Mobile Banking— · Consumer use of Mobile Banking has increased over the last year. Previously,...
Transcript of Mobile Banking— · Consumer use of Mobile Banking has increased over the last year. Previously,...
Mobile Banking—How Financial Institutions are Reacting One Year Later
© 2012 RateWatch | Sales and Service: 1.800.348.1831 | www.rate-watch.com
Providing Financial Data For Over 20 Years
Mobile Banking—How Financial Institutions are Reacting...One Year Later | Page 2
Introduction
In an era of record low interest rates and no forecast for change in the next 2 years, financial institutions must now focus on other areas for differentiation. Consumers are more informed than ever carefully comparing rates, fees and services before selecting an institution. They continue to monitor these factors throughout the relationship willing to switch at any time. The fight is on among financial institutions and one service exploding with attention is Mobile Banking.
Mobile Banking use has been increasing significantly over the last two years with nearly 90% of Americans owning a mobile phone and 29% of those using Mobile Banking. That number is projected to grow to over 50% in the coming years according to Javelin Strategy & Research. Institutions are feeling the pressure to offer this service and to find new and exciting ways for consumers to access their finances through this high-tech process. Simple text messages are not enough anymore, but consumers demand convenience and speed with such things as tablet optimization and personal remote deposit capture.
RateWatch conducted an industry wide survey to identify how financial institutions are adopting the Mobile Banking Strategy.
This survey was accomplished by emailing 29.423 surveys on October 11, 2012 to contacts at 11,726 different Financial Institutions across the country; 921 unique responses were received.
Survey Results - Total Respondents
Question 1: Do you currently offer Mobile Banking services?
While a large number of financial institutions have added Mobile Banking as a service in the previous year, not everyone has jumped on the bandwagon just yet. Just over 50% of respondents are not currently offering Mobile Banking. That percentage will continue to decline, however, with over 50% of those that do not offer now planning to add the service in the next year despite citing security and cost as top concerns holding them back.
49.19% of institutions are currently offering Mobile
Banking services - an 8.6% increase over one year ago.
YesNo49.19%50.81%
Mobile Banking—How Financial Institutions are Reacting...One Year Later | Page 3
Survey Results - Total Respondents
Question 2: If no, to what extent are the following concerns holding you back?
Abili
ty to
Serv
ice/
Mai
ntai
n
Spee
d
Secu
rity
Highly Concerning
Very Concerning
Moderately Concerning
Slightly Concerning
Not ConcerningPe
rson
aliz
atio
n
Cost
Highly Concerning 34.32% 3.58% 14.66% 35.01% 7.55%
Very Concerning 27.23% 10.74% 29.79% 26.54% 11.56%
Moderately Concerning 23.57% 38.19% 30.73% 24.26% 36.56%
Slightly Concerning 8.47% 18.14% 13.00% 8.70% 22.41%
Not Concerning 6.41% 29.36% 11.82% 5.49% 21.93%
Security Speed Ability to Service/Maintain
Cost Personalization
The levels of concern for each issue remained consistent from 2011 to 2012.
Mobile Banking—How Financial Institutions are Reacting...One Year Later | Page 4
Survey Results - Total Respondents
Question 3: When do you plan to add the service?
In th
e ne
xt 3
mon
ths
In th
e ne
xt 6
mon
ths
In th
e ne
xt 1
2 m
onth
s
We
have
no
defin
ite
timef
ram
e35.45%
20.00%14.32% 16.14%
We
do n
ot p
lan
to o
ffer
at th
is tim
e
14.09%
Question 4: What features will be part of your Mobile Banking? Check all that apply
72.35%
96.31%100%87.56%
70.97%
27.65%33.18% 32.26%
*Respondents who answered "we do not plan to offer at this time" went on to question 18. Respondents who answered "In the next 3 months, 6 months, 12 months or we have no definite timeframe" went on to question 4.
11.06% 7.83% 4.61%
21.20%
Oth
er
0.46%
Chec
k Ac
coun
t Bal
ance
s
Tran
sfer
Fun
ds
Acco
unt A
lert
s
Mak
e Lo
an P
aym
ents
Pay
Bills
P2P
Pers
on-t
o-Pe
rson
Tran
sfer
s
A2A
Acco
unt-
to-
Acco
unt T
rans
fers
Rem
ote
Dep
osit
Capt
ure
Busin
ess A
ccou
nt
Acce
ss
Mob
ile W
alle
t
Cred
it Ap
plic
atio
ns
Ope
n an
Acc
ount
One year ago, 39.10% had plans to add Mobile Banking within 12 months. Currently, 50.46% will be looking to add the service in the coming year.
Mobile Banking—How Financial Institutions are Reacting...One Year Later | Page 5
Survey Results - Total Respondents
Question 5: If yes to Question 1, how long have you been offering this service?
Question 6: Which Mobile Banking vendor do you use?
About RateWatchSince 1989, RateWatch has been providing financial institutions with a variety of tools to accurately assess their position within their marketplace. Providing competitive rate and fee data for deposit and loan products, clients across the country map out their position and confidently make pricing decisions to maximize profit potential. With additional products and services to analyze market share, product line offerings, and historical trends, competitive comparisons and self-analyses are well rounded. Owned by TheStreet, Inc, based in New York, NY, RateWatch headquarters are in Fort Atkinson, WI.
For more information: www.rate-watch.com (P) 800.348.1831 (E) [email protected]
Less than 6 months
6 months - less than 1 year
1 year - less than 2 years
2 years - less than 3 years
16.28%
9.16%
28.75%
16.03%
3 or more years
29.77% Access Softek
First Data
FIS
Fiserv
2.31%
6.15%
2.82%
8.46%
Harland Financial Services
28.21%
Intuit 10.26%
Jack Henry 13.59%
Wescom 0.77%
Other 27.44%
Mobile Banking—How Financial Institutions are Reacting...One Year Later | Page 6
Survey Results - Total Respondents
Question 7: Which Mobile Banking services do you offer? Check all that apply
Question 8: What percentage of your customers/members use Mobile Banking?
Text
Mobile version of your website
iPhone App
iPad App 27.76%
68.89%
68.64%
77.63%
Android App 60.67%
Android Tablet App 18.25%
Blackberry App 22.11%
Other 1.80%
Less than 5%
5% - less than 25%
25% - less than 50%
50% - less than 75%
75% or greater
50.99%
38.59%
6.48%1.13% 2.82%
Text and Mobile Website availability have decreased from 2011 (down from 72.76% and 83.87% respectively) while iPhone, Android and Blackberry Apps have all increased (up from 49.03%, 35.48% and 20.65%) with Android Apps making the largest jump.
Consumer use of Mobile Banking has increased over the last year. Previously, institutions cited 55.63% of customers using the services less than 5% of the time. The most significant increase was seen in the 75% or greater category with 0% of institutions seeing any use this high in 2011.
Mobile Banking—How Financial Institutions are Reacting...One Year Later | Page 7
Survey Results - Total Respondents
Question 9: Rank the tasks your customers/members can perform using your Mobile Banking in order of popularity.(1 is the most popular and 12 is the least popular. An average is calculated based on the number of responses each item received for each value 1-12.)
Check Account Balances
Transfer Funds
Pay Bills
Account Alerts
#1 (1.64 Rating Avg)
A2A Account-to-Account Transfers
Make Loan Payment
Business Account Access
Remote Deposit Capture
P2P Person-to-Person Transfers
Mobile Wallet
Credit Applications
Open an account
#2 (2.94 Rating Avg)
#3 (4.18 Rating Avg)
#4 (4.28 Rating Avg)
#5 (4.42 Rating Avg)
#6 (4.86 Rating Avg)
#7 (5.84 Rating Avg)
#8 (6.16 Rating Avg)
#9 (6.22 Rating Avg)
#10 (7.20 Rating Avg)
#11 (7.43 Rating Avg)
#12 (7.48 Rating Avg)
Mobile Banking—How Financial Institutions are Reacting...One Year Later | Page 8
Survey Results - Total Respondents
Question 10: What effect has offering Mobile Banking had on your institution?
Reve
nue
IT C
ost
Bran
ch Tr
affic
Increased
Decreased
Stayed the Same
Youn
ger C
lient
ele
Clie
nt L
oyal
ty
Increased Decreased Stayed the Same
Branch Traffic 1.19% 11.34% 87.46% 100%
IT Cost 61.79% 2.69% 35.52% 100%
Revenue 8.43% 8.13% 83.43% 100%
Client Loyalty 55.52% 0.30% 44.18% 100%
Younger Clientele 56.12% 0.00% 43.88% 100%
Cost per Checking Account 23.51% 12.80% 63.69% 100%
Staffing 2.09% 2.09% 95.82% 100%
Total
Staf
fing
Cost
per
Che
ckin
g Ac
coun
t
Mobile Banking—How Financial Institutions are Reacting...One Year Later | Page 9
Survey Results - Total Respondents
Question 11: Rank the following marketing channels in order of marketing dollars you spend on each.
Question 12: What were your initial investment requirements to offer Mobile Banking?
Website
Radio Advertising
Newspaper Advertising
Foot traffic/onsite Advertising
Direct Mail
Email Marketing
Less than $2,500
$2,500 - less than $10,000
$10,000 - less than $20,000
$20,000 - less than $40,000
$40,000 or greater
43.93%
19.67%
10.49%
3.61%
22.30%
#1 (2.79 Rating Avg)
#2 (2.94 Rating Avg)
#3 (2.95 Rating Avg)
#4 (3.24 Rating Avg)
#5 (3.25 Rating Avg)
#6 (3.91 Rating Avg)
In general, financial institutions are paying more in 2012 to enter Mobile Banking. In 2011, 36.81% invested less than $2,500, while only 41.67% invested $2,500 - less than $10,000, 13.19% invested $10,000 - less than $20,000 and 3.47% invested $20,000 less than $40,000. 2012 did see a decrease in those investing $40,000 or greater with 4.86% investing this amount in 2011.
Mobile Banking—How Financial Institutions are Reacting...One Year Later | Page 10
Survey Results - Total Respondents
Question 13: How much does your Mobile Banking vendor charge as a flat monthly fee?
Question 14: How much does your Mobile Banking vendor charge as a monthly per user fee?
Question 15: How do you charge your customers/members for Mobile Banking? Check all that apply
Som
e ac
coun
ts h
ave
mon
thly
fees
Som
e ac
coun
ts h
ave
per u
se L
og In
fee
Som
e ac
coun
ts a
re fr
ee
Char
ge fo
r ind
ivid
ual
serv
ices
such
as B
ill P
ay,
RDC,
Tran
sfer
s, et
c.
3.93%6.56%5.57% 0.33%
Char
ge fo
r app
0.66%
All a
ccou
nts a
re fr
ee
88.52%
Less than $250
$250 - less than $500
$500 - less than $1,000
$1,000 or greater10.49%
15.08%
20%
26.23%
My vendor does not charge a flat monthly fee
28.20%
7.86%
14.29%
21.43%
26.43%
30.08%
2012
2011 Less than $1
$1 - less than $3
$3 - less than $5
$5 or greater0.66%
4.26%
31.15%
30.49%
My vendor does not charge a monthly per
user fee
33.44%
0.72%
2.71%
30.43%
23.91%
42.75%
2012
2011
2012
2011
N/A1.30%1.95% 1.30% 0%
98.05%
Fees have generally increased from 2011 to 2012.
Mobile Banking—How Financial Institutions are Reacting...One Year Later | Page 11
Survey Results - Total Respondents
Question 16: How likely are you to start charging for Mobile Banking in the next 12 months?
Question 17: Why did you start offering Mobile Banking? Check all that apply
To be the thought leader
To attract younger generations
Mobile Banking is a must in today's environment
To compete with larger institutions
61.97%
86.89%
24.59%
65.90%
Other 2.95%90.37%
9.26%
0.37%
Not likely Somewhat likely Very likely
More institutions in 2011 were not likely to start charging for Mobile Banking (97.39%), however there were also more very likely to start charging ( 1.31%).
Fewer institutions are concerned about being a thought leader or attracting a younger generation in 2012 (down from 29.61% and 76.97% respectively in 2011). Competition appears to be more of a trigger in 2012 with an additional 9% of institutions citing this as a motivating factor.
Mobile Banking—How Financial Institutions are Reacting...One Year Later | Page 12
Survey Results - Total Respondents
Question 18: Please indicate your institution's asset size.
Question 19: Please indicate your institution's type.
$200
Mill
ion
- les
sth
an $
500
Mill
ion
$100
Mill
ion
- les
sth
an $
200
Mill
ion
Less
than
$10
0 M
illio
n
20.09%17.92%27.25% 23.67%
4.45%6.62%
Did
not
ans
wer
$1 B
illio
n or
gr
eate
r
$500
Mill
ion
- les
s th
an $
1 Bi
llion
Did
not
ans
wer
Cred
it Un
ion
Bank
23.67%23.13%
49.84%
3.37%
Savi
ngs &
Loa
n
Mobile Banking—How Financial Institutions are Reacting...One Year Later | Page 13
Survey Results - Total Respondents
Question 20: Please indicate the state your institution is mainly located.
Results presented by region
Sout
h Ce
ntra
l
East
ern
Cent
ral
10%
25%33%
8%
Wes
tern
24% of respondents did not indicate the state their institution is located in.