• Adding dissimilar materials typically negatively impact insulation performance– Lower dielectric strength
– Higher chances of charge build up
– Decreased flexibility
– More interfacial polarization
• Grains and grain boundaries
> ~
QJ tlO C1J ...... 0 >
18 I - Neat siloxane
16 - 56 wt% filler/ 44 wt% siloxane
14 - 63 wt% filler/ 37 wt% siloxane
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
0:00:00 0:00:09 0 :00:17
Time (s)
I I I I I I I I I I I
6.0kV 8.0mm x150 SE(M) 4/21/2016 300um
0:00:26 0:00:35 ----------------
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
www.nasa.gov
Twin Screw Extrusion to Develop Thermally Conductive Electrical Insulation
• Advantages
– Improved polymer orientation
– Better filler dispersion and distribution
– Preferred filler directionality and alignment
– Capable of extruding large volumes of thin films and wire coating
• Process parameters
– Nanofillers? Micro-fillers? Nano/ micro- fillers?
– Effect of particle concentration
– Effect of filler material
• BN
• Mica
– Effect of filler geometry
• Sheets/platelets
• Particles
• Strand extrusion can be used for additive manufacturing
High temperature extruder
Extruded wire coating
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
www.nasa.gov
Characterizing Novel Electrical Insulation Candidates for Electric Machines
• Dielectric Analysis (DEA): Correlates chemical structure and end-use performance
– Thermal analysis tool traditionally used in manufacturing to optimize processing conditions and reduce scrap
– Provides information about dipole orientation and molecular relaxations, magnitude of conductivity, and magnitude of energy loss
• Electrical properties + molecular activity better understanding of thermo-electrical properties and chemistry to help design better insulation materials
Capacitance
Conductance
Phase shift
VOLTAG£
I CAPACITIVE
Time
loss angle
I
I MEASUR ED
phase angle
CONDUCTIVE
C (faJads) = I measured
V X applied
l /R (mhos) = I
measured X V
applied
sin e
2rcf
cos e
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
www.nasa.gov
DEA: Performance Prediction of Novel Electrical Insulation Candidates• What can DEA data tell us?
• Influence of crystallinity
• Cure-related information (kinetics, rheology)
• Frequency and temperature-dependent changes
• Changes in electrical properties due to environmental exposure (thermal breakdown, defects, moisture)
• Information Pertinent to Insulation Performance
• εʹ (relative permittivity)
• ε ʺ
• tan δ
• Ionic conductivity
• ε * (complex permittivity)
No applied field ----< 1----<--~1---· • · • · • • -------------------------<-~----•~<~~-----
• • • --------(£,-------.... Applied field
Pinduced = aE Induced dipole moment= polarizability x electric field
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
www.nasa.gov 9
DEA: Moisture and Thermal Effects on Dielectric Properties in Polyimide (PI)
Mass loss due to water loss
indiscernible in TGA • Water uptake in submerged
polyimide was ~2.1 wt%according to mass measurements
• Three commercial polyimide films investigated: (1) As received (AR); (2) Oven-dried; (3) Submerged in water
More polarizability in water submerged samples
Kapton
Frequency: 4 kHz AR PI Permittivity
Dry PI Permittivity
Submerged PI Permittivity
AR PI Ionic Conductivity
Dry PI Ionic Conductivity
Submerged PI Ionic Conductivity
Frequency Sweeps
‡Trade names and trademarks are used in this report for identification only. Their usage does not constitute an official endorsement, either expressed or implied, by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
120
100
80
e +-' ..c 60 -~ Q)
s 40
- Dry Pl (Air)
20 - AR Pl (Air)
- Submerged Pl (Air)
0
0 200 400 600 800 Temperature (Celsius)
-3 .5 -3.3 ,,l
,;I' ,,.
3 .1
·w
2.9
2.7 1 · ~
2.5
30 80 130 180 Temperature {Celsius)
60
soo ::I ;;:;· n
40g c.. -C n w -30~: ~ -'O
203 :::r 0 ..._ n
102,.
0
0
+< 0
3.5
3.3
3.1
2.9 0~ 2.7
2.5 L
:
0 I
(-0-o-Ot 0
• AR Pl (RT}
-.-AR Pl (100C}
• AR Pl (200C}
:: : 1 10 100 1goo 10000
Frequency \Hz) 100000
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
www.nasa.gov
DEA: Thermal Aging Effects on Dielectric Properties
Insulation Materials / Advanced Air Transport Technology Project / Advanced Air Vehicles Program 10
As-received PI film
Aged at 275°C (530°F) for 190 hours
• Thermal aging carried out to evaluate changes in chemical structure at potential operating temperatures
• Frequency sweeps on DEA performed at ambient temperature
• Polyimide Tg = ~381°C
Relative permittivity decrease suggests more rigid network formation during aging
2.9
2.8
2.7
2.6 w
2.5
2.4
2.3 1 10
• Aged 0 Days -+-Aged 8 Days + Aged 14 Days • Aged 21 Days
100 lQ0Q Frequency (Hz)
10000 100000
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
www.nasa.gov
Self-healable Electrical Insulation• Challenge: Polymeric aircraft electrical insulation is highly prone to damage by:
– Corona discharge at altitude
– Abrasion and cuts (maintenance)
– Damage to electrical insulation leads to electrical shorts and/or fires
• Need: Increase aircraft safety and longevity of electrical insulation over state-of-the-art insulation through self-healing
• State-of-the-Art Insulation: Polyimides
• Advantages
• Low dielectric constant and high dielectric breakdown voltage
• High thermal stability
• Disadvantages
• Moisture absorbance Electrical fires
11
Micro-cracks in polyimide after dielectric failure
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
www.nasa.gov
Typical Self-healing Mechanisms in Polymers
12
Extrinsic Healing Intrinsic “Reversible” Healing
Embedded microcapsules filled with healingagents that flow and polymerize when cracksare formed.
Microvascular networks filled with healing agentsthat flow and polymerize when cracks are formed.
Ionic clusters and other bonds that canbreak and reform
The number of healing cycles is limited with extrinsic healing approaches
• • • • • • • • • •••• • • •
·-·----------------·-·-----------------
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
www.nasa.gov
Ionically-crosslinked Polymers for Self-healable Electrical Insulation
Damaged Healed
SurlynIonomer
Damaged SurlynIonomer
Healed SurlynIonomer
Average Breakdown Voltage (kV)
16.8 ± 1.09 ~9.7 ~15.7
ε 1.567
Na+ ionomer achieved ~93% recovery in dielectric strength after healing. Over 85% recovery in mechanical strength.
No visible scars(full recovery not achieved)
Extended temperature dwell allows rearrangement of ionic networks
Material not suitable for applications with high operating temperature.
‡Trade names and trademarks are used in this report for identification only. Their usage does not constitute an official endorsement, either expressed or implied, by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Na+ coo-
-----(CH2CHl -L6- cH 1-)x \ I 2 / .
CH3 y
Sodium lonomer
2.5
2
cil.5 Q.
~
0.5
0
0 1
- As-received Surlyn
- Healed
- Healed 70C 1 hr dwell
- Healed 70C 24 hr dwell
2 Strain%
3 4
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
www.nasa.gov14
Textiles and Nano-reinforcement
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
www.nasa.gov
Structural Nanocomposites: Lightweight Structures• PMCs continue to play a significant role with reducing mass of aerospace structures• Objective: Determine if nanocomposites are a viable alternative to CFRP for composite overwrap
pressure vessels (COPVs)• Challenges with nanocomposites:
• Synthesis• Processing properties
• Goals:• Develop carbon nanotube (CNT) reinforced composites with 1.5 to 2x’s specific strength of
conventional carbon fiber composites• Improve strength of bulk CNT reinforcement through processing and post-processing
methods• Validate materials by design, fabrication, ground and flight testing of nanocomposite
overwrap pressure vessel
Split D-ring Mechanical Testing
COPV tank with nanocomposite overwrap
Williams, T., et. al, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 9327-9334
Flight-test preparation:Nanocomposite overwrap scale-up and burst-testing
c:7000.00
~6000.00-<
esooo.oo
·"' ~4000.00-
-64.14--=~ -~~----------~ ·20.14 300.00 600.00 900.00 1200.00 1500.00 1800 .00
PSI
350
'B'300
---~250 0.
~200 .c ti'o150 C ., t; 100 u -= so ·u ., a. 0 "'
(a) 0 As received O HEA X APA
~ ~ I
' ¢ Q)
4 0 5 10 15 20
Irradiation dose (x 1016 e/cm2) 25
7 (b) O As received
u 6 O HEA
1 u
--- X APA 00 --... 5 Ill 0.
f s 4 VI l ::,
3 D :5 $ ,:,
+ I
0 E 2 u -= 1 ¢ ·u .,
0 <D <D 0 a. "'
0 5 10 15 20 25 Irradiation dose (x 1016 e/cm2)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
www.nasa.gov
SUCCESSES– Developed scalable processes to impregnate,
filament wind, and cure CNT composites– Over 2 km of prepreg processed and filament
wound during materials development stage– After 2017 flight test, nano-COPV effort led to
Phase III SBIR with Nanocomp to further improve CNT yarn and tape to reduce mass in aerospace structures
16
CNT Yarn Prepregger
Four axis CNC controlled Filament Winder
CNT COPV Manufacturing: CNT Overwrap Development via
Prepreg Filament Winding
Rings of CNT prepreg on mandrel
Autoclave-cured CNT overwrap
Spool of CNT yarn prepreg
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
www.nasa.gov
Tailorable Textiles: Hybrid Reinforcement with Increased Toughness
Hybrid textiles enable integration of functional fibers into conventional reinforcement
Carbon Fiber/ Epoxy Control
CNT Yarn – Carbon Fiber/Epoxy Hybrid
Resin Impregnated Tows Max Load (N) Tex Value (g/km) Density Increase (%)
Control 282.6 ± 73.1 392.6 ± 24.0 0.0
Hybrid A 445.1 ± 43.8 505.9 ± 46.5 28.8
Hybrid B 521.6 ± 60.0 543.0 ± 52.0 38.3
Hybrid C 494.9 ± 56.2 582.6 ± 45.2 48.4
Hybrid D 541.9 ± 13.5 675.5 ± 14.7 72.1
PMCs are limited in their ability to provide adequate toughness for some aerospace applications• Resin modifiers and additives• Nanostructures grown on reinforcement• Ply Stitching
Challenges • Toughened resins: $$$$ and difficult to process• Lack of controlled nanoparticle synthesis methods• Ply stitching damages carbon fibers
Tensile Failure of Fiber Tows
-
~ ---=-~...-:-- ---=----.. , ~"~--~ .... ..__________ - -
700
600
500
z 400 -0
"' _g 300
10
200
0
0
-
Tow splitting
Strategic placement of more ductile fibers in reinforcement could
minimize areas of high axial strains
" (b)
Full field strain DIC data NASA/TM-2015-218814
- HS 6 -- HS 9 -- CF_7 - CF 10 -
0
- HS 7 - HS 8 - -- HS - 10 - CF_6 - CF_8 - CF_9
1000 2000
Extension (mm)
1.2
1 x
QJ
?0.8 ..c t'!> ~ 0 .6 Vl u '5 0.4
QJ 0..
Vl
0 .2
3000 40 0 Control Hybrid A Hybrid B Hybrid C Hybrid D
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
www.nasa.gov
Tailorable Textiles: Toughened Hybrid Reinforcement
IM7 Carbon Fiber Control Braid
Braid speed (rpm)Mandrel speed (in./min)
𝛼
2= 𝑡𝑎𝑛−1
𝑅Ω
𝑉
R: Mandrel radiusΩ: Rotational speed of braidingV: Translational mandrel speed
Triaxial braid – A&P Technologies
2D Circular Braider
Carbon Fiber-CNT Yarn Hybrid Braid
28" long
(-)
Coverage Factor (C.F.)
S.A. fiber C.F.=----
S. A. mandrel
Carbon fiber - CNT Yarn Hybrid Triaxial Braided Tube
50 55
Braid A 60 ng/e
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
www.nasa.gov 19
Tailorable Textiles: Durable Electrically Conductive Textiles (E-textiles)
• E-textile uses in aerospace • Spacesuits• Sensors• Inflatables• Blankets• Health monitors
• Production• Screen printing with conductive polymers• Embroidery and stitching
• Stainless steel fibers• Metallic coating on non-conductive fibers
• Fabrics
Axial Axial
Braidingyarn
(warp)
Braidingyarn
(weft)
HybridTow
HybridTow
CarbonFiber
Carbon Fiber
Enhanced toughness
HybridTow
HybridTow
CarbonFiber
Carbon Fiber
Electrical conductivity
• Challenges with e-textiles• Durability• Reliability• Manufacturing challenges• Reparability• May not have good flexibility depending
on method
CNT yarn stitched circuit on ballistic Kevlar
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
www.nasa.gov
Tailorable Textiles: Shear Thickening Fluid (STF)– Enhanced Fabrics for Impact Energy Dissipation
• STFs are dilatant, colloidal suspensions that behave like a solid above a critical shear rate
• Hydrodynamic interactions between nanoparticles lead to stiffness increase
• STF-treated fabrics have been used as effective, puncture-resistant textiles for flexible body armor (Army Research Lab/ Univ. of Delaware)
• Can STFs provide protection against micro-meteor impacts in space?
Goal: Develop lightweight, flexible, impact-resistant textiles for inflatable habitat shells to provide protection against micro-meteoroid orbital debris fewer redundant layers mass reduction
Impact-resistant habitat shells and spacesuits
Cubic nanoparticles create stronger hydrodynamic interactions than spherical nanoparticles
Tailorable Text·les: Shear hicken·ng Fluid (STF)- Enhanced Fabrics for Impact E ergy Dissipation
l.0E+07
l.0E+06
l.0E+0S
'0'1.0E+04 C1J a.. ';:l.0E+03 --~ U')
8 l.0E+02 U')
> l.0E+0l
l.0E+00
l.0E-01
l.0E-02
• RT • 0C ••• •• -20C • -40C
• •
•• •• • ••••• •• ••• ...... :•,.
• • •••••• ••• • • • • • • • • •••••• • •
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 Shear rate {1/s)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
www.nasa.gov
Textiles: Shear Thickening Fluid – Enhanced Fabrics
Torsional Rheology of STF-treated Fabrics
• Torsional rheology of STF-treated fabrics showed slight increase in shear stress at higher frequencies
• Preliminary results from impact tests did not show improvement in energy absorption in STF-treated fabrics• Fabric too concentrated• Layup not ideal• Mixing/test methods not optimized
• Need better understanding of shear thickening mechanism in STF-treated textiles
Impact Testing STF-treated Fabrics30
25
--,
:;20 <].)
..c ,._ 0 ~ 15 ro > e_D <].) 10 C:
LU
5
• • •
::::~·.·.·:::~·.·.-::::·:::::·::::::·::::,, .. __ ,,, ... ·.:::::.·.t .. •
• • 7 layer weave STF • 7 layer weave AR RT
• • •
•··· Linear (7 layer weave STF)
0 L Linear (7 layer weave AR RT)
1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Impact Velocity (ft/s)
Untreated Weave Impact velocity: 2350 ft/s
(Back)
1.40E+07
1.20E+07
- 1.00E+07 ro a..
~ 8.00E+06 ~ .....
V')
,._ 6.00E+06 ro <].)
..c V') 4.00E+06
-a-Kevlar Plain Weave - RT
..-1 to 1 Weave - RT
• 2 to 1 Weave - RT
2.00E+06
0.00E+00
.---.It--___ ...... r_, . ...---a • ..-------.11 • .--- •
• • • • 0
STF-treated Weave Impact velocity: 2401 ft/s
(Back)
25
• • • so 75 100 125
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
www.nasa.gov
Summary
• Polymers play an important role in multifunctional materials developmentmany projects are ongoing
• Mature polymer and composites processing and characterization methods are still viable to develop multi-functional materials
– Extrusion
– Filament winding/ prepreg production
– Braiding
– DEA
• Lots of potential to integrate multifunctionality into textiles
22
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
www.nasa.gov
Acknowledgements• Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate
– Advanced Air Transport Technology Project (AATT)
– Convergent Aeronautics Solutions Program CAS
• Space Technology Mission Directorate
– Center Innovation Fund
– STMD Game Changing
• Linda McCorkle: Microscopy and rheology
• Dan Scheiman: Thermal analysis
• John Thesken: NanoCOPV Flight test lead
• Brad Lerch: Mechanical testing facilities lead
• Dan Gorican: Filament winding
• Paula Heimann: Filament winding and CNT composites processing
• Nathan Wilmoth and Andrew Ring: CNT ring mechanical testing
• Chuck Ruggeri: Impact testing
• NASA Internship Program
• Industrial Partner: Nanocomp Technologies
23
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
www.nasa.gov