Mr. Kokkotis Panagiotis - H00177171_presentation
-
Upload
panagiotis-kokkotis -
Category
Documents
-
view
103 -
download
1
Transcript of Mr. Kokkotis Panagiotis - H00177171_presentation
1
Comparative Analysis of Energy Storage Methods in Smart Grids with Distributed Energy Production. An Approach for Micro Grids to Medium Size
Grids.
Student: Kokkotis Panagiotis – H00177171Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Psomopoulos Constantinos
September 2015
2
Introduction
3
Introduction
Makansi et al., 2002
4
Introduction
5
OutlineAnalysis of
ESSESS
ParametersElectric Power
Systems
ESS Comparison
Implementation on Tilos Island
Faults Issues
Discussion Conclusions
6
Electric Power Systems (1/3)Generation• Lignite fired power plants• Natural gas power plants• Hydro plants• Nuclear plants• Diesel oil plants• RES
Transmission• Includes
• High Voltage Network• Couplings• Step Down Transformers
• Operates in HV. leading to lower losses
• P=I*V, thus increasing Voltage. Lowers current
Distribution• Includes
• Power lines• Step Down Transformers
• Losses are about 30% more than in Transmission
• Extensive Network• Aerial (cheaper. faster fault treatment)• Underground (when limited space.
aesthetics)
University of Idaho
7
Electric Power Systems (2/3)Faults in Networks• Short Circuits• On Motors• On Generators• Phase opposition• Over voltage due to lighting strike• Switching surges• Overloads• Reversal of flow• Voltage Variation
Switchgear• Oil• Air• Gas (SF6)• Hybrid• Vacuum• Carbon Dioxide
Source: www.flir.com
8
Electric Power Systems (3/3)Connection to MV must strictly follow these guidelines:• Voltage difference must be between ±10%
of the nominal• Frequency difference must be between
±0.5Hz of the nominal• Polar angle must be between ±10 o
Installations must be equipped with local or remote decouplers and switches
9
Energy Storage Systems (1/5)
• Battery Energy Storage• Lead-Acid• Nickel• Sodium-sulfur• Lithium• Metal-air
• Flow Battery• Superconducting
Magnetic • Super Capacitor
Electrochemical energy
• Compressed Air• Liquid Air or Cryogenic• Hydro and Pumped Hydro• Flywheel
Mechanical energy
• HydrogenChemical energy
• Sensible Heat• Latent Heat• Thermochemical
Thermal energy
10
Energy Storage Systems (2/5)
11
Energy Storage Systems (3/5)
Source: ESA
12
Energy Storage Systems (4/5) Power Rating (MW) Discharge
Duration (h)Self-Discharge
per daySuitable Storage
Duration
Energy Density (Wh/kg)
Energy Density (Wh/L)
Power Density (W/kg)
CAES 1-400 2-100 Small Hours-Months 30-60 3-6
Flywheel 0.002-20 s-15m 100% seconds-minutes 5-130 20-80 400-1600
Fuel Cell 0.000001-50 s-24+ Almost Zero Hours-Months 600-1200 500-3000 5-500
Lead-Acid 0.001-50 h 0.1-0.3% Minutes-Days 30-50 50-80 75-300
Li-ion 0.1-50 0.1-5 0.1-0.3% Minutes-Days 75-250 200-600 100-5000
Metal-Air 0.02-10 3-4 Very Small Hours-Months 110-3000 500-10000
NaS 0.05-34 5-8 ~20% Seconds-hours 150-240 150-240 150-230
Ni-Cd 0-46 s-h 0.2-0.6% Minutes-Days 50-75 60-150 150-230
NiMH 0.01-Several MW s-h 30-110 140-435 250-2000
PHES 100-5000 10-100 Very Small Hours-Months 0.5-15 0.5-1.5
SMES 0.01-10 s Almost Zero Hours-Months 0.5-5 0.2-2.5 500-2000
Sodium Nickel Chloride (Zebra) 0.001-1 min-8h ~15% Seconds-hours 100-140 150-280 130-245
SuperCaps 0.001-10 s 20-40% Seconds-hours 0.05-30 10000+ 50-5000+
TES 0.1-300 1-24+ 0.5-1% Minutes-Days 80-250 50-500 10-30
VRB 0.005-1.5 s-8h 10-75 15-33
ZnBr 0.025-1 s-4h Small Hours-Months 60-85 30-60 50-150
13
Energy Storage Systems (5/5) Efficiency
(%)Durability
(years) Durability (Cycles) Capital cost ($/kW)
capital cost ($/kWh)
Tech Maturity (1-lower to 5-higher) Availability (%)
CAES 40-80 20-100 30000+ 400-800 2-50 5 65-96
Flywheel 80-99 15-20 1000000 250-350 1000-5000 4 99.9+
Fuel Cell 20-70 5-15 1000-10000 10000+ 6000-20000 2 90
Lead-Acid 70-92 5-15 500-1200 300-600 200-400 5 99.997
Li-ion 85-90 5-20 1000-10000 1200-4000 600-2500 4 97+
Metal-Air 40-60 100-300 100-250 10-60 1
NaS 75-90 15 2000-5000 1000-3000 300-500 4 99.98
Ni-Cd 60-70 5-20 1000-2500 500-1500 800-1500 4 99+
NiMH 60-66 3-15 200-1500 4 99+
PHES 70-87 40-100 12000-30000+ 600-2000 5-100 5 95+
SMES 85-99 20+ 100000+ 200-300 1000-10000 3 99.9+
Sodium Nickel Chloride (Zebra) ~90 8-14 2500-3000 150-300 100-200 4 99.9+
SuperCaps 97+ 20+ 1000000+ 100-300 300-2000 3 99.9+
TES 30-60 10-40 2000-14600 200-300 3-60 3-4 90
VRB 65-85 10-20 13000+ 600-1500 150-1000 3 96-99
ZnBr 75-80 5-20 ~2000 700-2500 150-1000 2 94
Compiled Data by the Author
14
Case Study; Tilos Island (1/14)
Source: Google Maps Source: Wikipedia
15
Case Study; Tilos Island (2/14)
16
Case Study; Tilos Island (3/14)
Source: SEA Lab, TEI-P, 2015
17
Case Study; Tilos Island (4/14)
18
Case Study; Tilos Island (5/14)04
.04.
15
06.0
4.15
07
.04.
15
08.0
4.15
10
.04.
15
11.0
4.15
13
.04.
15
14.0
4.15
15
.04.
15
17.0
4.15
18
.04.
15
19.0
4.15
21
.04.
15
22.0
4.15
24
.04.
15
25.0
4.15
26
.04.
15
28.0
4.15
29
.04.
15
30.0
4.15
02
.05.
15
03.0
5.15
05
.05.
15
06.0
5.15
07
.05.
15
09.0
5.15
10
.05.
15
11.0
5.15
13
.05.
15
14.0
5.15
16
.05.
15
17.0
5.15
18
.05.
15
20.0
5.15
21
.05.
15
22.0
5.15
24
.05.
15
25.0
5.15
27
.05.
15
28.0
5.15
29
.05.
15
31.0
5.15
01
.06.
15
02.0
6.15
04
.06.
15
05.0
6.15
07
.06.
15
08.0
6.15
09
.06.
15
11.0
6.15
12
.06.
15
13.0
6.15
15
.06.
15
16.0
6.15
0
60
120
180
240
300
360
420
480
540
600
Load Measurements_Tilos (4/4/2015 to 17/6/2015)
Date
Load
Dem
and
(kW
)
Source: SEA Lab, TEI-P, 2015
19
Case Study; Tilos Island (5/14)04
.04.
15
06.0
4.15
07
.04.
15
08.0
4.15
10
.04.
15
11.0
4.15
13
.04.
15
14.0
4.15
15
.04.
15
17.0
4.15
18
.04.
15
19.0
4.15
21
.04.
15
22.0
4.15
24
.04.
15
25.0
4.15
26
.04.
15
28.0
4.15
29
.04.
15
30.0
4.15
02
.05.
15
03.0
5.15
05
.05.
15
06.0
5.15
07
.05.
15
09.0
5.15
10
.05.
15
11.0
5.15
13
.05.
15
14.0
5.15
16
.05.
15
17.0
5.15
18
.05.
15
20.0
5.15
21
.05.
15
22.0
5.15
24
.05.
15
25.0
5.15
27
.05.
15
28.0
5.15
29
.05.
15
31.0
5.15
01
.06.
15
02.0
6.15
04
.06.
15
05.0
6.15
07
.06.
15
08.0
6.15
09
.06.
15
11.0
6.15
12
.06.
15
13.0
6.15
15
.06.
15
16.0
6.15
0
60
120
180
240
300
360
420
480
540
600
Load Measurements_Tilos (4/4/2015 to 17/6/2015)
Date
Load
Dem
and
(kW
)
20
Case Study; Tilos Island (6/14)
0:00 2:24 4:48 7:12 9:36 12:00 14:24 16:48 19:12 21:36 0:000
100200300400
16.04.15 (M1)
Time (HH:MM)
Pow
er (k
W)
0:00 2:24 4:48 7:12 9:36 12:00 14:24 16:48 19:12 21:36 0:000
50
100
150
16.04.15 (M2)
Time (HH:MM)
Pow
er (k
W)
21
Case Study; Tilos Island (6/14)
0:00 2:24 4:48 7:12 9:36 12:00 14:24 16:48 19:12 21:36 0:000
100200300400
16.04.15 (M1)
Time (HH:MM)
Pow
er (k
W)
0:00 2:24 4:48 7:12 9:36 12:00 14:24 16:48 19:12 21:36 0:000
50
100
150
16.04.15 (M2)
Time (HH:MM)
Pow
er (k
W)
22
Case Study; Tilos Island (7/14)
11:48 11:51 11:54 11:57 12:00 12:02 12:05 12:08 12:110
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Energy "lost"
Time (HH:MM:SS)
Pow
er (k
W)
23
Case Study; Tilos Island (7/14)
24
Case Study; Tilos Island (8/14)
Time kVAkW
kVAkW
87% 87%
11:50
M1
245.11 213.25
M2
99.25 86.34
12:00 0 0 0 0
12:10 353.47 307.52 132.75 115.49
25
Case Study; Tilos Island (8/14)
lostPower before blackout+Power after blackoutE *Time
2
Therefore, for M1 we have:
M1 M1 M1lost lost lost
213.246 307.522 1198secE * E 260.384kW*0.33h E 85.93kWh2 3600sec/ h
And for M2, accordingly:
M2 M2lost lost
86.343 115.494 1198secE * E 33.3kWh2 3600sec/ h
Time kVAkW
kVAkW
87% 87%
11:50
M1
245.11 213.25
M2
99.25 86.34
12:00 0 0 0 0
12:10 353.47 307.52 132.75 115.49
26
Case Study; Tilos Island (9/14)Load Needs during Measured Period
M1 (kWh) M2 (kWh)
16.04.2015 85.93 33.3
25-26.04.2015 245.55 66.7
30.04.15 (1) 68.69 27.69
30.04.15 (2) 88.06 31.67
12.05.15 171.35 70.02
24.05.15 479.62 184.83
29.05.15 1522.64 631.82
Maximum 1522.64 631.82
Average 380.26 149.43
Minimum 68.69 27.69
Average Time w/o Power: 80 min
Average Power Provided:• M1: 276.89 kW• M2: 110.52 kW• M1-M2: 166.37 kW
Energy that must be provided: 276.89 kW*1.33 h ≈ 370 kWh
27
Case Study; Tilos Island (10/14)
Can provide 50kW for
35 min (30 kWh),
configurable to
160kW for 5 min
(13 kWh)
Source: Beacon Power, 2015
28
Case Study; Tilos Island (11/14)
Can provide
60kW/300kWh
Source: Prudent Energy, 2015
29
Case Study; Tilos Island (12/14)
Transformers 1 & 2 have the following characteristics:• One of 250kVA (1) and one of 160kVA (2)• 20kV Primary Voltage• 230V/400V Secondary Voltage• 24kV HV insulation level• No load losses of 300W and 210W respectively• Load losses of 2350W and 1700W respectively
Tran
sfor
mer
s
Source: Schneider Electric
30
Case Study; Tilos Island (13/14)
Switchgear has the following characteristics:• Rated Voltage: 24 kV• Power Frequency withstand voltage 50Hz-1 min: 50 kV rms• Lightning impulse withstand voltage 1.2/50 μs: 125 kV peak• Short circuit breaking current (Peak/Ik max): 63-80/25-31.5 (kA)• Busbar rated current: 1600 A• Incoming/Outgoing rated current: 1600 A• Internal Arc Classification: 31.5 kA/1s
Switc
hgea
r
Source: Schneider Electric
31
Case Study; Tilos Island (14/14)Ci
rcui
t Bre
aker
s
Circuit Breakers have the following characteristics:• Rated Voltage: 24 kV• Power Frequency withstand voltage 50 Hz - 1 min: 50 kV rms• Lightning impulse withstand voltage 1.2/50 μs: 125 kV peak• Rated Current: 2500 A• Short-time withstand Current: 31.5 kA/3s
Source: Schneider Electric
32
Discussion• A smart grid is an intelligent electricity network that is balancing
all the variables associated with dynamic load control powered by an ever increasing variable of RES
• A bidirectional communication between the consumer and the producer makes the T&D network an active component
• For the balancing act to take place, small amounts of energy should be introduced throughout the network
• This energy may come from a variety of Energy Storage Systems, as analyzed in this dissertation
• A smart grid has to be versatile and fully support the weak and fragile network, that is why a Hybrid Energy Storage System is proposed for Tilos
33
Conclusions• Each and every Energy Storage System has unique characteristics• One should follow a step-by-step guide when selecting an Energy
Storage System• Current infrastructure is a major issue and studying it before
implementing a HESS is a must• Load profiling the area in which the smart grid is about to be
installed is a major step towards reading the needs of the grid• Transformers, circuit breakers, switchgear and other electronic
devices play a vital role in the grid
34
Future Work• Further studying of the core electronics• Electric Power Networks and HESS profile must be intertwined in
order to make a full report on ESS• Further studying of the current infrastructure in order to define
the ageing of the network in junction points• Current flow analysis and simulations might take place• Public attitude study towards implementation of smart metering
and possible change in habits
35
Thank you for your attention !