Web-Based Experiments for the Study of Collective Social Dynamics
Mode dynamics and active control studies and experiments...
Transcript of Mode dynamics and active control studies and experiments...
"Mode dynamics and active control studies andexperiments on RFX-mod"
Acknowledgement to the RFX and Extrap-T2R teams
10th Workshop on MHD Stability Control, Madison (WI) 31 October - 2 November 2005
R. Paccagnella
OutlineOutline
• Control system in RFX-mod• Theoretical Models predictions• Virtual shell experiments:
-mode spectrum-RWM & tearing behaviour-plasma sawtoothing
• Conclusions
Control system in RFX-mod
Sensor coil array:
48x4=192saddle coils Each coilhas 90° poloidal, 360/48=7.5°toroidal extent
SENSORS COILS
Active coil array:
48x4=192 saddle coils Each coilhas 90° poloidal, 360/48=7.5°toroidal extent
Full surface coverage
50 msec (Bv) Cu thin shell
Control system in RFX-mod
4 x 48 radial flux sensors
4 x 48 coils
Measured and Controlled harmonics:
m=0,2 0 <= n <= +24 m = 1 -23 <= n <= +24
Digital controller:
“Virtual Shell” VS : i-th measured rad. Flux zeroed by i-th active coil
Mode control:
Magnetic sensors-> FFT-> harmonics -> gains -> invFFT -> coils responsem,n
• 3D MHD feedback studies using (amodified) DEBS code
• Linear cylindrical model with a discretecoil system
• 3D MHD feedback studies using (amodified) DEBS code
• Linear cylindrical model with a discretecoil system
Theoretical Models
3D DEBS code:3D DEBS code:
•Nonlinear visco-resistive MHD
•cylindrical geometry
•finite difference in radius, Fourier in θ and φ(pseudo-spectral)
• up to 2 “thin” resistive walls
• jump conditions on the external coils for each m,n(coils produce “clean” harmonics)
•Nonlinear visco-resistive MHD
•cylindrical geometry
•finite difference in radius, Fourier in θ and φ(pseudo-spectral)
• up to 2 “thin” resistive walls
• jump conditions on the external coils for each m,n(coils produce “clean” harmonics)
R. Paccagnella, D. Schnack, M. Chu, Phys. of Plasmas 9 (2002)234
Mode control
RFP RWM control ok!
10-10
10-9
10-8
10-7
10-6
10-5
0.0001
0.001
0.01
-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30
n
externalRWMs
dynamomodes
Fig.5
Non resonant RWMs
NonlinearSpectrum (DEBS)
m=1 modes
3D spectrum agrees w. linearpredictions:
3D spectrum agrees w. linear3D spectrum agrees w. linearpredictions:predictions:
Linear growth rates
No non-linear coupling of RWMs
RFX-mod & linear theory :RFX-mod & linear theory :RFX-mod & linear theory :
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
-14 -13 -12 -11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
#17262
gamma*tauw (linear results)normalized spectral m=1 amplitudes
gam*tauw
n
RWMs No Control
@ 30 msec
Too early forExp. RWMs
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
expfit#17302
b(-6)_exp
b(-6)_lin
b(-5)_exp
b(-5)_lin
b(-4)_exp
b(-4)_lin
time (msec)
[mT]
Internally non-resonant RWMs
RFX-mod & linear theory :RFX-mod & linear theory :RFX-mod & linear theory :
No Control on RWMs
3D simulations & RFX-mod :3D simulations & RFX-mod :3D simulations & RFX-mod :
Good Control in 3D runs(control applied only on RWMs)
Good Control in VS shots on RFX-mod
4 10-5
5 10-5
6 10-5
7 10-5
8 10-5
9 10-510-4
2 10-4
0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16
brE_stat_17216-410
1,-5
1,-6
1,-4
1,-7
1,-8
1,-9
1,-10
1,2
1,3
1,4
time
[ mT ]
10-8
10-7
10-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
1.3 1.35 1.4 1.45 1.5 1.55
Wr( 1, -4)
Wr( 1, -5)
Wr( 1, -6)
Wr( 1, -7)
Wr( 1, -8)
Wr( 1, -9)
Wr( 1,-10)
Wr( 1, 4)
Wr( 1, 2)
Wr( 1, 3)
Time
3D simulations of induced SH & RFX-mod experiment :
3D simulations of induced SH3D simulations of induced SH & RFX-mod experiment : & RFX-mod experiment :
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
t (ms)
amplitude[ brad
n ]
m=1
-1-2-3-4
-5-6-7-8-9
Controlled 1/-7 in RFX-mod
10-9
10-8
10-7
10-6
10-5
0.0001
0.001
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
eps42wf3_4/f5_10Wr( 0, 1)Wr( 0, 2)Wr( 1, 1)Wr( 1, 2)Wr( 1, 3)Wr( 1, 4)Wr( 1, 5)Wr( 1, -1)Wr( 1, -2)Wr( 1, -3)Wr( 1, -4)Wr( 1, -5)Wr( 1, -6)Wr( 1, -7)Wr( 1, -8)Wr( 1, -9)Wr( 1,-10)Wr( 1,-11)Wr( 1,-12)Wr( 1,-13)
Time
Controlled 1/-7 in DEBS
#17520
R. Paccagnella, Proc. of Theory of Fusion Plasma Joint Varenna-Lausanne International Workshop, ISPP-20, 73 (2002) (ed. SIF Bologna, Italy)
-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 300
0.5
1shot # 17520@ time (msec)= 100
Discretized coils system
Linear feedback stabilization model(cylindrical)
N
n n+ k N(k=+/-1, +/-2 ..)
Aliasing effect
m m+ j M(j=+/-1, +/-2 ..)
M
Linear feedback stabilization model
R. Paccagnella, D. Gregoratto, A. Bondeson, Nucl. Fusion 42(2002) 1102.
))((
)()1(
)(2 '
'
22
2
,
2
,wm
fm
wnm
w
fanm nK
nK
n
m
s
nM
ε
ε
εγτ
εεπ+
−−=
''''' ' ''1 nmnmMlmm Npnn nmmn
sensmn MSFIb
P ∑ ∑== += +=
Forms factorof coils and sensors
The transfer function has a pole for MHD unstable modesγ ◊ complex(to allow slow rotation)
m,n
ExtrapT2 vs. Linear feedback stabilization model:
D. Gregoratto, et. al. Phys. of Plasmas 12 (2005) 092510.
Sawtoothing on RFX-mod :thermal effects
SawtoothingSawtoothing on RFX-mod : on RFX-mod :thermal effectsthermal effects
40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550 SXR
m=0,n=1
#17116
m/n=0/1 & SXR
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
SXR
m=1,n=-7
m=1,-7 & SXR
In antiphase
In phase