Module 2 Proposal of Research Method and Justification• Factors affecting Improvisation (Bailey,...

17
Postgraduate Certificate in Research Practice Module 2 Proposal of Research Method and Justification (Advisory Word Limit up to 3,500 words) Student Number 1 5 1 3 5 2 7 8 Student’s name: Percy Pursglove Faculty: ADM: Conservatoire, Composition Due date : 6 th May 2016 Declaration: I have read and understood the University’s guidance on plagiarism and cheating. By submitting this work, I confirm that this assignment is my own work and that it contains no unreferenced material from another source. I also confirm that I have kept an electronic copy of this assignment and will provide a copy to the University if required. I understand that I may be subject to disciplinary action if an allegation of academic misconduct is upheld in relation to this assessment. Student’s signature: Percy Pursglove First Assessor’s comments (see separate sheet for assessment criteria) Please indicate that separate or continuation sheet is attached if applicable ¨ Second Assessor’s comments (see separate sheet for assessment criteria) Please indicate that separate or continuation sheet is attached if applicable ¨ First Marker’s signature......................................................Date................................Mark……………… Second Marker’s signature…………………………………………………Date…………………………….Mark……………. The mark range is as follows: 0-49% denotes Fail or ‘Unsatisfactory’ standard 50-59% denotes Pass or ‘Satisfactory’ standard 60-69% denotes ‘Commendation’ standard 70-100% denotes ‘Distinction’ standard (see attached Assessment Criteria for band descriptors) *Note that mark may be moderated either up or down by the examination board Provisional mark awarded*

Transcript of Module 2 Proposal of Research Method and Justification• Factors affecting Improvisation (Bailey,...

Page 1: Module 2 Proposal of Research Method and Justification• Factors affecting Improvisation (Bailey, 1993/Berliner, 1994) – Psychological (Wilson, 2015), Psychoacoustical (Plack, 2005):

PostgraduateCertificateinResearchPractice

Module2ProposalofResearchMethodandJustification

(AdvisoryWordLimitupto3,500words)

StudentNumber 1 5 1 3 5 2 7 8

Student’sname: PercyPursglove

Faculty: ADM:Conservatoire,Composition

Duedate: 6thMay2016

Declaration:IhavereadandunderstoodtheUniversity’sguidanceonplagiarismandcheating.Bysubmittingthiswork,Iconfirmthatthisassignmentismyownworkandthatitcontainsnounreferencedmaterialfromanothersource.IalsoconfirmthatIhavekeptanelectroniccopyofthisassignmentandwillprovideacopytotheUniversityifrequired.IunderstandthatImaybesubjecttodisciplinaryactionifanallegationofacademicmisconductisupheldinrelationtothisassessment.

Student’ssignature:PercyPursglove

FirstAssessor’scomments(seeseparatesheetforassessmentcriteria)Pleaseindicatethatseparateorcontinuationsheetisattachedifapplicable¨SecondAssessor’scomments(seeseparatesheetforassessmentcriteria)Pleaseindicatethatseparateorcontinuationsheetisattachedifapplicable¨

FirstMarker’ssignature......................................................Date................................Mark………………

SecondMarker’ssignature…………………………………………………Date…………………………….Mark…………….

Themarkrangeisasfollows:0-49%denotesFailor‘Unsatisfactory’standard50-59%denotesPassor‘Satisfactory’standard60-69%denotes‘Commendation’standard70-100%denotes‘Distinction’standard(seeattachedAssessmentCriteriaforbanddescriptors)

*Notethatmarkmaybemoderatedeitherupordownbytheexaminationboard

Provisionalmark

awarded*

Page 2: Module 2 Proposal of Research Method and Justification• Factors affecting Improvisation (Bailey, 1993/Berliner, 1994) – Psychological (Wilson, 2015), Psychoacoustical (Plack, 2005):

2

PostgraduateCertificateinResearchPractice-Arts,DesignandMedia

PercyPursglove

Assignment2-ProposalofResearchMethodandJustification

ResearchTitle:

ExtendingChoralTradition:NewCompositionalLanguageforGeneratingImprovisationalFrameworks

ResearchChallenge

Thisresearchprojectwillengagewiththefollowingquestionsandchallenges:

• Discusstherelationshipbetweencompositionandimprovisation(Braxton,2007)

• Outlinetheinterdisciplinarycomplexitiesofthisproject

• Strategiseanapproachtonotationthatisinclusiveofmusicallytrainedandnon-trained

vocalparticipantsalike

• Howcan(andwhich)extendedvocaltechniques(Glassett,2011/Lee,2015)bestbeapplied

tomassedvoicecontexts?

• Howbestcanthechoralmusictraditioninformthegeneratingofnewcompositional

models?

• Whichcompositionalmechanismsbestcombinetypicalchoralforceswithanon-

conventionalNoiseChoirtoprovidenewimprovisationalframeworks?Therealisationof

onecompositionalconceptnestledwithinanother

• Discusshowhermeneutical,semiologicalandkinesicfactorsinfluencethecompositional

andimprovisationalprocess

Page 3: Module 2 Proposal of Research Method and Justification• Factors affecting Improvisation (Bailey, 1993/Berliner, 1994) – Psychological (Wilson, 2015), Psychoacoustical (Plack, 2005):

3

Aimsoftheresearch

Asaprojectthatstraddlesthetaxonomyofpractice-ledresearchandresearch-ledpractice,itisaxiomatic

that,alongsidetheformingofmyownexperimentalchoir,apreparatorycompositionalcollectionanda

detailedaccompanyingnarrative,theculminationofmyresearchwillresultinthecreationofa

compositionalportfoliotobeperformedinaconcertofnewmusic.Boththecompositionand

improvisationalprocesseswillbechannelledthroughthepracticalfindingsofmyresearchproject.

Therefore,theaimsofmyresearcharereflectiveofthiscurrentlyforecastedoutput:

o Generateanewcompositionalvocabularythatutiliseschoralframeworkstobroadentheinfluentialsphereanddisruptthepreparedauto-schediasticnarrativeoftheimproviser

o FormaNoiseChoir(09.2015)ofpredominantlynon-singersasaforuminwhichtoexperimentwithmassedextendedvocaltechniques(Crump,2008)

o Formaliseanotational(Black,1983)system/systemsforextendedvocaltechniquesthatareofoptimumclarityandaccessibilitytoalldisciplinesofmusiciansandnon-musicians

o Throughaseriesofpreparatorycompositionalstudyworks,identifysuccessfulandaccessiblecompositionaldevicesfromtheparticipantperspective.Identify,fromaself-reflexivestandpoint,thosegenerativedevicesmostinfluentialtotheimproviser

o Throughaseriesofcompositionalworks,examineanumberofpossibleaccompanyingensembleconfigurationsthatbestframethenewlyformalisedvocalcompositionalstrategies,andprovidestableframeworksforimprovisation

o Ateachstageofcompositionalresearchandperformativeexplorations,writeandseektopublishdetailedaccountsoffindings

o Composeandperformaconcertofnewmusicemergingfromandinformedbypracticalresearch

Articulationofthescopeoftheresearchproject

Thisresearchprojectispivotalininformingprogressivebi-partisangenerativecompositionaltechniques

thatdirectlyengagewiththeprocessofimprovisation.Itsmotivationliesintheinterdisciplinaryconjoining

offixedcompositionalstructures(specificallythoseofmassedvoices)alongsidethepreparedauto-

schediasmoftheimprovisationlineage.Thoughconsiderableresearchhasdelvedintoflowstate

(Csikszentmihalyi,2014),empathicintelligence(Arnold,2005/Bresler,2006:36)andpsychological

processesthatoccurduringimprovisationalpractices(Bailey,1993/Wilson,2015/Plack,2005),thisstudyis

approachedfromthepositionofjazzcomposer/performer/researcher.Thisuniquetri-alityoffersanew

perspectiveintacklingnotonlytechnicalperformativeaspectsofcompositionandimprovisation,but

Page 4: Module 2 Proposal of Research Method and Justification• Factors affecting Improvisation (Bailey, 1993/Berliner, 1994) – Psychological (Wilson, 2015), Psychoacoustical (Plack, 2005):

4

vitally;thatofgatheringknowledgefromthestandpointoftheoreticalframeworksincluding:empirical,

‘[…]reflectivepractice,participantobservation,performanceethnography,ethnodrama,

biographical/autobiographical/narrativeenquiryandtheenquirycyclefromactionresearch.’(Haseman,

2006).Thebreadthofthisstudywillspanthechoraltraditiontothepresentday,improvisationalconcepts:

harmonicallyderivedlinearconstructionmethods;extendedtechniques;conduction,notationsystemsand

anexaminationoffindingsthroughabricolageoftheoreticalconceptions.Thisassignmentwillgeneratea

numberofcompositionalartefactsinformedinsymbiosisbyimprovisationalmethodsandinterrogatedby

phenomenologicallyanalysedfindingsthroughanaccompanyingnarrative.Althoughthisisaprojectthatis

focusedonthecreationofnewlyformalisedmusicalmaterials,myresearchmethodswillbelimitedtothe

performativeaspectsofmusicmakinganditsmusicmakersi.e.theperspectiveandexperiencesof

improvisersandchoralparticipants,andnotthoseofthelistener.

Researchcontext

Myareaofresearchisconcernedwithcreatingachoralcompositionallanguageandportfolioofnewwork

shapedindirectionandconceptbythekeyelementofimprovisingwithinnewlyformalisedcompositional

settings.Thoughthereisaconsiderablebodyofworktobuilduponfromthechoraltraditionandalimited

stockofchoralcollaborationsthroughthejazzlineage,thereisadeficitofknowledgeinthedevelopment

ofcompositionaltoolstoenableframeworksformusicalassociationswithimprovisers.

Thismulti-facetedchallengefocussesonthelittleexploredphenomenonofemployingcompositional

devicestoinvokeimprovisationalresponsestomomentsofmusicalindeterminacy,specificallywithinthe

contextofmassedvoices.Thisphenomenoninturncreatesafurtherepiphenomenal(James,2000:128)

outcomeforimproviserswithinthesenewlycreatedtextures.Whilethereissomeacademicdiscussionof

theuseoffracturedcompositionalprocessessuchasaleatorytechniqueswithinthechoraltradition

(Galbreath,2015),myposition,asoutlinedinmyliteraryreview,isthatthespecificityofsuchstructural

compositionaldevicesdoesnotalignwiththetacitmanifestoofimprovisation,whichseesimprovisationas

an‘escapefromtherigidity’(Bailey,1993:84)andformalisationofthesenotatedmethods.

Aconsistentthreadthroughoutthischallengeisareconciliationofdivergentconcepts,acuriousamalgam

oftraditionandcontemporaneity,fixedandindeterminatecompositionaltoolsandtheinterrelated

intertextualityyetopposingcampsofcompositionandimprovisation.Afurtherstrandofconsiderationis

thatofpost-autonomy(Jauss,1972:39),whichdealswiththecollaborativenatureofparticipatorypractice

(Goldenberg,2012).Essentially,thismeanstheimpetusthattheinclusionofnon-professional/non-first

studyvocalparticipantsbringtomassedvocalcontexts.

Page 5: Module 2 Proposal of Research Method and Justification• Factors affecting Improvisation (Bailey, 1993/Berliner, 1994) – Psychological (Wilson, 2015), Psychoacoustical (Plack, 2005):

5

Thetopographyofmyfieldofstudyis,bynecessity,relativelybroad.Underitssurfaceliesa

multidimensional,multifacetedsphereofconsideration.Asaprojectthatishingedaroundpraxis,‘theory

imbricatedwithinpractice’(Nelson,2013:40),itispertinenttocontextualisemyspecialismbyconsidering

issuesconcerningbothpracticalandtheoreticalframeworks.

Thisfieldofstudyissituatedbetweenthedisciplinesofcontemporaryclassicalmusicandjazz,between

compositionandimprovisationandbetweenresearchandpractice.Thisplacesmeinanidealpositionto

addresstheissuesoutlinedinmyprojectaims.Tofocusmyresearchandenablearealandvaluable

contributiontoknowledgeitisimportanttoexplorefullytheextantliteratureconcerningmyparticular

arenaofspecialism.Theseareasinclude:

• Extanttraditionalchoralcompositionalworksandtheirintegralcompositionaltechniques:

Assimilateagroundingintraditionalchoralcompositionandidentifypotentialityof

transferableexistingcompositionaltoolstoimprovisationalcontexts.

• Extantcompositionalworksassociatedwiththejazzcanonutilisingchoralforces:

Identifyandextractexistingmomentsofintertextualitydesignedbyjazzexponents

specificallywithimprovisationalcollaborationinmind.

• Hermeneutics(Heidegger,1927)–notational/semiotical(Nattiez,1990/Dunsby,1983)

considerations:

Methodologicalframeworksfortheinterpretationoftextandsymbols.Directlyapplicable

tovariousstrandsofthisproject:notation,chordsymbols,graphicscoresandthesettingof

texts.

• Performativefactorsofmusicalcommunication–EmbodiedNarrative(Bresler,2006),

EmpathicIntelligence(Arnold,2005),Kinesics(Birdwhistell,1970),Conduction(Stanley,

2009):

ThePerformativeelementsofmusic-makingandthephenomenologicalthreadsof

communicationthatoccurduringtheperformancepracticeprocess.

• Extendedvocaltechniques:EVT’s(Kavash,2015):

Extendedperformancepractices,specificallyEVT’s.Theimpactthispracticecanhaveon

thedevelopmentofimprovisationalframeworkswhenappliedinmassedcontextsanda

Page 6: Module 2 Proposal of Research Method and Justification• Factors affecting Improvisation (Bailey, 1993/Berliner, 1994) – Psychological (Wilson, 2015), Psychoacoustical (Plack, 2005):

6

studyintotheaccessibilityofEVT’stonon-musicians/non-firststudymusicians.Anin-depth

knowledgeoftheinternationalphoneticalphabet(IPA)willinformthisfurther.

• FactorsaffectingImprovisation(Bailey,1993/Berliner,1994)–Psychological(Wilson,2015),

Psychoacoustical(Plack,2005):

Afocusontheactofimprovisationandthefactorsthataffectit,bothfromapsychological

perspective,andspecificallytheeffectthatperceptionofsoundhasontheimprovisational

narrative.

• Phenomenology(Husserl,1900)

Thiscornerofphilosophyisaqualitativeresearchmethodologyconcernedwiththereal

experiencesandconsciousnessofindividuals,inthecaseofthisresearchprojectitwillaid

intheself-reflexivityelementtothisproject.

• Empiricism(Hume,1739)

Thephilosophicaltheorybasedonknowledgederivedfromsensoryexperiences.

Methodology

Thisresearchassignmentisagenre-spanning,multi-dimensional,multi-faceted,cross-disciplinaryproject,

andassuchrequiresthemethodologicalnettobecastwide.Thisbroadmethodologysectionreflectsthe

necessitiesoftheproject.

Asmyexplorationintoresearch-ledpractice/practice-ledresearchprogresses,itbecomesclearerthatthe

uniquenessofmyresearchliesintheinterlockingofthreecorefundamentals:Composition;Writing;

Performance.Eachcomponentinformsthenextstageofitsowndevelopmentandthatofitsneighbour.

Thinkingofthissymbiosisasatri-alityofdivergentyetinterrelatedelementsgivesriseandcauseto

adoptingamultimethodologicalsystemdescribedbyJacquelineTaylorasa‘self-reflexivebricolage’:

‘[…]amixtureofstrategiesthatoverlap,intersectandinterweavewithoneanother.Thisapproach

drawsonthenotionoftheartist-researcherasa‘bricoleur’whoadoptsamulti-methodor

polyvalentapproachtoartpracticeresearch.’(Taylor,2013)

Thismultivalencelayeringofconceptuallyrelevantmaterialsandtheoriescontinuouslyinformingthe

progressionofresearchisbynomeansanewconcept.Bourdieu’sOutlineofaTheoryofPractice(1977)

Page 7: Module 2 Proposal of Research Method and Justification• Factors affecting Improvisation (Bailey, 1993/Berliner, 1994) – Psychological (Wilson, 2015), Psychoacoustical (Plack, 2005):

7

setsoutaclearvisualisationofthisasaperpetuallyspirallingaccretionofknowledgeandtheory,however,

foraresearchprojectsuchasmine,thistwo-dimensionalmethodologicalphilosophycanbebroadened

furthertoopenathirdstreamofPerformativeResearch(Haseman,2006).

Withtheadditionofempiricism(Hume,1739),theOutlineofaTheoryofPracticeoffersastrong

underpinningtothedevelopmentofarobustmethodologicalframeworkhereindefinedasheterosisof

methodologies.Referredtoinsomecasesashybrid-vigour,heterosisisaphraseassimilatedfromscientific

circlesmeaningfortificationthroughhybridisation.Placedbeyondquantitativeandqualitativeresearch

methodologybyHaseman(2006:6),itispositedasPerformativeResearch,‘[a]multi-methodledby

research’.Theeternalself-informativecircularity,whichhasbeenatheoreticalstapleandstable

methodologicalbuildingblockinresearch,issomethingthatissometimesfearedbycreativepractitioners:

‘Creativepractitionershavesometimesarguedthattheorisationordocumentationofthecreative

processriskssubduingthecreativefireorreducingtherangeofresponsestotheirwork.’(Smith

andDean,2011:25)

Thecreativeprocesscanbefuelledanddrivenbymethodicallyconsideredpreparatoryprocesses.Iecho

SmithandDean’spositionoutlinedinPractice-ledResearch,Research-ledPracticeintheCreativeArts

(2011:25)thatinstantaneousuninformedcreationisamythperpetuatedbythoseromanticisingaboutthe

notionofthecreativegenius.Innovationishardwon,requiring:strategy;reflection;manifesto;critical

opinion;criticism;communityand,aboveallelse,acreative,clearandconciserepresentationofideas

focussedthroughthelensofourindividualrealities.

Fromanepistemologicalstance,constructivism(Piaget,1926)offersatheoreticalstreamfromwhichIcan

drawmeaninginformedbytheinteractionwithmyexperiences,inthiscasetheperformativesideof

research,andideasdrawnfromtheoreticalandreflexivestagesofwritingandanalysis.

‘Constructivismisapost-structuralistpsychologicaltheory[…]onethatconstrueslearningasan

interpretive,recursive,non-linearbuildingprocessbyactivelearnersinteractingwiththeir

surround.’(Fosnot,Perry,2005)

Conversationalcross-examinationbetweenoutputsbothcreativeandacademicofferthesurroundingand

buildingblockstodevelopandformastrongresearchassignment.AsAnthonyBraxton(2007)highlights,

compositionandimprovisationarecloselyrelatedpracticesthataremutuallyinformative.Hediscussesthe

relationshipofthesetwopractices,andatheoreticaloppositionofwhathasbecometraditionalinthejazz

lineage:improvisationoccursaftermelodicmaterial.Braxton’spositionisthatimprovisational

performativepracticesleadtoformulasoffixedcompositionalpotentialitiesbeyond.Atfirst,thisconcept

Page 8: Module 2 Proposal of Research Method and Justification• Factors affecting Improvisation (Bailey, 1993/Berliner, 1994) – Psychological (Wilson, 2015), Psychoacoustical (Plack, 2005):

8

ledmetosearchforthelineofseparationbetweenthetwocamps,however,Inowseethatthetwoare

notmutuallyexclusive,andforme,theunderstandingofthistheoryisparamountinthefunctional

developmentofthisproject.Johnston(2015)furtherelucidatesthismatterinhispaper:Constructivism:

TheoristsandtheirTheories:

‘Theconceptofrelationshipofviableorganismsadaptingtotheirenvironmentprovideameansto

reconstructtherelationshipbetweenthecognitivesubjects’conceptualframeworkandthat

subject’sexperimentalworld.’(Johnston,2015)

Tocontextualisethiswithinmyownresearchframework,eachcoreelementof:

Composition/Performance/Writingistobeconstantlyadaptedandreconstructedasareflectionofthe

evolvinglandscape.Astheenvironmentshifts,sointurndoesthefocusofresearch.Therecursivenature

ofthistrioofcoreelementsmeansthateachcompositionandperformativeresearchexperienceleadsto,

anddemandsawrittenresponse,which,inturnquestionsthepreviouscompositionalstancerequiring

furthercompositionalandperformativeinterrogationofnewthefindings.Thisisclearlysetoutin

Costello’s(2003:8)ActionResearchdiagram:

Action Research

Rgure 1.2 An extended action research model.

research can often involve undertaking a single cycle ofplanning, acting, observing and reflecting, it can alsolead to more lengthy and substantial studies within edu-cational settings.

These may be projects that are undertaken as part ofstudy for a research degree, or funded research projectswhere the timescale and scope of the research extendbeyond what is normally possible to teachers conductingsmall-scale classroom-based research. If you wish to com-plete an action research thesis for an MPhil. or PhD, anumber of general and specific texts will be helpful (see,for example, Cryer, 2000; Dick, 1993, 2000; Phillips andPugh, 1987; Salmon, 1992).

A more elaborate action research model is offered byMichael Bassey, whose framework consists of eight stageswhich may be summarized as follow (see Bassey, 1998, pp.94-5 and Robson, 2002, pp. 217-18):

Stage 1: Defining the enquiry.Stage 2: Describing the educational situation.

8

Page 9: Module 2 Proposal of Research Method and Justification• Factors affecting Improvisation (Bailey, 1993/Berliner, 1994) – Psychological (Wilson, 2015), Psychoacoustical (Plack, 2005):

9

Johnstoncontinues:

‘[…]Piagetconceptualisedtheinterplaybetweenindividual’scognitivestructureandthe

knowledgeacquiredfromthesocialworldaspartofanopensystem.Knowledgeandmindare

inseparablebecauseoneaffectstheother.Botharebeingdevelopedfromadialecticalinteraction

betweenthesubjectandtheworldaroundhimorher,includingthesocialworld.’(Johnston,2015)

Thissentimentisindirectalignmentnotonlywiththeneedtocommunicatewiththesocialworldinthe

senseoftheresearchcommunityandthatofqualitativeresearchsubjects,butalsowiththesocialworldas

ametaphorintheperformativesense.One’ssocialworldisanyinteractionalenvironment.Inthecaseof

myresearchsubject,itintersectswithrealmusical/compositionaloutputsandperformativeresearch

experiences.Johnstoncontinuesbyofferingagraphicrepresentationofthisconceptwhichisdescribedas

‘[…]adialecticaltripartitedrawing’:

Fig.1:DialecticalTripartiteDrawing(Johnston,2015)

ThisDeleuzianrhizomaticsketchclearlyrepresentstheconstructivistmodelofsolipsistic/intersubjective

interactivity.Withfurtherspecificityinmind,asimilarmodelcanbeadoptedtoconceptualisemyown

researchproject:

SELF

SYMBOL

OTHERS MEDIUM

Page 10: Module 2 Proposal of Research Method and Justification• Factors affecting Improvisation (Bailey, 1993/Berliner, 1994) – Psychological (Wilson, 2015), Psychoacoustical (Plack, 2005):

10

Fig.2:Myowndiagramtoillustrate:AHeterosisofMethodologies

Thisheterosisofmethodologies,asapractice-basedprojectthathasitsgazefirmlyfixedongeneratingart,

isdesignedtobeanaestheticinquiryaswellasamethodforgatheringintelligence.Akeycontributorto

thisheterosisofmethodologiesnestledwithinpost-autonomyisparticipationpractice.Theprocessof

engagingparticipants:non-trainedmusiciansandnon-firststudysingersintheactofmusicmakingin

massedvocalcontextsnotonlyoffersaninevitableactionresearchangle,particularlythatofparticipant

observation,butinterestinglygivesnewdirectiontothepotentialityoftheartwork.

‘CriticaltoPost-Autonomyisparticipationasamethodology,whichoperatesasacommunicative

gluewithintheartsystem,breakingdownorthodoxcategoriesandhierarchiesofartist,curator,

institution,andaudience.’(Goldenberg,2007/8)

Post-autonomy(Jauss,1977),originallyaresponsetoBarthes(1967)LaMortdel’auteurorDeathofthe

Authorfocussesontheinteractionbetweentextandreaderunderthenotionofreceptiontheory.Bythe

sametoken,theideaofparticipationpracticeinpost-autonomoustermsempowersparticipants,inthe

caseofmyresearch:performingmembersofchoralworksutilisingnewlyformalisedcompositionaldevices,

offeringthemtheimpetustoshapeanddirecttheartwork,orimprovisationalframeworks.Theultimate

aimisthatthehierarchicalclassificationsofcomposer,performerandimproviserarelevelledtoallow

universalaccessibilitythroughcompositionalandnotationalinnovations.

Asatheorydrillingdownintotheinterpretationoftext,Hermeneuticsishighlyrelevantwhendealingwith

thedevelopmentofmusicalnotationsystems.Focusingontheadvancementofsystemsthathavethis

AHeterosisofMethodologies:

Research-ledPracticeInforming

Practice-led Reseach

PerformativeResearch

Constructivism

CompositionalOutput

EmpircismPhenomenology

Epiphenomenology

SelfReflexivity

Hermeneutics/Semiology

AcademicWriting

PostAutonomousParticipatoryPractice

Page 11: Module 2 Proposal of Research Method and Justification• Factors affecting Improvisation (Bailey, 1993/Berliner, 1994) – Psychological (Wilson, 2015), Psychoacoustical (Plack, 2005):

11

universalaccessibility,Iinterprettheword‘text’asspanningdisciplinesandgivingvaliditytostandardised

musicalnotation,extendedvocaltechniquenotationandgraphicscores.However,therealinterestinthis

methodologyliesintheinterpretationofthese‘texts’andthegenerativeconstructivistinterpretationof

thoseinterpretations.Schwandtpositsthisconcept:

‘ForHeideggerandGadamer,thecircularityofinterpretationisnotsimplyamethodologicalprocessor

condition,butalsoanessentialfeatureofallknowledgeandunderstanding[…].’(Schwandt,2001)

Here,Schwandthighlightscyclicalperpetuityofinterpretationandconsideration.Inthiscaserelatingto

text,butinacompositionalsense,broadlyapplicabletopitch,graphicscoresandadvancedmusical

notationschemes.

Althoughthismethodologysectionisbroadinitssphereofconsideration,mytacklingthisprojectfromthe

standpointofaheterosisofmethodologiesmeansthatthesechosenconceptscanbealignedinawaythat

ismutuallycomplementary,givingtheassignmentthenecessaryimpetusandforwardmotiontobea

successfulandthoroughinterrogationofmychosenspecialism.

Outcomes

Thispractice-basedprojectwillgenerateanumberofartefactsinvariousformsofcompositional

preparations,compositionalportfoliosandaglossaryofnewlyformedcompositionaldevicesandtools.

Giventheparticipatorypracticeslantofthisproject,itispertinentformyresearchtoincludeAction

Research(Lewin,1946)alongsidetheself-reflexivephenomenological/empiricalconsiderations.This

reflexiveandactionresearchdatawillbecollected,documentedandanalysedduringtheresearchprocess.

Artefacts:

o Creationandanalysisoftwocompositionalportfolios:Onepreparatorycompositionalcollection,

andoneportfolioofconcertlengthtobeperformedandrecordedforarchivalpurposes.

o Aformalisedlexiconandanalysisofcompositionaltechniquesdevelopedforcollaborationsof

improvisersandchoralforces:bothmusicianandnon-musicianparticipants.

o Accompanyingdocumentationof15,000–30,000wordsoftextualanalysisandcriticalreflection

outliningmyresearchprocessandfindingsateachstage,andhowthesefindingshaveinformed

thedirectionofmyresearch.

Page 12: Module 2 Proposal of Research Method and Justification• Factors affecting Improvisation (Bailey, 1993/Berliner, 1994) – Psychological (Wilson, 2015), Psychoacoustical (Plack, 2005):

12

Thefindingsofthisresearchprojectwillberelevanttoavarietyoffieldsofstudyandtheirrespective

debates:

• Composition:interdisciplinarycollaboration,notation,massedextendedtechnique

• Improvisation:newimprovisationalframeworks,psychoacoustics,psychology,kinesics,

conduction,preparedauto-schediasm

• Musicalmethodsofcommunication:inthemomentempathicresponse

ResearchTimetable

• 09.2015–05.2016

PGCert.

Examinationofextantliterature/scores:Identifyandextractrelevantcompositional

devices/toolsapplicableandtransferabletoimprovisationalframeworks.

ExamineMethodologicalFrameworks.

TheoreticalModelling.

Criticalreflectiontodirectnextcourseofstudy.

• 09.2015–09.2021

TutoringandSupervision.

Formchoirofnon-singers:participationobservation/developmentalexperimentation.

Continualcompositionaloutputinformativeandreflectiveofresearch.

Collateresponses.

Analyseresponses.

Criticalreflectiontodirectnextcourseofstudy.

• 09.2015–05.2016

Composeandperformanumberofworksfocusingonboththeinterdisciplinarynatureof

myresearchprojectandtheparticipatoryelement.ContextualisefindingsoftheNoise

Choirwithinconventionalchoralsettings.Piecesforvoicesandimproviserperformedat

theFrontiersfestival,CoMA/BCGMfestival,TheSpottedDog(participatorywork).

Criticalreflectiontodirectnextcourseofstudy.Criticalreflectiontodirectnextcourseof

study.

Page 13: Module 2 Proposal of Research Method and Justification• Factors affecting Improvisation (Bailey, 1993/Berliner, 1994) – Psychological (Wilson, 2015), Psychoacoustical (Plack, 2005):

13

• 09.2015–05.2016

Contextualisedmassedextendedvocaltechniquesforsingersandnon-singerspecialists

withinanensembleconfiguration.AGlancetotheSkytoCounttheStars,commissionedby

ConservatoireJuniorDepartmentforOrchestra,ChoirandJazzEnsemble.Tobepremiered

25.06.2016.

Criticalreflectiontodirectnextcourseofstudy.

• 04.2016–11.2016

Applycompositionalfindingswithinasmallensembleof4singersand2improvisers.

TenderButtons:commissionedbyHuddersfieldContemporaryMusicFestival,tobe

premiered11.2016withThomasStronen.

Criticalreflectiontodirectnextcourseofstudy.

• 09.2016–09.2017

Preparatorycompositionalexperimentationfocussedonframingvoiceswithvarying

ensembleconfigurations.

Formalisationandcollationofmassedextendedvocaltechniques.

Criticalreflectiontodirectnextcourseofstudy.

• 09.2017–09.2018

Formalisationofuniversalnotationsystem.

Criticalreflectiontodirectnextcourseofstudy.

• 09.2020–09.2021

Accompanyingnarrativewriteup.

Criticalreflectiontodirectnextcourseofstudy.

• 06.2021–09.2021

Writeconclusionandrecommendations.

Submit.

Page 14: Module 2 Proposal of Research Method and Justification• Factors affecting Improvisation (Bailey, 1993/Berliner, 1994) – Psychological (Wilson, 2015), Psychoacoustical (Plack, 2005):

14

EthicalConsiderations

Whilethisaprojectthatispredominantlyself-reflexiveandfocussedonthecreationofcompositional

artefacts,duetoitsinherentneedforcollaborationwithbothparticipantsandmusiciansitisvitalto

considertheethicalpositionofthisresearchprojectinalignmentwiththeUniversity’sethicalcode.

Ethicalconsiderationsforthisprojectinclude:

o Integrityinthehonestandaccuratereportingofdatafindings

o Theacknowledgementofallsourcesandinformantsbothprimaryandsecondary

o Myrolewithintheuniversityasasupervisor/lectureranditsrelationshiptoparticipants

o Considerationofanypotentialphysicalorpsychologicalharmandsensitivitytherequirementsand

expectationsofeachparticipant

o Freeandinformedconsent:clear,welldefinedandoutlinedconsentformshighlightingwhat,how,

whenandwhyIintendtoundertakemychosenresearch

o ParticipantConsentinrelationto:participantresearch,informedconsent,documentingconsent,

protectionofprivacy:anonymity/confidentiality

o Paymentofparticipantsif/whenrequired

o Informationdissemination:intellectualownership,managementofgathereddata,personal

information/contactdetails,accesstogathereddataandthelengthoftimeitiskept

[Maintext:c.3,500words]

Page 15: Module 2 Proposal of Research Method and Justification• Factors affecting Improvisation (Bailey, 1993/Berliner, 1994) – Psychological (Wilson, 2015), Psychoacoustical (Plack, 2005):

15

References

Arnold,Roslyn,2005.EmpathicIntelligence.SydneyAustralia:UniversityofSouthWalesPress.

Bailey,Derek.1993.Improvisation:ItsNatureandpracticeinMusic.SecondEdition.Massachusetts:Da

CapoPress.

Barthes,Roland,1967.LaMortdel’auteur.[onlineresource]Availableat:

<http://www.ubu.com/aspen/aspen5and6/threeEssays.html#barthes>[Accessed12March2016].

Berliner,P.,1994ThinkinginJazz:TheInfiniteArtofImprovisation.Ed.byP.Bohlman,B.Nettl.Chicago:

UniversityofChicagoPress.

Birdwhistell,Ray,L.,1970.KinesicsandContext:EssaysonBodyMotionCommunication.Philadelphia:

UniversityofPennsylvaniaPress.

Black,Robert,1983–1984.ContemporaryNotationandPerformancePractice:ThreeDifficulties

PerspectivesofNewMusic,22(1–2),117–146.

Booth,WayneC.,Colomb,GregoryG.,Williams,JosephM.,2008.TheCraftofResearch,ThirdEdition.

ChicagoPress.

Bourdieu,Pierre,1977.OutlineofaTheoryofPractice.Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress.

Braxton,Anthony,2008.AnthonyBraxtonKeynoteAddressattheGuelphFestival,2007.CriticalStudiesin

Improvisation,4(1).

Bresler,Liora,2006.EmbodiedNarrativeInquiry:AMethodologyofConnection.ResearchStudiesinMusic

Education,27,21–43.

Costello,PatrickJ.M.,2003,ActionResearch.London:A&CBlack.

Crump,MelanieAustin,2008,WhenWordsAreNotEnough:TracingtheDevelopmentofExtendedVocal

TechniquesinTwentieth-CenturyAmerica.D.M.A.UniversityofNorthCarolina.

Csikszentmihalyi,Mihaly,2014,FlowandtheFoundationsofPositivePsychology:TheCollectedWorksof

MihalyCsikszentmihalyi.Netherlands:Springer.

Dunsby,Jonathan,1983.MusicandSemiotics:TheNattiezPhase.TheMusicalQuarterly.69(1),27–43.

Page 16: Module 2 Proposal of Research Method and Justification• Factors affecting Improvisation (Bailey, 1993/Berliner, 1994) – Psychological (Wilson, 2015), Psychoacoustical (Plack, 2005):

16

Fosnot,CatherineTwomey,2005.Constrctivism:Theory,PerspectiveandPractice.NewYork:Teachers

CollegePress.

Galbreath,Daniel,2015.Texture,Aleatorism,andMeaninginPostmodernChoralMusic(1963–1976).MUS-

7026DissertationBirminghamCityUniversity.

GlassettMurdoch,Margot,2011.ComposingwithVocalPhysiology:ExtendedVocalTechniqueCategories

andBerios’sSequenzaIII.D.M.A.TheUniversityofUtah.

Goldenberg,David,2008.WhatisParticipatoryPractice[onlineresource]Availableat:

<http://fillip.ca/content/what-is-a-participatory-practice>[Accessed10February2016].

Goldenberg,David,2012.AShortHistoryofPostAutonomy.[onlineresource]Availableat:

<http://www.postautonomy.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/shorthistorysmall.pdf>[Accessed20

November2015].

Haseman,Brad,2006.AManifestoforPerformativeResearch.MediaInternationalAustraliaincorporating

CultureandPolicy,themeissue“Practice-ledResearch”,118,98–106.

Heidegger,Martin,1927.SeinUndZeit.Germany:MaxNiemeyerVerlagTubingen.

Hume,David,1896[1739].ATreatiseofHumanNature.Oxford:OxfordClarendonPress.

Husserl,Edmund,2001[1900].LogicalInvestigations.London:Routledge.

James,William,2000.ThePrinciplesofPsychology.NewYork:DoverPress.

Kavash,Deborah,AnIntroductiontoExtendedVocalTechniques:SomeCompositionalAspectsand

PerformanceProblems,[onlineresource]Availableat:<http://www.ex-tempore.org/kavash/kavash.htm>

[Accessed16October2015].

Kuchler,LelandF.,1973.MusiqueConcrèteandAleatory–TwoWaystoRecaptureInterest.Music

Educators’Journal,59(6),42–44.

Lee,Joanna,2015.ExtendedVocalTechniquesandNotation.Dissertation,BirminghamCityUniversity.

Leister,Blake,AListofChoralWorksthatEmployAleatoricTechniques,[onlineresource]Availableat:

<http://www.choralnet.org/view/221758>[Accessed4November2015].

Lewin,Kurt.1946.ActionResearchandMinorityProblems.JournalofSocialIssues,2(4),34–46.

Page 17: Module 2 Proposal of Research Method and Justification• Factors affecting Improvisation (Bailey, 1993/Berliner, 1994) – Psychological (Wilson, 2015), Psychoacoustical (Plack, 2005):

17

Nattiez,Jean-Jacques,1990.MusicandDiscourse:TowardsaSemiologyofMusic.NewJersey:Princeton

Paperbacks.

Nelson,Brandon,2015.ExtendedCompositionTechniquesforChoir[onlineresource]Availableat:

<https://bnelsonmusic.wordpress.com/2012/04/23/extended-composition-techniques-for-choir>

[Accessed2November2015].

Nelson,Robin,2013.PracticeasResearchintheArts:Principles,Protocols,Pedagogies,Resistances.

London:PalgraveMacmillan.

Piaget,Jean,1926.TheLanguageandThoughtoftheChild.London:Routledge&KeganPaul.

Plack,ChristopherJ.,2005.TheSenseofHearing.London:Routledge.

Schwandt,ThomasA.,2001.DictionaryofQualitativeInquiry:SecondEdition.SAGEPublications.

Stanley,Thomas,2009.ButchMorrisandtheArtofConduction,D.M.A.diss.UniversityofMaryland.

Smith,Hazel,RogerDean,2011.Practice-ledResearch,Research-ledPracticeintheCreativeArts.

Edinburgh:EdinburghUniversityPress.

Taylor,Jacqueline,2013.Writing//Painting;l’écriturefeminineanddifferenceinthemaking.PhD

dissertation,BirminghamCityUniversity.

VarietiesofEnglish,InternationalPhoneticAlphabet[onlineresource]Availableat:<http://ic-

migration.webhost.uits.arizona.edu/icfiles/ic/lsp/site/IPA.html>[Accessed12November2015].

Wilson,GrahamB.,RaymondA.R.MacDonald,2015.MusicalChoicesduringGroupFreeImprovisation:A

QualitativePsychologicalInvestigation.Sempre,PsychologyofMusic,34(2),1–15.