MP3 Format and the Purchasing of Music
description
Transcript of MP3 Format and the Purchasing of Music
MP3 Format and the Purchasing of Music
Derek J. Archambault
Johnson & Wales University
© 1999 Derek J. Archambault
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary ...................................................... Page 1
Introduction .................................................................. Page 2
Secondary Source Review ............................................. Page 7
Methodology ................................................................ Page 18
Data Analysis ............................................................... Page 28
Conclusions ................................................................... Page 39
Recommendations .......................................................... Page 40
Works Cited ................................................................... Page 41
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
There are three major objectives that have been addressed in this research. The first was
to determine if the MP3 format is encouraging more people to download illegal bootlegged
recordings off the Internet. The second was to determine if the MP3 format has had a significant
influence on the purchasing of regularly available recordings. The third major objective was to
find out if new technologies such as the Diamond Rio portable MP3 player or writable CD-
ROMs are leading to an increase in bootlegged pirated sound recordings.
The survey was conducted utilizing the Internet, and its newsgroups, e-mail and a Web
page. Participants in certain newsgroups were invited to complete a Web-based survey, and the
results were e-mailed to the researcher, and then compiled and analyzed.
The results of this research show that the MP3 format is having what could be considered
a positive influence on the purchasing habits of music consumers. Although some respondents
(eight of 50) said that they did not purchase a full-length recording because they had downloaded
a MP3 version, the majority of the respondents (66%) said that they had bought a full-length
recording because of a downloaded MP3 sample.
These results illustrate that the music industry needs to find a way to embrace the new
technologies available to them on the Internet, and find a way to use them efficiently and
profitability. For future research, it is recommended that a larger sample be used, and more of an
attempt be made to reach a greater range of Internet users and music fans.
Page 1
INTRODUCTION
Relevant History and Personal Background Information
This study was inspired by the recent debate and furor over the new MP3 format of
sound files for computers. The high quality and small size of the MP3 files makes the
distribution of high-quality sound files over the Internet easier than ever before. The researcher’s
interest in computers and especially music exposed him to the music industry’s concern that the
MP3 files may lead to an increase in illegally distributed sound recordings. This research is an
attempt to determine if this new format is truly leading to a major increase in illegally copied and
distributed copyrighted sound recordings.
Definition of Terms
To begin, an understanding of what MP3 stands for and consists of must be had. MP3
(pronounced by saying the letters “m” and “p” and then “three”) stands for MPEG (pronounced
“Mmm-peg”) 1 Layer 3. It is a technology developed by the Moving Picture Experts Group
(MPEG) for compressing sound files for speedier transfer and more efficient storage. MPEGs
have gone through several developments, or “layers,” the latest of which is Layer 3, the highest
quality technology available at this time. MPEG is the name of family of standards used for coding
audio-visual information (e.g., movies, video, music) in a digital compressed format.
MP3 allows compression by a 10:1 ratio. It allows approximately 60 minutes of “CD-
quality” music, or over 8 hours of speech, to be compressed to 32 megabytes of storage space (or
memory). MP3 has caused such turmoil because of its high quality and small file size.
Previously, audio files downloaded off the Internet were not of a particularly high quality and
Page 2
high-quality clips were very large in data size.
A much older term also needs to be defined. “Bootlegging” refers to the act of making
illegal copies of sound or video recordings, depriving the artist of his or her’s royalty rights.
“Bootlegs” is the term used to refer to the illegal product. Bootlegging has been around for many
years- nearly as long as there has been recording equipment- but with each new advance in
recording technology comes new concerns about artists’ rights. Bootlegging is often referred to as
“pirating,” and some people may draw a distinction between a bootleg and a pirated copy, with
the former being for legal personal use and the latter being for illegal purposes, such as making a
profit off the recording.
This distinction usually stems from fans of bootlegged live performances, and the bands
that support such practices, such as the Grateful Dead, Phish, the Dave Mathews Band,
Metallica, and the Black Crowes, to name a few. However, the artist must give express
permission to tape a live performance, and it must be used only for personal use for it to be legal.
Any performance taken from a normally available full-length recording (referred to in this report
as either “full-length recording” or a “CD” (compact disc), the most popular full-length format)
or any other recording distributed without the artist’s consent is considered to be a pirated or
bootlegged recording.
The last term is again a technical term- “newsgroups”. Newsgroups have been a part of
the Internet almost since its inception. There are tens of thousands of newsgroups, covering
nearly every subject imaginable. They are identified by their name, beginning with a prefix such
Page 3
as “alt” for alternative, or cutting edge subjects, “comp” for computers, “rec” for recreation, and
many, many, other prefixes. The subjects range from music to sex, from religion to programming.
The specific nature of newsgroups allow for targeting people with special interests. Newsgroups
were used in this study to reach the target sample population of regular music listeners and
Internet users.
Specific Circumstances Surrounding this Study
This research was conducted as part of the Johnson & Wales University’s Honors
Program, which the researcher is enrolled in. As part of the graduation requirements for Honors
Students, the researcher must complete a number of “H-Option” projects, which involves doing
additional projects and work in that class.
This project therefore, has been done in addition to the normal work load of the
Marketing Research II class. Because of this, the research has faced the same circumstances as a
regular research project, but more so- a lack of time and resources such as funding.
Research Objectives
There are three major objectives that have been addressed in this research. The first was
to determine if the high-quality and high-compression of MP3 files are encouraging more people
to download illegal bootlegged recordings off the Internet. The second was to determine if the
MP3 format has had a significant influence on sales of regularly available recordings (CDs etc.),
because of MP3 samples encouraging the listener to purchase the entire recording, or because of
people not purchasing a recording because they already have it in MP3 format. The third major
Page 4
objective was to find out if new technologies such as the Diamond Mulitimedia Rio portable
MP3 player or writable CD-ROMs are leading to an increase in bootlegged pirated sound
recordings.
Research Question
Is the downloading of the new MPEG-3 (MP3) format of sound recordings having a
significant and measurable influence on the purchasing habits of music consumers?
Relevant Variables
The independent variable is the use of MPEG-3 files and the dependent variable is the
purchasing habits of music consumers.
Value of the Study
This study can prove to be extremely valuable in the music industry. Based on the
conclusions of this study, it can be considered that the music industry’s worries about the new
MP3 format is are misguided, and that instead of fighting the format, the recording industry
should embrace this and other new technologies and use them to their advantage.
Limitations of the Study
While this is a very important and timely survey, it does have several limitations that
need to be taken into consideration. This research reflects the opinions of only 50 people, and
therefore, should not be considered to be applicable to the general population. Also, because the
survey was publicized only in the Internet newsgroups, it might reflect a more technologically
savvy person and not be a reflection of the average Internet user/music fan.
Page 5
Another limitation, and exciting aspect, of this research was the immediacy of the topic
and the secondary data. As this research was being completed, several lawsuits were in process,
and new information is being made available daily, making any attempt for a comprehensive
secondary source review very difficult.
Page 6
SECONDARY SOURCE REVIEW
“Diamond Multimedia to Temporarily Delay Shipment of the Rio PMP200 Portable
Music Player.” 19 Oct. 1998 <www.mp3.com/news/112.html>.
Bringing to a head the controversy over the new MP3 format, the Recording Industry
Association of America (RIAA) obtained a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) against
Diamond Multimedia Systems, Inc to temporarily delay shipment of the company’s new
portable music player, the Rio PMP300.
One of the RIAA’s biggest concerns is that of “serial copying” which is the ability to
make multiple copies of a sound recording. However, when issuing the TRO, Judge Collins
undermined one of the RIAA’s biggest concerns, stating that “the Rio is not capable of serial
copying”.
Hellweg, Eric. “The Sound of Money.” Business 2.0 Sept. 1998:114-116.
This article explores the new possibilities, limitations and dangers of distributing music in
a digital format. It explains three major formats which are vying for acceptance within the
industry- the MP3 format, Liquid Audio and AT&T’s a2b format. Unlike MP3, Liquid Audio
and especially a2b, are gaining industry acceptance thanks to the use of “digital watermarks,” an
electronic “stamp” showing the source of the file, and “encryption keys” which ensure a song can
be decrypted only by a sanctioned player.
Hellweg states that the digital distribution market could “in turn create a new vast, and
Page 7
dramatically cheaper distribution system for record companies.” He also points out that MP3
has already garnered a huge installed user base, “estimated at more than 3 million”. The article
also mentions MP3 CD players which are under development. These would allow a writable
CD-ROM to store 10 times as many songs as a standard CD, but would require a certain amount
of computing power to decode the songs.
“IBM’s New Spin on Music.” Business 2.0 Oct. 1998: 14.
In an attempt to legitimatize the digital distribution of music over the Internet
(downloading the music you buy, as opposed to purchasing a traditional recording over the
Internet and having it shipped to you), computer giant IBM is teaming up with members of the
“Big Six” recording labels to develop an acceptable method of file distribution. The article
mentions that the RIAA has been reluctant to engage in or endorse such program for fear of
piracy, which “now constitutes $300 million dollars lost every year in domestic record sales
alone” according to the RIAA.
The RIAA estimates of Internet distribution accounted for 0.3 percent of the total $12.2
billion spent in 1997 on music sales, but mark the beginning of “exponential growth in this
sector” which makes development of an acceptable standard all the more important.
Page 8
Krochmal, Mo. “Music Industry Unprepared for MP3.” TechWeb 16 Sept. 1998
<www.cmp.com>.
The MP3 format appears to be catching on fastest in the college markets, according to
this article, thanks to colleges’ high-speed Internet access and because MP3s “lets the user make
an unlimited number of digital copies.” Robert Glaser, CEO of RealNetworks is quoted in the
article as saying that portable MP3 players (such as the Diamond Rio Player) are a “hybrid of
personal use and piracy.” However, it should be noted that Glaser has a lot at stake in this
battle- his company is the leading provider of streaming media (files that are watched or listened
to over an Internet connection, but the file is not actually downloaded and then erased) on the
Internet.
The article states that it may take a while for the widespread use of digital distribution of
music, legal or otherwise, because of the limited bandwidth (amount of data capable of being sent)
in most homes. However, the high bandwidth available on college campuses make it a perfect
place for downloading illegal MP3 files.
The article provides some important statistics. Hillary Rosen, the CEO of the RIAA
states that “On some college campuses, people are not buying music anymore.” The search term
“MP3” is the third most popular on the AltaVista search engine. Approximately five million
software MP3 players have been downloaded from the Internet and another 3.5 million
LiquidAudio players have been downloaded.
Page 9
Lipton, Beth. “Digital Music Hits Sour Note.” CNET News.com 15 July 1998
<http://www.news.com/News/Item/0,4,24244,00.html>.
This article investigates the viability of music delivered via downloads as opposed to the
purchase of CDs online. New York research firm Jupiter Communications released information
prediction that music distributed digitally will amount to only $30 million by 2002, or 2.2
percent of total online music sales, which is predicted to reach $1.4 billion in the United States
alone.
Forrester Research corroborates this information, with senior analyst Mark Hardie stating
that “There’s no mass market there” and that record labels would have to “come together and
agree on a standard way to do it. Plus the labels have to get permission from every one of their
artists.”
Hardie also mentions that labels may encounter resistance from artists, who view an
album as “a single piece of work- not 12 singles” and digital distribution would most certainly
involve a “by-the-song” approach.
Jupiter Communications suggests four stages in a strategy to expand digital downloading.
First, labels should offer special promotions in which users can download a single track before
buying an album. Next they can offer out-of-print albums digitally, followed by catalog
backlists. Finally the labels could release new albums for digital distribution.
Again in this article, the legal issues of digital distribution are raised- this article states that
a study earlier in he year found that “nearly 80,000 illegal music files were already available on
Page 10
the Internet.”
Lipton, Beth. “Net Music Pirates Face Lawsuits.” CNET News.com 13 May 1998
<http://www.news.com/News/Item/0,4,22060,00.html>.
This article illustrates the RIAA’s efforts to capture and prosecute individuals who
illegally distribute music over the Internet. One major suit was filed in U.S. District Court in
Arizona. The suit names the Web Site operator, Fred Cohen was well as his Internet service
provider, Arizona Bizness Network in a copyright infringement suit. Cohen, a 20-year old
junior at Arizona State University, is the systems administrator for Arizona Bizness Network.
There were about 50 songs posted on Cohen’s site, all by major artists. Another suit was filed in
the Western District of Washington, against a site operator who the RIAA says posted more
than 1,100 songs.
Cohen doesn’t see the problem with what he was doing- “I never understood why they
want to enforce those copyrights when it doesn’t hurt them. It was great advertising for them,”
he said. Cohen said he also had links to record stores so that they could buy the actual CD. A
poll on his site showed that more than half of the people who listened to songs on his site
followed the links to stores and bought CDs.
These lawsuits bring up another unclear area in the illegal distribution of music over the
Internet- are the providers of the server space liable for what their customers put on their Web
Sites? Under current copyright laws, the answer is yes, but that may change with new laws
Page 11
being considered by the federal government.
Lipton, Beth. “Music Agencies Want Net Money.” CNET News.com 15 April 1998
<http://www.news.com/News/Item/0,4,21127,00.html>.
If the issues of illegal distribution is suddenly settled, there are other issues that need to
be address. This includes the issues of royalties, publishing rights and a fundamental question: is
a song that is downloaded from an Internet site a purchase or a performance? This is a question
that the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (ASCAP) and BMI, two
organizations that deal with licensing music, want to answer.
Both organization charge royalties based on public performance, not the sale of music
online. However, it has not been determined if the digital distribution of music most resembles
the purchase of a CD or a performance. Because most Internet music sites are not yet profitable,
many of them are trying to avoid paying the license fees collected by BMI and ASCAP. Such
distributors need to make a decision whether the licensing fee goes to the record company (if a
download equals a CD purchase) or ASCAP or BMI (if it is decided a download resembles a
performance).
In an attempt to track music downloads on the Internet, BMI has developed the
MusicBot, a technology that scours the Internet looking for sound files. This technology is now
being used by the Australasian Performing Rights Association (APRA), making it the first foreign
entity to do so.
Page 12
Maclachlan, Malcolm. “ASCAP Seeks to Regulate Online Music Sites.” TechWeb 13
July 1998 <http://www.cmp.com/>.
ASCAP has announced its own technology to track music files on the Internet, dubbed
EZ-Seeker. EZ-Seeker utilizes Web crawler technology to locate sties that distribute music in the
most common audio and video formats. The software even determines what artists are being
played, issues license forms and track compliance. ASCAP is also licensing, free of charge, the
EZ-Seeker technology to other entertainment licensing groups around the world. ASCAP
considers MP3 downloads a performance, subject to licensing fees, according to Marc
Morgenstern, senior vice president of new media at ASCAP. Sites that legitimately distribute
legal MP3 files argue that the format is more similar to selling a CD than playing a song, since no
music actually played when an MP3 is downloaded, and is instead downloaded to the user’s
computer and can be played repeatedly.
Maclachlan, Malcolm. “Record Labels Fear Net Will Kill Profits.” TechWeb 7 July 1998
<http://www.cmp.com/>.
At the first annual MP3 Online Music Conference in Sand Diego, participants said that
there is money to be made selling music online, but record labels will not approach the profits
gained from traditional sales of CDs. According to the article, most of the Conference was about
“empowering” artists who make about $1.50 on the sale of $12 to $15 compact discs. Some
bands which were signed by major labels, such as the Throwing Muses and the Tragically Hip,
Page 13
have left their major labels and now make smaller, but more consistent profits from selling music
online.
The differences between the digital advocates and the traditional big labels resemble the
same rifts that divide mainstream and independent music in the physical world. Some online-
only record labels, such as GoodNoise, make an attempt to sign artists that would not attract the
attention of a major label.
On the issue of piracy, GoodNoise’s CEO Gene Hoffman says that piracy is a
“marketing problem. These people are your customers. If they’re pirating, they like it.”
The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) bill, up for a congressional vote in
the United States, would make it illegal to remove copyright protections on new mediums such as
MPEGs. The problem is that such copyright protections violate “fair use” protections that
allow users to make a personal copy, and would “stifle the medium.” Hoffman uses Microsoft
as an example of how some industries have given up on copyright protections years ago:
“Microsoft is the most pirated software company in the world. They pull in, oh, about $12
billion a year, or (as much as) the entire record industry.”
Another potential reason for the record industry’s insecurity over MPEGs is their
diminishing share of the industry’s profits. The five biggest labels generate 80% of the profits in
he recording industry, down from 90% just five years ago.
Page 14
“RIAA Wins Restraining Order Against MP3 Recording Device.” MP3.com 19 Oct 1998
<http://www.mp3.com/news/112.html>.
This article examines the temporary restraining order granted against Diamond
Multimedia’s Rio portable MP3 recording device. According to this RIAA news release, the Rio
violates the Audio Home Recording Act (AHRA) which was enacted as a result of the risks
posed by unauthorized digital copying of music. According to the RIAA, under the AHRA,
“manufacturers, importers and distributors of digital audio recording devices” will receive a
“limited immunity from liability for copyright infringement, only if in exchange they pay a
royalty to compensate the artists, composers, musicians, publishers and record companies” who
lose monetary recognition due to unauthorized copying. They must also incorporate a “serial
copyright management system” (SCMS) into their products to prevent the making of second
generation copies.
However, as mentioned in the first article, review, it was stated by Judge Collins that “the
Rio is not capable of serial copying”.
Robertson, Michael. “Motion Denied - Rio To Go On Sale.” MP3.com 30 Oct 1998
<http://www.mp3.com/news/116.html>.
In an article about the results of the RIAA’s attempt to block the sale of the Rio MP3
player, Michael Robertson relates the court’s reversal of the restraining order granted against
Diamond Multimedia. This is sure to be only one in a long series of legal controversies
Page 15
surrounding the MP3 format.
Robertson, Michael. “Rio Rocks Music Industry.” MP3.com 19 Oct 1998
<http://www.mp3.com/news/101.html>.
This article provides an excellent description of what the Diamond Multimedia Rio MP3
player consists of. The $199 unit is smaller than a deck of cards and has no moving parts. It can
run for 12 hours on one AA size battery. The Rio uses “flash memory cards” which are
computer chip cards which can store songs, and can be erased and rewritten. Each 32 MB flash
memory card (enough for 60 minutes of music) costs $99. The unit comes with the MusicMatch
software which allows the buyers’ existing CDs to be converted into MP3s and loaded onto the
device easily.
As usual, the article weighs in with its take on the piracy issue, stating that “there has
been no documentation produced by any music organization indicating that (MP3s being used
almost exclusively for pirating) is any more than opinion.” That article states that “cost of
serving the MP3 files [over the Internet] prohibit any large scale illegal operations from going
undetected.”
Robertson, Michael. “Samsung Announces Portable Player.” MP3.com 22 Oct 1998
<http://www.mp3.com/news/113.html>.
This article comes in the middle of the fight over Diamond Mulitimedia’s Rio player.
Page 16
Samsung, one of the leading consumer electronics companies, announced the December 1998
shipping date of its new portable MP3 player. Unlike the Rio however, Samsung’s MP3 player
will come with the ability to record real time using a built-in microphone. A more expensive
model will also have the ability to connect directly to external audio equipment, a point that is
sure to create more controversy.
Page 17
METHODOLOGY
Sample Size and Rationale
The sample size for this study was 50 respondents. This number has been chosen due to
time and resource constraints, and because it fits the purpose of this study.
Sampling Method and Justification
The sampling method was a non-probability snowball sample. This was chosen because
of the method of communication. To obtain respondents for this survey, e-mails were sent to
various Internet newsgroups, asking them to fill out the survey. This results in an increasing
number of people filing out the on-line survey as more people read the “posting” and possibly
spread it to other newsgroups and interested individuals.
Null Hypothesis and Alternate Hypothesis
Null hypothesis: “There is not a significant and measurable relationship between the
downloading of the new MPEG-3 (MP3) format of sound recordings and the purchasing habits
of music consumers. “
Alternate hypothesis: “There is a significant and measurable relationship between the
downloading of the new MPEG-3 (MP3) format of sound recordings and the purchasing habits
of music consumers.”
Definition of Sample Population
The sample population of this survey was regular Internet users and music fans, defined
as people spending more than five hours per week on the Internet and spending more than two
Page 18
hours per week listening to music.
Explanation of Sampling Units
The sampling units consisted of respondents gained from communicating with
newsgroups participants. An e-mail was sent to a number of newsgroups, and were invited to fill
out a survey on the Web. The first two questions acted as screening questions during the editing
and coding phase.
Level of Significance
The level of significance for this study was .05, which is a 5% chance of error with a 95%
confidence interval. This level of significance was chosen primarily due to the use of the Minitab
program in the statistical process, and because of its acceptance as a standard level of
significance.
Account of Data Collection
The method of communication for this research was through an on-line survey. To reach
the intended target size of 50 Internet users who listen to music, the survey was posted as a Web
Page, with buttons and check boxes to respond to questions.
On October 18, 1998 an e-mail was sent to the following newsgroups:
• alt.music.bootlegs• alt.music.davematthews• alt.music.dreamtheater• alt.music.industrial• alt.music.info-society• alt.music.midi• alt.music.mp3• alt.music.bootleg• alt.music-lover.audiophile
Page 19
• alt.music-lover.audiophile.hardware• comp.music• comp.music.research• alt.music.makers.electronic• rec.music.classical• rec.music.hip-hop• rec.music.jazz• alt.rap• rec.music• rec.music.ambient• alt.emusic
These newsgroups were chosen because of their subject matter and the audience they
typically attract. The represent discussions across a variety of music styles, including some who
regularly exchange bootleg recordings, and people who are interested in the combination of
computers and music.
The completed surveys were then “collected” as the completed surveys were sent via e-
mail. Once more than enough responses (87 total responses) were returned, the Web Page with
the questionnaire was replaced with a page thanking people for their time, and stating that no
more surveys were needed. The completed surveys were then looked at briefly on screen, paying
special attention to the first two screening questions. Then 50 questionnaire responses were
printed and edited and coded. Additional questionnaires were printed as problems arose such as
inconsistencies or incomplete questionnaires. Then all 50 competed responses were coded and
numbered. Data entry began on October 25 and was completed on October 27.
Copy of Survey Instrument
Please see the following three pages
Page 20
MP3 SurveyIntroduction:A new sound file format, MPEG-3, or MP3, is causing some serious debate in the recording industry. MP3stands for MPEG 1 layer 3, which is a way to digitally record sounds and music in such a way that the filesize is relatively small, but the sound quality is nearly perfect. You can identify MP3 files because the filename ends in .MP3.
MP3 files have come to be considered potentially "dangerous" by the recording industry because of their highquality and easy portability and duplication. This survey is an attempt to determine if the MP3 is actuallyhaving an influence in the traditional music purchasing habits of consumers.
This survey is being conducted as part of a Marketing Research Class at Johnson & Wales University. Allanswers are completely anonymous, and will be kept confidential. And since it is just a survey for a collegecourse (the FBI isn't going to come and take your computer away if you fill this out) your honesty andcooperation is appreciated.
SURVEY QUESTIONS:
1. How much time do you spend on the Internet per week ?
less than 5 hours 5-8 hours 9-12 hours 12 or more hours per week
2. How much time do you listen to music per week?
Under 2 hours2-4 hours 5-8 hours 9-12 hours 12 or more hours per week
3. How many times, if ever, have you downloaded a MP3 file?
Never1 time 2-4 times5-7 times8 or more timesDon't know
4. When you download sound files (in any format) of songs (not sound clips), what arethey usually recordings of? (check all that apply)
Live performancesRare tracks or songs released only in other countries, unavailble where you areRecordings taken from a regularly available album or single track
A promotional track, from the artist, availble only through the internetA promotional track given by the artist as a "sample" of a full-length recordingI do not download sound files of songs (skip to question 15)
5. Have you ever bought a full-length recording (a CD or cassette, etc.) as a result ofdownloading a sound file (any format) off the Internet?
Yes No (skip to question 7)
6. Were any of those purchases in a result of downloading an MP3? (please don't answer ifyou answered "no" to question 5)
Yes No
7. Have you ever NOT bought a full-length recording (a CD or cassette, etc.) as a result ofdownloading a sound file (any format) off the Internet?
Yes No (skip to question 10)
8. Was the file that stopped you from purchasing the recording an MP3 file? (please don'tanswer if you answered "no" to question 7)
Yes No
9. Why did you not purchase the full length recording? (again, please don't answer if youanswered "no" to question 7)
You did not like the music once you heard itDidn't bother buying because you already had downloaded it
10. Which kind of music have you most downloaded files of?
AlternativeRockClassicalElectronic/Electronica/AmbientR&B/Hip-hop/rapCountryBluesJazzOther
11. What level of artists do you most download music of?
Independent or local artistA somewhat well-known artist (regionally very popular or well known within that genre)A nationally known artist (Top-40 hits, well-established name recognition with many people)
A mix of all the above
12. Do you own a Diamond Rio Player (a Walkman-like device that plays MP3 files)?
Yes No
13. Do you own a CD-ROM writer?
Yes No (skip to question 15)
14. Have you used the CD-ROM writer to make CD's with songs downloaded off theInternet? (please do not answer if you answered "no" to question 13)
Yes No
15. What is your age?
16. What is your gender?
Male Female
Thank you for your time and cooperation!
SUBMIT Your AnswersSUBMIT Your Answers RESET ALL Your AnswersRESET ALL Your AnswersSUBMIT Your Answers RESET ALL Your Answers
Justification of Survey Instrument
Question 1
This categorical and ordinal question was used as a screening question for reaching the
sample population. It was also used in cross-tabulations with other questions.
Question 2
This categorical and ordinal question was also used as a screening question for reaching
the sample population. It was also used in cross-tabulations with other questions.
Question 3
This question is a categorical question that was used to determine the overall popularity
of downloading MP3 files. It was also cross-tabulated with questions one, four, five, ten, and
thirteen.
.Question 4
This question was used to see what kind of music recordings are most downloaded from
the Internet. The most significant choice is the third- “recordings taken from a regularly available
album or single track” - which would be a bootlegged, or pirated, track distributed illegally on the
Internet.
Question 5
This is a very important question, as it addresses the question of whether digital
downloads of songs (legal or illegal) influences the downloader to purchase the full-length
recording.
Page 24
Question 6
This question helps to test the null by directly asking the respondent if their purchasing
habits have been influenced by the downloading of MP3 files.
Question 7
Similar to question 5, this question examines the debate over the question of whether
digital downloads of songs (legal or illegal) influence the downloader to NOT purchase the full-
length recording.
Question 8
Similar to question six, this question helps to test the null by directly asking the
respondent if their purchasing habits have been influenced by the downloading of MP3 files,
except this time it is in the negative.
Question 9
This question flows from question eight, to determine WHY the person didn’t buy the
recording. This is important, since just because a respondent did not buy a recording because of
an MP3, it does not mean it was because the person didn’t bother to buy it- it could be because
he or she simply did not like the music.
Question 10
This question is used to determine if there is a relationship between a genre of music and
the likelihood of downloading MP3 files, or illegal files.
Question 11
Page 25
This question returns to purpose of determining if bootlegged recordings are the most
popular downloads. If a person is downloading national artists, and downloading regularly
available tracks (question four) then they are participating in downloading in what is most likely
to be illegal sound files.
Question 12
This question refers to the controversial Diamond Multimedia Rio MP3 Player. This is
an important question, because it determines the popularity of the new device among the
respondents.
Question 13
This is a lead-in question to number fourteen. It helps to determine whether owners of
CD-ROM writing drives (now becoming more popular, and one of the first controversial
technologies with the advent of downloadable song files) are more likely to download illegal
sound files.
Question 14
This is a more specific question than question thirteen., asking the respondent if he or she
actually DOES use the CD-writer drive to make music CDs.
Question 15
A simple continuous question asking the respondent’s age, to determine the average age of
the respondents.
Question 16
Page 26
A simple categorical question to determine the gender of the respondent.
Page 27
DATA ANALYSIS
Frequency Distributions
Question 1 - Time on Internet Time on Count Percent 2 6 12.00 3 14 28.00 4 30 60.00 N= 50
Question 2 - Time l istening to musicTime Mus Count Percent 2 1 2.00 3 10 20.00 4 5 10.00 5 34 68.00 N= 50
Quest ion 3 - Number of t imes downloading MP3sMP3 Down Count Percent 1 4 8.00 3 3 6.00 5 43 86.00 N= 50
Quest ion 4(a) - Download l ive recordingsLive 4-A Count Percent 1 37 74.00 2 13 26.00 N= 50
Quest ion 4(b) - Downloading rare recordingsRare 4-B Count Percent 1 30 60.00 2 20 40.00 N= 50
Question 4(c) - Downloading regular recordings Regular Count Percent 1 30 60.00 2 20 40.00 N= 50
Quest ion 4(d) - Downloading promotional recordingsPromo 4- Count Percent 1 18 36.00 2 32 64.00 N= 50
Page 28
Quest ion 4(e) - Downloading sample recordingsPromo 4- Count Percent 1 18 36.00 2 32 64.00 N= 50
Question 5 - Ever bought a ful l - length recording because of
downloading a f i le? Bought Count Percent 1 38 76.00 2 12 24.00 N= 50
Question 6 - Bought the ful l - length recording because of an MP3? MP3? Count Percent 1 33 66.00 2 5 1.00 N= 38 *= 12
Question 7 - Have you ever NOT bought a ful l - length recording
because of sound fi le?Not Boug Count Percent 1 30 60.00 2 20 40.00 N= 50
Question 8 - Did you NOT buy the full- length recording because of
M P 3 ? MP3 Count Percent 1 19 38.00 2 11 22.00 N= 30 *= 20
Question 9 - Why did you not buy the regular recording? Why? Count Percent 1 22 44.00 2 8 16.00 N= 30 *= 20
Quest ion 10 - Genre of music Genre Count Percent 1 12 24.00 2 22 44.00 4 9 18.00 5 2 4.00 8 1 2.00 9 4 8.00
Page 29
N= 50
Quest ion 11 - Level of art ists downloaded Artists Count Percent 1 6 12.00 2 12 24.00 3 9 18.00 4 23 46.00 N= 50
Quest ion 12 - Own a RIO Player? Rio Count Percent 2 50 100.00 N= 50
Quest ion 13 - Own a CD-ROM wr i te r? CD-ROM Count Percent 1 24 48.00 2 26 52.00 N= 50
Q u e s t i o n 1 4 - U s e C D - R O M w r i t e r t o m a k e C D s ?Make CDs Count Percent 1 10 44.00 2 14 56.00 N= 24 *= 26
Question 15 - Frequency distr ibution for age Age Count Percent 14 1 2.00 15 1 2.00 16 6 12.00 17 2 4.00 18 5 10.00 19 6 12.00 20 4 8.00 21 2 4.00 22 2 4.00 23 2 4.00 24 1 2.00 25 3 6.00 26 1 2.00 27 3 6.00 28 1 2.00 29 1 2.00 30 3 6.00 32 1 2.00 33 1 2.00 34 1 2.00 37 1 2.00 40 1 2.00
Page 30
44 1 2.00 N= 50
Question 16 - Frequency distr ibution for gender Gender Count Percent 1 43 86.00 2 7 14.00 N= 50
Code Book
Please see the following three pages
Page 31
MP3 Survey (Master Code Form)Introduction:A new sound file format, MPEG-3, or MP3, is causing some serious debate in the recording industry. MP3stands for MPEG 1 layer 3, which is a way to digitally record sounds and music in such a way that the filesize is relatively small, but the sound quality is nearly perfect. You can identify MP3 files because the filename ends in .MP3.
MP3 files have come to be considered potentially "dangerous" by the recording industry because of their highquality and easy portability and duplication. This survey is an attempt to determine if the MP3 is actuallyhaving an influence in the traditional music purchasing habits of consumers.
This survey is being conducted as part of a Marketing Research Class at Johnson & Wales University. Allanswers are completely anonymous, and will be kept confidential. And since it is just a survey for a collegecourse (the FBI isn't going to come and take your computer away if you fill this out) your honesty andcooperation is appreciated.
SURVEY QUESTIONS:
1. How much time do you spend on the Internet per week ?
less than 5 hours (1)5-8 hours (2)9-12 hours (3)12 or more hours per week (4)
2. How much time do you listen to music per week?
Under 2 hours (1)2-4 hours (2)5-8 hours (3)9-12 hours (4)12 or more hours per week (5)
3. How many times, if ever, have you downloaded a MP3 file?
Never (1)1 time (2)2-4 times (3)5-7 times (4)8 or more times (5)Don't know (6)
4. When you download sound files (in any format) of songs (not sound clips), what arethey usually recordings of? (check all that apply)
Live performances (1)Rare tracks or songs released only in other countries, unavailble where you are (2)Recordings taken from a regularly available album or single track (3)
A promotional track, from the artist, availble only through the internet (4)A promotional track given by the artist as a "sample" of a full-length recording (5)I do not download sound files of songs (skip to question 15) (5)
5. Have you ever bought a full-length recording (a CD or cassette, etc.) as a result ofdownloading a sound file (any format) off the Internet?
Yes (1) No (skip to question 7) (2)
6. Were any of those purchases in a result of downloading an MP3? (please don't answer ifyou answered "no" to question 5)
Yes (1) No (2)
7. Have you ever NOT bought a full-length recording (a CD or cassette, etc.) as a result ofdownloading a sound file (any format) off the Internet?
Yes (1) No (skip to question 10) (2)
8. Was the file that stopped you from purchasing the recording an MP3 file? (please don'tanswer if you answered "no" to question 7)
Yes (1) No (2)
9. Why did you not purchase the full length recording? (again, please don't answer if youanswered "no" to question 7)
You did not like the music once you heard it (1) Didn't bother buying because you already had downloaded it (2)
10. Which kind of music have you most downloaded files of?
Alternative (1) Rock (2)Classical (3) Electronic/Electronica/Ambient (4) R&B/Hip-hop/rap (5) Country (6) Blues (7) Jazz (8) Other (9)
11. What level of artists do you most download music of?
Independent or local artist (1) A somewhat well-known artist (regionally very popular or well known within that genre) (2) A nationally known artist (Top-40 hits, well-established name recognition with many people) (3)
A mix of all the above (4)
12. Do you own a Diamond Rio Player (a Walkman-like device that plays MP3 files)?
Yes (1) No (2)
13. Do you own a CD-ROM writer?
Yes (1) No (skip to question 15) (2)
14. Have you used the CD-ROM writer to make CD's with songs downloaded off theInternet? (please do not answer if you answered "no" to question 13)
Yes (1) No (2)
15. What is your age?
16. What is your gender?
Male (1) Female (2)
Thank you for your time and cooperation!
SUBMIT Your AnswersSUBMIT Your Answers RESET ALL Your AnswersRESET ALL Your AnswersSUBMIT Your Answers RESET ALL Your Answers
Statistical Methods Used
The most used statistical method was the frequency distribution. To test the null hypothesis, a
frequency distribution was utilized on questions six and eight, both of which showed that the
MP3 format is having an influence on the respondent’s music purchasing habits.
Several cross tabulations and bivariate chi-square analyses were performed on various
questions. The cross tabulation of questions one and three, which revealed no statistically
significant relationship between time spent on the Internet and the number of MP3 files
downloaded, although the respondents who did spend the most time on the Internet downloaded
the most MP3 files, albiet not in a statistically significant relationship.
There was also no relationship found: between owning a CD-ROM writer and the number
of MP3 files downloaded; between the level of artist (question eleven) and using a CD-ROM
writer to make CDs; between the number of MP3 files downloaded and the downloading of
pirated songs; and there was no relationship between MP3 downloads and the genre of music
most downloaded.
Additional statistics on question fifteen were computed and are as follows:
Stat is t ics For Age
Variable N Mean Median Minimum Maximum Age 50 22.960 20.500 14.000 44.000
Page 35
Graphs with Explanations
27.8%
22.6%22.6%
13.5%
13.5%
Types of Recordings Downloaded
Live 27.8%
Rare 22.6%
Regular 22.6%
Promo 13.5%
Sample 13.5%
The above graph illustrates the results of question four on the survey. It shows the kind
of recordings that the respondents most downloaded., with live (concert) recordings slightly
ahead of rare and promotional recordings.
Page 36
40
30
20
10
0
33
5
19
11
Influence of MP3 on Purchase of Music
Bought a CD becuase of MP3
CD Purchase NOT influenced by MP3
Did NOT buy a CD because of MP3
Did NOT buy a CD, but not because of MP3
This bar chart shows the influence that the MP3 format is having on the music purchasing
habits of consumers. The first bar on the left shows that the majority of respondents (33) who
have bought a full-length recording as a result of downloading a file from the Internet have done
so because they downloaded a MP3 file. The second bar represents the six respondents who did
purchase a full-length recording because of a file download, but it was not an MP3 file that
influenced them.
The third bar illustrates that 19 respondents did not purchase a full-length recording
because they downloaded an MP3 file, and the fourth represents the 11 people who did not
purchase a full-length recording because of of another type of sound file download.
Page 37
44.0%
16.0%
40%
Reason For Not Purchasing CD
Didn't Like Music 44%
Already Had the Music 16%
Not Applicable 40%
This last pie chart gives the respondents reasons for not purchasing a full-length recording
(a CD), as found in question nine. 44% of the respondents who did not purchase a full-length
recording did so because they did not like the music, and 16% of the respondents did not make
the purchase because they had already downloaded the song and did not bother the purchase the
actual CD. This illustrates that the majority of people who are downloading MP3s from the
Internet are using the technology to sample music before purchasing it.
The results of this question represents a great opportunity for marketing possibilities in
the music industry, as it shows that music consumers want to be able to sample music before
making a full purchase, and the MP3 format is a great way to do it. It also illustrates an
acceptance of the digital distribution of music on the behalf of the consumer.
Page 38
CONCLUSIONS
Accept or Reject the Null Hypothesis with Rationale
The null hypothesis should be rejected, based on the results of questions six and eight.
These two questions, asking the respondent if their purchasing habits had been influenced by the
downloading of an MP3 file, resulted in 66% stating that they had bought a CD or other full-
length recording because they downloaded an MP3 file, and 16% (eight respondents) stating that
they had not purchased a full-length recording because they downloaded the MP3 file of the
performance.
Conclusions
Not only has the MP3 file format had an influence on the purchasing habit of music
consumers, but it is a positive effect as well. 66% of the respondents had bought a full-length
recording because of a downloaded MP3 file, but only 38% had not bought a full-length because
of a MP3 file. Of the 38% (19 respondents) that did not buy a full-length recording, only eight
of them did so because they already had the recording they wanted and didn’t bother buying it.
The others (44% of 50 respondents) did not purchase the CD becuase they did not like the
music.
These figures show that when a person downloads a sound file, illegal or not, they are
very likely to purchase the physical recording (on CD, tape, etc.) after hearing the digital version
of it.
Page 39
RECOMMENDATIONS
Recommendations Based on Findings
Based on the findings of this research, it is recommended that the music industry make
every effort to embrace the new technologies that are emerging on the Internet, rather than try to
fight them. Even with a significant number of artists losing royalties, the proliferation of digital
files of songs on the Internet and the World Wide Web is having a positive influence on the
purchasing habits of consumers. Finding a way to meet consumers’ desire for digitally distributed
music while respecting the artist’s rights is the key to the future of music distribution.
Recommendations for Future Research
For future research, it is recommended that a larger sample be used, and that more of an
attempt be made to to reach a variety of Internet audiences outside of the newsgroups. Also, an
additional question should be added to a future research questionnaire asking the respondent if
they would have bought the full-length recording anyway if they had not downloaded the MP3
file. This will help to determine if the MP3 file truly had a positive motivating influence in the
purchase decision of the consumer.
Page 40
WORKS CITED
“Diamond Multimedia to Temporarily Delay Shipment of the Rio PMP200 Portable Music
Player.” 19 Oct. 1998 <www.mp3.com/news/112.html>.
Hellweg, Eric. “The Sound of Money.” Business 2.0 Sept. 1998:114-116.
“IBM’s New Spin on Music.” Business 2.0 Oct. 1998: 14.
Krochmal, Mo. “Music Industry Unprepared for MP3.” TechWeb 16 Sept. 1998
<www.cmp.com>.
Lipton, Beth. “Digital Music Hits Sour Note.” CNET News.com 15 July 1998
<http://www.news.com/News/Item/0,4,24244,00.html>.
Lipton, Beth. “Net Music Pirates Face Lawsuits.” CNET News.com 13 May 1998
<http://www.news.com/News/Item/0,4,22060,00.html>.
Lipton, Beth. “Music Agencies Want Net Money.” CNET News.com 15 April 1998
<http://www.news.com/News/Item/0,4,21127,00.html>.
Page 41
Maclachlan, Malcolm. “ASCAP Seeks to Regulate Online Music Sites.” TechWeb 13 July 1998
<http://www.cmp.com/>.
Maclachlan, Malcolm. “Record Labels Fear Net Will Kill Profits.” TechWeb 7 July 1998
<http://www.cmp.com/>.
Robertson, Michael. “Motion Denied - Rio To Go On Sale.” MP3.com 30 Oct 1998
<http://www.mp3.com/news/116.html>.
“RIAA Wins Restraining Order Against MP3 Recording Device.” MP3.com 19 Oct 1998
<http://www.mp3.com/news/112.html>.
Robertson, Michael. “Rio Rocks Music Industry.” MP3.com 19 Oct 1998
<http://www.mp3.com/news/101.html>.
Robertson, Michael. “Samsung Announces Portable Player.” MP3.com 22 Oct 1998
<http://www.mp3.com/news/113.html>.
Page 42
The content of this paper is © 1999 Derek J. Archambault and is not to be used, copied or distributed without the express written consent of Derek J. Archambault.
The content of secondary sources are the subject to the rights of their respective owners and are used only in an academic manner.
Page 43