Mock modular Mathieu moonshine modules...Mock modular Mathieu moonshine modules Miranda C N Cheng1*,...
Transcript of Mock modular Mathieu moonshine modules...Mock modular Mathieu moonshine modules Miranda C N Cheng1*,...
Mock modular Mathieu moonshine modulesMiranda C N Cheng1*, Xi Dong2, John F R Duncan3, Sarah Harrison2, Shamit Kachru2 and Timm Wrase2
1 IntroductionThe investigation of moonshine connecting modular objects, sporadic groups, and 2d conformal field theories has been revitalized in recent years by the discovery of several new classes of examples. While monstrous moonshine [3, 15, 21, 30, 36, 37, 44] remains the best understood and prototypical case, a new class of umbral moonshines tying mock modular forms to automorphism groups of Niemeier lattices has recently been uncovered [13, 14] (cf. also [6]). The best studied example, and the first to be discovered, involves the group M24 and was discovered through the study of the elliptic genus of K3 [35]. The twining functions have been constructed in [4, 31, 38, 39] and were proved to be the graded characters of an infinite-dimensional M24-module in [43]. Steps towards a better and deeper understanding of this mock modular moonshine can be found in [7, 8, 18, 40–42, 46, 56, 57, 59–61], and particularly in [9], where the importance of K3 surface geometry for all cases of umbral moonshine is elucidated. Possible connections to space-time physics in string theory have been discussed in [5, 47–49, 63]. Evidence for a deep connection between monstrous and umbral moonshine has appeared in [25, 55].
Abstract
We construct super vertex operator algebras which lead to modules for moonshine relations connecting the four smaller sporadic simple Mathieu groups with distin-guished mock modular forms. Starting with an orbifold of a free fermion theory, any subgroup of Co0 that fixes a 3-dimensional subspace of its unique non-trivial 24-dimen-sional representation commutes with a certain N = 4 superconformal algebra. Simi-larly, any subgroup of Co0 that fixes a 2-dimensional subspace of the 24-dimensional representation commutes with a certain N = 2 superconformal algebra. Through the decomposition of the corresponding twined partition functions into characters of the N = 4 (resp. N = 2) superconformal algebra, we arrive at mock modular forms which coincide with the graded characters of an infinite-dimensional Z-graded module for the corresponding group. The Mathieu groups are singled out amongst various other possibilities by the moonshine property: requiring the corresponding weak Jacobi forms to have certain asymptotic behaviour near cusps. Our constructions constitute the first examples of explicitly realized modules underlying moonshine phenomena relating mock modular forms to sporadic simple groups. Modules for other groups, including the sporadic groups of McLaughlin and Higman–Sims, are also discussed.
Open Access
© 2015 Cheng et al. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
RESEARCH
Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13 DOI 10.1186/s40687-015-0034-9
*Correspondence: [email protected] 1 Institute of Physics and Korteweg-de Vries Institute for Mathematics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsFull list of author information is available at the end of the article
Page 2 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
In none of these cases, however, has a connection to an underlying conformal field theorya (whose Hilbert space furnishes the underlying module) been established. The goal of this paper is to provide first examples of mock modular moonshine for sporadic simple groups G, where the underlying G-module can be explicitly constructed in the state space of a simple and soluble conformal field theory.
Our starting point is the Conway module sketched in [36], studied in detail in [24], and revisited recently in [27]. The original construction was in terms of a supersymmetric theory of bosons on the E8 root lattice, but this has the drawback of obscuring the true symmetries of the model. In [24], a different formulation of the same theory, as a Z2 orbifold of the theory of 24 free chiral fermions, was introduced. A priori, the theory has a Spin(24) symmetry. However, one can also view this theory as an N = 1 supercon-formal field theory. The choice of N = 1 structure breaks the Spin(24) symmetry to a subgroup. In [24] it was shown that the subgroup preserving the natural choice of N = 1 structure is precisely the Conway group Co0, a double cover of the sporadic group Co1. In [24] it was shown that this action can be used to attach a normalized principal modu-lus (i.e. normalized Hauptmodul) for a genus zero group to every element of Co0.
In this paper, we show that generalizations of the basic strategy of [24, 27] can be used to construct a wide variety of new examples of mock modular moonshine. Instead of choosing an N = 1 superconformal structure, we choose larger extended chiral alge-bras A. The subgroup of Spin(24) that commutes with a given choice can be determined by simple geometric considerations; in the cases of interest to us, it will be a subgroup that preserves point-wise a 2-plane or a 3-plane in the 24 dimensional representation of Co0, or equivalently, a subgroup that acts trivially on two or three of the free fermions in some basis. In the rest of the paper, we will use 24 to denote the unique non-trivial 24-dimensional representation of Co0, and use the term n-plane to refer to a n-dimen-sional subspace in 24.
It is natural to ask about the role in moonshine, or geometry, of n-planes in 24 for other values of n. One of the inspirations for our analysis here is the recent result of Gab-erdiel–Hohenegger–Volpato [40] which indicates the importance of 4-planes in 24 for non-linear K3 sigma models. The relationship between their results and the Co0-module considered here is studied in [25], where connections to umbral moonshine for various higher n are also established. We refer the reader to Sect. 9, or the recent articles [1, 10], for a discussion of the interesting case that n = 1.
In this work we will focus on the cases where A is an N = 4 or N = 2 superconformal algebra, though other possibilities exist. In the first case, we demonstrate that any sub-group of Co0 that preserves a 3-plane in the 24-dimensional representation can stabilise an N = 4 structure. The groups that arise are discussed in e.g. Chapter 10 of the book by Conway and Sloane [16]. They include in particular the Mathieu groups M22 and M11. In the second case, where the group need only fix a 2-plane in order to preserve an N = 2 superconformal algebra, there are again many possibilities (again, see [16]), including the larger Mathieu groups M23 and M12. Note that the larger the superconformal algebra we wish to preserve, the smaller the global symmetry group is. Corresponding to cer-tain specific choices of the N = 0, 1, 2, 4 algebras, we have the global symmetry groups Spin(24) ⊃ Co0 ⊃ M23 ⊃ M22.
Page 3 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
We should stress again that there are other Co0 subgroups that preserve N = 4 resp. N = 2 superconformal algebras arising from 3-planes resp. 2-planes in 24. Some exam-ples are: the group U4(3) for the former case, and the McLaughlin (McL) and Hig-man–Sims (HS) sporadic groups, and also U6(2) for the latter case. However, only for the Mathieu groups do the twined partition functions of the module display uniformly a special property, which we regard as an essential feature of the moonshine phenomena. Namely, all the mock modular forms obtained via twining by elements of the Mathieu groups are encoded in Jacobi forms that are constant in the elliptic variable, in the limit as the modular variable tends to any cusp other than the infinite one. This property also holds for the Jacobi forms of the Mathieu moonshine mentioned above, and may be regarded as a counter-part to the genus zero property of monstrous moonshine, as we explain in more detail in Sect. 8.
The importance of this property is its predictive power: it allows us to write down trace functions for the actions of Mathieu group elements with little more information than a certain fixed multiplier system, and the levels of the functions we expect to find. A priori these are just guesses, but the constructions we present here verify their validity.
This may be compared to the predictive power of the genus zero property of monstrous moonshine: if Ŵ < SL2(R) determines a genus zero quotient of the upper-half plane, and if the stabilizer of i∞ in Ŵ is generated by ±
(1 10 1
), then there is a unique Ŵ-invariant hol-
omorphic function satisfying TŴ(τ) = q−1 + O(q) as τ → i∞, for q = e2π iτ . The miracle of monstrous moonshine, and the content of the moonshine conjectures of Conway–Norton [15], is that for suitable choices of Ŵ, the function TŴ is the trace of an element of the monster on some graded infinite-dimensional module (namely, the moonshine module of [36, 37]). The optimal growth property formulated in [14] plays the analogous predictive role in umbral moonshine, and is similar to the special property we formulate for the Mathieu moonshine considered here.
We mention here that although the moonshine conjectures have been proven in the monstrous case by Borcherds [3], and verified in [7, 28, 43] (see also [6]) for umbral moonshine, conceptual explanations of the genus zero property of monstrous moon-shine, and of the analogous properties of umbral moonshine, and the Mathieu moon-shine studied here, remain to be determined. An approach to establishing the genus zero property of monstrous moonshine via quantum gravity is discussed in [29].
The organization of the paper is as follows. We begin in Sect. 2 with a review of the module discussed in [27]. In Sect. 3, we describe methods for endowing this module with N = 4 and N = 2 structure. In Sect. 4, we discuss what this does to the mani-fest symmetry group of the model, reducing the symmetry from Co0 to a variety of other possible groups which preserve a 3-plane (respectively 2-plane) in the 24 of Co0. In Sects. 4 and 5, we discuss the action of these Co0-subgroups on the mod-ules and compute the corresponding twining functions. We identify M23, M22, McL, HS, U6(2) and U4(3) as some of the most interesting Co0-subgroups preserving some extended superconformal algebra. In Sects. 6 and 7, we discuss in some detail the decomposition of the graded partition function of our chiral conformal field theory into characters of irreducible representations of the N = 4 and N = 2 superconfor-mal algebras. In Sect. 8, we discuss the special property we require from a moon-shine twining function, and show how this property singles out the Mathieu groups
Page 4 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
in our setup. We close with a discussion in Sect. 9. The appendices contain a number of tables: character tables for the various groups we discuss, tables of coefficients of the vector-valued mock modular forms that arise as our twining functions, and tables describing the decompositions of our modules into irreducible representations of the various groups.
2 The free field theoryThe chiral 2d conformal field theory that will play a starring role in this paper has two different constructions. The first is described in [37] and starts with 8 free bosons Xi compactified on the 8-dimensional torus given by the E8 root lattice, together with their Fermi superpartners ψ i. One then orbifolds by the Z2 symmetry
Note that, in more mathematical terms, a chiral 2d conformal field theory can be under-stood to mean a super vertex operator algebra (usually assumed to be simple, and of CFT-type in the sense of [23]), together with a (simple) canonically-twisted module. These two spaces are referred to as the Neveu–Schwarz (NS) and Ramond (R) sectors of the theory, respectively. The compactification of free bosons on the torus defined by a lattice L manifests, in the NS sector, as the usual lattice vertex algebra construction, and their Fermi superpartners are then realized by a Clifford module, or free fermion, super vertex algebra, where the underlying orthogonal space comes equipped with an isometric embedding of L. In the cases under consideration, there is a unique simple canonically-twisted module up to equivalence (cf. e.g. [24]), and hence a unique choice of R sector.
The orbifold procedure is described in detail in the language of vertex algebra in [24]. In what follows, a field of dimension d is a vertex operator or intertwining operator attached to a vector v in the NS or R sector, respectively, with L(0)v = dv. A current is a field of dimension 1. A field is called primary if its corresponding vector is a highest weight for the Virasoro (Lie) algebra. A ground state is an L(0)-eigenvector of minimal eigenvalue.
The E8 construction just described has manifest N = 1 supersymmetry, in the sense that the Neveu–Schwarz and Ramond algebras act naturally on the NS and R sectors, respectively. After orbifolding we obtain a c = 12 theory with no primary fields of dimension 12. The partition functions (i.e., graded dimensions) of this free field theory can easily be computed. For example, the NS sector partition function is given by
where E4 is the weight 4 Eisenstein series, being the theta series of the E8 lattice, η(τ) = q1/24
∏∞n=1(1− qn) is the Dedekind eta function, and θi are the Jacobi theta func-
tions recorded in “Appendix A”. We have also set q = ǫ(τ ) and we use the shorthand notation e(x) = e2π ix throughout this paper.
(2.1)(Xi,ψ i) → (−Xi,−ψ i).
(2.2)ZNS,E8(τ ) =1
2
(E4(τ )θ3(τ , 0)
4
η(τ)12+ 16
θ4(τ , 0)4
θ2(τ , 0)4+ 16
θ2(τ , 0)4
θ4(τ , 0)4
)
(2.3)= q−1/2 + 0+ 276q1/2 + 2048q + 11202q3/2 + · · · ,
Page 5 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
One recognizes representations of the Co1 sporadic group appearing in the q-series (2.3): apart from 276, which is the minimal dimension of a faithful irreducible represen-tation (cf. [31]), one can also observe
In fact, this theory has a Co0 ∼= 2.Co1 symmetry, which we call non-manifest since the action of Co0 is not obvious from the given description. Note that we sometimes use n or Zn to denote Z/nZ depending on the context.
A better realization, for our purposes, was discussed in detail in [28] (cf. also [40]). The E8 orbifold theory is equivalent to a theory of 24 free chiral fermions �1, �2, . . . , �24, also orbifolded by the Z2 symmetry �α → −�α. This gives an alternative description of the Conway module above. The partition function from this “free fermion” point of view is more naturally written as
This is equal to (2.2) according to non-trivial identities satisfied by theta functions. Note that θ1(τ , 0) = 0.
The free fermion theory has a manifest Spin(24) symmetry, but not a manifest N = 1 supersymmetry. However, one can construct an N = 1 supercurrent as follows. There is a unique (up to scale) NS ground state, but there are 212 = 4096 linearly independent Ramond sector ground states, which may be obtained by acting on a given fixed R sector ground state with the fermion zero modes �i(0). It will be convenient to label the result-ing 4096 Ramond sector ground states by vectors s ∈ F
122 , where F2 = {−1/2, 1/2}.
We therefore have 4096 spin fields of dimension 32 which implement the flow from the NS to the R sector. Denoting these fields as Ws, one can try to find a linear combination
which will serve as an N = 1 supercurrent (i.e., field whose modes generate actions of the Neveu–Schwarz and Ramond super Lie algebras). As demonstrated in [28], and as we will review in the next section, there exists a set of values cs such that the operator product expansion of W and the stress tensor T close properly, defining actions of the Neveu–Schwarz and Ramond algebras.
Any choice of W breaks the Spin(24) symmetry, since the Ramond sector ground states split into two 2048-dimensional irreducible representation of Spin(24). It is proven in [28] that the subgroup of Spin(24) that stabilizes a suitably chosen N = 1 supercurrent is exactly the Conway group Co0. In brief, the method of [28] is to identify a certain ele-mentary abelian subgroup of order 212 in Spin(24) (which should be regarded as a copy of the extended Golay code in Spin(24)). The action of this subgroup on the Ramond sector ground states singles out a particular choice of W, with the property that it is not
(2.4)2048 = 1+ 276+ 1771,
(2.5)11202 = 1+ 276+ 299+ 1771+ 8855,
· · ·
(2.6)ZNS,fermion(τ ) =1
2
4∑
i=2
θ12i (τ , 0)
η12(τ ).
(2.7)W =
∑
s∈F122
csWs
Page 6 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
annihilated by the zero mode of any dimension 1 field in the theory. It follows from this (cf. Proposition 4.8 of [28]) that the subgroup of Spin(24) that stabilizes W is a reductive algebraic group of dimension 0, and hence finite. On the other hand, one can show (cf. Proposition 4.7 of [28]) that this group contains Co0, by virtue of the choice of subgroup 212. We obtain that the full stabilizer of W in Spin(24) is Co0 by verifying (cf. Proposition 4.9 of [28]) that Co0 is a maximal subgroup, subject to being finite.
In the rest of this paper, we extend this idea as follows. Instead of choosing an N = 1 supercurrent and viewing the theory as an N = 1 super conformal field theory, we choose various other super extensions of the Virasoro algebra. We will argue that N = 4 and N = 2 superconformal presentations of the theory are in one to one correspond-ence with choices of subgroups of Co0 which fix a 3-plane (respectively, 2-plane) in the 24 dimensional representation. This leads us naturally to theories with various inter-esting symmetry groups, whose twining functions are easily computed in terms of the partition function (or elliptic genus) of the free fermion conformal field theory. These functions in turn are expressed nicely in terms of mock modular forms, and thus we establish mock modular moonshine relations for subgroups of Co0 via this family of modules.
3 The superconformal algebrasWe first discuss the largest superconformal algebra (SCA) we will consider, which gives rise to smaller global symmetry groups. We will construct an N = 4 SCA in the free fermion orbifold theory. Our strategy is to first construct the SU(2) fields, and act with them on an N = 1 supercurrent to generate the full N = 4 SCA. We consequently obtain actions of the N = 2 SCA by virtue of its embeddings in the N = 4 SCA. In this process, we break the Co0 symmetry group down to a proper subgroup as we will discuss in Sect. 4. We refer the reader to [32, 50, 52] for background on the N = 4 and N = 2 superconformal algebras.
We start with 24 real free fermions �1, �2, . . . , �24 . Picking out the first three fermions, we obtain the currents Ji:
They form an affine SU(2) algebra with level 2 as may be seen from their operator prod-uct expansion (OPE),
The next step is to pick an N = 1 supercurrent and act with Ji on it. As we reviewed in Sect. 2, an N = 1 supercurrent exists in this model and may be written as a linear com-bination of spin fields. Moreover, it may be chosen so that its stabilizer in Spin(24) is precisely Co0. We will present a very general version of the construction now, and then extend it to find the N = 4 SCA.
To write the N = 1 supercurrent explicitly, we first group the 24 real fermions into 12 complex ones and bosonize them:
(3.1)Ji = −iǫijk�j�k , i, j, k ∈ {1, 2, 3} .
(3.2)Ji(z)Jj(0) ∼1
z2δij +
i
zǫijk Jk(0) .
Page 7 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
In terms of the bosonic fields H = (H1, . . . ,H12), an N = 1 supercurrent W may be writ-ten as
where each component of s = (s1, s2, . . . , s12) takes the values ±1/2, and the coefficients ws belong to C. We have introduced cocycle operators cs(p) to ensure that the fields with integer spins (i.e., corresponding to even parity vectors) commute with all other operators, and the fields with half integral spins (corresponding to odd parity vectors) anticommute amongst themselves. The cocycle operators depend on the zero-mode operators p which are characterized by the commutation relation
where k = (k1, . . . , k12) is an arbitrary 12-tuple of complex numbers.The associativity and closure of the OPE of the “dressed” vertex operators
requires that
where the ǫ(k, k′) satisfy the 2-cocycle condition
Moreover, in order for Vk to have the desired (anti)commutation relation, the condition
should be imposed. An explicit description of the cocycle for a general vertex operator eik·H may be chosen as
according to [33]. In our case, M is a 12× 12 matrix that has the block form
where 14 is the 4 × 4 matrix with all entries set to 1.Generically, the OPE of W with itself is
(3.3)
ψa ≡ 2−1/2(�2a−1 + i�2a) ∼= e
iHa ,
ψa ≡ 2−1/2(�2a−1 − i�2a) ∼= e
−iHa , a = 1, 2, . . . , 12.
(3.4)W =
∑
s∈F122
wseis·Hcs(p),
(3.5)[p, eik·H
]= keik·H,
(3.6)Vk = eik·Hck(p)
(3.7)ck(p+ k′)ck′(p) = e(k, k′)ck+k′(p),
(3.8)e(k, k′) e(k + k′, k
′′) = e(k′, k′′) ǫ(k, k′ + k′′).
(3.9)e(k, k′) = (−1)k·k′+k2k′2e(k′, k)
(3.10)ck(p) = eiπk·M·p
(3.11)M =
M4 0 014 M4 014 14 M4
, M4 =
0 0 0 01 0 0 01 1 0 0−1 1 − 1 0
,
(3.12)W (z)W (0) ∼ ww
[1
z3+ T (0)
4z
]+ wŴαβγ δw
96z�α�β�γ �δ(0),
Page 8 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
where we have defined
for α < β < γ < δ. The other components of Ŵαβγ δ are defined by the requirement that it is totally antisymmetrized. For W to be an N = 1 supercurrent, the last terms in (3.12) must vanish,
and the first two terms must have the correct normalization,
From now on we presume to be chosen a solution (ws) such that W is an N = 1 super-current stabilized by Co0, as described in Sect. 2.
We may now act with the SU(2) currents Ji on our N = 1 supercurrent W. In order to do this, write the SU(2) currents in (3.1) in bosonized form,
Here we have included the cocycles e±iπp1. We now extract the singular terms of the OPEs,
where Wi are slightly modified combinations of spin fields,
and where Rs ≡ (−s1,−s2, s3, . . . , s12).
(3.13)ws = w−sc−s(s),
(3.14)
Ŵαβγ δ
ss′ =(ŴαŴβŴγ Ŵδ
)ss′c−s(s
′ − s)
(−2s⌈ α
2⌉+1
)· · ·
(−2s⌈ β
2⌉
)(−2s⌈ γ
2⌉+1
)· · ·
(−2s⌈ δ
2⌉
),
(3.15)wŴαβγ δw = 0 , ∀α,β , γ , δ ∈ {1, 2, . . . , 12},
(3.16)ww =
∑
s∈F122
w−swscs(−s) = 8.
(3.17)J1 = −1
2
(eiH1 − e−iH1
)(eiH2eiπp1 + e−iH2e−iπp1
),
(3.18)J2 =i
2
(eiH1 + e−iH1
)(eiH2eiπp1 + e−iH2e−iπp1
),
(3.19)J3 = i∂H1.
(3.20)Ji(z)W (0) ∼ − i
2zWi(0),
(3.21)W1 = −∑
s
2s2wRseis·Hcs(p),
(3.22)W2 = i∑
s
4s1s2wRseis·Hcs(p),
(3.23)W3 = i∑
s
2s1wseis·Hcs(p),
Page 9 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
We claim that all three Wi defined above are valid N = 1 supercurrents. This is because we may obtain, for instance, W3 from W by rotating the 1–2 plane by π, and the conditions (3.15) and (3.16), for being an N = 1 supercurrent, are invariant under SO(24) rotations. We may obtain W2 and W3 similarly. This shows that each of the Wi is an N = 1 supercurrent.
Furthermore, we can check using the identity (3.15) that the OPEs of the Wi are given by
This shows that W, Wi, and Ji, together with the stress tensor T, defined as
form an N = 4 SCA with central charge c = 12. We may recombine the four N = 1 supercurrents W, Wi into the more conventional N = 4 supercurrents
which transform according to the representation 2+ 2 of SU(2). In terms of these super-currents we obtain the standard (small) N = 4 SCA with central charge c = 12, charac-terized by the following set of OPEs:
(3.24)Wi(z)Wj(0) ∼ δij
[8
z3+ 2
zT (0)
]+ 2iǫijk
[2
z2Jk(0)+
1
z∂Jk(0)
],
(3.25)W (z)Wi(0) ∼ −2i
(2
z2+ ∂
z
)Ji(0),
(3.26)Ji(z)Wj(0) ∼i
2z(δijW + ǫijkWk).
(3.27)T = −1
2
∑
α
�α∂�α = −1
2
∑
a
∂Ha∂Ha,
(3.28)W±1 ≡ 2−1/2(W ± iW3) , W±
2 ≡ ±2−1/2i(W1 ± iW2),
(3.29)T (z)T (0) ∼ 6
z4+ 2
z2T (0)+ 1
z∂T (0),
(3.30)T (z)W±a (0) ∼ 3
2z2W±
a (0)+ 1
z∂W±
a (0),
(3.31)T (z)Ji(0) ∼1
z2Ji(0)+
1
z∂Ji(0),
(3.32)W+a (z)W−
b (0) ∼ δab
[8
z3+ 2
zT (0)
]− 2σ i
ab
[2
z2Ji(0)+
1
z∂Ji(0)
],
(3.33)W+a (z)W+
b (0) ∼ W−a (z)W−
b (0) ∼ 0,
(3.34)Ji(z)W+a (0) ∼ − 1
2zσ iabW
+b (0),
(3.35)Ji(z)W
−a (0) ∼ 1
2zσ i∗abW
−b (0),
Page 10 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Here σ i are the Pauli matrices.Now we can generalize our formula for the partition function (2.6) to include a grading
by the U(1) charge under the Cartan generator of the SU(2). The U(1) charge operator J0 is, by definition, twice the zero-mode of the J3 current. From this and the definition J3 = −i�1�2 = ψ1ψ1, we see that under J0 the complex fermion ψ1 has charge 2 while the other 11 complex fermions are neutral. Therefore, the U(1)-graded NS sector partition function becomes
In the above discussion, we have chosen the first three fermions out of a total of 24 to generate a set of SU(2) currents. Together with an N = 1 supercurrent they gen-erate a full N = 4 SCA. It is clear that we are free to choose any three fermions for this purpose. In fact, we could choose an arbitrary three-dimensional subspace of the 24-dimensional vector space spanned by the fermions, and obtain an N = 4 SCA. For a given N = 1 supercurrent, not all choices of 3-plane are equivalent, as we will see in Sect. 4.
Observe that we could instead have chosen to single out only two real fermions, and construct a U(1) current algebra instead of an SU(2) current algebra. Completely analo-gous manipulations then show that each such choice provides an N = 2 superconformal algebra. As a result we can equip the Co0 theory with N = 2 structure in such a way that the global symmetry group is broken to subgroups G of Co0 which stabilize 2-planes in 24.
To summarize the results of this section, we have shown how to construct an N = 1 supercurrent for the chiral conformal field theory described, in the previous section, as an orbifold of 24 free fermions. We have also shown how choices of 2- and 3-planes in the space spanned by the generating fermions give rise to actions of the N = 2 and N = 4 superconformal algebras (respectively) on the theory. As reviewed in Sect. 2, a suitable choice of N = 1 structure reduces the global symmetry of the theory to Co0. In the next section we will discuss the finite simple groups that appear when we impose the richer, N = 2 and N = 4 superconformal structures.
4 Global symmetriesEnhancing the N = 1 structure of the theory to N = 4 breaks the Co0 symmetry. We now show that for a specific choice of 3-plane in 24, resulting in a specific copy of the N = 4 SCA, the stabilising subgroup of Co0 is the sporadic group M22. Similarly, for a specific choice of 2-plane, resulting in a specific copy of the N = 2 SCA, the sta-bilising subgroup of Co0 is the sporadic group M23. This amounts to a proof that the model described in Sect. 2 results in an infinite-dimensional M22 (resp. M23)-module underlying the mock modular forms described in Sect. 6 (resp. Sect. 7) arising from its
(3.36)Ji(z)Jj(0) ∼1
z2δij +
i
zǫijk Jk(0).
(3.37)ZNS(τ , z) =1
2
4∑
i=2
θi(τ , 2z) θi(τ , 0)11
η(τ)12.
Page 11 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
interpretation as an N = 4 (resp. N = 2) module. More generally, we establish the mod-ules for 3- (2-)plane-fixing subgroups of the largest Mathieu group M24 by fixing a spe-cific copy of N = 4 (N = 2) SCA.
Recall that the theory regarded as an N = 0 theory (i.e., with no extension of the Virasoro action) has a Spin(24) symmetry resulting from the SO(24) rotations on the 24-dimensional space, and a suitable choice of N = 1 supercurrent breaks the Spin(24) group down to its subgroup Co0. The group Co0 is the automorphism group of the Leech lattice �Leech, and various interesting subgroups of Co0 can be identified as stabilizers of suitably chosen lattice vectors in �Leech. To study the automorphism group of the mod-ule when fixing more structure—more supersymmetries in this case—it will therefore be useful to describe the enhanced supersymmetries in terms of Leech lattice vectors.
In Chapter 10 of [16] it is shown that if we choose an appropriate tetrahedron in the Leech lattice, whose edges have lengths squared 16× (2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3) in the normali-sation described below, the subgroup of Co0 that leaves all vertices of the tetrahedron invariant is M22. To be more precise, let eγ, for γ ∈ {1, 2, . . . , 24}, be an orthonormal basis of R24, and choose a copy G of the extended binary Golay code in P({1, . . . , 24}). Then we may realize �Leech as the lattice generated by the vectors 2
∑γ∈C eγ for
C ∈ G together with −4e1 +∑24
γ=1 eγ. (One can show that all 24 vectors of the form −4eα +
∑24γ=1 eγ are in �Leech.) Define the tetrahedron T{α,β} to be that whose four verti-
ces are O = 0, Xα = 4eα +∑24
γ=1 eγ, Xβ = 4eβ +∑24
γ=1 eγ and Pαβ = 4eα + 4eβ, for any α,β ∈ {1, 2, . . . , 24} with α �= β. For every such T{α,β}, the subgroup fixing every vertex is a copy of M22, a sporadic simple group of order 27 · 32 · 5 · 7 · 11 = 443, 520 and the subgroup of M24 fixing eα and eβ.
From the above discussion, it is clear that given {α,β}, a copy of M22 stabilises the real span of eα, eβ and
∑24γ=1 eγ. Given a suitable choice of the N = 1 superconformal alge-
bra, this copy of R3 in 24 then determines, up to rotations, the three fermions, denoted �1,2,3, from which the SU(2) current algebra was built in Sect. 3. By definition then, a copy of M22 leaves the N = 4 superconformal algebra invariant.
A natural question is: what is the symmetry group G that fixes a given choice of N = 2 superconformal structure? Given the above description of the M22 action, we can choose the R2 ⊂ R3 generated by eα and
∑24γ=1 eγ and use the two free fermions lying in the R2
to construct the N = 2 sub-algebra of the N = 4 SCA. Specifically, the U(1) action is rotation of the R2. From the above discussion, it is not hard to see that there is a copy of M23 fixing eα and
∑24γ=1 eγ and hence stabilising the N = 2 structure. Recall that M23
is a sporadic simple group of order 27 · 32 · 5 · 7 · 11 · 23 = 10, 200, 960. In terms of the Leech lattice, it corresponds to the fact that the stabiliser of the triangle in �Leech whose edges have lengths squared 16× (6, 3, 2), with vertices chosen to be O, Xα and 2
∑24γ=1 eγ
, is a copy of M23 inside the copy of Co0 stabilising �Leech.This furnishes a proof that the theory described in Sect. 2 leads to modules for M22
and M23 which explicitly realize the mock modular forms to be defined in Sects. 6 and 7.We should mention that by stabilizing different choices of geometric structure, other
than the tetrahedron and triangle just discussed, leading to M22 and M23, respectively, we can determine other global symmetry groups G. Indeed, our method constructs a G-module with N = 4 (N = 2) superconformal symmetry for any subgroup G < Co0
Page 12 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
which fixes a 3-plane (2-plane) in 24. Since, as we will see in Sect. 6 (Sect. 7), such mod-ules furnish assignments of mock modular forms to the elements of their global symme-try groups, it is an interesting question to classify the global symmetry groups G < Co0 that can arise. We conclude this section with a discussion of some of these possibilities. Certainly a full classification is beyond the scope of this work, so we restrict our atten-tion (mostly) to sporadic simple examples.
Indeed, the Conway group Co0 is a rich source of sporadic simple groups, for no less than 12 of the 26 sporadic simple groups are involved in Co0 (cf. [17]), in the sense that they may be obtained by taking quotients of subgroups of Co0. Of these 12, all but 3 are actually realised as subgroups, and 6 of these 9 sporadic simple groups appear as sub-groups of Co0 fixing (at least) a 2-plane in 24. These six 2-plane fixing groups are the smaller Mathieu groups, M23, M22, M12 and M11, the Higman–Sims group HS, and the McLaughlin group McL. Some 2-planes they fix are described explicitly in Chapter 10 of [16].N = 4 modulesFrom the character tables (cf. [17]) of the six sporadic 2-plane fixing subgroups of Co0
it is clear that M22 and M11 are the only examples that fix a 3-plane. Even though M11 is not a subgroup of M22, it turns out that the mock modular forms attached to M11 by our N = 4 construction (and the analysis of Sect. 6) are a proper subset of those attached to M22, since the conjugacy classes of Co0 appearing in a 3-plane-fixing subgroup M11 are a proper subset of those appearing in a subgroup M22. For this reason we focus on M22 when discussing mock modular forms attached to sporadic simple groups via the N = 4 construction in this work.
If we expand our attention to simple, not necessarily sporadic subgroups of Co0, then there is one example which is larger than M22 (which has order 443,520). Namely, the group U4(3), with order 3,265,920, can arise as the stabilizer of a suitably chosen 3-plane in the 24 of Co0 [16]. The U4(3) characters are presented in Appendix Table 20, the coefficients in the associated (twined) vector valued mock modular forms in Appendix Tables 3 and 4, and the decomposition of the module into irreducible representations of the group in Appendix Tables 26 and 27.
As we shall see in Sect. 8, the Jacobi forms attached to M22 (and therefore also those attached to M11) by the N = 4 construction are distinguished in that they satisfy a nat-ural analogue of the genus zero condition of monstrous moonshine. By contrast, this property does not hold for all the Jacobi forms arising from U4(3). This is the main rea-son for our focus on M22 in the context of N = 4 supersymmetry (Appendix Tables 1, 2, 5, 6, 15).N = 2 modulesWe have focused on the example of M23, with order 10,200,960, in this section. Since
M22 and M11 are subgroups of M23 we do not consider them further in the context of N = 2 structures. Of the remaining sporadic simple 2-plane-fixing subgroups of Co0, the largest is the McLaughlin group McL, which is actually considerably larger than M23, having order 898,128,000. Its characters are presented in Appendix Table 21, the coefficients of the (twined) mock modular forms in Appendix Tables 7 and 8, and the decomposition of the module into irreducible representations of the group in Appendix Tables 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38.
Page 13 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
The next largest example, also larger than M23, is the Higman–Sims group HS, with order 44,352,000. Its characters are presented in Appendix Table 22, the coefficients of the (twined) mock modular forms in Appendix Tables 9 and 10, and the decomposition of the module into irreducible representations of the group in Appendix Tables 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44.
If we expand our attention to simple groups fixing a 2-plane in 24 then there is one example larger than McL. Namely, the group U6(2), of order 9,196,830,720, fixes any tri-angle in 24 whose three sides are vectors of minimal length in the Leech lattice. The characters of U6(2) are given in Appendix Tables 17, 18, 19, the coefficients of the (twined) mock modular forms in Appendix Tables 11, 12, 13, 14, and the decomposition of the module into irreducible representations of the group in Appendix Tables 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54.
In direct analogy with the case of N = 4 structure, it will develop in Sect. 8 that the Jacobi forms attached to M12 and M23 satisfy a natural analogue of the genus zero condi-tion of monstrous moonshine, and, contrastingly, this property fails in general for the modular forms arising from the other, non-Mathieu, 2-plane-fixing simple groups men-tioned above. For these reasons, and since M12 is relatively small, we focus on M23 in our discussion of N = 2 supersymmetry.
5 Twining the moduleIn the last sections, we have described how to equip the orbifolded free fermion the-ory with N = 4 and N = 2 superconformal structures. In this section we will use the Ramond sector of our theory to attach two variable formal power series—the g-twined graded R sector partition function, cf. (5.10)—to each element g ∈ Co0 that preserves at least a 2-plane in 24.
Let us denote the Ramond sector by V, and let us choose a U(1) charge operator J0. This will be twice the Cartan generator of the SU(2) in the N = 4 case, or the single U(1) generator in the case of N = 2 SCA. Then it is natural to define the Ramond-sector U(1)-graded partition function, or elliptic genus,
where we have introduced a chemical potential for the J0 charges and set y = e(z) for z ∈ C. Also, we define (−1)F as an operator on V by requiring that it act as Id on the untwisted free fermion contribution to V, and as −Id on the twisted fermion contribution.
As is expected for 2d conformal field theories with N ≥ 2 supersymmetry, the elliptic genus (5.1) transforms as a Jacobi form of weight 0, index m = c
6 and level 1.
(5.1)Z(τ , z) = T rV (−1)FqL0−c/24yJ0
(5.2)= 1
2
1
η12(τ )
4∑
i=2
(−1)i+1θi(τ , 2z)θ11i (τ , 0)
(5.3)= 1
2
E4(τ )θ41 (τ , z)
η12(τ )+ 8
4∑
i=2
(θi(τ , z)
θi(τ , 0)
)4
,
Page 14 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Explicitly, and since c = 12 in our case, this means that Z|2(�,µ) = Z for all �,µ ∈ Z, and Z|0,2γ = Z for all γ ∈ SL2(Z), where the elliptic and modular slash operators are defined by
respectively, for �,µ ∈ Z and γ =(a bc d
)∈ SL2(Z). (A Jacobi form of level N is only
required to satisfy φ|k ,mγ = φ for γ in the congruence subgroup Ŵ0(N ) (cf. (6.24)).)As we have seen in Sect. 2, the two different ways of writing this function, (5.2) and
(5.3), are intuitively connected more closely with the free fermion and E8 root lattice descriptions of the theory, respectively. Of course, the U(1)-graded NS sector partition function (3.37) is related to the above, graded Ramond sector partition function by a spectral flow transformation
There is a natural way in which one can twine the above function under certain sub-groups of Co0. From the previous discussions, we see that the representation 24 plays a central role in the way various subgroups of Co0 act on the model. Let’s denote by ℓg ,k and ℓg ,k, for k = 1, . . . 12, the 12 complex conjugate pairs of eigenvalues of g ∈ Co0 when acting on 24. This information is conveniently encoded in the so-called Frame shape of g, given by
satisfying ∑
n Lnmn = 24, through the fact that the 12 pairs {ℓg ,k , ℓg ,k} are precisely the 24 roots solving the equation
As discussed in Sects. 3 and 4, in order to preserve at least N = 2 superconformal symmetry and hence be able to twine the graded R-sector partition function (5.1), the subgroup G must leave at least a 2-dimensional subspace in 24 pointwise invariant. In the graded partition function this corresponds to leaving the factor θi(τ , 2z) in (5.2) invariant. As a result, for every conjugacy class [g] of such a group G we can choose ℓg ,1 = ℓg ,1 = 1. It is easy to see that when acting on the untwisted free fermions of the theory, contributing the terms involving θi with i = 3, 4 in (5.2), the group element g sim-ply replaces θ11i (τ , 0) with
where e(ρg ,k) = ℓg ,k.
(5.4)(φ|m(�,µ))(τ , z) = e(m(�2τ + 2�z))φ(τ , z + �τ + µ),
(φ|k ,mγ )(τ , z) = e(−m cz2
cτ+d)(cτ + d)−kφ
(aτ+bcτ+d
, zcτ+d
),
(5.5)ZNS(τ , z) = q1/2y−2Z(τ , z − τ+12 ).
�g =∏
n
Lnmn , 1 ≤ L1 < L2 < L3 · · · , and mn ∈ Z,mn �= 0,
∏
n
(xLn − 1)mn = 0.
(5.6)12∏
k=2
θi(τ , ρg ,k)
Page 15 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
When trying to do the same for the contribution from the twisted fermions, contribut-ing the term involving θ2 in (5.2), however, we see that the above simple consideration suffers from an ambiguity. This can be seen from the fact that θ2(τ , ρ) = −θ2(τ , ρ + 1), and hence the answer cannot be determined simply by looking at the g-eigenvalues on 24. This of course is a reflection of the fact that the global symmetry group, with no superconformal structure imposed, is Spin(24), which is a 2-fold cover of SO(24). As a result, to specify the twining of the twisted fermion contribution, we also need to know the action of G on the faithful 212-dimensional representation of Spin(24) spanned by Ramond sector ground states in the free fermion theory (cf. Sect. 2), henceforth denoted 4096, which decomposes as 4096 = 1+ 276+ 1771+ 24 + 2024 in terms of the irre-ducible representations of Co0.
Note that, according to the orbifold construction, just “half” of the Ramond sec-tor ground states in the free fermion theory will contribute to the Ramond sector V of the orbifold theory under consideration. In terms of the Co0 action, the two “halves” are 24 + 2024, where Co0 acts faithfully, and 1+ 276+ 1771, where the action factors through Co1 = Co0/2. In practice, both choices give rise to equivalent theories (i.e., iso-morphic super vertex operator algebras, cf. [24, 27]), but they are inequivalent as Co0-modules. For us, the ground states represented by 24 + 2024 lie in the R sector, V, and the 1 in 1+ 276+ 1771 represents the Co0-invariant N = 1 supercurrent in the NS sec-tor of our orbifold theory.
The above discussion serves to remind us that there is, really, a vanishing term
in (5.2), which, for certain g ∈ Co0, will make a non-vanishing contribution to the g-twined version of (5.1). It vanishes when g = e is the identity because the Ramond sec-tor ground states in the free fermion theory come in pairs with opposite eigenvalues for (−1)F. Moreover, exchanging the pair corresponds to complex conjugation ψa ↔ ψa, for a = 1, . . . , 12, of the complex fermions. Recall that one of the complex fermions, denoted ψ1 in (3.19), was used to construct the U(1) charge operator J0, and we are inter-ested in the graded partition function where we introduce a chemical potential z for this operator. Because exchanging ψ1 ↔ ψ1 also induces a flip of U(1) charges, captured by z ↔ −z, the contribution of the first complex fermion does not vanish, corresponding to the fact that the identity
only forces θ1(τ , z) to vanish at z ∈ Z. Consequently, the g-twining of (5.7) makes a non-zero contribution to the g-twining of (5.2) if and only if ρg ,k �∈ Z for all k = 2, . . . , 12. In other words, it is non-zero only when the cyclic group generated by g fixes nothing but a 2-plane.
By inspection we find that, among the groups we consider, such group elements must be in the conjugacy classes 23AB ⊂ M23, 6AB, 12AB, 12DE, 18AB ⊂ U6(2), 15AB, 30AB ⊂ McL, or 20AB ⊂HS. The pairs of these conjugacy classes corresponding to the letters A and B (or D and E) are mutually inverse, and so their respective traces,
(5.7)0 = 1
2
1
η12(τ )θ1(τ , 2z)θ
111 (τ , 0)
(5.8)θ1(τ , z) = θ1(τ , z + 2) = −θ1(τ ,−z)
Page 16 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
on any representation, are related by complex conjugation. In terms of our construction, choosing one over the other is the same as choosing what one labels ψ1 and ψ1, and the same as choosing an orientation on the 2-plane fixed by the group element in 24. As a result, from (5.8) we see that the θ1 term in the partition functions twined by these con-jugate A (D) and B (E) classes come with an opposite sign.
Let us work with the principal branch of the logarithm, and choose ρg ,k ∈ [0, 1/2] in (5.6). Then, by direct computation—we must compute directly, for the choice of labels for mutually inverse conjugacy classes is not natural—we find that the signs in (5.10) are
and ǫg ,1 = −1 for the inverse classes, 23B ⊂ M23, 20B ⊂ HS,&c.Putting these different contributions together, we conclude that for every [g] ⊂ G
where G is a subgroup of Co0 preserving (at least) a 2-plane in 24, the corresponding g-twined U(1)-graded R sector partition function reads
where
and where the ǫg ,1 are as determined in the preceding paragraph.In this section we have introduced the g-twined U(1)-graded Ramond sector partition
function, or g-twined elliptic genus of our theory, Zg, for any g ∈ Co0 fixing a 2-plane in 24. We have also derived an explicit formula (5.10) for Zg, in terms of the Frame shapes �g and values T r4096g. This Frame shape and trace value data is collected, for g ∈ G, for various G ⊂ Co0, in “Appendix B”. In Sects. 6 and 7 we will see how the above twin-ing leads to the mock modular forms playing the role of the McKay–Thompson series in these new examples of mock modular moonshine.
6 The N = 4 decompositionsFrom the discussion in Sect. 3 it is clear that the orbifold theory discussed in Sect. 2 can be equipped with N = 4 superconformal structure. In this section we will study the decomposition of the Ramond sector V into irreducible representations of the N = 4
(5.9)lǫg ,1 = 1 for g in
23A ⊂ M23,20A ⊂ HS,15A ∪ 30A ⊂ McL,12A ∪ 12D ∪ 6B ∪ 18B ⊂ U6(2),
(5.10)Zg (τ , z) = T rV g(−1)FqL0−c/24yJ0
(5.11)= 1
2
1
η(τ)12
4∑
i=1
(−1)i+1ǫg ,i θi(τ , 2z)
12∏
k=2
θi(τ , ρg ,k),
(5.12)ǫg ,2 ={
T r4096g
212∏12
k=1 cos(πρg ,k )∈ {−1, 1} when
∏12k=1 cos(πρg ,k) �= 0
0 when∏12
k=1 cos(πρg ,k) = 0
(5.13)ǫg ,3 = ǫg ,4 = 1,
Page 17 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
SCA and see how the decomposition leads to mock modular forms relevant for the M22 moonshine which we will discuss in Sect. 8.
Recall (cf. [32]) that the N = 4 superconformal algebra contains subalgebras isomor-phic to the affine SU(2) and Virasoro Lie algebras. In a unitary representation the former of these acts with level m− 1, for some integer m > 1, and the latter with central charge c = 6(m− 1).
The unitary irreducible highest weight representations vN=4m;h,j are labeled by the
eigenvalues of L0 and 12 J30 acting on the highest weight state, which we denote by h
and j, respectively. Cf. [33, 34]. The superconformal algebra has two types of high-est weight Ramond sector representations: the massless (or BPS) representations with h = c
24 = m−14 and j ∈ {0, 12 , . . . ,
m−12 }, and the massive (or non-BPS) representations
with h > m−14 and j ∈ { 12 , 1, . . . ,
m−12 }. Their graded characters, defined as
are given by
and
in the massless and massive cases, respectively, [34]. In the above formulas, the function µm;j(τ , z) is defined by setting
and �1,1 is a meromorphic Jacobi form (cf. Sect. 8 of [19] for more on meromorphic Jacobi forms) of weight 1 and index 1 given by
Finally, we have used the theta functions
defined for all 2m ∈ Z>0 and r −m ∈ Z, and satisfying
Note that the vector-valued theta function θm = (θm,r), r −m ∈ Z/2mZ, is a vector-val-ued Jacobi form of weight 1/2 and index m satisfying
(6.1)chN=4m;h,j (τ , z) = trvN=4
m;h,j
((−1)J
30 yJ
30 qL0−c/24
),
(6.2)chN=4m;h,j (τ , z) = (�1,1(τ , z))
−1µm;j(τ , z)
(6.3)chN=4m;h,j (τ , z) = (�1,1(τ , z))
−1 qh−c24−
j2
m(θm,2j(τ , z)− θm,−2j(τ , z)
)
(6.4)µm;j(τ , z) = (−1)1+2j∑
k∈Zqmk2y2mk (yq
k)−2j + (yqk)−2j+1 + · · · + (yqk)1+2j
1− yqk,
(6.5)�1,1(τ , z) = −iθ1(τ , 2z) η(τ )
3
(θ1(τ , z))2= y+ 1
y− 1− (y2 − y−2)q + · · · .
(6.6)θm,r(τ , z) =∑
k=r (mod 2m)
e( k2 ) qk2/4myk ,
θm,r(τ , z) = θm,r+2m(τ , z) = e(m) θm,−r(τ ,−z).
Page 18 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
where the Sθ and Tθ matrices are 2m× 2m matrices with entries
We will take m ∈ Z for the rest of this section. When we consider N = 2 decomposi-tions in the next section, we will use the theta function with half-integral indices.
From the above discussion, it is clear that the graded partition function of a module for the c = 6(m− 1) N = 4 SCA admits the following decomposition
Furthermore, from the identity
we arrive at
where
The rest of the components of F (m) = (F(m)r ), r ∈ Z/2mZ, are defined by setting
(6.7)
θm(τ , z) =√
1
2m
√i
τe(−m
τz2)Sθ .θm(− 1
τ, zτ)
= Tθ .θm(τ + 1, z)
= θm(τ , z + 1) = e(m(τ + 2z + 1))θm(τ , z + τ ),
(6.8)(Sθ )r,r′ = e( rr′
2m )e(−r+r′2 ), (Tθ )r,r′ = e(− r2
4m ) δr,r′ .
(6.9)ZN=4,m =
∑
n≥0,0≤r≤m−1r �=0 when n>0
c′r(n− r2
4m ) chN=4m;m−1
4 +n, r2(τ , z).
µm; r2 = (−1)r(r + 1)µm;0 + (−1)n−1r∑
n=1
n q−(r−n+1)2
4m (θm,r−n+1 − θm,−(r−n+1))
(6.10)ZN=4,m = (�1,1(τ , z))−1
c0 µm;0(τ , z)+
�
r∈Z/2mZ
F (m)r (τ ) θm,r(τ , z)
,
(6.11)F (m)r (τ ) =
∞∑
n=0
cr
(n− r2
4m
)qn−
r2
4m , 1 ≤ r ≤ m− 1,
(6.12)c0 =m−1∑
r=0
(−1)r (r + 1) c′r(− r2
4m
),
(6.13)cr
�n− r2
4m
�=
�m−1r′=r (−1)r
′−r(r′ + 1− r) c′r′�− r′2
4m
�, n = 0
c′r�n− r2
4m
�, n > 0.
(6.14)F (m)r (τ ) = −F
(m)−r (τ ) = F
(m)r+2m(τ ).
Page 19 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Recall that µm;0(τ , z) = −f(m)0 (τ , z)+ f
(m)0 (τ ,−z), a specialisation of the Appell–Lerch
sum
studied in [64], has the following relation to the modular group SL2(Z): let the (non-holomorphic) completion of µm;0(τ , z) be
Then µm;0 transforms like a Jacobi form of weight 1 and index m for SL2(Z)⋉ Z2. Here Sm = (Sm,r) is the vector-valued cusp form for SL2(Z) whose components are given by the unary theta functions
For later use, note that the theta series Sm,r(τ ) is defined for all 2m ∈ Z and r −m ∈ Z/2mZ.
The way in which the functions Z(m) and µm;0 transform under the Jacobi group shows that the non-holomorphic function
∑r∈Z/2mZ
F(m)r (τ ) θm,r(τ , z) transforms as a Jacobi
form of weight 1 and index m under SL2(Z)⋉ Z2, where
In other words, F (m) = (F(m)r ), r ∈ Z/2mZ is a vector-valued mock modular form with a
vector-valued shadow c0 Sm, whose r-th component is given by Sm,r(τ ), with the multi-plier for SL2(Z) given by the inverse of the multiplier system of Sm (cf. (6.8)).
Now we are ready to apply the above discussion to the U(1)-graded Ramond sector partition function of the theory, discussed in Sect. 5. Recall that in this case we have c = 12, so m = 3 in (6.2) and (6.3). The N = 4 decomposition of (5.1) gives
(6.15)f (m)u (τ , z) =
∑
k∈Z
qmk2y2mk
1− yqke(−u)
(6.16)
µm;0(τ , τ , z) = µm;0(τ , z)− e
(− 1
8
)1√2m
×∑
r∈Z/2mZ
θm,r(τ , z)
∫i∞
−τ
(τ ′ + τ )−1/2Sm,r(−τ ′) dτ ′ .
Sm,r(τ ) =∑
k=r (mod 2m)
e(k2
)k qk
2/4m = 1
2π i
∂
∂zθm,r(τ , z)|z=0.
F (m)r (τ ) = F (m)
r (τ )+ c0e(− 1
8
) 1√2m
∫ i∞
−τ
(τ ′ + τ )−1/2Sm,r(−τ ′) dτ ′.
(6.17)
Z(τ , z) = 21 chN=4
3; 12,0+ ch
N=4
3; 12,1+
(560 ch
N=4
3; 32, 12
+ 8470 chN=4
3; 52, 12
+ 70576 chN=4
3; 72, 12
+ · · ·
)
+
(210 ch
N=4
3; 32,1+ 4444 ch
N=4
3; 52,1+ 42560 ch
N=4
3; 72,1+ · · ·
)
(6.18)= (�1,1(τ , z))−1
24µ3;0(τ , z)+
�
r∈Z/6Zhr(τ )θ3,r(τ , z)
Page 20 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
where . . . stand for terms with expansion �−11,1 q
αyβ with α − β2/12 > 3. More Fou-rier coefficients of the functions hr(τ ) are recorded in “Appendix C”, where h = hg for [g] = 1A. Note that all the graded multiplicities c′r(n− r2
12 ) appear to be non-negative. Of course, this is guaranteed by the fact that V is a module for the N = 4 SCA as shown in Sect. 3. In particular, the Fourier coefficients of hr(τ ) appear to be all non-negative apart from that of the polar term −2q−1/12 in h1.
From the above discussion we see that h = (hr), for r ∈ Z/6Z, is a weight 1/2 vector-valued mock modular form for SL2(Z) with 6 components (but just 2 linearly independ-ent components, since h0 = h3 = 0, h−1 = −h1, and h−2 = −h2), with shadow given by 24 S3, and multiplier system inverse to that of S3.
This is to be contrasted with the elliptic genus of a generic non-chiral super conformal field theory. For example, the sigma model of a K3 surface has c = 6, and the elliptic genus is given by
where . . . stand for terms with expansion �−11,1 q
αyβ with α − β2/8 > 3. In this case, the coefficient multiplying the massless character chN=4
2; 14 ,12 is negative, arising from the Witten
index of the right-moving massless multiplets paired with the representation vN=42; 14 ,
12
of the left-moving N = 4 SCA.
In Sect. 3 we have shown that the theory under consideration, as a module for the N = 4 SCA, admits a faithful action via automorphisms by a group G, as long as G is a subgroup of Co0 fixing at least a 3-plane. For any such g ∈ G, the g-twined graded parti-tion function Zg (τ , z) is given by (5.10), and from the fact that the action of g commutes with the N = 4 SCA, we expect Zg (τ , z) to admit a decomposition
Moreover, the coefficients of
must be characters of the G-module
(6.19)
EG(τ , z;K3) = TrHRR(−1)FL+FRy
J0qL0−c/24
qL0−c/24
= 20 chN=4
2; 14,0− 2 ch
N=4
2; 14, 12
+(90 ch
N=4
2; 54, 12
+ 462 chN=4
2; 94, 12
+ 1540 chN=4
2; 134, 12
+ · · ·)
(6.20)= (�1,1(τ , z))
−1{24µ2;0(τ , z)+ (θ2,1(τ , z)− θ2,−1(τ , z))
× (−2q−1/8 + 90q7/8 + 462q15/8 + 1540q23/8 + · · · )},
(6.21)Zg (τ , z) = (�1,1(τ , z))−1
(Tr24g) µ3;0(τ , z)+
�
r∈Z/6Zhg ,r(τ )θ3,r(τ , z)
.
(6.22)hg ,r(τ ) = arq−r2/12 +
∞∑
n=1
(TrVGr,ng) qn−r2/12
(6.23)VG =⊕
r=1,2
∞⊕
n=1
VGr,n
Page 21 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
arising from the orbifold theory discussed in Sect. 2.Indeed, the multiplicities of the N = 4 multiplets in the decomposition (6.17) are sug-
gestive of the following group theoretic interpretationb: the 21 h = 1/2, j = 0 massless representations transform as the 21-dimensional irreducible representation of M22, and similarly, the 560 h = 3/2, j = 1/2 massive representations transform as χ10 + χ11 (see “Appendix B”), or “280+ 280”, under M22, etc.
We have explicitly computed the first 30 or so coefficients of each q-series hg ,r(τ ) for all conjugacy classes [g] of G, for G = M22 and G = U4(3). These can be found in the tables in “Appendix C”. Subsequently, we compute the first 30 or so G-modules VG
r,n in terms of their decompositions into irreducible representations. They can be found in the tables in “Appendix D”.
Finally we would like to discuss the mock modular property of the functions hg = (hg ,r). Recall that the Hecke congruence subgroups of SL2(Z) are defined as
We expect Zg to be a weak Jacobi form of weight zero and index 2 (possibly with multi-plier) for the group Ŵ0(og )⋉ Z2, where og is the order of the group element g ∈ G. This can be verified explicitly from the expression (5.10). Repeating the similar arguments as above, we conclude that each vector-valued function hg is a vector-valued mock modular form of weight 1/2 with shadow (Tr24g)S3 for the congruence subgroup Ŵ0(og ). Note that (Tr24g) �= 0 for all g ∈ M22 which are the cases of our main interest. For these cases the multiplier of hg is again given by the inverse of the multiplier system of S3, now restricted to Ŵ0(og ).
In this section we have analyzed the decomposition of the Ramond sector of our orbi-fold theory into irreducible modules for the N = 4 SCA, and we have demonstrated that the generating functions of irreducible N = 4 SCA module multiplicities furnish a vector-valued mock modular form. We have also demonstrated that these multiplici-ties are dimensions of modules for subgroups G < Co0 that point-wise fix a 3-plane in 24, and we have analyzed the modularity of the resulting, g-twined multiplicity generat-ing functions, for g ∈ G. We have verified that each such g-twining results in a vector-valued mock modular form with a specified shadow function. In the next section we will present directly analogous considerations for N = 2 superconformal structures arising from 2-planes in 24.
7 The N = 2 decompositionsAs discussed in Sect. 4, the theory presented in Sect. 2 can be regarded as a module for an N = 2 SCA as well as for an N = 4 SCA. Moreover, for every subgroup G < Co0 fixing a 2-plane there is an N = 2 SCA commuting with the action of G on the theory. As a result, and as we will now demonstrate, the decomposition of the partition func-tion (5.10) twined by elements of G into N = 2 characters leads to sets of vector-valued mock modular forms, now of weight 1 / 2 and index 3 / 2, which are the graded charac-ters of an infinite-dimensional G-module inherited from the Co0-module structure on V (cf. Sect. 5).
(6.24)Ŵ0(N ) ={(
a bc d
)∈ SL2(Z) | c=0 mod N
}.
Page 22 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
To see what these (vector-valued) mock modular forms hg = (hg ,j) are, let us start by recalling the characters of the irreducible representations of the N = 2 SCA. For the SCA with central charge c = 3(2ℓ+ 1) = 3c, the unitary irreducible high-est weight representations vN=2
ℓ;h,Q are labeled by the two quantum numbers h and Q which are the eigenvalues of L0 and J0, respectively, when acting on the highest weight state [22, 51]. Just as in the N = 4 case, there are two types of Ramond sector high-est weight representations: the massless (or BPS) representations with h = c
24 = c8 and
Q ∈ {− c2 + 1,− c
2 + 2, . . . , c2 − 1, c2 }, and the massive (or non-BPS) representations with h > c
8 and Q ∈ {− c2 + 1,− c
2 + 2, . . . , c2 − 2, c2 − 1, c2 }, Q �= 0. From now on we will con-centrate on the case when ℓ is half-integral, and hence c and c are even.
The graded characters, defined as
are given by
for the massive representations, and
for the massless representations (with Q �= c2). The character chN=2
ℓ;c/24,Q(τ , z) for Q = c2
is given in (7.5). In the above formula, we have used the Appell–Lerch sum (6.15) and defined
Note that the above characters transform according to the rule
under charge conjugation.From the relation between the massless and massive characters
(7.1)chN=2ℓ;h,Q(τ , z) = trvN=2
ℓ;h,Q
((−1)J
30 yJ
30 qL0−c/24
),
(7.2)chN=2
ℓ;h,Q(τ , z) = e( ℓ2 )(�1,− 12(τ , z))−1qh−
c24−
j2
4ℓ θℓ,j(τ , z),
j = sgn(Q) (|Q| − 1/2),
(7.3)ch
N=2ℓ;c/24,Q(τ , z) = e
(ℓ+Q+1/2
2
)(�
1,− 12
(τ , z))−1 yQ+ 12 f (ℓ)u (τ , z + u),
u = 12+ (1+2Q)τ
4ℓ,
�1,− 12= −i
η(τ)3
θ1(τ , z)= 1
y1/2 − y−1/2+ q (y1/2 − y−1/2)+O(q2).
chN=2ℓ;c/24,Q(τ , z) = chN=2
ℓ;c/24,−Q(τ ,−z)
(7.4)
chN=2ℓ;c/24,Q + chN=2
ℓ;c/24,−Q = q−n|Q|−1∑
k=0
(−1)k(chN=2
ℓ,n+c/24,Q−k + chN=2ℓ,n+c/24,k−Q
)
+ 2(−1)QchN=2ℓ;c/24,0, n > 0, |Q| ≤ ℓ,
(7.5)
chN=2
ℓ;c/24, c2= q−n
chN=2
ℓ;n+c/24, c2+
c2−1�
k=1
(−1)k�chN=2
ℓ,n+c/24, c2−k+ chN=2
ℓ,n+c/24,k− c2
�
+ (−1)c2 chN=2
ℓ;c/24,0,
Page 23 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
as well as the charge conjugation symmetry of the theory, we expect the U(1)-graded Ramond sector partition function of a theory that is invariant under charge conjugation to admit a decomposition
when the N = 2 SCA has even central charge, c = 3(2ℓ+ 1). In the last equation, we have defined
and
Similar to the case of massless N = 4 characters, through its relation to the Appell–Lerch sum, µℓ;0 admits a completion which transforms as a weight one, half-integral index Jac-obi form under the Jacobi group. More precisely, define µℓ;0 by replacing µm;0 with µℓ;0 and the integer m with the half-integral ℓ in (6.16). Then µℓ;0 transforms like a Jacobi form of weight 1 and index ℓ under the group SL2(Z)⋉ Z2. Following the same computation as in the previous section, we hence conclude that F (ℓ) = (F
(ℓ)j ), where j − 1/2 ∈ Z/2ℓZ, is
a vector-valued mock modular form with a vector-valued shadow C0 Sℓ = C0(Sℓ,j(τ )).Now we are ready to apply the above discussion to the U(1)-graded R sector partition
function of the orbifold theory of Sect. 2. The N = 2 decomposition gives
(7.6)
ZN=2,ℓ = C
′0 ch
N=2ℓ; c
24,0(τ , z)+
∑
n≥0
C′ℓ
(n− ℓ
4
)ch
N=2
ℓ; c
24+n,ℓ+ 1
2
(τ , z) < error−
+∑
n≥0,j∈{ 12, 32,...,ℓ−1}
C′j
(n− j
2
4ℓ
)(ch
N=2
ℓ; c
24+n,j+ 1
2
(τ , z)+ chN=2
ℓ; c
24+n,−
(j+ 1
2
)(τ , z)
)
(7.7)= e�ℓ2
�(�1,− 1
2)−1
C0 µℓ;0(τ , z)+
�
j−ℓ∈Z/2ℓZF(ℓ)j (τ )θℓ,j(τ , z)
µℓ;0 = e( 14 ) y1/2f (ℓ)u (τ ,u+ z), u = 1
2+ τ
4ℓ,
(7.8)F(ℓ)j (τ ) = F
(ℓ)−j (τ ) = F
(ℓ)j+2ℓ(τ ) =
∑
n≥0
Cj
(n− j2
4ℓ
)qn−
j2
4ℓ ,
(7.9)C0 = C ′0 + 2
∑
j∈{ 12 ,32 ,...,ℓ}
(−1)j+12C ′
j
(− j2
4ℓ
),
(7.10)Cj
�n− j2
4ℓ
�=
�ℓ−jk=0(−1)kC ′
j+k
�− (j+k)2
4ℓ
�n = 0
C ′j
�n− j2
4ℓ
�n > 0.
(7.11)
Z(τ , z) = 23 chN=232; 12,0+ ch
N=232; 12,2+
(770
(ch
N=232; 32,1+ ch
N=232; 32,−1
)
+13915
(ch
N=232; 52,1+ ch
N=232; 52,−1
)+ · · ·
)
+(231 ch
N=232; 32,2+ 5796 ch
N=232; 52,2+ . . .
)
Page 24 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
where . . . denote the terms with expansion �−1
1,− 12
qαyβ with α − β2/6 > 2. Again, we observe that all the multiplicities of the representations with characters chN=2
32 ;h,Q
appear to be non-negative, consistent with our construction of V as an N = 2 SCA module.
In general, from the previous sections we have seen that the graded partition func-tion twined by any element g of a subgroup G of Co0 should admit a decomposition into N = 2 characters. We write
Moreover, from the discussion in Sect. 2 we have seen that
and the coefficients of these functions
are given by characters of a G-module
which descends from the orbifold theory in Sect. 2. In particular, for any n, the G-mod-ule V G
−1/2,n is the dual of V G1/2,n. From the above discussion, we conclude that hg = (hg ,j)
is a vector-valued mock modular form for Ŵ0(og ) with shadow (Tr24g)S3/2. Recall that (Tr24g) �= 0 for all g ∈ M22 which are the cases of our main interest. For these case the multiplier of hg is given by the inverse of the multiplier system of S3/2, restricted to Ŵ0(og ).
To summarize, we have analyzed the decomposition of the Ramond sector of our orbi-fold theory into irreducible modules for the N = 2 SCA in this section, and we have demonstrated that the generating functions of irreducible N = 2 SCA module multi-plicities also furnish a vector-valued mock modular form. We have demonstrated that these multiplicities are dimensions of modules for subgroups G < Co0 that point-wise fix a 2-plane in 24, and we have observed that the resulting, g-twined multiplicity gen-erating functions, for g ∈ G, are vector-valued mock modular forms with a certain extra symmetry, relating the components labelled by ±1/2 by complex conjugation.
8 Mathieu moonshineIn the previous sections we have seen that the orbifold theory described in Sect. 2 leads to infinite-dimensional G-modules underlying a set of vector-valued mock modular
(7.12)
= e(34
)�−1
1,− 12
(24 µ 3
2 ;0+
(−q−
124 + 770 q
2324 + 13915 q
4724 + c . . .
)(θ 32 ,
12+ θ 3
2 ,−12
)
+ (q−38 + 231 q
58 + 5796q
138 + · · · ) θ 3
2 ,32
)
(7.13)Zg (τ , z) = e( 34 )�−1
1,− 12
(Tr24g) µ 3
2 ;0(τ , z)+
�
j∈{1/2,−1/2,3/2}hg ,j(τ )θ 3
2 ,j
.
(7.14)hg ,1/2(τ ) = hg ,−1/2(−τ ),
(7.15)hg ,j(τ ) = ajq−j2/6 +
∞∑
n=1
(TrV Gr,ng) qn−j2/6
(7.16)V G =⊕
j=−1/2,1/2,3/2
∞⊕
n=1
V Gj,n
Page 25 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
forms from its N = 4 (N = 2) structures for any subgroup G of Co0 fixing at least a 3-plane (2-plane) in 24. In this section we will discuss a natural property of the vector-valued mock modular forms that distinguishes subgroups of M24 from other 3-plane (2-plane) fixing subgroups. These considerations lead to mock modular Mathieu moon-shine involving distinguished vector-valued mock modular forms of weight 1 / 2.
Recall the celebrated genus zero condition of monstrous moonshine, which states that the monstrous McKay–Thompson series are Hauptmoduls with only a polar term q−1 at the cusp represented by i∞, and no poles at any other cusps. To be more pre-cise, denote by Tg (τ ) =
∑n≥−1 q
ntrV
♮ng the graded character of the moonshine module
V ♮ =⊕
n≥−1 V♮n of Frenkel–Lepowsky–Meurman [37]. Then Tg (τ ) is a function invari-
ant under the action of a particular Ŵg < SL2(R) (specified in [15]), such that
Similarly, in Mathieu moonshine [35], it follows from the results of [7] that if g ∈ M24 and Zg denotes the g-twined K3 elliptic genus then
(cf. (5.4)) for some cg , cg ,γ ∈ C. In other words, the τ → i∞ limit of Zg |0,1γ is a z-inde-pendent constant whenever γ is not in the invariance group Ŵg. (Note that Ŵg is always a subgroup of SL2(Z) for g ∈ M24).
A natural question is therefore: among the subgroups of Co0 fixing 2- or 3-planes for which we have constructed a module in this work, for which of these do the associated modular objects satisfy a condition analogous to the preceding cases of moonshine described above? We will see presently that the Mathieu groups M23, M22, M12 and M11 are distinguished in our setting, in that the graded characters of their respective modules yield weight zero weak Jacobi forms satisfying the conditions
for some cg , cg ,γ ∈ C. On the other hand, all the other groups mentioned in Sect. 4 con-tain elements g for which the condition (ii) in (8.3) is not satisfied. Thus the conditions (8.3) single out the Mathieu groups as the sporadic simple subgroups of Co0 with this moonshine property. The constructions we have presented in this paper provide con-crete realizations of the underlying mock modular Mathieu moonshine modules.
Note that the conditions (8.3) impose restrictions on the degrees of the poles (if any) of the mock modular forms hg, hg (cf. Sects. 6, 7) at all cusps. In fact, for the case that G is a copy of M22 or M11 preserving N = 4 supersymmetry, the corresponding mock modular forms hg only have poles at the infinite cusp. This property also holds for the mock modular forms attached to M24 via N = 4 decomposition of the twined K3 ellip-tic genera of Mathieu moonshine, satisfying (8.2), as was demonstrated in [7]. In more
(8.1)(i) qTg (τ ) = O(1) as τ → i∞, and
(ii) Tg (γ τ) = O(1) as τ → i∞whenever γ ∈ SL2(Z) and γ∞ �∈ Ŵg∞.
(8.2)(i) Zg (τ , z) = cg + y+ y−1 as τ → i∞, and
(ii) Zg |0,1γ (τ , z) = cg ,γ as τ → i∞ whenever γ ∈ SL2(Z) and γ∞ �∈ Ŵg∞,
(8.3)(i) Zg (τ , z) = cg + y2 + y−2 as τ → i∞, and
(ii) Zg |0,2γ (τ , z) = cg ,γ as τ → i∞ whenever γ ∈ SL2(Z) and γ∞ �∈ Ŵg∞,
Page 26 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
physical terms, (8.2) and (8.3) can be interpreted as the condition that the elliptic genus of any cyclic orbifold of the theory receives no contributions from U(1)-charged ground states in twisted sectors.
To investigate the behaviour of Zg at cusps other than i∞, we first note that for any positve integer N,
where
and ǫi,N = ǫi when 2|N , and
otherwise. The above expressions can be derived from the transformation laws of Jacobi theta functions under SL2(Z).
Near the infinite cusp, τ → i∞, the different contributions have the following leading behaviour:
with
Zg |0,2( 1 0N 1
)(τ , z) = e
(N
12∑
ℓ=1
ρ2ℓ
2
)4∑
i=1
ǫi,N (−1)i+1�i,N (τ , z),
(8.4)�i,N (τ , z) =θi(τ , 2z)
η12(τ )
12∏
k=2
e
(ρ2kN
2
2τ
)θi(τ , ρk + Nρkτ ),
(8.5)
ǫ1,N = −ǫ1ǫ2,N = −ǫ3 = −1
ǫ3,N = −ǫ2ǫ4,N = −ǫ4 = −1
(8.6)
�1,N (τ , z) = e
�12+
12�
k=1
( 12− ρk)⌊Nρk⌋ − ρk
2
�qfN ,1(�g )/2(y− y−1) [1+O(q1/og )]
�2,N (τ , z) = e
�12�
k=1
−ρk⌊Nρk⌋ − ρk2
�qfN ,1(�g )/2(y+ y−1) [1+ O(q1/og )]
�3,N (τ , z) = e
�−
12�
k=1
ρk⌊ 12 + Nρk⌋�qfN ,2(�g )/2
�1+ q1/2(y2 + y−2)
�
×
12�
k=2
�1+ e(−ρk) q
⌊ 12+Nρk⌋+
12−Nρk
� ⌊ 12+Nρk⌋�
n=1
�1+ e(ρk)q
12+Nρk−n
�
× [1+ O(q1/og )]
�4,N (τ , z) = e
�−
12�
k=1
( 12+ ρk)⌊ 12 + Nρk⌋
�qfN ,2(�g )/2
�1− q1/2(y2 + y−2)
�
×
12�
k=2
�1− e(−ρk) q
⌊ 12+Nρk⌋+
12−Nρk
� ⌊ 12+Nρk⌋�
n=1
�1− e(ρk) q
12+Nρk−n
�
× [1+ O(q1/og )]
(8.7)fN ,1(�g ) = −1+12∑
k=1
(Nρk − 1/2)2 + ⌊Nρk⌋(1+ ⌊Nρk⌋ − 2Nρk) ,
Page 27 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
where ⌊x⌋ denotes the largest integer that is not greater than x.Comparing with the second condition in (8.3), we see that it is satisfied for γ =
( 1 0N 1
)
if and only if the �g satisfies
together with
for the case ǫ3,N ǫ4,N ǫ( 12∑12
k=1⌊ 12Nρk⌋) = 1, and
for the case ǫ3,N ǫ4,N ǫ( 12∑12
k=1⌊ 12Nρk⌋) = −1.Now we are left to check explicitly the condition (ii) in (8.3) for the various 2- and 3-plane
preserving subgroups discussed in Sect. 4. First, recall that, for n a positive integer, each cusp of Ŵ0(n) is represented by a rational number of the form u / v where u and v are coprime positive integers, v a divisor of n, and u / v is equivalent u′/v′ if and only if v = v′, and u = u′ mod (v, n/v). (note that the infinite cusp is also represented by 1 / n.) Via direct computation using the data of the eigenvalues of g ∈ Co0 acting on 24, we note that among all the groups we have considered in Sect. 4, the groups U4(3), U6(2) and McL all contain a conjugacy classe with Frame shape �g = 39/13, and HS has a conjugacy class with Frame shape �g = 55/11. One can explicitly check that f1,1(�g ) = 0 for these classes and hence the corresponding twining Zg |0,2
(1 01 1
)(τ , z) has a non-vanishing coefficient for q0y1 as
τ → i∞. (Note that the cusp at τ = 1 is not equivalent to the cusp at i∞ in these cases.) This excludes the groups U4(3), U6(2), McL and HS as candidates for moonshine satisfying (8.3).
For the subgroups of M24, a simple analysis of the cusp representatives of Ŵg = Ŵ(og ) shows that it is sufficient to verify (8.3) for γ =
( 1 0N 1
) for all N|n and N < n. For these
cases, we explicitly verify that (8.9)–(8.11) are satisfied and hence the moonshine condi-tion (8.3) is met.
We therefore conclude that we have established mock modular moonshine for all but the largest of the sporadic simple Mathieu groups, together with explicit constructions of the corresponding modules. Moreoever, the corresponding twined graded characters are mock modular forms arising from Jacobi forms satisfying the distinguishing condi-tions (8.3), which we may recognise as furnishing a natural analogue of the powerful principal modulus property (a.k.a. genus zero property) of monstrous moonshine.
The reader will note that many of the numbers which occur as dimensions of irreduc-ible representations of M23 also occur as dimensions of irreducible representations for M24. Indeed, looking at the Tables in “Appendix C”, one is tempted to guess that there is an alternative construction, or hidden symmetry in our model, which yields an M24
-module with the same graded dimensions. In fact, the procedure we have explained for computing twinings can be carried out for any element of M24, regarded as a subgroup
(8.8)fN ,2(�g ) = −1+12∑
k=1
N 2ρ2k − ⌊ 12 + Nρk⌋(2Nρk − ⌊ 12 + Nρk⌋) ,
(8.9)fN ,1(�g ) > 0,
(8.10)fN ,2(�g ) > −1,fN ,2(�g )
2+
∣∣∣∣1
2+ ⌊Nρk⌋ − Nρk
∣∣∣∣ ≥ 0
(8.11)fN ,2(�g ) ≥ 0
Page 28 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
of Co0, for any such element fixes a 2-space in 24. However, there is no 2-space that is fixed by every element of a given copy of M24, and explicit computations reveal that any M24-module structure on the module we have constructed would have to involve virtual representations. This indicates that there is no direct extension to M24 of the Mathieu moonshine modules we have considered here, despite the prominent role M24 plays in incorporating the different groups of moonshine in the current setting. Nevertheless, there is a certain modification of our method for which M24 is now known to play a lead-ing role. We refer the reader to the next, and final section for a description of this.
9 DiscussionIn this paper we have demonstrated that, starting with the free field Co0 module of [24], one can construct explicit examples of modules for various subgroups G ⊂ Co0 which underlie certain mock modular forms. In particular, subgroups which preserve a 3-plane (respectively 2-plane) in the 24 give rise to N = 4 (N = 2) modules with G symmetry. This gives completely explicit examples of mock modular moonshine for the smaller Mathieu groups, where the modules are known, and where the twining functions are distinguished in a manner directly similar to Mathieu moonshine. Other examples, including modules for the sporadic groups McL and HS, are also described.
There are several future directions. We considered here the N = 2 and N = 4 extended chiral algebras, and the subgroups of Co0 that they preserve. Other extended chiral algebras may also yield interesting results. For instance, supersymmetric sigma models with target a Spin(7) manifold give rise to an extended chiral algebra [58], whose representations were studied in [45]. It is an extension of the N = 1 superconformal algebra where instead of adding a U(1) current (which extends the theory to an N = 2 superconformal theory), one chooses an additional Ising factor. Conjectural characters for the unitary, irreducible representations of this algebra were worked out in [2], where it was shown that there is a suggestive relation between the decomposition of the ellip-tic genus of a Spin(7) manifold into these characters and irreducible representations of finite groups. This connection was made precise in [12], where it was shown that the same c = 12 theory can be viewed as an SCFT with extended N = 1 symmetry, and thus yields theories with global symmetry groups M24, Co2, and Co3. The partition function twined by these symmetries, when decomposed into characters of the Spin(7) algebra, gives rise to two-component vector-valued mock modular forms encoding infinite-dimensional modules for the corresponding sporadic groups.
The motivation that led, eventually, to the present study was actually to find connec-tions between geometrical target manifolds associated to c = 12 conformal field theo-ries, and sporadic groups. The elliptic genera of Calabi-Yau fourfolds were computed in [54], for instance; their structure is reminiscent of some of the modules we have seen here, and we intend to further explore and describe some of these connections in a future publication. Likewise, hyperkähler fourfolds, as well as the Spin(7) manifolds mentioned above, provide a wide class of geometries where an analogue of the connec-tions between M24 and K3 may be sought.
Last but not least, there are suggestive connections between the trace functions in moonshine modules, and certain special properties of the underlying conformal field theory. Both the CFT appearing in monstrous moonshine and the Co0 module that
Page 29 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
played a starring role in this paper appear to play special roles also in AdS3 quantum gravity, where they are candidates for CFT duals to pure (super)gravity [62]. The genus zero property of the twining functions in monstrous moonshine can be reformulated as a condition that these class functions should be expressed as Rademacher sums based on a fixed polar part [7, 29]; this latter description then applies uniformly to monstrous moonshine and Mathieu moonshine.
In this paper we demonstrate that a similar criterion also applies to our mock modu-lar Mathieu moonshines. In particular, we have shown that the Jacobi forms relevant for Mathieu moonshine display a specific asymptotic behaviour near non-infinite cusps, which, in physical terms, can be interpreted as a condition on orbifolds of the theory. Pursuing a deeper understanding of this property constitutes an enticing direction for the future.
10 EndnoteaSee however the recent work [26] which constructs the super vertex operator algebra
underlying the X = E38 case of umbral moonshine.
bThe observation that the decomposition into N = 4 characters of (a multiple of ) the function Z(τ , z) returns positive integers that are suggestive of representations of the Mathieu group M22 was first communicated privately by Jeff Harvey to J.D. in 2010.
Authors’ contributionsEach author contributing equally to all aspects of the production of this article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Author details1 Institute of Physics and Korteweg-de Vries Institute for Mathematics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Neth-erlands. 2 Department of Physics and SLAC, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. 3 Department of Mathematics, Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
AcknowledgmentsWe are grateful to Jeff Harvey, Sander Mack-Crane and Daniel Whalen for conversations about related subjects. We are grateful to Daniel Baumann, and the anonymous referees, for very helpful comments on earlier drafts. We note that the appearance of dimensions of M22 representations in an N = 4 decomposition of the partition function of the model studied in this paper was described in correspondence from J. Harvey to J. Duncan in 2010. The expression (5.2) for Z(τ , z) first came to our attention during the course of conversations with S. Mack-Crane. We thank the Simons Center for Geometry and Physics, and in particular the organizers of the workshop on “Mock Modular Forms, Moonshine, and String Theory,” for hospitality when this work was initiated. S.K. is grateful to the Aspen Center for Physics for providing the rockies during the completion of this work. X.D., S.H. and S.K. are supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation Grant PHY-0756174, the Department of Energy under contract DE-AC02-76SF00515, and the John Templeton Founda-tion. J.D. is supported in part by the Simons Foundation (#316779) and by the U.S. National Science Foundation (DMS 1203162). T.W. is supported by a Research Fellowship (Grant number WR 166/1-1) of the German Research Foundation (DFG).
Miranda C N Cheng is on leave from CNRS, Paris.
Compliance with ethical guidelines
Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Appendix A: Jacobi theta functionsWe define the Jacobi theta functions θi(τ , z) as follows for q = e(τ ) and y = e(z):
(9.1)θ1(τ , z) = −iq1/8y1/2∞∏
n=1
(1− qn)(1− yqn)(1− y−1qn−1),
(9.2)
θ2(τ , z) = q1/8y1/2∞∏
n=1
(1− qn)(1+ yqn)(1+ y−1qn−1),
Page 30 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
They transform in the following way under the group SL2(Z)⋉ Z2.
Here α(τ , z) =√−iτe( z
2
2τ ), and �,µ ∈ Z.The weight four Eisenstein series E4 can be written in terms of the Jacobi theta func-
tions as
(9.3)θ3(τ , z) =∞∏
n=1
(1− qn)(1+ y qn−1/2)(1+ y−1qn−1/2),
(9.4)θ4(τ , z) =∞∏
n=1
(1− qn)(1− y qn−1/2)(1− y−1qn−1/2).
(9.5)
θ1(τ , z) = i α−1(τ , z)θ1
(−1
τ,z
τ
)= e(−1/8) θ1(τ + 1, z)
= (−1)�+µe(12 (�
2τ + 2�z))θ1(τ , z + �τ + µ),
θ2(τ , z) = α−1(τ , z)θ4
(−1
τ,z
τ
)= e(−1/8) θ2(τ + 1, z)
= (−1)µe(12 (�
2τ + 2�z))θ2(τ , z + �τ + µ),
θ3(τ , z) = α−1(τ , z)θ3
(−1
τ,z
τ
)= θ4(τ + 1, z)
= e(12 (�
2τ + 2�z))θ3(τ , z + �τ + µ),
θ4(τ , z) = α−1(τ , z)θ2
(−1
τ,z
τ
)= θ3(τ + 1, z)
= (−1)�e(12 (�
2τ + 2�z))θ4(τ , z + �τ + µ).
(9.6)E4(τ ) =1
2
(θ2(τ , 0)
8 + θ3(τ , 0)8 + θ4(τ , 0)
8).
Table 1 Frame shapes and spinor characters for M22
[g] 1A 2A 3A 4A 4B 5A 6A 7A 7B 8A 11A 11B
�g 124
1828
1636 1
42444
142444
1454
12223362
1373
1373
122.4.8
21211
21211
2
Tr4096g 2,048 0 64 0 0 0 0 8 8 0 4 4
Table 2 Frame shapes and spinor characters for U4(3)
[g] 1A 2A 3A 3BCD 4AB 5A 6A 6BC 7AB 8A 9ABCD 12A
�g 124
1828 3
9
131636
142244 1
454 1
53.6
4
2412223362
1373
122.4.8
2 1393
321.2
23.12
2
42
Rg 2,048 0 −8 64 0 0 72 0 8 0 4 0
Appendix B: Character tablesB1: Frame shapes and spinor representations
See Tables 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.
Page 31 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Table 3 Frame shapes and spinor characters for M23
[g] 1A 2A 3A 4A 5A 6A 7AB 8A 11AB 14AB 15AB 23AB
�g 124
1828
1636
142244 1
454
12223362
1373
122.4.8
21211
2 1.2.7.14 1.3.5.15 1.23
Tr4096g 2,048 0 64 0 0 0 8 0 4 0 4 2
Table 4 Frame shapes and spinor characters for McL
[g] 1A 2A 3A 3B 4A 5A 5B 6A 6B 7AB
�g 124
1828 3
9
131636
142244 5
5
11454 1
53.6
4
2412223362
1373
Tr4096g 2,048 0 −8 64 0 −4 0 72 0 8
[g] 8A 9AB 10A 11AB 12A 14AB 15AB 30AB
�g 122.4.8
2 1393
32135.10
2
221211
2 1.223.12
2
421.2.7.14 1
215
2
3.5
2.3.5.30
6.10
Tr4096g 0 4 20 4 0 0 2 2
Table 5 Frame shapes and spinor characters for HS
[g] 1A 2A 2B 3A 4A 4BC 5A 5BC 6A 6B
�g 124
1828
212
1636 2
644
14142244 5
5
11454
2363
12223362
Tr4096g 2,048 0 0 64 0 0 −4 0 0 0
[g] 7A 8ABC 10A 10B 11AB 12A 15A 20AB
�g 1373
122.4.8
2 135.10
2
222210
21211
2 124.6
212
321.3.5.15 1.2.10.20
4.5
Tr4096g 8 0 20 0 4 0 4 0
Table 6 Frame shapes and spinor characters for U6(2)
[g] 1A 2A 2B 2C 3A 3B 3C 4A 4B 4CDE 4F 4G
�g 124 2
16
181828
212
1636 3
9
131636 1
848
2848
24142244 2
444
142244
Tr4069g 2048 0 0 0 64 –8 64 256 0 0 0 0
[g] 5A 6AB 6C 6D 6E 6F 6G 6H 7A 8A 8BCD
�g 1454 1.6
6
22332464
1232153.6
4
24122232621
42.6
5
34122232622363
1373 1
484
2242122.4.8
2
Tr4096g 0 0 0 72 0 0 0 0 8 32 0
[g] 9ABC 10A 11AB 12AB 12C 12DE 12FGH 12I 15A 18AB
�g 1393
32122.10
3
521211
2 2.3312
3
1.4.6312324212
2
22621312
3
2.3.4.6
1.223.12
2
422.4.6.12 1.3.5.15 1.2.18
2
6.9
Tr4096g 4 0 4 4 16 12 0 0 4 0
Page 32 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
B2: I
rred
ucib
le re
pres
enta
tions
See
Tabl
es 7
, 8, 9
, 10,
11,
12,
13,
14.
Tabl
e 7
Char
acte
r tab
le o
f M22. b
p=
(−1+
i√p)/2
[g]
1A2A
3A4A
4B5A
6A7A
7B8A
11A
11B
[g2]
1A1A
3A2A
2A5A
3A7A
7B4A
11B
11A
[g3]
1A2A
1A4A
4B5A
2A7B
7A8A
11A
11B
[g5]
1A2A
3A4A
4B1A
6A7B
7A8A
11A
11B
[g7]
1A2A
3A4A
4B5A
6A1A
1A8A
11B
11A
[g11]
1A2A
3A4A
4B5A
6A7A
7B8A
1A1A
χ1
11
11
11
11
11
11
χ2
215
31
11
−1
00
−1
−1
−1
χ3
45−
30
11
00
b7
b7
−1
11
χ4
45−
30
11
00
b7
b7
−1
11
χ5
557
13
−1
01
−1
−1
10
0
χ6
993
03
−1
−1
01
1−
10
0
χ7
154
101
−2
2−
11
00
00
0
χ8
210
23
−2
−2
0−
10
00
11
χ9
231
7−
3−
1−
11
10
0−
10
0
χ10
280
−8
10
00
10
00
b11
b11
χ11
280
−8
10
00
10
00
b11
b11
χ12
385
1−
21
10
−2
00
10
0
Page 33 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 8
Char
acte
r tab
le o
f U4(3). bp=
(−1+
i√p)/2
[g]
1A2A
3A3B
3C3D
4A4B
5A6A
6B6C
7A7B
8A9A
9B9C
9D12
A
[g2]
1A1A
3A3B
3C3D
2A2A
5A3A
3B3C
7A7B
4A9B
9A9D
9C6A
[g3]
1A2A
1A1A
1A1A
4A4B
5A2A
2A2A
7B7A
8A3A
3A3A
3A4A
[g5]
1A2A
3A3B
3C3D
4A4B
1A6A
6B6C
7B7A
8A9B
9A9D
9C12
A
[g7]
1A2A
3A3B
3C3D
4A4B
5A6A
6B6C
1A1A
8A9A
9B9C
9D12
A
χ1
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
χ2
215
−6
33
31
11
2−
1−
10
0−
10
00
0−
2
χ3
353
88
−1
−1
3−
10
00
30
0−
12
2−
1−
10
χ4
353
8−
18
−1
3−
10
03
00
0−
1−
1−
12
20
χ5
9010
99
90
−2
20
11
1−
1−
10
00
00
1
χ6
140
125
−4
−4
54
00
−3
00
00
0−
1−
1−
1−
11
χ7
189
−3
270
00
51
−1
30
00
01
00
00
−1
χ8
210
221
33
3−
2−
20
5−
1−
10
00
00
00
1
χ9
280
−8
1010
11
00
0−
2−
21
00
01+
3b3
1+
3b3
11
0
χ10
280
−8
1010
11
00
0−
2−
21
00
01+
3b3
1+
3b3
11
0
χ11
280
−8
101
101
00
0−
21
−2
00
01
11+
3b3
1+
3b3
0
χ12
280
−8
101
101
00
0−
21
−2
00
01
11+
3b3
1+
3b3
0
χ13
315
11−
918
−9
0−
1−
10
−1
2−
10
01
00
00
−1
χ14
315
11−
9−
918
0−
1−
10
−1
−1
20
01
00
00
−1
χ15
420
4−
396
6−
34
00
1−
2−
20
00
00
00
1
χ16
560
−16
−34
22
20
00
22
20
00
−1
−1
−1
−1
0
χ17
640
0−
8−
8−
81
00
00
00
b7
b7
01
11
10
χ18
640
0−
8−
8−
81
00
00
00
b7
b7
01
11
10
χ19
729
90
00
0−
31
−1
00
01
1−
10
00
00
χ20
896
032
−4
−4
−4
00
10
00
00
0−
1−
1−
1−
10
Page 34 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 9
Char
acte
r tab
le o
f M23. b
p=
(−1+
i√p)/2
[g]
1A2A
3A4A
5A6A
7A7B
8A11
A11
B14
A14
B15
A15
B23
A23
B
[g2]
1A1A
3A2A
5A3A
7A7B
4A11
B11
A7A
7B15
A15
B23
A23
B
[g3]
1A2A
1A4A
5A2A
7B7A
8A11
A11
B14
B14
A5A
5A23
A23
B
[g5]
1A2A
3A4A
1A6A
7B7A
8A11
A11
B14
B14
A3A
3A23
B23
A
[g7]
1A2A
3A4A
5A6A
1A1A
8A11
B11
A2A
2A15
B15
A23
B23
A
[g11]
1A2A
3A4A
5A6A
7A7B
8A1A
1A14
A14
B15
B15
A23
B23
A
[g23]
1A2A
3A4A
5A6A
7A7B
8A11
A11
B14
A14
B15
A15
B1A
1A
χ1
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
1
χ2
226
42
20
11
00
0−
1−
1−
1−
1−
1−
1
χ3
45−
30
10
0b7
b7
−1
11
−b7
−b7
00
−1
−1
χ4
45−
30
10
0b7
b7
−1
11
−b7
−b7
00
−1
−1
χ5
230
225
20
1−
1−
10
−1
−1
11
00
00
χ6
231
76
−1
1−
20
0−
10
00
01
11
1
χ7
231
7−
3−
11
10
0−
10
00
0b15
b15
11
χ8
231
7−
3−
11
10
0−
10
00
0b15
b15
11
χ9
253
131
1−
21
11
−1
00
−1
−1
11
00
χ10
770
−14
5−
20
10
00
00
00
00
b23
b23
χ11
770
−14
5−
20
10
00
00
00
00
b23
b23
χ12
896
0−
40
10
00
0b11
b11
00
11
−1
−1
χ13
896
0−
40
10
00
0b11
b11
00
11
−1
−1
χ14
990
−18
02
00
b7
b7
00
0b7
b7
00
11
χ15
990
−18
02
00
b7
b7
00
0b7
b7
00
11
χ16
1035
270
−1
00
−1
−1
11
1−
1−
10
00
0
χ17
2024
8−
10
−1
−1
11
00
01
1−
1−
10
0
Page 35 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 10
Cha
ract
er ta
ble
of M
cL. b
p=
(−1+
i√p)/2
, a=
1+
3b3
[g]
1A2A
3A3B
4A5A
5B6A
6B7A
7B8A
9A9B
10A
11A
11B
12A
14A
14B
15A
15B
30A
30B
[g2]
1A1A
3A3B
2A5A
5B3A
3B7A
7B4A
9B9A
5A11
B11
A6A
7A7B
15A
15B
15A
15B
[g3]
1A2A
1A1A
4A5A
5B2A
2A7B
7A8A
3A3A
10A
11A
11B
4A14
B14
A5A
5A10
A10
A
[g5]
1A2A
3A3B
4A1A
1A6A
6B7B
7A8A
9B9A
2A11
A11
B12
A14
B14
A3A
3A6A
6A
[g7]
1A2A
3A3B
4A5A
5B6A
6B1A
1A8A
9A9B
10A
11B
11A
12A
2A2A
15B
15A
30B
30A
[g11]
1A2A
3A3B
4A5A
5B6A
6B7A
7B8A
9B9A
10A
1A1A
12A
14A
14B
15B
15A
30B
30A
χ1
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
χ2
226
−5
42
−3
23
01
10
11
10
0−
1−
1−
10
0−
2−
2
χ3
231
715
6−
16
17
−2
00
−1
00
20
0−
10
00
02
2
χ4
252
289
94
22
11
00
00
0−
2−
1−
11
00
−1
−1
11
χ5
770
−14
−13
5−
2−
50
71
00
0−
1−
11
00
10
0b15
b15
b15
b15
χ6
770
−14
−13
5−
2−
50
71
00
0−
1−
11
00
10
0b15
b15
b15
b15
χ7
896
032
−4
0−
41
00
00
0−
1−
10
b11
b11
00
02
20
0
χ8
896
032
−4
0−
41
00
00
0−
1−
10
b11
b11
00
02
20
0
χ9
1750
70−
513
20
0−
51
00
0−
2−
20
11
−1
00
00
00
χ10
3520
64−
4410
0−
50
4−
2−
1−
10
11
−1
00
01
11
1−
1−
1
χ11
3520
−64
−44
100
−5
0−
42
−1
−1
01
11
00
0−
1−
11
11
1
χ12
4500
2045
−9
40
05
−1
−1
−1
00
00
11
1−
1−
10
00
0
χ13
4752
−48
540
02
2−
60
−1
−1
00
02
00
01
1−
1−
1−
1−
1
χ14
5103
630
03
3−
20
00
01
00
3−
1−
10
00
00
00
χ15
5544
−56
369
019
−1
41
00
00
0−
10
00
00
11
−1
−1
χ16
8019
−45
00
3−
6−
10
0−b7
−b7
−1
00
00
00
−b7
−b7
00
00
χ17
8019
−45
00
3−
6−
10
0−b7
−b7
−1
00
00
00
−b7
−b7
00
00
χ18
8250
1015
6−
20
0−
5−
2−b7
−b7
00
00
00
1b7
b7
00
00
χ19
8250
1015
6−
20
0−
5−
2−b7
−b7
00
00
00
1b7
b7
00
00
χ20
9625
105
40−
5−
30
00
30
0−
11
10
00
00
00
00
0
Page 36 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
[g]
1A2A
3A3B
4A5A
5B6A
6B7A
7B8A
9A9B
10A
11A
11B
12A
14A
14B
15A
15B
30A
30B
χ21
9856
0−
80−
80
61
00
00
0a
a0
00
00
00
00
0
χ22
9856
0−
80−
80
61
00
00
0a
a0
00
00
00
00
0
χ23
1039
5−
2127
0−
1−
50
30
00
10
0−
10
0−
10
0b15
b15
−b15
−b15
χ24
1039
5−
2127
0−
1−
50
30
00
10
0−
10
0−
10
0b15
b15
−b15
−b15
Tabl
e 10
con
tinu
ed
Page 37 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 11
Cha
ract
er ta
ble
of HS.
bp=
(−1+
i√p)/2
, ap=
i√p
[g]
1A2A
2B3A
4A4B
4C5A
5B5C
6A6B
7A8A
8B8C
10A
10B
11A
11B
12A
15A
20A
20B
[g2]
1A1A
1A3A
2A2A
2A5A
5B5C
3A3A
7A4B
4C4C
5A5B
11B
11A
6B15
A10
A10
A
[g3]
1A2A
2B1A
4A4B
4C5A
5B5C
2B2A
7A8A
8B8C
10A
10B
11A
11B
4A5B
20A
20B
[g5]
1A2A
2B3A
4A4B
4C1A
1A1A
6A6B
7A8A
8B8C
2A2B
11A
11B
12A
3A4A
4A
[g7]
1A2A
2B3A
4A4B
4C5A
5B5C
6A6B
1A8A
8B8C
10A
10B
11B
11A
12A
15A
20A
20B
[g11]
1A2A
2B3A
4A4B
4C5A
5B5C
6A6B
7A8A
8B8C
10A
10B
1A1A
12A
15A
20B
20A
χ1
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
χ2
226
−2
4−
62
2−
32
2−
20
10
00
1−
20
00
−1
−1
−1
χ3
7713
15
55
12
−3
21
10
1−
1−
1−
21
00
−1
00
0
χ4
154
1010
1−
26
−2
44
−1
11
00
00
00
00
11
−2
−2
χ5
154
10−
101
−10
−2
24
4−
1−
11
00
2−
20
00
0−
11
00
χ6
154
10−
101
−10
−2
24
4−
1−
11
00
−2
20
00
0−
11
00
χ7
175
1511
415
−1
30
50
20
0−
11
10
1−
1−
10
−1
00
χ8
231
7−
96
15−
1−
16
11
0−
20
−1
−1
−1
21
00
01
00
χ9
693
219
021
51
−7
3−
20
00
1−
1−
11
−1
00
00
11
χ10
770
34−
105
−14
2−
2−
50
0−
11
0−
20
0−
10
00
10
11
χ11
770
−14
105
−10
−2
−2
−5
00
11
00
00
10
00
−1
0a5
a5
χ12
770
−14
105
−10
−2
−2
−5
00
11
00
00
10
00
−1
0a5
a5
χ13
825
259
6−
151
10
−5
00
−2
−1
11
10
−1
00
01
00
χ14
896
016
−4
00
0−
41
1−
20
00
00
01
b11
b11
01
00
χ15
896
016
−4
00
0−
41
1−
20
00
00
01
b11
b11
01
00
χ16
1056
320
−6
00
06
−4
10
2−
10
00
20
00
0−
10
0
χ17
1386
−6
180
6−
2−
211
61
00
00
00
−1
−2
00
00
11
χ18
1408
016
40
00
8−
7−
2−
20
10
00
01
00
0−
10
0
χ19
1750
−10
10−
5−
106
20
00
1−
10
−2
00
00
11
−1
00
0
χ20
1925
5−
19−
15
5−
30
50
−1
−1
01
11
01
00
−1
−1
00
χ21
1925
51
−1
−35
−3
10
50
1−
10
1−
1−
10
10
01
−1
00
Page 38 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
[g]
1A2A
2B3A
4A4B
4C5A
5B5C
6A6B
7A8A
8B8C
10A
10B
11A
11B
12A
15A
20A
20B
χ22
2520
240
024
−8
0−
50
00
00
00
0−
10
11
00
−1
−1
χ23
2750
−50
−10
510
22
00
0−
11
−1
00
00
00
01
00
0
χ24
3200
0−
16−
40
00
0−
50
20
10
00
0−
1−
1−
10
10
0
Tabl
e 11
con
tinu
ed
Page 39 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Table 12 Character table of U6(2) - Part I
[g] 1A 2A 2B 2C 3A 3B 3C 4A 4B 4C 4D 4E 4F 4G 5A
[g2] 1A 1A 1A 1A 3A 3B 3C 2A 2A 2B 2B 2B 2B 2B 5A
[g3] 1A 2A 2B 2C 1A 1A 1A 4A 4B 4C 4D 4E 4F 4G 5A
[g5] 1A 2A 2B 2C 3A 3B 3C 4A 4B 4C 4D 4E 4F 4G 1A
[g7] 1A 2A 2B 2C 3A 3B 3C 4A 4B 4C 4D 4E 4F 4G 5A
[g11] 1A 2A 2B 2C 3A 3B 3C 4A 4B 4C 4D 4E 4F 4G 5A
χ1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
χ2 22 −10 6 −2 4 −5 4 6 −2 2 2 2 −2 2 2
χ3 231 39 7 −9 6 15 6 23 7 −1 −1 −1 −1 −1 1
χ4 252 60 28 12 9 9 9 12 −4 4 4 4 4 4 2
χ5 385 −95 17 −7 25 7 −2 1 9 5 5 5 −7 −3 0
χ6 440 120 24 8 35 8 −1 24 8 0 0 0 8 0 0
χ7 560 −80 −16 16 20 20 2 16 −16 0 0 0 0 0 0
χ8 616 −24 40 8 −14 −5 13 8 8 8 8 8 0 0 1
χ9 770 −30 −14 10 5 −13 5 34 −6 −2 −2 −2 2 −2 0
χ10 770 −30 −14 10 5 −13 5 34 −6 −2 −2 −2 2 −2 0
χ11 1155 195 35 19 30 −6 3 −13 3 11 −5 −5 3 3 0
χ12 1155 195 35 19 30 −6 3 −13 3 −5 11 −5 3 3 0
χ13 1155 195 35 19 30 −6 3 −13 3 −5 −5 11 3 3 0
χ14 1386 −246 58 −30 36 9 9 −6 2 −2 −2 −2 −6 6 1
χ15 1540 260 4 −28 55 1 1 −12 −12 4 4 4 4 −4 0
χ16 3080 −440 40 −8 65 2 −7 40 −8 0 0 0 −8 0 0
χ17 3080 −440 40 −8 65 2 −7 40 −8 0 0 0 −8 0 0
χ18 3520 −320 64 0 10 −44 10 64 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
χ19 4620 −180 44 −36 −15 57 12 28 −20 4 4 4 −4 −4 0
χ20 4928 320 64 64 −4 68 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 −2
χ21 5544 −24 −56 24 9 36 9 72 24 0 0 0 −8 0 −1
χ22 6160 400 −48 −16 40 −50 4 48 16 0 0 0 0 0 0
χ23 6160 400 −48 −16 40 −50 4 48 16 0 0 0 0 0 0
χ24 6930 690 98 42 45 −36 −9 18 −6 6 6 6 10 −2 0
χ25 8064 384 128 0 −36 −36 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 −1
χ26 9240 −360 88 −8 −30 33 −3 −8 −8 24 −8 −8 0 0 0
χ27 9240 −360 88 −8 −30 33 −3 −8 −8 −8 24 −8 0 0 0
χ28 9240 −360 88 −8 −30 33 −3 −8 −8 −8 −8 24 0 0 0
χ29 10395 315 −21 −45 0 27 0 75 −13 −1 −1 −1 3 −1 0
χ30 10395 315 −21 −45 0 27 0 75 −13 −1 −1 −1 3 −1 0
χ31 10395 315 −21 −45 0 27 0 −21 19 15 −1 −1 3 −1 0
χ32 10395 315 −21 −45 0 27 0 −21 19 −1 15 −1 3 −1 0
χ33 10395 315 −21 −45 0 27 0 −21 19 −1 −1 15 3 −1 0
χ34 11264 1024 0 0 104 32 −4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 −1
χ35 13860 420 100 36 −45 9 −18 84 20 4 4 4 −4 4 0
χ36 14784 −1344 64 0 114 −12 6 −64 0 0 0 0 0 0 −1
χ37 18711 −1161 −57 63 81 0 0 −9 15 3 3 3 −1 −5 1
χ38 18711 1431 87 −9 81 0 0 −9 −9 −9 −9 −9 −1 −1 1
χ39 20790 −810 6 −18 0 54 0 6 14 −6 −6 −6 6 2 0
χ40 20790 −810 6 −18 0 54 0 6 14 −6 −6 −6 6 2 0
χ41 24640 −960 64 −64 −20 −92 −11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
χ42 25515 −405 −117 27 0 0 0 27 −21 3 3 3 3 3 0
χ43 25515 −405 −117 27 0 0 0 27 −21 3 3 3 3 3 0
χ44 32768 0 0 0 −64 −64 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 −2
χ45 37422 270 30 54 −81 0 0 −18 6 −6 −6 −6 −2 −6 2
χ46 40095 1215 −81 −9 0 0 0 −81 −9 3 3 3 −9 3 0
Page 40 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Table 13 Character table of U6(2) - Part II. aq = q+ 6i√3, c−3 = (1− 3i
√3)/2
[g] 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 6F 6G 6H 7A 8A 8B 8C 8D 9A 9B 9C
[g2] 3B 3B 3A 3B 3A 3C 3C 3C 7A 4B 4C 4D 4E 9B 9A 9C
[g3] 2A 2A 2A 2B 2B 2A 2B 2C 7A 8A 8B 8C 8D 3B 3B 3B
[g5] 6B 6A 6C 6D 6E 6F 6G 6H 7A 8A 8B 8C 8D 9B 9A 9C
[g7] 6A 6B 6C 6D 6E 6F 6G 6H 1A 8A 8B 8C 8D 9A 9B 9C
[g11] 6B 6A 6C 6D 6E 6F 6G 6H 7A 8A 8B 8C 8D 9B 9A 9C
χ1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
χ2 −1 −1 −4 3 0 2 0 −2 1 2 0 0 0 1 1 1
χ3 3 3 6 7 −2 0 −2 0 0 3 −1 −1 −1 0 0 0
χ4 −3 −3 9 1 1 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
χ5 −5 −5 1 −1 5 −2 2 2 0 1 −1 −1 −1 1 1 1
χ6 12 12 3 0 3 3 3 −1 −1 0 0 0 0 2 2 −1
χ7 −8 −8 4 −4 −4 −2 2 −2 0 0 0 0 0 −1 −1 2
χ8 3 3 −6 −5 −2 3 1 −1 0 0 0 0 0 −2 −2 −2
χ9 a−3 a−3 −3 7 1 −3 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 −1 −1 −1
χ10 a−3 a−3 −3 7 1 −3 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 −1 −1 −1
χ11 6 6 6 2 2 −3 −1 1 0 −1 3 −1 −1 0 0 0
χ12 6 6 6 2 2 −3 −1 1 0 −1 −1 3 −1 0 0 0
χ13 6 6 6 2 2 −3 −1 1 0 −1 −1 −1 3 0 0 0
χ14 −3 −3 −12 1 4 −3 1 −3 0 −2 0 0 0 0 0 0
χ15 17 17 −1 1 −5 −1 1 −1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
χ16 a−8 a−8 1 −2 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 c−3 c−3 −1
χ17 a−8 a−8 1 −2 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 c−3 c−3 −1
χ18 4 4 −14 4 −2 4 −2 0 −1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
χ19 9 9 9 −7 5 0 −4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
χ20 −4 −4 −4 4 4 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 −1 −1 2
χ21 12 12 9 4 1 −3 1 −3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
χ22 a4 a4 −8 −6 0 −2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 −c−3 −c−3 1
χ23 a4 a4 −8 −6 0 −2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 −c−3 −c−3 1
χ24 −12 −12 −3 −4 5 −3 −1 −3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
χ25 −12 −12 12 −4 −4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
χ26 9 9 −6 1 −2 −3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
χ27 9 9 −6 1 −2 −3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
χ28 9 9 −6 1 −2 −3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
χ29 −9 −9 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 −1 1 1 1 0 0 0
χ30 −9 −9 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 −1 1 1 1 0 0 0
χ31 −9 −9 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 −1 −3 1 1 0 0 0
χ32 −9 −9 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 −1 1 −3 1 0 0 0
χ33 −9 −9 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 −1 1 1 −3 0 0 0
χ34 16 16 −8 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 −1 −1 −1
χ35 −3 −3 3 1 −5 0 −2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
χ36 −12 −12 −6 4 −2 0 −2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
χ37 0 0 9 0 −3 0 0 0 0 −1 1 1 1 0 0 0
χ38 0 0 9 0 −3 0 0 0 0 −1 −1 −1 −1 0 0 0
χ39 18i√3 −18i
√3 0 −6 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
χ40 −18i√3 18i
√3 0 −6 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
χ41 12 12 12 4 4 3 1 −1 0 0 0 0 0 −2 −2 1
χ42 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 −1 −1 −1 −1 0 0 0
χ43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 −1 −1 −1 −1 0 0 0
χ44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 −1
Page 41 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Table 13 continued
χ45 0 0 −9 0 3 0 0 0 0 −2 0 0 0 0 0 0
χ46 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 −1 3 1 1 1 0 0 0
Table 14 Character table of U6(2) - Part III. aq = q+ 6i√3, bp = (−1+ i
√p)/2,
dnm = m+ in
√3
[g] 10A 11A 11B 12A 12B 12C 12D 12E 12F 12G 12H 12I 15A 18A 18B
[g2] 5A 11B 11A 6B 6A 6C 6B 6A 6D 6D 6D 6E 15A 9B 9A
[g3] 10A 11A 11B 4A 4A 4A 4B 4B 4C 4D 4E 4F 5A 6A 6B
[g5] 2A 11A 11B 12B 12A 12C 12E 12D 12F 12G 12H 12I 3A 18B 18A
[g7] 10A 11B 11A 12A 12B 12C 12D 12E 12F 12G 12H 12I 15A 18A 18B
[g11] 10A 1A 1A 12B 12A 12C 12E 12D 12F 12G 12H 12I 15A 18B 18A
χ1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
χ2 0 0 0 −3 −3 0 1 1 −1 −1 −1 −2 −1 −1 −1
χ3 −1 0 0 5 5 2 1 1 −1 −1 −1 2 1 0 0
χ4 0 −1 −1 3 3 −3 −1 −1 1 1 1 1 −1 0 0
χ5 0 0 0 1 1 1 −3 −3 −1 −1 −1 −1 0 1 1
χ6 0 0 0 6 6 3 2 2 0 0 0 −1 0 0 0
χ7 0 −1 −1 −2 −2 4 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
χ8 1 0 0 −1 −1 2 −1 −1 −1 −1 −1 0 1 0 0
χ9 0 0 0 d−3
−2d−3
−21 d−1
0d10
1 1 1 −1 0 d10 d−1
0
χ10 0 0 0 d−3
−2d−3
−21 d1
0 d−1
01 1 1 −1 0 d−1
0d10
χ11 0 0 0 −4 −4 2 0 0 2 −2 −2 0 0 0 0
χ12 0 0 0 −4 −4 2 0 0 −2 2 −2 0 0 0 0
χ13 0 0 0 −4 −4 2 0 0 −2 −2 2 0 0 0 0
χ14 −1 0 0 3 3 0 −1 −1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0
χ15 0 0 0 −3 −3 3 −3 −3 1 1 1 1 0 −1 −1
χ16 0 0 0 d−3
−5d−3
−51 d−1
1d−1
10 0 0 1 0 d
−1/2−1/2 d
−1/2−1/2
χ17 0 0 0 d−3
−5d−3
−51 d−1
1d−1
10 0 0 1 0 d
−1/2−1/2 d
−1/2−1/2
χ18 0 0 0 −8 −8 −2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
χ19 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 −1 0 0 0
χ20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 −1 −1
χ21 1 0 0 0 0 −3 0 0 0 0 0 1 −1 0 0
χ22 0 0 0 −6b3 −6b3 0 d−1
1d−1
10 0 0 0 0 d
−1/2−1/2 d
−1/2−1/2
χ23 0 0 0 −6b3 −6b3 0 d−1
1d−1
10 0 0 0 0 d
−1/2−1/2 d
−1/2−1/2
χ24 0 0 0 0 0 −3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
χ25 −1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 −1 0 0
χ26 0 0 0 1 1 −2 1 1 −3 1 1 0 0 0 0
χ27 0 0 0 1 1 −2 1 1 1 −3 1 0 0 0 0
χ28 0 0 0 1 1 −2 1 1 1 1 −3 0 0 0 0
χ29 0 0 0 −a−3 −a−3 0 d−2
−1d−2
−1−1 −1 −1 0 0 0 0
χ30 0 0 0 −a−3 −a−3 0 d−2
−1d−2
−1−1 −1 −1 0 0 0 0
χ31 0 0 0 −3 −3 0 1 1 3 −1 −1 0 0 0 0
χ32 0 0 0 −3 −3 0 1 1 −1 3 −1 0 0 0 0
χ33 0 0 0 −3 −3 0 1 1 −1 −1 3 0 0 0 0
χ34 −1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 −1 1 1
χ35 0 0 0 3 3 3 −1 −1 1 1 1 −1 0 0 0
χ36 1 0 0 8 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 −1 0 0
χ37 −1 0 0 0 0 −3 0 0 0 0 0 −1 1 0 0
Page 42 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Table 14 continued
χ38 1 0 0 0 0 −3 0 0 0 0 0 −1 1 0 0
χ39 0 0 0 6b3 6b3 0 d1−1 d1−10 0 0 0 0 0 0
χ40 0 0 0 6b3 6b3 0 d1−1d1−1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
χ41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
χ42 0 −b11 −b11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
χ43 0 −b11 −b11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
χ44 0 −1 −1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
χ45 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 −1 0 0
χ46 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table 15 The twined series for M22. The table shows the Fourier coefficients multiplying q−D/12 in the q-expansion of the function hg,1(τ)
−D[g] 1A 2A 3A 4AB 5A 6A 7AB 8A 11AB
−1 −2 −2 −2 −2 −2 −2 −2 −2 −2
11 560 −16 2 0 0 2 0 0 −1
23 8470 54 −8 −2 0 0 0 2 0
35 70576 −144 16 0 −4 0 2 0 0
47 435820 332 4 4 0 −4 0 0 0
59 2187328 −704 −50 0 8 −2 −4 0 0
71 9493330 1394 58 −6 0 2 0 −2 0
83 36792560 −2640 38 0 0 6 0 0 2
95 130399766 4822 −172 6 −14 4 0 −2 2
107 429229920 −8480 174 0 0 −2 0 0 −2
119 1327987562 14506 104 −6 22 −8 6 2 0
131 3895785632 −24288 −502 0 −8 −6 4 0 2
143 10912966810 39770 466 10 0 2 −10 2 −2
155 29351354032 −63888 316 0 −28 12 0 0 0
167 76141761850 101018 −1232 −14 0 8 0 −2 0
179 191223891936 −157344 1098 0 56 −6 0 0 0
191 466389602756 241764 710 12 −14 −18 0 0 0
203 1107626293840 −366960 −2876 0 0 −12 10 0 0
215 2567229121428 550676 2472 −12 −62 8 6 4 4
227 5818567673360 −817840 1658 0 0 26 −20 0 2
239 12917927405852 1203068 −6148 20 112 20 0 0 −4
251 28135083779792 −1753840 5174 0 −48 −10 −4 0 0
263 60194978116000 2535488 3382 −24 0 −34 0 −4 2
275 126660856741328 −3637232 −12634 0 −112 −26 0 0 −3
287 262393981258310 5179526 10430 22 0 14 20 −2 0
Appendix C: Coefficient tablesSee Tables 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28.
Page 43 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 16
The
twin
ed s
erie
s fo
r M22. T
he ta
ble
show
s th
e Fo
urie
r coe
ffici
ents
mul
tipl
ying
q−D/12 in
the q-
expa
nsio
n of
the
func
tion
hg,2(τ)
−D
[g]
1A2A
3A4A
B5A
6A7A
B8A
11A
B
−4
11
11
11
11
1
821
02
3−
20
−1
00
1
2044
44−
47
4−
1−
1−
10
0
3242
560
16−
194
01
0−
21
4428
1512
−24
19−
87
30
00
5614
8196
412
24−
12−
60
10
0
6866
4920
0−
16−
8116
0−
15
0−
3
8026
4552
6464
7024
−6
−2
−4
40
9295
7314
05−
8370
−27
0−
20
10
104
3206
2637
236
−24
8−
3622
0−
40
0
116
1006
5671
56−
4421
744
−14
10
01
128
2990
3386
8016
818
352
03
0−
6−
1
140
8469
1294
48−
216
−65
6−
72−
170
30
−1
152
2300
0871
960
8855
8−
880
−2
100
0
164
6018
6506
768
−11
243
111
248
−1
−11
03
176
1523
3580
3872
416
−15
8214
4−
282
08
−1
188
3741
7253
0930
−49
413
40−
166
04
−5
−2
0
200
8943
5292
9498
202
981
−20
2−
421
00
−5
212
2085
1575
2830
0−
244
−35
4524
40
−1
00
0
224
4751
6756
0102
486
429
4628
010
4−
69
−12
0
236
1060
2363
9451
84−
1056
2077
−35
2−
51−
318
00
248
2319
9658
8165
8042
0−
7480
−42
00
0−
200
4
260
4985
1590
6540
96−
496
6146
496
−84
20
00
272
1053
2310
8387
200
1792
4228
608
04
−10
160
284
2190
2185
0730
991
−20
97−
1509
9−
697
196
−3
03
0
Page 44 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 17
The
twin
ed s
erie
s fo
r U4(3).
The
tabl
e sh
ows
the
Four
ier c
oeffi
cien
ts m
ulti
plyi
ng q−D/12 in
the q-
expa
nsio
n of
the
func
tion
hg,1(τ)
−D
[g]
1A2A
3A3B
CD4A
B5A
6A6B
C7A
B8A
9ABC
D12
A
−1
−2
−2
−2
−2
−2
−2
−2
−2
−2
−2
−2
−2
1156
0−
16−
342
00
22
00
−1
0
2384
7054
−11
6−
8−
20
00
02
1−
2
3570
576
−14
4−
272
160
−4
00
20
10
4743
5820
332
−66
24
40
2−
40
0−
2−
2
5921
8732
8−
704
−14
54−
500
8−
2−
2−
40
40
7194
9333
013
94−
2732
58−
60
−4
20
−2
10
8336
7925
60−
2640
−52
5438
00
66
00
−7
0
9513
0399
766
4822
−98
02−
172
6−
1410
40
−2
20
107
4292
2992
0−
8480
−16
782
174
00
−2
−2
00
30
119
1327
9875
6214
506
−28
930
104
−6
22−
14−
86
2−
70
131
3895
7856
32−
2428
8−
4906
6−
502
0−
8−
6−
64
05
0
143
1091
2966
810
3977
0−
7905
846
610
014
2−
102
4−
2
155
2935
1354
032
−63
888
−12
7484
316
0−
2812
120
0−
110
167
7614
1761
850
1010
18−
2032
64−
1232
−14
0−
48
0−
213
−2
179
1912
2389
1936
−15
7344
−31
3578
1098
056
−6
−6
00
30
191
4663
8960
2756
2417
64−
4828
4271
012
−14
−6
−18
00
−22
0
203
1107
6262
9384
0−
3669
60−
7367
72−
2876
00
−12
−12
100
100
215
2567
2291
2142
855
0676
−10
9887
624
72−
12−
62−
48
64
90
227
5818
5676
7336
0−
8178
40−
1634
074
1658
00
2626
−20
0−
220
239
1291
7927
4058
5212
0306
8−
2412
226
−61
4820
112
3820
00
172
251
2813
5083
7797
92−
1753
840
−35
0248
651
740
−48
−10
−10
−4
014
0
263
6019
4978
1160
0025
3548
8−
5067
686
3382
−24
0−
58−
340
−4
−32
0
275
1266
6085
6741
328
−36
3723
2−
7287
046
−12
634
0−
112
−26
−26
00
320
287
2623
9398
1258
310
5179
526
−10
3485
7010
430
220
3814
20−
211
−2
Page 45 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 18
The
twin
ed s
erie
s fo
r U4(3).
The
tabl
e sh
ows
the
Four
ier c
oeffi
cien
ts m
ulti
plyi
ng q−D/12 in
the q-
expa
nsio
n of
the
func
tion
hg,2(τ)
−D
[g]
1A2A
3A3B
CD4A
B5A
6A6B
C7A
B8A
9ABC
D12
A
−4
11
11
11
11
11
11
821
02
213
−2
05
−1
00
01
2044
44−
497
74
−1
−7
−1
−1
01
1
3242
560
1619
7−
194
013
10
−2
−1
1
4428
1512
−24
577
19−
87
−15
30
0−
21
5614
8196
412
1176
24−
12−
624
01
03
0
6866
4920
0−
1623
13−
8116
0−
31−
15
0−
31
8026
4552
6464
4552
7024
−6
40−
2−
44
−2
0
9295
7314
05−
8384
4070
−27
0−
56−
20
17
0
104
3206
2637
236
1444
0−
248
−36
2272
0−
40
−5
0
116
1006
5671
56−
4425
759
217
44−
14−
891
00
1−
1
128
2990
3386
8016
842
861
183
520
117
30
−6
91
140
8469
1294
48−
216
6990
4−
656
−72
−17
−14
40
30
−5
0
152
2300
0871
960
8811
4066
558
−88
017
8−
210
0−
92
164
6018
6506
768
−11
218
1097
431
112
48−
223
−1
−11
011
1
176
1523
3580
3872
416
2802
08−
1582
144
−28
272
20
8−
100
188
3741
7253
0930
−49
443
6490
1340
−16
60
−32
64
−5
−2
−4
2
200
8943
5292
9498
202
6624
9998
1−
202
−42
403
10
024
−1
212
2085
1575
2830
0−
244
9930
25−
3545
244
0−
487
−1
00
−17
1
224
4751
6756
0102
486
414
8546
229
4628
010
458
2−
69
−12
−6
−2
236
1060
2363
9451
84−
1056
2189
455
2077
−35
2−
51−
705
−3
180
25−
1
248
2319
9658
8165
8042
031
8644
0−
7480
−42
00
840
0−
200
−16
0
260
4985
1590
6540
96−
496
4635
278
6146
496
−84
−99
42
00
−16
−2
272
1053
2310
8387
200
1792
6654
706
4228
608
011
864
−10
1634
2
284
2190
2185
0730
991
−20
9794
7538
3−
1509
9−
697
196
−14
01−
30
3−
30−
1
Page 46 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 19
The
twin
ed s
erie
s fo
r M23. T
he ta
ble
show
s th
e Fo
urie
r coe
ffici
ents
mul
tipl
ying
q−D/24 in
the q-
expa
nsio
n of
the
func
tion
hg,1 2
(τ) .b
p=
(−1+
i√p)/2
−D
[g]
1A2A
3A4A
5A6A
7AB
8A11
AB
14A
B15
AB
23A
23B
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
2377
0−
145
−2
01
00
00
0b23
b23
4713
915
4310
−1
0−
2−
11
01
00
0
7113
2825
−11
921
5−
51
0−
10
01
00
9591
5124
308
314
4−
10
01
01
00
119
5069
867
−69
359
−13
23
−2
−1
00
−1
00
143
2405
3215
1407
85−
90
−3
4−
1−
10
0−
1−
1
167
1012
6854
0−
2772
135
240
32
2−
10
00
0
191
3877
4628
253
0620
014
−18
−4
00
00
00
0
215
1372
9350
90−
9710
300
−38
154
−5
2−
1−
10
00
239
4552
0392
9617
136
414
−20
11−
60
22
0−
10
0
263
1426
5412
315
−29
589
610
630
60
−3
00
01
1
287
4256
8680
715
5015
583
535
0−
5−
6−
10
00
00
311
1216
6594
9240
−83
160
1165
−10
8−
459
10−
20
00
00
335
3346
5824
6604
1351
4815
81−
6034
−11
3−
40
−1
10
0
359
8894
1309
5662
−21
6482
2158
170
2210
04
30
−2
00
383
2291
4821
4883
534
2259
2865
870
−11
−9
10
10
00
407
5739
3332
2767
0−
5336
1038
55−
250
015
02
−2
00
00
431
1400
8317
4239
6882
1296
5051
−12
4−
107
−17
06
−1
01
−1
−1
455
3338
8385
2016
99−
1250
717
6656
371
7916
−11
−5
01
10
0
479
7785
3744
7689
0618
8623
486
4919
056
−19
220
−4
0−
11
1
503
1778
8179
4535
250
−28
1679
811
250
−55
40
228
−4
32
00
0
527
3988
0841
9854
845
4167
709
1443
0−
283
0−
260
−7
00
01
1
551
8784
6157
5586
727
−61
1666
518
581
799
−21
829
−22
70
−2
10
0
575
1903
2414
7816
7799
8909
383
2363
139
515
4−
290
10
01
b23
b23
Page 47 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 20
The
twin
ed s
erie
s fo
r M23. T
he ta
ble
show
s th
e Fo
urie
r coe
ffici
ents
mul
tipl
ying
q−D/24 in
the q-
expa
nsio
n of
the
func
tion
hg,3 2
(τ)
−D
[g]
1A2A
3A4A
5A6A
7AB
8A11
AB
14A
B15
AB
23A
B
−9
11
11
11
11
11
11
1523
17
6−
11
−2
0−
10
01
1
3957
96−
2818
41
20
0−
10
−2
0
6365
505
97−
151
01
−1
10
−1
01
8749
4385
−23
960
−7
04
31
1−
10
0
111
2922
381
525
90−
3−
9−
60
10
00
1
135
1452
5511
−11
13−
7515
6−
30
−1
00
0−
1
159
6344
7087
2255
228
77
−4
−3
−1
01
−2
0
183
2501
8843
5−
4333
360
−29
08
0−
12
00
1
207
9078
7658
579
45−
260
−15
04
0−
30
00
0
231
3073
1558
10−
1417
476
250
−25
10−
32
−1
12
0
255
9804
6607
7724
809
1062
2517
−10
91
−1
12
0
279
2971
7775
186
−42
286
−75
9−
7816
−7
12
01
10
303
8611
6649
220
7030
820
70−
360
−18
04
−3
00
0
327
2398
0659
2730
−11
5046
2880
122
016
−9
−2
1−
10
−1
351
6444
1843
4331
1855
63−
1926
59−
6410
0−
11
0−
10
375
1676
9940
6590
1−
2944
8352
56−
195
4624
0−
30
01
−1
399
4238
7885
8498
746
0571
6948
−10
137
−28
−9
−5
0−
1−
20
423
1043
2762
5252
95−
7119
85−
4645
295
0−
1319
30
−1
00
447
2505
8448
4337
7010
8884
212
120
146
0−
323
24
−1
00
471
5884
8028
3092
24−
1647
128
1591
2−
424
−13
640
04
00
20
495
1353
4935
1964
727
2466
359
−10
281
−20
192
23−
167
−1
0−
10
519
3053
2688
0332
593
−36
6033
526
646
617
6846
0−
7−
20
−4
0
543
6764
3308
3819
185
5388
145
3411
030
50
−50
0−
30
00
0
567
1473
4684
2984
7035
−78
6739
7−
2184
0−
901
0−
32−
15−
5−
51
01
Page 48 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 21
The
twin
ed s
erie
s fo
r McL
. The
tabl
e sh
ows
the
Four
ier c
oeffi
cien
ts m
ulti
plyi
ng q−D/24 in
the q-
expa
nsio
n of
the
func
tion
hg,1 2
(τ) . bp=
(−1+
i√p)/2
−D
[g]
1A2A
3A3B
4A5A
5B6A
6B7A
B8A
9AB
10A
11A
B12
A14
AB
15A,15B
30A,30B
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
2377
0−
14−
135
−2
−5
07
10
0−
11
01
0b15
b15
4713
915
43−
1710
−1
−10
07
−2
−1
11
−2
0−
11
−b15
b15
7113
2825
−11
9−
4221
5−
25−
522
10
−1
01
02
0−b15
b15
9591
5124
308
−68
314
−26
432
−1
00
−2
−2
1−
20
b15
b15
119
5069
867
−69
3−
112
59−
13−
582
603
−2
−1
22
02
0−b15
(b15−
2)
143
2405
3215
1407
−16
785
−9
−85
081
−3
4−
11
−3
−1
−3
0−b15
(b15−
1)
167
1012
6854
0−
2772
−27
913
524
−13
50
141
32
2−
33
−1
30
(b15−
1)
(b15−
1)
191
3877
4628
253
06−
394
200
14−
218
−18
194
−4
00
2−
40
−4
0−2b15
2b15
215
1372
9350
90−
9710
−60
030
0−
38−
285
1530
44
−5
20
5−
14
−1
02b15
239
4552
0392
9617
136
−83
741
4−
20−
404
1141
1−
60
2−
3−
42
−5
0(2b15−
1)
(2b15−
3)
263
1426
5412
315
−29
589
−12
0861
063
−61
00
612
60
−3
46
06
02
(2b15−
2)
287
4256
8680
715
5015
5−
1667
835
35−
835
082
9−
5−
6−
11
−5
0−
70
−b15
(3b15−
2)
311
1216
6594
9240
−83
160
−23
4511
65−
108
−12
10−
4511
799
10−
2−
510
09
0(b
15−
2)
(3b15−
2)
335
3346
5824
6604
1351
48−
3153
1581
−60
−15
4634
1567
−11
3−
43
−12
0−
9−
1(1
−2b15)
(4b15−
1)
359
8894
1309
5662
−21
6482
−43
1321
5817
0−
2138
2221
6710
04
18
311
0b15
(5b15−
3)
383
2291
4821
4883
534
2259
−57
4828
6587
−28
650
2860
−11
−9
1−
6−
110
−12
1(4b15−
1)
(4b15−
3)
407
5739
3332
2767
0−
5336
10−
7692
3855
−25
0−
3855
038
6415
02
615
−2
140
(2−
2b15)
(4b15−
4)
431
1400
8317
4239
6882
1296
−10
096
5051
−12
4−
5157
−10
750
32−
170
62
−19
−1
−16
0(1
−b15)
(5b15−
3)
455
3338
8385
2016
99−
1250
717
−13
333
6656
371
−65
7679
6679
16−
11−
5−
718
017
1(4b15−
1)
(6b15−
3)
479
7785
3744
7689
0618
8623
4−
1728
086
4919
0−
8594
5686
24−
1922
06
−16
−4
−20
0(1
−3b15)
(7b15−
5)
503
1778
8179
4535
250
−28
1679
8−
2250
011
250
−55
4−
1125
00
1127
222
8−
40
223
222
0(8b15−
4)
527
3988
0841
9854
845
4167
709
−28
887
1443
0−
283
−14
430
014
413
−26
0−
7−
9−
260
−25
0(3
−3b15)
(9b15−
5)
551
8784
6157
5586
727
−61
1666
5−
3713
818
581
799
−18
798
−21
818
602
29−
227
830
028
−2
(2−
5b15)
(9b15−
6)
575
1903
2414
7816
7799
8909
383
−47
253
2363
139
5−
2347
615
423
599
−29
01
3−
320
−31
02
(10b15−
6)
Page 49 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 22
The
twin
ed s
erie
s fo
r McL
. The
tabl
e sh
ows
the
Four
ier c
oeffi
cien
ts m
ulti
plyi
ng q−D/24 in
the q-
expa
nsio
n of
the
func
tion
hg,3 2
(τ)
−D
[g]
1A2A
3A3B
4A5A
5B6A
6B7A
B8A
9AB
10A
11A
B12
A14
AB
15A
B30
AB
−9
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
1523
17
156
−1
61
7−
20
−1
02
0−
10
02
3957
96−
2845
184
211
52
00
0−
3−
11
00
0
6365
505
9730
−15
130
022
1−
11
02
0−
2−
10
2
8749
4385
−23
915
060
−7
600
224
31
0−
41
2−
10
2
111
2922
381
525
225
90−
381
−9
57−
60
10
50
−3
00
2
135
1452
5511
−11
1315
9−
7515
161
663
−3
0−
13
−3
03
0−
13
159
6344
7087
2255
570
228
723
77
122
−4
−3
−1
05
0−
21
02
183
2501
8843
5−
4333
900
360
−29
360
016
48
0−
10
−8
24
00
4
207
9078
7658
579
4550
5−
260
−15
510
028
94
0−
3−
510
0−
30
04
231
3073
1558
10−
1417
419
0576
250
735
−25
361
10−
32
0−
9−
15
10
6
255
9804
6607
7724
809
2655
1062
2510
7717
551
−10
91
09
−1
−5
10
6
279
2971
7775
186
−42
286
1518
−75
9−
7815
3616
710
−7
12
0−
160
61
35
303
8611
6649
220
7030
851
7520
70−
3620
700
1071
−18
04
018
−3
−9
00
6
327
2398
0659
2730
−11
5046
7200
2880
122
2880
014
0816
−9
−2
0−
161
8−
10
8
351
6444
1843
4331
1855
6338
79−
1926
5938
06−
6419
9910
0−
19
181
−13
0−
19
375
1676
9940
6590
1−
2944
8313
140
5256
−19
553
0146
2580
240
−3
0−
230
120
010
399
4238
7885
8498
746
0571
1737
069
48−
101
6987
3735
30−
28−
9−
50
310
−14
−1
010
423
1043
2762
5252
95−
7119
8592
60−
4645
295
9270
045
32−
1319
3−
10−
300
16−
10
12
447
2505
8448
4337
7010
8884
230
300
1212
014
612
120
061
24−
323
20
324
−16
−1
014
471
5884
8028
3092
24−
1647
128
3978
015
912
−42
415
774
−13
678
7640
04
0−
380
200
016
495
1353
4935
1964
727
2466
359
2056
2−
1028
1−
201
2065
292
1044
223
−16
70
44−
1−
180
−3
17
519
3053
2688
0332
593
−36
6033
566
615
2664
661
726
718
6813
231
460
−7
0−
50−
223
00
16
543
6764
3308
3819
185
5388
145
8527
534
110
305
3411
00
1715
5−
500
−3
050
0−
250
020
567
1473
4684
2984
7035
−78
6739
743
725
−21
840
−90
143
710
021
637
−32
−15
−5
15−
62−
529
10
22
Page 50 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 23
The
twin
ed s
erie
s fo
r HS.
The
tabl
e sh
ows
the
Four
ier c
oeffi
cien
ts m
ulti
plyi
ng q−D/24 in
the q-
expa
nsio
n of
the
func
tion
hg,1 2
(τ) . ap=
i√p
−D
[g]
1A2A
2B3A
4A4B
C5A
5BC
6A6B
7A8A
BC10
A10
B11
AB
12A
15A
20A,20B
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
2377
0−
1410
5−
10−
2−
50
11
00
10
0−
10
a5
4713
915
43−
4510
−25
−1
−10
00
−2
−1
1−
20
02
00
7113
2825
−11
912
921
−35
5−
25−
53
10
−1
1−
10
11
a5
9591
5124
308
−30
031
−60
4−
264
−3
−1
00
−2
01
−3
10
119
5069
867
−69
366
759
−12
5−
13−
582
13
−2
−1
22
01
−1
0
143
2405
3215
1407
−14
2585
−18
5−
9−
850
−3
−3
4−
1−
30
−1
10
a5
167
1012
6854
0−
2772
2820
135
−24
024
−13
50
33
22
30
−1
−3
0a5
191
3877
4628
253
06−
5278
200
−39
414
−21
8−
18−
4−
40
0−
42
02
0(a
5+
1)
215
1372
9350
90−
9710
9634
300
−63
0−
38−
285
154
4−
52
5−
1−
10
0a5
239
4552
0392
9617
136
−17
176
414
−86
0−
20−
404
11−
4−
60
2−
4−
12
−2
−1
0
263
1426
5412
315
−29
589
2971
561
0−
1145
63−
610
06
60
−3
60
04
00
287
4256
8680
715
5015
5−
5008
583
5−
1645
35−
835
0−
9−
5−
6−
1−
50
0−
10
a5
311
1216
6594
9240
−83
160
8294
411
65−
2420
−10
8−
1210
−45
99
10−
210
−1
0−
50
0
335
3346
5824
6604
1351
48−
1352
6815
81−
3244
−60
−15
4634
−7
−11
3−
4−
122
05
1(a
5+
1)
359
8894
1309
5662
−21
6482
2168
2221
58−
4126
170
−21
3822
1210
04
82
32
−2
(a5−
1)
383
2291
4821
4883
534
2259
−34
2085
2865
−56
6587
−28
650
−13
−11
−9
1−
110
0−
70
a5
407
5739
3332
2767
0−
5336
1053
3110
3855
−79
30−
250
−38
550
1315
02
150
−2
50
a5
431
1400
8317
4239
6882
1296
−82
1544
5051
−10
260
−12
4−
5157
−10
7−
15−
170
6−
191
−1
31
a5
455
3338
8385
2016
99−
1250
717
1251
459
6656
−12
909
371
−65
7679
1816
−11
−5
18−
10
−6
1(a
5+
1)
479
7785
3744
7689
0618
8623
4−
1885
854
8649
−17
146
190
−85
9456
−21
−19
220
−16
−4
−4
5−
1(a
5−
1)
503
1778
8179
4535
250
−28
1679
828
1569
011
250
−23
010
−55
4−
1125
00
2222
8−
422
03
00
2a5
527
3988
0841
9854
845
4167
709
−41
6827
514
430
−29
195
−28
3−
1443
00
−24
−26
0−
7−
260
0−
80
0
551
8784
6157
5586
727
−61
1666
561
1826
318
581
−36
305
799
−18
798
−21
827
29−
227
30−
20
71
2a5
575
1903
2414
7816
7799
8909
383
−89
0859
323
631
−46
925
395
−23
476
154
−33
−29
01
−32
20
11
0
Page 51 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 24
The
twin
ed s
erie
s fo
r HS.
The
tabl
e sh
ows
the
Four
ier c
oeffi
cien
ts m
ulti
plyi
ng q−D/24 in
the q-
expa
nsio
n of
the
func
tion
hg,3 2
(τ)
−D
[g]
1A2A
2B3A
4A4B
C5A
5BC
6A6B
7A8A
BC10
A10
B11
AB
12A
15A
20A
B
−9
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
1523
17
−9
615
−1
61
0−
20
−1
21
00
10
3957
96−
2836
1836
421
10
20
0−
31
−1
0−
21
6365
505
97−
95−
1565
130
0−
51
−1
12
00
−1
00
8749
4385
−23
922
560
105
−7
600
04
31
−4
01
00
0
111
2922
381
525
−53
190
189
−3
81−
90
−6
01
5−
10
00
−1
135
1452
5511
−11
1311
43−
7531
915
161
69
−3
0−
1−
3−
20
10
−1
159
6344
7087
2255
−22
4122
847
17
237
70
−4
−3
−1
5−
10
0−
21
183
2501
8843
5−
4333
4275
360
675
−29
360
00
80
−1
−8
02
00
0
207
9078
7658
579
45−
7975
−26
010
25−
1551
00
−10
40
−3
100
02
00
231
3073
1558
10−
1417
414
274
762
1554
5073
5−
250
10−
32
−9
−1
−1
02
−1
255
9804
6607
7724
809
−24
759
1062
2169
2510
7717
0−
109
19
1−
10
2−
1
279
2971
7775
186
−42
286
4213
0−
759
2930
−78
1536
1619
−7
12
−16
00
−1
10
303
8611
6649
220
7030
8−
7038
020
7041
40−
3620
700
0−
180
418
0−
30
00
327
2398
0659
2730
−11
5046
1152
9028
8058
5012
228
800
016
−9
−2
−16
01
00
0
351
6444
1843
4331
1855
63−
1854
45−
1926
7835
5938
06−
64−
3610
0−
118
01
−4
−1
0
375
1676
9940
6590
1−
2944
8329
4093
5256
1026
9−
195
5301
460
240
−3
−23
−2
00
1−
1
399
4238
7885
8498
746
0571
−46
0773
6948
1385
1−
101
6987
370
−28
−9
−5
31−
30
0−
21
423
1043
2762
5252
95−
7119
8571
2575
−46
4518
775
295
9270
045
−13
193
−30
00
10
0
447
2505
8448
4337
7010
8884
2−
1088
550
1212
024
450
146
1212
00
0−
323
232
04
00
0
471
5884
8028
3092
24−
1647
128
1646
280
1591
231
320
−42
415
774
−13
60
400
4−
380
00
20
495
1353
4935
1964
727
2466
359
−24
6676
1−
1028
141
015
−20
120
652
92−
5923
−16
744
4−
15
−1
0
519
3053
2688
0332
593
−36
6033
536
6156
926
646
5381
761
726
718
680
460
−7
−50
4−
20
−4
2
543
6764
3308
3819
185
5388
145
−53
8753
534
110
6862
530
534
110
00
−50
0−
350
00
00
0
567
1473
4684
2984
7035
−78
6739
778
6559
5−
2184
086
395
−90
143
710
090
−32
−15
−5
−62
0−
5−
20
0
Page 52 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 25
The
twin
ed s
erie
s fo
r U6(2).
The
tabl
e sh
ows
the
Four
ier c
oeffi
cien
ts m
ulti
plyi
ng q−D/24 in
the q-
expa
nsio
n of
the
func
tion
hg,1 2
(τ) -
par
t I. a
p=
i√p
−D
[g]
1A2A
2B2C
3A3B
3C4A
4B4C
DE
4F4G
5A6A,6B
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
2377
0−
30−
1410
5−
135
34−
6−
22
−2
0−
3– 6a3
4713
915
−5
43−
4510
−17
1013
9−
13−
13
−1
0−
5
7113
2825
−19
9−
119
129
21−
4221
505
−15
5−
75
−5
−10−
12a3
9591
5124
180
308
−30
031
−68
3114
12−
284
−4
44
−18−
18a3
119
5069
867
−91
7−
693
667
59−
112
5936
27−
69−
1311
−13
2−
26−
30a3
143
2405
3215
1055
1407
−14
2585
−16
785
8559
−97
−9
7−
90
−43−36a3
167
1012
6854
0−
3300
−27
7228
2013
5−
279
135
1906
8−
108
24−
2024
0−
69−
78a3
191
3877
4628
244
9053
06−
5278
200
−39
420
040
154
−19
014
−14
14−
18−
100−
90a3
215
1372
9350
90−
1089
4−
9710
9634
300
−60
030
081
250
−33
4−
3842
−38
15−
148−
156a3
239
4552
0392
9615
456
1713
6−
1717
641
4−
837
414
1587
36−
440
−20
24−
2011
−21
3−204a3
263
1426
5412
315
−32
005
−29
589
2971
561
0−
1208
610
3009
87−
541
63−
6963
0−
298−
306a3
287
4256
8680
715
4679
550
155
−50
085
835
−16
6783
555
5307
−80
535
−37
350
−41
9− 408a3
311
1216
6594
9240
−87
784
−83
160
8294
411
65−
2345
1165
1001
016
−12
64−
108
104
−10
8−
45−
583−
606a3
335
3346
5824
6604
1287
8013
5148
−13
5268
1581
−31
5315
8117
6738
8−
1652
−60
52−
6034
−79
3− 768a3
359
8894
1309
5662
−22
5074
−21
6482
2168
2221
58−
4313
2158
3062
830
−19
7817
0−
162
170
22−
1073−
1092a3
383
2291
4821
4883
533
0755
3422
59−
3420
8528
65−
5748
2865
5217
427
−27
8987
−85
870
−14
44− 1
428a3
407
5739
3332
2767
0−
5489
70−
5336
1053
3110
3855
−76
9238
5587
5146
2−
4090
−25
025
4−
250
0−
1914−
1938a3
431
1400
8317
4239
6880
1024
8212
96−
8215
4450
51−
1009
650
5114
4731
68−
5192
−12
413
6−
124
−10
7−
2532−
2496a3
455
3338
8385
2016
99−
1277
277
−12
5071
712
5145
966
56−
1333
366
5623
6257
63−
6269
371
−38
137
179
−33
27−
3366a3
479
7785
3744
7689
0618
5156
218
8623
4−
1885
854
8649
−17
280
8649
3810
1658
−84
7819
0−
190
190
56−
4328−
4284a3
503
1778
8179
4535
250
−28
6171
0−
2816
798
2815
690
1125
0−
2250
011
250
6076
2514
−11
782
−55
454
6−
554
0−
5614−
5658a3
527
3988
0841
9854
845
4109
885
4167
709
−41
6827
514
430
−28
887
1443
095
8953
25−
1473
9−
283
269
−28
30
−72
37−
7194a3
551
8784
6157
5586
727
−61
9087
3−
6116
665
6118
263
1858
1−
3713
818
581
1498
7243
9−
1775
379
9−
785
799
−21
8−
9268−
9318a3
575
1903
2414
7816
7799
8814
743
8909
383
−89
0859
323
631
−47
253
2363
123
2094
167
−23
265
395
−39
339
515
4−
1182
7− 11766a3
Page 53 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 26
The
twin
ed s
erie
s fo
r U6(2).
The
tabl
e sh
ows
the
Four
ier c
oeffi
cien
ts m
ulti
plyi
ng q−D/24 in
the q-
expa
nsio
n of
the
func
tion
hg,1 2
(τ) -
par
t II. ap=
i√p
−D
[g]
6C6D
6E6F
6G6H
7A8A
8BCD
9ABC
10A
11A
B12A,12B
12C
12D,12E
12FG
H12
I15
A18A,18B
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
−1
23−
37
1−
31
10
20
−1
00
−2+
3a3
1a3
1−
10
−a3
47−
147
−2
4−
20
−1
−1
11
00
−5+
6a3
−2
−1−
2a3
−1
00
1
71−
1922
1−
11
30
1−
10
10
−8+
12a3
10
2−
11
−1+
a3
95−
3332
−1
−3
−1
−3
00
0−
20
1−
19+
15a3
−1
−1+
a3
−2
−1
10
119
−53
603
13
1−
23
−1
2−
20
−27+
27a3
33+
a3
2−
1−
11+
a3
143
−91
81−
35
−3
−3
4−
5−
11
0−
1−
45+
42a3
-3−
1−2 a
3−
31
0−
1
167
−12
914
13
−9
33
24
2−
30
−1
−66+
69a3
33 a
33
10
−a3
191
−20
819
4−
48
−4
−4
0−
20
20
0−
103+
99a3
-4−
1−3 a
3−
4−
20
2
215
−29
230
44
−4
44
−5
62
01
−1
−14
6+ 150a3
42+
2 a3
40
0−
1+a3
239
−42
641
1−
60
−6
−4
0−
42
−3
12
−21
3+ 210a3
−6
−5−
2 a3
−5
0−
1−a3
263
−59
861
26
26
60
3−
34
00
−29
7+ 303a3
65+
a3
60
02
287
−84
582
9−
57
−5
−9
−6
−5
−1
10
0−
425+
414a3
−5
−1−
2 a3
−7
−1
0−
2+a3
311
−11
4711
799
−19
99
108
−2
−5
10
−57
6+ 585a3
92+
7 a3
9−
10
−1−
2 a3
335
−16
0315
67−
1117
−11
−7
3−
16−
43
00
−79
7+ 792a3
−11
−5−
8 a3
−9
11
2+a3
359
−21
3821
6710
−8
1012
014
41
−4
3−
1067+
1080a3
105+
4 a3
110
−2
−2+
a3
383
−28
8728
60−
11−
1−
11−
13−
9−
91
−6
00
−14
48+
1434a3
−11
−8−
2 a3
−12
−1
0−
1−a3
407
−38
2538
6415
−3
1513
018
26
0−
2−
1911+
1923a3
1511+
5 a3
14−
10
3+a3
431
−50
8550
32−
1721
−17
−15
0−
126
2−
1−
1−
2540+
2526a3
−17
−8−
10a3
−16
11
−3+
a3
455
−66
2466
7916
−30
1618
−11
11−
5−
73
0−
3314+
3333a3
164+
11a3
170
1−
3 a3
479
−86
8786
24−
1931
−19
−21
22−
180
62
−4
−43
42+
4320a3
−19
−6−
12a3
−20
−1
−1
4
503
−11
206
1127
222
−22
2222
818
−4
00
3−
5603+
5625a3
2211+
11a3
220
0−
4+2 a
3
527
−14
482
1441
3−
268
−26
−24
0−
35−
7−
90
0−
7244+
7221a3
−26
−18−
9 a3
−25
20
−1−
2 a3
551
−18
523
1860
229
−13
2927
−22
357
82
0−
9259+
9285a3
2919+
11a3
281
15+
a3
575
−23
689
2359
9−
2935
−29
−33
0−
251
3−
20
−11
846+
11811a3
−29
−12−
15a3
−31
−3
1−
4+a3
Page 54 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 27
The
twin
ed s
erie
s fo
r U6(2).
The
tabl
e sh
ows
the
Four
ier c
oeffi
cien
ts m
ulti
plyi
ng q−D/24 in
the q-
expa
nsio
n of
the
func
tion
hg,3 2
(τ) -
par
t I
−D
[g]
1A2A
2B2C
3A3B
3C4A
4B4C
DE
4F4G
5A6A
B6C
6D
−9
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
1523
139
7−
96
156
237
−1
−1
−1
13
67
3957
9636
−28
3618
4518
8420
4−
44
19
185
6365
505
225
97−
95−
1530
−15
353
331
11
018
3322
8749
4385
−15
−23
922
560
150
6099
349
−7
9−
70
3060
22
111
2922
381
909
525
−53
190
225
9026
8593
−3
5−
3−
945
9057
135
1452
5511
−50
5−
1113
1143
−75
159
−75
6487
167
15−
1715
671
149
63
159
6344
7087
3183
2255
−22
4122
857
022
814
719
239
7−
97
711
422
812
2
183
2501
8843
5−
2925
−43
3342
7536
090
036
031
395
323
−29
27−
290
180
360
164
207
9078
7658
510
025
7945
−79
75−
260
505
−26
064
553
505
−15
9−
150
269
524
289
231
3073
1558
10−
1116
6−
1417
414
274
762
1905
762
1274
9080
250
−46
50−
2538
176
236
1
255
9804
6607
7729
097
2480
9−
2475
910
6226
5510
6224
3945
1097
25−
2325
1753
110
6255
1
279
2971
7775
186
−36
270
−42
286
4213
0−
759
1518
−75
945
3842
1426
−78
82−
7816
738
1497
710
303
8611
6649
220
7866
070
308
−70
380
2070
5175
2070
8245
9620
52−
3644
−36
010
3520
7010
71
327
2398
0659
2730
−10
3590
−11
5046
1152
9028
8072
0028
8014
6557
829
8612
2−
126
122
014
4028
8014
08
351
6444
1843
4331
2011
1518
5563
−18
5445
−19
2638
79−
1926
2555
051
3947
59−
6159
−64
1963
3898
1999
375
1676
9940
6590
1−
2735
55−
2944
8329
4093
5256
1314
052
5643
7607
750
37−
195
189
−19
546
2628
5256
2580
399
4238
7885
8498
748
8475
4605
71−
4607
7369
4817
370
6948
7377
627
6875
−10
191
−10
137
3474
6948
3530
423
1043
2762
5252
95−
6750
25−
7119
8571
2575
−46
4592
60−
4645
1225
7551
9535
295
−28
929
50
4592
9227
4532
447
2505
8448
4337
7011
3745
010
8884
2−
1088
550
1212
030
300
1212
020
0933
0612
298
146
−14
214
60
6060
1212
061
24
471
5884
8028
3092
24−
1583
640
−16
4712
816
4628
015
912
3978
015
912
3253
1448
1544
8−
424
432
−42
4−
136
7956
1591
278
76
495
1353
4935
1964
727
2548
791
2466
359
−24
6676
1−
1028
120
562
−10
281
5207
0711
2040
7−
201
215
−20
192
1035
020
631
1044
2
519
3053
2688
0332
593
−35
5393
5−
3660
335
3661
569
2664
666
615
2664
682
4581
4527
217
617
−63
161
768
1332
326
646
1323
1
543
6764
3308
3819
185
5524
785
5388
145
−53
8753
534
110
8527
534
110
1292
8092
934
465
305
−31
130
50
1705
534
110
1715
5
567
1473
4684
2984
7035
−76
9280
5−
7867
397
7865
595
−21
840
4372
5−
2184
020
0804
347
4274
7−
901
891
−90
10
2176
143
616
2163
7
Page 55 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 28
The
twin
ed s
erie
s fo
r U6(2).
The
tabl
e sh
ows
the
Four
ier c
oeffi
cien
ts m
ulti
plyi
ng q−D/24 in
the q-
expa
nsio
n of
the
func
tion
hg,3 2
(τ) -
par
t II
−D
[g]
6E6F
6G6H
7A8A
8BCD
9ABC
10A
11A
B12
AB
12C
12D
E12
FGH
12I
15A
18A
B
−9
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
1
15−
20
−2
00
3−
10
−1
05
21
−1
21
0
392
02
00
00
01
−1
3−
6−
11
2−
20
631
31
−5
−1
11
00
020
50
−2
10
0
874
04
03
−3
10
01
300
−2
20
00
111
−6
0−
60
09
10
−1
039
−6
3−
32
00
135
−3
−7
−3
90
−5
−1
30
079
1−
13
10
−1
159
−4
0−
40
−3
3−
10
30
130
162
−2
0−
20
183
80
80
0−
9−
10
02
156
−24
−4
40
00
207
414
4−
100
9−
3−
50
027
520
7−
30
0−
1
231
100
100
−3
−6
20
−1
−1
383
2−
55
22
0
255
−10
0−
100
99
10
−3
−1
513
−18
5−
5−
22
0
279
−7
−21
−7
191
−14
20
00
764
5−
86
11
0
303
−18
0−
180
024
40
0−
310
6934
9−
92
00
327
160
160
−9
−18
−2
00
113
68−
72−
88
00
0
351
1028
10−
360
15−
19
01
1985
505
−13
2−
11
375
240
240
0−
27−
30
00
2644
16−
1212
01
0
399
−28
0−
280
−9
27−
50
50
3414
−60
14−
144
−2
0
423
−13
−43
−13
4519
−25
3−
100
046
5419
−14
16−
10
2
447
−32
0−
320
330
20
04
6152
9216
−16
−4
00
471
400
400
0−
364
00
077
88−
168
−20
200
20
495
2369
23−
59−
1655
70
−4
−1
1040
011
928
−18
−1
−1
0
519
460
460
0−
51−
70
0−
213
357
34−
2323
2−
40
543
−50
0−
500
045
−3
00
016
917
−13
825
−25
−2
00
567
−32
−94
−32
90−
15−
69−
515
0−
521
907
52−
3329
00
−1
Page 56 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 29
The
tabl
e sh
ows
the
deco
mpo
siti
on o
f the
Fou
rier
coe
ffici
ents
mul
tipl
ying
q−D/12 in
the
func
tion
hg,1(τ) i
nto
irre
duci
ble
repr
esen
tati
ons χ
n o
f M22
−D
χ1
χ2
χ3
χ4
χ5
χ6
χ7
χ8
χ9
χ10
χ11
χ12
−1
−2
00
00
00
00
00
0
110
00
00
00
00
11
0
230
00
02
24
46
44
8
350
28
86
1622
3432
4848
60
472
2642
4260
100
160
208
232
268
268
380
592
9222
822
825
848
073
810
2811
3213
9413
9419
00
7126
472
952
952
1204
2130
3334
4508
4966
5966
5966
8240
8378
1710
3754
3754
4516
8192
1270
817
410
1911
223
284
2328
431
928
9530
062
2013
194
1319
416
254
2914
845
402
6175
268
016
8221
882
218
1132
16
107
950
2022
843
616
4361
653
078
9574
414
8822
2032
0422
3388
2711
6027
1160
3725
64
119
3040
6308
013
4624
1346
2416
4946
2965
3646
1482
6288
6869
1920
8380
7683
8076
1152
800
131
8706
1841
0039
5460
3954
6048
2650
8694
0813
5205
818
4442
820
2865
224
5995
224
5995
233
8172
4
143
2472
051
7270
1106
932
1106
932
1354
036
2436
238
3790
274
5167
368
5684
522
6888
684
6888
684
9473
140
155
6601
613
8893
029
7851
829
7851
836
3864
665
5114
810
1897
9413
8971
1415
2859
6818
5312
3618
5312
3625
4784
20
167
1719
0436
0640
877
2463
277
2463
294
4399
016
9967
1826
4407
0836
0523
9639
6591
1448
0671
5648
0671
5666
0956
08
179
4307
8290
5221
619
4030
0419
4030
0423
7104
4242
6826
6466
3931
0690
5408
8899
5928
2812
0725
462
1207
2546
216
5992
492
191
1052
210
2208
6048
4731
8486
4731
8486
5784
0438
1041
0671
416
1947
152
2208
2972
824
2915
594
2944
3286
229
4432
862
4048
5268
0
203
2496
320
5243
9410
1123
8378
011
2383
780
1373
4767
824
7235
148
3845
8282
652
4442
118
5768
8224
469
9266
588
6992
6658
896
1480
364
215
5789
798
1215
6177
026
0469
430
2604
6943
031
8366
892
5730
4653
089
1413
422
1215
5471
6813
3710
8322
1620
7140
5216
2071
4052
2228
4987
96
227
1311
6978
2754
8985
059
0364
314
5903
6431
472
1533
716
1298
7810
3220
2031
4748
2754
9995
1030
3048
8952
3673
3552
6436
7335
5264
5050
8377
68
239
2912
8906
6116
5946
613
1065
6938
1310
6569
3816
0194
7284
2883
4753
1644
8542
2600
6116
4486
4867
2810
9656
8155
2319
6881
5523
1968
1121
3482
124
App
endi
x D
: Dec
ompo
siti
on ta
bles
See
Tabl
es 2
9, 3
0, 3
1, 3
2, 3
3, 3
4, 3
5, 3
6, 3
7, 3
8, 3
9, 4
0, 4
1, 4
2, 4
3, 4
4, 4
5, 4
6, 4
7, 4
8, 4
9, 5
0, 5
1, 5
2, 5
3, 5
4, 5
5, 5
6, 5
7, 5
8, 5
9, 6
0.
Page 57 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 30
The
tabl
e sh
ows
the
deco
mpo
siti
on o
f the
Fou
rier
coe
ffici
ents
mul
tipl
ying
q−D/12 in
the
func
tion
hg,2(τ) i
nto
irre
duci
ble
repr
esen
tati
ons χ
n o
f M22
−D
χ1
χ2
χ3
χ4
χ5
χ6
χ7
χ8
χ9
χ10
χ11
χ12
−4
10
00
00
00
00
00
80
00
00
00
10
00
0
200
11
11
12
21
33
4
320
15
55
1015
1824
2626
38
442
1528
2835
6196
136
147
179
179
242
562
7014
914
918
433
251
670
677
093
693
612
84
6815
310
675
675
821
1486
2307
3138
3468
4196
4196
5778
8062
1260
2686
2686
3286
5906
9192
1252
813
770
1670
216
702
2296
4
9221
545
3597
1197
1111
871
2136
733
238
4533
849
855
6044
060
440
8309
4
104
716
1516
232
528
3252
839
754
7156
211
1316
1517
9816
7022
2024
0820
2408
2783
32
116
2277
4767
810
2132
1021
3212
4829
2246
8434
9513
4766
0452
4228
6354
6663
5466
8737
48
128
6752
1416
1130
3407
3034
0737
0835
6674
9010
3832
514
1588
615
5745
218
8784
218
8784
225
9577
4
140
1906
740
0933
8592
8185
9281
1050
214
1890
431
2940
645
4009
962
4411
059
5346
659
5346
659
7351
704
152
5187
010
8909
623
3368
223
3368
228
5230
251
3412
479
8642
610
8906
2811
9795
8414
5207
6614
5207
6619
9659
96
164
1357
3128
4979
461
0659
961
0659
974
6362
113
4344
7820
8980
9928
4974
1431
3471
0037
9965
4637
9965
4652
2452
18
176
3434
3672
1275
015
4561
5815
4561
5818
8908
1834
0035
4052
8943
5872
1285
3879
3416
8496
1715
4196
1715
4113
2236
044
188
8436
6217
7165
9237
9639
2337
9639
2346
4003
8883
5206
4412
9921
032
1771
6516
419
4881
422
2362
2008
023
6220
080
3248
0245
2
200
2016
488
4234
6314
9074
1956
9074
1956
1109
0688
619
9632
354
3105
3924
042
3462
681
4658
0875
056
4616
772
5646
1677
277
6347
956
212
4701
307
9872
8774
2115
6227
421
1562
274
2585
7598
746
5436
954
7240
1294
198
7290
154
1086
0198
1413
1638
7235
1316
3872
3518
1003
2796
224
1071
3686
2249
8494
648
2109
963
4821
0996
358
9245
588
1060
6418
7416
4988
7462
2249
8466
0024
7483
0808
2999
7952
6629
9979
5266
4124
7182
68
236
2390
5058
5020
0598
510
7572
6834
1075
7268
3413
1477
7297
2366
5990
9136
8137
6388
5020
0589
2055
2206
4385
6693
4116
6166
9341
1661
9203
4407
74
248
5230
7782
1098
4680
3623
5386
1448
2353
8614
4828
7694
1610
5178
4952
5680
5543
6866
1098
4686
398
1208
3156
304
1464
6249
036
1464
6249
036
2013
8593
100
260
1124
0007
023
6039
7820
5057
9942
3250
5799
4232
6181
9930
6611
1275
8722
817
3095
8029
423
6039
7326
425
9643
6954
831
4719
6397
831
4719
6397
843
2739
4992
4
Page 58 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 31
The
tab
le s
how
s th
e de
com
posi
tion
of t
he F
ouri
er c
oeffi
cien
ts m
ulti
plyi
ng q
−D/12 in
the
func
tion
hg,1(τ) i
nto
irre
duci
ble
repr
esen
tati
ons χn o
f U4(3) -
pa
rt I
−D
χ1
χ2
χ3
χ4
χ5
χ6
χ7
χ8
χ9
χ10
−1
−2
00
00
00
00
0
110
00
00
00
00
0
230
00
00
00
00
0
350
00
00
24
47
7
470
64
414
2222
2634
34
590
1220
2052
8212
013
218
918
9
714
7210
210
227
042
253
260
680
180
1
838
232
380
380
984
1548
2112
2344
3164
3164
9538
860
1398
1398
3618
5622
7492
8350
1112
511
125
107
124
2748
4554
4554
1173
218
306
2478
427
532
3683
436
834
119
420
8640
1422
814
228
3667
657
060
7667
485
316
1137
0611
3706
131
1156
2497
241
622
4162
210
7060
1666
7822
5288
2502
6033
4074
3340
74
143
3368
7044
611
6944
1169
4430
0968
4681
7663
1070
7015
1293
5210
9352
10
155
8908
1885
9231
4208
3142
0880
8100
1257
446
1698
156
1886
748
2516
637
2516
637
167
2335
049
0188
8159
8481
5984
2098
802
3264
774
4405
146
4895
338
6526
850
6526
850
179
5838
812
2927
620
4845
020
4845
052
6778
881
9533
411
0651
4412
2944
2016
3949
4816
3949
48
191
1429
3630
0048
049
9813
449
9813
412
8538
1419
9948
4226
9872
7829
9877
5439
9829
0139
9829
01
203
3386
6471
2112
411
8681
8611
8681
8630
5188
3247
4759
4264
0962
8871
2174
1294
9623
2094
9623
20
215
7863
8216
5110
0227
5122
3027
5122
3070
7490
8011
0054
184
1485
5999
016
5070
996
2200
9286
922
0092
869
227
1780
628
3741
1832
6235
1670
6235
1670
1603
3454
424
9414
368
3367
1723
237
4129
064
4988
5130
949
8851
309
239
3955
942
8307
0266
1384
3786
613
8437
866
3559
9006
055
3762
164
7475
5092
483
0621
184
1107
4914
2711
0749
1427
251
8612
692
1809
0595
230
1506
846
3015
0684
677
5306
952
1206
0439
8016
2817
6080
1809
0820
3224
1213
6251
2412
1362
51
263
1843
2618
3870
7255
064
5093
274
6450
9327
416
5882
6474
2580
3968
3034
8347
5608
3870
5481
6651
6072
2937
5160
7229
37
275
3877
7988
8144
2566
413
5737
1466
1357
3714
6634
9039
0608
5429
5186
6073
2988
6448
8144
3121
1210
8591
3941
710
8591
3941
7
287
8034
5934
1687
2376
7828
1200
6070
2812
0060
7072
3090
3886
1124
8072
954
1518
4775
484
1687
2013
154
2249
6001
167
2249
6001
167
Page 59 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 32
The
tab
le s
how
s th
e de
com
posi
tion
of t
he F
ouri
er c
oeffi
cien
ts m
ulti
plyi
ng q
−D/12 in
the
func
tion
hg,1(τ) i
nto
irre
duci
ble
repr
esen
tati
ons χn o
f U4(3) -
pa
rt II
−D
χ11
χ12
χ13
χ14
χ15
χ16
χ17
χ18
χ19
χ20
−1
00
00
00
00
00
110
00
00
10
00
0
230
02
22
12
22
2
357
76
610
1614
1416
16
4734
3446
4662
7486
8610
011
6
5918
918
920
620
629
039
143
243
248
059
6
7180
180
193
493
412
4216
2618
6418
6421
3025
86
8331
6431
6435
3235
3247
5663
7972
1672
1681
9210
064
9511
125
1112
512
636
1263
616
856
2234
525
568
2556
829
148
3572
8
107
3683
436
834
4134
641
346
5527
873
819
8413
684
136
9574
411
7656
119
1137
0611
3706
1282
7012
8270
1710
2222
7677
2602
7426
0274
2965
3636
4172
131
3340
7433
4074
3755
9037
5590
5012
5866
8609
7635
0076
3500
8694
0810
6856
0
143
9352
1093
5210
1053
068
1053
068
1404
072
1871
144
2138
648
2138
648
2436
238
2993
494
155
2516
637
2516
637
2830
546
2830
546
3775
230
5034
454
5751
956
5751
956
6551
148
8051
776
167
6526
850
6526
850
7345
188
7345
188
9793
632
1305
5603
1492
1266
1492
1266
1699
6718
2088
8326
179
1639
4948
1639
4948
1844
2654
1844
2654
2459
3074
3279
2777
3747
3264
3747
3264
4268
2664
5246
0200
191
3998
2901
3998
2901
4498
6624
4498
6624
5998
2140
7997
0261
9139
5836
9139
5836
1041
0671
412
7950
562
203
9496
2320
9496
2320
1068
2884
610
6828
846
1424
4537
818
9931
510
2170
5497
021
7054
970
2472
3514
830
3871
648
215
2200
9286
922
0092
869
2476
1781
224
7617
812
3301
5697
644
0195
866
5030
8382
650
3083
826
5730
4653
070
4309
074
227
4988
5130
949
8851
309
5611
9917
256
1199
172
7482
8063
699
7717
729
1140
2271
3611
4022
7136
1298
7810
3215
9630
5804
239
1107
4914
2711
0749
1427
1245
9572
2412
4595
7224
1661
2765
5622
1500
5306
2531
4411
9825
3144
1198
2883
4753
1635
4400
0144
251
2412
1362
5124
1213
6251
2713
6349
0427
1363
4904
3618
2121
3648
2430
4831
5513
4446
8055
1344
4680
6280
1389
3677
1879
6324
263
5160
7229
3751
6072
2937
5805
8748
6058
0587
4860
7741
1663
4010
3214
9273
111
7960
0499
611
7960
0499
613
4363
9885
216
5143
6929
2
275
1085
9139
417
1085
9139
417
1221
6494
216
1221
6494
216
1628
8726
840
2171
8346
527
2482
0871
652
2482
0871
652
2827
2484
272
3474
9166
956
287
2249
6001
167
2249
6001
167
2530
8126
986
2530
8126
986
3374
4168
882
4499
2097
964
5141
9567
602
5141
9567
602
5857
0125
574
7198
7317
446
Page 60 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 33
The
tab
le s
how
s th
e de
com
posi
tion
of t
he F
ouri
er c
oeffi
cien
ts m
ulti
plyi
ng q
−D/12 in
the
func
tion
hg,2(τ) i
nto
irre
duci
ble
repr
esen
tati
ons χn o
f U4(3) -
pa
rt I
−D
χ1
χ2
χ3
χ4
χ5
χ6
χ7
χ8
χ9
χ10
−4
10
00
00
00
00
80
00
00
00
10
0
200
00
01
11
01
1
320
01
12
14
33
3
441
24
48
1416
2126
26
560
818
1842
6492
104
129
129
683
3774
7418
528
539
642
857
357
3
8010
170
288
288
742
1142
1558
1720
2276
2276
9230
606
1038
1038
2648
4114
5574
6189
8226
8226
104
9820
4034
5834
5888
5213
740
1861
620
668
2750
527
505
116
315
6453
1082
010
820
2778
543
187
5837
464
812
8634
986
349
128
932
1920
032
105
3210
582
484
1282
3117
3260
1924
4325
6447
2564
47
140
2585
5434
390
862
9086
223
3470
3630
7249
0425
5447
9272
6201
7262
01
152
7068
1478
0224
6650
2466
5063
4020
9860
9613
3159
414
7942
619
7215
719
7215
7
164
1847
938
6845
6452
4664
5246
1658
877
2580
201
3483
848
3870
656
5160
351
5160
351
176
4667
897
9182
1632
930
1632
930
4198
392
6530
326
8817
060
9796
194
1306
0772
1306
0772
188
1146
4424
0553
040
1050
440
1050
410
3118
6616
0400
8021
6554
9224
0610
7832
0800
5632
0800
56
200
2739
5857
5007
695
8545
695
8545
624
6469
9638
3387
6851
7596
0457
5097
4776
6774
9676
6774
96
212
6385
8713
4064
7722
3474
5222
3474
5257
4628
3589
3850
1712
0673
444
1340
7984
017
8770
283
1787
7028
3
224
1455
274
3055
2132
5092
4466
5092
4466
1309
4583
020
3691
226
2749
8813
630
5540
174
4073
8219
040
7382
190
236
3246
731
6817
1414
1136
2573
011
3625
730
2921
7608
445
4492
898
6135
7280
868
1744
339
9089
8565
190
8985
651
248
7103
972
1491
7115
424
8629
024
2486
2902
463
9325
160
9945
0069
213
4258
7586
1491
7588
8019
8900
2072
1989
0020
72
260
1526
5066
3205
4326
653
4252
608
5342
5260
813
7378
3498
2136
9895
5828
8495
1508
3205
4946
0842
7397
8516
4273
9785
16
272
3225
0408
6772
2534
011
2872
8962
1128
7289
6229
0243
2966
4514
8853
9660
9511
8216
6772
3433
5490
2977
0416
9029
7704
16
284
6706
4204
1408
3090
5323
4721
2278
2347
2122
7860
3566
9290
9388
8040
8412
6749
1931
714
0832
2860
218
7776
0945
518
7776
0945
5
Page 61 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 34
The
tab
le s
how
s th
e de
com
posi
tion
of t
he F
ouri
er c
oeffi
cien
ts m
ulti
plyi
ng q
−D/12 in
the
func
tion
hg,1(τ) i
nto
irre
duci
ble
repr
esen
tati
ons χn o
f U4(3) -
pa
rt II
−D
χ11
χ12
χ13
χ14
χ15
χ16
χ17
χ18
χ19
χ20
−4
00
00
00
00
00
80
00
00
00
00
0
201
10
00
01
11
1
323
33
35
68
810
14
4426
2627
2731
4654
5461
81
5612
912
914
214
218
224
828
928
933
241
0
6857
357
363
663
684
211
2412
9912
9914
8618
42
8022
7622
7625
4425
4433
7245
1251
7851
7859
0672
78
9282
2682
2692
2392
2312
251
1636
618
749
1874
921
367
2630
5
104
2750
527
505
3090
230
902
4114
254
888
6281
262
812
7156
288
062
116
8634
986
349
9704
497
044
1292
6817
2448
1972
1419
7214
2246
8427
6276
128
2564
4725
6447
2883
5128
8351
3842
7351
2502
5859
3858
5938
6674
9082
0618
140
7262
0172
6201
8167
4481
6744
1088
680
1451
756
1659
543
1659
543
1890
431
2323
911
152
1972
157
1972
157
2218
282
2218
282
2957
154
3943
264
4507
162
4507
162
5134
124
6310
848
164
5160
351
5160
351
5804
744
5804
744
7738
814
1031
8996
1179
4091
1179
4091
1343
4478
1651
3050
176
1306
0772
1306
0772
1469
2426
1469
2426
1958
8686
2611
9004
2985
1826
2985
1826
3400
3540
4179
4712
188
3208
0056
3208
0056
3608
8522
3608
8522
4811
5930
6415
6020
7332
3427
7332
3427
8352
0644
1026
5596
2
200
7667
7496
7667
7496
8625
9890
8625
9890
1150
1006
615
3348
868
1752
5931
617
5259
316
1996
3235
424
5367
882
212
1787
7028
317
8770
283
2011
1315
220
1113
152
2681
4642
435
7531
400
4086
1270
640
8612
706
4654
3695
457
2065
334
224
4073
8219
040
7382
190
4582
9975
845
8299
758
6110
5941
081
4750
620
9311
5130
993
1151
309
1060
6418
7413
0362
2708
236
9089
8565
190
8985
651
1022
6012
1310
2260
1213
1363
4580
0918
1795
0926
2077
6697
2020
7766
9720
2366
5990
9129
0875
3703
248
1989
0020
7219
8900
2072
2237
6164
5022
3761
6450
2983
4740
9039
7797
4852
4546
2740
8845
4627
4088
5178
4952
5663
6480
7716
260
4273
9785
1642
7397
8516
4808
2095
6848
0820
9568
6410
9244
4485
4791
3920
9769
0687
9697
6906
8796
1112
7587
228
1367
6730
320
272
9029
7704
1690
2977
0416
1015
8468
546
1015
8468
546
1354
4593
866
1805
9479
228
2063
9439
888
2063
9439
888
2350
9622
436
2889
5264
904
284
1877
7609
455
1877
7609
455
2112
4777
990
2112
4777
990
2816
6327
222
3755
5131
344
4292
0200
803
4292
0200
803
4888
8805
889
6008
8352
145
Page 62 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 35
The
tab
le s
how
s th
e de
com
posi
tion
of
the
Four
ier
coeffi
cien
ts m
ulti
plyi
ng q
−D/24 in
the
fun
ctio
n hg,1 2
(τ) i
nto
irre
duci
ble
repr
esen
tati
ons χn o
f M
23 -
part
I
−D
χ1
χ2
χ3
χ4
χ5
χ6
χ7
χ8
χ9
−1
−1
00
00
00
00
230
00
00
00
00
470
00
01
10
00
710
01
13
32
24
951
44
424
2321
2124
119
010
2323
110
115
113
113
122
143
357
104
104
555
552
547
547
604
167
1121
745
045
022
6622
8922
8322
8325
00
191
4085
117
0517
0587
9288
0087
8987
8996
46
215
132
2945
6066
6066
3088
331
076
3106
231
062
3400
2
239
455
9865
2006
120
061
1027
8410
3141
1031
1910
3119
1129
80
263
1393
3071
762
965
6296
532
1420
3229
8032
2951
3229
5135
3668
287
4196
9193
818
7731
1877
3196
0228
9641
2396
4080
9640
8010
5601
8
311
1189
826
2221
5368
0053
6800
2742
534
2754
938
2754
882
2754
882
3017
118
335
3286
572
2082
1476
142
1476
142
7546
650
7578
723
7578
641
7578
641
8300
712
359
8712
919
1774
039
2375
939
2375
920
0518
0520
1401
9720
1400
9220
1400
9222
0578
24
383
2247
7849
4277
910
1081
5010
1081
5051
6687
0051
8914
3351
8912
8751
8912
8756
8340
66
407
5624
4312
3766
6825
3187
9225
3187
9212
9399
884
1299
6552
912
9965
340
1299
6534
014
2342
008
431
1373
557
3021
3098
6179
4663
6179
4663
3158
5095
131
7219
639
3172
1938
231
7219
382
3474
3251
6
455
3272
651
7200
4775
1472
8924
614
7289
246
7527
9447
575
6074
520
7560
7419
175
6074
191
8280
7894
0
479
7632
762
1679
0846
434
3437
978
3434
3797
817
5537
6093
1762
9976
1017
6299
7173
1762
9971
7319
3090
5618
503
1743
6751
3836
2443
878
4701
896
7847
0189
640
1065
9821
4028
1134
0140
2811
2844
4028
1128
4444
1173
7282
527
3909
6804
8601
0367
917
5927
8672
1759
2786
7289
9192
7075
9030
9991
1790
3099
8389
9030
9983
8998
9110
2068
551
8611
3417
1894
5295
1338
7520
7902
3875
2079
0219
8065
3365
319
8926
8336
819
8926
8244
619
8926
8244
621
7872
1203
2
575
1865
7820
841
0466
4777
8395
8534
5083
9585
3450
4291
2264
213
4309
8789
349
4309
8788
160
4309
8788
160
4720
3452
886
Page 63 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 36
The
tab
le s
how
s th
e de
com
posi
tion
of
the
Four
ier
coeffi
cien
ts m
ulti
plyi
ng q
−D/24 in
the
fun
ctio
n hg,1 2
(τ) i
nto
irre
duci
ble
repr
esen
tati
ons χn o
f M
23 -
part
II
−D
χ10
χ11
χ12
χ13
χ14
χ15
χ16
χ17
−1
00
00
00
00
231
00
00
00
0
471
11
11
12
3
7111
1111
1114
1412
26
9568
6880
8087
8796
182
119
389
389
444
444
496
496
508
1003
143
1811
1811
2111
2111
2324
2324
2454
4777
167
7661
7661
8892
8892
9848
9848
1024
620
084
191
2924
529
245
3405
234
052
3759
637
596
3939
476
950
215
1036
9510
3695
1205
8612
0586
1333
0613
3306
1392
0427
2375
239
3435
2534
3525
3998
1939
9819
4416
5844
1658
4620
2890
3231
263
1076
965
1076
965
1252
987
1252
987
1384
656
1384
656
1447
084
2830
347
287
3212
975
3212
975
3738
996
3738
996
4130
944
4130
944
4319
566
8446
311
311
9184
195
9184
195
1068
6484
1068
6484
1180
8192
1180
8192
1234
3520
2413
9819
335
2526
0382
2526
0382
2939
4631
2939
4631
3247
7570
3247
7570
3395
6132
6640
0838
359
6713
6828
6713
6828
7812
1437
7812
1437
8631
8725
8631
8725
9023
8598
1764
7019
4
383
1729
6644
817
2966
448
2012
7197
420
1271
974
2223
8534
522
2385
345
2324
9959
645
4660
159
407
4332
2552
043
3225
520
5041
1350
550
4113
505
5570
0406
555
7004
065
5823
1336
011
3875
4982
431
1057
3869
7910
5738
6979
1230
4186
2712
3041
8627
1359
4973
4813
5949
7348
1421
3066
9427
7943
0485
455
2520
2652
2225
2026
5222
2932
6643
4629
3266
4346
3240
3408
1432
4034
0814
3387
6076
7866
2467
5836
479
5876
6317
6558
7663
1765
6838
2733
9768
3827
3397
7555
6691
3175
5566
9131
7899
1407
6815
4471
7714
8
503
1342
7082
844
1342
7082
844
1562
4224
127
1562
4224
127
1726
3391
744
1726
3391
744
1804
8043
408
3529
3998
406
527
3010
3271
271
3010
3271
271
3502
9285
569
3502
9285
569
3870
4205
367
3870
4205
367
4046
3558
496
7912
8667
059
551
6630
9028
068
6630
9028
068
7715
9558
254
7715
9558
254
8525
4464
108
8525
4464
108
8912
9562
686
1742
9791
3365
575
1436
6250
5416
1436
6250
5417
1671
7096
8143
1671
7096
8143
1847
0893
4751
1847
0893
4751
1931
0494
7248
3776
2730
3791
Page 64 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 37
The
tab
le s
how
s th
e de
com
posi
tion
of
the
Four
ier
coeffi
cien
ts m
ulti
plyi
ng q
−D/24 in
the
fun
ctio
n hg,3 2
(τ) i
nto
irre
duci
ble
repr
esen
tati
ons χn o
f M
23 -
part
I
−D
χ1
χ2
χ3
χ4
χ5
χ6
χ7
χ8
χ9
−9
10
00
00
00
0
150
00
00
10
00
390
10
01
00
00
630
00
02
12
22
871
22
210
1210
1012
111
08
1212
7271
6565
76
135
129
6666
317
324
327
327
354
159
814
827
827
814
5614
5114
3914
3915
84
183
2553
611
0811
0856
1456
6656
5056
5061
86
207
9019
6939
9639
9620
527
2057
120
585
2058
522
554
231
301
6612
1357
413
574
6920
069
575
6953
969
539
7616
0
255
979
2122
943
224
4322
422
1297
2221
2822
2072
2220
7224
3296
279
2892
6397
713
1140
1311
4066
9671
6728
2667
2862
6728
6273
6834
303
8477
1859
2537
9810
3798
1019
4229
319
5036
119
5025
319
5025
321
3617
8
327
2348
551
6995
1058
004
1058
004
5406
043
5430
193
5430
053
5430
053
5947
048
351
6322
913
9015
828
4255
028
4255
014
5311
0614
5932
2014
5933
1914
5933
1915
9834
98
375
1643
1436
1615
973
9813
073
9813
037
8087
3937
9748
2337
9745
6637
9745
6641
5907
10
399
4157
3391
4280
518
6982
6218
6982
6295
5754
8795
9885
0295
9881
4895
9881
4810
5130
940
423
1022
444
2249
8248
4602
3364
4602
3364
2352
2048
623
6247
135
2362
4736
423
6247
364
2587
4561
2
447
2456
955
5404
5257
1105
4036
411
0540
364
5649
9952
356
7449
989
5674
4937
556
7449
375
6214
9463
2
471
5768
329
1269
1180
725
9601
046
2596
0104
613
2682
7403
1332
6055
7513
3260
4789
1332
6047
8914
5951
6642
495
1326
9156
2919
0777
659
7070
540
5970
7054
030
5172
7864
3064
9823
5530
6498
2875
3064
9828
7533
5689
0620
519
2993
0003
6584
7866
813
4690
7692
1346
9076
9268
8414
4714
6914
0964
1469
1409
5094
6914
0950
9475
7257
3738
543
6631
2927
1458
8488
2029
8397
6756
2983
9767
5615
2515
1250
015
3177
9333
415
3177
9161
615
3177
9161
616
7766
4043
6
567
1444
4101
231
7775
1973
6499
9930
0464
9999
3004
3322
2076
673
3336
6564
639
3336
6565
723
3336
6565
723
3654
4317
696
Page 65 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 38
The
tab
le s
how
s th
e de
com
posi
tion
of
the
Four
ier
coeffi
cien
ts m
ulti
plyi
ng q
−D/24 in
the
fun
ctio
n hg,3 2
(τ) i
nto
irre
duci
ble
repr
esen
tati
ons χn o
f M
23 -
part
II
−D
χ10
χ11
χ12
χ13
χ14
χ15
χ16
χ17
−9
00
00
00
00
150
00
00
00
0
391
10
01
10
1
634
46
66
68
13
8741
4142
4249
4948
97
111
220
220
254
254
280
280
302
582
135
1099
1099
1278
1278
1418
1418
1462
2879
159
4783
4783
5568
5568
6143
6143
6460
1259
4
183
1892
018
920
2196
721
967
2430
824
308
2534
249
625
207
6848
268
482
7974
979
749
8805
588
055
9219
418
0159
231
2320
6423
2064
2699
1226
9912
2983
4729
8347
3116
6260
9707
255
7399
8473
9984
8611
6986
1169
9513
7495
1374
9950
3819
4543
8
279
2243
393
2243
393
2610
275
2610
275
2884
379
2884
379
3014
774
5896
262
303
6500
043
6500
043
7563
999
7563
999
8357
121
8357
121
8738
192
1708
6836
327
1810
2016
1810
2016
2106
3317
2106
3317
2327
3934
2327
3934
2432
9868
4758
0312
351
4864
1673
4864
1673
5660
2448
5660
2448
6253
9370
6253
9370
6538
5226
1278
6136
7
375
1265
8639
112
6586
391
1472
9844
314
7298
443
1627
5371
316
2753
713
1701
4660
833
2736
007
399
3199
5466
631
9954
666
3723
1329
437
2313
294
4113
7002
641
1370
026
4300
7652
484
1030
812
423
7875
0073
178
7500
731
9163
6044
891
6360
448
1012
5011
4810
1250
1148
1058
5117
6220
6999
0475
447
1891
4838
1718
9148
3817
2201
0053
0222
0100
5302
2431
9073
5624
3190
7356
2542
4671
4649
7191
7548
471
4442
0401
7344
4204
0173
5168
9085
8051
6890
8580
5711
1938
7557
1119
3875
5970
7655
6211
6761
9110
8
495
1021
6574
441
1021
6574
441
1188
8393
029
1188
8393
029
1313
5596
047
1313
5596
047
1373
2710
656
2685
5037
539
519
2304
7036
703
2304
7036
703
2681
8346
389
2681
8346
389
2963
1903
464
2963
1903
464
3097
8745
714
6058
0719
175
543
5105
9233
415
5105
9233
415
5941
4411
523
5941
4411
523
6564
7584
650
6564
7584
650
6863
1657
584
1342
1292
9307
567
1112
2199
3159
1112
2199
3159
1294
2190
9124
1294
2190
9124
1429
9970
6146
1429
9970
6146
1494
9955
8772
2923
5482
3899
Page 66 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 39
The
tabl
e sh
ows t
he d
ecom
posi
tion
of th
e Fo
urie
r coe
ffici
ents
mul
tiply
ing q−D/24 in
the
func
tion hg,1 2
(τ) i
nto
irred
ucib
le re
pres
enta
tions
χn o
f McL
- pa
rt I
−D
χ1
χ2
χ3
χ4
χ5
χ6
χ7
χ8
−1
−1
00
00
00
0
230
00
01
00
0
470
00
00
00
0
710
00
01
10
0
950
11
12
11
1
119
01
21
77
55
143
03
88
2322
2424
167
15
2729
9392
101
101
191
013
103
113
336
336
386
386
215
237
357
381
1192
1191
1370
1370
239
612
211
8112
9239
1139
0945
4145
41
263
1835
736
7339
9012
260
1225
914
231
1423
1
287
4910
6510
971
1198
736
504
3650
342
467
4246
7
311
135
2983
3129
634
082
1043
8110
4379
1213
7512
1375
335
379
8247
8612
794
007
2869
1928
6918
3338
6533
3865
359
995
2179
622
8754
2494
3276
2672
7626
7088
7304
8873
04
383
2564
5623
158
9479
6432
1819
6454
919
6454
522
8605
022
8605
0
407
6386
1405
6814
7613
816
1001
649
2087
049
2086
957
2573
157
2573
1
431
1562
234
3337
3603
184
3931
104
1200
9753
1200
9751
1397
5118
1397
5118
455
3716
781
7799
8587
440
9367
446
2862
5805
2862
5800
3330
9272
3330
9272
479
8675
619
0749
820
0245
8321
8458
8266
7466
5466
7466
5277
6692
7477
6692
74
503
1980
1443
5704
445
7511
9249
9088
3615
2506
325
1525
0632
117
7460
315
1774
6031
5
527
4441
7397
6982
810
2575
149
1119
0211
534
1912
961
3419
1295
839
7863
480
3978
6348
0
551
9779
9721
5176
6322
5940
987
2464
7785
475
3141
922
7531
4192
087
6380
147
8763
8014
7
575
2119
404
4662
2397
4895
1878
353
4024
793
1631
7204
5816
3172
0453
1898
7319
7218
9873
1972
Page 67 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 40
The
tab
le s
how
s th
e de
com
posi
tion
of
the
Four
ier
coeffi
cien
ts m
ulti
plyi
ng q
−D/24 in
the
fun
ctio
n hg,1 2
(τ) i
nto
irre
duci
ble
repr
esen
tati
ons χn o
f McL
- pa
rt II
−D
χ9
χ10
χ11
χ12
χ13
χ14
χ15
χ16
−1
00
00
00
00
230
00
00
00
0
470
10
00
00
0
710
11
10
11
2
953
53
54
55
8
119
821
2225
2727
3246
143
4999
9212
012
313
814
621
4
167
193
396
402
507
536
572
628
909
191
765
1535
1513
1946
2039
2212
2385
3459
215
2657
5375
5400
6874
7271
7783
8486
1226
9
239
8900
1788
117
816
2281
624
056
2588
728
072
4062
6
263
2774
555
882
5596
371
465
7550
081
007
8809
512
7410
287
8303
316
6945
1667
6621
3315
2251
5324
1943
2626
9438
0029
311
2369
1947
6743
4769
8260
9553
6438
0369
1150
7511
3210
8640
5
335
6523
1413
1187
813
1141
216
7684
517
7048
319
0166
620
6559
229
8787
9
359
1732
646
3485
567
3486
207
4456
239
4706
100
5053
141
5490
489
7941
451
383
4465
544
8981
556
8980
403
1148
1470
1212
3772
1302
0310
1414
4455
2045
9305
407
1118
2141
2249
3230
2249
4840
2875
6211
3036
7390
3260
8993
3542
8696
5124
4665
431
2729
6592
5490
3746
5490
1023
7018
7986
7411
6978
7959
3979
8646
9919
1250
7338
7
455
6505
5014
1308
5609
013
0859
914
1672
8929
717
6659
468
1897
0476
020
6102
830
2981
1203
9
479
1517
0109
030
5132
577
3051
2639
339
0081
042
4119
2213
244
2353
736
4805
7598
769
5120
690
503
3465
9729
569
7161
444
6971
7013
889
1261
397
9411
7661
110
1068
7552
1098
0395
9815
8823
3526
527
7770
8436
715
6304
2221
1563
0286
6419
9820
0428
2110
0921
6522
6596
3373
2461
7744
7435
6078
4919
551
1711
6694
1634
4291
2979
3442
9319
8844
0145
9954
4647
9516
8549
9124
9366
5422
6106
8078
4341
3933
575
3708
4763
9174
5931
9124
7459
2903
0995
3604
6829
1007
0049
592
1081
3885
859
1174
8391
635
1699
3217
734
Page 68 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 41
The
tab
le s
how
s th
e de
com
posi
tion
of
the
Four
ier
coeffi
cien
ts m
ulti
plyi
ng q
−D/24 in
the
fun
ctio
n hg,1 2
(τ) i
nto
irre
duci
ble
repr
esen
tati
ons χn o
f McL
- pa
rt II
I
−D
χ17
χ18
χ19
χ20
χ21
χ22
χ23
χ24
−1
00
00
00
00
230
00
00
00
0
470
00
00
00
1
712
11
11
11
2
958
88
1010
1011
11
119
4646
4653
5355
5960
143
214
221
221
261
261
263
279
279
167
909
928
928
1076
1076
1110
1175
1175
191
3459
3561
3561
4167
4167
4252
4487
4489
215
1226
912
607
1260
714
687
1468
715
064
1589
915
900
239
4062
641
815
4181
548
824
4882
449
950
5268
352
683
263
1274
1013
1025
1310
2515
2796
1527
9615
6541
1651
3016
5131
287
3800
2939
1030
3910
3045
6320
4563
2046
7137
4926
7749
2679
311
1086
405
1117
568
1117
568
1303
640
1303
640
1335
140
1408
229
1408
230
335
2987
879
3074
116
3074
116
3586
785
3586
785
3672
503
3873
309
3873
312
359
7941
451
8169
871
8169
871
9531
019
9531
019
9760
341
1029
4270
1029
4273
383
2045
9305
2104
9092
2104
9092
2455
8072
2455
8072
2514
6550
2652
1644
2652
1644
407
5124
4665
5272
0052
5272
0052
6150
5504
6150
5504
6298
3039
6642
7796
6642
7799
431
1250
7338
712
8677
387
1286
7738
715
0125
530
1501
2553
015
3726
332
1621
3294
516
2132
948
455
2981
1203
930
6697
753
3066
9775
335
7811
165
3578
1116
536
6401
965
3864
4037
538
6440
376
479
6951
2069
071
5147
222
7151
4722
283
4342
808
8343
4280
885
4361
992
9010
8413
790
1084
142
503
1588
2335
2616
3398
1014
1633
9810
1419
0630
4694
1906
3046
9419
5206
3468
2058
8186
8220
5881
8686
527
3560
7849
1936
6336
4558
3663
3645
5842
7393
4999
4273
9349
9943
7649
8280
4615
8362
1346
1583
6219
551
7843
4139
3380
6934
6991
8069
3469
9194
1422
4038
9414
2240
3896
4018
1689
1016
7382
764
1016
7382
771
575
1699
3217
734
1748
2746
319
1748
2746
319
2039
6558
046
2039
6558
046
2088
6051
640
2202
8253
515
2202
8253
520
Page 69 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 42
The
tabl
e sh
ows t
he d
ecom
posi
tion
of th
e Fo
urie
r coe
ffici
ents
mul
tiply
ing q−D/24 in
the
func
tion hg,3 2
(τ) i
nto
irred
ucib
le re
pres
enta
tions
χn o
f McL
- pa
rt I
−D
χ1
χ2
χ3
χ4
χ5
χ6
χ7
χ8
−9
10
00
00
00
150
01
00
00
0
390
00
10
00
0
630
01
00
00
0
871
01
11
10
0
111
00
41
33
22
135
10
65
1212
1414
159
13
2423
5555
6262
183
25
7272
219
219
247
247
207
222
245
259
777
777
905
905
231
673
804
865
2644
2644
3060
3060
255
1825
125
5627
8584
0484
0497
7597
75
279
3671
676
5983
0825
493
2549
329
645
2964
5
303
105
2128
2221
824
238
7382
273
822
8589
985
899
327
276
5867
6172
867
254
2056
5320
5653
2392
1923
9219
351
730
1580
316
5837
1809
3755
2420
5524
2064
2880
6428
80
375
1881
4105
143
1408
4704
0614
3789
514
3789
516
7298
716
7298
7
399
4756
1039
2710
9048
911
8974
836
3396
936
3396
942
2870
042
2870
0
423
1162
525
5433
2683
334
2926
781
8944
652
8944
652
1040
8024
1040
8024
447
2797
761
4030
6445
575
7031
919
2148
3285
2148
3285
2499
8994
2499
8994
471
6553
614
4129
715
1359
1616
5108
5050
4533
9350
4533
9358
7084
8458
7084
84
495
1508
1133
1576
334
8128
3037
9785
1511
6039
405
1160
3940
513
5028
617
1350
2861
7
519
3399
8174
7867
278
5306
0285
6675
9226
1770
033
2617
7003
330
4603
271
3046
0327
1
543
7534
2616
5704
3717
3981
507
1898
0026
957
9930
706
5799
3070
667
4830
133
6748
3013
3
567
1640
491
3609
1901
3789
7780
641
3425
592
1263
2644
3112
6326
4431
1469
9771
3814
6997
7138
Page 70 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 43
The
tab
le s
how
s th
e de
com
posi
tion
of
the
Four
ier
coeffi
cien
ts m
ulti
plyi
ng q
−D/24 in
the
fun
ctio
n hg,3 2
(τ) i
nto
irre
duci
ble
repr
esen
tati
ons χn o
f McL
- pa
rt II
−D
χ9
χ10
χ11
χ12
χ13
χ14
χ15
χ16
−9
00
00
00
00
150
00
00
00
0
390
00
00
01
0
630
00
10
11
0
871
12
22
26
4
111
713
1015
1419
2125
135
2454
5675
7881
9513
0
159
129
254
244
320
334
365
398
562
183
482
975
986
1251
1328
1414
1566
2235
207
1776
3566
3536
4559
4792
5173
5607
8093
231
5969
1202
612
064
1539
416
274
1744
519
023
2745
1
255
1915
438
471
3838
049
139
5184
655
752
6053
387
506
279
5780
911
6393
1165
1014
8894
1572
8216
8786
1835
4326
5369
303
1679
3133
7637
3373
9043
1517
4555
5848
9419
5315
7576
8802
327
4670
8393
9698
9400
3412
0148
612
6895
213
6237
114
8057
221
4123
9
351
1255
917
2525
910
2525
280
3228
953
3409
380
3661
782
3977
741
5753
503
375
3267
135
6572
140
6573
020
8402
301
8873
332
9527
924
1035
2451
1497
3440
399
8260
107
1661
3698
1661
2158
2123
8355
2242
6902
2408
4770
2616
5020
3784
5752
423
2032
6853
4088
7536
4088
9694
5227
2318
5520
0610
5927
5991
6440
1011
9315
0396
447
4882
8286
9821
2448
9820
8856
1255
5395
913
2583
074
1423
7930
515
4680
790
2237
3483
9
471
1146
6245
323
0638
380
2306
4343
829
4852
626
3113
6716
033
4361
281
3632
6241
252
5430
528
495
2637
3184
353
0473
486
5304
6543
267
8158
814
7161
3113
276
9034
337
8354
8696
512
0847
3427
519
5949
2242
611
9665
0730
1196
6620
6015
2981
4670
1615
4904
7217
3480
6216
1884
7400
6527
2613
6749
543
1318
0376
1526
5112
8016
2651
1105
3033
8921
7725
3579
0045
7638
4337
8364
4175
5068
5160
3957
4829
567
2871
0350
0157
7489
7738
5774
9222
2873
8269
4796
7796
1384
5883
7196
7563
9095
4962
6113
1559
7652
6
Page 71 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 44
The
tab
le s
how
s th
e de
com
posi
tion
of
the
Four
ier
coeffi
cien
ts m
ulti
plyi
ng q
−D/24 in
the
fun
ctio
n hg,3 2
(τ) i
nto
irre
duci
ble
repr
esen
tati
ons χn o
f McL
- pa
rt II
I
−D
χ17
χ18
χ19
χ20
χ21
χ22
χ23
χ24
−9
00
00
00
00
150
00
00
00
0
390
00
00
00
0
630
00
11
11
1
874
55
55
56
6
111
2527
2732
3231
3434
135
130
132
132
153
153
161
168
168
159
562
583
583
685
685
695
733
733
183
2235
2298
2298
2671
2671
2743
2898
2898
207
8093
8336
8336
9753
9753
9968
1050
310
503
231
2745
128
225
2822
532
895
3289
533
718
3557
635
576
255
8750
690
070
9007
010
5135
1051
3510
7589
1134
6711
3467
279
2653
6927
2959
2729
5931
8375
3183
7532
6136
3439
7634
3976
303
7688
0279
1067
7910
6792
3068
9230
6894
5024
9966
8599
6685
327
2141
239
2202
779
2202
779
2569
637
2569
637
2631
602
2775
597
2775
597
351
5753
503
5919
487
5919
487
6906
560
6906
560
7071
840
7458
445
7458
445
375
1497
3440
1540
4421
1540
4421
1797
1134
1797
1134
1840
3192
1940
9807
1940
9807
399
3784
5752
3893
6669
3893
6669
4542
7164
4542
7164
4651
6151
4905
9813
4905
9813
423
9315
0396
9583
2723
9583
2723
1118
0332
511
1803
325
1144
8856
512
0749
919
1207
4991
9
447
2237
3483
923
0181
494
2301
8149
426
8547
565
2685
4756
527
4989
746
2900
2776
929
0027
769
471
5254
3052
854
0564
243
5405
6424
363
0654
439
6306
5443
964
5794
430
6811
1229
968
1112
299
495
1208
4734
2712
4328
8847
1243
2888
4714
5050
9683
1450
5096
8314
8531
5445
1566
5421
1315
6654
2113
519
2726
1367
4928
0466
2530
2804
6625
3032
7209
7750
3272
0977
5033
5063
7733
3533
8778
2335
3387
7823
543
6039
5748
2962
1356
2155
6213
5621
5572
4916
8236
7249
1682
3674
2313
3737
7829
0838
0478
2908
3804
567
1315
5976
526
1353
4944
287
1353
4944
287
1579
0750
779
1579
0750
779
1616
9749
982
1705
4036
789
1705
4036
789
Page 72 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 45
The
tabl
e sh
ows
the
deco
mpo
siti
on o
f the
Fou
rier
coe
ffici
ents
mul
tipl
ying
q−D/24 in
the
func
tion
hg,1 2
(τ) i
nto
irre
duci
ble
repr
esen
tati
ons χ
n o
f HS
- par
t I −
Dχ1
χ2
χ3
χ4
χ5
χ6
χ7
χ8
−1
−1
00
00
00
0
230
00
00
00
0
470
00
00
00
0
710
00
10
01
0
950
23
25
53
6
119
02
819
1414
2124
143
016
4480
9090
9213
1
167
450
174
357
339
339
407
515
191
720
368
113
3413
7213
7215
2120
39
215
3367
223
7247
8747
2047
2054
3571
12
239
9922
9279
2915
766
1588
715
887
1792
923
777
263
330
7047
2473
349
595
4939
249
392
5634
874
177
287
948
2120
773
979
1476
9514
8048
1480
4816
7874
2219
11
311
2759
6024
521
1115
4226
2842
2054
4220
5448
0211
6333
38
335
7516
1662
3358
1198
1161
707
1162
651
1162
651
1320
213
1743
556
359
2010
844
0909
1543
852
3088
701
3087
208
3087
208
3509
785
4631
476
383
5159
111
3721
339
7875
379
5577
979
5817
179
5817
190
4089
211
9361
73
407
1295
1828
4617
399
6342
019
9293
8419
9256
8919
9256
8922
6467
2429
8902
00
431
3156
5969
4987
124
3211
2548
6381
8948
6439
1248
6439
1255
2711
9272
9632
81
455
7530
8816
5600
0657
9643
3211
5934
578
1159
2592
611
5925
926
1317
4316
617
3892
768
479
1754
960
3862
0903
1351
6536
327
0321
371
2703
3450
927
0334
509
3071
8459
040
5495
839
503
4011
289
8823
1069
3088
1883
161
7651
188
6176
3166
461
7631
664
7018
7471
992
6456
288
527
8990
981
1978
2806
969
2381
433
1384
7423
5113
8477
1352
1384
7713
5215
7357
3454
2077
1439
71
551
1980
7924
4357
3618
715
2509
8819
3050
2270
0630
5018
4616
3050
1846
1634
6616
3569
4575
2959
28
575
4291
0275
9440
8184
633
0425
0864
6608
4579
1666
0851
9893
6608
5198
9375
0961
6830
9912
7519
19
Page 73 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 46
The
tabl
e sh
ows
the
deco
mpo
siti
on o
f the
Fou
rier
coe
ffici
ents
mul
tipl
ying
q−D/24 in
the
func
tion
hg,1 2
(τ) i
nto
irre
duci
ble
repr
esen
tati
ons χ
n o
f HS
- par
t II −
Dχ9
χ10
χ11
χ12
χ13
χ14
χ15
χ16
−1
00
00
00
00
230
01
00
00
0
470
10
01
00
0
713
23
43
33
2
9514
1915
1518
1717
22
119
7985
9494
9510
610
611
7
143
375
432
413
412
449
478
478
575
167
1585
1739
1776
1777
1887
2061
2061
2396
191
6059
6780
6708
6709
7219
7803
7803
9247
215
2145
423
769
2389
823
897
2554
427
789
2778
932
642
239
7111
879
177
7895
078
950
8468
691
864
9186
410
8441
263
2229
1424
7447
2478
3624
7836
2653
6528
8353
2883
5333
9513
287
6651
2073
9461
7387
9673
8797
7918
5785
9693
8596
9310
1372
5
311
1901
066
2111
639
2112
736
2112
736
2263
145
2458
353
2458
353
2896
427
335
5228
981
5811
159
5809
370
5809
369
6225
096
6760
018
6760
018
7968
570
359
1389
7177
1543
9550
1544
2403
1544
2404
1654
4170
1796
9139
1796
9139
2117
5541
383
3580
4287
3978
5466
3978
0944
3978
0943
4262
4415
4629
0660
4629
0660
5456
0442
407
8967
7291
9963
7115
9964
4150
9964
4149
1067
5844
911
5949
075
1159
4907
513
6648
460
431
2188
7965
624
3206
606
2431
9575
624
3195
757
2605
7161
328
2991
729
2829
9172
933
3534
637
455
5216
9404
057
9649
779
5796
6627
057
9666
271
6210
6371
967
4519
766
6745
1976
679
4956
158
479
1216
4640
5513
5164
2677
1351
6177
6713
5161
7768
1448
1727
9515
7279
2424
1572
7924
2418
5366
8197
503
2779
4041
5030
8820
3718
3088
2408
6530
8824
0863
3308
8130
3535
9358
7213
3593
5872
1342
3526
8766
527
6231
3799
6269
2379
0672
6923
7356
4869
2373
5648
7418
3122
7280
5671
2554
8056
7125
5494
9545
5515
551
1372
5964
622
1525
1021
256
1525
1101
926
1525
1101
928
1634
0430
775
1774
6732
420
1774
6732
420
2091
5725
781
575
2973
8144
692
3304
2457
875
3304
2340
266
3304
2340
266
3540
2559
005
3844
9273
233
3844
9273
233
4531
5309
735
Page 74 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 47
The
tabl
e sh
ows
the
deco
mpo
siti
on o
f the
Fou
rier
coe
ffici
ents
mul
tipl
ying
q−D/24 in
the
func
tion
hg,1 2
(τ) i
nto
irre
duci
ble
repr
esen
tati
ons χ
n o
f HS
- par
t III −
Dχ17
χ18
χ19
χ20
χ21
χ22
χ23
χ24
−1
00
00
00
00
230
00
00
00
0
470
00
11
11
1
714
56
46
79
9
9526
2735
4240
5356
67
119
162
164
202
215
221
286
317
361
143
740
756
941
1054
1046
1371
1487
1743
167
3180
3230
4009
4374
4396
5744
6289
7290
191
1207
312
281
1527
316
866
1683
422
047
2402
828
003
215
4296
743
635
5421
359
519
5959
177
977
8515
999
000
239
1421
2214
4411
1795
2419
7695
1975
8325
8692
2821
9532
8520
263
4459
8545
3032
5630
1161
8937
6191
5981
0439
8846
1010
2907
9
287
1329
897
1351
104
1679
391
1847
957
1847
627
2418
829
2639
284
3071
601
311
3802
615
3862
871
4800
963
5280
034
5280
632
6912
578
7544
029
8777
736
335
1045
7085
1062
3310
1320
3972
1452
6071
1452
5165
1901
5093
2074
9740
2414
6350
359
2779
5624
2823
6528
3509
4660
3860
1412
3860
2966
5053
4149
5514
7824
6416
9990
383
7160
6337
7274
3550
9041
3520
9945
9154
9945
6838
1301
9891
014
2079
975
1653
3246
9
407
1793
5782
418
2203
997
2264
5977
524
9099
125
2491
0290
332
6096
807
3558
6308
241
4090
303
431
4377
5401
344
4703
911
5527
2319
860
8005
819
6080
0021
579
5929
685
8685
6881
310
1070
5622
455
1043
3956
6110
5995
5647
1317
4138
1214
4913
9547
1449
1483
8518
9706
3405
2070
2162
4824
0896
7373
479
2432
9160
4524
7153
6933
3071
8716
4233
7908
2403
3379
0694
9144
2351
4093
4827
2354
6756
1716
3685
503
5558
8256
1556
4705
6684
7018
7078
6377
2054
3541
7720
5633
1910
1069
1132
711
0293
8577
712
8341
6854
4
527
1246
2733
462
1266
0561
531
1573
5791
983
1730
9423
366
1730
9394
714
2265
9582
306
2472
7692
056
2877
4079
262
551
2745
1966
739
2788
7702
980
3466
1549
588
3812
7628
080
3812
7670
972
4991
2570
342
5446
8122
422
6338
1031
865
575
5947
6232
959
6042
0314
767
7509
6290
859
8260
6031
374
8260
5970
008
1081
3874
8123
1180
0849
7342
1373
1905
9194
Page 75 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 48
The
tabl
e sh
ows
the
deco
mpo
siti
on o
f the
Fou
rier
coe
ffici
ents
mul
tipl
ying
q−D/24 in
the
func
tion
hg,3 2
(τ) i
nto
irre
duci
ble
repr
esen
tati
ons χ
n o
f HS
- par
t I −
Dχ1
χ2
χ3
χ4
χ5
χ6
χ7
χ8
−9
10
00
00
00
150
00
00
00
1
390
01
00
01
0
630
00
01
10
1
871
02
31
13
3
111
02
610
1313
1221
135
14
2554
4545
6173
159
236
118
217
232
232
251
349
183
811
743
688
285
085
010
0012
98
207
1945
515
8531
3831
9131
9135
6747
68
231
7615
0453
3310
710
1060
910
609
1216
915
972
255
224
4906
1707
834
000
3416
834
168
3866
251
207
279
680
1465
351
536
1032
8710
2985
1029
8511
7337
1546
28
303
1937
4282
414
9641
2988
8329
9362
2993
6233
9698
4488
87
327
5448
1187
9041
6242
8329
4083
2131
8321
3194
6482
1248
628
351
1449
231
9869
1119
026
2237
183
2238
459
2238
459
2542
349
3357
136
375
3790
083
1414
2911
159
5823
587
5821
517
5821
517
6617
566
8733
350
399
9550
621
0326
773
5976
514
7170
8214
7202
5014
7202
5016
7242
8522
0791
47
423
2354
0051
7380
418
1114
8836
2264
6736
2214
8636
2214
8641
1659
9354
3345
28
447
5648
2312
4314
2443
5059
6587
0062
5587
0137
6887
0137
6898
8715
0213
0517
592
471
1327
268
2918
8063
1021
6480
520
4337
166
2043
2565
520
4325
655
2322
0043
130
6494
073
495
3051
197
6714
0916
2349
8481
946
9957
788
4699
7482
946
9974
829
5340
4432
770
4954
744
519
6885
123
1514
4650
253
0077
046
1060
1709
8110
6014
5461
1060
1454
6112
0473
7801
1590
2303
48
543
1525
0485
3355
4031
611
7437
0946
2348
7146
2223
4875
1902
2348
7519
0226
6899
7408
3523
1119
75
567
3322
3874
7308
7482
425
5809
4287
5116
2271
4551
1617
2310
5116
1723
1058
1388
9540
7674
2835
01
Page 76 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 49
The
tabl
e sh
ows
the
deco
mpo
siti
on o
f the
Fou
rier
coe
ffici
ents
mul
tipl
ying
q−D/24 in
the
func
tion
hg,3 2
(τ) i
nto
irre
duci
ble
repr
esen
tati
ons χ
n o
f HS
- par
t II −
Dχ9
χ10
χ11
χ12
χ13
χ14
χ15
χ16
−9
00
00
00
00
150
00
00
00
0
390
00
00
00
0
631
10
01
11
3
877
710
109
1010
10
111
4654
4848
5654
5471
135
227
239
254
254
268
299
299
344
159
990
1118
1089
1089
1183
1265
1265
1520
183
3908
4310
4367
4367
4655
5071
5071
5937
207
1418
115
813
1570
915
709
1687
918
296
1829
621
661
231
4802
553
238
5342
653
426
5717
162
148
6214
873
107
255
1531
8517
0410
1700
8617
0086
1823
9119
7917
1979
1723
3542
279
4643
4651
5565
5161
2651
6126
5527
5560
0589
6005
8970
7419
303
1345
538
1495
628
1494
707
1494
707
1601
901
1739
300
1739
300
2050
680
327
3747
019
4162
388
4163
910
4163
910
4460
701
4845
163
4845
163
5709
189
351
1006
8963
1118
9191
1118
6751
1118
6751
1198
6913
1301
7514
1301
7514
1534
4148
375
2620
3117
2911
2145
2911
6039
2911
6039
3119
4087
3388
0203
3388
0203
3992
7180
399
6623
0865
7359
3695
7358
7635
7358
7635
7884
6635
8562
9401
8562
9401
1009
2542
8
423
1630
1217
618
1118
490
1811
2790
318
1127
903
1940
6156
621
0766
813
2107
6681
324
8396
323
447
3915
3780
343
5051
059
4350
3672
143
5036
721
4661
1722
750
6225
002
5062
2500
259
6634
205
471
9195
0102
610
2165
4112
1021
6758
7510
2167
5875
1094
6433
0111
8885
7894
1188
8578
9414
0113
6588
495
2114
8325
8323
4983
4128
2349
8016
3023
4980
1630
2517
6590
6127
3431
6595
2734
3165
9532
2261
4325
519
4770
7338
7453
0078
4874
5300
8332
1953
0083
3219
5679
4432
2561
6823
9640
6168
2396
4072
6967
2253
543
1056
9264
743
1174
3672
359
1174
3601
341
1174
3601
341
1258
2461
650
1366
5284
242
1366
5284
242
1610
5571
907
567
2302
2947
110
2558
0985
954
2558
1089
850
2558
1089
850
2740
8265
179
2976
7082
573
2976
7082
573
3508
2549
764
Page 77 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 50
The
tabl
e sh
ows
the
deco
mpo
siti
on o
f the
Fou
rier
coe
ffici
ents
mul
tipl
ying
q−D/24 in
the
func
tion
hg,3 2
(τ) i
nto
irre
duci
ble
repr
esen
tati
ons χ
n o
f HS
- par
t III −
Dχ17
χ18
χ19
χ20
χ21
χ22
χ23
χ24
−9
00
00
00
00
150
00
00
00
0
391
10
00
01
0
632
22
42
44
5
8719
1919
2020
2832
34
111
8993
111
131
125
168
181
213
135
466
468
580
622
628
822
904
1043
159
1973
2007
2489
2770
2750
3612
3932
4587
183
7859
7976
9884
1082
810
850
1420
415
532
1802
3
207
2832
828
783
3578
439
464
3939
851
610
5626
765
550
231
9615
297
662
1213
1313
3278
1333
6217
4568
1906
0822
1641
255
3062
4831
1150
3867
2642
5729
4255
3555
7162
6078
7270
7534
279
9290
2094
3669
1172
777
1289
537
1289
797
1688
384
1842
742
2143
915
303
2690
703
2733
527
3397
533
3738
214
3737
680
4893
216
5339
398
6213
691
327
7494
835
7613
625
9462
567
1040
7432
1040
8176
1362
5020
1486
9371
1730
1389
351
2013
6861
2045
6746
2542
5987
2797
0908
2796
9538
3661
5272
3995
5933
4649
5887
375
5240
8277
5323
9679
6617
0567
7278
4072
7278
6002
9528
2852
1039
8127
612
0993
550
399
1324
5908
413
4562
341
1672
4784
518
3978
541
1839
7519
524
0841
718
2628
2044
330
5831
383
423
3260
2906
233
1202
866
4116
4968
345
2805
738
4528
1050
259
2768
390
6468
7482
975
2720
667
447
7830
6915
779
5500
581
9887
2755
210
8761
4155
1087
6063
4514
2377
8908
1553
7201
6818
0797
4775
471
1839
0128
6718
6820
0964
2321
9783
4725
5415
5967
2554
1670
5933
4363
2878
3648
8165
7442
4588
0168
495
4229
6504
3442
9679
1328
5340
4771
9558
7455
5816
5874
5382
4876
9031
1850
8392
1893
9297
6547
9321
519
9541
4914
0996
9293
7895
1204
7321
308
1325
2008
175
1325
2033
063
1734
8106
814
1893
1489
848
2202
9335
806
543
2113
8496
831
2147
4037
147
2669
0041
661
2935
9113
857
2935
9075
739
3843
3714
858
4194
1519
745
4880
4725
354
567
4604
5944
874
4677
6819
698
5813
8785
609
6395
2566
006
6395
2619
706
8371
9772
698
9136
0913
541
1063
1081
0073
Page 78 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 51
The
tab
le s
how
s th
e de
com
posi
tion
of t
he F
ouri
er c
oeffi
cien
ts m
ulti
plyi
ng q
−D/24 in
the
func
tion
hg,1 2
(τ) i
nto
irre
duci
ble
repr
esen
tati
ons χn o
f U6(2) -
pa
rt I
−D
χ1
χ2
χ3
χ4
χ5
χ6
χ7
χ8
χ9
χ10
−1
−1
00
00
00
00
0
230
00
00
00
00
1
470
00
00
00
00
0
710
00
00
00
01
1
950
11
00
00
11
2
119
01
21
02
20
45
143
03
52
13
33
79
167
14
108
311
1310
2227
191
08
2817
1833
3232
5661
215
215
6757
5499
112
103
172
180
239
336
187
156
196
280
312
330
475
487
263
973
477
461
592
807
971
998
1394
1411
287
1217
913
1812
7918
0322
6527
2329
3638
9239
14
311
3340
434
5135
5650
8062
4477
4182
8710
843
1087
8
335
6610
2991
8895
3414
074
1675
120
811
2268
029
067
2910
9
359
160
2473
2355
825
066
3721
443
863
5515
660
008
7644
376
503
383
334
6120
5983
763
872
9610
911
1842
1408
4415
4261
1949
5319
5033
407
795
1467
814
7655
1592
2324
0240
2783
6235
2289
3856
5348
6133
4862
40
431
1763
3522
035
8129
3868
5458
6899
6763
7485
6699
9404
0811
8147
211
8161
0
455
4088
8241
484
8112
9201
6213
9773
816
0761
120
4054
322
3970
728
1045
628
1064
5
479
9121
1906
7919
7191
621
4126
632
6034
337
4105
947
5052
752
2023
765
4105
465
4129
2
503
2050
043
1992
4492
407
4887
625
7446
731
8536
684
1085
0420
1192
3091
1493
1553
1493
1866
527
4500
996
4995
1005
8179
1094
7884
1669
7919
1912
1267
2430
9087
2672
6129
3344
7564
3344
7965
551
9835
421
1732
822
1252
2024
1038
0436
7751
7842
0929
4653
5366
7958
8603
8173
6432
8073
6437
97
575
2109
6845
7916
747
9036
3252
1994
1379
6807
0391
1559
8611
5951
616
1275
1242
315
9487
514
1594
8816
7
Page 79 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 52
The
tab
le s
how
s th
e de
com
posi
tion
of t
he F
ouri
er c
oeffi
cien
ts m
ulti
plyi
ng q
−D/24 in
the
func
tion
hg,1 2
(τ) i
nto
irre
duci
ble
repr
esen
tati
ons χn o
f U6(2) -
pa
rt II
−D
χ11
χ12
χ13
χ14
χ15
χ16
χ17
χ18
χ19
−1
00
00
00
00
0
230
00
00
00
00
470
00
00
00
10
710
00
00
01
10
950
00
10
12
31
119
00
00
03
58
3
143
11
15
414
1622
17
167
1010
1012
1145
4963
55
191
3939
3962
6115
916
420
421
9
215
157
157
157
189
207
510
519
625
715
239
532
532
532
693
744
1642
1653
1946
2383
263
1732
1732
1732
2090
2302
4975
4992
5815
7273
287
5207
5207
5207
6424
7052
1467
114
694
1698
321
717
311
1507
115
071
1507
118
136
2009
741
417
4145
047
724
6150
6
335
4158
541
585
4158
550
419
5577
311
3397
1134
4013
0238
1691
59
359
1110
4811
1048
1110
4813
3476
1481
0229
9955
3000
1634
3936
4480
42
383
2864
7928
6479
2864
7934
5208
3828
6477
1309
7713
8888
3312
1154
153
407
7188
8471
8884
7188
8486
3390
9587
4219
2813
019
2823
822
0670
428
8684
6
431
1755
665
1755
665
1755
665
2110
561
2343
230
4702
139
4702
278
5378
796
7045
333
455
4187
951
4187
951
4187
951
5027
797
5584
747
1119
8147
1119
8333
1280
6125
1678
2848
479
9767
990
9767
990
9767
990
1173
1080
1302
9827
2610
1380
2610
1618
2984
2923
3913
1147
503
2232
6103
2232
6103
2232
6103
2679
7674
2977
0742
5961
4785
5961
5100
6815
2090
8938
5449
527
5006
1479
5006
1479
5006
1479
6009
6749
6676
2700
1336
3122
313
3631
622
1527
5329
620
0393
822
551
1102
8960
511
0289
605
1102
8960
513
2364
423
1470
6013
729
4300
418
2943
0093
633
6394
392
4413
6042
7
575
2389
6510
923
8965
109
2389
6510
928
6811
937
3186
5280
063
7563
387
6375
6404
172
8720
690
9562
1602
2
Page 80 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 53
The
tab
le s
how
s th
e de
com
posi
tion
of t
he F
ouri
er c
oeffi
cien
ts m
ulti
plyi
ng q
−D/24 in
the
func
tion
hg,1 2
(τ) i
nto
irre
duci
ble
repr
esen
tati
ons χn o
f U6(2) -
pa
rt II
I
−D
χ20
χ21
χ22
χ23
χ24
χ25
χ26
χ27
χ28
−1
00
00
00
00
0
230
00
00
00
00
470
00
00
00
00
711
10
10
00
00
950
21
21
11
11
119
48
57
54
44
4
143
1224
2224
2022
2424
24
167
5989
8185
8386
9797
97
191
204
281
291
296
302
345
388
388
388
215
750
942
982
991
1064
1194
1360
1360
1360
239
2420
2932
3180
3191
3473
4006
4564
4564
4564
263
7688
9022
9799
9816
1085
612
481
1426
614
266
1426
6
287
2275
426
332
2898
329
006
3223
237
369
4272
842
728
4272
8
311
6531
374
730
8232
382
356
9203
410
6605
1220
2712
2027
1220
27
335
1791
6220
3895
2256
7122
5714
2526
8329
3554
3360
8033
6080
3360
80
359
4768
7754
0363
5983
0759
8368
6712
6877
9662
8929
7689
2976
8929
76
383
1227
450
1387
781
1539
339
1539
418
1728
219
2009
529
2301
754
2301
754
2301
754
407
3076
064
3471
701
3851
620
3851
728
4327
763
5031
900
5764
588
5764
588
5764
588
431
7505
177
8462
435
9395
281
9395
420
1055
9896
1228
3559
1407
2625
1407
2625
1407
2625
455
1789
2382
2015
9114
2238
3595
2238
3781
2516
7016
2927
4597
3354
0710
3354
0710
3354
0710
479
4171
4567
4697
9165
5217
9270
5217
9508
5867
5953
6826
5693
7821
5160
7821
5160
7821
5160
503
9531
9311
1073
1205
911
9196
613
1191
9692
813
4058
491
1559
6844
917
8705
755
1787
0575
517
8705
755
527
2136
9102
224
0528
777
2672
0376
926
7204
168
3005
3968
934
9688
430
4006
6980
840
0669
808
4006
6980
8
551
4707
2001
952
9752
466
5885
1885
258
8519
370
6619
9003
977
0250
507
8825
5852
888
2558
528
8825
5852
8
575
1019
8155
8311
4759
8073
1274
9856
2912
7498
6283
1434
2030
4416
6881
5367
1912
1486
0119
1214
8601
1912
1486
01
Page 81 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 54
The
tab
le s
how
s th
e de
com
posi
tion
of t
he F
ouri
er c
oeffi
cien
ts m
ulti
plyi
ng q
−D/24 in
the
func
tion
hg,1 2
(τ) i
nto
irre
duci
ble
repr
esen
tati
ons χn o
f U6(2) -
pa
rt IV
−D
χ29
χ30
χ31
χ32
χ33
χ34
χ35
χ36
χ37
−1
00
00
00
00
0
230
00
00
00
00
471
00
00
00
00
711
00
00
01
00
954
31
11
13
01
119
119
44
46
124
11
143
4339
2626
2630
4730
44
167
140
135
105
105
105
124
181
141
208
191
504
495
430
430
430
476
641
581
769
215
1659
1647
1512
1512
1512
1679
2189
2112
2800
239
5391
5373
5106
5106
5106
5576
7089
7143
9196
263
1651
316
488
1598
115
981
1598
117
469
2195
622
579
2903
4
287
4894
448
909
4796
447
964
4796
452
139
6497
067
811
8640
1
311
1388
1213
8765
1370
5213
7052
1370
5214
9008
1848
7619
4405
2475
40
335
3808
4638
0778
3777
4537
7745
3777
4540
9888
5069
6453
5979
6802
73
359
1009
253
1009
164
1003
898
1003
898
1003
898
1089
307
1345
063
1426
142
1809
476
383
2597
544
2597
424
2588
431
2588
431
2588
431
2806
561
3461
147
3677
682
4660
418
407
6498
438
6498
279
6483
169
6483
169
6483
169
7029
317
8662
775
9215
765
1167
6421
431
1585
3998
1585
3785
1582
8769
1582
8769
1582
8769
1715
7026
2113
2786
2250
2085
2849
5813
455
3776
9072
3776
8797
3772
7937
3772
7937
3772
7937
4089
2977
5035
3789
5364
4469
6792
7686
479
8805
0558
8805
0195
8798
4244
8798
4244
8798
4244
9535
3051
1173
8601
712
5107
300
1583
8347
7
503
2011
3595
220
1135
486
2010
3024
220
1030
242
2010
3024
221
7864
013
2681
6799
128
5875
651
3618
9762
9
527
4509
0047
845
0899
874
4507
3371
045
0733
710
4507
3371
048
8448
796
6011
6491
264
0979
164
8113
5301
3
551
9931
0512
999
3104
358
9928
4459
599
2844
595
9928
4459
510
7591
2674
1324
1065
4314
1196
0695
1787
2234
81
575
2151
5222
6521
5152
1277
2151
1188
7421
5111
8874
2151
1188
7423
3103
3239
2868
6125
6030
5921
4800
3872
0973
31
Page 82 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 55
The
tab
le s
how
s th
e de
com
posi
tion
of t
he F
ouri
er c
oeffi
cien
ts m
ulti
plyi
ng q
−D/24 in
the
func
tion
hg,1 2
(τ) i
nto
irre
duci
ble
repr
esen
tati
ons χn o
f U6(2) -
pa
rt V
−D
χ38
χ39
χ40
χ41
χ42
χ43
χ44
χ45
χ46
−1
00
00
00
00
0
230
00
00
00
00
470
00
00
00
00
710
00
01
11
00
952
22
33
33
32
119
911
1112
1717
1821
17
143
4955
5567
6969
8794
91
167
199
228
228
265
295
295
362
409
415
191
786
881
881
1049
1088
1088
1384
1557
1631
215
2771
3105
3105
3657
3864
3864
4892
5575
5869
239
9251
1031
110
311
1223
012
681
1268
116
220
1845
219
609
263
2894
332
259
3225
938
155
3977
339
773
5083
157
985
6176
0
287
8656
096
303
9630
311
4151
1182
9611
8296
1516
7517
2971
1847
63
311
2472
8627
5091
2750
9132
5787
3381
6233
8162
4335
0349
4841
5289
70
335
6807
0275
6753
7567
5389
6888
9291
0992
9109
1192
384
1360
994
1456
375
359
1808
802
2010
778
2010
778
2382
438
2469
363
2469
363
3168
960
3618
306
3873
101
383
4661
495
5180
729
5180
729
6140
008
6359
343
6359
343
8164
490
9321
948
9982
360
407
1167
4769
1297
4774
1297
4774
1537
5595
1592
7891
1592
7891
2044
9076
2335
1239
2500
8800
431
2849
8396
3166
8560
3166
8560
3753
2560
3886
9434
3886
9434
4991
1204
5699
4271
6105
0043
455
6792
3794
7547
8392
7547
8392
8945
0970
9264
3752
9264
3752
1189
6173
213
5851
564
1455
2748
6
479
1583
8939
617
5998
083
1759
9808
320
8588
414
2160
0731
421
6007
314
2773
9033
931
6772
980
3393
5918
6
503
3618
8887
140
2117
862
4021
1786
247
6572
073
4935
3604
749
3536
047
6337
8694
872
3786
642
7754
1467
1
527
8113
6608
890
1543
092
9015
4309
210
6848
9749
1106
4646
6911
0646
4669
1420
9411
3716
2271
9280
1738
5253
74
551
1787
2044
1119
8582
9461
1985
8294
6123
5354
7126
2437
2209
3424
3722
0934
3129
9293
1235
7442
8126
3829
5703
52
575
3872
1252
4043
0242
3193
4302
4231
9350
9915
2355
5280
3105
0452
8031
0504
6781
1858
1077
4422
2864
8297
1325
08
Page 83 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 56
The
tab
le s
how
s th
e de
com
posi
tion
of t
he F
ouri
er c
oeffi
cien
ts m
ulti
plyi
ng q
−D/24 in
the
func
tion
hg,3 2
(τ) i
nto
irre
duci
ble
repr
esen
tati
ons χn o
f U6(2) -
pa
rt I
−D
χ1
χ2
χ3
χ4
χ5
χ6
χ7
χ8
χ9
χ10
−9
10
00
00
00
00
150
01
00
00
00
0
390
00
10
00
00
0
630
01
00
10
00
0
871
01
10
10
01
1
111
00
41
02
00
22
135
10
54
15
20
55
159
12
148
413
67
1414
183
22
2419
1030
2420
4343
207
28
6240
4279
6666
113
113
231
516
140
124
128
213
228
223
342
342
255
1054
379
334
423
585
648
693
964
964
279
1710
794
692
812
4216
3919
5220
3727
8227
82
303
3029
925
7425
5636
4245
0254
3458
8976
9776
97
327
6471
666
5569
4710
035
1214
915
072
1626
721
026
2102
6
351
122
1817
1736
618
206
2708
731
983
3984
843
501
5545
055
450
375
287
4447
4396
547
011
7019
982
214
1035
1411
2936
1432
2014
3220
399
608
1097
310
9822
1177
8117
7721
2060
6325
9946
2849
9735
9275
3592
75
423
1400
2617
626
7074
2886
8343
6768
5045
9163
9120
7004
2788
1263
8812
63
447
3111
6220
863
8341
6910
0110
4970
412
0768
715
3097
616
8136
221
0998
721
0998
7
471
7070
1441
0014
9147
416
1995
924
6362
028
2983
635
9351
839
4621
049
4767
549
4767
5
495
1566
632
9562
3422
339
3719
775
5667
740
6498
220
8255
052
9073
094
1136
3145
1136
3145
519
3486
473
8943
7702
776
8384
938
1278
2104
1464
3912
1861
7246
2046
2399
2561
5443
2561
5443
543
7589
916
3259
617
0462
8618
5625
8628
3209
8732
4185
8841
2226
4445
3261
7556
7116
0156
7116
01
567
1641
1835
4553
837
0915
1440
4189
9661
6840
6370
5825
7889
7823
6898
7204
8212
3491
729
1234
9172
9
Page 84 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 57
The
tab
le s
how
s th
e de
com
posi
tion
of t
he F
ouri
er c
oeffi
cien
ts m
ulti
plyi
ng q
−D/24 in
the
func
tion
hg,3 2
(τ) i
nto
irre
duci
ble
repr
esen
tati
ons χn o
f U6(2) -
pa
rt II
−D
χ11
χ12
χ13
χ14
χ15
χ16
χ17
χ18
χ19
−9
00
00
00
00
0
150
00
00
00
00
390
00
00
00
00
630
00
00
00
00
870
00
00
00
01
111
00
00
02
24
4
135
11
10
08
810
9
159
55
511
930
3040
44
183
2626
2630
3210
010
012
713
9
207
9797
9713
614
335
035
041
649
7
231
363
363
363
436
475
1106
1106
1310
1596
255
1172
1172
1172
1484
1607
3458
3458
4034
5088
279
3638
3638
3638
4370
4842
1024
810
248
1185
615
102
303
1061
110
611
1061
112
975
1429
729
442
2944
233
922
4378
3
327
2981
429
814
2981
435
856
3974
181
284
8128
493
406
1210
84
351
8028
680
286
8028
697
039
1074
9321
7714
2177
1424
9613
3252
36
375
2096
7520
9675
2096
7525
1918
2796
2656
4586
5645
8664
6742
8443
20
399
5305
0653
0506
5305
0663
8563
7085
4714
2502
014
2502
016
3101
721
3371
3
423
1307
537
1307
537
1307
537
1570
043
1743
695
3502
378
3502
378
4006
776
5246
147
447
3142
048
3142
048
3142
048
3775
558
4192
520
8406
902
8406
902
9614
460
1259
9677
471
7383
374
7383
374
7383
374
8863
180
9845
654
1973
0666
1973
0666
2256
0343
2957
6649
495
1698
5215
1698
5215
1698
5215
2039
4871
2265
4755
4536
6836
4536
6836
5186
4617
6802
1751
519
3832
6695
3832
6695
3832
6695
4600
0805
5110
5811
1023
1100
810
2311
008
1169
5463
615
3417
371
543
8491
9350
8491
9350
8491
9350
1019
3370
111
3244
297
2266
3161
622
6631
616
2590
4986
233
9876
627
567
1850
0300
618
5003
006
1850
0300
622
2026
326
2466
8079
349
3602
894
4936
0289
456
4184
563
7402
8402
9
Page 85 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 58
The
tab
le s
how
s th
e de
com
posi
tion
of t
he F
ouri
er c
oeffi
cien
ts m
ulti
plyi
ng q
−D/24 in
the
func
tion
hg,3 2
(τ) i
nto
irre
duci
ble
repr
esen
tati
ons χn o
f U6(2) -
pa
rt II
I
−D
χ20
χ21
χ22
χ23
χ24
χ25
χ26
χ27
χ28
−9
00
00
00
00
0
150
00
00
00
00
390
10
00
00
00
630
10
00
00
00
871
31
10
10
00
111
27
44
24
33
3
135
920
1515
1211
1313
13
159
3260
5555
4859
6363
63
183
142
204
193
193
196
219
243
243
243
207
477
630
662
662
698
801
909
909
909
231
1672
2051
2165
2165
2352
2689
3057
3057
3057
255
5228
6225
6779
6779
7442
8627
9834
9834
9834
279
1597
718
566
2028
620
286
2254
826
013
2975
929
759
2975
9
303
4606
852
957
5840
058
400
6510
075
588
8645
486
454
8645
4
327
1286
6414
6652
1618
6916
1869
1811
8421
0189
2406
2724
0627
2406
27
351
3450
7439
1657
4338
5143
3851
4863
0856
5195
6472
2164
7221
6472
21
375
8990
0310
1703
011
2698
611
2698
612
6512
414
7020
616
8399
316
8399
316
8399
3
399
2270
753
2564
491
2845
570
2845
570
3196
124
3717
138
4257
972
4257
972
4257
972
423
5591
173
6305
860
6998
318
6998
318
7865
522
9147
020
1047
9406
1047
9406
1047
9406
447
1342
5927
1513
0943
1680
1605
1680
1605
1888
7958
2197
2919
2517
4005
2517
4005
2517
4005
471
3153
5156
3551
8958
3944
4133
3944
4133
4435
4258
5159
8009
5911
8234
5911
8234
5911
8234
495
7252
2016
8165
6325
9070
1880
9070
1880
1020
0426
811
8679
661
1359
7908
813
5979
088
1359
7908
8
519
1636
1022
018
4167
767
2045
7770
220
4577
702
2300
9805
026
7714
806
3067
4522
130
6745
221
3067
4522
1
543
3624
5105
540
7928
442
4531
8501
045
3185
010
5097
4548
059
3117
732
6795
9370
867
9593
708
6795
9370
8
567
7895
4863
288
8501
021
9870
9618
698
7096
186
1110
3569
7812
9196
4951
1480
3495
6814
8034
9568
1480
3495
68
Page 86 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 59
The
tab
le s
how
s th
e de
com
posi
tion
of t
he F
ouri
er c
oeffi
cien
ts m
ulti
plyi
ng q
−D/24 in
the
func
tion
hg,3 2
(τ) i
nto
irre
duci
ble
repr
esen
tati
ons χn o
f U6(2) -
pa
rt IV
−D
χ29
χ30
χ31
χ32
χ33
χ34
χ35
χ36
χ37
−9
00
00
00
00
0
150
00
00
00
00
390
00
00
00
00
631
10
00
01
00
872
20
00
12
02
111
88
33
34
83
5
135
2424
1313
1317
3516
32
159
9595
6969
6977
118
8912
3
183
322
322
267
267
267
306
424
367
517
207
1124
1124
1011
1011
1011
1113
1471
1390
1822
231
3633
3633
3411
3411
3411
3763
4830
4796
6268
255
1144
411
444
1101
911
019
1101
912
011
1514
015
497
1986
4
279
3416
434
164
3337
233
372
3337
236
393
4550
647
238
6049
1
303
9854
198
541
9710
497
104
9710
410
5478
1310
1413
7526
1749
34
327
2729
1827
2918
2703
7227
0372
2703
7229
3697
3636
5638
3784
4879
25
351
7320
5573
2055
7276
1272
7612
7276
1278
9280
9750
5310
3303
313
1027
4
375
1901
107
1901
107
1893
498
1893
498
1893
498
2053
906
2534
016
2690
675
3411
830
399
4801
562
4801
562
4788
741
4788
741
4788
741
5191
571
6399
104
6805
582
8621
691
423
1180
7813
1180
7813
1178
6521
1178
6521
1178
6521
1277
7678
1574
1552
1675
6387
2122
5130
447
2835
1578
2835
1578
2831
6673
2831
6673
2831
6673
3069
0911
3779
4342
4025
8951
5097
5995
471
6655
7162
6655
7162
6650
0652
6650
0652
6650
0652
7207
5158
8873
6216
9456
0774
1197
2505
6
495
1530
5616
415
3056
164
1529
6572
215
2965
722
1529
6572
216
5771
974
2040
5573
321
7516
112
2753
5524
4
519
3452
1296
934
5212
969
3450
6977
734
5069
777
3450
6977
737
3954
834
4602
6634
249
0719
721
6211
8391
7
543
7647
4065
076
4740
650
7645
1615
176
4516
151
7645
1615
182
8475
182
1019
6072
6410
8722
5658
1376
1741
13
567
1665
6967
1316
6569
6713
1665
3480
0516
6534
8005
1665
3480
0518
0465
8930
2220
8849
0723
6838
0807
2997
7639
88
Page 87 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Tabl
e 60
The
tab
le s
how
s th
e de
com
posi
tion
of t
he F
ouri
er c
oeffi
cien
ts m
ulti
plyi
ng q
−D/24 in
the
func
tion
hg,3 2
(τ) i
nto
irre
duci
ble
repr
esen
tati
ons χn o
f U6(2) -
pa
rt V
−D
χ38
χ39
χ40
χ41
χ42
χ43
χ44
χ45
χ46
−9
00
00
00
00
0
150
00
00
00
00
390
00
00
00
00
630
00
10
00
00
871
11
12
22
20
111
67
79
88
119
9
135
2832
3238
4545
5158
54
159
130
145
145
175
179
179
225
250
255
183
503
566
566
662
715
715
891
1012
1044
207
1846
2060
2060
2457
2536
2536
3233
3662
3861
231
6220
6951
6951
8205
8608
8608
1095
112
474
1321
5
255
1993
722
198
2219
826
322
2727
827
278
3493
439
779
4238
1
279
6035
567
201
6720
179
550
8272
882
728
1058
7812
0825
1288
99
303
1751
4719
4787
1947
8723
0873
2392
0023
9200
3068
3135
0044
3742
14
327
4875
5554
2191
5421
9164
2249
6661
8866
6188
8544
2197
5422
1043
352
351
1310
841
1457
089
1457
089
1726
958
1788
772
1788
772
2296
034
2621
064
2805
657
375
3410
897
3791
267
3791
267
4492
367
4655
102
4655
102
5975
070
6822
630
7304
754
399
8623
112
9583
033
9583
033
1135
7471
1176
2638
1176
2638
1510
2657
1724
4669
1846
8738
423
2122
2871
2358
4843
2358
4843
2794
9916
2895
0941
2895
0941
3717
1558
4244
7872
4546
5426
447
5097
9357
5664
8802
5664
8802
6713
8492
6952
8362
6952
8362
8928
2411
1019
5512
910
9216
491
471
1197
1986
513
3032
283
1330
3228
315
7661
257
1632
8196
016
3281
960
2096
7356
223
9444
613
2565
0971
1
495
2753
6288
830
5972
205
3059
7220
536
2631
248
3755
2463
937
5524
639
4822
4514
055
0717
850
5899
9952
1
519
6211
7238
769
0217
270
6902
1727
081
8019
198
8471
2195
884
7121
958
1087
8694
4612
4235
5809
1330
9995
39
543
1376
1908
4015
2913
4899
1529
1348
9918
1229
9925
1876
7000
2918
7670
0029
2410
1084
3027
5236
4303
2948
8236
57
567
2997
7392
8133
3088
3649
3330
8836
4939
4767
6846
4087
9908
5040
8799
0850
5249
9185
6059
9550
2658
6423
5200
20
Page 88 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
Received: 1 July 2014 Accepted: 15 June 2015
References 1. Benjamin, N., Harrison, S.M., Kachru, S., Paquette, N.M., Whalen, D.: On the elliptic genera of manifolds of Spin(7)
holonomy. arXiv:1412.2804 [hep-th] 2. Benjamin, N, Harrison, S.M., Kachru, S., Paquette, N.M., Whalen, D.: On the elliptic genera of manifolds of Spin(7)
holonomy. arXiv:1412.2804 3. Borcherds, R.E.: Monstrous moonshine and monstrous Lie superalgebras. Invent. Math. 109, 405 (1992) 4. Cheng, M.C.N.: K3 surfaces, N=4 Dyons, and the Mathieu Group M24. Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 4, 623 (2010).
arXiv:1005.5415 [hep-th] 5. Cheng, M.C.N., Dong, X., Duncan, J., Harvey, J., Kachru, S., Wrase, T.: Mathieu moonshine and N = 2 string compactifi-
cations. JHEP 1309, 030 (2013). arXiv:1306.4981 [hep-th] 6. Cheng, M.C.N., Duncan, J.F.R., Harvey, J.A.: Weight one Jacobi forms and umbral moonshine (to appear) 7. Cheng, M.C.N., Duncan, J.F.R.: On Rademacher sums, the largest Mathieu group, and the Holographic modularity of
moonshine. Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 6, 697 (2012). arXiv:1110.3859 [math.RT] 8. Cheng, M.C.N., Duncan, J.F.R.: On the discrete groups of Mathieu moonshine. arXiv:1212.0906 [math.NT] 9. Cheng, M.C.N., Harrison, S.: Umbral moonshine and K3 surfaces. arXiv:1406.0619 [hep-th] 10. Cheng, M.C.N., Harrison, S.M., Kachru, S., Whalen, D.: Exceptional algebra and Sporadic Groups at c = 12.
arXiv:1503.07219 11. Cheng, M.C.N., Duncan, J.F.R.: Rademacher sums and rademacher series. arXiv:1210.3066 [math.NT] 12. Cheng, M.C.N., Harrison, S.M., Kachru, S., Whalen, D.: Exceptional algebra and Sporadic Groups at c = 12.
arXiv:1503.07219 [hep-th] 13. Cheng, M.C.N., Duncan, J.F.R., Harvey, J.A.: Umbral moonshine. arXiv:1204.2779 [math.RT] 14. Cheng, M.C.N., Duncan, J.F.R. Harvey, J.A.: Umbral moonshine and the Niemeier lattices. Research in the Mathemati-
cal Sciences 1:3. arXiv:1307.5793 [math.RT] (2014) 15. Conway, J.H., Norton, S.P.: Monstrous moonshine. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 11, 308 (1979) 16. Conway, J.H., Sloane, N.J.A.: Sphere Packings, Lattices and Groups. Springer, New York (1999) 17. Conway, J.H., Curtis, R.T., Norton, S.P., Parker, R.A., Wilson, R.A.: Atlas of finite groups. Maximal subgroups and ordinary
characters for simple groups. With comput. assist. from J. G. Thackray., Clarendon Press, Oxford (1985) 18. Creutzig, T., Hoehn, G.: Mathieu moonshine and the geometry of K3 surfaces. arXiv:1309.2671 [math.QA] 19. Dabholkar, A., Murthy, S., Zagier, D.: Quantum black holes, wall crossing, and mock modular forms. arXiv:1208.4074
[hep-th] 20. Dijkgraaf, R., Maldacena, J.M., Moore, G.W., Verlinde, E.P.: A black hole farey tail. hep-th/0005003 21. Dixon, L.J., Ginsparg, P.H., Harvey, J.A.: Beauty and the beast: superconformal symmetry in a monster module. Comm.
Math. Phys. 119, 221 (1988) 22. Dobrev, V.K.: Characters of the unitarizable highest weight modules over the N = 2 superconformal algebras. Phys.
Lett. B. 186, 43 (1987) 23. Dong, C., Li, H., Mason, G., Montague, P.S.: The radical of a vertex operator algebra. In: The monster and Lie algebras
(Columbus, OH, 1996), Ohio State Univ. Math. Res. Inst. Publ., 7 (1998) 24. Duncan, J.F.: Super-moonshine for Conway’s largest sporadic group. Duke Math. J. 139(2), 255–315 (2007).
arXiv:math/0502267 25. Duncan, J.F.R., Mack-Crane, S.: Derived equivalences of K3 surfaces and twined elliptic genera (to appear) 26. Duncan, J.F.R., Harvey, J.A.: The umbral mooonshine module for the unique unimodular Niemeier Root System.
arXiv:1412.8191 27. Duncan, J.F.R., Mack-Crane, S.: The moonshine module for Conway’s Group. arXiv:1409.3829 28. Duncan, J.F.R., Griffin, M.J., Ono, K.: Proof of the umbral moonshine conjecture. arXiv:1503.01472 29. Duncan, J.F., Frenkel, I.B.: Rademacher sums, moonshine and gravity. Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 5, 849 (2011).
arXiv:0907.4529 [math.RT]] 30. Duncan, J.F.R., Griffin, M.J., Ono, K.: Moonshine. arXiv:1411.6571 31. Eguchi, T., Hikami, K.: Note on twisted elliptic genus of K3 surface. Phys. Lett. B 694, 446 (2011). arXiv:1008.4924
[hep-th] 32. Eguchi, T., Taormina, A.: Unitary representations of the N = 4 superconformal algebra. Phys. Lett. B. 196, 1 (1987) 33. Eguchi, T., Taormina, A.: On the unitary representations of N = 2 and N = 4 superconformal algebras. Phys. Lett. B.
210, 125 (1988) 34. Eguchi, T., Taormina, A.: Character formulas for the N = 4 superconformal algebra. Phys. Lett. B. 200, 315 (1988) 35. Eguchi, T., Ooguri, H., Tachikawa, Y.: Notes on the K3 Surface and the Mathieu group M24. Exper. Math. 20, 91 (2011).
arXiv:1004.0956 [hep-th] 36. Frenkel, I., Lepowsky, J., Meurman, A.: A moonshine module for the monster, in vertex operators in mathematics and
physics (Berkeley, CA 1983), vol. 3, Math. Sci. Res. Inst. Publ., Springer (1985) 37. Frenkel, I., Lepowsky, J., Meurman, A.: Vertex operator algebras and the monster, vol. 134, Pure and Applied Math-
ematics, Elsevier Science (1989) 38. Gaberdiel, M.R., Hohenegger, S., Volpato, R.: Mathieu twining characters for K3. JHEP 1009, 058 (2010).
arXiv:1006.0221 [hep-th] 39. Gaberdiel, M.R., Hohenegger, S., Volpato, R.: Mathieu moonshine in the elliptic genus of K3. JHEP 1010, 062 (2010).
arXiv:1008.3778 [hep-th] 40. Gaberdiel, M.R., Hohenegger, S., Volpato, R.: Symmetries of K3 sigma models. Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 6, 1 (2012).
arXiv:1106.4315 [hep-th]
Page 89 of 89Cheng et al. Mathematical Sciences (2015) 2:13
41. Gaberdiel, M.R., Persson, D., Ronellenfitsch, H., Volpato, R.: Generalised Mathieu moonshine. Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 7, 145 (2013). arXiv:1211.7074 [hep-th]
42. Gaberdiel, M.R., Persson, D., Volpato, R.: Generalised moonshine and holomorphic orbifolds. arXiv:1302.5425 [hep-th] 43. Gannon, T.: Much ado about Mathieu. arXiv:1211.5531 [math.RT] 44. Gannon, T.: Moonshine beyond the monster: the bridge connecting algebras, modular forms, and physics. Cam-
bridge University Press, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (2006) 45. Gepner, D., Noyvert, B.: Unitary representations of SW(3/2,2) superconformal algebra. Nucl. Phys. B. 610, 545 (2001).
arXiv:hep-th/0101116 46. Govindarajan, S.: Unravelling Mathieu moonshine. Nucl. Phys. B 864, 823 (2012). arXiv:1106.5715 [hep-th] 47. Harrison, S., Kachru, S., Paquette, N.M.: Twining genera of (0,4) supersymmetric Sigma models on K3. JHEP 1404, 048
(2014). arXiv: 1309.0510 [hep-th] 48. Harvey, J.A., Murthy, S.: Moonshine in fivebrane spacetimes. JHEP 1401, 146 (2014). arXiv:1307.7717 [hep-th] 49. Hohenegger, S., Stieberger, S.: BPS saturated string amplitudes: K3 elliptic genus and Igusa Cusp form. Nucl. Phys. B
856, 413 (2012). arXiv:1108.0323 [hep-th] 50. Kac, V.: Vertex algebras for beginners. University Lecture Series, American Mathematical Society 10 (1988) 51. Kiritsis, E.: Character formulae and the structure of the representations of the N = 1, N = 2 superconformal algebras.
Int. J. Mod. Phys. A. 3, 1871 (1988) 52. Kostelecky, V.A., Lechtenfeld, O., Lerche, W., Samuel, S., Watamura, S.: Conformal techniques, bosonization and tree
level string amplitudes. Nucl. Phys. B. 288, 173 (1987) 53. Manschot, J., Moore, G.W.: A modern farey tail. Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 4, 103 (2010). arXiv:0712.0573 [hep-th] 54. Neumann, C.D.D.: The elliptic genus of Calabi-Yau 3-folds and 4-folds: product formulae and generalized Kac–Moody
algebras. J. Geom. Phys. 29, 5 (1999). arXiv:hep-th/9607029 55. Ono, K., Rolen, L., Trebat-Leder, S.: Classical and umbral moonshine: connections and p-adic properties. J. Ramanujan
Math. Soc. (to appear) (arXiv e-prints (2014)) 56. Persson, D., Volpato, R.: Second quantized Mathieu moonshine. arXiv:1312.0622 [hep-th] 57. Raum, M.: M24-twisted product expansions are Siegel modular forms. arXiv:1208.3453 [math.NT] 58. Shatashvili, S.L., Vafa, C.: Superstrings and manifold of exceptional holonomy. Selecta Math. 1, 347 (1995).
arXiv:hep-th/9407025 59. Taormina, A., Wendland, K.: The overarching finite symmetry group of Kummer surfaces in the Mathieu group M24.
JHEP 1308, 125 (2013). arXiv:1107.3834 [hep-th] 60. Taormina, A., Wendland, K.: The symmetries of the tetrahedral kummer surface in the Mathieu group M24.
arXiv:1008.0954 [hep-th] 61. Taormina, A., Wendland, K.: Symmetry-surfing the moduli space of Kummer K3s. arXiv:1303.2931 [hep-th] 62. Witten, E.: Three-dimensional gravity revisited. arXiv:0706.3359 [hep-th] 63. Wrase, T.: Mathieu moonshine in four dimensional N = ∞ theories. JHEP 1404, 069 (2014). arXiv:1402.2973
[hep-th] 64. Zwegers, S.: Mock theta functions. arXiv:0807.4834 [math.NT]