Models of evalaution in educational technology

8

Click here to load reader

Transcript of Models of evalaution in educational technology

Page 1: Models of evalaution in educational technology

Done by: Bader Al-Wardi 68709 Sluiman Al-Subihi 68703Submitted to: Dr. Alaa Sadik

Models of evaluation in educational technology

Page 2: Models of evalaution in educational technology

Study Title: USING KIRKPATRICK’S FOUR-LEVEL-EVALUATION MODELTO EXPLORE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF COLLABORATIVE ONLINE GROUP WORK.

Author: Colin Baskin Teaching and Learning Development Unit James Cook University, Australia

Models of evaluation in educational technology

Page 3: Models of evalaution in educational technology

Introduction of the Study:the Study examines two cohorts of students. One cohort of 90

students completed a real time learning program integrating group dynamics and participative decision-making and the

second cohort of 171 students completed the same course of study in an online environment.

The Goal of Study: to explore student-learning outcomes related to online group work by using Kirkpatrick model.

The models used:using a four level evaluation of learning model (Kirkpatrick, 1996) to explore student-learning outcomes related to online group work.

Models of evaluation in educational technology

Page 4: Models of evalaution in educational technology

The Findings of the Study:1- the real time student sample recorded a significantly higher satisfaction rating in some aspects of their group learning experiences than their online counterparts.

2- the online group work model successfully supports group learning behaviors, transfer of these behaviors to practice, and

improvement in learner behaviors at the enterprise level.

 

Models of evaluation in educational technology

Page 5: Models of evalaution in educational technology

Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Model (1975).

Level one: Reaction1- Students in both cohorts were asked to respond to six

statements related to their understanding of the group work process and their perception of their peers.

2- Responses were rated on a five point scale ranging from 1 = strongly agree to 5 = strongly disagree.

Its Findings:The overall satisfaction level of both cohorts of students (Mean = 1.88). indicates that students in both the real time and online group settings remained highly satisfied with the group work experience.

 

>

Models of evaluation in educational technology

Page 6: Models of evalaution in educational technology

Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Model (1975).

Level Two: Evaluation

Its Findings:tend to suggest that online learning groups and peer-assessment processes provide a translational learning model that is able to situate students within contemporary organizational learning processes.

 

>

Models of evaluation in educational technology

Page 7: Models of evalaution in educational technology

Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Model (1975).

Level Three: BehaviorUsed as a check to see if the skills base underlying the pedagogy of online group work is actually being accessed and used by students

Its Findings:Students benefit from exposure to learning opportunities that enablethem to observe how others authentically behave, act and perform in a group learning context.

 

>

Models of evaluation in educational technology

Page 8: Models of evalaution in educational technology

1-www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/melbourne01/pdf/papers/baskinc.pdf

 

>

References