Modeling multiple ecosystem services and tradeoffs at
Transcript of Modeling multiple ecosystem services and tradeoffs at
Modeling multiple ecosystem services and tradeoffs at landscape scales
Erik Nelson, Guillermo Mendoza, James Regetz, Stephen Polasky, Heather Tallis, D Richard Cameron, Kai MA Chan, Gretchen C Daily, Joshua Goldstein, Peter Kareiva, Eric Lonsdorf, Robin Naidoo, Taylor H Ricketts, and M Rebecca Shaw
December 2008
2
Decision-maker questions
– What places provide the most ecosystem services?
– How would likely management scenarios affect different ecosystem services and biodiversity?
– What landscape pattern would optimize ecosystem services now and under likely scenarios?
– Who should pay whom under a proposed PES program, and how much?
InVEST
• Spatially explicit modeling tool – Multiple services– Ecological production functions – Economic valuation techniques
• Inputs:– Land use / land cover map, future scenarios– Data tables, GIS layers
• Outputs:– Biophysical production and economic value– Maps, trends, balance sheets, tradeoff analyses
• Product of Natural Capital Project
Testing ground: Willamette Valley, OR
Three scenariosof Land use change
Willamette Basin Partnership
Services / Attributes Considered
• Carbon sequestration
• Water quality
• Storm peak mitigation
• Soil conservation
• Biodiversity
• Market returns to landowners *
Comparing scenarios
More
Less
Mapping changes
Nelson, et al. in press. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
ArcGIS toolbox
http://invest.ecoinformatics.org
Key Points
• Services differ– spatial distribution– response to scenarios
• Strong spatial patterns in increase/decrease– distributional effects– management priorities
• Little evidence of trade-offs overall– Conservation scenario typically best– Market value only exception– (but that’s a big one)
Exploring tradeoffs
Exploring Tradeoffs
Nelson, et al. in press. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Monetizing additional services
• Requires beneficiaries, locations, valuation techniques
• Three outputs• Potential supply:
• typical maps: sources• Realized supply
• actually provides benefits to someone• Value
• economic valuation of realized supply
Example: Soil conservation
• Potential supply:• sediment retention
• Realized supply• sediment retention
upstream of dams• Value
• avoided costs of dam dredging
• Same potential supply layers drive multiple values
Example: Water supply
• Potential supply:• water yield
• Realized supply• net water yield upstream
of hydro plants• Value
• value of additional power
Take homes
• Mapping multiple ecosystem services possible
• Scenarios allow assessment of tradeoffs
• Payments in theory can change these tradeoffs
• Valuation needs beneficiaries
17
Thanks…NatCapKai ChanChris ColvinGretchen DailyHelen FoxPeter KareivaChuck KatzErik LonsdorfBruce McKenneyGuillermo MendozaBelinda MorrisRobin NaidooErik NelsonNasser OlweroSteve PolaskyJim RegetzSusan RuffoRebecca ShawHeather TallisChristine TamBuzz ThompsonMichael Wright
Willamette ValleyWillamette Partnership
SupportNSF-NCEASLeverhulme TrustPackard FoundationMacArthur FoundationMoore FoundationRoger and Vicki SantPeter and Helen Bing…
www.naturalcapitalproject.org
Now: can ask policy questions!
• How well will payment programs work?– changing landowner choices with PES
• Simulate different payment programs– predict landowner response– if payments exceed opportunity costs, land enrolled– different budgets
• Track improvements in two benefits– Species conservation– Market returns
Tradeoff Curves
Nelson et al. PNAS. 2007
Tradeoff Curves
Nelson et al. PNAS. 2007
• Different policies have different effects• None come close to efficiency frontier
Policy simulations
• 3 simple payment programs: – All: all landowners eligible for payments– Carbon: restrict to land that could convert to forest– Riparian: restrict to land along riparian corridors
• If payment exceeds WTA, landowner enrolls
• Various budget levels – $1 million– $5 million– $10 million
Willingness to accept payment
• How big a payment is needed for landowner to switch from current land use to conservation?
• “Opportunity costs” of conservation
REALLY Exploring Tradeoffs
• Plot full tradeoff curve for two benefits:– Species conservation: terrestrial vertebrates – Market returns: commodities and value of rural-
residential housing development
• Question:– Which landscape patterns maximize joint production?
• Explore full scenario space
Polasky, et al. 2008. Biological Conservation