Moths on farmland: changes in diversity and abundance under Entry
Transcript of Moths on farmland: changes in diversity and abundance under Entry
![Page 1: Moths on farmland: changes in diversity and abundance under Entry](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081622/613d6480736caf36b75ccad1/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Moths on farmland: changes in
diversity and abundance under
Entry Level Stewardship
MARC BOTHAM, MATTHEW HEARD, JOHN REDHEAD & RICHARD
PYWELL
![Page 2: Moths on farmland: changes in diversity and abundance under Entry](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081622/613d6480736caf36b75ccad1/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
FARMLAND & BIODIVERSITY
• 70%+ UK is agricultural land
• Farmland biodiversity has been shown to be
declining
Robinson & Sutherland (2002) Journal of Applied Ecology 39: 157-176
![Page 3: Moths on farmland: changes in diversity and abundance under Entry](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081622/613d6480736caf36b75ccad1/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
AGRI-ENVIRONMENT SCHEMES
• Major aim of these schemes is to mitigate
biodiversity loss
• The effectiveness of these schemes has been
mixed and evidence for benefits equivocal
• Eg Kleijn et al (2006)
• Major reason is the way in which AES are
assessed (Kleijn & Sutherland, 2003)
• Eg No baselines, low replicates, inadequate study
design
Kleijn et al (2006) Ecology Letters 9: 243-254
Kleijn & Sutherland (2003). Journal of Applied Ecology 40: 947-969
![Page 4: Moths on farmland: changes in diversity and abundance under Entry](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081622/613d6480736caf36b75ccad1/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
HILLESDEN FARM EXPERIMENT
1000 ha of lowland
arable farmland in
central England
Entered ELS in
2005/2006
Defra and CEH led: randomised block experiment to evaluate and
demonstrate the cost-effectiveness of Environmental Stewardship
options in conserving and enhancing biodiversity at the farm scale
![Page 5: Moths on farmland: changes in diversity and abundance under Entry](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081622/613d6480736caf36b75ccad1/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
HILLESDEN FARM EXPERIMENT
5 blocks Cross Compliance
(CC): control – minimum
farming environmental
requirements
Entry Level
Stewardship (ELS): 1%
land for wildlife habitat
Entry Level
Stewardship extra
(ELSX): 5% land for
wildlife habitat
![Page 6: Moths on farmland: changes in diversity and abundance under Entry](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081622/613d6480736caf36b75ccad1/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
SURVEYING MOTHS AT HILLESDEN
SURVEYS: Trapped each year in May and again in July 2006-2010 (5yrs). - one block per night trapped - 125w MV Robinson traps placed in the margin of each treatment All moths recorded (macros and micros)
Three main questions 1. Does moth abundance and diversity differ between the different
treatments? 2. What effect is there of ELS on overall moth abundance and diversity at
the farm-scale? 3. How does the landscape affect moth abundance and diversity in field
margins?
![Page 7: Moths on farmland: changes in diversity and abundance under Entry](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081622/613d6480736caf36b75ccad1/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
MOTHS AND AES
• Merckx et al (2009-2010): AES benefit moths
• wide margins and hedgerow trees*
• significant on targeted farms
• Hedgerow trees especially important for less mobile species
• Fuentes-Montemayor et al (2011): AES benefit macro- and micro-moths compared to conventional farms
• Especially micro moths
Merckx et al (2009) Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 130:177-182
Merckx et al (2010) Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 138: 147-151
Fuentes-Montemayor et al (2011) Journal of Applied Ecology 48: 532-542
![Page 8: Moths on farmland: changes in diversity and abundance under Entry](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081622/613d6480736caf36b75ccad1/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Farm-scale changes
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
No
. m
oth
s (
log
10
)
2006 2010 2006 2010 2006 2010
Macro-moths Micro-moths BAP-moths
(i)
01
02
03
04
0
No
. sp
ecie
s
2006 2010 2006 2010 2006 2010
Macro-moths Micro-moths BAP-moths
(ii)
***
*** **
**
***
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
No
. m
oth
s (
log
10
)
2006 2010 2006 2010 2006 2010
Macro-moths Micro-moths BAP-moths
(i)
01
02
03
04
0
No
. sp
ecie
s
2006 2010 2006 2010 2006 2010
Macro-moths Micro-moths BAP-moths
(ii)
***
*** **
**
***
Abundance Species richness
Counted over 30,000 moths
of over 600 species
![Page 9: Moths on farmland: changes in diversity and abundance under Entry](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081622/613d6480736caf36b75ccad1/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Farm-scale changes – weather effects
Accounting for
temperature and
rainfall:
Small Square-spot Diarsia rubi
Large Nutmeg Apamea anceps
![Page 10: Moths on farmland: changes in diversity and abundance under Entry](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081622/613d6480736caf36b75ccad1/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Treatment effects?
Pictures from ukmoths.org.uk
Treatment Response Macro-moths Micro-moths BAP-moths
ELS
vs CC
Abundance ELS>CC ELS>CC ELS<CC
α-diversity ELS>CC ELS>CC ELS<CC
ELSX
vs CC
Abundance ELSX>CC ELSX>CC*** ELSX>CC
α-diversity ELSX>CC ELSX>CC* ELSX>CC
ELSX
vs ELS
Abundance ELSX>ELS ELSX>ELS** ELSX>ELS
α-diversity ELSX>ELS ELSX>ELS ELSX>ELS
Large numbers of specialist micros that feed in
seed heads eg. Cochylimorpha straminea & Aethes
smeathmaniana
![Page 11: Moths on farmland: changes in diversity and abundance under Entry](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081622/613d6480736caf36b75ccad1/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Scale: landscape?
CC ELS ELSX ELSX NM
100 m
250 m
500 m
1 km
Mobile species attracted from
nearby habitats
Treatments too close together
Ubiquitous presence of hedgerows
and hedgerow trees
Crop Woody plants Grasses Herb-rich
![Page 12: Moths on farmland: changes in diversity and abundance under Entry](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081622/613d6480736caf36b75ccad1/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
SUMMARY & CONCLUSIONS
• ELS is likely to benefit moths
• UK BAP species have increased
• After poor years nationally moth numbers are increasing at farm-scale
• Both ES margin types increased abundance and diversity of moths compared to cross compliance
• Type of margins are important
• ELSX increases abundance and diversity of all moths and significantly micro-moths compared to ELS standard
• Highlights need for longer-term monitoring and consideration of landscape
![Page 13: Moths on farmland: changes in diversity and abundance under Entry](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022081622/613d6480736caf36b75ccad1/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Acknowledgements
In the field: Nick Greatorex-Davies, Bill Meek, John
Redhead
Farm manager: Richard Franklin
At CEH: Richard Pywell, Matthew Heard, Stephen
Freeman