Modeling Communities in Information Systems: Informal Learning Communities in Social Media
-
Upload
zina-petrushyna -
Category
Data & Analytics
-
view
511 -
download
0
Transcript of Modeling Communities in Information Systems: Informal Learning Communities in Social Media
Lehrstuhl Informatik 5(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
1/36
TeLLNet
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
M. Sc. Zinayida Kensche (née Petrushyna)
Doctoral Thesis Defense
Chair of Information Systems and Databases
RWTH Aachen University
Aachen
November 17, 2015
Modeling Communities in Information Systems: Informal Learning Communities in Social Media
Lehrstuhl Informatik 5(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
2/36
TeLLNet Outline
Motivation and Research Questions
Background and Context of Informal Learning
Continuous Support of Community Life Cycle
Test cases
– Modeling Informal Learning Communities in
Learning Forums
– Competence Management in Lifelong Learning Communities
Conclusion and Outlook
Lehrstuhl Informatik 5(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
3/36
TeLLNet
Formal learning communities are students in lectures
Informal learning communities are self-organized
Stakeholders care about their communities:
– What are insights of informal learning communities?
– Their success and failures?
– Can communities learn from other communities?
– How do communities evolve?
Motivation
Motivation
Backgroundand context
Methodology
Conclusions and Outlook
TechnicalContribution
Test Cases
Lehrstuhl Informatik 5(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
4/36
TeLLNet Social Media Usage for Informal Learning
Learning Analytics Conceptual Modeling
Formal learning: a MOOC
Informal learning:forums, blogs,mailing lists, chats, social network sites
Motivation
Backgroundand context
Methodology
Conclusions and Outlook
TechnicalContribution
Test Cases
Lehrstuhl Informatik 5(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
5/36
TeLLNet Research Questions
Connecting advanced computer science tools and learning theories –
the interdisciplinary character of the work Suh & Lee, 2006, Kleanthous & Dimitrova, 2007, 2010, Abel et al., 2011
Creating stereotype models and selecting suitable ones that describe community situations, needs, types, and future positions
Zhang & Taniru, 2005, Li et al. 2008, Hilts & Yu, 2011, Fereira & Silva, 2012
Advanced computer science tools support communities by providing results of analytical investigation and estimation of community needs
Wolpers et al., 2007, Kodinger et al., 2008, Upton & Kay, 2009, Dascalu et al., 2010,
Scheffel et al. 2011, Karam et al., 2012, Verbert et al., 2012, Rabbany k. et al., 2012
Motivation
Backgroundand context
Methodology
Conclusions and Outlook
TechnicalContribution
Test Cases
Lehrstuhl Informatik 5(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
6/36
TeLLNet
Networked learning & community of practice: learning in collaboration Wenger, 1998, Dillenbourg, 1999, Stahl, 2006
Learning Theories Recapitulation
1934 1954 19711972 1973 1980 1986 1998
Social constructivism: social influence on learning Vygotsky, 1934/1986
Social learning/cognitive theory: society is pivotal for a learner Bandura, 1971, 1986
1999 2006
Cognitivism: individual style of learning Pask and Scott, 1972
Behaviorism: learning processes are guided interactions are shaped, Skinner, 1954
Cognitive constructivism: learning by discovery Piaget, 1973, Papert, 1980
Teaching machine
Lack of social aspects of learning
Cognitive processes
Assimilating new and existing knowledge
Motivation
Backgroundand context
Methodology
Conclusions and Outlook
TechnicalContribution
Test Cases
Lehrstuhl Informatik 5(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
7/36
TeLLNet Community of Practice and Technology
Digital Media/
Community
Information Systems
Web 2.0 Processes/
i* Models/ Strategies(Cross-media Analysis)
Members(Social Network Analysis,
Community Detection &
Evolution)
Network of Artifacts(Emotional Analysis, Intent Analysis,
Information Retrieval. Social Network
Analysis)
Network of Members
Communities of practice
Media Networks
Communities of Practice: collaborating, sharing same goals and interestsWenger, 1998
Data management Klamma, 2010
Community analytics Yu, 2009
Conceptual modeling Klamma, 2013
correspond to CoP dimensions andactors in media networks
Motivation
Backgroundand context
Methodology
Conclusions and Outlook
TechnicalContribution
Test Cases
Lehrstuhl Informatik 5(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
8/36
TeLLNet Overview of Research Answers
Systematic workflow for overall approach Petrushyna et al., 2014
Ground laying model for informal learning communities in digital media Petrushyna et al., 2010
Repository of model stereotypes Petrushyna et al., 2014
Simulation approach for refining online informal learning community models
Tool set for modeling, monitoring and analyzing of informal learning communities in social media Petrushyna & Klamma, 2008, Klamma & Petrushyna, 2010, Krenge et al., 2011, Song et al., 2011, Petrushyna et al., 2014, Petrushyna et al., 2014a, Petrushyna et al., 2015
RQ1
RQ2
RQ2
RQ2
RQ3
Motivation
Backgroundand context
Methodology
Conclusions and Outlook
TechnicalContribution
Test Cases
Lehrstuhl Informatik 5(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
9/36
TeLLNet Technical Contributions
The metamodel of informal learning communities in digital media The i*-REST service for modeling communities in i* Petrushyna et al., 2014
Professional and social competence modeling using social networkanalysis Song et al., 2011
The general agent-based model of informal learning communities Community stereotype model repository Petrushyna et al., 2014
Mapping of i* models to Java based agents Simulations of agent-based models of learning communities
A design of data cube appropriate for heterogenous data storage and rapid query processing Klamma and Petrushyna, 2008
The TargETLy service for community analysis Petrushyna et al., 2015,
Krenge et al., 2011, Petrushyna et al., 2011
Implementation of community detection/evolution algorithms for large networks in distributive environment
The competence management support framework for lifelong learning communities Song et al., 2011
Estimation of learning quality using community analysis Pham et al., 2012
Modeling
Refinement
Monitoring
Analysis
Motivation
Backgroundand context
Methodology
Conclusions and Outlook
TechnicalContribution
Test Cases
Lehrstuhl Informatik 5(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
10/36
TeLLNet Workflow of Community Learning Analytics
Co
nti
nu
ou
s re
qu
irem
en
ts
Maintenance of stored community digital traces
Defining user patterns, emotions, intents, concepts and topics of interest
Detecting communities and their evolution
Communities are represented by stereotype modelsSmith and Kollock, 1999, Cheung et al., 2005, Madanmohan and Siddhesh, 2004,Niegemann and Domagk , 2005, Fisher et al., 2006, Turner et al., 2005
Models reveal community requirements and insights
Stakeholders maintain communities operating suitable models
Simulations used to identify possible community changes
Jarke et al., 2008
Petrushyna et al., 2014 RQ1
Modeling
Refinement
Monitoring
Analysis
Motivation
Backgroundand context
Methodology
Conclusions and Outlook
TechnicalContribution
Test Cases
Lehrstuhl Informatik 5(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
11/36
TeLLNet
Learningresource
Learning goal
Acceptance
Support learning process
Learner A Expert
Community Learner
Modeling: i* Modeling Approach for Informal Learning Community Modeling
RQ2
Dependency resource
Goal
Softgoal
Task
Agent Role
Depender Agent
Dependee Agent
+ models can beextended to describethe rationale of agents
+ point out dependencies betweenhuman and non-human agents
+ emphasize agents, their types and roles
+ indicate intentions in social networks
+ models can be createdusing XML-based format
- too abstract
- before applying i* modeling training is required
Motivation
Backgroundand context
Methodology
Conclusions and Outlook
TechnicalContribution
Test Cases
Lehrstuhl Informatik 5(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
12/36
TeLLNet Modeling: A General Learning Community Model
RQ2
Learner
Community
Learner A
composes
interacts
Learner B
creates
space for knowledge
sharing
rules and
policies
limitations
learns from
Resource dependency
Agent
Dependee
Depender
Task dependency
Agent
Goaldependency
Mutual engagement Shared repertoire Joint enterprises
Motivation
Backgroundand context
Methodology
Conclusions and Outlook
TechnicalContribution
Test Cases
ProcessProcess
ArtifactArtifact
initializes
D
D
MediumMedium hostsD D
consists of DD
influences
D
D
Lehrstuhl Informatik 5(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
13/36
TeLLNet
Resource dependency
Agent
Dependee
Depender
Task dependency
Agent
Goaldependency
Stereotypes of Learning Communities
Communities can be represented by stereotype models Smith and Kollock, 1999, Madanmohan and Siddhesh, 2004, Cheung et al., 2005, Niegemann and Domagk , 2005, Turner et al., 2005, Fisher et al., 2006
RQ2
Teacher-oriented Learner-oriented Lifelong learners-oriented
Question-answer Dispute Innovative
Culture-sensitive At workplace Community of interest
Motivation
Backgroundand context
Methodology
Conclusions and Outlook
TechnicalContribution
Test Cases
Lehrstuhl Informatik 5(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
14/36
TeLLNet
Refinement: A General Agent-based Model ofAn Informal Learning Community in Media
Society 𝑆𝑜𝑐 = 𝐴, 𝐴𝑐𝑡𝐴 = {𝐴1… 𝐴𝑛} is a set of agents
𝐴𝑐𝑡 is a set of predefined actions of agents 𝐴
𝐴𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑠𝑡 = 𝐴𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡1…𝐴𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑘𝑡 are created by agents A
with 𝐴𝑐𝑡 at 𝑡
𝑅 𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 × 𝐴 × ℝ+ are social relations, where 𝑡 is a time point
𝐴𝜃(𝑡)
𝐶𝑡, where 𝐶𝑡 = 𝐶1… 𝐶𝑚𝑡⊆ 𝐶 , 𝐶𝑡 is a set of communities
𝑀𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑎 = {𝑀𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑢𝑚1, … 𝑀𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑢𝑚𝑟}, where
𝐴𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑠𝑡𝜗(𝑡)
𝑀𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑢𝑚𝑖
𝑆 = 𝑆1… 𝑆𝑑 is a set of strategies of agents, where S = d ∈ Ν𝑆 = 𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦, 𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑎𝑐ℎ𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡
Connecting with known agents Rich get richer
Not a Web 2.0 Web 2.0Barabasi & Albert, 1999RQ2
Motivation
Backgroundand context
Methodology
Conclusions and Outlook
TechnicalContribution
Test Cases
Lehrstuhl Informatik 5(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
15/36
TeLLNet Monitoring: Mediabase Cube
Mediabase Cube includes all actors of a learning community in dimensions + additional Time dimension
Results of analysis are stored in Facts tablesRQ2
Klamma, 2010
Motivation
Backgroundand context
Methodology
Conclusions and Outlook
TechnicalContribution
Test Cases
Lehrstuhl Informatik 5(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
16/36
TeLLNet Analysis Workflow
interactions of learners Graph-based analysis
Services responsible for mutual engagement dimension
Services responsible for joint enterprises and shared repertoire dimensions
texts of communities Language-based analysis
Social Network Analysis
Community Detection & Evolution
Emotional Analysis
Intent Analysis
Information Retrieval
Communities, patterns, emotions, interests, intents
Motivation
Backgroundand context
Methodology
Conclusions and Outlook
TechnicalContribution
Test Cases
RQ3
Lehrstuhl Informatik 5(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
17/36
TeLLNet
Detection Define time intervals based on events of communities
𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑗 = 𝑏𝑒𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑗 , 𝑎𝑓𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑗 where j is an event
Modularity-based community detection Newman and Girvan, 2004
Propinquity algorithm Zhang et al. 2009
Evolution Mapping of communities using modified Jaccard index
𝑆𝑖𝑚 𝐶𝑖𝑗 , 𝐶𝑟𝑘 = max𝐶𝑖𝑗⋂𝐶𝑟𝑘
𝐶𝑖𝑗,𝐶𝑖𝑗⋂𝐶𝑟𝑘
𝐶𝑟𝑘≥ 𝑡ℎ𝑟𝑒𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑙𝑑
Gliwa et al. 2012
Event extraction Asur et al. 2009
Community events: dissolve, form , merge, split, and continue
Node events: appear, disappear, join and leave
Community Detection & Evolution
RQ3
Motivation
Backgroundand context
Methodology
Conclusions and Outlook
TechnicalContribution
Test Cases
Lehrstuhl Informatik 5(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
18/36
TeLLNet
Emotional analysis Pennbaker et al. 2007, Calvo and D‘Mello 2010
Intent analysis Tatu, 2008, Kröll, 2009, Strohmaier et al., 2012
POS tagging + syntactic language patterns
Verb to verb pattern 𝑉𝐵1_𝑡𝑜_𝑉𝐵2, e.g., learn to calculate
Wh-adverb to verb pattern 𝑊𝑅𝐵_𝑡𝑜_𝑉𝐵, e.g., how to estimate
Learning Concepts and Topics Siehndel et al. 2013, d'Aquin and Jay, 2013
Named entities are arguments of information units Grishman and Sundheim, 1996
POS tagging + domain analysis
Linked Open Data Cloud Berners-Lee et al., 2006
Language-based Analysis
Category Examples
posemo awesome, super,
negemo depress…, scary,
anger aggress…, stupid…,
cogmech infer…, problem…,
insight explain…, reason…,
Motivation
Backgroundand context
Methodology
Conclusions and Outlook
TechnicalContribution
Test Cases
RQ3
Lehrstuhl Informatik 5(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
19/36
TeLLNet Overview of Case Studies
Modeling Learning Communities in Learning Forums
Competence Management Support for European Teachers’ Communities
Cultural Analysis of Communities in 13 Wikipedia language projects
CommunityMedium (Forum)
usesn 1
Community Media (Project,E-mail, Blog)
uses1 n
TeLLNet
CommunityMedium
(Wiki)usesn 1
originatesfrom
Country 11
Motivation
Backgroundand context
Methodology
Conclusions and Outlook
TechnicalContribution
Test Cases
Lehrstuhl Informatik 5(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
20/36
TeLLNet
Modeling Learning Communities in Learning Forums
The language learning forum URCH # posts ≈ 429.000 # users ≈ 21.000 # threads ≈
68.000, Other datasets with 10⁵ - 4,8x10⁵ edges for testing
User patterns (k-means clustering and SNA) Intent analysis -> learning goals Emotional analysis -> user attitude Named entities of community texts
Modeling
Refinement
Monitoring
Analysis
Petrushyna et al., 2014Petrushyna et al., 2015
A community can be represented by a steeotype model or models from repository
Stakeholders can decide about changes they need to conduct in communities
Motivation
Backgroundand context
Methodology
Conclusions and Outlook
TechnicalContribution
Test Cases
Lehrstuhl Informatik 5(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
21/36
TeLLNet
Modeling Learning Communities in Learning Forums
The language learning forum URCH # posts ≈ 429.000 # users ≈ 21.000 # threads ≈
68.000, Other datasets with 10⁵ - 4,8x10⁵ edges for testing
i* actors: users, threads, forums, user roles, topics of interest Dependencies: user intents, user activities, actor dependencies
User patterns (k-means clustering and SNA) Intent analysis -> learning goals Emotional analysis -> user attitude Named entities of community texts
Simulations using network strategies: reciprocity and preferential attachment
A number of possible community states in future
Modeling
Refinement
Monitoring
Analysis
Petrushyna et al., 2014Petrushyna et al., 2015
Motivation
Backgroundand context
Methodology
Conclusions and Outlook
TechnicalContribution
Test Cases
Lehrstuhl Informatik 5(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
22/36
TeLLNet
Architecture for Community Learning Analytics Framework
Motivation
Backgroundand context
Methodology
Conclusions and Outlook
TechnicalContribution
Test Cases
Lehrstuhl Informatik 5(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
23/36
TeLLNet
How to Realize Continuous Support of Informal Learning Communities?
01-10.12.2004# posts = 471
# users = 22
# adjacent nodes = 43
# high influence users = 13
# low influence users = 2
need to learnwant to write
take to solve
started to take practice
prepared to take beast
trying to learn stuff
# posts = 226
# users = 20
# adjacent nodes = 15
# high influence users = 4
# low influence users = 4
how to answer
instructed to take writing
supposed to answerplan to take GRE
take to solve
Petrushyna et al., 2015
08-17.12.2004
Models of a learning community in URCH forums
Motivation
Backgroundand context
Methodology
Conclusions and Outlook
TechnicalContribution
Test Cases
Lehrstuhl Informatik 5(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
24/36
TeLLNet
Strategies:
Reciprocity only
High Reciprocity low PA
50% Reciprocity and 50% PA
Can Model Simulations Predict Community Evolutions?
initial 30 days later
Simulated behaviors of learners differ according to strategies (reciprocity and preferential attachment (PA)) and activity probabilities (maps)
Betweenness Closeness Clustering Degree
Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests of measure distributions show a better correlation (<.5) between real and simulated community learners with >39 users
Motivation
Backgroundand context
Methodology
Conclusions and Outlook
TechnicalContribution
Test Cases
Lehrstuhl Informatik 5(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
25/36
TeLLNet
40% follow life cycle of self-regulated learning in cliques (tightly connected groups) while others need a support
Estimation of Self-Regulated Theory Using Community Analysis
Krenge et al., 2011
Nussbaumer et al., 2011
Thread 1Thread 2
Thread 3
A user of a clique
A non-clique user
in a thread
A clique-user
missing in a
thread
Time
Maintain Profile
Select Resource
Learn
Reflect
Motivation
Backgroundand context
Methodology
Conclusions and Outlook
TechnicalContribution
Test Cases
Lehrstuhl Informatik 5(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
26/36
TeLLNet
21 i* experts evaluated i* models oflearning communities: social network analysis (71%) and
intent analysis (90%) are helpful forcreating i* models
community stakeholders canunderstand community situationsbetter using i* models (86%)
emphasizing community requirements for developers (86%)
i* models can be abstract and notstraightforward
Training is required before stakeholderscan use models
Evaluation of Community Analytics Techniques
SocialNetwork Analysis
Community DetectionandEvolution
IntentAnalysis
NamedEntitiesRetrieval
Motivation
Backgroundand context
Methodology
Conclusions and Outlook
TechnicalContribution
Test Cases
Lehrstuhl Informatik 5(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
27/36
TeLLNet
Competence Management Support for European Teachers’ Communities
Modeling
Refinement
Monitoring
Analysis
Self-monitoring and self-reflection for teachers Kitsantas, 2002
Other stakeholders refine community situations based on monitoring and analysis
≈164K teachers, ≈20K projects, ≈39K emails, ≈35K blog posts Data transformation is required, e. g., ≈ 130K with wrong
country value
Competence indicators for teachers, communities and stakeholders Song et al., 2011
Analysis of different media networks Pham et al., 2012
i* actors: project performance, activity, popularity, e-mail communicating skills, etc.
eTwinning let European teachers cooperate with the means of projects, e-mails, blogs, comments, contact lists, walls, etc. Competence is the knowledge, skills, attitudes, … related to tasks McClelland, 1973
Motivation
Backgroundand context
Methodology
Conclusions and Outlook
TechnicalContribution
Test Cases
Lehrstuhl Informatik 5(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
28/36
TeLLNet How to Support Self-Monitoring of Learners?Reports for teachers and other stakeholder using competence indicators :
project performance (PP) e-mail communication (EC) blog writing (BW)
PP EC BW CW A N
Song et al., 2011
𝐴 𝑡 = 𝑁𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑗 𝑡 +1
2× [(𝑁 𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑙𝑠𝑜𝑢𝑡 + 𝐶𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑦𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑑𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑒 + 𝑁 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑗𝑏𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑃𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑡 +
𝑁 𝑏𝑙𝑜𝑔𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑡 + 𝑁 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑧𝑒𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑡 + 𝑁 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑗𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑡 ],
where xxx𝐶𝑜𝑚 is a comment in a blog or devoted to a prize or a project
Teacher 1 Teacher 2 Teacher 3 Teacher 4 Teacher 5 Teacher 6
comment writing (CW), activity(A) notability (N)
10
8
6
4
2
0
Motivation
Backgroundand context
Methodology
Conclusions and Outlook
TechnicalContribution
Test Cases
Lehrstuhl Informatik 5(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
29/36
TeLLNet
Estimation of Quality of Project Participation Using Community Analysis
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Fre
quency
Number of quality labels
(a) Quality labels and number of projects/blogs+blog posts/contacts/wall posts
Blog
Contact
Project
Wall
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Degre
e
Number of quality labels
(b) Quality labels and degree
Blog
Contact
Project
Wall
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Betw
eenness
Number of quality labels
(c) Quality labels and betweenness
Blog
Contact
Project
Wall
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 700
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Clu
ste
ring
Number of quality labels
(d) Quality labels and clustering
Blog
Contact
Project
Wall
Quality labels (QL) are prizes according to eTwinningambassadors (active stakeholders)
Number of QL correlates positively with betweennessof teachers in project networks
Pham et al.,2012
Motivation
Backgroundand context
Methodology
Conclusions and Outlook
TechnicalContribution
Test Cases
Lehrstuhl Informatik 5(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
30/36
TeLLNet
Accelerating Community Detection and Evolution on Single PC using GPU
Dataset URCH STDocNet
Number of snapshots 378 685
Number of edges ≈300K ≈480K
GPU running time 30 min 22 min
CPU running time > 4 h > 3h
Dataset URCH STDocNet
Number of snapshots 1 1
Number of edges 9110 1188
Number of nodes 857 263
GPU running time 30 min 1.5s
CPU running time ≈2 h 4s
GPU implementationis efficient for bignetworks with > 1Kedges
GPU implementationallows detection ofhuge communitiesusing just ONE! PC
Motivation
Backgroundand context
Methodology
Conclusions and Outlook
Technical Contribution
Test Cases
GPU
CPU
10K 25K 50K 100K
2.5K
2K
1.5K
1K
0.5K
Seconds
Edges
Lehrstuhl Informatik 5(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
31/36
TeLLNet Contributions and Conclusions
Modeling Refinement Monitoring Analysis
The workflow for Community Learning Analytics:
Toolset for modeling, refinement, monitoring and analysis of informal online learning communities
Support of informal online learning community stakeholders by integrating computer science approach with community of practice theory
A metamodel of learning communities and its stereotype models
Motivation
Backgroundand context
Conclusions and Outlook
Technical Contribution
Test Cases
Methodology
Lehrstuhl Informatik 5(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
32/36
TeLLNet Contributions in Informal Learning Context
The workflow proposes a structure for analytical investigation of informal learning communities
A toolset for validating learning theories’ assumptions
Justifying computer science approaches for community of practice analysis
Abstract modeling of informal learning communities emphasizing human and non-human agents
Validating existing theoretical community patterns
Motivation
Backgroundand context
Conclusions and Outlook
Technical Contribution
Test Cases
Methodology
Lehrstuhl Informatik 5(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
33/36
TeLLNet Limitations and Follow-up Research
Refinement of the toolset to perform near real-time monitoring, analysis and modeling Derntl et al., 2015
Extension of community analysis tools with other techniques, e.g. prediction models of student success
Involvement of new features and strategies for community simulation
The usage of heterogeneous media: SNSs, Twitter
Motivation
Backgroundand context
Conclusions and Outlook
Technical Contribution
Test Cases
Methodology
Lehrstuhl Informatik 5(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
34/36
TeLLNet Acknowledgements
To my supervisors
To my family
To my colleagues and friends
To my students
TEE
Lehrstuhl Informatik 5(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
35/36
TeLLNet ReferencesFabian Abel, Ilknur Celik, Claudia Hauff, Laura Hollink, and Geert-Jan Houben. U-Sem: Semantic Enrichment, User Modeling and Mining of Usage Data on the Social Web. In Proceedings of USEWOD2011 at the 20th WWW Conference, Hyderabad, India, 28 March, 2011.
Sitaram Asur, Srinivasan Parthasarathy, and Duygu Ucar. An Event-based Framework for Characterizing the Evolutionary Behavior of Interaction Graphs. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD), 3(4):16:1–16:36, 2009.
Albert Bandura. Social learning theory. General Learning Press, New York, 1971.
Albert Bandura. Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice Hall, 1986.
Tim Berners-Lee, Wendy Hall, James Hendler, Nigel Shadbolt, and Daniel J. Weitzner. Creating a Science of the Web. Science 313, no. 5788 (2006): 769‐771. 10.1126/science.1126902.
Albert-László Barabási, Réka Albert: Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439), pp. 509–512
Rafael A. Calvo and Sidney D’Mello: Affect Detection: An Interdisciplinary Review of Models, Methods, and Their Applications. Affective Computing, IEEE Transactions on, 1(1), pp. 18–37, 2010.
Cheung, Karen S. K., Lee, Fion S. L., Ip, Rachael K. F. et al. (2005) The Development of Successful On-Line Communities. International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management 13(1): 77‐89
McClelland, D. C. Testing for Competence Rather than for "Intelligence”. American Psychologist 20 (1973): 321–333.
Mihai Dascalu, Traian Rebedea, and Stefan Trausan-Matu. A Deep Insight in Chat Analysis: Collaboration, Evolution and Evaluation, Summarization and Search. In Darina Dicheva and Danail Dochev, editors, Artificial Intelligence: Methodology, Systems, and Applications, volume 6304 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 191–200. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010.
Mathieu d’Aquin and Nicolas Jay. Interpreting data mining results with linked data for learning analytics. In Dan Suthers, Katrien Verbert, Erik Duval, and Xavier Ochoa, editors, the Third International Conference, page 155-164, 2013.
Derntl, Michael, Nicolaescu, Petru, Erdtmann, Stephan, Klamma, Ralf, and Jarke, Matthias. “Near Real-Time Collaborative Conceptual Modeling on the Web.” In Paul Johannesson, Mong Li Lee, Stephen W. Liddle, Andreas L. Opdahl, Óscar Pastor López Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER 2015), pp.345-356
Pierre Dillenbourg. What do you mean by collaborative learning? In Pierre Dillenbourg, editor, Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches, pages 1–19. Oxford: Elsevier, 1999b.
Tiago Lopes Ferreira and Alberto Rodrigues Silva: Foster an Implicit Community Based on a Newsletter Tracking System. In Robert Meersman, Herv´e Panetto, Tharam Dillon, Stefanie Rinderle-Ma, Peter Dadam, Xiaofang Zhou, Siani Pearson, Alois Ferscha, Sonia Bergamaschi, and IsabelF Cruz, editors, On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems, volume 7565 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 398–415. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012
Danyel Fisher, Marc Smith , Howard T. Welser (2006) You Are Who You Talk To: Detecting Roles in Usenet Newsgroups. In: Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, p 59.2
Bogdan Gliwa, Stanisław Saganowski, Anna Zygmunt, Piotr Brodka, Przemysław Kazienko, and Jarosław Kozlak: Identification of Group Changes in Blogosphere. In Proceedings of International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining: Proceedings of ASONAM, pp. 1201–1206. IEEE Computer Society, 2012.
Ralph Grishman and Beth Sundheim. Message Understanding Conference-6: A Brief History. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Computational Linguistics: Proceedings of GOLING, volume 1, pages 466–471, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 1996. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Andrew Hilts and Eric Yu: Intentional Modeling of Social Media Design Knowledge for Government-Citizen Communication. In Martin Atzmueller, Andreas Hotho, Markus Strohmaier, and Alvin Chin, editors, Analysis of Social Media and Ubiquitous Data, volume 6904 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 20–36. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011.
Matthias Jarke, Ralf Klamma, Gerhard Lakemeyer, and Dominik Schmitz: Continuous, Requirements-Driven Support for Organizations, Networks, and Communities. In Proceedings of the 3rd International i* Workshop, Recife, Brazil, February 11-12, 2008, pp 47–50
Roula Karam, Piero Fraternali, Alessandro Bozzon, and Luca Galli: Modeling End-Users as Contributors in Human Computation Applications. In Alberto Abell´o, Ladjel Bellatreche, and BoualemBenatallah, editors, Proceedings of Model and Data Engineering (MEDI) 2012, Poitiers, France , 3-5 October, pp. 3–15. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012.
Ralf Klamma: Werkzeuge und Modelle für die Übergreifende Untersuchung von Social Software. i-com, 9(3), pp. 12–20, 2010.
Ralf Klamma, Zinayida Petrushyna. Pattern-Based Competence Management: On the Gap between Intentions and Reality, In Proceedings of 11th IFIP WG 5.5 Working Conference on Virtual Enterprises (PRO-VE), St. Etienne, France, October 11-13, 2010, pp. 364-371
Ralf Klamma and Zinayida Petrushyna. The Troll Under the Bridge: Data Management for Huge Web Science Mediabases. In Proceedings of the 38. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft f¨ur Informatik e.V. (GI), die INFORMATIK, pages 923–928. Köllen Druck+Verlag GmbH, Bonn, 2008.
Ralf Klamma: Community Learning Analytics – Challenges and Opportunities. In Jhing-Fa Wang and Rynson W. H. Lau, editors, Advances in Web-Based Learning - ICWL 2013: Proceedings of ICWL 2013, volume 8167 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 284–293, Kenting, Taiwan, October 6-9, 2013.
Lehrstuhl Informatik 5(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
36/36
TeLLNet ReferencesStyliani Kleanthous and Vania Dimitrova: Semantic enhanced approach for modelling cognitive relationships in virtual communities. In J. Vassileva, M. Tzagarakis, and V. Dimitrova, editors, Proceedings of Workshop on Adaptation and Personalisation in Social Systems: Groups, Teams, Communities: Proceedings of Workshop on Adaptation and Personalisation in Social Systems: Groups, Teams, Communities held at 11th International Conference on UM07, Corfu, Greece, July 25-29, 2007.
Styliani Kleanthous and Vania Dimitrova: Analyzing Community Knowledge Sharing Behavior. In Paul de Bra, Alfred Kobsa, and David Chin, editors, Proceedings of User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization: Proceedings of UMAP, volume 6075 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 231–242. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010.
Julian Krenge, Zinayida Petrushyna, Milos Kravcik, Ralf Klamma: Identification of Learning Goals in Forum-based Communities, In Proceedings of 11th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), Athens, GA, USA, 6-8 July, 2011, pp. 307-309
Kröll, M., and Strohmaier, M. “Analyzing human intentions in natural language text.” Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Knowledge capture (2009): 197–198. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1597735.1597780.
Madanmohan TR, Navelkar S (2004) Roles and knowledge management in online technology communities: an ethnography study. International Journal of Web Based Communities 1: 71‐89
Mark E. J. Newman and Michelle Girvan: Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 69, 2004.
Helmut M. Niegemann, Steffi Domagk (2005) ELEN project Evaluation Report
Reihaneh Rabbany k., Mansoureh Takaffoli, and Osmar R. Zaiane: Social Network Analysis and Mining to Support the Assessment of On-line Student Participation. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl., 13(2), pp. 20–29, 2012.
G. Pask and B.C.E. Scott. Learning strategies and individual competence. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 4:217–253, 1972.
Seymour Papert. Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books, Inc, 1980.
James W. Pennebaker, Cindy K. Chung, Molly. Ireland, Amy. Gonzales, and Roger J. Booth. The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC2007, 2007.
Zinayida Petrushyna, Ralf Klamma: No Guru, No Method, No Teacher: Self-Oberservation and Self-Modelling of E-Learning Communities. In Proceedings of 3rd European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, (EC-TEL), Maastricht, The Netherlands, pp. 354-365, September, 2008
Zinayida Petrushyna, Ralf Klamma, Milos Kravcik: Designing During Use: Modeling of Communities of Practice, In Proceedings of 4th IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (DEST), Dubai, U.A.E., 13-16 April 2010, pp. 612-617
Zinayida Petrushyna, Alexander Ruppert, Ralf Klamma, Dominik Renzel, Matthias Jarke: i*-REST: Light-Weight Modeling with RESTful Web Services. Published in F. Dalpiaz, J. Horkoff, editors, Proceedings of the Seventh International i* Workshop co-located with the 26th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE), Thessaloniki, Greece, June 16-17, 2014, CEUR Workshop Proceedings 1157, paper 15.
Jean Piaget. The child’s conception of the world. Paladin, St. Albans, Great Britain, 1973.
Zinayida Petrushyna, Ralf Klamma, Milos Kravcik. On Modeling Learning Communities. In Proceedings of 10th European Conference of Technology Enhanced Learning (EC-TEL), Toledo, Spain, September 16-18, 2015, pp. 254-267
Manh Cuong Pham, Yiwei Cao, Zinayida Petrushyna, and Ralf Klamma. Learning Analytics in a Teachers’ Social Network. In et al. Hodgson, editor, Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Networked Learning (NLC 2012), 2012.
Maren Scheffel, Katja Niemann, Abelardo Pardo, Derick Leony, Martin Friedrich, Kerstin Schmidt, Martin Wolpers, and Carlos Delgado Kloos: Usage pattern recognitionin student activities. In Carlos Delgado Kloos, Denis Gilet, Raquel Crespo-Garcia, Fridolin Wild, and Martin Wolpers, editors, Towards Ubiquitous Learning, volume 6964 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 341–355. Springer, 2011.
Patrick Siehndel, Ricardo Kawase, Asmelash Teka Hadgu, and Eelco Herder. Finding Relevant Missing References in Learning Courses. In Proceedings of the 22Nd International Conference on WorldWide Web Companion, WWW ’13 Companion, pages 425–430, Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland, 2013. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee.
B.F Skinner. The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, pages 88–97, 1954.
Marc A. Smith, Peter Kollock (eds) (1999) Communities in Cyberspace. Routledge, London, New York
Ergang Song, Zinayida Petrushyna, Yiwei Cao, Ralf Klamma: Learning Analytics at Large: The Lifelong Learning Network of 160, 000 European Teachers, In Carlos Delgado Kloos, Denis Gillet, Raquel M. Crespo García, Fridolin Wild, Martin Wolpers (Eds.): Towards Ubiquitous Learning –Proceedings of 6th European Conference of Technology Enhanced Learning (EC-TEL), Palermo, Italy, September 20-23, 2011, pp. 398-411
G. Stahl. Group cognition: computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Acting with technology. MIT Press, 2006.
Lehrstuhl Informatik 5(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
37/36
TeLLNet ReferencesStrohmaier, Markus, and Kröll, Mark. “Acquiring knowledge about human goals from Search Query Logs.” Information Processing & Management 48, no. 1 (2012): 63–82.
Hee-Joen Suh and Seung-Wook Lee: Collaborative Learning Agent for Promoting Group Interaction. ETRI, 28(4), pp. 461–474, 2006.
Kimberley Upton and Judy Kay. Narcissus: Group and Individual Models to Support Small Group Work. In Geert-Jan Houben, Gord McCalla, Fabio Pianesi, and Massimo Zancanaro, editors, User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, volume 5535 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 54–65. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009.
Marta Tatu: Discovering Intentions in Text and Semantic Calculus: Intention Overview, Classification, Representation, Discovery and Interactions with Other Semantic Relations. VDM Verlag, Saarbrücken, Germany, Germany, 2008.
Tammara Combs Turner, Marc A. Smith, Danyel Fisher et al. (2005) Picturing Usenet: Mapping Computer-Mediated Collective Action. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10: 7
Katrien Verbert, Nikos Manouselis, Hendrik Drachsler, and Erik Duval. Dataset-driven research to support learning and knowledge analytics. Educational Technology &Society, 15(3), pp. 133–148, 2012.
Lev Vygotsky. Thought and Language. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1934/1986.
Etienne Wenger: Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1998.
Martin Wolpers, Jad Najjar, Katrien Verbert, and Erik Duval: Tracking Actual Usage:the Attention Metadata Approach. Educational Technology & Society, 10(3), pp. 106– 121, 2007.
Eric Siu-Kwong Yu: Social Modeling and i*. In Conceptual Modeling: Foundations and Applications: Essays in Honor of John Mylopoulos, edited by Alex. Borgida, Akmal B. Chaudhri, Paolo Giorgini and Eric Siu-Kwong Yu, pp. 99–121. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009.
Yiwen Zhang and Mohan Tanniru: An Agent-Based Approach to Study Virtual Learning Communities. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, HI, USA, 3-6 January, 2005.
Yuzhou Zhang, Jianyong Wang, Yi Wang, and Lizhu Zhou: Parallel Community Detection on Large Networks with Propinquity Dynamics. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge and Discovery and Data Mining, Paris, France — June 28 - July 01, 2009, pp. 997–1005.
„Iceberg“ von Created by Uwe Kils (iceberg) and User:Wiska Bodo (sky). - (Work by Uwe Kils) http://www.ecoscope.com/iceberg/. Lizenziert unter CC BY-SA 3.0 über Wikimedia Commons -https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Iceberg.jpg#/media/File:Iceberg.jpg