1813
Introduction The crustacean molting cycle serves as a model for studying
mechanisms of calcium (Ca2+) homeostasis (Wheatly, 1999; Wheatly et al., 2002) because directionality and magnitude of transepithelial Ca2+ flux are dramatically regulated. Crustaceans exhibit Ca2+ balance in intermolt, transition to net loss in premolt associated with cuticular demineralization and, following ecdysis, switch to impressive postmolt uptake to calcify the new exoskeleton. Crustaceans residing in different environments have developed appropriate strategies for Ca2+
conservation and acquisition. The freshwater (FW) crayfish, Procambarus clarkii, exhibits unique adaptations for evolution into Ca-deficient (<1·mmol·l–1) inland waters, including the ability to dilute the urine (Wheatly and Toop, 1989) and impressive postmolt branchial net Ca2+ uptake. Because the crayfish maintains circulating hemolymph Ca2+ levels above ambient, unidirectional Ca2+ influx is necessarily active.
There is an accepted model for transcellular Ca2+ influx in animal models. First, because intracellular (IC) Ca2+
concentration is maintained at micromolar levels and the interior of a cell is negatively charged, apical Ca2+ entry is passive, involving simple diffusion through Ca2+ channels or via carrier-mediated/facilitated diffusion. Meanwhile,
basolateral Ca2+ export is active and effected by the Na+/Ca2+
exchanger (NCX) and/or a plasma membrane Ca2+ ATPase (PMCA). This model has been confirmed in crustacean epithelia (reviewed by Wheatly et al., 2002). Active basolateral processes have received greater attention (Flik et al., 1994; Zhuang and Ahearn, 1996; Wheatly et al., 1999) than apical mechanisms (Ahearn and Franco, 1990; Ahearn and Franco, 1993; Zhuang and Ahearn, 1996).
Crustacean apical Ca2+ channels have received relatively little experimental attention, even though, from an energetic perspective, apical Ca2+ entry is the rate-limiting step (‘gatekeeper’) in epithelial Ca2+ uptake and, as such, the best target for regulation. Ca2+ channels have been classified as voltage-operated, ligand-gated, mechanosensitive, or Ca2+
store-operated based largely on electrophysiological and pharmacological properties. Physiological studies in crustaceans have variously suggested that apical Ca2+ channels are inhibitable by Ba2+/La3+ and verapamil, and are membrane potential-dependent (Ahearn and Franco, 1993; Ahearn and Zhuang, 1996; Zhuang and Ahearn, 1996; Zilli et al., 2000). Comparable studies in FW fish have concluded that a mixed population of voltage-dependent (Comhaire et al., 1998) and voltage-independent Ca2+ channels [trout (Perry and Flik,
This study describes the cloning, sequencing and functional characterization of an epithelial Ca2+ channel (ECaC)-like gene isolated from antennal gland (kidney) of the freshwater crayfish Procambarus clarkii. The full- length cDNA consisted of 2687·bp with an open reading frame of 2169·bp encoding a protein of 722 amino acids with a predicted molecular mass of 81.7·kDa. Crayfish ECaC had 76–78% identity at the mRNA level (80–82% amino acid identity) with published fish sequences and 56–62% identity at the mRNA level (52–60% amino acid identity) with mammalian ECaCs. Secondary structure of the crayfish ECaC closely resembled that of cloned ECaCs. Postmolt ECaC expression was exclusively restricted to epithelia associated with Ca2+ influx and was virtually undetectable in non-epithelial tissues (eggs, muscle). Compared with expression levels in
hepatopancreas, expression in gill was 10-fold greater and expression was highest in antennal gland (15-fold greater than in hepatopancreas). Compared with baseline expression levels in intermolt stage, expression of ECaC in antennal gland increased 7.4- and 23.8-fold, respectively, in pre- and postmolt stages of the molting cycle. This increase was localized primarily in the labyrinth and nephridial canal, regions of the antennal gland associated with renal Ca2+ reabsorption. The ECaC in crayfish appears to be expressed in epithelia associated with unidirectional Ca2+ influx and relative expression is correlated with rate of Ca2+ influx.
Key words: crayfish, Procambarus clarkii, antennal gland, gill, hepatopancreas, epithelial Ca2+ channel, ECaC, mRNA expression and localization, molting cycle.
Summary
The Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 1813-1824 Published by The Company of Biologists 2007 doi:10.1242/jeb.02761
Molecular characterization of an epithelial Ca2+ channel-like gene from crayfish Procambarus clarkii
Yongping Gao and Michele G. Wheatly* Department of Biological Sciences, Wright State University, Dayton, OH 45435, USA
*Author for correspondence (e-mail: michele.wheatly@wright.edu)
Accepted 22 February 2007
1814
1988) and tilapia (Flik et al., 1993)] exist in gill and intestine. Meanwhile, the apical Ca2+ channels responsible for Ca2+
influx in epithelial tissues remained elusive for many years. Although several distinct voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels are present in the apical membrane of epithelial cells (Yu et al., 1992), apical administration of known Ca2+ channel antagonists failed to block Ca2+ reabsorption.
A novel non-voltage-gated epithelial Ca2+ channel (ECaC) was finally cloned from rabbit kidney (Hoenderop et al., 1999a) that was exclusively expressed in Ca2+ absorptive epithelia responsive to calciotropic hormones, namely distal parts of the nephron (connecting tubules, cortical collecting duct), small intestine and placenta. Subsequently, the human kidney (ECaC1) (Müller et al., 2000a; Müller et al., 2001) and intestine orthologues (calcium transport protein, CaT1/ECaC2) (Peng et al., 2000a; Hoenderop et al., 2000a) were identified. Subsequent studies confirmed that ECaC1 and ECaC2 are localized adjacent to each other on the same chromosome, suggesting that they are duplications of a common ancestral gene (Müller et al., 2000b). ECaCs are calcium-selective members of the vanilloid subfamily of the transient receptor potential superfamily (TRPV) of channels. Recently, standard nomenclature for this family has been recommended (TRPV5 for ECaC1/CaT2 and TRVP6 for ECaC2/CaT1) (Montell et al., 2002). Other members encode nonselective cation channels that function as heat sensors [capsaicin receptor, VR1 (TRPV1), VRL-1 (TRPV2) and TRPV3] or osmoreceptors [OTRPC4/VR-OAC/VRL-2/TRP12 (TRPV4) (Peng et al., 2001; Peng et al., 2003a; Peng et al., 2003b)].
ECaCs have recently been cloned from rainbow trout (Perry et al., 2003; Shahsavarani et al., 2006), pufferfish (Qiu and Hogstrand, 2004) and zebrafish (Pan et al., 2005). Seemingly there is a single ECaC gene in fish, suggesting that gene duplication occurred after the divergence of fish and mammals (Pan et al., 2005). In two of the fish studies (Qiu and Hogstrand, 2004; Pan et al., 2005), ECaC upregulation was associated with increased Ca2+ uptake rate.
The aim of the present study was to characterize crustacean ECaC. We selected antennal gland (kidney) because of significant intermolt Ca2+ reabsorption, suggesting high ECaC abundance. Owing to loading of external FW prior to ecdysis (shedding) and the subsequent hemodilution, postfiltrational Ca2+ reabsorption (and concomitantly ECaC expression) is predicted to increase in pre- and postmolt stages compared with intermolt.
Materials and methods Experimental animals
Crayfish Procambarus clarkii (Girard) were obtained and maintained, and molting stages were assessed as outlined in prior laboratory publications (Gao and Wheatly, 2004). ECaC was cloned from postmolt antennal gland (kidney) using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), followed by rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE)
strategy. Relative ECaC expression was documented in a range of postmolt tissues (using real-time PCR and quantitative RT- PCR), including cardiac (heart) muscle, axial abdominal (tail) muscle, antennal gland, gill, hepatopancreas (liver) and egg. These techniques were also used to quantify relative expression of ECaC in antennal gland during different molting stages. ECaC expression was subsequently localized in transverse sections of antennal gland using in situ hybridization.
Isolation of total RNA and mRNA
After dissection, tissues were frozen immediately in liquid N2 and stored at –80°C. Total RNA was isolated using the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen). Briefly, 0.2·g of tissue was finely ground in liquid N2 and lysed by adding 1.0·ml of Trizol reagent. The lysates were allowed to incubate at room temperature (RT) for 5·min. Then, 1.0·ml chloroform was added, followed by vigorous vortexing for 15·s. Samples were then incubated for 5·min at RT and centrifuged for 15·min at 13·400·g. Following removal of the aqueous phase and addition of 1.5·ml of isopropanol, samples were placed at –80°C overnight and then centrifuged for 15·min at 13·400·g. The RNA pellets were washed with 1.5·ml 75% ethanol, sedimented for 5·min at 7500·g and air-dried for 10·min before being dissolved in diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC)-treated water and stored at –80°C. RNA was quantified by RNA 6000 Nano assay in the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). mRNA was separated from total RNA using an oligo-dT cellulose column (Stratagene).
Cloning of crayfish ECaC by RT-PCR and RACE
First-strand cDNA was reverse transcribed from 400·ng of mRNA from postmolt antennal gland using the SuperScript II RNase H-reverse transcriptase (Gibco-BRL, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) with oligo(dT) 12–18 as primer. Based on four published ECaC sequences from human ECAC1 (GenBank accession number AJ271207; now known as TRPV5), rabbit ECaC (AJ133129), rainbow trout ECaC (AY256348) and pufferfish ECaC (AY232821), two degenerate primers, 5- GGVCCCTTCCATGTYATYCTTATY-3 (sense) and 5- AGGWACCARCGCTCCCCCAGRCC-3 (antisense), were designed, corresponding to nucleotides 1401-2024 in rainbow trout and 1398-2031 in pufferfish. These primers targeted a fragment of approximately 626·bp located between transmembrane domain 3 and a positive protein kinase C phosphorylation site after transmembrane domain 6. PCR (total volume 50·l) included 2·l of first-strand cDNA from postmolt antennal gland, 20·mmol·l–1 Tris HCl (pH·8.4), 50·mmol·l–1 KCl, 1.5·mmol·l–1 MgCl2, 0.2·mmol·l–1 dNTP mix, 0.1-0.2·mol·l–1 of each primer and 2.5 units of Taq DNA polymerase (Gibco-BRL). RT-PCR cycles were performed at 94°C for 3·min, followed by 30 cycles of 94°C for 30·s, 55°C for 1·min, 72°C for 1·min, and a final cycle of 72°C for 10·min. Negative controls in which reactions contained no template cDNA were included. RT-PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis on a 1.0% agarose gel with 0.5·g·ml–1 of ethidium bromide in 1 TAE buffer [40·mmol·l–1 Tris,
Y. Gao and M. G. Wheatly
THE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
1815Cloning and characterization of crayfish EcaC
40·mmol·l–1 sodium acetate and 1·mmol·l–1 ethylenediamine- tetraacetic acid (EDTA), pH·7.2]. The DNA bands were visualized with ultraviolet light.
Subsequently, 3 and 5 RACE systems for rapid amplification of cDNA ends (Invitrogen) were used to amplify the 3 and 5 ends. For the 3 RACE, a gene-specific primer, 5-GCTGCCTCGCTGCCTGTG-3, and a nested primer, 5- GTGTGGCCTGGAGTACGGTCTGG-3, were used. For the 5 RACE, two gene-specific primers, 5-CACCTCG CTGA - CCCTGAACACG-3 and 5-ACGCACAGCAGCACCAC - CAG-3, and a nested primer, 5-CAGGGAGGCATAGGT - GATAAGGAT-3, were designed. The PCR conditions were the same as described above. PCR products were ligated to PCR 2.1 vector (Invitrogen) and transformed into INVF host cell (Invitrogen). Each clone was digested with appropriate restriction enzymes and subcloned for sequencing. Two independent clones were sequenced from both ends.
DNA sequencing and analysis
The cDNA clones were sequenced by automated sequencing (ABI PRISM 377, 3100 and 3700 DNA sequencers; Davis Sequencing, Davis, CA, USA). The complete sequence was assembled with DNASTAR (DNASTAR, Madison, WI, USA). Sequence homology was analyzed through the GenBank database using the BLAST algorithm (Altschul et al., 1990). Analysis of the phylogenetic relationships among all the ECaC sequences as well as with other channel proteins was undertaken by the Jotun Hein method of MEMALIGN (DNASTAR), which evaluates and scores all ancestors by pair alignment as well as concensi between progeny.
Real-time PCR and quantitative RT-PCR assays
Real-time PCR was used to quantitate relative expression of ECaC mRNA in a range of epithelial and non-epithelial tissues, as well as to document relative expression in antennal gland during different molt stages (compared with intermolt). For each sample the amount of mRNA was quantified relative to 5·g of total RNA by real-time RT-PCR. The TURBO DNA-free kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) was used to eliminate genomic DNA contamination prior to RT-PCR. DNA-free total RNA from each tissue (1·g) was reverse transcribed with random hexamers to create cDNA using the TaqMan Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems). The resulting cDNA was employed in PCR amplifications optimized with gene-specific primers containing a fluorescent reporter molecule (SYBR Green PCR core reagents kit; Applied Biosystems).
Oligonucleotide primers for the crayfish ECaC gene [5- GTAGCTACGCCCAGGGTCACAGG-3 (sense) and 5- TCGATGAGCAGGGAGATGATGTC-3 (antisense)] (see Fig.·1 for primer location) were chosen with the Primer ExpressTM software (Applied Biosystems). The integrity of the cDNA from the tissues was checked by the presence of a fragment of 18s rRNA gene. The 18s rRNA primers (sense 5-TGGTGCATGGCCGTTCTTA-3 and antisense 5- AATTGCTGGAGATCCGTCGAC-3) were designed from
TGTGCACCTATTCTCAAGTGTGCTCGACATTTTCTGTTCCCCCAGTACCTCATTGGTCTGG 61 AAG ATGTCCCCGTCTCTGGCCAGGTCGGCTCCAAGTGAGCTCAACCACAGGTGGAGTCAGTTTAGG 187
ACTATCAGGGATAGTGGAATACTACTTTTGCCTTTTAAGGTGGAATCCCCAGGTGTCCGG 124
M S P S L A R S A P S E L N H R W S Q F R 21 TTTCGCCTCCATAACAGGAAAGGATGGAAAGAGATGTTGGATGAAACTTTTCTGCTCGATAAC 250 F R L H N R K G W K E M L D E T F L L D N 42 AAGAAGATAAACAACATTCCTCTCTTCTATGCGGCCCCAGAGAATAATGCAGGTTGCATCAAG 313 K K I N N I P L F Y A A P E N N A G C I K 63 AAACTTCTAGGCTGCTCCTCCACTAACATATTTGAAAGAGGGGCTCTGGGGGAGACGGCGCTA 376 K L L G C S S T N I F E R G A L G E T A L 84 CACGTCGCAGTTATGAATGACAACGTGGAAGCCGCTCTGGTTCTGATGGAGGGGGCACCTGAA 439 H V A V M N D N V E A A L V L M E G A P E 105 CTCATCAATGAGCCCATGACCTCTGAGCTTTTCCTAGGTGTGACTCCTCTCCATATTGCCGTG 502 L I N E P M T S E L F L G V T P L H I A V 126 Real-time sense primer GTGAATCAGAACGTTAACTTGGTCCACGACCTGATTAGCCGTGGGGCCGATGTAGCTACGCCC 565 V N Q N V N L V H D L I S R G A D V A T P 147 AGGGTCACAGGGCTGTATTTCAGGAAGAGAATCGGAGCGCTGCTTTACTACGGTGACCACATC 628 R V T G L Y F R K R I G A L L Y Y G D H I 168 CTGGCATTTGCTGCCTGTGTGGGGAATCAGGACATCATCTCCCTGCTCATCGAGGGAGGAGCC 691 L A F A A C V G N Q D I I S L L I E G G A 189
Real-time PCR antisense primer AGCACCAGGGCCCAGGATTCCCTTGGTAACACAGTGCTCCATATTCTGGTCCTGCAGGCCAAC 754 S T R A Q D S L G N T V L H I L V L Q A N 210 AAGACTATAGCATGCCAGGTGTTGGACCTGCTGCTGGCACGTGATGGAGAGCTGGACCAGCCG 817 K T I A C Q V L D L L L A R D G E L D Q P 231
RT-PCR sense primer GTGCCCCTGGACATGGTGCCCAACCACCAGGGTCTCACCCCCTTCAAACTGGCTGCCAAGGAG 880 V P L D M V P N H Q G L T P F K L A A K E 252 GGTAACCCTGTGGCGTTCCAGCACCTGGTGAATAAGAGGCGGCTCATCCAGTGGACGCTGGGA 943
G N P V A F Q H L V N K R R L I Q W T L G 273 CCCCTGACCTCCAACCTCTATGACCTCACAGAGATCGACTCCTGGGCTGACGACATGTCTGGC 1006 P L T S N L Y D L T E I D S W A D D M S G 294 CTGGAGCTCGTCGTGGGCAGTAAGAAGAGAGAGGCTAGGCGGATTCTGGAACTGACTCCTGTG 1069 L E L V V G S K K R E A R R I L E L T P V 315 AAGCAGCTGGTCAGTTTCAAGTGGAACCTGTATGGCCGGCAGTACTTCAGGATGCTGGGGTTG 1132 K Q L V S F K W N L Y G R Q Y F R M L G L 336 CTGTACCTCCTGTACATTGGCACCTTCACACTGTGTTGTGTATATCGCCCCCTTAAGGACACT 1195 L Y L L Y I G T F T L C C V Y R P L K D T 357 Transmembrane domain 1 CCTGAGAACTACACTGAATCTGAGCTGGACAACACCATCCGCGTGCAGAAAACGCTGCAGGAG 1528 P E N Y T E S E L D N T I R V Q K T L Q E 378 AGTTATGTGACACGTGACGACAACTTGCGGCTGGTGGGAGAGCTGATCAGCGTCCTGGGGGCT 1321 S Y V T R D D N L R L V G E L I S V L G A 399 GTGGTCATCCTGCTCCTGGAGATCCCAGATATCCTAAGAGTTGGGGCCAAGCGTTATTTTGGA 1384 V V I L L L E I P D I L R V G A K R Y F G 420
Transmembrane domain 2 In situ hybridization probe CAGACGGCCCTGGGGGGGCCCTTCCATGTCATCCTTATCACCTATGCCTCCCTGGTGGTGCTG 1447 Q T A L G G P F H V I L I T Y A S L V V L 441 Transmembrane domain 3 CTGTGCGTGTTCAGGGTCAGCGAGGTGCAGGGGGAGGCGGTCCTCATGGCCCTGGCCCTGGTG 1510 L C V F R V S E V Q G E A V L M A L A L V 462 CTGGGCTGGAGCAATGTCATGTTCTTCGCTCGAGGATTCCAGATGCTGGGCCCCTACGTCATC 1573 L G W S N V M F F A R G F Q M L G P Y V I 483 Transmembrane domain 4 ATGATACAGAAGATTATATTTGGAGACCTGACGAAGTTCATGTGGCTGAGGTTCGTGGTGCTC 1636 M I Q K I I F G D L T K F M W L R F V V L 504 Transmembrane domain 5 ATGGGATTTTCCTCCGCCTTGTGGGTGGTGTACATGACAGAGGACCCAGACTCTCTGCCGCCA 1699 M G F S S A L W V V Y M T E D P D S L P P 525 TTCGGGTACTTCCCCATCACACTGTTCTCCAAGTTTGAGCTGTGTGTGAGTCTGATAGACCTC 1762 F G Y F P I T L F S K F E L C V S L I D L 546 Pore region CCTGTGGACCACAGCATCAACATGCCCTTCATGGTCAGCGTGGTGAACTGCACCTTCTCTATG 1825 P V D H S I N M P F M V S V V N C T F S M 567
RT-PCR antisense primer GTCTCCAACATGCTCCTGCTCAACCTGTTCATAGCCATGATGGGCGACACCCACTGGAGGGTG 1888 V S N M L L L N L F I A M M G D T H W R V 588
Transmembrane domain 6 GCCCAGGAGAGGGACGAGCTCTGGAGGGCCCAGGTTGTGGCCACCACAGTGATGCTGGAGAGG 1951 A Q E R D E L W R A Q V V A T T V M L E R 609 AAGCTGCCTCGCTGCCTGTGGCCTCGACTCGGGGTGTGTGGCCTGGAGTACGGTCTGGGGGAG 2014 K L P R C L W P R L G V C G L E Y G L G E 630 CGCTGGTTCCTGCGGGTTGAGGACCGAAATGACCCGCTGGTTCAGAAGATGCGTCGCTACGTG 2077 R W F L R V E D R N D P L V Q K M R R Y V 651 AAAGCCTTCTCTAACAAGGAGGATGACCACGAACAACCGGCGGAGAAGGAGGCCATGAGGTGT 2140 K A F S N K E D D H E Q P A E K E A M R C 672 CAGGGTCTAGAACCTATCTGGTTCGAACTTAAAACGACAGGATCTCCAAACAGGAAGTCCCTG 2203 Q G L E P I W F E L K T T G S P N R K S L 693 ACAGGCTGGCAGATGATTCGCCACAGCACCCTGGGGTTAGATCTGGGACAGGAGGAGCCAGAA 2266 T G W Q M I R H S T L G L D L G Q E E P E 714 GATGACCAGGAAGTCAAGTATCTGTAGCAACAAATCCTGTGACTGGAGAACTGAGTGGCTCAG 2329 D D Q E V K Y L . 722 ATTGTAAGGACAAAAGCTGTTCCTGTGATGTTATTATGCATAGAAAAGGGTATTATTTTTGGA 2392 TAACAAATGTGGAAAGTAGATTAGCTAGTACACGCATTCCAAATTGGGTTGAAATGTTAATAA 2455 TATCTGTTTAATTGACTTATGTGGCTTTCAAGTAGATTCCACGGCAATGTTTTTTACACTCTA 2518 AGAGATTTACGAGACAGAATATGATCATTAAAGTGTTAGTGGAAACGGTTTTTTTCTTGATGG 2581 TAATATCCTGACAGAAAACAAAATGGCCATTTGATGGTAATGGTCATTGTATAGAATGGTCTC 2644 GAATGGAGAAGAAATACCGAAGCTAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA 2687
Fig.·1. The complete nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequence of crayfish Procambarus clarkii antennal gland (kidney) epithelial Ca2+
channel (ECaC) cDNA (GenBank accession number AY452713). Nucleotides and amino acids are numbered to the right of the sequence. The start and stop codons are indicated in bold letters. Transmembrane domains and putative pore-forming region are in bold and underlined. The gray boxes indicate the primers used for real-time PCR, RT-PCR and the probe used for in situ hybridization.
THE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
1816
Procambarus clarkii 18s rRNA gene (accession number AF436001). The reaction mixture (20·l) contained 2·l of 10 SYBR Green PCR buffer, 3·l of 25·mmol·l–1 MgCl2, 2·l of dNTP mix (2.5·mmol·l–1 dATP, 2.5·mmol·l–1 dCTP, 2.5·mmol·l–1 dGTP and 5·mmol·l–1 dUTP), 0.125·l of AmpliTaq Gold (5·U·l–1), 0.25·l of AmpErase UNG 91·U·l–1), 2·l of template cDNA and 4.08·l of each 5·mol·l–1 primers in water.
Real-time PCR reactions were performed in a 96-well microtiter plate using the relative quantification Ct method. The threshold cycle (Ct) represents the PCR cycle at which an increase in SYBR Green fluorescence can first be detected above a baseline signal. Real-time PCR conditions were as follows: 50°C for 2·min and then 95°C for 10·min for one cycle, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15·s, and then 60°C for 1·min on an ABI prism 7900HT sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems). For an 18s rRNA reaction mix, 4.08·l of each 1·mol·l–1 primers and 2·l of 0.1 diluted cDNA were used. The cDNA sample was analyzed in triplicate and the fold-change relative to the control tissue (liver for differential tissue expression) or condition (intermolt for relative expression in antennal gland with molting stage) was calculated based on the relative quantification Ct method. Relative quantification (RQ) was performed by normalizing the Ct values of each sample gene with the Ct value of the endogenous control 18s rRNA gene (Ct), and was finally calculated using Ct of the control tissue/condition as calibrator. Ct corresponds to the difference between the Ct of the gene of interest and the Ct of the endogenous control 18s rRNA. Fold-change in expression was calculated as RQ=2Ct. Several controls were performed to ensure proper PCR amplification. Negative controls consisting of no template and PCR performed on samples not subjected to reverse transcription were run on every plate. In addition, efficiency controls were performed to confirm that the target sequence amplified at the same efficiency as the endogenous control (18s rRNA) for each primer set tested.
For the quantitative RT-PCR, two primers, 5-GGCTG - CCAAGGAGGGTAA-3 (sense) and 5-CTCTCCTGGGC - CA CCCT-3 (antisense), were designed corresponding to nucleotides 868-1900·bp and targeting a fragment of 1032·bp from transmembrane domain 1 to transmembrane domain 6 (Fig.·1). RT-PCR reactions (PCR total volume 50·l) included 2·l of first-strand cDNA, 20·mmol–1 Tris HCl (pH 8.4), 50·mmol–1 KCl, 1.5·mmol–1 MgCl2, 0.2·mmol–1 dNTP mix, 0.1–0.2·mol–1 of each primer and 2.5 units of Taq DNA polymerase (Gibco-BRL). RT-PCR cycles were: 94°C, 3·min, followed by 30 cycles of 94°C for 30·s, 55°C for 1·min, 72°C for 1·min, and a final cycle of 72°C for 10·min. RT-PCR reactions contained primers to amplify a 518·bp fragment of 18s rRNA as control. PCR products from real-time and quantitative PCR (15·l) were analyzed by electrophoresis on a 1.0% agarose gel with 0.5·g·ml–1 of ethidium bromide in 1 TAE buffer (40·mmol·l–1 Tris, 40·mmol·l–1 sodium acetate and 1·mmol·l–1 EDTA, pH 7.2). The DNA bands were visualized with ultraviolet light.
In situ hybridization In situ hybridization was performed as outlined previously
[Wheatly et al. (Wheatly et al., 2004), as adapted for crayfish from a mammalian protocol, Key et al. (Key et al., 2001)]. Antennal glands were dissected from crayfish at different molting stages and placed in pre-chilled 4% paraformaldehyde [PFA (w/v), 0.1·mol·l–1 sodium acetate, pH 6.5–7.5] for one day. The tissue was then placed in 4% PFA/20% sucrose for 3–6 days at 4°C. After fixation, the tissues were wrapped tightly in aluminium foil, placed in a ziploc bag and stored at –80°C until processing. The tissue blocks were removed from the freezer and placed in the Cryostat (Cm3050; Leica, Nussloch, Germany) at –20°C for 30·min, before being mounted on cold specimen holders with tissue-freezing medium. Serial 20·m transverse sections were taken, transferred on 0.2% gelatin-coated slides and stored at –80°C.
In situ hybridization was used to localize and visualize ECaC mRNA sequences by hybridizing a complementary nucleotide probe designed from the crayfish antennal gland ECaC cDNA sequence (GenBank accession number AY452713). The antisense of this probe sequence was 5-GAACACGCAC - AGCAGCACCACCAGGGAGGCATAGGT-3, and the sense of this probe sequence (used as a negative control for non- specific hybridization) was 5-ACCTATGCCTCCCTGGTG - GTGCTGCTGTGCGTGTTC-3. The ECaC probe was 36·bp in length and was located in the transmembrane domain 3 region (see Fig.·1 for probe location).
The probe (20·pmol·l–1) was 35S labeled with a terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TDT) kit (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN, USA). The oligonucleotide probe was incubated at 37°C for 90·min as follows: 5·l of 4·pmol·l–1 probe, 4·l of ddH2O, 5·l of 5 terminal transferase buffer, 5·l of CoCl2, 2·l of TdT (400·U) and 4·l of 35S-dATP (1250·Ci·mmol·l–1; NEN Life Sciences, Boston, MA, USA). Then, 50·l of 0.1·mol·l–1 Tris-HCl/TEA (triethanolamine)/EDTA was added. Unincorporated radiolabel was removed in a Mini Quick Spin DNA column (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), and the probe was diluted in hybridization buffer [4 SSC, 50% formamide (v/v), 1 Denhardt, 250·g·ml–1 yeast tRNA, 10% dextran sulfate (v/v), 10·mmol·l–1 DTT, 500·g·ml–1 boiled salmon sperm DNA] to yield approximately 0.5106·cpm 100·l–1, and stored at –20°C before use.
For the hybridization, the slides were pre-washed in 0.01·mol·l–1 phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4) for 15·min, then in 2 SSC (0.3·mol·l–1 NaCl, 0.03·mol·l–1 sodium citrate) for 30·min at RT. After washing, approximately 30·l of dilute sterile probe hybridization solution was added to each tissue section. The slides were kept inside a humid chamber in the incubator at 37°C overnight. After hybridization, the slides were postwashed with 1 SSC at RT for 1·h, followed by three washes with 1 SSC at RT for 15·min and then with 1 SSC at 50°C for 30·min. Finally, the slides were gently rinsed with 0.01·mol·l–1 PBS for 10·min at RT. After washing, the slides were placed on the slide warmer at a very low setting for 10·min, prior to being placed in the Fuji Film BAS Cassette
Y. Gao and M. G. Wheatly
THE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
1817Cloning and characterization of crayfish EcaC
with a BAS-IIIs imaging plate along with high and low standards to convert intensity to·Ci. Fuji Films were scanned after 1–3 days of exposure in a Fuji FLA-2000 scanner (Fuji Photo Film, Tokyo, Japan) attached to a Power Macintosh 7300/200 computer with Image Gauge v3.3 software (Apple Computer, Cupertino, CA, USA). Parallel sections were examined with standard histology (staining with cresyl violet) and photographed with a KODAK EDAS 290 digital camera to correlate radioactive labeling with cellular structure of the antennal gland.
Results Cloning of crayfish ECaC
A pair of degenerate primers was successfully used in amplifying a 626·bp fragment of cDNA from crayfish postmolt antennal gland. A GenBank search confirmed that this fragment matched exclusively with ECaCs from rainbow trout (81%), pufferfish (80%), human (65%) and rabbit (66%). The deduced amino acid sequence showed 82–84% homology with rainbow trout and pufferfish and 63–71% homology with human and rabbit. Based on the 626·bp partial sequence, a 1399·bp fragment from 5 RACE and a 662·bp from 3 RACE were successfully amplified.
The complete nucleotide sequence and deduced amino acid sequence of crayfish antennal gland ECaC (referred to as ECaC1, now TRPV5) is shown in Fig.·1. This 2687·bp nucleotide sequence consists of an open reading frame of 2169·bp, coding for 722 amino acid residues with a predicted molecular mass of 81.7·kDa. There is a 124·bp non-coding region at the 5 terminal and a 394·bp non-coding region with a poly(A) tail at the 3 terminal. A GenBank search using the BLAST algorithm revealed that the crayfish antennal gland ECaC matched exclusively at the mRNA level with ECaC from rainbow trout (76%), pufferfish (78%), human (62%) and rabbit (56%). The deduced amino acid sequence of crayfish antennal gland ECaC matched with published ECaCs; specifically, the percent homology was greater with fish (80–82%) and rainbow trout (80%) than mammalian species (52–60%; Fig.·2). A search in the protein database also revealed a significant but low homology (20%) to previously published ion channels, including rat capsaicin receptor (VR1, now TRPV1; VRL, now TRPV2) (Caterina et al., 1997; Caterina et al., 1999) and mouse growth factor-regulated
Crayfish MS-----PSLARSAPSELNHRW-SQFRFRLHNRKGWKEMLDETFLLDNKKI 45 Pufferfish **-----************W**-T*L****Q*K***N*********YT*** 45 Rainbow trout *A-----*A******G****W*-*******Q***************Q**RT 45 Human *--------------------------------------------*QQ*R* 7 Rabbit *GACPPKAKGPWAQLQKLLIS*PV-------GEQD*EQYR*RVNM*QQER* 44 Rat *G-----VKKPWIQLQKRLNW*-V-------REQD*NQHV*QLHM*QQ*S*
Crayfish NNIPLFYAAPENNAGCIKKLLGCSSTNIFERGALGETALHVAVMNDNVEAA 96 Pufferfish ***********S********************************S**LD** 96 Rainbow trout *GV***F**K*SS********D*A*******R***************M*** 96 Human LES**LR**L**DLMVLRQ**LDCTCDVRQ************ALY**L*** 58 Rabbit RDS**LQ**K*SDLRLL*I**LNQ*CD*QQ***V********ALY**L*** 95 Rat WES**LR**K**DMCTL*R*QHDQNCDFRQ************ALY**LD** 89 Ankyrin repeat Crayfish LVLMEGAPELINEPMTSELFLGVTPLHIAVVNQNVNLVHDLISRGADVATP 147 Pufferfish V*******************Q*************I***QH*****G*A*** 147 Rainbow trout *A********************MK**********F***RS**GK******* 147 Human IM***T**Y*VT*STLC*P*V*Q*A****IM*******RA*LA***SASA- 109 Rabbit TL***A****AK**ALC*P*V*Q*A*****M*******RA*LA***S*SA- 147 Rat IM***T**Y*VT*STLC*P*V*Q*A****IM*******RA*LA***SASA- 140 domain Ankyrin repeat domain Crayfish RVTGLYFRKRIGGLIYYGEHILSFAACVGNEDIISLIIDAGASTRAQDSLG 198 Pufferfish **************************A*****************V***YR* 198 Rainbow trout **********R*******************Q****MV*NV*********I* 198 Human *A**AA**RSPHN*******P*******NS*E*VR*L*EH**DI******* 159 Rabbit *A**AA**RSPHN*******P********S*E*VR*L*EH**DI******* 196 Rat *A**SA**RSSHN*******P********S*E*VR*L*EH**DI******* 188 Ankyrin repeat domain Crayfish NTVLHILVLQPNKTIACQVLDLLLARDGELDQPVPLDMVPNHQGLTPFKLA 249 Pufferfish *****V************AM**IM***A****S********SR******** 249 Rainbow trout *****************LVL*******I****A********YH******** 249 Human *******I******F***MYN***SY**HG*HLQ***L************* 209 Rabbit *******I******F***MYN***SY*EHS*HLQS**************** 246 Rat **************F***MYN***SH**-G*HLKS*EL***N********* 240
Crayfish AKEGNPVAFQHLVNKRRLIQWTLGPLTSNLYDLTEIDSWADDM--SGLELV 298 Pufferfish *****R***********VV**S******Y************G*--*V***I 298 Rainbow trout *****L********R**IN**N************G***LV***DC*V**HI 300 Human GV***T******MQ***H****Y*****I**********GEEL--*F**** 259 Rabbit GV***T******MQ**KHV***C*****T**********GEEL--*F**** 296 Rat GV***T******MQ**KHI**S******SI*********GE*L--*F**** 289
Crayfish VGSKKREARRILELTPVKQLVSFKWNLYGRQYFRMLGLLYLLYIGTFTLCC 349 Pufferfish ***QQK***G*******MR***L******KH***L*L************** 349 Rainbow trout ********KR***V***R***********KH***L*L************** 351 Human *S*D*****Q***Q****E*******K***P**CI*AA*****M****T** 310 Rabbit *S*K*****Q***Q****E******KK***P**CV*AS*****MIC**T** 347 Rat *S*K*K***Q***Q****E***L**KK**QP**CL**M**IF*MIC**T** 340
◊◊ ◊ Transmembrane domain 1 Crayfish VYRPLKDTPENYTESELDNTIRVQKTLQESYVTRDDNLRLVGELISVLGAV 400 Pufferfish T******IS****K****H***************E*S******V******L 400 Rainbow trout *******A*****V*DM*K********K*****YG*****A**M******L 402 Human ******FRGG*R*H*R-*I**LQ**L***A*E**E*II******V*IV*** 360 Rabbit I*****LRDD*R*DPR-*I**LQ**L***A***HQ**I******VT*T*** 397 Rat ******FRDA*R*HVR-***VLE**P***A***YQ*KV******VT*I*** 390 Transmembrane domain 2 Crayfish VILLLEIPDILRVGAKRYFGQTALGGPFHVILITYASLVVLLCVFRVSEVQ 399 Pufferfish **********I**********************S************AC*** 451 Rainbow trout ******V**M******H****************A**F***********G** 453 Human I*********F****S****K*I********I*******LVTM*M*LTNTN 411 Rabbit I*********F****S******I********I*******L*TM*M*LTNMN 448 Rat **********F****S****H*V********I*******L*IM*M*LTSMN 441
Transmembrane domain 3 Crayfish GEAVLMALALVLGWSNVMFFARGFQMLGPYVIMIQKIIFGDLTKFMWLRFV 502 Pufferfish ****V***S***************E**********************FS*I 502 Rainbow trout **T*V**VC***************************************S*I 504 Human **V*PMSF******CS**Y*T*********T*****M*****MR****MA* 462 Rabbit **V*PLSF******CS**Y**********FT*****M*****MR****MA* 499 Rat **V*PISM******CS**Y*S********FT*****M*****LR****MAM 492 Transmembrane domain 4 Transmembrane domain 5 Crayfish VLMGFSSALWVVYMTEDPDSLPPFGYFPITLFSKFELCVSLIDLPVDHSIN 553 Pufferfish **I*Y*T********Q****M***RS*******E***S*G********R*M 553 Rainbow trout **I***TS*******Q******AYRS*******Q***S*G*******T*TT 555 Human **L**A**FYIIFQ****T**GQ*YDY*MA***T***FLTV**A*ANYDVD 513 Rabbit **L**A**FHITFQ****NN*GE*SDY*TA***T***FLTI**GP*NY*VD 550 Rat **L**A**FYIIFQ****E**GE*SDY*TAM**T***FLTI**GP*NY*VD 543 Pore region Crayfish MPFMVSVVNCTFSMVSNMLLLNLFIAMMGDTHWRVAQERDELWRAQVVATT 604 Pufferfish T*PI*H*LH****L**YI*****L****S********************** 604 Rainbow trout ***I*H*LH****V**YI*****LT***S*Q******************** 606 Human L***F*I*NFA*AIIATL********************************* 564 Rabbit L***YCITYAA*AIIATL*M******************************* 601 Rat L-**Y*LTYFA*AIIATL*M******************************* 594 Transmembrane domain 6 Crayfish VMLERKLPRCLWPRLGVCGLEYGLGERWFLRVEDRNDPLVQKMRRYVKAF- 655 Pufferfish L****R******************K***Y**********F******I***- 655 Rainbow trout L****R**************L*******Y******************Q**- 657 Human **************S*I**C*F***D*******NH**QNPLRVL***EV*K 605 Rabbit ******M**F****S*I**Y*****D*******NHH*QNPLRVL***E**K 652 Rat ******M**F****S*I**C*****D*******HHQEQNPLRVL***E**K 645
Crayfish -SNKEDDHEQP------AEKE---------AMRC—QGLEPIWFELKTTGSP 686 Pufferfish -*K---EDDTD------*KTD---------TTKDFIP-**TQ*--G****E 686 Rainbow trout -*K---*ED*SKEREEMENTD---------MSK---P*S*L*--RT*HR*G 692 Human N*D****Q*HP------SE*QPSGAESGTL*RAS--LA**TS--S*SR*A* 658 Rabbit C*D***GQ**L------SE*RPSTVESGMLSRAS—-VAFQTP--S*SR*T* 695 Rat S*D**EVQ**L------SE*QPSGTETGTL*RGS--VV*QTP--P*SR*T* 688
◊
Fig.·2. The alignment of the deduced crayfish Procambarus clarkii ECaC protein sequence with pufferfish ECaC (GenBank accession number AY232821), rainbow trout ECaC (AY256348), human ECAC1 (AJ271207), rabbit ECaC (AJ133128) and rat CaT1 (AF160798). Amino acids are numbered on the right and significant residue identities are indicated by an asterisk (*). Light-gray boxes indicate ankyrin repeat domains, dark-gray boxes are predicted transmembrane domains and the black box is the putative pore- forming region. The putative protein kinase A and C phosphorylation sites are also indicated by closed and open diamonds, respectively.
THE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
1818
channel (GRC, now TRPV2) (Kanzaki et al., 1999) and other transient receptor potential (TRP)-related ion channels (Birnbaumer et al., 1996).
The hydropathy profile of crayfish ECaC exhibits a putative secondary structure common to other ECaCs (Fig.·3) consisting of six transmembrane-spanning domains, a short hydrophobic stretch predicted as the pore-forming region between transmembrane domains 5 and 6, and three ankyrin repeat domains (Fig.·3). Phylogenetic analysis between crayfish ECaC and other channels (Fig.·4) suggests that crayfish ECaC belongs to the same family as ECaCs from human, rat, mouse, rabbit, rainbow trout and pufferfish; of these, the closest phylogenetic relationship is with rainbow trout and pufferfish. There is a lower phylogenetic relationship with other ion channels [transient receptor potential channel (TRPC); GRC/VRL, now TRPV2; and VR1, now TRPV1].
Tissue-specific ECaC mRNA expression
Real-time (Fig.·5A) and quantitative RT-PCR data (Fig.·5B) confirmed that, relative to 18s rRNA, ECaC mRNA is most abundantly expressed in postmolt epithelial tissues and was virtually undetectable in egg and muscle. Real-time PCR analysis indicated that ECaC expression in all epithelia was 1000–2000-fold greater than in non-epithelial tissues (cardiac and tail muscle; data not shown). Epithelial expression was quantified relative to hepatopancreas (lowest expression of the epithelial tissues tested); expression was 9.9-fold greater in gill, and greatest (15.3-fold greater) in the antennal gland. Quantitative RT-PCR data confirmed that, although expression of 18s rRNA was comparable in all tissues tested, amplification of the 1032·bp ECaC fragment was most abundant in gill and antennal gland (Fig.·5B). Under these experimental conditions, expression was undetectable in hepatopancreas, egg and muscle. Collectively, these data confirm that ECaC is expressed exclusively in epithelia and that expression is significantly higher in gill or antennal gland than in hepatopancreas in postmolt stage.
ECaC mRNA expression and localization in antennal gland during molt stages
ECaC mRNA expression in antennal gland increased in pre- and postmolt stages compared with intermolt (Fig.·6). Real- time PCR data (Fig.·6A), using intermolt expression levels as calibrator, indicated that the expression of ECaC mRNA increased by 7.4- and 23.8-fold at premolt and postmolt stages, respectively. This was confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR (Fig.·6B), which showed significant amplification of the 1032·bp fragment in pre- and postmolt compared with virtually undetectable levels in intermolt. Meanwhile, the 518·bp 18s rRNA PCR product was expressed at constant levels.
Localization of ECaC in transverse sections of the antennal gland using in situ hybridization confirmed that ECaC mRNA expression increased in premolt with a further increase in postmolt compared with intermolt expression (Fig.·7; upper panels). Closer examination of antennal gland structure [Fig.·7; middle panels with reference to prior ultrastructural studies in
Wheatly et al. (Wheatly et al., 2004)] revealed that ECaC hybridization was associated with the labyrinth and nephridial canal regions in intermolt sections, and that the increased expression during pre- and postmolt was largely restricted to these regions rather than the coelomosac or bladder. No significant binding was observed to the sense probe (Fig.·7; lower panels), confirming authenticity of the antisense probe.
Discussion Cloning and sequencing of crayfish ECaC
This study has described the cloning and expression of an epithelial Ca2+ channel ECaC-like gene from the antennal gland (kidney) of the crustacean crayfish Procambarus clarkii. This is the first ECaC sequenced in an invertebrate. In addition to sharing structural features with cloned ECaCs, crayfish ECaC is expressed exclusively in epithelial tissues and abundance is proportional to Ca2+ influx (Hoenderop et al., 2000b).
The crayfish ECaC cDNA encodes a protein with highest identity to fish ECaCs (68–82%) and lower identity to mammalian ECaCs (52–60%). The predicted amino acid sequence of crayfish ECaC exhibits structural features common to other ECaCs, namely six transmembrane-spanning domains with a putative pore-forming region between transmembrane domains 5 and 6, three ankyrin repeats, and phosphorylation sites. (The crayfish ECaC cDNA sequence has been accepted to the GenBank database under the accession number AY452713.) Mammalian researchers (Hoenderop et al., 2000b) speculated that four monomers of ECaC constitute a functional tetrameric ion channel. ECaC contains conserved potential regulatory sites, including putative phosphorylation sites for protein kinase C, cAMP-dependent protein kinase and cGMP-dependent protein kinase. They also contain structural domains such as N-linked glycosylation sites and ankyrin repeats, which interact with the cytoskeleton to assemble and stabilize proteins in the plasma membrane (Müller et al., 2000a); the latter can also bind to diverse proteins associated with Ca2+ homeostasis, such as inositol-(1,4,5)-trisphosphate (IP3) and ryanodine receptors. Hoenderop et al. has suggested that protein kinase C directly phosphorylates the channel to regulate activity (Hoenderop et al., 2002a; Hoenderop et al., 2002b).
ECaC does not possess the residues that confer sensitivity to depolarization in voltage-gated Ca2+ channels. Overall, the primary structure bears little resemblance to either voltage- gated or ligand-operated Ca2+ channels. Detailed analysis (Hoenderop et al., 2000a; Hoenderop et al., 2000b) of the pore- forming region and the region flanking transmembrane segment 6 showed a low but significant homology with capsaicin receptors and the TRP channels.
Phylogenetic analysis (Fig.·4) indicated that the crayfish ECaC is a new member of the ECaC superfamily that includes the fish ECaCs and the mammalian ECaC/CaT genes (Hoenderop et al., 1999a; Müller et al., 2000a). ECaCs from
Y. Gao and M. G. Wheatly
THE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
1819Cloning and characterization of crayfish EcaC
crayfish, pufferfish and trout clustered together, forming a distinct group from mammalian ECaCs, suggesting that invertebrate, fish and mammalian genes are not orthologous. Gene mapping of the two mammalian ECaC isoforms, ECaC1 (TRPV5) and ECaC2/CaT1 (TRPV6) (Müller et al., 2000b), showed that they are localized adjacent to each other on the same chromosome, suggesting gene duplication that occurred after the divergence of fish and mammals. Both phylogeny and chromosome mapping results indicated that there was only one gene encoding ECaC in zebrafish (Pan et al., 2005) and pufferfish (Qiu and Hogstrand, 2004). Collectively, these
studies suggest that ECaCs from crayfish, fish and mammals evolved from a common ancestral gene.
There is evolutionary distance (<30% homology) between crayfish ECaC and other ion channels, including capsaicin receptor (a non-selective cation channel that functions as a transducer of painful thermal stimuli; VR1, now TRPV1; and VRL, now TRPV2) (Caterina et al., 1997; Caterina et al., 1999), GRC (now TRPV2) (Kanzaki et al., 1999) and the canonical TRPC (proposed to mediate the entry of extracellular Ca2+ into cells in response to depletion of IC Ca2+ stores) (Birnbaumer et al., 1996) or olfactory channels (OSM9) (Colbert et al., 1997).
Mammalian ECaC and CaT1 (TRPV6) have been expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes (Peng et al., 2003a; Peng et al., 2003b) in order to characterize the physiological properties. That study has shown that ECaC mediates passive apical entry down the electrochemical gradient, that it is constitutively active and not voltage- or ligand-gated, that it is selective for Ca2+, has a Km of between 0.2 and 0.66·mmol·l–1 and that it has a feedback-inhibition mechanism to prevent toxic accumulation of free Ca2+ in the cell. Ca2+ influx is not coupled to Na+, Cl– or H+ gradients, although activity is linked to pH. Like most electrogenic processes, hyperpolarizing potential favors Ca2+ influx. Functional expression of pufferfish ECaC in Madin- Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells confirmed that in addition to a role in Ca2+ uptake, pufferfish ECaC might serve as a pathway for zinc and iron acquisition (Qiu and Hogstrand, 2003).
Tissue-specific ECaC expression
The present study of postmolt tissues clearly showed that crayfish ECaC was expressed virtually exclusively in epithelial tissues implicated in Ca2+ transport (antennal gland, gill and hepatopancreas), and that expression levels reflected a relative role in Ca2+
absorption in postmolt stage. The antennal gland exhibited the highest expression, consistent with perceived high rates of postfiltrational renal Ca2+
reabsorption (Wheatly, 1999) that are hypothesized to increase in postmolt. The next highest expression was in gill, long acknowledged as a primary route for postmolt Ca2+ entry for mineralization. Lower
expression levels in hepatopancreas suggest that Ca2+ entry via digestive epithelium may be less important in the immediate postmolt than postfiltrational reabsorption or branchial uptake (Zanotto and Wheatly, 2002). This is in agreement with the observation that crustaceans typically refrain from feeding around ecdysis and only resume once mouthparts and other appendages are adequately hardened several days postmolt. There is reason to predict that expression levels will be higher in intermolt in this particular epithelium. Lack of expression in eggs suggests that the gene may be developmentally regulated.
1 2 3
9 723
)
Fig.·3. Hydrophobicity plot for crayfish Procambarus clarkii ECaC (GenBank accession number AY452713) in comparison with rainbow trout ECaC (AY256348), pufferfish ECaC (AY232821), human ECAC1 (AJ271207), rabbit ECaC (AJ133128) and rat CaT1 (AF160798) sequences. Transmembrane domains are numbered from 1-6 and the putative pore- forming region is indicated by the letter ‘P’. Hydrophobicity values were determined by the method of Kyte and Doolittle (Kyte and Doolittle, 1982), using a window of 19 residues (http://arbl.cvmbs.colostate.edu/molkit/ hydropathy/index.html).
THE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
1820
In rainbow trout (Perry et al., 2003), ECaC was only identified through quantitative RT-PCR in gills, with a faint band in heart. It was undetectable in kidney, intestine, white muscle and blood. A recent study (Shahsavarani et al., 2006) reported that the rainbow trout ECaC was not restricted to mitochondria-rich cells of gills but was also expressed in pavement cells. In the FW zebrafish (Pan et al., 2005), ECaC was ubiquitously expressed in all tissues examined (brain, heart, gills, intestine, liver and kidney); however, expression was highest in the gills and kidney. In the marine pufferfish (Qiu and Hogstrand, 2004) expression was abundant in gill; ECaC was not found in the kidney, consistent with the finding that marine teleost fish do not postfiltrationally reabsorb Ca2+
(Hickman and Trump, 1969). Expression of the ECaC transcript in pufferfish intestine was low, confirming that, as in crayfish, the intestine of teleost fish is less important than the gill in Ca2+ absorption (Flik and Verbost, 1993). As in invertebrates, pharmacological evidence has suggested that
other types of Ca2+ channel may mediate brush-border membrane Ca2+ uptake in fish enterocytes (Larsson et al., 2002).
Mammalian ECaC is typically associated with 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25(OH)2D3]-responsive epithelia that facilitate Ca2+ absorption (Hoenderop et al., 1999a; Hoenderop et al., 2000a; Hoenderop et al., 2000b; Peng et al., 1999; Zhuang et al., 2002). In rabbit kidney (Hoenderop et al., 1999a), ECaC mRNA and protein were expressed primarily in the distal part of the nephron, the region associated with Ca2+
regulation. ECaC protein was immunolocalized at the apical domain of the connecting tubule (Peng et al., 2000b). Importantly, ECaC was colocalized with calbindin-D28K (the
Y. Gao and M. G. Wheatly
Mouse CaT (TRPV6)
Mouse ECaC (TRPV5)
Rat CaT1 (TRPV6)
Human CaT1 (TRPV6)
Human CaT2 (TRPV5)
Human ECaC1 (TRPV5)
Rabbit ECaC (TRPV5)
Rat ECaC1 (TRPV5)
Rainbow ECaC (TRPV5)
Pufferfish ECaC (TRPV5)
Crayfish ECaC (TRPV5)
Human TRP3 (TRPC3)
Human TRP4 (TRPC4)
Chicken VR-OAC (TRPV4)
Fig.·4. Phylogram based on full-length sequences of crayfish ECaC (GenBank accession number AY452713), rainbow trout ECaC (AY256348), pufferfish ECaC (AY232821), rabbit ECaC (AJ133128), human CaT1 (AF365928), human CaT2 (AF209196), human ECAC1 (AJ271207), human VR1 (AAG43466), human TRP3 (NP_003296), human TRP4 (XP-027181), mouse ECaC (336378), mouse CaT (AB037373), mouse TRP2 (AF111107), mouse TRP5 (AF029983), mouse TRP6 (U49069), mouse GRC (AB0216650), rat CaT1 (AF160798), rat ECaC1 (NP_446239), rat VR1 (AF029310), rat VRT (AF1291130) and chicken VR-OAC (AAG28026).
H ep
at op
an cr
ea s
A nt
en na
n
A
B
Fig.·5. (A) Real-time PCR assay for the relative expression of crayfish Procambarus clarkii ECaC mRNA in postmolt hepatopancreas, gill and antennal gland. Expression in postmolt cardiac and axial muscle was undetectably low relative to expression in epithelial tissues and so data were not included. Relative quantification (RQ expressed as mean ± s.d. from three different samples with 4-5 crayfish in each sample) was performed by normalizing the Ct value of each sample with the Ct value of the endogenous control (18s rRNA gene, Ct), and finally calculated using Ct of control (hepatopancreas) as calibrator. (B) Quantitative RT-PCR showing distribution of Procambarus clarkii ECaC (upper panel) and 18s rRNA (lower panel) in a range of postmolt crayfish tissues.
THE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
1821Cloning and characterization of crayfish EcaC
Ca2+-binding protein that facilitates cytosolic diffusion of Ca2+
from apical influx to basolateral efflux sites), NCX and PMCA (Peng et al., 2000b).
In rabbit, ECaC was also identified in placenta and in the proximal small intestine (duodenum, jejunum); however, it was not detected in the ileum, colon, lung, muscle, liver or brain. In intestine, ECaC was present in a thin layer along the apical membrane of the duodenal villus tip, whereas a complete colocalization was observed between ECaC, calbindin-D9K and PMCA, but not NCX (Peng et al., 2000b). In humans it was also detected in other epithelial tissues, such as testis, prostate and placenta (Müller et al., 2000a), and in non-epithelial tissues, such as brain and pancreas. This raises the interesting question of the role ECaC plays in non-epithelial tissues. Mammalian researchers have suggested that it serves to control Ca2+ entry and regulate IC Ca2+ concentration, and may be involved in cell proliferation, differentiation and signal transduction (Putney, 2001; Zhuang et al., 2002). In endocrine
cells it may regulate cytosolic Ca levels in order to modulate depolarization-stimulated insulin release.
In human, CaT1 (now TRPV6) (Peng et al., 2000a; Weber et al., 2001) is abundant in the proximal small intestine (primarily duodenum), the site of Ca2+ absorption. Strong signals were also detected in placenta and exocrine tissues (salivary gland, prostate and pancreas) where it probably mediates reuptake of Ca2+ following its release by secretory vesicles. Although kidney and intestine both engage in Ca2+
absorption, there are differences in the vitamin D-regulated calbindins involved (D9K versus D28K, respectively), and so it is not surprising that different ECaC proteins are involved (Peng et al., 1999).
Relative expression of ECaC in antennal gland in different molt stages
The present study demonstrated increased expression of crayfish ECaC mRNA in antennal gland in the premolt and postmolt phases of the molting cycle as compared with baseline intermolt levels (Fig.·6); furthermore, it localized these increases to the labyrinth and nephridial canal regions of antennal gland slices, areas long associated with ion reabsorption. This suggests that the ECaC abundance at a transporting epithelium is proportional to the magnitude of unidirectional Ca2+ influx. In intermolt the crayfish reabsorbed 97% of Ca2+ filtered at the antennal gland (renal unidirectional influx of 70·equiv·kg–1·h–1) (Wheatly and Toop, 1989), which exceeded unidirectional influx at the gill (Wheatly, 1999). In
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
B
Fig.·6. (A) Real-time PCR assay for the expression of crayfish Procambarus clarkii ECaC mRNA in antennal gland at different molting stages. Relative quantification (RQ expressed as mean ± s.d. from three different samples with 4-5 crayfish in each sample) was performed by normalizing the Ct value of each sample with the Ct value of the endogenous control (18s rRNA gene, Ct) and finally calculated using Ct of control (intermolt) as calibrator. (B) Quantitative RT-PCR assay of crayfish Procambarus clarkii ECaC (upper panel) and 18s rRNA (lower panel) in antennal gland at different stages of molting cycle.
Fig.·7. Upper: representative digitized computer images of in situ hybridization of ECaC antisense probe in Procambarus clarkii antennal gland sections in various molting stages. Abundance of mRNA is illustrated by increasing yellow/orange intensity compared with control (blue). Lower: representative digitized computer images of in situ hybridization of ECaC sense probe in Procambarus clarkii antennal gland sections in various molting stages. Middle: structural regions of the antennal gland (scale bar, 100·m), including bladder (B), coelomosac (C), labyrinth (L) and nephridial canal (NC).
THE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
1822
the late premolt phase, external FW was loaded into the extracellular fluid, causing a hemodilution of 40% as reflected in transitory (48·h) reductions in circulating Na+ and Cl–
(Wheatly, 1996). Hemolymph Ca2+, meanwhile, remained remarkably constant, suggesting that renal Ca2+ reabsorption increased in pre- and postmolt. During this time, activities of ion transport enzymes (carbonic anhydrase, PMCA) increased in the antennal gland (Wheatly, 1997), indirectly confirming that tubular ion reabsorption increased. Measurement of the chemical composition of the urinary filtrate during pre- and postmolt has presented some technical difficulty because urinary cannulation has only been achievable in intermolt stage.
Increased expression of ECaC during pre- and postmolt is consistent with our original hypothesis that abundance is correlated with Ca2+ influx rates. Other studies in our laboratory have used similar techniques to document upregulation (8–18-fold increases) of the primary basolateral Ca2+ efflux mechanisms [PMCA (Gao and Wheatly, 2004; Wheatly et al., 2004); NCX (Stiner et al., 2004)] during pre- and postmolt. This would suggest that genes controlling apical Ca2+ entry (ECaC) and basolateral exit from cells (PMCA, NCX) are closely regulated during periods of elevated transcellular Ca2+ flux. However, the point of entry is logically the gatekeeper and, as such, a prime target for endocrine control of Ca2+ influx.
In situ hybridization revealed that the ECaC upregulation in crayfish antennal gland during pre- and postmolt was localized in the periphery of the transverse sections. When viewed under higher magnification and correlated with prior ultrastructural studies (Wheatly et al., 2004), these regions corresponded to the labyrinth and nephridial canal (Maluf, 1939); hybridization with the coelomosac (site of ultrafiltration) and bladder (urine storage) was less intense. The labyrinth epithelium is composed of cuboidal to columnar cells possessing a brush border, basal invaginations of the plasma membrane, and extensive surface blebbing (Peterson and Loizzi, 1974a; Peterson and Loizzi, 1974b; Fuller et al., 1989). The presence of microvilli, the abundance of mitochondria in the proximity of these microvilli, and the occurrence of endocytotic vesicles along the apical cell membrane collectively suggest an energy- requiring reabsorptive function of this region of the antennal gland. In FW crayfish active ion reabsorption is also strongly associated with the nephridial canal, a region that is missing in marine species that produce isosmotic urine. The histology of the nephridial tubule epithelium resembles that of other cell types pumping ions against a concentration gradient (cells lack a microvillous border but display intense basal invaginations of the plasmalemma associated with numerous mitochondria). A prior study in our laboratory (Wheatly et al., 2004) has shown that the increased PMCA expression associated with elevated unidirectional Ca2+ influx (postmolt compared with intermolt) at the antennal gland is similarly localized predominantly in the nephridial canal and labyrinth. Collectively, these studies confirm that apical and basolateral mechanisms effecting transcellular Ca2+ influx in crayfish
kidney are coordinated spatially as well as temporally. Similarly, in mammalian studies ECaC has been localized in apical membranes of distal convoluted tubule 2 and connecting tubules of the human kidney cortex, as well as brush border of duodenal and jejunal villi (Müller et al., 2001); furthermore, in these tissues ECaC has been colocalized with basolateral proteins involved in active transcellular Ca2+
transport (NCX, PMCA). Studies in other species have confirmed that ECaC
expression is associated with epithelial Ca2+ flux. In zebrafish (Pan et al., 2005), ECaC expression was correlated with Ca2+
influx; wholebody Ca content increased during larval development associated with ossification. Further incubating embryos in low-Ca FW caused induction of upregulation of Ca2+ influx and ECaC expression in gills and skin covering the yolk sac. Expression of both CaT1 and ECaC in duodenum and kidney have been studied in mouse development (Song et al., 2003). Intestinal CaT1 expression increased at weaning with induction of calbindin D9K. Renal CaT and ECaC expression were equally expressed until weaning, when ECaC expression increased and CaT1 decreased. In rats, 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D stimulated active intestinal Ca2+ absorption by increasing ECaC expression. Active reabsorption is also increased after feeding a low-Ca diet or under conditions of Ca2+ deficiency (van Abel et al., 2003). Duodenal expression of CaT1 is also vitamin D-dependent and expression of both CaT1 and ECaC are reduced in vitamin D receptor-knockout mice (van Cromphaut et al., 2001).
Directions for future research
The logical next step in this research program is to generate homologous antibodies to ECaC so that the protein can be quantified and localized within the antennal gland. Identifying a cell system for functional expression will enable better understanding of the biophysical properties of this channel. Possible mechanisms for ECaC activation need to be addressed, such as de novo synthesis of ECaC, activation of existing ECaC channels by regulatory factors [including feedback inhibition of Ca concentration in the microdomain near the inner mouth of the channel (Hoenderop et al., 1999b), direct phosphorylation of the channel, membrane potential and interacting accessory proteins], and shuttling of ECaC between IC vesicles and apical membrane. Ultimately, we propose to study the ECaC promoter through reporter analysis in order to confirm transcriptional regulation of ECaC. Subsequently, promoter regions of apical entry and basolateral exit mechanisms will be studied to reveal regulatory relationships between genes enabling cellular Ca2+ homeostasis. We also propose to examine whether apical ECaC can serve as an exit mechanism in secretory epithelia (premolt digestive epithelium, postmolt cuticular hypodermis). Finally, it would be illuminating to study hormonal regulation of ECaC that is likely to involve both post-translational and transcriptional control mechanisms; possible candidate hormones in crustaceans are calcitonin, calcitonin gene-related peptide, vitamin D metabolites and ecdysterone (Flik et al., 1999).
Y. Gao and M. G. Wheatly
THE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
1823Cloning and characterization of crayfish EcaC
The authors thank Dr Steven Berberich of the Center for Genomics Research at Wright State University for expert technical advice in real-time PCR, and Dr Mariana Morris and Mary Key of the Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology at Wright State University for help with the in situ hybridization. This study was supported by the US National Science Foundation (Grants IBN 0076035 to M.G.W. and 0445202 to M.G.W. and Y.G.).
References Ahearn, G. A. and Franco, P. (1990). Sodium and calcium share the
electrogenic 2Na+-1H+ antiporter in crustacean antennal glands. Am. J. Physiol. 259, 758-767.
Ahearn, G. A. and Franco, P. (1993). Ca2+ transport pathways in brush- border membrane vesicles of crustacean antennal glands. Am. J. Physiol. 264, R1206-R1213.
Ahearn, G. A. and Zhuang, Z. (1996). Cellular mechanisms of calcium transport in crustaceans. Physiol. Zool. 69, 383-402.
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. and Lipman, D. J. (1990). Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403-410.
Birnbaumer, L., Zhu, X., Jiang, M., Boulay, G., Peyton, M., Vannier, B., Brown, D., Platano, D., Sadeghi, H., Stefani, E. et al. (1996). On the molecular basis and regulation of cellular capacitative calcium entry: roles for Trp proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 15195-15202.
Caterina, M. J., Schumacher, M. A., Tominaga, M., Rosen, T. A., Levine, J. D. and Julius, D. (1997). The capsaicin receptor: a heat-activated ion channel in the pain pathway. Nature 389, 816-824.
Caterina, M. J., Rosen, T. A., Tominaga, M., Brake, A. J. and Julius, D. (1999). A capsaicin-receptor homologue with a high threshold for noxious heat. Nature 398, 436-441.
Colbert, H. A., Smith, T. L. and Bargmann, C. I. (1997). OSM-9, a novel protein with structural similarity to channels, is required for olfaction, mechanosensation, and olfactory adaptation in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Neurosci. 17, 8259-8269.
Comhaire, S., Blust, R., VanGinneken, L., Verbost, P. and Vanderborght, O. (1998). Branchial cobalt uptake in the carp, Cyprinus carpio: effect of calcium channel blockers and calcium injection. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 18, 1-13.
Flik, G. and Verbost, P. M. (1993). Calcium transport in fish gills and intestine. J. Exp. Biol. 184, 17-29.
Flik, G., Van Der Velden, J. A., Dechering, K. J., Verbost, P. M., Schoenmakers, T. J. M., Kolar, Z. I. and Wendelaar-Bonga, S. E. (1993). Ca2+ and Mg2+ transport in gills and gut of tilapia Oreochromis mossambicus: a review. J. Exp. Zool. 265, 356-365.
Flik, G., Verbost, P. M., Atsma, W. and Lucu, C. (1994). Calcium transport in gill plasma membranes of the crab Carcinus maenas: evidence for carriers driven by ATP and a Na+ gradient. J. Exp. Biol. 195, 109-122.
Flik, G., Haond, C. and Lucu, C. (1999). Calcium regulation in invertebrates. In Calcium Metabolism: Comparative Endocrinology (ed. J. Danks, C. Dacke, G. Flik and C. Gay), pp. 3-12. Bristol: BioScientifica.
Fuller, E., Brown, H. and Bayer, C. (1989). Ultrastructure of the crayfish antennal gland revealed by scanning and transmission electron microscopy combined with ultrasonic microdissection. J. Morphol. 200, 9-15.
Gao, Y. and Wheatly, M. G. (2004). Characterization and expression of plasma membrane Ca2+ ATPase (PMCA3) in the crayfish Procambarus clarkii antennal gland during molting. J. Exp. Biol. 207, 2991-3002.
Hickman, C. P., Jr and Trump, B. F. (1969). The kidney. In Fish Physiology. Vol. 1 (ed. W. S. Hoar and D. J. Randall), pp. 91-239. New York: Academic.
Hoenderop, J. G. J., van der Kemp, A. W. C. M., Hartog, A., van de Graaf, S. F., van Os, C. H., Willems, P. H. G. M. and Bindels, R. J. M. (1999a). Molecular identification of the apical Ca2+ channel in 1, 25- dihydroxyvitamin D3-responsive epithelia. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 8375-8378.
Hoenderop, J. G. J., van der Kemp, A. W. C. M., Hartog, A., van Os, C. H., Willems, P. H. G. M. and Bindels, R. J. M. (1999b). The epithelial calcium channel, ECaC, is activated by hyperpolarization and regulated by cytosolic calcium. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 261, 488-492.
Hoenderop, J. G., Hartog, A., Stuiver, M., Doucet, A., Willems, P. H. and Bindels, R. J. (2000a). Localization of the epithelial Ca(2+) channel in rabbit kidney and intestine. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 11, 1171-1178.
Hoenderop, J. G. J., Willems, P. H. G. M. and Bindels, R. J. M. (2000b).
Toward a comprehensive molecular model of active calcium reabsorption. Am. J. Physiol. 278, F352-F360.
Hoenderop, J. G. J., Nilius, B. and Bindels, R. J. M. (2002a). Molecular mechanism of active Ca2+ reabsorption in the distal nephron. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 64, 529-549.
Hoenderop, J. G. J., Nilius, B. and Bindels, R. J. M. (2002b). ECaC: the gatekeeper of transepithelial Ca2+ transport. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1600, 6-11.
Kanzaki, M., Zhang, Y. Q., Mashima, H., Li, L., Shibata, H. and Kojima, I. (1999). Translocation of a calcium-permeable cation channel induced by insulin-like growth factor-I. Nat. Cell Biol. 1, 165-170.
Key, M., Wirick, B., Cool, D. and Morris, M. (2001). Quantitative in situ hybridization for peptide mRNAs in mouse brain. Brain Res. Brain Res. Protoc. 8, 8-15.
Kyte, J. and Doolittle, R. F. (1982). A simple method for displaying hydropathic character of a protein. J. Mol. Biol. 157, 105-132.
Larsson, T., Aksnes, L., Björnsson, B. T., Larsson, B., Lundgren, T. and Sundell, K. (2002). Antagonistic effects of 24R,25-dyhydroxyvitamin D3
and 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 on L-type Ca2+ channels and Na+/K+ exchange in enterocytes from Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua). J. Mol. Endocrinol. 28, 53-68.
Maluf, N. S. R. (1939). On the anatomy of the kidney of the crayfish and on the absorption of chloride from freshwater by this animal. Zool. Jahrb. Abt. Allg. Zool. 59, 515-534.
Montell, C., Birnbaumer, L., Flockerzi, V., Bindels, R. J., Bruford, E. A., Caterina, M. J., Clapham, D. E., Harteneck, C., Heller, S., Julius, D. et al. (2002). A unified nomenclature for the superfamily of TRP cation channels. Mol. Cell 9, 229-231.
Müller, D., Hoenderop, J. G. J., Meij, I. C., van den Heuvel, L. P. J., Knoers, N. V. A. M., den Hollander, A. I., Eggert, P., García-Nieto, V., Claverie-Martín, F. and Bindels, R. J. M. (2000a). Molecular cloning, tissue distribution, and chromosomal mapping of the human epithelial Ca2+
channel (ECAC1). Genomics 67, 48-53. Müller, D., Hoenderop, J. G. J., Merkx, G. F., van Os, C. H. and Bindels,
R. J. (2000b). Gene structure and chromosomal mapping of human epithelial calcium channel. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 275, 47-52.
Müller, D., Hoenderop, J. G. J., van Os, C. H. and Bindels, R. J. M. (2001). The epithelial calcium channel, ECaC1: molecular details of a novel player in renal calcium handling. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 16, 1329-1335.
Pan, T.-C., Liao, B.-K., Huang, C.-J., Lin, L.-Y. and Hwang, P.-P. (2005). Epithelial Ca2+ channel expression and Ca2+ uptake in developing zebrafish. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 289, R1202-R1211.
Peng, J.-B., Chen, X.-Z., Berger, U. V., Vassilev, P. M., Tsukaguchi, H., Brown, E. M. and Hediger, M. A. (1999). Molecular cloning and characterization of a channel-like transporter mediating intestinal calcium absorption. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 22739-22746.
Peng, J.-B., Chen, X.-Z., Berger, U. V., Weremowicz, S., Morton, C. C., Vassilev, P. M., Brown, E. M. and Hediger, M. A. (2000a). Human calcium transport protein CaT1. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 278, 326-332.
Peng, J.-B., Chen, X.-Z., Berger, U. V., Vassilev, P. M., Brown, E. M. and Hediger, M. A. (2000b). A rat kidney-specific calcium transporter in the distal nephron. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 28186-28194.
Peng, J.-B., Brown, E. M. and Hediger, M. A. (2001). Structural conservation of the genes encoding CaT1, CaT2, and related cation channels. Genomics 76, 99-109.
Peng, J.-B., Brown, E. M. and Hediger, M. A. (2003a). Apical entry channels in calcium-transporting epithelia. News Physiol. Sci. 18, 158-163.
Peng, J.-B., Brown, E. M. and Hediger, M. A. (2003b). Epithelial Ca2+ entry channels: transcellular Ca2+ transport and beyond. J. Physiol. 551, 729-740.
Perry, S. F. and Flik, G. (1988). Characterization of branchial transepithelial calcium fluxes in freshwater trout, Salmo gairdneri. Am. J. Physiol. 254, 491-498.
Perry, S., Shahsavarani, A., Georgalis, T., Bayaa, M., Furimsky, M. and Thomas, S. L. Y. (2003). Channels, pumps and exchangers in the gill and kidney of freshwater fishes: their role in ionic and acid-base regulation. J. Exp. Zool. 300, 53-62.
Peterson, D. R. and Loizzi, R. F. (1974a). Ultrastructure of the crayfish kidney-coelomosac, labyrinth, nephridial canal. J. Morphol. 142, 241-264.
Peterson, D. R. and Loizzi, R. F. (1974b). Biochemical and cytochemical investigations of (Na+-K+)-ATPase in the crayfish kidney. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 49A, 763-773.
Putney, J. W., Jr (2001). Pharmacology of capacitative calcium entry. Mol. Interv. 1, 84-94.
Qiu, A. and Hogstrand, C. (2004). Functional characterisation and genomic
THE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
1824
analysis of an epithelial calcium channel (ECaC) from pufferfish, Fugu rubripes. Gene 342, 113-123.
Shahsavarani, A., McNeill, B., Galvez, F., Wood, C. M., Goss, G. G., Hwang, P.-P. and Perry, S. F. (2006). Characterization of a branchial epithelial calcium channel (ECaC) in freshwater rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). J. Exp. Biol. 209, 1928-1943.
Song, Y., Peng, X., Porta, A., Takanaga, H., Peng, J. B., Hediger, M. A., Fleet, J. C. and Christakos, S. (2003). Calcium transporter 1 and epithelial calcium channel messenger ribonucleic acid are differentially regulated by 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D3 in the intestine and kidney of mice. Endocrinology 144, 3885-3894.
Stiner, L. M., Gao, Y. and Wheatly, M. G. (2004). Upregulation of NCX protein in hepatopancreas and antennal gland of freshwater crayfish associated with elevated Ca2+ flux. In Cell Volume and Signalling: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. Vol. 559 (ed. P. K. Lauf and N. C. Adragna), pp. 411-413. New York: Springer.
van Abel, M., Hoenderop, J. G. J., van der Kemp, A. W. C. M., van Leeuwen, J. P. T. M. and Bindels, R. J. M. (2003). Regulation of the epithelial Ca2+ channels in small intestine as studied by quantitative mRNA detection. Am. J. Physiol. 285, G78-G85.
van Cromphaut, S. J., Dewerchin, M., Hoenderop, J. G. J., Stockmans, I., van Herck, E., Kato, S., Bindels, R. J. M., Collen, D., Carmeliet, P., Bouillon, R. et al. (2001). Duodenal calcium absorption in vitamin D receptor-knockout mice: functional and molecular aspects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 13324-13329.
Weber, K., Erben, R. G., Rump, A. and Adamski, J. (2001). Gene structure and regulation of the murine epithelial calcium channels ECaC1 and 2. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 289, 1287-1294.
Wheatly, M. G. (1996). An overview of calcium balance in crustaceans. Physiol. Zool. 69, 351-382.
Wheatly, M. G. (1997). Crustacean models for studying calcium transport: the journey from whole organisms to molecular mechanisms. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 77, 107-125.
Wheatly, M. G. (1999). Calcium homeostasis in crustacea: the evolving role of branchial, renal, digestive and hypodermal epithelia. J. Exp. Zool. 283, 620-640.
Wheatly, M. G. and Toop, T. (1989). Physiological responses of the crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus (Dana) to environmental hyperoxia. II. The role of the antennal gland. J. Exp. Biol. 143, 53-70.
Wheatly, M. G., Pence, R. C. and Weil, J. R. (1999). ATP-dependent calcium uptake into basolateral vesicles from transporting epithelia of intermolt crayfish. Am. J. Physiol. 276, R566-R574.
Wheatly, M. G., Zanotto, F. P. and Hubbard, M. G. (2002). Calcium homeostasis in crustaceans: subcellular Ca dynamics. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 132B, 163-178.
Wheatly, M. G., Gao, Y. and Nade, M. (2004). Integrative aspects of renal epithelial calcium transport in crayfish: temporal and spatial regulation of PMCA. Int. Congr. Ser. 1275, 96-103.
Yu, A. S. L., Hebert, S. C., Brenner, B. M. and Lytton, J. (1992). Molecular characterization and nephron distribution of a family of transcripts encoding the pore-forming subunit of Ca2+ channels in the kidney. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 10494-10498.
Zanotto, F. P. and Wheatly, M. G. (2002). Calcium balance in crustaceans: nutritional aspects of physiological regulation. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 133A, 645-660.
Zhuang, L., Peng, J. B., Tou, L., Takanaga, H., Adam, R. M., Hediger, M. A. and Freeman, M. R. (2002). Calcium-selective ion channel, CaT1, is apically localized in gastrointestinal tract epithelia and is aberrantly expressed in human malignancies. Lab. Invest. 82, 1755-1764.
Zhuang, Z. and Ahearn, G. A. (1996). Ca2+ transport processes of lobster hepatopancreas brush border membrane vesicles. J. Exp. Biol. 199, 1195- 1208.
Zilli, L., Marsigliante, S., Zonno, V., Verri, T., Ahearn, G. A., Storelli, C. and Vilella, S. (2000). Identification of calcium channels in B cells of Penaeus japonicus hepatopancreas. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 126A, S154.
Y. Gao and M. G. Wheatly
THE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY