Morvern Community Development Hydro (MCDH)...P649 MCDH Hydro HD/TP/AJV March 2013 P649 MCDH...

Morvern Community Development Hydro

(MCDH)

Prefeasibility Report

March 2013

A report for Morvern Community Development Company

Hydroplan UK Fort William, Highlands Wimborne, Dorset Cullybackey, Co. Antrim Tel: 01202 886622 Email: [email protected]

P649 MCDH Hydro HD/TP/AJV March 2013

P649 MCDH Prefeasibility Report r2.doc 2

CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Site Characteristics 2.1 Site Survey

2.2 Scheme 1 – Allt Achadh Forsa 2.3 Scheme 2 – Allt a Choirs 2.4 Scheme 3 – Allt a Bhioda 2.5 Scheme 4 – Allt an Aoinidh Mhoir 2.6 Scheme 5 – Barr River

3. Technical and Environmental Considerations 3.1 Technical Parameters

3.2 Grid Assessment 3.2 Environmental Considerations

4. Economic Viability 4.1 Option Costs

4.2 Economic Assessment 5. Discussion 5.1 Conclusions

5.2 Next Steps

Appendix: Site Drawings



1 Introduction In November 2012 Hydroplan undertook a desktop assessment of hydro potential within the Forestry Commission land in Fiunary Forest, Morvern, and subsequently successfully tendered for conducting a prefeasibility study and risk evaluation for Phase 1, scope as identified in the tender invitation. A site survey was conducted over two days (15th & 16th January 2013). This report is a brief pre-feasibility report based on this preliminary site visit. The scope of the study includes the following: • Establish flow rates through hydrology based on industry based software • Undertake head measurement using handheld GPS and from maps • Provide an estimate of Power, the Average Annual Energy Production (AAEP)

for each scheme using an in-house computer programme, FDCENG. (The accuracy of these estimates is approximately +/- 20%, which will improve when more site data is collated and will be outlined any running constraints as well)

• Provide an estimate of CAPEX with accuracy of +-30% and OPEX • Consider and report on any readily identifiable environmental issues which

could alter the scheme economics • Provide a report (including schematic diagrams of the key elements)

summarising the schemes • Undertake an informal Grid Assessment (based on knowledge of the area)

A brief commentary on the various schemes and their main components is given in Sections 2.2 to 2.6. Section 3 provides an outline of the technical parameters and environmental considerations. Section 4 considers the scheme costs and economic viability and Section 5 provides a summary and proposed Next Steps. The scheme layout with the intake and powerhouse positions is presented in the Appendix A of this report.

2 Site Characteristics

2.1 Site Survey During the site survey, as many of the scheme components were visited as possible. Here follows a brief commentary on each scheme’s components.

2.2 Scheme 1 - Allt Achadh Forsa Intakes In addition to the intake position Int1-1 as marked in the desktop study, a new intake position Int1-0 was identified at the lower reach. Similarly, in addition to intake position Int1-1a, a new intake position Int1-1b was identified in the upper reach of this burn. All identified intake positions are good with bedrock available. Int1-0, which catches all tributaries, is located at approximately 102m AOD and Int1-1 at 223m AOD.



There were two existing intake structures identified on the Allt Achadh Forsa. The upper structure is the Scottish Water supply intake currently providing water supply to Lochaline. Therefore a higher than the normal compensation flow would be required from the Int1-1 to ensure normal operation of this intake at all times. The lower structure previously serviced the nearby mine with water, but is no longer in use. The other proposed minor intakes Int1-2, Int1-3 and Int1-4 were not visited specifically as the watercourses & catchments appeared too small. It is possible that they could accommodate a simple prefabricated intake structure if required, but for the purposes of this study these intakes have been discarded. Pipeline The pipeline route from each identified intake appears buildable. A more detailed assessment, with trial pits, could further refine the route.

Powerhouse Two possible powerhouse positions were identified: PH1 at the lower boundary of the forestry block, at approximately 69mAOD; and PH1a, on Ardtornish Estate land adjacent to the shore at approximately 30mAOD. PH1 is the simplest position and has been used in this study. PH1a would provide additional head, but is technically difficult due to the steep ravine nature of the topography.

2.3 Scheme 2 - Allt a Choirs Intake The proposed intake Int2 has been moved slightly upstream in comparison to the desktop study to approximately 110m AOD. The pipe exit is possible from both banks. Pipeline The pipeline could descend either on the left bank of the right bank. The left bank is through predominantly commercial forest; the RB is beside an existing forestry track before descending through lower grade commercial forest. The decision would probably be influenced by the felling plan, but for the sake of this study the left bank has been selected. Powerhouse The proposed powerhouse position PH2 is at approximately 23mAOD. Options exist on both the left bank and right bank.

2.4 Scheme 3 - Allt a Bhioda

Intake The proposed intake positions Int3-1 and Int3-2 have been moved slightly upstream to approximately 74m AOD by an existing forestry track. The pipe exit is possible from both LB and RB. In addition to those two upper intakes, another single intake position Int3-1a has been identified further downstream at approximately 60mAOD. Again the pipe exit is possible from both LB and RB.



Pipeline The pipeline route is buildable but is rather long for such a small scheme, which may render it uneconomical. Powerhouse The proposed powerhouse position PH3 at approximately 33mAOD is reasonable position on the left bank.

2.5 Scheme 4 - Allt an Aoinidh Mhoir Intake The proposed intake Int-4 can be easily located beside an existing forestry track. The pipe exit is possible from either the left bank or the right bank. Pipeline The pipeline route is relatively easy but as on Scheme 3 may be rendered uneconomical because of its length. The pipeline on scheme 4 also runs in close proximity to an area of archaeological significance (the old township), which would have to be carefully considered. Powerhouse The proposed powerhouse position PH4 at approximately 21mAOD is reasonable on the left bank.

2.6 Scheme 5 - Barr River Intakes In addition to the proposed intakes (Int5-1 and 5-2) at the upper reach of each tributary of the Barr River (as identified in the desktop analysis) intake positions (Int5-1a and 5-2a) were identified slightly downstream on each burn. Intake 5-1 is located at approximately 187m AOD. There is good bedrock although the structure would entail long wing walls, and the pipe exit is reasonably constrained for about 40m immediately downstream. Intake 5-2 is located at approximately 182m AOD. Again there is good bedrock, although the structure would require large excavation for the pipe exit or a significant height structure. Intake 5-1a located at approximately 156m AOD, and is a good location with an easy pipe exit on the right bank. Intake 5-2a located at approximately 148m AOD, and is a good location with easy pipe exit on the right bank. Pipeline The pipelines have associated difficulties with the pipe exit on the upper intakes, but despite this, it is possible with benching and stabilisation. Beyond this, the pipeline routes appear to be not too difficult.



Powerhouse There are three possible powerhouse positions: PH5 at approximately 53mAOD, PH5a beside the shore at approximately 8mAOD and PH5b at approximately 58mAOD. PH5 is located between the tributaries and has a few meters extra head than the PH5b position which is on the RB. An extra road and pipe bridges would be required for accessing PH5. PH5b is by far the easiest option and would result in the shortest pipe route. PH5a is located close to the sea and could be location on ether bank with several good positions with bedrock and pools for water return. However, being close to the shore at the bottom end of the river there is likely to be significant fisheries concerns. PH5a does though provide some extra head of ~50m, but with a significantly longer pipeline.



3 Technical and Environmental Considerations 3.1 Technical Parameters

A summary of the proposed layout of each individual scheme is shown in the revised Scheme Layout (Drawing No. P649 10001 r0) presented in Appendix A. An estimate of the Average Annual Energy Production (AAEP) has been made based on the Low Flows Enterprise (LFE) hydrology programme. Variable compensation flows have been considered in this analysis, which has a significant impact on the AAEP. The technical parameters of each scheme and their respective options are presented in Table 3.1, 3-2, 3-3 and 3-4 below and overleaf. Table 3.1 – Technical Parameters (Scheme 1)

Scheme/Burn Scheme 1 Allt Achadh Forsa Options 1 2 3 3a 4 4a Intake and PH Int1+PH1 Int1-1+PH1 Int1-1a+PH1 Int1-1b+PH1 Catchment (km²) 3.59 2.54 2.15 2.15 1.88 1.88 Mean Annual Runoff (mm) 1880 1907 1918 1918 1926 1926 Mean Flow (m³/s) 0.214 0.154 0.131 0.131 0.115 0.115 Qmean multiple 1.5 1.5 1.5 0.9 1.5 0.86 Design Flow (m³/s) 0.321 0.230 0.196 0.118 0.172 0.099 Intake Elevation (mAOD) 102 123 190 190 200 200 Powerhouse Elevation (mAOD) 69 69 69 69 69 69 Gross Head (m) 33 54 121 121 131 131 Pipeline Length (m) 400 730 1590 1590 1640 1640 Installed Power (kW) 78 90 171 100 174 100 Load Factor % 29.04% 29.35% 29.29% 38.30% 29.54% 38.87%

Table 3.2– Technical Parameters (Schemes 2, 3 and 4)

Scheme/Burn Scheme 2

Allt a Choirs

Scheme 3 Allt a Bhioda

Scheme 4 Allt na Aoinidh Mhoir

Options 1 1 2 1 2

Intake and PH Int2+PH2 Int3-1a+PH3

Int3-1+3-2+PH3 Int4+PH4

Catchment (km²) 1.41 1.32 0.61 1.33 1.33 Mean Annual Runoff (mm) 2115 2147 2167 2225 2225 Mean Flow (m³/s) 0.095 0.090 0.042 0.094 0.094 Qmean multiple 1.5 0.8 1.2 1.5 0.4 Design Flow (m³/s) 0.142 0.075 0.049 0.141 0.038 Intake Elevation (mAOD) 110 60 74 73 73 Powerhouse Elevation (mAOD) 23 33 33 21 21 Gross Head (m) 87 27 41 53 53 Pipeline Length (m) 1050 550 970 750 750 Installed Power (kW) 92 15 15 55 15 Load Factor % 28.84% 38.88% 33.31% 28.83% 50.21%



Table 3.3 – Technical Parameters (Scheme 5)

Scheme/Burn Scheme 5 Barr River Options 1 1a 2 2a

Intake and PH Int5-1+5-2 +PH5b

Int5-1+5-2 +PH5b

Int5-1+5-2 +PH5

Int5-1+5-2 +PH5

Catchment (km²) 8.41 8.41 8.41 8.41 Mean Annual Runoff (mm) 2109 2109 2109 2109 Mean Flow (m³/s) 0.562 0.562 0.562 0.562 Qmean multiple 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.0 Design Flow (m³/s) 0.843 0.562 0.843 0.540 Intake Elevation (mAOD) 182 182 182 182 Powerhouse Elevation (mAOD) 58 58 53 53 Gross Head (m) 124 124 129 129 Pipeline Length (m) 3110 3110 3160 3160 Installed Power (kW) 754 500 784 500 Load Factor % 29.42% 36.40% 29.42% 37.08%

Table 3.4 – Technical Parameters (Scheme 5 cont)

Scheme/Burn Scheme 5 Barr River Options 3 4 5 6

Intake and PH Int5-1a+5-2a +PH5b

Int5-1a+5-2a +PH5

Int5-1+5-2 +PH5a

Int5-1a+5-2a +PH5a

Catchment (km²) 9.71 9.71 8.41 9.71 Mean Annual Runoff (mm) 2095 2095 2109 2095 Mean Flow (m³/s) 0.645 0.645 0.562 0.645 Qmean multiple 1.2 1.13 1.5 1.5 Design Flow (m³/s) 0.774 0.729 0.843 0.968 Intake Elevation (mAOD) 148 148 182 148 Powerhouse Elevation (mAOD) 58 53 8 8 Gross Head (m) 90 95 174 140 Pipeline Length (m) 2300 2350 4030 3220 Installed Power (kW) 500 500 1058 977 Load Factor % 33.36% 34.29% 29.42% 29.45%

3.2 Grid Assessment

Scheme 1 Scheme 1 capacity varies from 78kW - 174kW depending on option selected. The powerhouse is situated nearby the 33kV overhead line running beside the A884 to Lochaline. Schemes 2, 3, 4 & 5 Schemes 2, 3, 4 & 5 capacities vary from 15kW – 1220kW depending on number of schemes developed and option selected. Each scheme’s powerhouse nearest distribution point is the 11kV twin phase line running beside Loch Arienas to Loch Teacuis. This line could possible accommodate a small scheme (i.e. Scheme 3 or 4) but the larger schemes (i.e. Scheme 2 and 5) or the cumulative effect of all schemes, would necessitate a significant upgrade to the current overhead line that serves Loch Teacuis. There may also be further strengthening required on the 33kV line that serves Lochaline and Scheme 1. Considering this, there may be synergies applying individually or co-operatively with neighbours for these schemes.



3.3 Environmental Considerations From an initial search and general enquiry, the following environmental considerations are noted: -

• The proposed schemes are not within any designations but are close to Loch Sunart SSSI and SAC.

• Some of the rivers flow directly into the sea, hence there are likely to be migratory salmon and sea trout in the lower reaches of the some of the burns. However, this would need to be confirmed by a fisheries survey.

• Most of the schemes are within forestry hence the surrounding habitat is likely to be poor. Having said these habitats often contain pockets of rare species and can be support good habitat for protected mammals and birds.

• Most of the scheme elements are well hidden from view and the visual impact of the scheme would be small.

Although the above suggests that the schemes would have a minimal impact on the environment, it is expected that the usual environmental surveys will be required: -

• Archaeology • Habitat • Fisheries • Protected Mammals • Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA) • Access & Traffic • FWPM • Bryophytes • Birds (possibly)

However, unless these produce an unexpected find, it is anticipated that planning permission should be relatively easy to achieve. Early negotiation with SEPA and SNH is recommended in order to identify any showstoppers early on the development of the project.



4 Economic Viability

4.1 Basis of Costing Project costing is largely dependant on the method of contracting the schemes. If a developer wants a “hands off” approach then he might opt for a “turnkey” contract and so would expect to pay more for this. Alternatively, a “DIY” approach would be somewhat less overall cost. The costing represented in the tables below are mid-range using relatively small but experienced contractors.

4.2 Option Costs The capital expenditures (CAPEX) of the selected options are presented in Tables 4.1, 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4 below. Table 4.1 – Option costs (Scheme 1)

Scheme/Burn Scheme 1 – Allt Achadh Forsa Options 1 2 3 3a 4 4a Installed Power (kW) 78 90 171 100 174 100 Civil Works Intake costs £45k £45k £45k £40k £40k £36k Pipe laying civil works £21k £35k £87k £72k £95k £73k Pipe supply £28k £47k £115k £94k £126k £96k Powerhouse and tailrace £90k £90k £120k £90k £120k £90k

Misc. (Construction access track, signal cable, reinstatement) £21k £34k £68k £68k £70k £70k

Steel works supply £10k £13k £22k £18k £23k £18k Unpriced civil Items 10% £21k £26k £46k £38k £47k £38k Civil Contractor Prelims 15% £27k £31k £48k £40k £49k £40k E&M Turbine incl. Generator £135k £135k £175k £145k £175k £145k P&C and Cabling etc Unpriced E&M 10% £14k £14k £18k £15k £18k £15k Grid Connection SSE cost sum £25k £25k £25k £26k £25k £26k Private cable £17k £17k £17k £17k £17k £17k Unpriced grid and electrical etc 10% £4k £4k £4k £4k £4k £4k Design, Plan and Manage Planning and Development £40k £40k £65k £40k £65k £40k Post Planning & Commercial Close Costs £10k £10k £10k £10k £10k £10k

Civil Design & Proj Man £45k £45k £45k £45k £45k £45k E&M Design & Proj Man £35k £35k £35k £35k £35k £35k Project Option Cost £587k £645k £944k £797k £963k £797k Contingency % 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% Contingency £ £88k £97k £142k £120k £144k £120k Total Project Cost £675k £742k £1,085k £917k £1,107k £917k



Table 4.2 – Option costs (Scheme 2, 3 and 4)


– Allt a Choirs

Scheme 3 – Allt a Bhioda

Scheme 4 – Allt na Aoinidh Mhoir

Options 1 1 2 1 2 Installed Power (kW) 92 15 15 55 15 Civil Works Intake costs £42k £18k £12k £33k £18k Pipe laying civil works £39k £20k £27k £39k £20k Pipe supply £52k £12k £16k £12k £11k Powerhouse and tailrace £120k £20k £20k £20k £20k

Misc. (Construction access track, signal cable, reinstatement) £46k £16k £24k £31k £31k

Steel works supply £22k £4k £5k £7k £5k Unpriced civil Items 10% £32k £9k £10k £14k £10k Civil Contractor Prelims 15% £37k £11k £13k £18k £13k E&M Turbine incl. Generator £135k £25k £25k £110k £25k P&C and Cabling etc Unpriced E&M 10% £14k £3k £3k £11k £3k Grid Connection SSE cost sum £25k £0k £0k £20k £0k Private cable £17k £5k £5k £5k £5k Unpriced grid and electrical etc 10% £4k £1k £1k £3k £1k Design, Plan and Manage Planning and Development £40k £10k £10k £40k £40k Post Planning & Commercial Close Costs £10k £2k £2k £2k £2k

Civil Design & Proj Man £45k £15k £15k £20k £15k E&M Design & Proj Man £35k £5k £5k £15k £5k Project Option Cost £714k £175k £192k £399k £223k Contingency % 15.0% 5% 5% 15.0% 5.0% Contingency £ £107k £9k £10k £60k £11k Total Project Cost £822k £184k £202k £459k £234k



Table 4.3 – Option costs (Scheme 5)

Scheme/Burn Scheme 5 – Barr River Options 1 1a 2 2a Installed Power (kW) 754 500 784 500 Civil Works Intake costs £173k £173k £173k £173k Pipe laying civil works £195k £139k £201k £143k Pipe supply £399k £286k £412k £295k Powerhouse and tailrace £210k £190k £220k £200k

Misc. (Construction access track, signal cable, reinstatement) £209k £209k £245k £245k

Steel works supply £89k £75k £94k £79k Unpriced civil Items 10% £127k £107k £134k £114k Civil Contractor Prelims 15% £118k £107k £126k £114k E&M Turbine incl. Generator £371k £330k £376k £330k P&C and Cabling etc £120k £120k £120k £120k Unpriced E&M 10% £49k £45k £50k £45k Grid Connection SSE cost sum £45k £45k £45k £45k Private cable £266k £266k £275k £275k Unpriced grid and electrical etc 10% £31k £31k £32k £32k Design, Plan and Manage Planning and Development £85k £85k £85k £85k Post Planning & Commercial Close Costs £35k £25k £35k £25k

Civil Design & Proj Man £75k £75k £90k £90k E&M Design & Proj Man £65k £65k £65k £65k Project Option Cost £2,661k £2,371k £2,777k £2,474k Contingency % 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% Contingency £ £399k £356k £416k £371k Total Project Cost £3,060k £2,727k £3,193k £2,845k



Table 4.4 – Option costs (Scheme 5 cont)

Scheme/Burn Scheme 5 – Barr River Options 3 4 5 6 Installed Power (kW) 500 500 1058 977 Civil Works Intake costs £159k £159k £173k £175k Pipe laying civil works £146k £141k £316k £267k Pipe supply £300k £290k £708k £598k Powerhouse and tailrace £190k £200k £275k £275k

Misc. (Construction access track, signal cable, reinstatement) £181k £217k £240k £212k

Steel works supply £73k £76k £128k £115k Unpriced civil Items 10% £105k £108k £184k £164k Civil Contractor Prelims 15% £101k £108k £151k £139k E&M Turbine incl. Generator £330k £330k £535k £523k P&C and Cabling etc £120k £120k £160k £160k Unpriced E&M 10% £45k £45k £70k £68k Grid Connection SSE cost sum £45k £45k £80k £80k Private cable £266k £275k £221k £221k Unpriced grid and electrical etc 10% £31k £32k £30k £30k Design, Plan and Manage Planning and Development £85k £85k £125k £125k Post Planning & Commercial Close Costs £25k £25k £50k £50k

Civil Design & Proj Man £75k £90k £110k £110k E&M Design & Proj Man £65k £65k £85k £85k Project Option Cost £2,343k £2,411k £3,641k £3,398k Contingency % 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% Contingency £ £351k £362k £546k £510k Total Project Cost £2,695k £2,773k £4,187k £3,908k



4.3 Economic Assessment Energy price In the assessment below, the FIT rates used are

• £166/MWh for schemes greater than 500kW • £200/MWh for schemes between 100kW and 500kW • £241/MWh for schemes between 15kW and 100kW • £255/MWh for schemes less than 15kW.

Economics Tables 4.5 – 4.8 provide a summary of each scheme and their options. Table 4.5 – Options economics (Scheme 1)

Scheme/Burn Scheme 1 – Allt Achadh Forsa Options 1 2 3 3a 4 4a Installed Power (kW) 78 90 171 100 174 100 CAPEX £675k £742k £1,085k £917k £1,107k £917k AAEP (MWh) 198 231 439 336 450 341 Tariff £/MWh 241 241 200 241 200 241 Gross Income £48k £56k £88k £81k £90k £82k Operation and Maintenance £10k £10k £15k £13k £15k £13k

Nett Income £38k £46k £73k £68k £75k £69k Simple payback years 17.8 16.2 14.9 13.5 14.7 13.3

Table 4.6 – Options economics (Schemes 2, 3 and 4)


– Allt a Choirs

Scheme 3 – Allt a Bhioda

Scheme 4 – Allt na Aoinidh Mhoir

Options 1 1 2 1 2 Installed Power (kW) 92 15 15 55 15 CAPEX £822k £184k £202k £459k £234k AAEP (MWh) 232 51 44 139 66 Tariff £/MWh 241 255 255 255 255 Gross Income £56k £13k £11k £35k £17k Operation and Maintenance £10k £2k £2k £8k £2k

Nett Income £46k £11k £9k £28k £15k Simple payback years 17.9 16.7 22.1 16.4 15.8

Table 4.7 – Options economics (Scheme 5)

Scheme/Burn Scheme 5 – Barr River Options 1 1a 2 2a Installed Power (kW) 754 500 784 500 CAPEX £3,060k £2,727k £3,193k £2,845k AAEP (MWh) 1943 1594 2021 1624 Tariff £/MWh 166 200 166 200 Gross Income £323k £319k £335k £325k Operation and Maintenance £32k £28k £32k £28k

Nett Income £291k £291k £303k £297k Simple payback years 10.5 9.4 10.5 9.6



Table 4.8 – Options economics (Scheme 5 cont)

Scheme/Burn Scheme 5 – Barr River Options 3 4 5 6 Installed Power (kW) 500 500 1058 977 CAPEX £2,695k £2,773k £4,187k £3,908k AAEP (MWh) 1461 1502 2727 2520 Tariff £/MWh 200 200 166 166 Gross Income £292k £300k £453k £418k Operation and Maintenance £28k £28k £48k £45k

Nett Income £264k £272k £405k £373k Simple payback years 10.2 10.2 10.3 10.5

5 Discussion

5.1 Conclusion

There is reasonable opportunity for hydro development on the Forestry Commission land in Fiunary Forest, Morvern for a community project, which the community development company may wish to consider further. The opportunities are summarised below. Scheme 1 appears a good opportunity to progress a small 100kW scheme and is advantageously near to the community and the distribution network in Lochaline, but the supply to the Scottish water intake would have to be carefully defended.

Scheme 2 is the simplest 100kW scheme available for development by the community company, but would rely heavily on a grid upgrade. Scheme 3 is a relatively poor scheme with a long pipeline, but might not require a grid upgrade, which could make it attractive. Scheme 4 is a relatively poor scheme with a long pipeline and due to the archaeological significance in the area may be best discarded. Scheme 5 is the largest opportunity to progress a 500 or 1000kW scheme, but does come with the challenges and costs of a larger scheme, and relies heavily on a grid upgrade in the area.

5.2 Next Steps

• Consider applying for grid capacity for Scheme 1 • Consider applying individually or co-operatively with neighbours for a grid

connection with SSE for some or all of Schemes 2, 3, 4 & 5 Pending the outcome of these applications,

• Establish a gauging station on each burn and commence flow monitoring as

soon as possible • Undertake topographic survey of the intake and powerhouse to confirm head

and layout • Refine the Average Annual Energy Production (AAEP) and budget costing

once some gauged flow data is available.



APPENDICES Appendix A • Drawing No. P649 10001 r0 – Scheme Layout • Drawing No. P649 10002 r0 – Environmental Designations

Project No Drawing No Issue

Scale Original Size

A3

Prints from this drawing are

unless otherwise indicated

UNCONTROLLED

Copyright - this drawing is sent to you in confidence,and remains the property of Hydroplan UK. It must not

be copied or disclosed to third parties without permission.

C

Unit 12, Riverside Park, Station RoadWimborne, Dorset, BH21 1QU. ENGLAND

Tel: ++44 (0)1202 886622 Fax: ++44 (0)1202 886609Email: [email protected]

Project Title

Drawing Title

Client

2012

1P649

SCHEME LAYOUT

MORVERN COMMUNITYHYDRO

MORVERN COMMUNITYDEVELOPMENT COMPANY

10001

1 : 62,500

Scale Bar

0m 625 1250 1875 2500 3125

Iss Description Drawn Chk’d Date

Map © Crown copyright. All rights reserved. Licence No. 100032221

OS Grid RefNM 500610

Legend

Powerhouse

Pipeline

Intake

Scheme 1 - Allt Achadh Forsa

Scheme 2 - Allt a Choirs

Scheme 3 - Allt a Bhioda

Scheme 4 - Allt na Aoinidh Mhoir

Scheme 5 - Barr River Int 5-1

Int 5-2

PH 5a

Int 4

PH 4

PH 3

Int 3-1

Int 3-2

Int 2

PH 2

Int 1-1a

Int 1-1b

Int 1-1

Int 1-0

PH 5

PH 1

Int 3-1a

Int 5-1a

Int 5-2b

Ph5b

0 Revisions - Formerly PE1875 10001 r1 08.02.13BT AV

Project No Drawing No Issue

Scale Original Size

A3

Prints from this drawing are

unless otherwise indicated

UNCONTROLLED

Copyright - this drawing is sent to you in confidence,and remains the property of Hydroplan UK. It must not

be copied or disclosed to third parties without permission.

C

Unit 12, Riverside Park, Station RoadWimborne, Dorset, BH21 1QU. ENGLAND

Tel: ++44 (0)1202 886622 Fax: ++44 (0)1202 886609Email: [email protected]

Project Title

Drawing Title

Client

2013

0P649 10002

1 : 62,500

ENVIRONMENTALDESIGNATIONS

MORVERN COMMUNITYHYDRO

MORVERN COMMUNITYDEVELOPMENT COMPANY

Iss Description Drawn Chk’d Date

0 Original Drawing Issue 14.02.13NF -

Map © Crown copyright. All rights reserved. Licence No. 100032221

OS Grid RefNM 500610

0m 625 1250 1875 2500 3125

Woodland Grant Scheme Mk2

Ancient Woodland

Scheduled Monument

Site of Special Scientific Interest

Special Area of Conservation

LEGEND

Powerhouse

Buried Pipeline

Intake

Scheme Layout

SFGS Scheme Boundary

Scheme 1 - Allt Achadh Forsa

Scheme 2 - Allt a Choirs

Scheme 3 - Allt a Bhioda

Scheme 4 - Allt na Aoinidh Mhoir

Scheme 5 - Barr River Int 5-1

Int 5-2

PH 5a

Int 4

PH 4

PH 3

Int 3-1

Int 3-2

Int 2

PH 2

Int 1-1a

Int 1-1b

Int 1-1

Int 1-0

PH 5

PH 1

Int 3-1a

Int 5-1a

Int 5-2b

P 5bH

Morvern Community Development Hydro (MCDH)...P649 MCDH Hydro HD/TP/AJV March 2013 P649 MCDH...

Documents

Transcript of Morvern Community Development Hydro (MCDH)...P649 MCDH Hydro HD/TP/AJV March 2013 P649 MCDH...