Modeling the Effects of a Radiological Dispersion Device Detonation

23
Modeling the Effects of a Radiological Dispersion Device Detonation Tragan Knight and Nathaniel Tidwell Dr. Melanie Sattler, P.E. Dr. Yvette Weatherton, P.E. Roja Haritha Gangupomu

description

Modeling the Effects of a Radiological Dispersion Device Detonation. Tragan Knight and Nathaniel Tidwell Dr. Melanie Sattler, P.E. Dr. Yvette Weatherton , P.E. Roja Haritha Gangupomu. Nathaniel Tidwell. Completed first year at North Central Texas College - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Modeling the Effects of a Radiological Dispersion Device Detonation

Page 1: Modeling the Effects of a Radiological Dispersion Device Detonation

Modeling the Effects of a Radiological Dispersion Device

DetonationTragan Knight and Nathaniel Tidwell

Dr. Melanie Sattler, P.E.Dr. Yvette Weatherton, P.E.

Roja Haritha Gangupomu

Page 2: Modeling the Effects of a Radiological Dispersion Device Detonation

Nathaniel TidwellCompleted first year at North Central Texas

CollegeAttending University of Texas Arlington as a

sophomoreMajoring in Mechanical Engineering

Page 3: Modeling the Effects of a Radiological Dispersion Device Detonation

Tragan KnightEastfield CollegeUniversity of Texas at ArlingtonMajor: Civil Engineering (Environmental

Engineer)Goals: Master (Material in Science) Ph.D.:

(Theology)Aspirations: Reevaluate and innovate the

recycling process.

Page 4: Modeling the Effects of a Radiological Dispersion Device Detonation

ObjectivesModel the effects of a dirty bomb detonation

at Cotton Bowl Stadium in Dallas, TexasUse the HotSpot air dispersion model to run

simulationsCompare different radionuclides, as well as

various atmospheric conditions

Page 5: Modeling the Effects of a Radiological Dispersion Device Detonation

Radiological Dispersion DevicesAlso known as RDDs, or “dirty bombs”Use conventional explosives to spread

radioactive material over an areaAlthough there is concern that terrorist

groups may use dirty bombs, so far none have actually been detonated.

Page 6: Modeling the Effects of a Radiological Dispersion Device Detonation

RadionuclidesIsotopes that undergo radioactive decaySeveral types of radionuclides are used in

medicine and industryWe used three different radionuclides in our

simulations: 241Am, 137Cs, and 60Co

This backscatter gauge, used in

industry, contains 137Cs.1

1 Nitus Gamma Backscatter Gauge. Digital image. ThermoScientific.com. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., n.d. Web. 23 July 2012.

Page 7: Modeling the Effects of a Radiological Dispersion Device Detonation

RadiationThree types of radioactive decay

Alpha Helium nucleus (alpha particle) is emitted from an

atom Most harmful, but least penetrating

Beta Electron or positron (beta particle) is emitted Moderate harm, and moderate penetration

Gamma Gamma rays are emitted Least harmful, but highly penetrating

Page 8: Modeling the Effects of a Radiological Dispersion Device Detonation

Total Effective Dose EquivalentSum of external and internal effective dose

equivalentsUnit of measure is the Sievert (Sv) or

roentgen equivalent in man (rem) for biological tissue1 Sv = 100 rems

Page 9: Modeling the Effects of a Radiological Dispersion Device Detonation

Biological Effects of RadiationEffect Dose

Blood count changes 50 remVomiting (threshold) 100 remMortality (threshold) 150 remLD50/60

* (with minimal supportive care)

320 – 360 rem

LD50/60 (with supportive medical treatment)

480 – 540 rem

100% mortality (with best available

treatment)

800 rem 

* The LD50/60 is that dose at which 50%of the exposed population will die within 60 days.

1"Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation." Princeton.edu. Trustees of Princeton University, 30 Apr. 2010. Web. 26 July 2012.

1

Page 10: Modeling the Effects of a Radiological Dispersion Device Detonation

Air Dispersion ModelingOften used to predict downwind

concentrations of pollutants, especially from smokestacks

We used HotSpot to model an RDD detonation, which uses the Gaussian Plume Model.

Page 11: Modeling the Effects of a Radiological Dispersion Device Detonation

Plume Model

Page 12: Modeling the Effects of a Radiological Dispersion Device Detonation

HotSpot 2.07.2Created by National Atmospheric Release

Advisory Center (NARAC)A computer program designed to calculate

radiation dosesUses the Gaussian EquationProvides numerous amounts of potential

radiological dispersal devices scenariosUsed for short-term, short-range (up to 10

km) simulations

Page 13: Modeling the Effects of a Radiological Dispersion Device Detonation

HotSpot 2.07.2Relatively simple surroundings data

Built-in standard terrain informationOne meteorological condition per run

Less sophisticated than other air dispersion models

Page 14: Modeling the Effects of a Radiological Dispersion Device Detonation

Parameters

Radionuclide Stability Class Rainfall241Am B Rain137Cs D No Rain60Co F

Mixture

Variables

4 radionuclides * 3 stability classes * 2 rainfall conditions = 24 runs

Page 15: Modeling the Effects of a Radiological Dispersion Device Detonation

Other ParametersMaterial-at-Risk 100 grams

High Explosives 100 pounds TNT equivalent

Wind Speed 4.8 m/s

Wind Direction 180° (from the south)

Rainfall Rate 5 mm/hr

Terrain city

Page 16: Modeling the Effects of a Radiological Dispersion Device Detonation

Running SimulationsHotSpot is very user-friendlyIt takes only a couple minutes to input terms

and view results

Page 17: Modeling the Effects of a Radiological Dispersion Device Detonation

Examples of Outputs

Page 18: Modeling the Effects of a Radiological Dispersion Device Detonation

Results

Inputs and Outputs from Hotspot.

Page 19: Modeling the Effects of a Radiological Dispersion Device Detonation

ResultsComparing differences in stability classes with 241Am

B D F

Page 20: Modeling the Effects of a Radiological Dispersion Device Detonation

ResultsThe figures below compare rainout and dry

conditions using 60Co and stability class B. No Rain Rain

Page 21: Modeling the Effects of a Radiological Dispersion Device Detonation

ResultsComparing

each isotope in dry conditions with stability class B

(a) 241Am(b) 137Cs(c) 60Co(d) Mixture

A

DC

B

Page 22: Modeling the Effects of a Radiological Dispersion Device Detonation

Conclusions60 Co generally had the highest TEDE137 Cs generally had the lowest TEDERadiation doses are higher in scenarios with

rainStability Class F had the largest isopleth area

of sickness in all scenariosWorst-case scenario is 60Co, stability class F,

in rainy conditions

Page 23: Modeling the Effects of a Radiological Dispersion Device Detonation

Thank You!