Monitoring the Global Partnership agreement Global Partnership for Effective Development...

11
Monitoring the Global Partnership agreement Global Partnership for Effective Development Co- operation. 1

Transcript of Monitoring the Global Partnership agreement Global Partnership for Effective Development...

Page 1: Monitoring the Global Partnership agreement Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation. 1.

Monitoring the Global Partnership agreement

Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation.

1

Page 2: Monitoring the Global Partnership agreement Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation. 1.

Busan – a new world of development

• Diversity of actors.• Diversity of forms of co-operation.• Complementarity rather than competing with other resources for

development• Catalytic role of co-operation. • Unique value and nature of South-South co-operation.

Page 3: Monitoring the Global Partnership agreement Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation. 1.

Who’s in?

• 160 countries and territories • 45 international organizations• Developing countries• South-South co-operation providers• ‘Traditional’ donors • Private sector• Civil Society Organizations• Parliamentary organizations decentralized Entities, etc.

Page 4: Monitoring the Global Partnership agreement Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation. 1.

Themes Indicators

1 Development co-operation is focused on results that meet developing countries’ priorities

Extent of use of country results frameworks by co-operation providers (specific criteria to be finalised).

2 Civil society operates within an environment which maximises its engagement in and contribution to development

Enabling environment Index

3 Engagement and contribution of the private sector to development

Measure to be identified

4 Transparency: information on development co-operation is publicly available

Measure of state of implementation of the common standard by co-operation providers

5 Development co-operation is more predictable a) annual: proportion of aid disbursed within the fiscal year within which it was scheduled by co-operation providers

b) medium-term: proportion of aid covered by indicative forward spending plans provided at the country level

6 Aid is on budgets which are subject to parliamentary scrutiny % of aid scheduled for disbursement that is recorded in the annual budgets approved by the legislatures of developing countries

7 Mutual accountability among development co-operation actors is strengthened through inclusive reviews

% of countries that undertake inclusive mutual assessments of progress in implementing agreed commitments

8 Gender equality and women’s empowerment % of countries with systems that track and make public allocations for gender equality and women’s empowerment

9 Effective institutions: developing countries’ systems are strengthened and used

a) Quality of developing country PFM systems

b) Use of country PFM and procurement systems

10 Aid is untied % of aid that is fully untied

10 Global indicators5 new

indicators

Country leveldata

collection

Page 5: Monitoring the Global Partnership agreement Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation. 1.

Overall data

TOTAL ODA captured 2012/13

• Total ODA for Tanzania: USD 2,9 Bn.

• Total for GoT:USD 2,2 Bn

• Total MTEFs 2012/13:USD 2 Bn.

• Total through other providers:USD 94 mil.

Submissions from• DPG: AfDB, Belgium, Canada,

Denmark, Finland, France, EU, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, UN, UK, USG and WB.

• Other providers: GAVI and the Global Fund.

• Reached out to: Abu Dhabi Fund, ABEDA, OPEC Fund, Saudi Fund, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, OPEC Fund for International Development and the BRICS.

Page 6: Monitoring the Global Partnership agreement Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation. 1.

Indicator 5:More Predictable Development Co-operation

Increased ownership over development policies and reforms• More accurate recording of development co-operation

funding in national systems• Better planning and allocation of resources within and across

sectors• Better implementation of national development strategies

over the medium term• Greater transparency and accountability

Page 7: Monitoring the Global Partnership agreement Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation. 1.

Indicator 5a:Annual Predictability

Annual predictability2012/13: 81.7%2005-2010:

DP data submission

2005 REF-ERENCE

2007 2010 2010 TARGET

70%61%

68%

85%

Page 8: Monitoring the Global Partnership agreement Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation. 1.

Indicator 5b:More Predictable Development Co-operation

• Medium term predictability 86% for 2013/14 64% for 2014/15 50% for 2015/16

GoT data submission

Page 9: Monitoring the Global Partnership agreement Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation. 1.

Indicator 6:Aid on Budget

• Better ownership, alignment and accountability• Better knowledge of aid flows • Better alignment with priorities as outlined in the budget• More accurate and comprehensive budget reports• Greater transparency in reporting by providers• Parliaments have occasions to examine the aid modalities,

activities and achievements

Aid on budget 2012/13: 92.5%DP Average: 56%

GoT and DP data submission

Page 10: Monitoring the Global Partnership agreement Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation. 1.

Indicator 9:Use of

Country Systems

• 71.3% of ODA for GoT uses national systems. The percentage for the 4 sub-questions:– Use of national budget execution systems: 75%– Use of national financial reporting systems: 71%– Use of national audit systems: 81%– Use of national procurement procedures: 58%

DP data submission

Page 11: Monitoring the Global Partnership agreement Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation. 1.

11

Timeframe

• Early Oct: data cleaning and verification• Oct 17/10 at 11.00: Validation meeting ANSAF• Oct 31: Global deadline for submission