Mud Report 1
-
Upload
brahim-letaief -
Category
Documents
-
view
13 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Mud Report 1
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 1TBT I 2014
Vorlesung Tiefbohrtechnik 1
Introduction to Rotary-Drilling Technology (inc. Rig Count)
Drilling a Well, Drilling methods
Rock Mechanics I
Drilling Mud: Functions, Properties, Rheology
Rock Mechanics II, Well stability
Borehole hydraulics, Overbalance vs. Underbalance
Drilling bits, Selection criteria
Drilling optimisation concepts
Drill-string basics
Downhole motors I (Theory, Moineu Motoren)
Downhole motors II (Turbinen, Selection Criteria)
Special drilling systems (Drilling Hammer, Coring)
Formation pressure, Frac-gradienten
Measuring drilling parameters
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 2TBT I 2014
Drilling Hydraulics Applications
Calculation of subsurface hydrostatic pressures that may tend to burst or collapse well tubulars or fracture exposed formations
Several aspects of blowout prevention
Displacement of cement slurries and resulting stresses in the casing string
Bit nozzle size selection for optimum hydraulics
Surge or swab pressures due to vertical pipe movement
Carrying capacity of drilling fluids
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 3TBT I 2014
Pressure drop in a well
Pp=Psc + Pdp + Pdc + Pdt + Pb + Pdca + Pdpa >50%
Less than 50%
PP Pump pressure
PSC surface equipment
Pdp Drill pipe
Pdc Drill collar
Pb - Bit
Pdca Annulus in DC Range
Pdpa Annulus in DP range
DP DC
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 4TBT I 2014
Wellbore hydraulics
HYDROSTATICS
HYDRODINAMCS
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 5TBT I 2014
Buoyancy Force = weight of fluid displaced (Archimedes, 250 BC)
Figure 4 -9. Hydraulic forces acting on a foreign body
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 6TBT I 2014
Effective (buoyed) Weight
s
fe 1WW
s
f
f
be
W-W
V-W
FWWWe = buoyed weight
W = weight in air
f= fluid density
s= steel density
Fb = buoyancy force
V = volume
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 7TBT I 2014
Effective (buoyed) Weight
s
fe 1WW
Buoyancy Factor (BF)
Valid for a solid body or an open-ended pipe! (WHY?)
s
f1BF
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 8TBT I 2014
Types of Flow: Laminar Flow
Flow pattern is linear (no radial flow)
Velocity at wall is ZERO
Produces minimal hole erosion
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 9TBT I 2014
Types of Flow: Laminar Flow
Mud properties strongly affect pressure losses
Is preferred flow type for annulus (in vertical wells)
Laminar flow is sometimes referred to as sheet flow, or
layered flow:
* As the flow velocity increases, the flow type changes from laminar to
turbulent.
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 10TBT I 2014
Types of Flow: Turbulent Flow
Flow pattern is random (flow in all directions)
Tends to produce hole erosion
Results in higher pressure losses (takes more energy)
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 11TBT I 2014
Mud properties have little effect on pressure losses
Is the usual flow type inside the drill pipe and collars
Thin laminar boundary layer at the wall
High turbulent flow is found under the bit and
sometime in the annular area around drill collars and
stabilizers
Types of flow : Turbulent flow
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 12TBT I 2014
Types of f low:Turbulent flow
Fig. 4-30. Laminar and turbulent flow patterns in a
circular pipe: (a) laminar flow, (b) transition between
laminar and turbulent flow and (c) turbulent flow
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 13TBT I 2014
pf = 11.41 v 1.75
turbulent flow
pf = 9.11 v
laminar flow
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 14TBT I 2014
Turbulent Flow - Newtonian Fluid
The onset of turbulence in pipe flow is characterized
by the dimensionless group known as the Reynolds
number
dvN
_
Re
dv928N
_
Re
In field units,
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 15TBT I 2014
Turbulent Flow - Newtonian Fluid in SI units
We often assume that fluid flow is
turbulent if Nre > 2,100
cp. fluid, ofviscosity
in I.D., piped
ft/s velocity,fluid avg. v
lbm/gal density, fluid where
_
dvN
_
Re
Kg/m3
m/sec
m
Pa s
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 16TBT I 2014
Turbulent Flow - Newtonian Fluid in field units
We often assume that fluid flow is
turbulent if Nre > 2,100
cp. fluid, ofviscosity
in I.D., piped
ft/s velocity,fluid avg. v
lbm/gal density, fluid where
_
dv928N
_
Re
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 17TBT I 2014
Non-static Well Conditions
Physical Laws
Rheological Models
Equations of State
FLUID FLOW
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 18TBT I 2014
Physical Laws
Conservation of mass
Conservation of energy
Conservation of momentum
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 19TBT I 2014
Physical Laws
constant2211 qvAvA
konstanthgp2
v0
2
Conservation of mass
Conservation of energy
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 20TBT I 2014
Law of Conservation of Energy (Brnoulli)
States that as a fluid flows from A to B:
QW
vvDDg
VpVpEE
2
1
2
212
112212
2
1
In the wellbore, in many cases Q = 0 (heat)
= constant{
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 21TBT I 2014
Physical Laws
Stokes Law
18
dg)(v
2
mcs
sr vv
Cutting transport
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 22TBT I 2014
Settling velocity, after Bourgoyne et al.
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 23TBT I 2014
Slip Velocity, after Bourgoyne et al.
189.1f
sss
f
dv
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 24TBT I 2014
Particle Slip Velocity - small particles
cp viscosity, fluid
in particle, of diameterd
lbm/gal fluid, ofdensity
lbm/gal particle, solid of density
ft/s velocity, slipv
s
f
s
s
2
sfss
d)(138v
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 25TBT I 2014
Intermediate: 1/3af
2/3
fsss
_
)(
)(2.90dv
Fully Turbulent:f
fsss
_ )(d1.54v
Particle Slip Velocity other than laminar
Note: all equations are in field units
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 26TBT I 2014
Rheological Models
Newtonian
Bingham Plastic
Power Law
API Power-Law
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 27TBT I 2014
Typical Drilling Fluid Vs. Newtonian, Bingham and Power Law Fluids
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 28TBT I 2014
Equations of State
Incompressible fluid
Slightly compressible fluid
Ideal gas
Real gas
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 29TBT I 2014
Average Fluid Velocity (SI units)
Pipe Flow Annular Flow
WHERE
v = average velocity, m/s
q = flow rate, m3/s
d = internal diameter of pipe, m
d2 = internal diameter of outer pipe or borehole, m
d1 = external diameter of inner pipe, m
2
4d
qv
2
1
2
24
dd
qv
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 30TBT I 2014
Average Fluid Velocity (field units)
Pipe Flow Annular Flow
WHERE
v = average velocity, ft/s
q = flow rate, gal/min
d = internal diameter of pipe, in.
d2 = internal diameter of outer pipe or borehole, in.
d1 = external diameter of inner pipe, in.
2448.2 d
qv
2
1
2
2448.2 dd
qv
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 31TBT I 2014
Velocity Profiles (laminar flow)
(a) pipe flow and (b) annular flow
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 32TBT I 2014
Representing the Circular Annulus as a Slot
)r(r W slot of Width
)r(r h slot ofHeight
rr Wh slot equivalent of Area
12
12
2
1
2
2
{ slot approximation is OK if (d1/d2 > 0.3 }
Equal
Area
and
Height
Simpler
Equations
-yet
accurate
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 33TBT I 2014
Free body diagram for fluid element in a narrow slot
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 34TBT I 2014
yWdL
dpp y WpF
ypWF
f22
1
Representing the Annulus as a Slot
F4 = y + yW L = +ddy
y W L
F3 = W L
Consider:
- pressure forces
- viscous forces
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 35TBT I 2014
Representing the Annulus as a Slot
state,steady At
F = maSumming forces along flow:
F = 0
F1
F2 + F3 F4 = 0
0LWdy
d -LWyW
dL
dp-p -y pW f
,gSimplifyindp fdL
ddy
= 0
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 36TBT I 2014
Representing the Annulus as a Slot
dy
dv
:integrate and variablesSeparate
Model, FluidNewtonian With
dL
dp
dy
d f=
dL
dpy 0
f Evaluate 0 at wall where y = 0
But, -dy
dv= So,
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 37TBT I 2014
Representing the Annulus as a Slot
dyydL
dp-dv 0
f
00f
2
vy
dL
dp
2
yv
o
f
dL
dpy
dy
dv+=-
0 v0,y when 0 vSince 0
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 38TBT I 2014
Representing the Annulus as a Slot
h-
dL
dp
2
h-0 h,y when 0 vSince 0f
2
dL
dp
2
h- f0
2f yhydL
dp
2
1v
Hence, substituting for v0 and 0 :
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 39TBT I 2014
Representing the Annulus as a Slot
vWdyvdAq
The total flow rate:
h
0
2f dy yhydL
dp
2
Wq
dL
dp
12
Whq f
3
g,Integratin
12
2
1
2
2 rrh and )r(rWhBut
( )2f yhydL
dp
2
1v -=
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 40TBT I 2014
Representing the Annulus as a Slot
2
12
2
1
2
2f )r)(rr(r
dL
dp
12q
)r(r
q
A
qv
2
1
2
2
velocity,averageBut
2
12
_
f
)r(r
v12
dL
dp
dL
dp
12
Whq f
3
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 41TBT I 2014
Representing the Annulus as a Slot
2
12
_
f
)r(r
v12
dL
dp
In field units,
2
12
_
f
)d1000(d
v
dL
dp
psi/ft, cp., ft/sec, in
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 42TBT I 2014
Hydraulics Optimization
The Art of Compromise
- Improve Annulus cutting transport versus Bit
flow regime (high velocity vs. Low pressure
drop)
Optimising Targets
- Maximizing Hydraulic Horsepower (HHP)
- Maximizing Impact Force (HIP)
- Maximizing Nozzle velocity (HNV)
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 43TBT I 2014
Horsepower
Horsepower is defined as work per time
Hydraulic horsepower is calculated as follows:
PQ
Where:
Q = Flowrate in gallons/minute
P = bit pressure drop in psi
1714
PQ
Where:
Q = Flowrate in cubic meters/minute
P = bit pressure drop in Pa
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 44TBT I 2014
Horsepower
Please derive this equation for: flowrate in L/min
and pressure in bar
?PQ
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 45TBT I 2014
Input Horsepower Requirement
Input horsepower requirement is the
horsepower required to be used to develop the
desired output horsepower. Note that there is
always the efficiency that reduces the output/
- Function of Energy conversion efficiency- Energy conversion to energy source (Diesel Engines, Generators)
- Energy source to pump prime mover (Electric motor, Diesel Engine)
- Prime mover losses through coupling (transmission, gearbox, belt slip, friction, etc.)
- Pump efficiency
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 46TBT I 2014
Setting Flow Rates
Q maximum
Q optimum
Q minimum
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 47TBT I 2014
Q Minimum
Roller Cone Bits: Bottom Hole Cleaning (removing cuttings and transport them in annular section)
- Additionally: Bit cooling and cleaning
Fixed Cutter Bits: Cutter cooling and
cleaning (temperature sensible tools)
- Additionally: Hole cleaning (why?)
Delay time to get cuttings samples to surface which
reduce the ability to react.
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 48TBT I 2014
Q Maximum
Hole erosion
- Turbulent Flow (very controversial today)
E.C.D. effects
- Fracture Gradient (max. Q > increase pressure loss)
- R.O.P. Reduction (Why?)
Pump capacity (limited power)
Surface volume handling and treating
capacity
Energy expenses and costs
Equipment wear
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 49TBT I 2014
Setting QMinimum
Hole Cleaning:
- Rule of Thumb (v = 0.3 to 0.8 m/s)
- Observation (experience)
- Slip Velocity (Stokes or other)
Bit Cooling and Cleaning:
- Empirical Recommendations
- Observation
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 50TBT I 2014
Setting QMaximum
Hole Erosion
- Turbulent Flow
- Strength of Formation Being Drilled
E.C.D. Effects- Mud Rheology
- Fracture Gradient
- R.O.P. Reduction
Pump Capacity
- Pressure Limits
- Flow Rate Limits
- Horsepower Limits
- Surface Equipment Pressure Limitations
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 51TBT I 2014
Setting QMaximum
Surface Volume Handling and Treating Capacity- Solids Control Equipment Limits
- Gas Handling Limits
Energy Expenses and Costs
- High Horsepower Use Leads to Increased Fuel
Consumption
Equipment Wear
- High Pressure and Flow Rates Leads to Increased Wear
and Tear on Equipment
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 52TBT I 2014
Bit Hydraulics Optimization Methods
Hydraulic effectiveness can be optimized two ways:
- Maximum hydraulic horsepower at the bit
- Maximum impact force at the bit
Maximum cleaning efficiency is limited by surface equipment limits and energy limits (i.e. pumps, lines).
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 53TBT I 2014
vpb ppp
Pump pressure System losses
Hydraulic Horse Power at bit
vpbb ppqqpH
Flow rate
Pressure Loss at the Bit
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 54TBT I 2014
bn
p2v
bdn
p2cv
cd = 0,95 - 0,98
Jet velocity at bit nozzle
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 55TBT I 2014
Maximum Impact Force at the Bit
McLean performed experimental work that indicated that bit cleaning was maximized when the impact force was maximized at the bit. This was supported by studies performed by Eckel who found that maximum impact force lead to maximum rate of penetration.
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 56TBT I 2014
Maximum Horsepower at the Bit
Bit horsepower is maximized when the bit pressure
loss is equal to:
0.57 x Psystem
Psystem is limited by equipment and power available.
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 57TBT I 2014
Maximum Impact Force at the Bit
Kendall and Goins determined the impact force was maximized when bit pressure loss is equal to:
0.47 x Psystem
Psystem is limited by equipment and power available.
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 58TBT I 2014
Maximum Horsepower at the Bit
Kendall and Goins derived a relationship for
maximizing horsepower at the bit. The derivation
of this relationship is left to the class participant.
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 59TBT I 2014
Setting QOptimum
Cutting transport Pump limitation
Maximizing ROP
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 60TBT I 2014
Example of Hydraulic calculationsKonzept vj max Hb max
HHP
Fj max
HIF
Pump pressure pp [MPa] 25,00 25,00 25,00
Flow rate qopt[L/min]
800 1019 1209
Bit pressure Drop pb [MPa] 18,66 15,69 11,33
System pressure loss pv [MPa] 6,34 9,31 13,67
Total input Power Hp [kW] 333 425 504
Bit (horse) power Hb [kW] 248,77 266,50 228,31
Impulse force Fj [N] 2675,88 3146,22 3312,30
Jet velocity vj [m/s] 171,13 156,91 133,33
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 61TBT I 2014
Example of Hydraulic calculations
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Bit
pre
ss
ure
dro
p
pre
ss
ure
lo
ss
[%p p
]
vj HHP HIF
optimization concept
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 62TBT I 2014
Example of Hydraulic calculations
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
Pump rate[L/min]
Hb [
kW
]
vj [m
/s]
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
Fj [k
W]
vj
Fj
Hb
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 63TBT I 2014
Pressure loss in surface equipment
86,1
z
qCp
C = Pressure loss coefficient
z = Unit coefficient
Pump Surface pipes Mud Hose Swivel Kelly
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 64TBT I 2014
Alternative Hydraulic Designs
Vortex
Nozzles
Clean Sweep
Mudpick
Switchblade
Asymmetric
NozzlesAll pictures courtesy of Schlumberger
-
Dr. Catalin Teodoriu
Institut fr Erdl- und Erdgastechnik 65TBT I 2014Viewing the Well as a Manometer