Mpbep 2011 04 prsnttn ecologicalimpactsmpbpineforestssouthernfoothills

34
Ecological Impacts of the Mountain Pine Beetle on Pine Forests of the Southern Foothills, Alberta A Case Study in Waterton Lakes National Park Jodi Axelson (University of Victoria, Department of Geography, Victoria BC)

description

https://foothillsri.ca/sites/default/files/null/MPBEP_2011_04_Prsnttn_EcologicalImpactsMPBPineForestsSouthernFoothills.pdf

Transcript of Mpbep 2011 04 prsnttn ecologicalimpactsmpbpineforestssouthernfoothills

Page 1: Mpbep 2011 04 prsnttn ecologicalimpactsmpbpineforestssouthernfoothills

Ecological Impacts of the Mountain

Pine Beetle on Pine Forests of the

Southern Foothills, Alberta

A Case Study in Waterton Lakes National Park

Jodi Axelson (University of Victoria, Department of Geography, Victoria BC)

Page 2: Mpbep 2011 04 prsnttn ecologicalimpactsmpbpineforestssouthernfoothills

Background

• Over the last decade researchers at the Pacific Forestry Centre have conducted a number of studies in lodgepole pine stands in BC and Alberta to examine the effects of the mountain pine beetle (MPB) on stand dynamics.

• Results of these studies have been used in decision support models such as TASS: Tree and Stand Simulator

• In 2008/09 did dendroecological research in the west-central Foothills as part of the Foothills Growth and Yield project “Monitoring and Decision Support for Forest Management in a Mountain Pine Beetle Environment” (Alfaro et al. 2009).

Page 3: Mpbep 2011 04 prsnttn ecologicalimpactsmpbpineforestssouthernfoothills

• In 1981 permanent sample plots (PSPs) were established in five stands in Waterton Lakes National Park to study effects of the 1970s MPB outbreak.

• In 2002 stands were re-measured to evaluate the affect of the outbreak on stand dynamics.

• In 2010 stands were once again re-measured project to fill a key regional gap in the southern Rocky Mountains. In addition, detailed dendroecological samples collected to determine the disturbance history at each stand.

Waterton Lakes National Park

Page 4: Mpbep 2011 04 prsnttn ecologicalimpactsmpbpineforestssouthernfoothills

East Slopes sites

Page 5: Mpbep 2011 04 prsnttn ecologicalimpactsmpbpineforestssouthernfoothills

Objectives

• Develop ecological baselines of biotic disturbances in Waterton Lakes National Park using a dendroecological approach → reconstructing past MPB outbreaks and the mortality and regeneration dynamics post-disturbance

• Examine how biotic disturbances affect future forest structure and composition → overstorey, understorey and fuels

• Integrate dendroecological data collected in this project with previous surveys in the central and northern Rocky Mountains to provide a comprehensive picture of disturbance regimes ands stand dynamics for the east slopes

Page 6: Mpbep 2011 04 prsnttn ecologicalimpactsmpbpineforestssouthernfoothills

• Variable radius plots were used to measure

overstorey metrics with a 2 m2/ha BAF prism (all

years)

• Fixed area plots were established to tally

advance regeneration and seedlings by height

class and species (2002, 2010)

• Coarse and fine fuels were measured along 30

metre transects (2002, 2010)

PSP methods

Page 7: Mpbep 2011 04 prsnttn ecologicalimpactsmpbpineforestssouthernfoothills

• In 2010 dendroecological samples were collected

from overstorey, understorey and CWD

Dendroecological methods

Page 8: Mpbep 2011 04 prsnttn ecologicalimpactsmpbpineforestssouthernfoothills

Results

• The degree of lodgepole pine mortality

was highly variable between plots and

between stands

• Lodgepole pine density has decreased in

all stands from 1981 to 2010

• Lodgepole pine volume decreased in all

stands from 1981 to 2010, with exception

of stand 1

Page 9: Mpbep 2011 04 prsnttn ecologicalimpactsmpbpineforestssouthernfoothills

Overstorey lodgepole pine density

Stand

No.

1981

(sph)

Pl - % Live

(% Dead)

2002

(sph)

Pl - % Live

(% Dead)

2010

(sph)

Pl - % Live

(% Dead)

1 1393 90 (10) 1203 72 (28) 1029 84 (16)

2 1180 45 (55) 727 39 (61) 361 76 (24)

3 1523 68 (32) 765 60 (40) 482 67 (33)

4 724 7 (93) 174 35 (65) 78 49 (51)

5 1163 71 (29) 739 65 (35) 487 80 (20)

Average 1197 56 (44) 721 54 (46) 487 71 (29)

Page 10: Mpbep 2011 04 prsnttn ecologicalimpactsmpbpineforestssouthernfoothills

Lodgepole pine mortality 1981

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1 2 3 4 5

Stand No.

To

tal

tre

es

/ha

Dead Pl

Live Pl

Page 11: Mpbep 2011 04 prsnttn ecologicalimpactsmpbpineforestssouthernfoothills

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1 2 3 4 5

Stand No.

To

tal

tre

es

/ha

1981

2002

2010

Overstorey lodgepole pine density

Page 12: Mpbep 2011 04 prsnttn ecologicalimpactsmpbpineforestssouthernfoothills

Overstorey lodgepole pine volume

Stand

No. 1981

(m3/ha)

Pl - % Live

(% Dead) 2002

(m3/ha)

Pl - % Live

(% Dead) 2010

(m3/ha)

Pl - % Live

(% Dead)

1 123.74 83 (17) 132.95 78 (22) 133.92 0.89 (0.11)

2 201.62 32 (68) 130.34 50 (50) 86.96 0.78 (0.22)

3 222.42 56 (44) 155.23 80 (20) 77.60 0.77 (0.23)

4 148.19 5 (95) 26.71 30 (70) 14.17 0.50 (0.50)

5 171.01 61 (39) 132.62 78 (22) 71.81 0.85 (0.15)

Average 173.39 47 (53) 115.5 63 (37) 76.89 75 (25)

Page 13: Mpbep 2011 04 prsnttn ecologicalimpactsmpbpineforestssouthernfoothills

Overstorey lodgepole pine volume

Page 14: Mpbep 2011 04 prsnttn ecologicalimpactsmpbpineforestssouthernfoothills

Results

• While there has been a decline in lodgepole pine

density there has been an increase in non-host

species such as spruce and fir from 1981 to

2010

• With the exception of stand 1, sapling and

seedling densities have increased in all stands

from 2002 to 2010

– High degree of variability in stocking between stands

– Composition made up almost entirely of shade tolerant species

Page 15: Mpbep 2011 04 prsnttn ecologicalimpactsmpbpineforestssouthernfoothills

Overstorey Saplings Regeneration

Page 16: Mpbep 2011 04 prsnttn ecologicalimpactsmpbpineforestssouthernfoothills

Saplings Regeneration

Page 17: Mpbep 2011 04 prsnttn ecologicalimpactsmpbpineforestssouthernfoothills

Saplings Regeneration

Page 18: Mpbep 2011 04 prsnttn ecologicalimpactsmpbpineforestssouthernfoothills

Saplings Regeneration

Page 19: Mpbep 2011 04 prsnttn ecologicalimpactsmpbpineforestssouthernfoothills

Results

• Fine fuels have remained relatively

constant between 2002 and 2010

– Stand 2 had increase as standing dead

decreased by 32% between 2002 and 2010

• Coarse fuel mass and volume has

increased in all stands from 2002 to 2010

as MPB killed trees have fallen to the

ground

Page 20: Mpbep 2011 04 prsnttn ecologicalimpactsmpbpineforestssouthernfoothills

Fuels: Mass and Volume

Page 21: Mpbep 2011 04 prsnttn ecologicalimpactsmpbpineforestssouthernfoothills

Disturbance History

• Overstorey pine ages ranged from 83 to 125 years

old, and non-host species ranged between 51 to

104 years old

• MPB was detected in all PSPs via stand-wide

growth releases in the survivors (co-dominant and

intermediate at time of attack)

• Growth release data is supported by death dates for

CWD and lagged regeneration pulses

Page 22: Mpbep 2011 04 prsnttn ecologicalimpactsmpbpineforestssouthernfoothills
Page 23: Mpbep 2011 04 prsnttn ecologicalimpactsmpbpineforestssouthernfoothills
Page 24: Mpbep 2011 04 prsnttn ecologicalimpactsmpbpineforestssouthernfoothills
Page 25: Mpbep 2011 04 prsnttn ecologicalimpactsmpbpineforestssouthernfoothills

Tree-ring data integration

Page 26: Mpbep 2011 04 prsnttn ecologicalimpactsmpbpineforestssouthernfoothills

• Have collected a total of 28 lodgepole pine

chronologies on the east slopes

• Chronologies represent sites spanning 5

degrees of latitude

– West-central region:15 chronologies

– South-western region:11 chronologies

• Objective of studies was to evaluate mountain

pine beetle (MPB) impacts on lodgepole pine

Tree-ring data integration

Page 27: Mpbep 2011 04 prsnttn ecologicalimpactsmpbpineforestssouthernfoothills

• How homogenous is tree-ring variability along a north-south transect on the east slopes of the Rocky Mountains in Alberta?

• How sensitive is tree-ring variability to stand disturbances (e.g., mountain pine beetle outbreaks) versus climate and/or climatic teleconnections?

• Do chronologies from southern Alberta, in areas of known mountain pine beetle outbreak, group with chronologies collected farther north where there are no documented outbreaks?

Research questions

Page 28: Mpbep 2011 04 prsnttn ecologicalimpactsmpbpineforestssouthernfoothills

Factor Analysis

FC4

FC1

FC2

FC3

Factor Eigenvalue Percent total variance

Cumulative percent

1 7.41 28.5 28.5 2 4.81 18.5 47.0 3 3.18 12.2 59.2 4 2.26 8.7 67.9

Page 29: Mpbep 2011 04 prsnttn ecologicalimpactsmpbpineforestssouthernfoothills

Factor chronologies (FCs)

FC1 loaded by low elevation Grande

Prairie chronologies in Lower Foothills

natural sub-region.

FC2 loaded by high elevation chronologies

in Nordegg and Banff area in Subalpine

natural sub-region.

FC3 based on two Waterton Lakes NP

chronologies in the Montane natural

sub-region at mid-elevation.

FC4 loaded by two Jasper NP

chronologies also in mid-elevation

Montane natural su-region.

Page 30: Mpbep 2011 04 prsnttn ecologicalimpactsmpbpineforestssouthernfoothills

Factor chronology 2 (Nordegg-Banff) The Pacific Decadal Oscillation and FC2

1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

Sta

nd

ard

ize

d In

de

x

March PDO

FC2r = 0.56

Page 31: Mpbep 2011 04 prsnttn ecologicalimpactsmpbpineforestssouthernfoothills

• Strong geographical and sub-regional groupings

• Variance was spread amongst each retained FC

• Some factors chronologies had strong correlations to climatic variables and/or climatic indices, whereas others had weak correlations with climate but strong regime shifts possibly indicative of stand disturbance dynamics

• Chronologies in the west-central region did not group with chronologies in the south with documented MPB outbreaks, suggesting that disturbances detected arise from other agents

Inferences

Page 32: Mpbep 2011 04 prsnttn ecologicalimpactsmpbpineforestssouthernfoothills

Take Home Messages

• Stands in Waterton Lakes National Park show remarkable resilience

• Thirty years post-MPB outbreak and stands are more heterogeneous

• In face of uncertainty managers can use this type of information in a more natural disturbances based management framework

Page 33: Mpbep 2011 04 prsnttn ecologicalimpactsmpbpineforestssouthernfoothills

Acknowledgements

Page 34: Mpbep 2011 04 prsnttn ecologicalimpactsmpbpineforestssouthernfoothills

Questions?