Monitoring and Modeling a Reservoir Flush · Flushing NWO –With Boyd PhD. NWK –With Shelley...

26
1/19/2016 Monitoring and Modeling a Reservoir Flush: Simulating Sustainable Reservoir Management at Spencer Dam with an HECRAS Unsteady Sediment Model and New Sediment Operational Rules Stanford Gibson, PhD (HEC) Paul Boyd, PhD, PE (NWO) Thursday January 7, 2015: Noon (PST) Google ngram Measures the relative occurrence of words in books over the last 200 years. 80 years 1

Transcript of Monitoring and Modeling a Reservoir Flush · Flushing NWO –With Boyd PhD. NWK –With Shelley...

Page 1: Monitoring and Modeling a Reservoir Flush · Flushing NWO –With Boyd PhD. NWK –With Shelley PhD. New SedimentFeatures in HEC‐RAS 5.0 Unsteady Sediment Transport andReservoir

                          

               

                       

 

                      

Zombies Vampires

 

1/19/2016

Monitoring and Modeling a Reservoir Flush: Simulating Sustainable Reservoir Management at Spencer Dam with an HEC‐RAS Unsteady Sediment Model and New Sediment Operational Rules

Stanford Gibson, PhD (HEC) Paul Boyd, PhD, PE (NWO)

Thursday January 7, 2015: Noon (PST)

Google n‐gram

Measures the relative occurrence of words in books over the last 200 years.

80 years

1

Page 2: Monitoring and Modeling a Reservoir Flush · Flushing NWO –With Boyd PhD. NWK –With Shelley PhD. New SedimentFeatures in HEC‐RAS 5.0 Unsteady Sediment Transport andReservoir

   

       

       

       

                      

   

                        

1/19/2016

Tuttle Reservoir, Kansas

Lewis and Clark, Missouri River

Routing

Flushing

NWO – With Paul Boyd PhD.

NWK – With John Shelley PhD.

New Sediment Features in HEC‐RAS 5.0 Unsteady Sediment Transport and Reservoir Sediment Management Features

Quasi‐Unsteady Unsteady Sediment

Funded by the Corps of Engineers Flood and Coastal Storm Damage Reduction R&D Program

2

Page 3: Monitoring and Modeling a Reservoir Flush · Flushing NWO –With Boyd PhD. NWK –With Shelley PhD. New SedimentFeatures in HEC‐RAS 5.0 Unsteady Sediment Transport andReservoir

         

                                             

                                             

                       

                

              

      

            

1/19/2016

Lewis and Clark Tuttle Creek Sediment Flushing Model Routing Model

Gibson, S. and Boyd, P. (2014) “Modeling Long Term Alternatives for Sustainable Sediment Management Using Operational Sediment Transport Rules,” Reservoir Sedimentation –Scheiss et al. (eds), 229‐236.

Shelley, J., Gibson, S., and Williams, A. (2015) “Unsteady Flow and Sediment Modeling in a Large Reservoir using HEC‐RAS 5.0,” Federal Interagency Sediment Conference, SedHyd Proceedings.

“Often the available field data are not sufficient to permit a formal calibration, but computational modeling is still the best method for analyzing the problem… The resulting studies are called computational analysis studies.”

‐Thomas and Chang ASCE Manual of Practice 110

3

Page 4: Monitoring and Modeling a Reservoir Flush · Flushing NWO –With Boyd PhD. NWK –With Shelley PhD. New SedimentFeatures in HEC‐RAS 5.0 Unsteady Sediment Transport andReservoir

           

 

  

      

1/19/2016

Funded by the Regional Sediment Management R&D Program (RSM)

Spencer Dam Flushing Model

Spencer Dam on the Niobrara River

4

Page 5: Monitoring and Modeling a Reservoir Flush · Flushing NWO –With Boyd PhD. NWK –With Shelley PhD. New SedimentFeatures in HEC‐RAS 5.0 Unsteady Sediment Transport andReservoir

1/19/2016

5

Page 6: Monitoring and Modeling a Reservoir Flush · Flushing NWO –With Boyd PhD. NWK –With Shelley PhD. New SedimentFeatures in HEC‐RAS 5.0 Unsteady Sediment Transport andReservoir

1/19/2016

6

Page 7: Monitoring and Modeling a Reservoir Flush · Flushing NWO –With Boyd PhD. NWK –With Shelley PhD. New SedimentFeatures in HEC‐RAS 5.0 Unsteady Sediment Transport andReservoir

  

1/19/2016

The November 2015 Flush

t~5hrs

vid

7

Page 8: Monitoring and Modeling a Reservoir Flush · Flushing NWO –With Boyd PhD. NWK –With Shelley PhD. New SedimentFeatures in HEC‐RAS 5.0 Unsteady Sediment Transport andReservoir

1/19/2016

8

Page 9: Monitoring and Modeling a Reservoir Flush · Flushing NWO –With Boyd PhD. NWK –With Shelley PhD. New SedimentFeatures in HEC‐RAS 5.0 Unsteady Sediment Transport andReservoir

1/19/2016

9

Page 10: Monitoring and Modeling a Reservoir Flush · Flushing NWO –With Boyd PhD. NWK –With Shelley PhD. New SedimentFeatures in HEC‐RAS 5.0 Unsteady Sediment Transport andReservoir

 

           

 

     

1/19/2016

Reservoir Stratigraphy

Coarse Sand and Gravel Cross Bedding Clay Seams

Mud Flats

Organic Flood Debris Layers

Missouri

Niobrara

10

Page 11: Monitoring and Modeling a Reservoir Flush · Flushing NWO –With Boyd PhD. NWK –With Shelley PhD. New SedimentFeatures in HEC‐RAS 5.0 Unsteady Sediment Transport andReservoir

      

 

   

     

    

1/19/2016

Qualitative Observations: Novel Bed Forms

Clay Rollers

“Topographic” Bed Forms

Periodic Antidunes ‐ 90 s cycle

HEC‐RAS Model and Calibration

11

Page 12: Monitoring and Modeling a Reservoir Flush · Flushing NWO –With Boyd PhD. NWK –With Shelley PhD. New SedimentFeatures in HEC‐RAS 5.0 Unsteady Sediment Transport andReservoir

   

   

1/19/2016

Survey and HEC‐geoRAS Model

Spencer HEC‐RAS Model

400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

1485

1490

1495

1500

1505

1510

Station (ft)

Ele

vatio

n (

ft)

3 2

12

Page 13: Monitoring and Modeling a Reservoir Flush · Flushing NWO –With Boyd PhD. NWK –With Shelley PhD. New SedimentFeatures in HEC‐RAS 5.0 Unsteady Sediment Transport andReservoir

   

1/19/2016

Pre‐Flush Sediment Samples

13

Page 14: Monitoring and Modeling a Reservoir Flush · Flushing NWO –With Boyd PhD. NWK –With Shelley PhD. New SedimentFeatures in HEC‐RAS 5.0 Unsteady Sediment Transport andReservoir

   

 

 

Sampling Bridge

1/19/2016

Post‐Flush Core Samples

USGS Concentration Measurements

Dam

14

Page 15: Monitoring and Modeling a Reservoir Flush · Flushing NWO –With Boyd PhD. NWK –With Shelley PhD. New SedimentFeatures in HEC‐RAS 5.0 Unsteady Sediment Transport andReservoir

   

         

1/19/2016

Downstream Concentration Calibration

Cumulative Volume Change (4 week run)

15

Page 16: Monitoring and Modeling a Reservoir Flush · Flushing NWO –With Boyd PhD. NWK –With Shelley PhD. New SedimentFeatures in HEC‐RAS 5.0 Unsteady Sediment Transport andReservoir

   

   

1/19/2016

Spencer HEC‐RAS Model

Lateral Processes Observed

16

Page 17: Monitoring and Modeling a Reservoir Flush · Flushing NWO –With Boyd PhD. NWK –With Shelley PhD. New SedimentFeatures in HEC‐RAS 5.0 Unsteady Sediment Transport andReservoir

                

   

1/19/2016

http://www.eng.buffalo.edu/glp/events/summer2008/week1/full/8‐GoodwinCreekDesign.pdf

USDA‐ARS Bank Failure and Toe Scour Model (BSTEM) in HEC‐RAS

Goodwin Creek Validation

17

Page 18: Monitoring and Modeling a Reservoir Flush · Flushing NWO –With Boyd PhD. NWK –With Shelley PhD. New SedimentFeatures in HEC‐RAS 5.0 Unsteady Sediment Transport andReservoir

                  

      

1/19/2016

Deposition Model: Measured and Computed Bed Change Between Fall and Spring Flushes

HEC‐RAS Modeling Alternatives: Concentration Controlled Flushing

18

Page 19: Monitoring and Modeling a Reservoir Flush · Flushing NWO –With Boyd PhD. NWK –With Shelley PhD. New SedimentFeatures in HEC‐RAS 5.0 Unsteady Sediment Transport andReservoir

   

1/19/2016

Downstream Concentration Threshold

19

Page 20: Monitoring and Modeling a Reservoir Flush · Flushing NWO –With Boyd PhD. NWK –With Shelley PhD. New SedimentFeatures in HEC‐RAS 5.0 Unsteady Sediment Transport andReservoir

     

    

1/19/2016

HEC‐RAS Concentration Threshold Model

HEC‐RAS Modeling Alternatives: Routing Qsed‐in=Qsed‐out

20

Page 21: Monitoring and Modeling a Reservoir Flush · Flushing NWO –With Boyd PhD. NWK –With Shelley PhD. New SedimentFeatures in HEC‐RAS 5.0 Unsteady Sediment Transport andReservoir

      

1/19/2016

International Sustainable Reservoir Management Initiatives

21

Page 22: Monitoring and Modeling a Reservoir Flush · Flushing NWO –With Boyd PhD. NWK –With Shelley PhD. New SedimentFeatures in HEC‐RAS 5.0 Unsteady Sediment Transport andReservoir

   

                                                    

     

       

1/19/2016

Lower Mekong Basin

Kondolf, G.M., Rubin, Z.K, and Minear, J.T., (2014) “Dams on the Mekong: Cumulative sediment starvationWater Resources Research” Volume 50, Issue 6, pages 5158‐5169, 27 JUN 2014 DOI: 10.1002/2013WR014651

Laos Reservoir Sediment Workshops

Pictures From Paul Boyd (NWO)

22

Page 23: Monitoring and Modeling a Reservoir Flush · Flushing NWO –With Boyd PhD. NWK –With Shelley PhD. New SedimentFeatures in HEC‐RAS 5.0 Unsteady Sediment Transport andReservoir

     

   

1/19/2016

Laos Reservoir Sediment Workshops

Nam Ou 2 Model

23

Page 24: Monitoring and Modeling a Reservoir Flush · Flushing NWO –With Boyd PhD. NWK –With Shelley PhD. New SedimentFeatures in HEC‐RAS 5.0 Unsteady Sediment Transport andReservoir

   

   

1/19/2016

Nam Ou 2 Model

Nam Ou 2 Model

24

Page 25: Monitoring and Modeling a Reservoir Flush · Flushing NWO –With Boyd PhD. NWK –With Shelley PhD. New SedimentFeatures in HEC‐RAS 5.0 Unsteady Sediment Transport andReservoir

                    

           ‐      ‐

               ‐   ‐                

       

          

         

                      

          

              

                  

           

1/19/2016

Ongoing HEC‐RAS Sediment Activities Select Projects: ‐Islamabad Class and Tarbela Model

‐with Bill Doan and Mamie Brouwer ‐ USACE/USAID ‐Lower Missouri Sediment Model (500 miles)

with John Shelley NWK ‐Lower Mississippi Unsteady Sediment Model (DS of Old River)

with ERDC CHL: Ronnie Heath, Travis Dahl, Jim Lewis, Chris Nygaard

‐Muskegon River Coupled Ice‐Sediment Model ‐For Detroit District ‐ LRE

‐Falls Creek Sediment Flushing Model ‐with Chris Nygaard – NWP – For RSM

Features: 2D Sediment – With Alex Sanchez 1D Unsteady Finite Volume Method – RMA and RAS Team

Partners Funding Partners: Regional Sediment Management R&D Program (RSM) Flood and Coastal Storm Damage Reduction R&D Program Omaha District USGS

HEC‐RAS Team: Gary Brunner, Mark Jensen, Steve Piper, Cam Ackerman, Alex Kennedy

District Partners: Paul Boyd, PhD, PE – NWO John Shelley, PhD – NWK

25

Page 26: Monitoring and Modeling a Reservoir Flush · Flushing NWO –With Boyd PhD. NWK –With Shelley PhD. New SedimentFeatures in HEC‐RAS 5.0 Unsteady Sediment Transport andReservoir

 

1/19/2016

Niobrara River

26