Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania Risk Assessment

53
Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania Risk Assessment William D. McKain CPA Finance Director – Mt. Lebanon

description

Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania Risk Assessment. William D. McKain CPA Finance Director – Mt. Lebanon. Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania. The Municipality operates under a Home Rule Charter with five elected commissioners, one from each ward which also provides for the council/manager form of government. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania Risk Assessment

Page 1: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania Risk Assessment

William D. McKain CPAFinance Director – Mt. Lebanon

Page 2: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

2

Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania

The Municipality operates under a Home Rule Charter with five elected commissioners, one from each ward which also provides for the council/manager form of government.

Residential housing stock is varied in style and price and includes a 2007 sales range from $50,000 to $1,089,625.

The average sales price for housing climbed to $227,301 (up 2.6% from the prior year in a very challenging housing market) and the residential sales prices have increased at an average rate of 4.3% over the past five years.

Page 3: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

3

Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania

33,017 population.

$29.2 million - 2007 general fund budget.

$7+ million sewage fund (of which $4.0 million was budgeted to fund sewer work) in addition to a capital project and special revenue funds.

Provides variety of traditional services in addition to a full-time career fire department, community magazine, GIS, crossing guards and leaf pick-up.

Page 4: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

4

What are the risk standards?

The Audit Risk Standards– SAS no. 104, Amendment to Statement on Auditing Standards No. 1, Codification of

Auditing Standards and Procedures (“Due Professional Care in the Performance of Work”)

– SAS no. 105, Amendment to Statement on Auditing Standards No. 95, Generally Accepted Auditing Standards

– SAS no. 106, Audit Evidence– SAS no. 107, Audit Risk and Materiality in Conducting an Audit– SAS no. 108, Planning and Supervision– SAS no. 109, Understanding the Entity and Its Environment and Assessing the Risks

of Material Misstatement– SAS no. 110, Performing Audit Procedures in Response to Assessed Risks and

Evaluating the Audit Evidence Obtained– SAS no. 111, Amendment to Statement on Auditing Standards No. 39, Audit

Sampling

Page 5: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

5

What are the risk standards?

These Statements establish standards and provide guidance concerning the auditor’s assessment of the risks of material misstatement (whether caused by error or fraud) in a financial statement audit, and the design and performance of audit procedures whose nature, timing, and extent are responsive to the assessed.

Although the standards are audit guidance – it is very important for the auditee to understand its importance and value.

Page 6: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

6

What are the risk standards?

The Standards are designed to enhance an auditors’ response to risk materiality and encourage them to focus on areas with the greatest risk of misstatement.

The primary objective of these Statements is to enhance auditors’ application of the audit risk model in practice by specifying, among other things a more in-depth understanding of the entity and its environment, including its internal control, to identify the risks of material misstatement in the financial statements and what the entity is doing to mitigate them.

Page 7: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

7

What is risk?

Risk assessment is the identification and analysis of relevant risks to the achievement of an organization's objectives, for the purpose of determining how those risks should be managed.

Risk assessment begins with an initial determination of operating objectives, followed by a systematic identification of those things that could prevent each objective from being attained. In other words, it's an analysis of what could go wrong.

Page 8: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

8

What is risk?

Not all risks are equal. Some are more likely than others to occur, and some will have a greater impact if they occur. Once risks are identified, their probability and significance must be assessed.

Finally, having identified and assessed risk, management must decide how to deal with it.

Page 9: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

9

Mt. Lebanon approach to risk

Mt. Lebanon takes very seriously its responsibilities for adopting sound accounting policies, establishing and maintaining internal controls, and preventing and detecting fraud.

We believe all municipal employees must be good stewards of municipal assets and continually develop and monitor controls to safeguard these assets.

Our risk assessment process provided an opportunity to examine, document and measure our controls.

Page 10: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

10

Getting Started – preliminary work

Communicate and consult with your auditors - great resource.

Read the Statement of Auditing Standards (SAS) on Risk Assessment (SAS#’s 104 through 112) and any related articles and literature to research and gain an understanding of the new standards.

Formulate, at least conceptually, an approach to measure and document the risk assessment’s impact to your organization.

Obtain management’s support of this endeavor.

Page 11: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

11

Getting Started – preliminary work

Met with all directors, staff office chiefs and key department staff to communicate and introduce the standards and stress their importance.

These meetings and subsequent communications included discussions of the specific impacts on each department, specific related financial policies, brainstorming sessions and a healthy discussion of the potential risks and controls to the various departmental processes.

Departments were asked to take a step back, think and respond as if they ran their own business or were looking at risks and appropriate controls as a homeowner?

Page 12: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

12

Getting Started – preliminary work

As an initial step, each department received and completed the following matrix to explore and document their specific risks and controls.

Financial Statement

AreaWhat Could Go Wrong? Control

Is the control manual

control or computer

dependent?Performed

By?Other

comments/notes

DEPARTMENT -

Page 13: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

13

Getting Started – preliminary work

The finance department reviewed the initial responses and conducted many various follow-up meetings with departments to analyze and discuss in greater detail their department risk areas and controls.

This stage:– Required some initial patience and guidance with

departments.– Great deal of relentlessness.– Department prospective can be interesting but they should

be commended for the effort.– Work through each department’s processes and controls.– You also discover you don’t know everything you think you

know.

Page 14: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

14

Getting Started - time to document

The staring point for any organization to assess its risks is to examine its current internal control structure and its effectiveness. An effective and comprehensive internal control structure must encompass the following five elements.

1. Control environment

2. Control related policies and procedures

3. Information and communication

4. Monitoring

5. Continuing assessment of risk

Page 15: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

15

Getting Started - time to document

Control Environment - compliance

Management sets the correct tone by believing internal control is important to achieving our goals, and communicates that view to employees at all levels.

This commitment includes an ongoing investment of time, effort and resources. Our belief is that an effective internal control structure is an integral part of the process of providing high level of services to citizens.

Page 16: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

16

Getting Started - time to document

Control Related Policies and Procedures - compliance

The finance department has developed a comprehensive listing of financial policies and procedures to:

– Ensure ongoing fiscal stability.– Improve the organization’s processes.– Serve as a key element of sound fiscal administration.– Provide guidance and be decision points for staff.– Identify acceptable and unacceptable courses of action in

which departments (and for that matter governments) can operate.

– Allow for consistency despite board/staff turnover.

THIS IS A KEY TO RISK ASSESSMENT CONTROL DOCUMENTATION THAT BECOMES AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE PROCESS!

Page 17: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

17

Getting Started - time to document

Information and Communication – compliance

Internal controls and financial polices and procedures are communicated in various ways. Policies are formal and in writing and may be communicated at weekly director staff meetings, separate staff training, by e-mail and are always posted on the internal municipal website for easy employee access.

Page 18: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

18

Getting Started - time to document

Monitoring - complianceIt is the responsibility of all municipal employees to adhere and enforce our adopted financial policies. The Finance Director and staff see daily financial transactions that are impacted by financial policies and therefore are in the best position to enforce the policies.

In addition, the finance director conducts internal audits on a wide-variety of municipal functions and processes. These audits often measure compliance to existing polices and procedures and sometimes result in new polices based on the findings and recommendations of these reports.

Page 19: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

19

Getting Started - time to document

Continuing assessment of risk – compliance

We measure and monitor our risks on an on-going basis in a variety of ways. The following are key methods of assessment:

– Daily processing of financial transactions through the finance department is a constant and effective tool to enforce, monitor and gauge the effectiveness of current policies.

– In August 2004, Mt. Lebanon adopted a Fraud Policy which is communicated to all employees. This policy and related procedures for the reporting, investigation, and resolution of fiscal irregularities are established as an integral part of Mt. Lebanon’s efforts to ensure that all employees conduct themselves in accordance with high ethical standards and our performance with respect to these matters is consistently applied.

Page 20: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

20

Getting Started - time to document

Continuing assessment of risk – compliance (continued)

We measure and monitor our risks on an on-going basis in a variety of ways. The following are key methods of assessment:

– Internal audits and associated findings and recommendations are conducted by the finance director to:

a. Strengthen internal controls.

b. Enforce current policies.

c. Obtain information to develop new policies or revise existing ones.

d. Monitor the controls of your organization.

e. Be a deterrent to fraud.

f. Identify and catch fraud.

Page 21: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

21

Getting Started - time to document

Continuing Assessment of Risk – compliance (continued)

We measure and monitor our risks on an on-going basis in a variety of ways. The following are key methods of assessment:

– Periodic review of current polices is on going to ensure they stay current and remain effective.

– New problems, issues or events can be identified to determine whether a new policy is necessary to ensure internal controls are adequate, and that the integrity of data in the accounting systems and assets are protected against loss and abuse.

Page 22: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

22

Review – Revenues Overall

The adopted 2007 general fund budget is $29,211,230. Taxes comprise $21,567,400 or 73.8% of the total budgeted revenues.

– Real estate is the largest revenue source budgeted at $10.3 million and funds 35.2% of general fund activities.

– The second largest revenue source is earned income

taxes which accounts $8.7 million or 29.8% of the budgeted revenues.

Page 23: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

23

Review – Revenues Overall

Percent of

2007 Budget Budget

REVENUES

Taxes

Real Estate 10,274,040$ 35.2%

Earned Income 8,713,960 29.8%

Emergency & Municipal Service Tax 454,000 1.6%

Real Estate Transfer 1,500,000 5.1%

County Sales 620,000 2.1%

Utility 5,400 0.0%

Total Taxes 21,567,400 73.8%

Non-Tax Revenues

Licenses, Permits & Fees 742,120 2.5%

Fines, Forfeitures & Penalties 143,800 0.5%

Investment & Rental 65,000 0.2%

PA State Pension Contribution 610,020 2.1%

Intergovernmental - Grants 825,050 2.8%

Recreation 2,391,160 8.2%

Magazine/Public Information 623,000 2.1%

Charges for Service & Other Revenue 1,205,310 4.1%

Transfers From State Highway & Sewage 914,340 3.1%

Use of Surplus/Fund Balance 124,030 0.4%

Total Non-Tax Revenues 7,643,830 26.2%

Total Revenues 29,211,230$ 100.0%

2007 GENERAL FUND REVENUE BUDGET TABLE

Page 24: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

24

Review – Revenues Overall

What could go wrong: Receipts may not be received, recorded properly, and deposited in a timely manner.

Control: Monthly closing and reports issued. Monitoring tool for departmental and overall financial operations. Perform analytical procedures and review variances between the

current actual and percentage of budget year expired. Significant differences are investigated to provide analysis and understanding.

Page 25: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

25

Review – Revenues Overall

Revenues control (continued): Revenues due to the municipality are pursued through past due

notifications and other collection procedures including, if applicable, filing liens to protect our claims. Lastly, the municipality reports all outstanding payments due to us on the municipal claims letter.

Revenue policies that limits risk – Receipts Deposit Policy– Sequential Numbering & Accounting of Receipts Policy– Magazine Revenue Recognition Policy– Customer Service Center Payment Procedures and Guidelines– Intergovernmental Grants Policy– Return Check Policy– Interim Assessment Policy and Procedures

Page 26: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

26

Revenues – Drill-Down

Subsequent to identifying risk and controls for general fund revenues overall, a drill- down approach was conducted to document all other revenues that have specific issues detailing risks and associated controls.

Risk Assessment Review and Documentation: a. General Fund Revenuesb. Real Estate Taxesc. Earned Income Taxesd. Emergency Municipal Services Taxes (EMST) and Local Services Taxes (LST)e. Real Estate Transfer & Allegheny County Sales Tax (ARAD)f. Investmentsg. Grantsh. Recreation & Charges for Servicesi. Magazine Advertising Revenues

Page 27: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

27

Review – Expenditures Overall

Percent of 2007 Budget Budget

EXPENDITURES Operating General Government 2,522,570$ 8.6% Magazine/Public Information 833,060 2.9% Community Development 827,880 2.8% Public Works 6,548,200 22.4% Human Services 1,050,280 3.6% Recreation 2,728,390 9.3% Public Safety : Police 5,829,410 20.0% Fire & Emergency management 2,852,230 9.8% Animal Control & Crossing guards 723,970 2.5% 9-1-1 Center 401,930 1.4% Total Operating 24,317,920 83.2%

PA State Pension Contribution 610,020 2.1% Capital Improvements 1,001,000 3.4% Debt Service 2,482,290 8.5% Fund Balance Enhancement 200,000 0.7% Transfers to Capital Project Funds 600,000 2.1%

Total Expenditures 29,211,230$ 100.0%

Page 28: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

28

Review – Expenditures Overall

The adopted 2007 general fund budget is $29,211,230 and can

be further broken down by object code description

Description Amount % of

Budget Payroll (salaries, wages and overtime) 10,651,370 36.5%Fringe benefits 4,639,270 15.9%Total Personnel 15,290,640 52.3%

Contracted services 8,311,310 28.5%Commodities 1,525,990 5.2%

Total operating expenditures 25,127,940 33.7%

Debt service 2,482,290 8.5%Capital 1,001,000 3.4%Operating transfers 600,000 2.1%

Total expenditures by object 29,211,230 100.0%

2007 expenditure budget by object code

Page 29: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

29

Review – Expenditures Overall

Overall review of the our allocation of resources indicates as follows:

– Personnel costs are our largest resource allocation, which comprise 52.3% of our operating budget.

– The remaining most material expenditures are funds allocated for contracted services (28.5%), commodities (5.2%) and debt service (8.5%).

Page 30: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

30

Expenditures – Drill-Down

Subsequent to identifying risk and controls for general fund expenditures overall, a drill- down approach was conducted to document all other expenditures that have specific issues detailing risks and associated controls.

Risk Assessment Review and Documentation: a. Payrollb. Fringe Benefitsc. Accounts Payabled. Debt Servicee. Undesignated Fund Balancef. Capital Assets & Capital Projects Fund

Page 31: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

31

Expenditures – Drill-Down

PayrollWhat could go Pay rates are incorrect.wrong: An employee doesn’t work the hours

recorded on time sheet.Payments are made to a person that is

not an employee.

Control: Documentation of controls.

Payroll policies Payroll Timesheets Signature and Authorization Policy

that limit risk: Fraud Policy

Page 32: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

32

Expenditures – Drill-Down

Payroll Exercise

We ran a series of payroll reports to analyze:– Any inactivity over the past two year period and should they still be

active in the system (some retirees still receive payments). – Ran parallel payroll names to accounts payable names and addresses.

Results:– Names were deleted or made inactive due to inactivity and/or no

longer entitled to any payments through our system.– The development of a Related Party Transactions Policy.

This resulted in a current payroll file with only active employees in the system and thus significantly reducing the risk of processing a paycheck to a non-employee.  This procedure will now be performed on an annual basis.

Page 33: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

33

Expenditures – Drill-Down

Fringe BenefitsWhat could go Medical and other fringe benefit rates are not accuratewrong: and/or higher than budget.

Payments for non-employees (retirees) are not accurate.Certain non-cash fringe benefits may be taxable per the Internal Revenue Service code.

Control: Documentation of controls.

Fringe benefit Mt. Lebanon Taxable Fringe Benefits Guidelines & Policy

policies that limit risk:

Page 34: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

34

Expenditures – Drill-Down

Accounts Payable What could go Payments made without sufficient documentation

and/orwrong: approval.

Duplicate payments are made.Budgeted funds insufficient to cover submitted

payment requests.Payments may be made without appropriate bids or

quotes. Engagements are made for contracted services

without appropriate approval.Payments may be made to non-existent vendor. Vendor information is not accurate or reliable for IRS.IRS 1099-Miscellaneous forms inaccuracies.

Control: Documentation of controls.

Page 35: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

35

Expenditures – Drill-Down

Accounts Payable

Payable policies Purchase order Policy

that limit risk: Contract Checklist Purpose & Procedures Policy

Petty Cash Guidelines

Municipal Credit Card Policy

Food Purchasing Guidelines

Related Party Transactions Policy

Page 36: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

36

Expenditures – Drill-Down

Accounts Payable Exercise

We ran a battery of account payable reports to analyze:– Any inactivity over the past two year period.– Sent letters to all vendors asking for an update on their account information.– Requesting new IRS W-9 forms.

Results:– Reduction by 47% of vendors that had no activity within two years. – Remaining active vendors submitted Internal Revenue Service (IRS) W-9

forms.

These steps reduced the risk of making payments to non-existent vendors, formally memorialize the vendor’s tax identification number (TIN), the vendor’s taxable or non-taxable filing status and ensures our records are accurate for compliance regarding IRS 1099-Miscellaneous forms issued to appropriate vendors. On an annual basis, this procedure will be completed to “scrub” and update the accounts payable vendor master file list.

Page 37: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

37

Expenditures – Drill-Down

Debt ServiceWhat could go Debt service payments are not properly budgeted. wrong: The Municipality is not in compliance with requirements of

the Local Government Unit Debt Act of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the debt provision(s) outlined in the Mt. Lebanon Home Rule Charter, as well as applicable Federal and State legislation.

Control: Documentation of controls.

Debt Service Mt. Lebanon Debt PolicyPolicies that limit risk:

Page 38: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

38

Expenditures – Drill-Down

Undesignated Fund Balance

What could go The balance of the undesignated fund balance is not at

wrong: an adequate level.

Control: In 2005, Mt. Lebanon set a five-year goal to add $1 million to the undesignated fund balance and have

the level be between 8 and 10 percent. In 2006 and 2007 a budgeted fund balance enhancement line item of

$200,000 was incorporated per year to begin this program. As of December 31, 2006, the Municipality’s undesignated fund balance is 8.2% of general fund revenues

Page 39: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

39

Expenditures – Drill-Down

Capital Assets & Capital Projects Fund

What could go Capital assets acquisition and construction are not wrong: properly planned, budgeted or recorded accurately in the accounting system.

Not comply with Governmental Accounting Standard Board (GASB) requirements.

Page 40: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

40

Capitalization UsefulAmount Life

Land Improvements $5,000 to $25,000 10 to 40 yearsBuildings 10,000 to 50,000 10 to 50 yearsBuilding Improvements 25,000 15 yearsPhone system 10,000 15 yearsEquipment 5,000 3 to 15 yearsVehicles 5,000 to 20,000 3 to 20 years

InfrastructureRoad network 50,000 40 to 50 yearsSewers 25,000 50 yearsParking lots 10,000 40 yearsSidewalk 10,000 25 years

Expenditures – Drill-Down

Capital Assets & Capital Projects Fund (continued)

Control: Five-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Capital improvements that are included in the adopted balanced budgeted identifies sources to fund the approved capital assets.Capitalization threshold guidelines:

Page 41: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

41

Expenditures – Drill-Down

Pension Trust FundsWhat could go Annual required pension contributions not fully funded. wrong: Investments are not adequately performing and safe-

guarded from market fluctuations and significant losses.

Control: Actuarial valuations are performed annually, though the Commonwealth (Act 205) requires only biennial valuations. An independent investment consultant, PFM Advisors, is retained to provide professional advice and a Pension Investment Advisory Board, a volunteer board of three highly credentialed residents, oversees the work of the investment consultant and recommends investment policy and other related issues to the Commission

As of January 1, 2007, the date of the most recent actuarial report, assets in the plans exceed the actuarial accrued liabilities by $4,673,000.

Page 42: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

42

Expenditures – Drill-Down

Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB)

What could go Annual required pension contributions not fully funded.

wrong: Investments are not adequately performing and safeguarded from market fluctuations and significant losses.

Control: GASB 45 statement is effective for Mt. Lebanon beginning in 2008. However, the municipality contracted for an actuarial report as of January 1, 2005 and began budgeting to fund the OPEB obligation in 2006.

IMCA-RC has been chosen to administer the assets. Investments within the ICMA-RC Trust are chosen by the Pension Investment Advisory Board, a volunteer board of three highly credentialed residents.

Page 43: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

43

Expenditures – Drill-Down

Capital Assessment Fund

What could go Developers could construct projects not in accordance with wrong: developer agreements and municipal approvals or could fail

to complete projects in accordance with developer agreements and municipal improvements.

Control: Appropriate deposits, payments, inspection fees and performance bonds are received and maintained to ensure compliance. These procedures are strictly monitored

through the planning and finance departments.

Page 44: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

44

Expenditures – Drill-Down

State Highway Aid Fund (Liquid Fuels)What could go Annual revenues are not received due to incorrect filings or wrong: are limited due to ineligible expenditures.

Control: On an annual basis, the finance department applies estimated State Highway Aid funding to eligible costs. Documentation for allowable expenditures and contracts are maintained to present to the annual State Highway Aid

audit preformed by the Pennsylvania State Auditor General’s Office.

The public works department and municipal engineer work closely with the finance department and Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PENNDOT) to ensure bid contracts are eligible and approved per the State Highway Aid funding guidelines

Page 45: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

45

Expenditures – Drill-Down

Sewage Fund

What could go Resources are not adequate to comply with the wrong: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) consent decree

for necessary sewer infrastructure work.

Receipts may not be received and recorded properly.

Control: The sewage service rate was increased in 2007 from $2.45 to $4.05 per thousand gallons.

The capital bond issue includes $1.6 million for catch-up infrastructure work related to the federally mandated EPA consent decree requirements.

Page 46: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

46

Expenditures – Drill-Down

Sewage Fund (continued)Control: ALCOSAN provides quarterly billing information which is compared

to the PAWC records for reasonable accuracy. On an annual basis total consumption billed by ALCOSAN is compared to the total consumption of the water company for reasonableness.Compare total usage with the same period for the prior year. On a monthly basis, sewage collections are reconciled to collections reports. On an annual basis, formal lien proceedings are applied to outstanding sewage payments.Regular meetings with the municipal engineer who provides forecasts for future capital sewage projects.

Lastly, the municipality reports all outstanding payments due to us on the municipal claims letter.

Page 47: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

47

Lessons learned

It takes time, planning, preparation and commitment.

Need support of upper management, directors and staff.

Great internal control analysis and evaluation.

Allows you to see where you are strong and areas that need strengthened to limit risk exposure.

Page 48: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

48

Lessons learned

It provided a report card of our performance:– Good policies + procedures = limited risks.

Roadmap to identify areas to improve:– Some processes may call for the development or revision of

policies to ensure risk is mitigated.

End product was worth the time and effort.

Page 49: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

49

Risk Assessment Philosophy & Conclusion

We all have a special duty to the public to ensure that a government’s resources are properly managed. Good management requires the maintenance of sound internal controls to protect all municipal resources.

We recognize that management is primarily responsible for designing, implementing, monitoring and reporting on controls and effective internal controls continues to be a top management priority.

Page 50: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

50

Risk Assessment Philosophy & Conclusion

Internal controls are essential but not foolproof – costs should not exceed benefits and no control structure can absolutely prevent all fraud, abuse and irregularities.

Our approach is to establish sound policies, efficient procedures and continually strengthen controls that reduce these risks. We believe our control structure is a deterrent to fraud and losses and increases the likelihood of detecting irregularities.

We will continue to develop and monitor internal controls to safeguard our assets and ensure they are utilized in the most effective and efficient manner.

Page 51: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

51

Risk Assessment Philosophy & Conclusion

Mt. Lebanon acknowledges the risk assessment process is an ongoing one. Internal and external threats constantly develop, presenting new hazards to our government. Change itself is a risk, and we know we must continually adapt our policies and procedures to manage the changing risks to an appropriate comfort level.

It is important to take lessons learned each year and apply them to the preparation of each subsequent audit in order to make better risk assessments and develop responses to identify risks.

Page 52: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

52

Risk Assessment Philosophy & Conclusion

Now more than ever, citizens are demanding the very highest level of accountability from government officials for their stewardship of public resources.

We accept and embrace the challenge to protect, properly manage and be accountable for the resources in our care.

Page 53: Mt. Lebanon, Pennsylvania  Risk Assessment

53

Mt. Lebanon Risk Assessment

• Thank You!

• Questions?