Money and Banking - SJTU...2017/11/27 · rate; reduce USD’s weight in the basket of reference...
Transcript of Money and Banking - SJTU...2017/11/27 · rate; reduce USD’s weight in the basket of reference...
Money and Banking
Lecture XI: Exchange Rate Regime Choice and Exchange Rate Forecast
Guoxiong ZHANG, Ph.D.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Antai
November 28th, 2017
Source: http://www.dailymirror.lk
Road Map
Exchange rate regime choicehistorical experienceChina’s perspective
Exchange rate forecastexchange rate forecast modelsexchange rate forecast performance
Gold Standard
Before World War I, the world economy operated under the goldstandard: currency of most countries was convertible directly into goldat fixed rates.
Disadvantage of this gold standard: can not have active monetarypolicy.
The world economy grows faster than the speed of gold production,caused deflation;Huge amount of gold discovered in South America caused inflation.
Bretton Woods System
After World War II, US became the world leader and USD became theonly reserve currency, and therefore Bretton Woods System wascreated in 1944:
All the other countries’ currency has a fixed exchange rate with USD;One USD has a fixed value of 1
35ounce of gold.
In 1971, US unilaterally devaluated dollar to one dollar equals 142
ounce of gold;
In 1973, US terminated convertibility of the US dollar to gold and letother countries to choose their own exchange rate with dollar.
Classification of Exchange Rate Regime
Textbook classification:fixed (Hong Kong, etc.)managed float (China, etc.)float (most other countries)
IMF classification:floatingsoft peg (managed float)hard peg (currency board)others?dollarization?
Map of Exchange Rate Regimes
Optimal Exchange Rate Regime
How to choose exchange rate regime that suits the country the besthas been an evolving theme:
before 1990s, most countries, especially developing and transitioneconomies prefer fixed exchange rate regime;in 1990s, several countries with fixed exchange rate regime suffer fromserious capital crisis and therefore shifted to more float exchange rateregimes;around 2000, bipolar exchange rate regime (either free float or hard peg)became popular until Argentina’s currency crisis in 2002;after every financial crisis (2001 IT bubble, 2007-2009 financial crisis),more countries tend to abandon float exchange rate regime (fear to float)
Benefits from a Fixed Exchange Rate Regime
A series of studies by IMF (1999 - 2009) do find empirical evidencethat a fixed exchange rate regime may benefits developing countries:
Pegged exchange rate regimes are associated with the best in ationperformanceGrowth performance is best under intermediate exchange rateregimes?those that maintain relatively rigid exchange rates but do notformally peg to a single anchor currency.Countries in a monetary union have deeper trade links.
Downsides of a Fixed Exchange Rate Regime
These studies also find downsides of a fixed or intermediate exchangerate regime may hurt a developing economy:
a fixed or intermediate exchange rate regime severely constrains the useof other macroeconomic policies (both monetary policy and fiscalpolicy);a fixed or intermediate exchange rate regime has greater susceptibility tocurrency and financial crises, such as debt crises, a sudden stop incapital inflows, or banking crisesa fixed or intermediate exchange rate regime impedes timely externaladjustment
Exchange Rate of RMB
Exchange Rate Regime of RMB
Before 1994, RMB is officially pegged to dollar (between 1985 and1993, dual exchange rates);
In 1994, RMB started managed-float with USD as the only referencecurrency: market exchange rate can fluctuate within a narrow bandaround the official benchmark rate;
Started in 2005, RMB use a basket of currencies as reference;
Band width: 0.3% in 2005, 0.5% in 2007, 1% in 2012 and 2% in 2014.
In August 2015, two major reforms were initiated:use last trading-day’s close rate as reference for the official benchmarkrate;reduce USD’s weight in the basket of reference currency.
Future Perspective of the Exchange Rate Regime of RMB
The direction of renminbi exchange rate reform is irreversible.China will continue to enhance exchange rate flexibility, and in thenear future, China is going to increase the floating band of therenminbi even further, letting market supply and demand play thefundamental role in exchange rate formation. China will alsoreduce central bank intervention, enhance the self-rebalancingcapability of foreign exchange market, and improve the self-pricingand risk management capabilities of the financial institutions.
-Yi, Gang (2013)
Exchange Rate Forecast Models
It is well known that exchange rates are very difficult to predict usingeconomic models
Meese and Rogoff puzzle: a simple random walk model without anyeconomic meaning can generate better exchange rate forecasts thaneconomic models.
Nevertheless it is important to understand the forecast models used byeconomists.
Older models (before 1990s): uncovered interest rate parity model,purchasing power parity model.Newer models (after 1990s): sticky price model, productivity differentialmodel, composite model
Random Walk Model
St = St−1 + εt,
where E(εt) = 0, var(εt) <∞ and corr(εi, εj) = 0 for ∀i 6= j.
USD-Euro Exchange Rate, Level
Source: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DEXUSEU
USD-Euro Exchange Rate, Change
Source: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DEXUSEU
USD-Euro Exchange Rate, Autocorrelation
Source: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DEXUSEU
Purchasing Power Parity Model
st = α+ pt + ut,
where st = log(St), pt is the log of CPI,pt = pt,i − pt,j , and ut is an errorterm.
Uncovered Interest Rate Parity Model
st+k = st + it,k + ut,
where it,k is the interest rate of maturity k at time t.
Sticky Price Model
st = α+ β1mt + β2yt + β3 it + β4πt + ut,
where mt is log money supply, yt is log real GDP, it is nominal interestrate, πt is inflation rate, and again · denotes country differential.
Productivity Differential Model
st = α+ β1mt + β2yt + β3 it + β4zt + ut,
where zt is country productivity (TFP).
Composition Model
st = α+ pt + β1ωt + β2rt + β3 ˆg dt + β4 ˆTOT t + β4 ˆNFAt + ut,
where ωt is the price of non-tradables, rt is the real interest rate, g dt is theGDP over government debt ratio, TOT t is terms-of-trade (real exchangerate), and NFAt is net foreign asset holding.
Forecast Performance
We assess the forecast performance of these models by comparing itsforecast MSE with the one of the random walk model:
MSE =T∑
t=1
(st − st)2.
Forecast Performance
Table 1
The MSE ratios from the dollar-based exchange rates
Specification Horizon Sample 1: 1987q2e2000q4 Sample 2: 1983q1e2000q4
PPP S-P IRP PROD COMP PPP S-P IRP PROD COMP
Panel A: BP/$
ECM 1 4.165 1.047 1.008 0.995 1.085 5.678 1.050 1.046 1.042 1.049
0.003 0.409 0.883 0.897 0.208 0.031 0.310 0.318 0.303 0.448
4 1.750 1.127 1.092 1.017 1.099 1.612 1.142 1.123 1.085 1.127
0.199 0.503 0.620 0.802 0.253 0.224 0.171 0.310 0.237 0.225
20 0.782 1.809 1.342 1.095 1.340 0.632 1.457 0.841 1.545 2.179
0.536 0.014 0.240 0.411 0.168 0.156 0.071 0.518 0.092 0.057
FD 1 1.041 1.006 1.191 1.086 1.079 1.023
0.434 0.940 0.217 0.135 0.337 0.901
4 1.120 1.124 1.881 1.250 1.455 1.448
0.315 0.524 0.001 0.149 0.176 0.351
20 1.891 2.531 6.953 3.223 5.557 6.015
0.177 0.021 0.000 0.195 0.019 0.001
Panel B: CAN$/$
ECM 1 32.205 1.054 1.090 1.148 1.278 31.982 1.056 1.092 1.041 1.337
0.008 0.127 0.048 0.062 0.016 0.001 0.279 0.022 0.552 0.004
4 6.504 1.102 1.172 1.182 1.603 6.947 1.116 1.170 1.017 1.754
0.016 0.181 0.452 0.157 0.118 0.004 0.334 0.359 0.929 0.018
20 1.569 0.939 0.865 1.090 1.760 1.171 1.062 0.813 1.097 1.623
0.000 0.574 0.760 0.308 0.002 0.093 0.727 0.607 0.318 0.000
FD 1 1.100 1.115 0.614 1.101 1.171 0.666
0.179 0.138 0.109 0.257 0.047 0.151
4 1.137 1.160 0.899 1.196 1.269 1.143
0.461 0.341 0.798 0.347 0.192 0.704
20 0.515 0.504 1.924 1.892 2.004 2.289
0.193 0.182 0.006 0.182 0.143 0.204
Panel C: DM/$
ECM 1 6.357 1.059 1.030 1.041 0.995 11.173 1.105 1.029 0.997 0.911
0.006 0.464 0.295 0.574 0.955 0.005 0.416 0.364 0.961 0.206
4 2.301 1.080 1.136 1.080 1.116 2.675 1.104 1.063 0.949 0.898
0.016 0.444 0.069 0.282 0.642 0.007 0.599 0.485 0.626 0.558
20 0.649 1.047 0.596 1.131 2.137 0.411 1.771 0.895 1.260 0.633
0.363 0.637 0.167 0.141 0.216 0.248 0.212 0.656 0.039 0.202
FD 1 1.268 1.324 0.555 1.123 1.196 0.694
0.052 0.106 0.001 0.017 0.084 0.020
4 1.402 1.607 0.844 1.077 1.281 1.151
0.024 0.030 0.571 0.452 0.009 0.612
20 1.814 1.927 2.522 1.723 1.964 3.975
0.175 0.114 0.140 0.246 0.121 0.003
Panel D: SF/$
ECM 1 7.595 1.074 1.051 1.024 . 8.694 0.995 1.050 1.052 .
0.001 0.187 0.138 0.515 . 0.000 0.906 0.141 0.581 .
4 2.537 1.269 1.183 1.184 . 2.106 1.002 1.122 1.136 .
0.014 0.015 0.059 0.367 . 0.003 0.982 0.248 0.149 .
(continued on next page)
1159Y.-W. Cheung et al. / Journal of International Money and Finance 24 (2005) 1150e1175