Mod_24_10 Introducing Loss of Profits as a Relevant Damage
description
Transcript of Mod_24_10 Introducing Loss of Profits as a Relevant Damage
1
Mod_24_10Introducing Loss of Profits
as a Relevant Damage within the Limitation of Liability Provisions
2
By default as the primary central party in the SEM, SEMO and its activities have being used both in the illustration of Modification Proposal Mod_24_10 and in this presentation to the Modifications Committee.
This by no means attributes any actions or inactions to SEMO.
Neither does it serve as any statement to indicate a Dispute Process to which SEMO is, or may be, a Disputing Party.
The illustrations have simply being to enable greater understanding of the proposed modification.
Disclaimer
3
Mismatch of ResponsibilityLiability rests on market participants for actions/processes that are under the full control of central parties
Insufficiency of Dispute ProcessThe dispute process essentially provides no remedy and potentially could exacerbate rather than resolve disputes
Materiality of Action/InactionIn a centralised, gross mandatory pool an act or omission of a central party can affect a market participant’s entire revenue stream
Loss of profitEasily calculable financial loss
Mitigating ActionCentral parties can seek and obtain liability insurance
Why?
4
“Responsibility and authority (control) should be equal…”
Barrels of Oil SpilledBP Share Price
5…but they often are not
6
In SEM
7
Multiple Opportunities in Settlement
Data Query
Settlement Query
Resettlement
Re-pricing
Single point of failure
One Opportunity in Scheduling
Single Gate Closure
8
T&SC provides for dispute resolution…
…but liability is limited to physical damage to property or personnel
Dispute Resolution process is insufficient…
9
In a electronic, financially-settled market…
…the potential for physical damage is remote
…because it ignores the nature of the SEM
10
→ Court Proceedings
→ Amicable Dispute Settlement
→ DRB
Good Faith Negotiations
early intervention best…
…without a reasonable remedy early in the process, the chances for frustration increase
Stages in Dispute Resolution Process
11
In BETTA?
12
• SECTION H: GENERAL• 6.2 Limitation of liability• 6.2.1 For the purposes of this paragraph 6.2, references to a Party includes any
of its officers,• employees or agents.• 6.2.2 Subject to the succeeding provisions of this paragraph 6.2, each Party
agrees and• acknowledges that:• (a) no Party shall be liable to any other Party for loss arising from any breach of
the• Code other than for loss directly resulting from such breach and which at the• Code Effective Date was reasonably foreseeable as not unlikely to occur in the• ordinary course of events from such breach in respect of:• (i) physical damage to the property of any other Party, and/or• (ii) the liability (in law) of any other such Party to any other person for• loss in respect of physical damage to the property of such person;• (b) no Party shall in any circumstances be liable in respect of any breach of the• Code to any other Party for:• (i) any loss of profit, loss of revenue, loss of use, loss of contract, loss• of goodwill, or increased cost of working; or• (ii) any indirect or consequential loss; or• (iii) except as provided in paragraphs 6.2.2(a)(ii) and 6.2.4, loss resulting• from the liability of any other Party to any other person howsoever• and whensoever arising.
BETTA provisions essentially word-for-word…
T&SC s.2.317 – 2.318
…no Party shall be liable to any other Party for loss arising from any breach of the Code other than for loss directly resulting from such breach…in respect of:
(i) physical damage to the property of any other Party,
and/or(b) no Party shall in any
circumstances be liable in respect of any breach of theCode to any other Party for:(i) any loss of profit, loss of revenue…
…but appearances can be deceiving
13In BETTA Materiality is minimal
Bilateral Contract Volume
Accepted BM bid or offer volume
Imbalance volume
metered
contractedUK
Electricity Volume (MWh)
2-3%
1-2% BETTAc.5%
c.95%
Sources: National Grid, Association of Electricity Producers
14
Variable Price Maker wind unit
COD is economic and meets all requirements
However nomination does not make it to Market Schedule…
Revenue =
energy payments +
capacity payments +
REFIT support (assume not constrained on)
= 0
In SEM Materiality is all-encompassing – up to 100% of Revenue
15
Loss of Profits……balances remedy against degree of injury
…simple…easily calculable….relatively inexpensive
Loss of Profits vs. other financial loss
Loss of…
…income, contract, anticipated savings, investment return, goodwill, use, reputation
…not easily determined…subjective…excessive
16
Central Parties can obtain liability insurance
Mitigating action
17
Mismatch of ResponsibilityLiability rests on market participants for actions/processes that are under the full control of central parties
Insufficiency of Dispute ProcessThe dispute process essentially provides no remedy and potentially could exacerbate rather than resolve disputes
Materiality of Action/InactionIn a centralised, gross mandatory pool an act or omission of a central party can affect a market participant’s entire revenue stream
Loss of profitEasily calculable financial loss
Mitigating ActionCentral parties can seek and obtain liability insurance
Summary