MSD Project 13022
description
Transcript of MSD Project 13022
MSD PROJECT 13022VAD BREAKAWAY POWER
System Level Design ReviewJoe Tartakoff Customer/Graduate Consultant [email protected]
Matthew Myers ISE Project Leader [email protected]
Nick Dominesey ME Lead Engineer [email protected]
Jason Inman EE Team Member [email protected]
Chris Smith ME Team Member [email protected]
Ellie Sanford ME Team Member [email protected]
Michael Edson EE Team Member [email protected]
Agenda1. Project Overview2. Customer Needs and Engineering
Specifications3. Chosen Concept4. Block Diagram5. Feasibility Analysis6. Testing Plan7. Work Breakdown Structure8. System Design Proposal9. Bill of Materials
MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 2
Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013
Project Background 6-10% of all people worldwide over the
age of 65 will develop heart failure. There are 287,000 deaths per year due to
heart failure in the US. The Thoratec Heartmate II Left Ventricular
Assist Device (LVAD) is a bridge-to-transplant device that assists the heart, pumping blood throughout the body for those who are awaiting a heart transplant.
MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 3
Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013
Present LVAD External Power
http://www.thoratec.com/MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 4
Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013
Project Summary The transcutaneous power cord that
connects the implanted device to the external motor control unit is often a source of infection.
The cord is only about 1 foot long so it doesn’t catch on things.
When the unit is dropped, the skin around the cord tears and becomes infected.
MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 5
Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013
Project Objectives Create a breakaway port for power cable that
will detach with a certain amount of force. Cable port is implanted where the cable leaves the
bodyIncrease flexibility of cable and reduce stress on
surrounding skin Create an internal power supply and motor
control unit for the pump when the cord becomes disconnected. Backup power should last long enough for the
patient to seek assistance if something goes wrong
MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 6
Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013
Customer NeedsImportance: 3=high,2=medium,1=low
MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 7
Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013
Engineering Specs
MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 8
Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013
Needs and Specs
MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 9
Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013
MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 10
Notes Is CN2 a redundant statement of CN1 and therefore
unnecessary? Wouldn’t a reduction of inflammation be accomplished by reduced the force on the port?
CN5 is something that we may not be able to test or implement. Therefore, is it necessary?
CN10 sounds like something that’s left up to the surgeons. We can’t really test or implement this in a practical manner…
CN12 is being removed because it is not our concern. We will assume that there is no fluid or that there are existing methods that can be implemented to solve the situation.
S11 may be removed because it may be completely unnecessary and we can’t test for it.
S2 is may not be considered a concern due to physical observations of the current cord.
Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013
Chosen Concept
MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 11
Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013
Note: One of the electrical methods has changed. I believe it is under “Manage Switchover” > “Pump Control Switchover” > changed to “External to Internal Relay”
Block Diagram
MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 12
Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013
Note: Some of the numbers of wires have been reduced.
MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 13
Specs vs Subcomponents
Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013
Force Pull Test on SkinAngle of
Disconnect Force (N) Displacement of skin (mm) Feeling Assessment Comments
90 degrees
1 1 light 2 5 medium
2.5 10 med-heavy 3 10 heavy
3.5 12 too heavy 4 15 too heavy
45 degrees
1 - light
2 - light-med. reasonable disconnect
3 - medium upper limit4 - med-heavy 5 - heavy
0 degrees
1 - very light barely feel it
2 - light reasonable disconnect
3 - medium upper limit4 - med-heavy 5 - heavy
MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 14
Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013
Explain why upper and lower limits, and angle were chosen.
MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 15
Heat Analysis - Assumptions Body Temperature (Environment) is 37˚C Heat distribution on outside of device will
be modeled via FEA Heat transfer method inside body is
conduction All energy inefficiencies result in heat
generation Device is surrounded my muscle tissue
which is at equilibrium between perfusion and heat generation
Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013
MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 16
Heat Analysis – Additional 1D Assumptions 1 dimension normal to the skin Uniform heat generation Constant Properties Body is at equilibrium (neglect heat
generation effects) Steady State
Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013
MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 17
Heat Analysis - Data Reference Temperatures[C]: Body Temp= 37 C Ambient Air Temp= 25 C
Conduction Coefficients : Internal Organs and Muscle = 0.500 W/m*K Skin and Fat=0.300 W/m*K Titanium=19.000 W/m*K (P13022 only) Clothing=0.029 W/m*K
Convection Coefficients [W/m*K]: Air=10.000
Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013
MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 18
Heat Analysis – Critical ValuesThe purpose of our thermal model is to
ensure this device will not harm the patient.
With a factor of safety of 2, our maximum heat flux through the tissue is 40mW/cm2
Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013
MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 19
Heat Analysis – 1D Analysis ModelDetailed Design Review 2/8/2013
MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 20
Heat Analysis - Results
25 30 35 40 45 50 550
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5Heat Generation vs. Device Temperature at Contact
Hea
t Ene
rgy,
q (W
)
Temperature, T (C)
Q/Tair CurveHeat Dissipated to AirQ/Tbody CurveHeat Dissipated to BodyTotal Heat Dissipation
25 30 35 40 45 50 550
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8Heat Flux vs. Device Temperature at Contact
Hea
t Ene
rgy,
q (m
W/c
m2)
Temperature, T (C)
Q/Tair CurveHeat Flux Dissipated to AirQ/Tbody CurveHeat Flux Dissipated to BodyTotal Heat Flux Dissipation -0.04 -0.03 -0.02 -0.01 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04
20
25
30
35
40
45Temperature Distribution
Distance across device, [m]
Tempe
rature [C
]
q=0.0Wq=0.1Wq=0.2Wq=0.3Wq=0.4Wq=0.5W
Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013
MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 21
Heat Analysis – Engineering Model
Conduction
Internal Environment(Abdomen Muscle)
Device
Boundary Temp: 37˚C
•The Device will be implanted in abdomen muscle•Assuming a worst case scenario, the device will be surrounded by muscle tissue in all directions for an “infinite” thickness.•An ANSYS model which includes the boundary temperature of 37˚C and all muscle properties will show worst case temperature and flux conditions
Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013
MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 22
Heat Analysis - Summary For the given area of 64cm2 , 0.3 W
(4.67mW/cm2) of heat generation will be dissipated before exceeding 40oC.
For a surface area of 340cm2 we should be allowed to generate up to 13.6 W of heat energy within the device.
Expected worst case heat generation = 2 W.
Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013
MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 23
Heat Analysis - Conclusion The Internal Battery Storage Device is not likely to
harm the body through heat generation based upon the of energy flux through the total surface area.
Further analysis will be conducted (in ANSYS) to confirm the results.
Due to the extreme difficulty of finding a relatively accurate model for the body in relation to the LVAD system, the 1-D analysis is only useful for worst case results and only provide limited useful data.
Further analysis in ANSYS should provide more reliable results.
Development of the P13022 device should continue with minimal design change.
Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013
MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 24
Testing PlanDetailed Design Review 2/8/2013
MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 25
Work Breakdown Structure
Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013
MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 26
System Model Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013
System Model (sketch)
MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 27
Existing Batteries
Breakaway Port
External Signal
Controller
Internal Pump(Thoratec Heartmate 2)
Internal Signal Controller & Batteries
External Pump Monitor
Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013
Internal Power Control (sketch)
MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 28
Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013
Breakaway Port Design
MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 29
Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013
MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 30
Bill of MaterialsMaterial: Quantity: Price per unit: Total cost: Comments:
Batteries 8 $3.50 $28.00
LiFePO4 18650 Rechargeable Cell: 3.2V 1500 mAh, 4.5A Rate, 4.32Wh, UL Listed, UN Approved (NDGR) Part Number: LFP-
18650-1500
Polycarbonate/Acrylic 1 $0.00 $0.00 Old scrap piece will be used unless more models needs to be made.
motor controller design board 1 $300.00 $300.00 used to design the motor controller
Bio-compatable titanuim roundstock 1 $23.10 $23.10
For implant 1.25"D X 1.00"L http://www.onlinemetals.com/merchant.cfm?pid=6776&step=4&showunits=inches&id=18
7&top_cat=0
Recharge Board 1 $6.45 $6.45PCB (Protection circuit module) for 4 cells (12.8V) LiFePO4 Battery Part Number:
PCB-LFP12.8V2A
Surgical tubing 1 $30.39 $30.39 http://www.amazon.com/Latex-Rubber-Surgical-Tubing-39323932/dp/B0045V36PQ
Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013
MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 31
Bill of Materials (cont’d)Material: Quantity: Price per unit: Total cost: Comments:
Wire 1 $13.15 $13.15 100ft, 16 gauge wire
Magnets 5 $1.00 $5.00
Microcontroller 2 $20.00 $40.00
Relay 1 $17.19 $17.19
Resistors $0.00
Capacitors $0.00
Thermocouple $0.00
Connectors $0.00
PBC board 1 $50.00 $50.00
Vibrating motor 2 $3.99 $7.98 28821-nd
10-pin connector $0.00
Total: $463.28
Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013
System Model (sketch)
Hanzlik in 20 years.
MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 32
I love my new breakaway
port system!
Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013