MSD Project 13022

32
MSD PROJECT 13022 VAD BREAKAWAY POWER System Level Design Review Joe Tartakoff Customer/Graduate Consultant [email protected] Matthew Myers ISE Project Leader [email protected] Nick Dominesey ME Lead Engineer [email protected] Jason Inman EE Team Member [email protected] Chris Smith ME Team Member [email protected] Ellie Sanford ME Team Member [email protected] Michael Edson EE Team Member [email protected]

description

VAD BREAKAWAY POWER. System Level Design Review. MSD Project 13022. Detailed Design Review 2 /8/2013. Agenda. Project Overview Customer Needs and Engineering Specifications Chosen Concept Block Diagram Feasibility Analysis Testing Plan Work Breakdown Structure - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of MSD Project 13022

Page 1: MSD Project 13022

MSD PROJECT 13022VAD BREAKAWAY POWER

System Level Design ReviewJoe Tartakoff Customer/Graduate Consultant [email protected]

Matthew Myers ISE Project Leader [email protected]

Nick Dominesey ME Lead Engineer [email protected]

Jason Inman EE Team Member [email protected]

Chris Smith ME Team Member [email protected]

Ellie Sanford ME Team Member [email protected]

Michael Edson EE Team Member [email protected]

Page 2: MSD Project 13022

Agenda1. Project Overview2. Customer Needs and Engineering

Specifications3. Chosen Concept4. Block Diagram5. Feasibility Analysis6. Testing Plan7. Work Breakdown Structure8. System Design Proposal9. Bill of Materials

MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 2

Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013

Page 3: MSD Project 13022

Project Background 6-10% of all people worldwide over the

age of 65 will develop heart failure. There are 287,000 deaths per year due to

heart failure in the US. The Thoratec Heartmate II Left Ventricular

Assist Device (LVAD) is a bridge-to-transplant device that assists the heart, pumping blood throughout the body for those who are awaiting a heart transplant.

MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 3

Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013

Page 4: MSD Project 13022

Present LVAD External Power

http://www.thoratec.com/MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 4

Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013

Page 5: MSD Project 13022

Project Summary The transcutaneous power cord that

connects the implanted device to the external motor control unit is often a source of infection.

The cord is only about 1 foot long so it doesn’t catch on things.

When the unit is dropped, the skin around the cord tears and becomes infected.

MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 5

Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013

Page 6: MSD Project 13022

Project Objectives Create a breakaway port for power cable that

will detach with a certain amount of force. Cable port is implanted where the cable leaves the

bodyIncrease flexibility of cable and reduce stress on

surrounding skin Create an internal power supply and motor

control unit for the pump when the cord becomes disconnected. Backup power should last long enough for the

patient to seek assistance if something goes wrong

MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 6

Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013

Page 7: MSD Project 13022

Customer NeedsImportance: 3=high,2=medium,1=low

MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 7

Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013

Page 8: MSD Project 13022

Engineering Specs

MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 8

Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013

Page 9: MSD Project 13022

Needs and Specs

MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 9

Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013

Page 10: MSD Project 13022

MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 10

Notes Is CN2 a redundant statement of CN1 and therefore

unnecessary? Wouldn’t a reduction of inflammation be accomplished by reduced the force on the port?

CN5 is something that we may not be able to test or implement. Therefore, is it necessary?

CN10 sounds like something that’s left up to the surgeons. We can’t really test or implement this in a practical manner…

CN12 is being removed because it is not our concern. We will assume that there is no fluid or that there are existing methods that can be implemented to solve the situation.

S11 may be removed because it may be completely unnecessary and we can’t test for it.

S2 is may not be considered a concern due to physical observations of the current cord.

Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013

Page 11: MSD Project 13022

Chosen Concept

MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 11

Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013

Note: One of the electrical methods has changed. I believe it is under “Manage Switchover” > “Pump Control Switchover” > changed to “External to Internal Relay”

Page 12: MSD Project 13022

Block Diagram

MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 12

Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013

Note: Some of the numbers of wires have been reduced.

Page 13: MSD Project 13022

MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 13

Specs vs Subcomponents

Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013

Page 14: MSD Project 13022

Force Pull Test on SkinAngle of

Disconnect Force (N) Displacement of skin (mm) Feeling Assessment Comments

90 degrees

1 1 light  2 5 medium  

2.5 10 med-heavy  3 10 heavy  

3.5 12 too heavy  4 15 too heavy  

45 degrees

1 - light  

2 - light-med. reasonable disconnect

3 - medium upper limit4 - med-heavy  5 - heavy  

0 degrees

1 - very light barely feel it

2 - light reasonable disconnect

3 - medium upper limit4 - med-heavy  5 - heavy  

MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 14

Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013

Explain why upper and lower limits, and angle were chosen.

Page 15: MSD Project 13022

MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 15

Heat Analysis - Assumptions Body Temperature (Environment) is 37˚C Heat distribution on outside of device will

be modeled via FEA Heat transfer method inside body is

conduction All energy inefficiencies result in heat

generation Device is surrounded my muscle tissue

which is at equilibrium between perfusion and heat generation

Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013

Page 16: MSD Project 13022

MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 16

Heat Analysis – Additional 1D Assumptions 1 dimension normal to the skin Uniform heat generation Constant Properties Body is at equilibrium (neglect heat

generation effects) Steady State

Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013

Page 17: MSD Project 13022

MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 17

Heat Analysis - Data Reference Temperatures[C]: Body Temp= 37 C Ambient Air Temp= 25 C

Conduction Coefficients : Internal Organs and Muscle = 0.500 W/m*K Skin and Fat=0.300 W/m*K Titanium=19.000 W/m*K (P13022 only) Clothing=0.029 W/m*K

Convection Coefficients [W/m*K]: Air=10.000

Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013

Page 18: MSD Project 13022

MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 18

Heat Analysis – Critical ValuesThe purpose of our thermal model is to

ensure this device will not harm the patient.

With a factor of safety of 2, our maximum heat flux through the tissue is 40mW/cm2

Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013

Page 19: MSD Project 13022

MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 19

Heat Analysis – 1D Analysis ModelDetailed Design Review 2/8/2013

Page 20: MSD Project 13022

MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 20

Heat Analysis - Results

25 30 35 40 45 50 550

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

0.5Heat Generation vs. Device Temperature at Contact

Hea

t Ene

rgy,

q (W

)

Temperature, T (C)

Q/Tair CurveHeat Dissipated to AirQ/Tbody CurveHeat Dissipated to BodyTotal Heat Dissipation

25 30 35 40 45 50 550

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8Heat Flux vs. Device Temperature at Contact

Hea

t Ene

rgy,

q (m

W/c

m2)

Temperature, T (C)

Q/Tair CurveHeat Flux Dissipated to AirQ/Tbody CurveHeat Flux Dissipated to BodyTotal Heat Flux Dissipation -0.04 -0.03 -0.02 -0.01 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04

20

25

30

35

40

45Temperature Distribution

Distance across device, [m]

Tempe

rature [C

]

q=0.0Wq=0.1Wq=0.2Wq=0.3Wq=0.4Wq=0.5W

Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013

Page 21: MSD Project 13022

MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 21

Heat Analysis – Engineering Model

Conduction

Internal Environment(Abdomen Muscle)

Device

Boundary Temp: 37˚C

•The Device will be implanted in abdomen muscle•Assuming a worst case scenario, the device will be surrounded by muscle tissue in all directions for an “infinite” thickness.•An ANSYS model which includes the boundary temperature of 37˚C and all muscle properties will show worst case temperature and flux conditions

Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013

Page 22: MSD Project 13022

MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 22

Heat Analysis - Summary For the given area of 64cm2 , 0.3 W

(4.67mW/cm2) of heat generation will be dissipated before exceeding 40oC.

For a surface area of 340cm2 we should be allowed to generate up to 13.6 W of heat energy within the device.

Expected worst case heat generation = 2 W.

Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013

Page 23: MSD Project 13022

MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 23

Heat Analysis - Conclusion The Internal Battery Storage Device is not likely to

harm the body through heat generation based upon the of energy flux through the total surface area.

Further analysis will be conducted (in ANSYS) to confirm the results.

Due to the extreme difficulty of finding a relatively accurate model for the body in relation to the LVAD system, the 1-D analysis is only useful for worst case results and only provide limited useful data.

Further analysis in ANSYS should provide more reliable results.

Development of the P13022 device should continue with minimal design change.

Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013

Page 24: MSD Project 13022

MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 24

Testing PlanDetailed Design Review 2/8/2013

Page 25: MSD Project 13022

MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 25

Work Breakdown Structure

Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013

Page 26: MSD Project 13022

MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 26

System Model Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013

Page 27: MSD Project 13022

System Model (sketch)

MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 27

Existing Batteries

Breakaway Port

External Signal

Controller

Internal Pump(Thoratec Heartmate 2)

Internal Signal Controller & Batteries

External Pump Monitor

Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013

Page 28: MSD Project 13022

Internal Power Control (sketch)

MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 28

Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013

Page 29: MSD Project 13022

Breakaway Port Design

MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 29

Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013

Page 30: MSD Project 13022

MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 30

Bill of MaterialsMaterial: Quantity: Price per unit: Total cost: Comments:

Batteries 8 $3.50 $28.00

LiFePO4 18650 Rechargeable Cell: 3.2V 1500 mAh, 4.5A Rate, 4.32Wh, UL Listed, UN Approved (NDGR) Part Number: LFP-

18650-1500

Polycarbonate/Acrylic 1 $0.00 $0.00 Old scrap piece will be used unless more models needs to be made.

motor controller design board 1 $300.00 $300.00 used to design the motor controller

Bio-compatable titanuim roundstock 1 $23.10 $23.10

For implant 1.25"D X 1.00"L http://www.onlinemetals.com/merchant.cfm?pid=6776&step=4&showunits=inches&id=18

7&top_cat=0

Recharge Board 1 $6.45 $6.45PCB (Protection circuit module) for 4 cells (12.8V) LiFePO4 Battery Part Number:

PCB-LFP12.8V2A

Surgical tubing 1 $30.39 $30.39 http://www.amazon.com/Latex-Rubber-Surgical-Tubing-39323932/dp/B0045V36PQ

Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013

Page 31: MSD Project 13022

MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 31

Bill of Materials (cont’d)Material: Quantity: Price per unit: Total cost: Comments:

Wire 1 $13.15 $13.15 100ft, 16 gauge wire

Magnets 5 $1.00 $5.00  

Microcontroller 2 $20.00 $40.00  

Relay 1 $17.19 $17.19  

Resistors     $0.00  

Capacitors     $0.00  

Thermocouple     $0.00  

Connectors     $0.00  

PBC board 1 $50.00 $50.00  

Vibrating motor 2 $3.99 $7.98 28821-nd

10-pin connector     $0.00  

Total:     $463.28  

Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013

Page 32: MSD Project 13022

System Model (sketch)

Hanzlik in 20 years.

MSD Project 13022: Breakaway VAD 32

I love my new breakaway

port system!

Detailed Design Review 2/8/2013