Moving to Sea Containers - The MEC Experience

Moving to Sea Conatiners

© BDG architecture + design Ltd 2016.

Presentation

TEAM OGILVY / 2 MAY 2013

LOCATION & SETTING

TEAM OGILVY / 041 SEA CONTAINERS HOUSE / CONCEPT DESIGN / 2 MAY 2013

LOCATION & RIVER SETTING


AERIAL VIEW


RIVER & RENNIE COURT APPROACH


RIVER ELEVATION


SEA CONTAINERS HOUSE: PARTS


SEA CONTAINERS HOUSE OVERVIEW

RIVER


GROUND LEVEL: ENTRY & RECEPTION

RECEPTION

RIVER

HOTEL


LEVEL 1

L1 RIVERTERRACE

RIVER


LEVEL 2

RIVER

L2 RIVERTERRACE


LEVEL 3

RIVER

L3 RIVERTERRACE


LEVEL 1-3: RIVER TERRACE

L12 - L13

L7 - L11

L1 - L2

+

-

GOOD HEIGHTSWIDER FLOOR PLATESCOULD BE VISIBLE FROM RECEPTIONHIGHLY VISIBLE FROM IMMEDIATE NEIGHBOURHOOD

REMOTE FROM OFFICE STACKSTRUCTURAL WALLS BREAK UP SPACE ON WEST SIDE


LEVEL 4-10: HOTEL

RIVER

HOTEL


LEVEL 8-11

RIVER

STACK


LEVEL 8-11: OFFICE STACK

L12 - L13

L7 - L11

L1 - L2

+

-

RIVER AND BRIDGE VIEWSDOUBLE ASPECT

LOW CEILING HEIGHTSEALED AIR CONDITIONED ENVIRONMENTREMOTE FROM RECEPTIONLONG FLOOR PLATES INTERRUPTED BY CORE


LEVEL 12

RIVER

SKY TERRACE


LEVEL 13

RIVER

SKY TERRACE


LEVEL 12-13: SKY TERRACE

L12 - L13

L7 - L11

L1 - L2

+

-

EXPANSIVE CITY AND RIVER VIEWSWE CAN MAKE IT WHAT WE WANTRELATIVELY PRIVATE

SMALLER FLOOR PLATESHOTEL TERRACE NEXT DOORROOF PLANT & NOISE

evidence BaSed deSiGn

150106_3.4_Case_Study_Presentation© BDG architecture + design Ltd 2014.

15

BDG architecture + design: about us

160405_1.3_TowergateInsurance_Presentation© BDG architecture + design Ltd 2015.

Assess Audit Align

( eVIDence BaseD DesIGn )

TEAM OGILVY / 041 SEA CONTAINERS HOUSE / INTERIM PRESENTATION / 18 APRIL 2013

FUTURE OF WORKPLACE: TREND ANALYSIS ACROSS WPP GROUP SITES IN LONDON

50%

30%

10%

0%

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

60%

40%

% S

HA

RE

D S

PA

CE

20%



50%

30%

10%

0%

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

60%

40%

20%% S

HA

RE

D S

PA

CE


50%

30%

10%

0%

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

60%

40%

SCALE OFBUSINESS

20%

FUTURE OF WORKPLACE: TREND ANALYSIS ACROSS WPP GROUP SITES IN LONDON%

SH

AR

ED

SP

AC

E



50%

30%

10%

0%

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

HEALTHWORLD

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

60%

40%

20%% S

HA

RE

D S

PA

CE



50%

30%

10%

0%

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

HEALTHWORLD

OGILVYNOW

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

60%

40%

20%% S

HA

RE

D S

PA

CE



50%

30%

10%

0%

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

HEALTHWORLD

OGILVYNOW

OGILVY2020

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

60%

40%

20%% S

HA

RE

D S

PA

CE


50%

30%

10%

0%

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

HEALTHWORLD

OGILVYNOW

OGILVY2020

CU

LTU

RA

LC

HA

NG

E

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

60%

40%

20%

FUTURE OF WORKPLACE: TREND ANALYSIS ACROSS WPP GROUP SITES IN LONDON%

SH

AR

ED

SP

AC

E


OGILVY NOW

BRANDED WORKSPACE

SHARED FACILITIES

CS

RW

BLUE HIVE

One

O&M

CS

Action

PR

OHWNEO

RW

BLUE HIVE

CPB

PC

One

O&M

CS

Action

PR

OHW

NEO

RW

BLUE HIVE

CPB

PC

One

O&M

Action

PR

OHW

NEO

CPB

PC

One

O&M

CS

Action

OHW

RW

BLUE HIVE

PR

NEO

CPB

PC

One

O&M

CS

Action

OHW

RW

BLUE HIVE

PR

NEO

CPB

PC

One

O&M

CS

Action

OHW

RW

BLUE HIVE

PR

NEO

CPB

PC

“WE HAVE AN UNSURPASSED RANGE OF CAPABILITIES AND DEEP BENCH-STRENGTH COMPARED TO MOST OF OUR COMPETITORS IN THE UK.

AT THE MOMENT OUR OFFICE CONFIGURATION & LOCATIONS MAKE THIS VERY DIFFICULT TO APPRECIATE.”


OGILVY 2020

CS

RW

BLUE HIVE

One

O&M

CS

Action

PR

OHWNEO

RW

BLUE HIVE

CPB

PC

One

O&M

CS

Action

PR

OHW

NEO

RW

BLUE HIVE

CPB

PC

One

O&M

Action

PR

OHW

NEO

CPB

PC

One

O&M

CS

Action

OHW

RW

BLUE HIVE

PR

NEO

CPB

PC

One

O&M

CS

Action

OHW

RW

BLUE HIVE

PR

NEO

CPB

PC

One

O&M

CS

Action

OHW

RW

BLUE HIVE

PR

NEO

CPB

PC

BRANDED WORKSPACE

SHARED FACILITIES


OGILVY 2020: CENTRALISED FLEXIBILITY

CS

RW

BLUE HIVE

One

O&M

CS

Action

PR

OHWNEO

RW

BLUE HIVE

CPB

PC

One

O&M

CS

Action

PR

OHW

NEO

RW

BLUE HIVE

CPB

PC

One

O&M

Action

PR

OHW

NEO

CPB

PC

One

O&M

CS

Action

OHW

RW

BLUE HIVE

PR

NEO

CPB

PC

One

O&M

CS

Action

OHW

RW

BLUE HIVE

PR

NEO

CPB

PC

One

O&M

CS

Action

OHW

RW

BLUE HIVE

PR

NEO

CPB

PC

BRANDED WORKSPACE

SHARED FACILITIES

SHARED WORKSPACE


OGILVY 2020: DISTRIBUTED FLEXIBILITY

CS

RW

BLUE HIVE

One

O&M

CS

Action

PR

OHWNEO

RW

BLUE HIVE

CPB

PC

One

O&M

CS

Action

PR

OHW

NEO

RW

BLUE HIVE

CPB

PC

One

O&M

Action

PR

OHW

NEO

CPB

PC

One

O&M

CS

Action

OHW

RW

BLUE HIVE

PR

NEO

CPB

PC

One

O&M

CS

Action

OHW

RW

BLUE HIVE

PR

NEO

CPB

PC

One

O&M

CS

Action

OHW

RW

BLUE HIVE

PR

NEO

CPB

PC

BRANDED WORKSPACE

SHARED FACILITIES

SHARED WORKSPACE


OGILVY 2020: DISTRIBUTED, WELL CONNECTED SPACES FOR CLIENT/PROJECT TEAMS

CS

RW

BLUE HIVE

One

O&M

CS

Action

PR

OHWNEO

RW

BLUE HIVE

CPB

PC

One

O&M

CS

Action

PR

OHW

NEO

RW

BLUE HIVE

CPB

PC

One

O&M

Action

PR

OHW

NEO

CPB

PC

One

O&M

CS

Action

OHW

RW

BLUE HIVE

PR

NEO

CPB

PC

One

O&M

CS

Action

OHW

RW

BLUE HIVE

PR

NEO

CPB

PC

One

O&M

CS

Action

OHW

RW

BLUE HIVE

PR

NEO

CPB

PC

“WE CAN THEN CONFIGURE AND DEPLOY SPECIALIST MULTI-DISCIPLINARY TEAMS TO DELIVER THE BEST SOLUTION FOR OUR CLIENTS”

BRANDED WORKSPACE

SHARED FACILITIES

SHARED WORKSPACE

CLIENT/PROJECT SPACE

TEAM OGILVY / 18 APRIL 2013

WORKSETTINGS


HOW TO THINK ABOUT WORKSETTINGSS

EC

LUD

ED

OP

EN


HOW TO THINK ABOUT WORKSETTINGS

BIG

SMALL

SE

CLU

DE

D

OP

EN


BIG

SMALL

SE

CLU

DE

D

OP

EN

EXISTING RANGE OF OGILVY WORKSETTINGS


BIGS

EC

LUD

ED

OP

EN

EXISTING RANGE OF OGIVLY WORKSETTINGS

??

??

SMALL


BIG

SMALL

SE

CLU

DE

D

OP

EN

PROPOSED RANGE OF OGIVLY WORKSETTINGS


ORGANISATIONAL DNA

+

CS

RW

BLUE HIVE

One

O&M

CS

Action

PR

OHWNEO

RW

BLUE HIVE

CPB

PC

One

O&M

CS

Action

PR

OHW

NEO

RW

BLUE HIVE

CPB

PC

One

O&M

Action

PR

OHW

NEO

CPB

PC

One

O&M

CS

Action

OHW

RW

BLUE HIVE

PR

NEO

CPB

PC

One

O&M

CS

Action

OHW

RW

BLUE HIVE

PR

NEO

CPB

PC

One

O&M

CS

Action

OHW

RW

BLUE HIVE

PR

NEO

CPB

PC

BIG

SMALL

SE

CLU

DE

D

OP

EN

ORGANISATION DIVERSITY

BDG/MATHESONWHITELEY / 0280_3.4_OGILVY_WORKSPACE_01 / OCT 2013

STAGE A-B OGIlVY DASHBOARDS


Group overview

Central Services


Ogilvy Group Dashboard

92’017 SF 1574 people

1487 desks

0.9453 55

HEADCOUNT:

DESK COUNT:

DESKS / PERSON:SF/PERSON: SF/DESK:

23-74%

80-100%

50%750 -

OBSERVED DESK OCCUPANCY RATE:

DESK BASED WORK PATTERNS:

PERCEIVED DESK OCCUPANCY RATE:

DESK BASED ACTIVITYIES:

OBSERVED VS.PERCEIVED

STANDING/TAlKING

SITTING/TAlKING

INDIVIDUAlPHONE

INDIVIDUAlqUIET

%-DESKS AVAIlABlE MORE THAN 4H:NO. DESKSFREE > 4H:

SF FREE > 4H:

AREA (NIA):

5% 24%

18%18%

3% 45%

72%64%


Headcount:

desk count:

desks / person:sf/person: sf/desk:

observed desk occupancy rate:

desk based Work patterns:

perceived desk occupancy rate:

desk based activityies:

observed vs.perceived

standing/talking

sitting/talking

individualpHone

individualquiet

%-desks available more tHan 4H:no. desksfree > 4H:

sf free > 4H:

area (nia):

5% 24%

21%20%

4% 47%

70%70%

0.93

57%162 -

4946

60-80%

36-53%

286 desks

308 people14’058 SF

Ogilvy & Mather


Headcount:

desk count:







standing/talking

sitting/talking

individualpHone

individualquiet


sf free > 4H:

area (nia):

16’200 SF

7% 29%

21%19%

4% 59%

73%68%

156 - 46%

0.874842

60-80%

44-60%

337 desks

388 people

Ogilvy One


Headcount:

desk count:







standing/talking

sitting/talking

individualpHone

individualquiet


sf free > 4H:

area (nia):

4% 15%

11%16%

5% 37%

78%75%

42 - 49%

0.753123

60-80%

46-65%

85 desks

2’637 SF 113 people

Ogilvy PR


Headcount:

desk count:







standing/talking

sitting/talking

individualpHone

individualquiet


sf free > 4H:

area (nia):

4% 26%

20%22%

3% 49%

65%69%

54 - 48%

1.104752

80-100%

50-62%

113 desks


Central Services


Headcount:

desk count:







standing/talking

sitting/talking

individualpHone

individualquiet


sf free > 4H:

area (nia):

26%5%

31%14%

2% 40%

71%72%

69 - 48%

1.243442

40-60%

39-59%

144 desks


Blue Hive


Headcount:

desk count:







standing/talking

sitting/talking

individualpHone

individualquiet


sf free > 4H:

area (nia):

4% 15%

6%19%

2% 20%

73%72%

43 - 67%

1.2695120

60-80%

30-38%

64 desks

51 people6’100 SF

Coley Porter Bell


Headcount:

desk count:







standing/talking

sitting/talking

individualpHone

individualquiet


sf free > 4H:

area (nia):

5%

7%

17%

20%

2% 25%

75%71%

57 - 36%

0.66--

60-80%

62-74%

156 desks


Healthworld


Headcount:

desk count:







standing/talking

sitting/talking

individualpHone

individualquiet


sf free > 4H:

area (nia):

4% 35%

27%17%

3% 59%

67%74%

17 - 58%

1.3982114

80-100%

23-47%

29 desks


Ogilvy Primary Contact


Headcount:

desk count:







standing/talking

sitting/talking

individualpHone

individualquiet


sf free > 4H:

area (nia):

-- 1.16

54%-93

5% 37%

27%21%

3% 35%

67%69%

80-100%

-%

170 desks


Soho Square & Redworks


Headcount:

desk count:







standing/talking

sitting/talking

individualpHone

individualquiet


sf free > 4H:

area (nia):

57%

1.11--

58 -

3% 48%

21% 13%

65%4%

70%73%

80-100%

-%

102 desks

92 people5’823 SF

NEO

HiStory & Future oF tHe WorKPLace

150106_3.4_Case_Study_Presentation© BDG architecture + design Ltd 2014.

51

a Brief history of the Workplace - Moving to agile


2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030

expressthe Brand

reducecosts

encourage Interaction

Increaseflexibility

enhancecommunication

support cultural change

reduce environmental

Impact

attract and retain staff

78

agility: evidence of success


Understanding how people work is leading to a redefinition of the types of space that make a business effective.

79



( Individual Working )


80



( Informal Meeting )


81



( Thinking )


82



( learning )


83



( Phone calls )


84



( socialising )


85



( relaxing )


86



( collaborating )


87



( formal Meeting )


88



( Project Work )


89



( Confidential Work )


90



( conference calls )


91



( Quiet Work )


92



( Pc Work )


93



More PeoPleIn

BeTTer sPace

More coMMunIcaTIon WITh

BeTTer susTaInaBIlITy=

BELIEVING IN DATA

160411_3.5_WPP_GRE© BDG architecture + design Ltd 2016.

72



Riser 3

High

Occupancy levels

Low

average occupancy

44%

average occupancy

56%= IMProVeD WorksPace

uTIlIsaTIon

73



4

Riser 3

9

44

Medium Medium

no of rooms no of rooms

usage % usage % ave occupancyave occupancy

size size

79

= IMProVeD shareD sPace uTIlIsaTIon

74



computer work

on the phone

core activity Type

56%

5%5%

34%37%

3%18%

42%

= IMProVeD MoVeMenT anD InTeracTIon,

WITh PoTenTIal for knoWleDGe Transfer

on the move

interaction

%%

75



desks

meeting rooms

informal meeting area

tea points

communal areas

18%

10%

3% 1% 2%

14%

14%

8%

2% 4%

= IMProVeD coMMunIcaTIon,

reDuceD DIsTracTIon,In DefIneD sPaces

Interaction location

%%

ApplicAtion


BDG/MATHESON WHITELEY / STEERING GROUP MEETING 2 / 01 OCTOBER 2013

SKY TERRACE


Competition Concept - Spatial Character


Competition/Stage-C Concept - Elements

Level 12

Level 13

Roof

WELL- NESS

AMPHITHEATER WORK-

SPACE

MEETING/STUDIO

MEETING/STUDIO

BAR/CAFE

KITCHEN

WINTERGARDEN

PRIVATEDINING

RESTAURANT

BAR

ACCESSIBLE ROOF

PLANT/EQUIPMENT


Design Parameters

3. Planning process

1. Amphitheater means of escape and technical issues

2. Landlord’s rooftop plant

4. Structural requirements


Current Sky-Terrace - Key public views


AMPHITHEATER


How should amphitheater work?

LOWER COSTMORE CONNECTED

LOW PERFORMANCE

HIGHER COSTLESS CONNECTED

HIGH PERFORMANCE

OPEN ENCLOSED

BDG/MATHESON WHITELEY / STEERING GROUP MEETING 2 / 26 SEPTEMBER 2013



LOW PERFORMANCE


HIGH PERFORMANCE

OUTDOORSEATING

150 PEOPLE

OPEN ENCLOSED

• Fully public space• Daylighting - cannot be

easily blacked out• Low/casual occupancy• Acoustically open• Daily use




LOW PERFORMANCE


HIGH PERFORMANCE

OUTDOORSEATING

VILLAGEMEETING

150 PEOPLE 684 - 1200 (MANAGED)

OPEN ENCLOSED




easily blacked out• Heavy occupancy -

managed escape• Acoustically open - can

be amplified electronically• Bi-annually

?




LOW PERFORMANCE


HIGH PERFORMANCE

OUTDOORSEATING

VILLAGEMEETING

INFORMALCONCERT

150 PEOPLE 684 - 1200 (MANAGED) 200 PEOPLE

OPEN ENCLOSED








easily blacked out• Low/casual occupancy• Acoustically open -

but difficult to enhance quality

• Use?

?




LOW PERFORMANCE


HIGH PERFORMANCE

OUTDOORSEATING

VILLAGEMEETING

INFORMALCONCERT

GROUPPRESENTATION

150 PEOPLE 684 - 1200 (MANAGED) 200 PEOPLE 180 PEOPLE

OPEN ENCLOSED










• Use?

• Needs to be private• Daylighting makes

projection difficult• Medium occupancy• Acoustically closed -

needs to be separate from adjacent spaces

• Use?

?




LOW PERFORMANCE


HIGH PERFORMANCE

OUTDOORSEATING

VILLAGEMEETING

INFORMALCONCERT

GROUPPRESENTATION

BLACKBOXTHEATER

150 PEOPLE 684 - 1200 (MANAGED) 200 PEOPLE 180 PEOPLE 150 PEOPLE

OPEN ENCLOSED










• Use?




• Use?




• Use?

?


Amphitheater Enclosure - Fully enclosed (blackbox theater)

WINTER GARDEN

OFFICE

OFFICE

RESTAURANT

KITCHEN

AMPHI- THEATRE

+

High level of acoustic controlFully sealed and serviced environ-ment - no need to manage different uses

-

Limited capacity - 150-200 peopleUnlikely to be used informallyReduced links to wintergarden Higher cost


Amphitheater Enclosure - Semi-enclosed with operable walls

WINTER GARDEN

OFFICE

OFFICE

RESTAURANT

KITCHEN

AMPHI- THEATRE

+

Increases acoustic controlCan function as black-outLess need to manage wintergarden noise if amphitheatre in use

-

Limits openess to winter garden Costly and difficult to engineerLimits use of terrace for lunch seating/informal break-out uses


Amphitheater Enclosure - Open steps with black-out/privacy screen

WINTER GARDEN

OFFICE

OFFICE

RESTAURANT

KITCHEN

AMPHI- THEATRE

+

Lower costGood visual and physical connec-tions to Wintergarden

-

No acoustic separation from adja-cent spacesIf black-out curtain used, noise lev-els of adjacent spaces need to be managed

BDG/MATHESONWHITELEY / SEA CONTAINERS HOUSE / STAGE D DESIGN REPORT / 17TH DECEMBER 2013

Sky Terrace Planning Strategy

VIEWING PLATFORM

INTERNALLANDSCAPING

AMPHITHEATRE

CAFE / BAR

INTERNALLANDSCAPING

EXTERNALRIVER DECK

MEADOW

13

roof terrace Visualisation

141120_SCH_Case_Study© BDG architecture + design Ltd 2014.


Ampitheatre - Open Scenario


Ampitheatre - Enclosed Scenario

41

sea containers - London

160226_WPPGRE_NYC© BDG architecture + design Ltd 2015.

We are an award winning studio of architects and designers.We design inspirational spaces that promote interaction and enjoyment.

5

sea containers

160412_BDG_WorkplaceTrendsTalk_SeaContainers© BDG architecture + design Ltd 2016.


6

Sea Containers




CENTRAL TERRACE


CURRENT STACK FLOORS: LOW & LONG


STACK AS THREE ‘MINI-TOWERS’

CURRENT: WIDE, LOW FLOOR PLATE PROPOSED: THREE MINI-TOWERS CONNECTED BY NEW STAIRS


CREATING INDIVIDUALITY & SENSE OF PLACE


WEST STACK

L12

5’400 SQFT

4’200 SQFT

8’800 SQFT

L11

L10

L9

L8


EAST STACK

L12

5’400 SQFT

4’200 SQFT

8’800 SQFT

L11

L10

L9

L8


CORE STACK

L12

5’400 SQFT

4’200 SQFT

8’800 SQFT

L11

L10

L9

L8


STACK VERTICAL CONNECTIONS

L12

5’400 SQFT

4’200 SQFT

8’800 SQFT

L11

L10

L9

L8

NEW RECEPTIONLEVEL

v

OGILVY GROUP WORKPLACE


SEA CONTAINERS HOUSE: STACK


THE STACK: BRAND NEIGHBOURHOOD


STAIRS CREATE MINI-PLATES: DISTINCT & SMALL

L12

5’400 SQFT

4’200 SQFT

8’800 SQFT

L11

L10

L9

L8

MINI-PLATE


L12

5’400 SQFT

4’200 SQFT

8’800 SQFT

L11

L10

L9

L8

MINI-PLATE

STAIRS CREATE MINI-PLATES: DISTINCT & SMALL


L12

5’400 SQFT

4’200 SQFT

8’800 SQFT

L11

L10

L9

L8

3-LEVELMINI TOWER

STAIRS CREATE MINI-TOWERS: LARGE & WELL INTEGRATED


SHARED VS. BRANDED SPACE

L12

5’400 SQFT

4’200 SQFT

8’800 SQFT

L11

L10

L9

L8

EXPANSIONLEVEL

EXPANSIONLEVEL


BRAND FRONT DOORS


FRONT DOOR FOR EVERY BRAND

L12

5’400 SQFT

4’200 SQFT

8’800 SQFT

L11

L10

L9

L8

F

F

F

F

F

RECEPTION


LANDSCAPED CONNECTIONS WITHIN CORE STACK

1. STRUCTURAL SYSTEM



1. STRUCTURAL SYSTEM2. CUT VOIDS IN SLABBETWEEN STRUCTURE




3. SHIFT SLABS UP & DOWNTO CREATE TERRACE

2. CUT VOIDS IN SLABBETWEEN STRUCTURE




3. SHIFT SLABS UP & DOWNTO CREATE TERRACE

2. CUT VOIDS IN SLABBETWEEN STRUCTURE

4. OCCUPY TERRACEWITH SHARED FACILITIES


STACK OVERVIEW

L12

5’400 SQFT

4’200 SQFT

8’800 SQFT

L11

L10

L9

L8

RECEPTION


Design Parameters

4.5m

0.18

0.25 0.45

0.45

0.35

0.70

0.95

0.88

1.05

0.88

1.23

4.5 m ESCAPE OFFSET FROM HOLEMINIMUM CUT AROUND STRUCTURE

ACTIVITIES ALIGNED WITH RISER HEIGHTS

Ogilvy & Mather Sea Containers House Enabling Works Stage D Report

231961/Rep/SMEP/001 | Issue 1 | 19 September 2013 J:\200000\231900\231961-00 SEA CONTAINERS HOUSE\4 INTERNAL DATA\05 REPORTS\07 STRUCTURAL\130918 SCH ENABLING WORKS STAGE D REPORT.DOCX

Page 9

4.2.2 Openings in the Centre The openings in the central stack are worthy of separate consideration from those in the wings in that they are larger, and also are close to the building’s façade.

In general, the procedures for forming these openings will be as per the wings. As can be seen from Figure 8, the boundary conditions around the opening are, however, different from the openings in the wings.

On the east and west sides of the openings, the condition is as per the wings. On the south side, a 1.5 m cantilever is to be formed from where the slab is cut. Assessment of the existing structural system indicates that a cantilever of this length is acceptable without additional strengthening works.

On the north side, a 1.0 m offset from the fin column has been allowed for in order to minimise any interference with the façade and its support. This will

Figure 7: Column to Beam Connection

Figure 8: Typical Central Stack Opening

35




36




37




38




4

sea containers



42





RIVER TERRACE


STRUCTURE DEFINES CHARACTER


QUALITY = SUBSTANCE + SURFACE

ELIZABETH HOUSE = LIGHT STRUCTURE SEA CONTAINERS HOUSE = HEAVY STRUCTURE

40 X VOLUME OF CONCRETE


RAW AND COOKED ARCHITECTURE

RAW OVER- COOKED

SUSTAINABLE

COST EFFECTIVE

MORE ENERGIZED

KEEP VISIBLE HISTORYOF SEA CONTAINERSS

AVOID BANALITY OF CONVENTIONAL

CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS


LARGE SCALE FLOOR PLATES

85 M


SCATTERED OBJECTS CREATE A RANGE OF SCALES & SPACES

OPEN STUDIOTERRACE

PRIVATE

PRIVATEPRIVATE

VIEW

ME

ETI

NG


L1 FLOOR PLAN


RIVER TERRACE FLOOR PLATE


RIVER TERRACE SPACE SYNTAX

High

Integration levels

Low

7

sea containers



8

sea containers



40




12

sea containers



39




INVESTING IN PEOPLE, NOT JUST SPACE


60

Investing in People, Not just Space


CHANGE PROGRAMME

Change Champions&

Focus Groups

• Strategy & Design (Agility)• Facilities

• Hospitality• IT & Technology

• Etiquette• Relocation & Welcome

19



#blazenewtrails

20



#blazenewtrails#amazing

21




22




#agileworking

23




#agileworking

24




#agileworking

25




#agileworking#nice

26




#agileworking#nice

27




#agileworking#nice

28




#agileworking#nice

29




#agileworking#nice

#sogreat

30




#agileworking#nice

#sogreat

31




#agileworking#nice

#sogreat

32




#agileworking#nice

#sogreat#lovethis

33




#agileworking#nice

#sogreat#lovethis

34




#agileworking#nice

#sogreat#lovethis

35




#agileworking#nice

#sogreat#lovethis

#newbeginnings

36




#agileworking#nice

#sogreat#lovethis

#newbeginnings

37




#agileworking#nice

#sogreat#lovethis

#newbeginnings

38




#agileworking#nice

#sogreat#lovethis

#newbeginnings#lookingamazing

40




#agileworking#nice

#sogreat#lovethis

#newbeginnings#lookingamazing

41




#agileworking#nice

#sogreat#lovethis

#newbeginnings#lookingamazing#whatsnottolike

42




#agileworking#nice

#sogreat#lovethis


43




#agileworking#nice

#sogreat#lovethis


© BDG architecture + design Ltd 2014. This document and the ideas incorporated herein, as an instrument of professional service, is the property of BDG architecture + design Ltd and is not to be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever, in whole or part for any other project without prior written permission from BDG architecture + design Ltd.

Moving to Sea Containers - The MEC Experience

Real Estate

Transcript of Moving to Sea Containers - The MEC Experience