Monitoring Estuarine Survival of Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Smolts in the Nehalem and Alsea...

29
Monitoring Estuarine Survival of Monitoring Estuarine Survival of Steelhead ( Steelhead ( Oncorhynchus mykiss Oncorhynchus mykiss ) Smolts in ) Smolts in the Nehalem and Alsea Basins, Oregon the Nehalem and Alsea Basins, Oregon Using Acoustic Telemetry Using Acoustic Telemetry Jeremy Romer, Camille Leblanc, Carl Schreck, David Noakes, Jeremy Romer, Camille Leblanc, Carl Schreck, David Noakes, Shaun Clements Shaun Clements

Transcript of Monitoring Estuarine Survival of Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Smolts in the Nehalem and Alsea...

Page 1: Monitoring Estuarine Survival of Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Smolts in the Nehalem and Alsea Basins, Oregon Using Acoustic Telemetry Jeremy Romer,

Monitoring Estuarine Survival of Steelhead Monitoring Estuarine Survival of Steelhead ((Oncorhynchus mykissOncorhynchus mykiss) Smolts in the Nehalem and ) Smolts in the Nehalem and Alsea Basins, Oregon Using Acoustic TelemetryAlsea Basins, Oregon Using Acoustic Telemetry

Jeremy Romer, Camille Leblanc, Carl Schreck, David Noakes, Shaun Clements Jeremy Romer, Camille Leblanc, Carl Schreck, David Noakes, Shaun Clements

Page 2: Monitoring Estuarine Survival of Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Smolts in the Nehalem and Alsea Basins, Oregon Using Acoustic Telemetry Jeremy Romer,

Goal:

•Physiology- Assess degree of smoltification throughout run.

•Behavior- Assess differences between early and late run groups, between basins, or between years.

•Survival- Provide estimates of lower river and estuarine survival.

Page 3: Monitoring Estuarine Survival of Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Smolts in the Nehalem and Alsea Basins, Oregon Using Acoustic Telemetry Jeremy Romer,
Page 4: Monitoring Estuarine Survival of Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Smolts in the Nehalem and Alsea Basins, Oregon Using Acoustic Telemetry Jeremy Romer,

#

Nehalem River

North Fork

Wheeler

Manzanita

PacificOcean

Hatchery

Nehalem Bay andSurrounding Area

Oregon

#

#

# TrapLast count

Life Cycle Monitoring: Spatial Resolution

Page 5: Monitoring Estuarine Survival of Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Smolts in the Nehalem and Alsea Basins, Oregon Using Acoustic Telemetry Jeremy Romer,

#

Nehalem Bay andSurrounding Area

Oregon

# TrapLast count

Life Cycle Monitoring: Spatial Resolution

33 Km

Page 6: Monitoring Estuarine Survival of Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Smolts in the Nehalem and Alsea Basins, Oregon Using Acoustic Telemetry Jeremy Romer,

steelhead 2009

Acoustic Technology

7 mm x 18 mm, 0.7 g in water

V7V9

Page 7: Monitoring Estuarine Survival of Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Smolts in the Nehalem and Alsea Basins, Oregon Using Acoustic Telemetry Jeremy Romer,

Two (7" x 15", 16 lb) Floats

Sonic Receiver

1/2" Poly Crabline

3/8" Galvanized Chain (12')

Kedge Anchor - 40 lbs Lead Weight (4 ounce)

steelhead 2001

Page 8: Monitoring Estuarine Survival of Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Smolts in the Nehalem and Alsea Basins, Oregon Using Acoustic Telemetry Jeremy Romer,

Pacific Ocean

Page 9: Monitoring Estuarine Survival of Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Smolts in the Nehalem and Alsea Basins, Oregon Using Acoustic Telemetry Jeremy Romer,

Alsea Study Area

OHRC

Page 10: Monitoring Estuarine Survival of Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Smolts in the Nehalem and Alsea Basins, Oregon Using Acoustic Telemetry Jeremy Romer,

Nehalem Study AreaNehalem Study Area

LCM

Page 11: Monitoring Estuarine Survival of Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Smolts in the Nehalem and Alsea Basins, Oregon Using Acoustic Telemetry Jeremy Romer,
Page 12: Monitoring Estuarine Survival of Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Smolts in the Nehalem and Alsea Basins, Oregon Using Acoustic Telemetry Jeremy Romer,

07

0907

09

07 09

Waldport

0

10

20

30

Upper Mid Lower

% u

ndet

ecte

d

40

Alsea Study – Possible Mortality2007, 2009

steelhead 2007,2009

Page 13: Monitoring Estuarine Survival of Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Smolts in the Nehalem and Alsea Basins, Oregon Using Acoustic Telemetry Jeremy Romer,

95 (4)

82 (8)

100

100

= Predator Congregation = Receiver Efficiency

Page 14: Monitoring Estuarine Survival of Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Smolts in the Nehalem and Alsea Basins, Oregon Using Acoustic Telemetry Jeremy Romer,

Alsea River Mouth

Page 15: Monitoring Estuarine Survival of Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Smolts in the Nehalem and Alsea Basins, Oregon Using Acoustic Telemetry Jeremy Romer,

09

01

0209

01

02

09

01

02

steelhead 2001,2002,2009

0 2

N km

Nehalem Study – Possible Mortality2001, 2002, 2009

0

10

20

30

Upper Mid Lower

% u

ndet

ecte

d

40

Page 16: Monitoring Estuarine Survival of Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Smolts in the Nehalem and Alsea Basins, Oregon Using Acoustic Telemetry Jeremy Romer,

93 (4)

88 (6)

100

100

= Predator Congregation = Receiver Efficiency

Page 17: Monitoring Estuarine Survival of Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Smolts in the Nehalem and Alsea Basins, Oregon Using Acoustic Telemetry Jeremy Romer,

9/31 29% detected

25/39 42% detected

Alsea - Effect of run timing on survival

Page 18: Monitoring Estuarine Survival of Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Smolts in the Nehalem and Alsea Basins, Oregon Using Acoustic Telemetry Jeremy Romer,

21/34 62% detected

Nehalem - Effect of run timing on survival

Page 19: Monitoring Estuarine Survival of Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Smolts in the Nehalem and Alsea Basins, Oregon Using Acoustic Telemetry Jeremy Romer,

Early Peak

ExpGroup

0

10

20

30

40

Days

Early Peak

ExpGroup

0

10

20

30

40

Days

Alsea River (55 Km)

Effect of run timing on time to reach the lower estuary

N=9 N=25

Nehalem River (33 Km)

N=15 N=21

Page 20: Monitoring Estuarine Survival of Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Smolts in the Nehalem and Alsea Basins, Oregon Using Acoustic Telemetry Jeremy Romer,

Alsea Nehalem

River

0

2

4

6

8

Da

ys

Alsea Days Mean: 1.1 Median: 0.8 Max: 6.3 Total N: 38.0 Std Dev: 1.3

Nehalem Days 1.1 0.7 7.9 34.0 1.5

Estuary Residence Time

Page 21: Monitoring Estuarine Survival of Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Smolts in the Nehalem and Alsea Basins, Oregon Using Acoustic Telemetry Jeremy Romer,
Page 22: Monitoring Estuarine Survival of Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Smolts in the Nehalem and Alsea Basins, Oregon Using Acoustic Telemetry Jeremy Romer,
Page 23: Monitoring Estuarine Survival of Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Smolts in the Nehalem and Alsea Basins, Oregon Using Acoustic Telemetry Jeremy Romer,

Alsea River Mouth

70 tagged

62 Estuary Entry - 42 Km – 88.6%

22-38

Pacific Ocean

Ocean - 55 Km – 31-54%

Page 24: Monitoring Estuarine Survival of Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Smolts in the Nehalem and Alsea Basins, Oregon Using Acoustic Telemetry Jeremy Romer,

South JettyPacific Ocean

Nehalem River Mouth

69 tagged

53 Estuary Entry - 20 Km - 76.8%

22-34 Ocean - 33 Km – 32-49%

Page 25: Monitoring Estuarine Survival of Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Smolts in the Nehalem and Alsea Basins, Oregon Using Acoustic Telemetry Jeremy Romer,

Nehalem (n=38)

Columbia (n=64)

Dis

tan

ce T

rave

lled

(K

m)

> 41 Days0 100 200 300

Travel time to Estuary (h)

0

40

80

120

160

200

steelhead 2001

Page 26: Monitoring Estuarine Survival of Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Smolts in the Nehalem and Alsea Basins, Oregon Using Acoustic Telemetry Jeremy Romer,

Migration through the Columbia Estuary

12:00 0:00 12:00 0:00 12:00

steelhead 2001

Tid

al Stag

e (m)

Riv

er K

m

0

1

2

350

-10

0

10

20

30

40

Page 27: Monitoring Estuarine Survival of Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Smolts in the Nehalem and Alsea Basins, Oregon Using Acoustic Telemetry Jeremy Romer,

Spring Chinook

r2 = 0.52

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

75 175 275 375 475

Mean Daily Flow (kcfs)

Mea

n R

ate

(kp

h)

Steelhead

r2 = 0.47

Fall Chinook

r2 = 0.46

Migration Rates to EstuaryRelation to Flow

**

Page 28: Monitoring Estuarine Survival of Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Smolts in the Nehalem and Alsea Basins, Oregon Using Acoustic Telemetry Jeremy Romer,

ANDREW WALCH – because he is a better field tech than the one you have.

ODFWKim Jones – Gear, opportunity, motivationSteve Johnson – Alsea smolt trap setup, receiver tech support, data, adviceBrian Riggers – BoatKara Anlauf - GISCharlie Stein – Access queries, ocean fishingDave Stewart – Redwood housing NehalemKanani Bowden – ScalesLisa Borgerson – ScalesBill Ratliff – Landowner contacts Ryan Couture – OHRC, coordination Joseph O’Neil – OHRC, maker of thingsEric Suring – LCM Project LeaderChris Lorion – Smolt trapping AlseaDerek Wiley – Smolt trapping NehalemPaul Olmsted – Smolt trap NehalemAaron Paloni – Smolt trap NehalemJitesh Pattni - Smolt trap NehalemRichard Biederbeck – Technical support

OSUJayde Ferguson – ATP, ParasitesMichael Glynn – ATP assayAllison Evans – Psychotherapy & statsSchreck Lab – for the love of fish

EPA Jim Powers – VR2 receivers

LandownersPaul McCracken- NehalemPat & Bunny Wright – AlseaRichard & Kathy Ellis – Alsea

ODFW District Fish BiologistsBob Buckman – AlseaChris Knutsen – Nehalem

NOAAPete Baki –Permitting

Old Man Ocean – for letting us have all of our gear back.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Page 29: Monitoring Estuarine Survival of Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Smolts in the Nehalem and Alsea Basins, Oregon Using Acoustic Telemetry Jeremy Romer,