* F

210 SPILLTWAY COEPFICMMENTS

'H - total head above the crest, including the velocity head of approach,in feet (Fig. 1);

Hf. design'head for. a standard crest, including the velocity head ofapproach; in:fet . .

:h velocity head of-approach, v2/2 g, in feet (Fig. 1); -L: spillway crest length, in feet;

P depth of the approach channel,crest to river bed, infeet (Fig: 1(a));Q total discharge;'incubic feet'pbr'second; . ' "

f average velocity of approach; in feet perasecond; andX, Y crest coordinates, in feet. :: . ! .- : . "

* - ' :. ;

. . . " ,..- .

SYNOPSISThis paper describes the historical efforts made to provide drainage and

water control for central and southern Florida. Distribution and utilization ofwater in the comprehensive plan for flood control and multiple purposes aredescribed. The need for a secondary water-control plan is emphasized.

INTRODUOCTION

The area described in this paper (Fig. 1) lies south of an east-west linethrough Lake Harney (about 35 miles north of Cocoa) in Florida in the St.Johns River basin and east of the ridge that extends through Haines City andSebring. The ridge divides the waters which flow into the Atlantic Ocean andthose which flow into the Gulf of Mexico. Water-control problems are quitecommon throughout the area, although there are a few variations in topographyand soil. The area consists of approximately 15,000 sq miles of- grciveland,pastures, rich agricultural lands, lakes, and marshlands. Ekivations range fromapproximately 7 ft in the vicinity of Miami and 15 it around Lake Okeechobeeto 80 ft in the area of the headwaters of the Kissimmee River basin. : (Allstages and elevations throughout this paper refer to mean sea level data.)However, the lands of a large part of the area are'extremely flat, and naturalwater courses are not common. Except for the St. Johns River, the KissimmeeRiver, Fisheating Creek, and a few minor streams, most of the water control is

-accomplished by man-made canals and drainage districts. Suils in the: areavary from sand to peat with a small amount of mart. The areas with higherelevations in the St. Johns and Kissimmee River basins consist of sand mixedwith a small amount of organic material in the upper 6 in. to 12 in. In the lowareas and marshes, deposits of peat of thicknesses ranging to several feet arefound' The Everglades is covered with a layer of peat of thickness ranging toapproximately 15 ft at Lake Okeechobee and gradually diminishing to zero at

AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERSPounded November 5. 1852

TRANSACTIONS . .

Paper No. 2856

WATER CONTROL IN CENTRAL ANDSOUTHERN FLORIDA

BY HAROLD A. SCOTT," M. ASCE

'1 -

.5

_ on.-Publihed, essendafly a srinted her, In October, 1954, as Frece&enoeqara. No. FB.e.r htlea n are thos in effect, when i. p r wa approved for publication tn Trmfaciions.

Cobs E-Rr., old., Smith, and W, Jacksona. , Ft.211

210

.i

?P"-

SPILJ,WAY' COEFFICIENTS

. R = total head above the crest, including the velocity head of appr~aoh; in feet (Fig. 1); . . 'h d f

H. = design head for'l~ ata~,dard c:eet, including. the~eloclty ea. o. approach, in: feet i" I , '., .... , '

h = velocity head ofa.pproach, 1P/2 g, in feet (Fl~. 1);' .. , .' L ''';''spillway crest length, in feet; ,. ..," .' . ."....' p = depth of the approach channel,' crest to rIver bed, ill feet (FIg,l ~a!) ~ Q = total discharge,"in cubic feet' par-second;.' .' . ."' :,:" 1I = average velocity of approach;ill feet per second i and .. ' '. >.

. X, Y =' crest, coordinates, in feet.'. ::. '.' . I'~, '.'" ' "", , : .. ,', : I:,:: .".'"

.' .;

."

.....

',"

:jt":II .. il .. ' ',j

' '':f ' ....

.: ~'. , '. j ~.' .: " 'I. "

: ~: . ,I

"

, .. '; ~~ , . .-:

" ,. . 'f :. "

. :: :. . :\1:. 01 -. .

. ,

1" " ,j:, . ,l'

+ri-i'io' ' Its t',

AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS Poonded Nonmber 5. 1852

TRANSACTIONS

Paper No. 2856

WATER CONTROL IN CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA

By HAROLD A. SCOIT,l M. ASCE

SYNOPSIS

This paper describes the historical efforts made to provide drainage and water control for central and southern Florida. Distribution and utilization of water in the comprehensive plan for flood control and multiple purposes are describl)d. The need for a secondary wa.ter-control pla.n is emphasized.

IwrnODUC'l'ION

The area described in this paper (Fig. 1) lies south of an east-west lin~ through Lake Harney (about 35 miles north of Cocoa) in Florida in the St. Johns River basin and east of the ridge that extends through Raines City and Sebring. 'The ridge di"Vides the waters whIch flow into the Atlantic Ocean and those which flow into the Gulf 'of Mexico. Water-control problems are. quite common throughout the stea, a.lthough there are a few variations in topography and soil. The area consists of approxima.tely 15,000 sq miles of- groveland, Pastures, rich agricultural lands, lakes, and ml1rshlands. EI~"ations range from approximately 7 ft in the vi.cinity of Miami andl!> fi around Lake Okeechobee to 80 ft in the area of the headwaters of the' Kissimmee River basin. : (A.ll stages and elevations throughout this paper refer to mee.n sea. level da.ta.) However, the lands of a Ia.rge part of the area are: extremely flat, and natural

'. water COUfses are not common. Except for the St. Johns River, the ~mee River, Fii!heating Creek, and a few minor streams, most of the water- control is accomplished by man-made canals and drainage dietrich!. Soils in the: area.

vary from sand to peat with s. small amount of marl. The areas with higher elevations in the St. Johns and Kissimmee River basins consist of sllnd. mixed . with a small amount of organic material in the upper 6 in. to 12 in. In the low . and marshes, deposits of peat of thickn6l!ses ranging to several feet are found; The Everglades is covered with a layer of peat of thickness ranging to

.' approxims.teiy 15 it at Lake Okeechobee and gradually diminishing to zero at Non.-l'ubliahed. esaentlaJ/y ..., printed here. In October, 19l14, 1\8 Pro

... CDQ000020080021 I-I.

/1< '-'~[~ lIlY II - ,,--"/.-". .- . ... 1 S. Attachment A2 -"--

S....... -, ---.--... - -..-.-.. --... -. ------........ .. . . .. . . . . .

\ ;' \.4:\ L /i4~..-%.... I--i"Rf H fill,"

,-2 3-.

0 -. Il.

14

I

\4 --- ..,~4?o SECTION A-A,

-

4'oo 0-0 11

* .o-Field joint Fleld oinot -Soe d*toit 00..232 D- 72SECTION aB- Irold so,.r 4or

------,----;F : I- .

" -4.. .. . +.

I 0 0o 00o0 04 t' 0-S' .....0I I ,.---.-'H.. . --- ='.oO

:Yn - .,,, d.q . before

-A

hW so t hold t -J 1. . .. ."I.M..

ml d to for. side ofooql oI s'o or .-3-tS5,oreo00-ooldod'

, Otrad-..

S -3% - U

- .... . Y. II0,'t,-, Sectio O-O similar

/ , o ooooot gotMtootoo Tto

/~a bot wit e000 s~,o

_., ......... ......-/'0

"rao O7.... "

iSos dotot,0o 202-0-77

'- -foro'o d,, - -

,_I i..-al't it. ..... .

F- 'c.. 0o

"0,o, p'".73f '-, ..--" " ,'E:" ,.VAWINGsx. ,

Tyia-p Ch k'. l.o ,

0~0-. ' 4, .. ,, stiff.t--4.t t

~~Oo~tO--V stif0 0010CR0110,'~~~ec, 23hrlo0, wors00o"

' . L - E ND E L E A ,T IO N 4 01, "1 " R' A D I L GA T E , ' . .I pIh ",. AT" ASSEMBL-Y RoLLED. GoI'bER TYPE'

Ood ~ ~ ~ ~ V 501 o7 0-.10..

.. .- .O. 00; 0 0. .A.AL GAT , 0005 -.. .-=0-.'%,,,,,. 0 -0,,-,. ... . . ...

" : .,"- ; -" . o... -t-d -

.... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d ta..: -.0:7.2"6< [ :- ,.,,,- .. .

0./

__L__ _ W- ... d-7-0 00.0i of - Z--.O--r-'- _-i ofIffo.7,- ; od 00lId. r, ohoa

-- --0, , ' - " . I -- " -.. .. ..-- . . . J-IL . .. . .. . .

U. 0

,.?

--- - l ------00 -. . . . . ...

Do 5,0i 41

00."I 4's~ 0-*~.= 4_.dio .boLl'--9

. . ... PSTRF1AM ELEVA'IION.1:

-.".. "*'- ". " " " ..W0

- . .

-- - 00-R0~' --

0 .*0 - -00 0.. - ,Oo.~ f~O's5.' -- - 0 - - -

. .-.. -

~o".c. ~ -- - 00 . 0 0 .- ~il~~Z0 ht~

.;

':;,'

i. _ - ' ;"'-;.-.' r'-i

L...I C_D-.,;Q.;...:,O_OO.;...O_2-:-00_B_O....,...02.....,1,.............J1.

'\".

';,',1"'

IAttachment A2

.... Trash.. shkJd -,

-5.J..- .-:~ ... '-s

'SECT/ON C-C 5f!ction D-D similar

.4-

-A,,-

- ~'fl4 s.v 7'-A

i~ii:ii~i:i~ii~iii:~ii !AttachmentA3 '-:! -jii!i !l:i~~ii.! ~.

li

.1 I - rnWN'.

'*1NON OVERFLOW ION

Al --

Op.fft - .... - ---.- 'A

A SPILLWAY SECTrOFJ

- ~'A' ~ A - -

1I~. - *-~

ICDQ000020080021 lAttachment A4

110

105

100

95

90

80

75

70

65

60

55

500.55

POOL

?H.-

C GATE SEAT

DEFINITION SKETCH

LEGEND

TEST GATE SEAT (X/Hd)MODEL DATA

CW 801,AVERAGE 0.000CW 801, AVERAGE 0.167WHITNEY DAMAVERAGE 0.127

PROTOTYPE DATACENTER HILL.AVERAGE 0.111

0.60 0.65 0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95DISCHARGE COEFFICIENT (C)

FORMULAo =CG. 2--9H

WHERE:Go=NET GATE OPENINGB=GATE WIDTHH=HEAD TO CENTER OF GATE OPENING

TAINTER GATES ONSPILLWAY CRESTS

DISCHARGE COEFFICIENTSHYDRAULIC DESIGN CHART 311-I

WES 3-56

ICOQ000020080021

110

105

100

95

90

8.';

If) w W II:

" w 80 0

~ ~

7.';

70

6.';

60

55

50 0 . .';5

SUGGESTED DESIGN CURVE FOR X/Hd=O.O

0.60 0.8.'; 0.70

. SUGGESTED DESIGN CURVE FOR X/Hd=O./ TO 0.3

IAttachment A4

DEFINITION SKETCH

SYMBOL

V A

o o

0.7.';

LEGEND

TEST

MODEL DATA

CW BOI, AVERAGE CW 801, AVERAGE WHITNEY DAM, AVERAGE

PROTOTYPE DATA CENTER HILL, AVERAGE FORT GIBSON, AVERAGE WOODS RESERVOIR DAM

0.80 0.85

0.000 0.187 0.127

0.111 0.137 0.3:1:

0.90 0.9.';

DISCHARGE COEFFICIENT (C)

FORMULA Q=CGoBv'2gH

WHERE: Go=NET GATE OPENING B=GATE WIDTH H=HEAD TO CENTER OF GATE OPENING

TAINTER GATES ON SPILLWAY CRESTS

DISCHARGE COEFFICIENTS HYDRAULIC DESIGN CHART 311-1

.CDQ000020080021 j.Attachment X A5

~0'A,

/

7

\~6

6

.-- ,--a - .. ..... . . . ... ... - ;O" " , , b 'r7 - . ........... ...-- .. ...---- " --- "-"-"----

Ow I 0I 05T. - k" . - tO" .

' .O _ I . 17 . / " ~

_--_-...

. ......___- .... .... 7-- 11 tzZ oh..po

2 ., .I- . .. . ' PAt

L NVtW ,

-- --- -

--- - --

- ----

--

---

600--o/n=pj-, snA- - --- Th,,f-oro-ho-b..NCO.R or-/ ... _orfi-u-nqet .

/T.. ,i ANCHOR OLT- - - N O /

S63.7

. .. .tote-s, or orD ' . - '" ,, .

t:O .on, #

.1 1 .- I--orrrooho.d:by Lokooldo,

I / " El

. . . :._ -- - - , 1 / :-7 - , - - , - I." i

ANCH R Lo 4.

.

,.

o

S, p h * 7T- E - - . . , -

.;r , Z

X-4 NOTES. .. . . , "- ': " " S E CT IO N T H R OU G H G RIL/ L AI E . " " " o s/ o t .e f "r

P .

e r.M - r 6 5 0

-t.0-E C of

.Ni

Ken nu"' GRILL AGE SECTION A A N SCL-.N

, a 2.'

.0,, O,6.. .. .,- ..o.e..n... ,,nnuoo- .-- I.. ....( of :' ,:,~~tt 0.eon. '" i'.o,- o f.int. .. . C " IC _ "o s -4-"-.0".

SE--.. "..,1't hl:- __: -: . :. 1b M -l f

-V. ; ,,, : _: _ f.... .:.'_::. h .. ... ...-

,. U b A - T o r . -ond I lst to n o at o . .. . .e t O t . O ? 4 S TRU C U R L -T E A f. - . ' N o

',An2 n, far Ag5Z002P

T"O:.l . ' ' 500,0"I'17 W H E + LEs nD A .

"~_S G 7.....1 -1: IJ-@,, " I l-.

. .. .on 'j.e.. . . .leo-n-do- hr onto-- onlt. o of. . port. n :on .s

IuL Is - SECIO7~ ~ _. 1-

'GRIL LAG E-WALL PLA rES-SILLS

boG ..o. "-sTlo IoeUp "" IE " "

BRACAT NDANCORBOTS

nyn . . ,. " $TunTy#Ag.TE , "."or ., or BR

N E pA PGS o~a~ros" .A. - "- -.

' soonot flQy.er- 6- -16

non" . Few LL " ' .." A ,i, o n- . 00 -. .r. . . -aorrty r a r .- f . ... = . Se-.= en . 332 - :

I

" . -..-......- "c.i .7- . . .- , Pt"e; . t_/- < ,. .." -' .. ..... : - ,.." . .. .. . 0 ;4 j --. , ..I ., . - .. ,

:: .. -:-.. -;:::~ .. ;~-"~~~~~ .. 7:-"-"-:-:,,"" .. ~ ... ',:,.."--o:..:.;:;...:-' :"'(" ~ . ... '-ICDQ000020080021

.. -.. - - ...... - .............. --:::: .... r" .. "' ....

/ /

1 .. :.-:

"' ...

"

\.. ....

'. @,j PIN,siflM

STEEL - q.O REQV/RFfJ LAMINAT./ON:{

.. I.~~~'-." ,.'

( ........

' ........

ICDQ00002008002 1 LAttachment B1I

I|WAR MPARTMEf

I~INHmIIi-IIIur

.~V..?.: -

ICOQ000020080021 I

. Nct/l.l . . ~. :. "AII""~r~ t!tII_nlOr.6I1HDmDf'l'tf/VIs~

/run",';", only, ~/r. /iJdnr.l4fitms .5MUM CilrrMu" '. . ~.A.a,SiJ'Y .~qW 1htt3e '~~'7~~1'J'C1r: '

.i

IAttachment 81

ICDQ000020080021 l '.- ~Attachment

Cl

~

C1

? : ::: ; *7 N Th

~i Z -S t ii KEY PLANio:', i~~i: .i:. :, :&s k r', co

#i!Z-; ' C'*

DETAIJL

P~AN< *:

K K

YW W1-11

DLETA IL E C M N ~ 4 ~ ~ A 0 C f

I .

-...-. C..rs-W.r-X' S&UTHTRWhswAY&-

I AADJ'P PLAFORM4CON,:PE TIE

-PLAN, 5ETIOM5 DETIVI"F!!!i!ii

WHEELER PROJECTTENN ESSEE4AVFHORMY,

0 :7z J"Y-477"'-1 -6 61 1 3 1 C 1 4 161'N'4-900 PP

p

7,CDQ000020080021.

-... r

'lAttachment B3 . .'P,"' :,,3I! . I

~Of~~jI I

,~t~ : /77\\% x\%

(IL" ' 4'' i- 'i I; I 0N,./ /' K0 A'dCOAj "\ 4 C.e ,

o ., = .............. no 100 jC_-----_0/CCtt ANOCO~

?LAR .A/

Se " .- , PLAN ,I.,I

FI.C..I0 . .

. *.,ooC;, *. COO/CC' 400'.C-~. COCI'OCI *0~,i, ~,5 c4~-. K 4-44. C/ftp.0W/At,.. ISACO . 40.141 . CC C.CMCC'.K 0/SACS .- Ck tCCA~CC ACAC C/AC ICMo,..C CPtOCOC.0.0CC 0,440

L r4 ~ CorAl 006CC4. 510CC . CAOO* -

- 'I00

43/CO. 0.60 ~. .056 C040OCC/CCCE/S*J . I b ~-

~rPAr4

Tflj~ ~Z~7A1 nnCo....CI&~SAlCAAO

C/KIM ~.CCC0/OCC/ft00C C< olClooyooo LICC00C,-~' I liii I~Ih,f~fCCCCA/AICS AC ~ C4C3~ . C/30~OCCC/4It ~0L

/ I, C . , . oC . , .- C C 0 / / - - 6 A C t ' P 6 C C 0 9 .

~.C0,gC 'g ,. ,..-" , "" '. . . - " .. OC* "~ 0 KICC. SO/oCCLEM rCVA770W -Asec. oN -'I

.- P.C O, 5/ CtA C /C O S 6C COC : . . ,-, o n f 6 /

00.-.

AC106/5

D-D E C-E

Pt

}

C'

'i1

508/. C.OC

MAIN AND ALULIARY LOCKS 15

GENERAL i PLAN "

ELEVATION AND SECTION5"

WHEELER PROJECT 'I . IThNNESSE VLLEY AUTHORITY IC.

maim"IU Al-2-o 1 3 1c 61N2M50 t

.6/ A 40/~ C----C.~ ~

- - - - -- - - - ~ '.0/.~ 4~-~ - ~

F~:r?CDQ000020080021

\ I I

I

.~. ,

"F"

..... --

ICDQ000020080021 I lAttachment B4II |

]

PLAN

St'CT/ON A-A FZEVAT/ON C-C

J r. '

DDI

ACOnCAXA COCA 04CM OCX

St 4/tOte

'~~L2:.

A,, ~tIoo.~9 - tq3~~oMp*.oAOXOCoCO.

-f1. " 0.

ICDQ000020080021

--------,L _________ ._--'-______ _ ..1----,-

l-PLAN

SECTION A-A

F-F /

IAttachment B4

i

1r:d.f_n, "- '~ph~u,/t(~{nl.acA.

CONCRETE LAYOUT OF MONOLITHS

J

ICDQ00002008002 I lAttachment B5 I

90SN19 I

1M'LSCAWSE.

] I~2 ___________

- -

II.

t~04~t. A

-- I

SIIJ +

G_

_-_

--- ---

---

?

Kz

JI .,

I TI I " --I IL ?L~L i

I

UI -.. r

'~I

- ~tii~ ~.0. UK

tl

~LI 12? ' ~l

sli

PLAN

/A

'. 4.. : -1;

4 ~4~-~'

.5 -~

~t '4X

4 - - ____________

I**St.fl001L7UsouI/.n.g4I4.~0I

0.00004.4400~S~4*ZX4

7 207440(4i44*40) E*2SO0

- j~4.5~j& -

-, JO 'Sc

04~ 0s,.2 4E~

- ~- -

4 4b&0 14424

AUXI LIAR Y LOCK

CONCRETEUPPER END

PLAN & SECTIONS"WHEELER PROJECT

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITYB B

II

IIII

MY -~I4f,~j -

S('CTION A-A

554144t505 44450,4400:0444,, 554 500

-1

..... t r- y , L.. r -", ; I "' IA.;, ,

L-'C_D_Q_O_OO_O_2_00_B_O_02_1 ____ ' IAttachment 85

9OSNI9

. rIN~

':. EI.$~ ';. :-.,",.=;.,. . ... ~

II -",;~

CDQ000020080021 I lAttachment B6I I

METHOD D'- PP'ESTPESSING DJAECAVALSPpOtAoAaOY:

Th. 0.2 t,..42 6. ao.'.4

. 050.1.4,0004,0 It,. 0. ~0,. ~0e00- 4'j0~0nf 70.'.,..- .,s a,,.. .4,, - .4,,ha,, b.O.% sIt.ogM .,'2.09.04.0.1 0, it,.o,,' aa 02/A. ott., 0~, It,. aaa-. a., ,0., a..2A,,t.S tat Ole q.a, Ole?. at-b,',, n'. ,,,to *h.,, 6..~~~ 0,t.aa.0a04.,

~ Shfa,.db 00. pot' aot.ItMo0.,,IA,.....,t.,d.~~000100400 000/ * 0010010.0 16. tOo.,,, I, -. o,,0/l.0 pootOk.

7,,. an 0ttt~4,. 0~S ~IO 60,.,, 1 dt~o,., ~ a .0.e lot to,'?. -- Ito." Oft 6.5 * .001400.0

4, 'o~S 4.,,. IrS.",O 0.-. .0/. oN-. a~oA.~rAo 6000.604,.

AO&5fl/A5S'AO Lv0,atcra.ot0- ~ta. iao~ ~o oa. .. 2 o/.. ob.0~.0~iaa'N 00 ~02o

.'*00. o&ao/.., ,.otrN ,a,- St tO. do/kSot doe aaa., ,.0,4,.0 0', h,0'tt,.to.0 fl.o.4. C- ~t*o 0a.&AS .,S .4,j..k. .04 roo.LA~f5T oa~r 0. .tioa,.a

C- ~.4w It'. *420tt~.~ .02 hO It 01., t0

0-sa.'w' b.oe,, ota, aft,. - a. 7,,,, fl,.'..4 ott a. 0.1,,A'

4't ~ O,~VOis,/ ~fl~It~oAd 000004 a, a,.,, Co a A.,. ,6.

0- l*0t~ Nt /anr".,I, A ,6?o atnP*, IdA4 .

' d70 ftt,04,0.12-460. 400.,4,yAO - etyeos .044...

DOWTEAEM ELEVATTON END ELEVATION

0 ~

5004,05

A A57, :1*0.~

11 I Ot-4 or.at,~~0~' 7~Q(p7

o1-ol~I I

ASSUA-ED DIGmRIBUTION OF ANC-OROAGE POLLGIRDER GI

a,, ,'.te a,~t..hti '.0 70 40 *0ott ontO, a ,4.0,. a0,.oota at,, 6 6. 50 t.-.,0 botolo pa .,,,00, SI01 00~0It,1'.604 A'. 114,0go., a- 0104 4.'0.. ft a. .Md,-4t..'4 ."...o .44 a.aSS. '.02. M~ mt.S4, a. a,,.4,, ~ 0 0'. MoM~t7t' 400031040242-51. OSatn,ftMd'., It. d0,.4100.a4p..,t,.0t,.~ ha at,-,." ,.ft.o.d.Oh,- 00,Onw ..t4t,~Ott OttO .04.1, a a..'..t'07. 00.Ittot..,.S1~aSAttO 044001 ,

t/Or ,rarsocs. Ctaflx~)

C... .ttq .Me 00941 142.551614 a.t4t~ a6..----00004

It trotS adO,-~:~.-.-eooo-*at1,

Cmrn.a, A, a,,a,,frt*t/, a.2.2 so',,.,,4. tOO'..,.---20000 -464.00.., A aOft Oka,.- '.00,. It."' ,00,ft,..~54$00.

0 ao.wao 4, O0.C6004Oft..'., 5.00 dat. I, ,te,..

2 ., .S0.StM,.j$Sbd

- ~ 4,,bJ.01 10.41.0/0,-000T.,ok'.4,o04, -a,..----00000On-too." b'.ft00000CW---25~c0OrNItora2444 RO.STaCrftvs05'. 7.pfrI a.t'.rOl 00 ..too- ge/a 000'ft-,~00 nOtor t.,t ."e 004/ ra.a,40-0s 00.00005000

TYPICAL HqORIZONTAL GIRDER? SECTION TYPICAL SKIN & PANEL

0000,000 STt,0ft03 to 005004105.-soOt .4: a. a..'. a,'. ,o-d.'0 .. ta a a. .04.1 ot,-.,. 0,4 a. V.9~'I tt,00 10,10. alt,,., 00040, .9'.,,- It. 004. 2. 'I6 ~6 t.4-t,* o',*,*0000.4t.hOd.t&ate 41a.0,.0

0-It ~

.aG.N'4, dtfl?.,Otr.44,J,.',$.,,e~,A at,., .0200. 0t0.o4~oI04Ir 6.atoan. fl000 pa rpO,- S'.,.bS

at- I'.6.os/s.o/.6-oI

4

ICDQ000020080021

WATE:R LOAD 01'/ HORIZONTAL GIRDeRS

OPERATING STRUT THRUST & ANCHORAG[ PULL GIRDER G/-GATe CLOSING

N/I"

ImiIII'JUI.1.~: -' ..... =""''-'''''-II+-;:::.=: ;ff.

_"'-".c'2:J;oe,'-'''''''2!!!.....j.j.;...i '-' "'-m".,,..dOW

OOWNSTRAM LVAnoN

21'4 .!O'.K1/"

, ,

: . {~ ~ , I ~~

as;.. c-s. ".-,;w FJNI snt~: ",0","""""""," ''''.-'''''' .... f.I.-~:; ::: ::: ..Q,.,'''''''.ts-:JH..J~fMI.P&..sbof:,s~#'>dd tw7 It:InsJo" tw$fs. ev. rn 0~J ~C"he4 C, ;,,;J:IThtlko!d' f'lrmIy I h9hfrn~a:t 0-:;t;!;' ~AB6nd,........".,., 4IIjJu #Jd p()lZ.Da!f!2I~ fI'IrII M/PI1'nvIJt 0-:bWJgf'hlll/Hil'1:> tho .-I11NId Iio 1I00F.' 11.,..

-=Itu:i~~~~~~~/c~~J;,9a#wi . 0-nbh'~~;"",.tlI-m.y;'M..::,.::tI::U)';t.o,IIrtn~...,.

(j)-,1"""~AB~dl/~ tJrrdN1.

NOTes:

COMBINED STRCSSC3 IN SKIN PLATt:

TYPIC'.AL HORIZONTAL GIRDER SECTION TYPICAL SKIN Il PANE.L Far ~)I: n. ~ttYq dve ,., ,;'-.161" ..cllon .~fr>HwV

ICDQ000020080021 II

A rodZ ondpobss S 6426 29 *.I5ss- 6

.~9 .~zs-ows 6,ss&,*e~ 6S~YJ6I6--1462 ----O -35 --- -p 4

I,

(5

. , IC6. 3 . -- - .1f~dfrosfts

Co/sos - AWiofdm ,CAw

- -- -- :~ 50'71"

Vs--

":5. FI* D "I: -s4m6fro 5: t-6'*. . 54 -1 odl doo

"" TY'PICAL SECTFION " -- s~/n/44iN=

fO os r605 ec~~ln

lAttachmentB

.J.: :..............I

St, 6,4,35,197555

,.mo-o--.----- -~os i~r ' -- -----

POWNSTEA ELE~r0 TIo ..f --- ---..-----

A&M tr : .; ' ' - " I J.; 465146 S : . . T 60 67 ..

" " .. =, . . "t ...... 5."sfq, ,6B..d.,, bl" . :',

bif.

0" .,

O. .... . ...

.L .'

A-83k, .f..Ek,8 .,o l 'A(,-,

,. SPA .V EEE: DA..M .. : L. .'

" p" n po E 55 "46"56-i cfd iop t ' -o o" "-6 5' o

'LIECTIO IN A ND SECTION.

D O W N R SPA LE . ., .. .. .I . " .PLAN " . . .:. " . .w ~ ,.z'- *.- --""i .oEv SPAN, -W" E- .. DA.

DOWNSTrEA ELEVAT:ION , " " :7070- .............. .62. - ,PAI . 6,.....65.60 .,20.6.6.. . . . -.. , -2. . ... 67.

_

.5 25. : . . . : : .. . . , .,.. .. .

22 0 i32''-

. , . . . ..... . . . .:: '.." r .:"".:'- j-:'.::::'...::,.,-,Um

8o0

. ~*. K-'.

- .~- ~ ~ '..s .... s.j.. -.. ~.. - -' .~0~0525S.56 ~

''5'.~ ..- '-r

::.:

:.";" . -: '" .. / -',',;" 'I"

~~'-'-~'--:-~-'--'---~-~-'--:::"--":'-~+-c-,,-":-'--'---,--'-'-'-':-~---'-,-:-;--~-":-'R ~,~ E 'T~, ,,'30 n ~ .. ~---'----'-'-~~--"'~~--'-'-':"""":''-'-~~~~-7'----'---".'P>'''f,

':.,':'

.1 f: i

7-~!~t4;;':';, ':-"1' .

---;--=--.... 1 - ,-

f~Mj - ..... ,...

" ,~~~i~~:;?;;~,S" ' or, :.-" .:.~ ... --

......

PLAN ONE ~~AN. : . ,~.; ... :. -~" ~ "f ....

';""~:,,!Fe;fl ',",.'

.~ :"

if' 'if~

if - -if 'if-if- '/:'.....f ...

'if -.ifpif: ,if "hifif,-:,- -.... fif,, - - ifififif

........

-

CifDQ 0 0 0i02 0 0 8f00 2 1 f-i i 'h m e n B 8

...... i......f '

if if-ifif-i,''-;.

i . ,:.i..

if if,% -

if. 'if

if ' - FIOIJRr

- 555)5

//,94

-LA 1NO -Pr

LAN 'O-PIll fl-if "if ... 'if f if ' . ... f:a ...if : . : .. .

TANED"Of CrE S Z I.l- - itInw..

..

,

al.'if

A64N OF THE-XDIFFUSE'R SIL.L 0 i f S . 5

"' i ,. .. ' "-"Id . , .- " DATA' USED INif f 0/1 falIi~~f TECH{NICAL, MEMO. NO.407

'Spt e/dd Nazi.e'l.- or (lop .''Fl CLLUM~r O. OCT.-15.1934.

I WHEELER DAII-if I Mn I(RH. E~ L''~'~ SCALEI -RATIO 1 TO OUP-sTREAm ELEY. OF COETAILSSOI' MODEL OAM, TAIRTER SATE

- ----- o~k Cane rosDIFFUSER sits. CREST, APRON-AND SILL MCOEL CINESICRS,.-A-n 0 if . ,:i ..ifa - - "

if. SID LE OF HE S I:. a- .. H': 1 ' . '"'. -, . . " .. 'D FF SE ; .", if. . ' - ,t - . ... : ' , "

1ill T.-

if

if if

,-'.' ' : : . . , ' . ' ' " ,- . . . .- . : .4 . ! . ; . .. . - = : . , = - , .i ' " . - . ' ' . . i , .

: . , % . : = [ ?" . 7 ' - ' ; L ' ! + ' .- ,. : " : < ) : " - - ' , - J . 2

i f' if if:' "' : : : " '.% : 2 :: , " ' ' ' ; : : - < :,. ' , . . " " : '. . . .-. ,

. ; , - - - 7 : . .- , , ; ' ! ' :=. b ' .:: ' " ::'. ,: ;:: . S '. - 2 : " '!" :' '

t ' ' .- -': ': !? , -:i..: ' . , . . , :. - ,: -! : '' / , / ': :-. . - "! _:

' L : . , - ! :

if- if: if if

-. ':".:.' ', , ':;..2 .:"-:. if ."5 .:,"...' if

''i:f" - "f ifif.2/Z. if.:';G: '"''' i"f-- .b'.:''." ::,%- -.-

:,"":; .- '. ":,= ...-:" T." -..- :'

IS" if"% :',?""..":,' .if""' '."'-.; if, .;.,. :":-:. ,;..: ,.' .-'"

if if if ...if if if if.--.

ifo ,.:..}: .... -:-.

ICDQ000020080021 I FAttachment 69

"1" , ,I,..... .....

03'-- --- ------------------- .-- --- ------- --- --5------- ---- - - ----

anch

... ..... .. . . .ch i a :- ,

-- ---- --

--------- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I -- dq -- ----- ---- - -o ------. --- - --- - ----- - - -- --- -

1. .-. 3,A.j -, F

:.- ---- - ,--- ---- - - -- ----- 5

C r -r ..-. S l : .. _,& C rG. r s, . .

..' :::; .:. ' """'"'" vi:::'.'..... 4...i" "i~iL ' 't " ". -, .: T ' : " . . " . " :'. ".'-'" . ' . . .. I : :.: ' " 'i " ." i " . '" . ': - : '. ' . . . -i.' d'

'-. " := , : . . .. . - '. . d', '-;ak .

? 3''7-

-. T1.

WOT t GutHer oer -h- eto r-dawy/ mp hfs~jlt. SeeDw# WD u3o

TOSSWA GAT -f10 REESES SOdALE -

0 -W. t R -d

-1EE.O PAAOW.

;fA RI.ISTLLTONSETONL LVAIO,

iEALEABSTES7S.1A IT

. ..... -...... -

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cl f, feretnc f ae

l~cit N-5 A WD~I . IC 505,

SEEE5'ADAL AT I-5

I ' :-Tr-~ ~.- " . "'WE- :. .

I

I.\

I--IT+ . .: -. . . ,,CTI ,NA L ,P.T.-A M-, , L:,,., .. .QN ' : . ' -. .... ..

A~I~I - -~ -.

5E1 B

, . l!

ICDQ000020080021

I I.

.. tt. Chain JPiptt sleeves _ ''.6-1onq.---- .

, i:' Ii.. Chain; .. __ ~ I I

,,50.j8+- ..... -.-~:.--....-..---.. ,-.-38'.8' .... ................. - .... '-....... : ... - ......... _ ........... .

. ";;

, -----.. ----.------------_.-------- ----------------.-------~---.--.---_t.5 . .-0.---.-------- ______ -' ... __ J ___ -:- ______ '-_____________ __ ._;

, :. ~. '

\., I'

./ . \.

. "" C

IAttachment 89

d~Oi!, Gulter over" sheaves of roadway / expansion joInts. 56e Owg WD "30 .

. / ~-{. Roadway i 1"1.568.0

',I!1./I./'i.

F/I'IA.(..F1IfLl1 ~V-. ~-.T1

.' 3-/6-37 R ~-Z5

::":::"., 0"

f ~ :" t.J .. ,"-:.; .. ;;~;::;~4~~~~:':';::;::';;;;;;:;' ~W:;,;;i-I:;;E;;;iE:::;Li'E:r-R",':.;' ",DAM .~;:..~:: 0',

./

ICDQ000020080021 I lAttachmen l

.I iSI A ..ps,,d bERP-ioqfnished by lhe AuFh-hNIyL .. ..Hlt=evsodbgiPART SECTION 0-0

--p--- -- . ... ..

L 41 3S 4~I02

-, . " 3 po oe. . 0 .. . ... .

. -7.,: . - 7 " - ------ :: : .. , : .. " :

:. - . .:. . : , , . ,, . . .: , . :. : . . .. ,

IAttachment B10 I

F odA tpsphm Me4*ETA JL , 4 As $# vAi Ip ,4N ,

...... . .. .. ..... ....... . !._..... ... .... . .. ..... .. ... ......................... .. :..::.

......... 2 {

250. , : " " .. :,,, 65,,

H aEI

ISSRI.R, -------------------

a - :j A-: : - .. A... -.. 20-7 .? . - . = :=: : : . 11:. . .. . - . ;.

-' :- "-" ; . ".:2 .. L::" -.5= 120p 232 L2"3( ' . I'"' .. ".. .' ..S:.' :,5210'2:: . ..

LIST OF ORAGENERAL INSrALLATION-SECTIROA

. ~~GENERAL -ASTLLAT-N- LAN A.-AT-E y - S -AFT AD UFrJ

I RURAAR0 sEAL A__- VENT PIPE Asee TVA l Nw 51 N4501-.-'- 'R0510 SAIL AM M L -PEALS -S1

REFERENCE OF

s TRASHWAY-pLA- TPOIRS AND

E l1" SOUT NOTEG5rde splice. For .ores lidt of- poRs, se

El 5 0- A., -h. -d55000 .It,

SPECIAL -IOF - . .. f9Ad ap1 . .11t0hdu O

1.503

qs4my LA370 TAI1

EdIN SeLATOnSC

- -- - --- ... . ..

.... W~t -LE Y n ,

WHEELE

fm- C, 317.S'x 6' TRASHWAf~l~hw~yD- GENVERAL INSTALLATION-SEC

SAWINGSS-T eZ...-..sl 0-- . ............ MISMI

ee ODw. 232-0-735 -

RER0-9 - A.nm Adi-t-Wn

AWINGS

NG PIII . ............ . .] D R ~n .... l -11 . -..

TRL ........ 1]-o 131

---------- 7 -- - - --

,, e2. - :- ----- ."--.-- .- : :'20 10.. 33f. -...P .,IPR:::--::::z ::1:.;

PART SECTION D-o 1j NOTERe-1in*e oF =eioOD fh m A Below EI40.00 the haistinq mechanism iie hs shEnbnc- o ejmvtifi.. , S ECT ION C -C qle is fhe so- as Ar Dadif Woes..adial yote hoisfinq mech.,Iismp.

.

rIsAUTHRITy

DAMY GATE

IONAL. ELEVATIONSSE(CTION AC A

-u1e.uS -- S EES ---- .4

. .... 1 .......... I.T

i~7Z9~S'T,~ lAPS

J ft. 1ze-z-4,

ICDQ000020080021

----Hoist sheaves and beQrinqs furnillMd by fhe Authority I

i . ~ i I L~!'C-l 'f.!I:L.?,~o:J -(()lrl"rm:fik1jolt1t

DETAIL A&A/ PART SECTION D-D SDtJfh TrrI3hJtltlj ~"lZ ~s~!~:~r{ Trashwoy FOR "::::~~:'::HS;:~':;,:;' ==_.

----.~--------~--I''' -

. --IJ(7"Afl A G' --07. / AI __________ .l::f~sf_f~!!!!:P.. _______________ d ___ "':\ ____________________ _______________________________ _

PART SE.CTlON D-D RetrDinrrr qf Secfi(X1 OD is th same as shawn in ~fjDnaf elevation of ra.dial gofe hoistinq mecJranism.

REVISIONS BY TVA.

~J A

ScCT/ONC-C &Iaw ElSJIOfJO t/lt :I~l:n~ medJanism for frashway

qcrl~ is ~ht: $D"!t! os for, radial qafes.

IAttachment 810

1I ST OF DRAWINGS 37.5' >:6' TRASHWA" GAT

GE:/Il'RAL. INSTALLA rICH - SCTIONAI,. ELEVATIONS._.ZlZ -0' 719 GENERAL INSTAL1.ATION - PLAN AND 5C710N5._ . _232 -0-7]0 GATE ASSEMat.V-SHAFTANO U.TJNG PIN . _ ........ UZ-O-7J'

-,....------. ~:~ ~'u~6~~~~_.~_~~.~_~~~~~~~~~~_~~~~'~~~~:::._=~~~~g :~~~ GUARD - SEAL 80X- VENT PIPE AND GRILL . __ ZU-O- 714

COR~ER S,IU. AS.!iEMBL.V -SAU-LJSTO/CPARTS . _ ..2'JZO -735

REFERENCE DRAWINGS RADIAL. AND TRASHWAY GATE HaIST

ASSEMBLY - LIST OF PARTS ..... _ .. ___ 132-0-736 TRASHWAV-PLANELVAT/ON AND Se'CTlONS . _ llZO.J!j4 SOUTH TRASJ.fWAV-CONCRETt OU7UNE _ _ __ JIN4l0/

NOTE F"r)r m:rlu and list of poris. see Dwq.23Z0-735

SPECIAL NOTE Add 0.1' 10 all f!/~Yr1Ii(Jrl$ shown for COfIllenion from f91Z datum to I'M dotum of 19Z9 Generul Adjusfmenf.

OHOPKINS ON FLEXIBLE BULKHEADS

*ACDQ00C020080021

AMERICAN S

I~tcment Bll1

OCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERSFounded November 5. 1852

TRANSACTIONS

402

3. Free earth-support analyses which compensate for toe fixity by includ-ing a bending moment reduction factor are liable to be misleading; fixed earth

support methods should always be used.4. Design analyses should be suitable for practical design use. In view of

the approximations involved in "idealizing" geologic sections and assessing

soil properties, design computations should not dependl on arithmetical accu-

racy to several decimal places.Paper No. 2677 \J4. t l-

RATING CURVES FOR FLOW OVERDRUM GATES

By JOsEPH N. BRADLEY,, A. M. ASCE

WITH DiSCUSSION BY MESSRS. GuiDo WYSS; SAM SHULITS; Bon BUEHLERIF. B. CAMPBELL AND A. A. MCCooL; AND JOSEaP N. BRADLEY

SYNopsis

With water becoming more valuable in the western states each year, there isan increasing demand for better methods of measurement and additionalrating structures. This condition applies not only to the requirements formain canals and laterals of irrigation works but also to the regulation andmeasurement of flow at dams. In fact, the need has reached the point atwhich operators are desirous of metering the flow at nearly all control devicesin irrigation systems, and in other water supply or control systems.

The primary purpose of this paper is to point out that there are numerouscontrol structures in existence that will serve a dualpurpose-that of a meteringstation as well as that of a regulating device. Examples of such structures in-clude spillways, with or without gates; outlet works for dams using gates orvalves; and canal regulating structures using gates. With the accumulationof information from hydraulic model studies made by the Bureau of Reclama-tion (USBR), United States Department of the Interior, it is now possible toprepare reasonably accurate rating curves for many such structures withoutthe construction of models and without access to the prototypes. The methodis especially useful for the rating of existing structures. This paper describesthe method as it applies to the rating of drum gates and the paper is concludedwith an engineering example. The method is also applicable to the rating ofthe Volet gate used in France, the bascule gate manufactured in the UnitedStates, and others in which the sector of a circle is hinged at or near the crestof a spillway.

N'o~e.--Published, essentilaly as printed here. in February.' 1953, an Proceedingis-Separate No. 169O.Positions and titles given are those in effect when the paper or discussion was received for publication.

I Hydr. Engr.. Bureau of Reclamation, U. S. Dept. of the Interior, Denver; Colo.403

402 HOPKINS ON FLEXIBLE BULKHEADS

. _. which compensate for toe fixity by includ-3. Free earth support analyses r lito be misleading' fixed earth

ing a bending moment reduction factor are 1(l.) e'

support m~thodSa~h~:Sl~ha~~~Y~eb:ui::~ie for pr(\cticn.l design usc. In view, of 4. DesIgn an Y . ""d l" " eologic sections I\l1d asscssmg

. . . 1 'ed mIen lzmg g the approxl.matJOn~ lIlVO' t t: should not

404 DRUM GATES DRIqM nA n,o

INTRODUCTIONThe drum gate is a type of gate that floats in a chamber and is buoyed into

position by regulating the water level in that chamber. A medium-sized gateof this type is shown in Fig. 1. To use drum gates as metering devices, it isessential that each gate be equipped with an accurate position indicator.This indicator may consist of an arm or pointer connected directly to one ofthe gate pins, and is usually located inside an adjacent pier. The scale, whichcommonly indicates "position of high point of gate," may be a cast-mctal arcmounted on the wall under the pointer, or a scale painted on the wall.

This paper presents a method of computing rating curves for all positionsof the gate with an accuracy comparable to that which can be obtained froman average current-meter traverse of the river. The information required forrating a drum gate consists of the over-all dimensions of the gate and overflowcrest, the information contained in this paper, and the coefficient of discharge

... .... 405see-It, is questionable. Measurement of the flowover the drum gates, which isnow possible, would have afforded a continuous record and one that would beas accurate for floods as for normal flows.

CHARAC'rER1sTICS OF TIHE Diuht GA'rEAs a measuring device, the drum gate resembles a sharp-crested weir witha cIurvCd upstream face over the greater part of its travel. With an adequatepositioning indicator, the drum gate can serve as a very satisfactory meteringdevice.When the drum gate simulates a sharp-crested weir-that is, when a linedrawn tangent to the downstream lip of the gate makes a positive angle withthe horizontal, as in Fig. 2(a), four principal factors are involved. These factorsare 1H, the total head above the high point of the gate; 0, the angle made by aline drawn tangent to the downstream lip of the gate and the horizontal; r,the radius of the gate or an equivalent radius, should the curvature of the

Hfigh, Pointha o Gate +0

+ 6 .

(a) POSITIVE ANGLE, a (6) NEGATIVE ANGLE, 0 (c) CONTROL PoINrI'mo. 2 ,-DRUM-GATE POSITIONS

gate involve a parabola; and C,, the coefficient of discharge in Q = C, L If,in which Q is the discharge in second-feet, and L is the length of the gate.. The depth of approach was not included as a variable because drum-gateinstallations studied were for medium and high dams at which approach effectswere negligible. When the approach depth, measured below the high pointof tihe gate, is equal to or greater than twice the head on the gate, it has beenshown' that a further increase in approach depth produces very little increasein the coefficient of discharge. Most drum-gate installations satisfy thiscondition, especially when the gate is in a raised position. Therefore, withadequate approach depth the four variables 11, 0, r, and C, completely definethe flow over this type of gate for positive angles of 0, Fig. 2(a).For negative values of 0, Fig. 2(b), the downstream lip of the gate no longercontrols the flow. Rather, the control point shifts upstream to the vicinityof the high point, of the gate for each getting as illustrated in Fig. 2 (c), andflow conditions gradually approach those of the free crest (as the gate islowered). Although other factors enter the problem, the similitude also holdsfor this case down to an angle of approximately -150.

'"Studiea of Crests for Overfall Dan.q," Bulletin No. 3 Pt. Vi, Bo'icr Canyon Final Report, Burea,of Reclamation, U. S. DeIpt. of the Interior, Denver, Colo., 1948.I

Fio. l.-Daum GATE, 100 FT BY 16 FT. AT IfoovEn DAM (ARIZONA-NEVADA)

for any appreciable head on the spillway with the gate in the completely loweredposition. Should the coefficient data be lacking, the coefficient of dischargefor the designed head can be estimated for nearly any overflow section by amethod previously published.2

The method of rating described here is not intended to replace the mea-surements taken at river gaging stations. However, it has tile followingadvantages: (1) The gates can be set in a few minutes to pass a desired dis-charge and (2) in time of flood, the gaging station may be out of order but thegate calibration is as accurate as usual. The flood that passed over GrandCoulee Dam (Washington) in 1948 is an example. The river gage, in the pierof a bridge downstream, was in error because of a drawdown in the watersurface, adjacent to the pier, at the higher flows. Current-meter measurementswere also attempted during the flood, but the swiftness of the current andother difficulties rendered these only partially successful. As a result, thedischarge at the peak of. the flood, which was finally estimated as 638,000

";'Dischal iefficients for Irregular Overfall Spiliway Sections," by J. N. Bradlcy, E.nineerinoMonograph NABureau of Reclamation, U. 5. Dept. of the Interior, Denver, Colo., March, 1952.

404 DRUM. GATES

INTRODUCTION

The drum gate is a type of gate that floats in a chamber and is buoyed into position by regulating the water level in that chamber. A medium-sized gate of this type is shown in Fig. 1. To use drum gates as metering devices, it is essential that each gate be equipped with an accul'llte position indicator. This indicator may consist of an arm or pointer connected directly to OlJe of the gate pins, and is usually located inside an adjacent pier. The scale, which commonly indicates "position of high p01nt of gate," lllay be a cast-llIetal arc mounted on the wall under the pointer, or a scale painted on the wall.

This paper presents a method of computing rating curves for all positions of the gate with an accuracy comparable to that which can be obtained from an average current-meter traverse of the river. The information reql.ired for rating a drum gate consists oUhe over-all dimensions of the gate and o~'erilolV crest, the information contained in this paper, and the coellicient of discharge

FlO. i.-DRm& GATE. 100 FT BY 16 FT. AT HOOHR DA" (ARIZO"A-NEVADA)

for any appreciable head on the spillway with the gate in the completely lowered position. Should the coefficient data be lacking, the coefficient of discharge for the designed head can be estimated for nearly any overflow section by a method previously published.2 .

The method of rating described here is not intended to replace the mea-sureinents taken at river gaging stations. However, it hns the following

ad~antages: (1) .The gates can be set in a few minutes to pass a desired dis-charge and (2) in time of flood, the gaging station may be out of order but the gate calibration is as accurate as usual. The flood that passed over Grand (Joulee Dam (Washington) in 1948 is an example. The river gage, in the pier of a bridge downstream, was in error because ofa drawdown in the water surface, adjacent to the pier; at the higher flows. Current-meter measurements were also attempted during the flood, but the swiftness of the current and other difficulties rendered these only partially successful. As a result, the discharge at the peak of. the flood, which was finally estimated as 638,000

. ;'Disc~mclents lor Irregular OverraU Spillway Seetions." by J. N. Bradley, Enui"et:ring MfJ7W(1TIJph ~ Ul'OIlU of Reclamation, U. S. Dept. of the Inrerior, Denver, Colo . March, 1\l52.

DRUM OA1'ES 4f15 sec-ft, is questionable. Mensurem Ilt . f tI . now possible would have alfor I leo .Ie flow over the drulJl gates, which is as accurate f~r fl d f t e( a contllllloliS record alld one thllt would he 00 s as or normal flows.

CUARAC'rERlSl'lCS OF THE DIIU!f GATE

As a lIlenslll'illg device the drum rate I' II n c~l1~ved upstream fllce o:er the rrell~er I cRem., es a ~hnrp-c~ested weir with pOSitIOning indicator the drum g t llirt of Its trn\el. "Ith an adequate device, ' go. e can serve as a very satisfactory metering

When the drum gate simUlates I . drawll tangent to the dowIlstream I~ so~a~r.-crested weIr-that. i~, when Il line the horizontal, as in Fig. 2(a) fou P. I; gate ma~es n POSItive angle with ure II, the total head above t'l IrprI1nc1!>a :lfctors nre ll1yolved. Tllese fnctors . Ie IIg 1 pOlllt 0 the gate' e tI I d hue drawll tangent to the downstream Ii f tI "Ie !lng e ~a e by /l

the radius of the gate or an equi I t P d~ lC gnte and the horizontal; r, . va en rn ms, should tIle cun-uture of the

(6/ NEGATIVE ANGLE, , (e/ CONTROL POINT 1,'10. 2.-l)nIJAI-GATE P~'ITION8

?nte i.nvolv.e a pn~nbol:l; a~d Cq, the coefficient of dischar e in Q = I In wluch Q IS the thsehnrgc In second-feet, and L is the len t~ of tl C q L II , . The depth of. approach was not included . g Ie gate.

installations studied \vere for medium d I' t~ a vlmable because drum-gate were negligible When tl I a~ ug I :lms at which approach effects . of the gate, is ~qual to or ~:e:~:;~~C 1 t e~th, mensured below' the high point 8hown3 that a further increase i Ian w:c~ the head on the gate, it has been in the coefficient of discharge n a~.r0;cdl epth pr~duces v~ry little incrense condition, especially when the . ate fss in rum:gate m~t.allatlOns satisfy this adequate approach depth the fo~r variabl~ ~~IS;d posItIon. ThereCore, with the flow over this type of gate for p 't' I" T, an~ Ct completely define

F .. .. OSI Ive ang es of e FIg 2(a) 'or negat1ve valu f (J F' , . . controls the flow. ;:to ., '1g. 2(b), thed?wnst~eam lip of the gate no longer

. of the high point of th:;~t!170::~!~~:t~~:t slllf.~~ upstren~ to. tbe vicinity flow conditions gradually approach th os gf tahs I custrated III FIg. 2(c), and I d) . e 0 e ree crest (as th t, f~;:~~s ~1l8~~:nugth other Ca1c.torCsenter ~he problem, the similitude ~8!~;1~:

o an ang.e o approXimately 150. ... . .. "~S~u()i"" of Cmst., (or OverfAil DRill ... B dl . N .

o( Reclall1Btion. U. S.Dcpt. of the Inten;;r. Den~;~, c':,i:', 1;~4X.I, Doultler Canyon I'inal Rcporto, Duro."

406 DRUM GATES

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

The data for this drum-gate study were obtained from hydraulic models ofvarious sizes and scales, The experiments were performed over a period ofabout eighteen years. The spillway drum gates tested, the principal dImen-sions of each, the model scale, the laboratory where the tests were condclted,and other information are given in Table 1. Gates for the first three dams

TABLE 1.-PHiNcOipA DxmI OsNSs oF DRUMt GATES TESTED

0 0DRUM OATE8

azin, in h is clsstical experiments, studied inclined sharp-crested wveirs.oTle angle of the weir was varied in increments from 140 to 900 withltle hori-zontal, and each weir was 3.7 ft high (vertical dimension). The head on thecrest of the weirs ranged from 0.32 ftto 1.4S ft. The results, presented in Fig. 4,show 0 plotted ngainst the Bazin coelficient, Ca (in the formula, Q = C6 L h

-gh), in which hldoes not include the velocity head of approach (h,). The

w er Surface El 1024.00"- fCresl (Gale Raised) El 1020:00

Grand Coulee(Washington)Bhakra(India)Shasta(California)Hamilton(Texas)Hoover Shae

4-M53(Ariz.-Nev.)Hoover. Shape

8-M56(Ajiz,-Nev.)Hoc7er. Shape7-C4b(Ari2.-Nev.)Friant(Californa)lsNorris(Tennessee)Madden(Canal %one)Capilano(British Columbia) I

1123

4

4

43341

135135110300

100

100

10010010010070

I28282828

66.25

66.25

67.2574.17

. 16

1618

141823

26.8

36.0

28.0

47.0

34.0

30.0

71.0

360

410

460

50

50

50

50

1*50

200

120

200

31.65

2828

32

26.6

1:301:801:081:30

1:20

20.6

26.13

16.027.0

30.023.0

1:20 1 Montrose

1:60

1:25

1:72

1:72

1:60

Vort Collins(Colo.)Customnhuse(Denver. Colo.)CustomhouseFort Collins

Montrose, Colo.

Fort Collins

Fort Collins

Fort Collins

Fort Collins'Denver Federal Center

0 10 20 Axis of CreslL_..L_._jScale,iin Feet

(c) NORRIS DAM IO0-FT BY 14-rT DRUM GATE Maximum Waler SurfaceCresl (Gate Raisedl El 570.00'

Maximum Water Surface El 1047.00 .

.. Gate down. b Refers to the shape of the spillway cross section.

listed in the table-Grand Coulee Dam (Washington), B3hakra Danm (India),and Shasta Dam (California)-s.re identical except for the length and ntumbher.The models of each were tested at different times by different personnel. Theresults of the tests are nearly identical, which fact indicates the consistencypossible in this type of test. Although identical gates are of value in indi-eating the consistency of results, test results on dissimilar gates are desirablebecause they can give assurance that all factors involved in the establishmentof similitude have been considered. The study includes only eleven gates(Table 1), but the dimensions of these vary over a fairly wide range, and theconsistency indicated in compiling the results was quite satisfactory.

Cross sections of representative examples of the spillway overflow sectionsand drum gates listed in. Table I are shown in Fig. 3. For Hoover Dam,Shape 4-M3 is shown. The data relating the coefficient, C,, to the head forthe model .drum gates tested are tabulated in Table 2.

RRsuLTS oF BAZIN ON STRAIGHT INCLINED WEIRSThe straight inclined weir is comparable to a drum gate, having infinite

radius, thusthe results of Bazin serve as an introduction to this study.

-i 1.50so Ft.

Fra. 3 .- ExAMrLtS OP Diaum-GAEr CRoss SECTIONS

angle 0 is also plotted with respect to Cq' (in the expression, Q =9, L HI) inwhich 11 is tile total head. This latter expression wilt be used throughoutthe paper.

By reference to Fig. 4 it can be observed (1) that the coefficient, Co, variesonly slightly with tIle observed head on the Weir, (2) that there is a rather

"RtecentExperiments on the Flow of water over Weirsb nasin dAOctober, 1888. (Translation by Arthur H oer eir. " ., bnClub of Philadelphia, Va Vol .X No. 4, 1892, 316.) T.rautsa.e. Jr., Proceedings, Engineers'

406 DRUM OATES

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

The data for this drum-gate study were obtained from hydraulic modcls of various sizes and scales. The experiments were pcrformed over a period of about eighteen years. The spillway drum gates tested, the princii)!ll dimen-sions of each, the model scale, the laboratory where the tcsts were conducted, and other information a.re given in Table 1. Gates for the first threc dllnlA

TABLE i.-PRINCIPAL DIMENSIONS OF DRUM GATES TESTED

'!lIn,; No. of Length Height Radius Approl\Ch UlUIlI Model "~draulie Dam gates of pte, of pte, of gate, dept", hend on scale In oratory in (t in,ft In It in it trest,"

in It ---------------Grand Coulee

1 :30 Vort Collins

(Washington) 11 135 28 66.25 3GO 31.(;5 (Colo.) Bhakra Cu~tolnll()uso (India) 2 135 28 Shasta

66.25 410 28 1:80 (Denver, Colo.) (California) 3 110 28 66.25 400 28 I:G8 CustomhOUff8 Hamiltoo llexaa) 1 300 28 74,l7 50 32 1:30 Fort Collins

oover ~ Shape 4M3 (Ariz.Nev.) 100 16 26.8 50 26.6 1 :20 !lIontros., Colo. Hoover, Shape 8-M5' (Ariz.Nev.)

Hoover, Shape 7-C4&

4 100 16 36.0 50 26.6 1:20 ~Jontrose

(Ari -Nev.) Friaht

100 16 26.0 50 26.6 1:60 Fort Collin..

(California) 3 100 18 41.0 110 10.0 1:25 Fort Collins Norris " (Tennessee> Maddeo'

3 100 14 34.0 200 27.0 1 :72 Fort Collins (Canal Zone) 4 100 18 30.0 120 30.0 1 :72 l'ort Collins' Capilano (British Co\uwbia) 1 70 23 71.0 200 23.0 1 :60 Denver Federal Center

" G .. te down. Refers to the shape of the spillway crOss section.

listed in the table-Grand Coulee Dam (Washingtoll), I31wkm Dalll (India), and Shasta Dam (California)-are identical except. for the length and Humher. The models of each were tested at different times by different personnel. The results of the tests are neatly identical, which fact. indicates thc consistency possible in this type of test. Although identical gates are of value in indi-eating the consi8tency of results, test results on dis!limilar gates are desirablc because they can give assurance that aU factors involved in the establishment of similitude have been considered. The study includes only eleven glttes

(Tabl~ 1), but the dimensions of these vary Qver 1\ fairly wide range, and the consistency indicated in compiling the results was quite satisfactory,

Cross sections of representative examples of the spillway overflow sections and drum, gates listed in Table 1 are shown in Fig. a, For Hoover Dltm, Shape 4-M3 is shown. The data. relating the coefficient, Cf , to the hend (or the model.drum gates tested are tabulated in Table 2.

. RESULTS OF BAZIN ON STRAIGHT INCLINED WEIRS

The straight inclined weir is comparable to n. drum gate, having infinite radius, thus the results of Bazin serve as an introduction to this study,

.jUi 13 . . I'

The film;, IrI liS cln.ssicnl expcrimcnts, studied inclined sharp-crested \\'cirs' !;Il~ e of the WClf was varied ill illcrclllellts from 14 to 90 with 11 h : zontn, ano cnch weir was 3.7 It high (I'c/,tical dimension) Th I Ie orl-crest of the weirs r:lllgctl from 0 3'> ftto 1 ,'s f< TJ . It' e lea~1 on the I 0 I . . - ..... Ie resu s presented 1I1 Fig 4 s I~ I> ottcd aglllllst the Bnzin eoel/icicllt C (I'n tl f' 1 " , ..f '/, I.)' I' I ' , 6 Ie ormu a Q = C L h

g ! , III W lie I Ii docs not iI/elude the velocity hend of npproa~h (ho), 6 'l'he

(Maximum Wale, Surface I 1024.00 --:::....--- Cresl (Gale Raised) EI 1020:00

...

la) HAMILTON DAM' 300FT BY 28fT

DRUM GATE

o 10 20 L I , Stale.in reel

(e) NORRis OAM loon BY 14fT DRUM GATE (Maximum Water Surtace Ei 1047.00

Crest (G.te Raised) EI 1034.0

'.-,

:.6 .: . . '.

E1482.Sp

,Maximum Wale, Surface EI 1232.00

(b) HOOVER DAM 100fT BY 16FT

DRUM GATE

(d) CAPItANO DAM =="d-,.......- 70H BY 23Ft

DRUM GATE

Fta. 3.-E:u.\lru:a 01' DaUlt-GAr>; CJlOB8 SCTt~'"

:~1~~1 81;s i:l~~ Pltottteld 1 Wit~1 resp~ct to C " (in the expression, Q, = C r L HI) in . tlJe paper. Ie 0 It letl(. ThIS latter expression will be used throughout

By reference to Fig, 4 it can be observed (1) th I only slightly witb the obsen'ed head on the n;ei/t(;)letlelaOteffithClent: C" v8

trhies

" . ' , ere IS a ra er o t be Itccc .. t Experiments un the FlolV ol'WBter over W " b' ' Cl"ui: of'I.fli~e1 (Transplation by Arthur lIt.richal and ~~'t;. cr.~. BU~Z1'.' A"Jnal'p~ de. P"!'ta nCh"!,"aI ,

phi .. , s., Vol. IX, No.4, 1892, p.316./' ra wIne. r., rcud.nq., Eng",,,,,,"'

408 DRUM GATES DtUMl GATES'409

TABLE 2.-DitJm-GATr COEPFFICIENTS,

Gn&axv Couitza DAM BnAKXA DAM SiIASTA DAU HIAMILTON DAM(W ae ingto n) (India) (California) (Texas.)

Reservoir Coeli. Reservoir CoefO- Reservoir CoelS- Total head Coeffi-elevation, Ien.,e elevation et. elevation, cient, on gate. | ict.in feet C, in feet Cc in feet C, in feet co

GATE ELEVATION6 1260.0 GATE ELEVATION' 1552.0 IGATr ELEVATION6 1037.0 GATE ELEVAM90.0 992.01295 - .2 50 -3.W8 [0175 d..895 - 35 3.7101290 3.842 1575 3.645 1070 3.835 30 3.f,51285 3.745 1670 3.550 10(15 3.760 25 3.5801280 3.635 1565 3.420 1300 3.;75 20 3.5001275 3.510 .1560 3.275 1055 3.575 15 3.4001270 3.352 1555 3.120 1050 3,465 10 3.2901265 3.220 ' 1045 3.335 5 3.150

GAm EL~v.Ioe 1263.81 GATE ELEVATION 1557.0 JGATELV+eATtON 1F39r.0 CAT ELEVATION 1195.521295 3.50 18 3.430 075, 3.037 31) 3.10131290 3.442 1575 3.380 1070 3.565 25 3.3101285 3.360 1170 3.295 1065 3.490 20 3.2231280 3.280 1565 3.170 1060 3.417 15 3.1501275 3.220 1550 3.040 *. 1055 3.340 10 3.0851270 3.182 1 1050 3.250 5 3.010

GATE RLEVATION. 1267.02 {GAT ILEVATIOm 1803.0 ATPF 1 Av..TIOVN 1041-.0 1ATh EIEVAION 9019.01295 3.530 1580 3:550 I 05 3.550 25 3.4501290 3.457 1676 3.356 . 1070 5 3.404 20 3.3!N01285 3.380 1572 3.290 2006 3.432 15 3.3001280 3.300 1568 3.345 10069 3,365 10 3.1951275 3.213 1564 3.465 1055 3,290 5 3.0801'2'70 ". 3J120

GATE ELa8VAToN 1270.48 bATE ELEVATo.1 1567.0 1GATRE. LEYATON 1045.0 (lATF ELV.VATIO, 100(0.3295 3.600 1550 3.005 - 107, - 3.037 is1 3.6101290 3.530 1577 8.50 " 1070 3.565 15 3,'1M5I185 3.462 1573 3.600 1005 3.490 12 36051280 3.410 1570 8535 1060 3.415 0 3.5601275 3.375 " 056 3.330 6 3.505

1050 3.220GA.TE EucvATioie 1274.01 Gia~r ELEVATION 1572.0 JGATr EL.EVATION 1050.0~ GATE ELEVATION 1013.0

1300 1 3.725 1880 3.780 1 1075 1 3.717 102 3.7181325 .. 695 1579 3.758 1070 I 3.0670 1 3.6.01290 3.862 1.78 3690 1065 3.615 8 3.6451285 3.630 1577 .3.500 1060 3.560 6 3.5951280 3.600 1570 -3150 1055 3.495 4 4 3.5-30GATE ELEVATION 1277.50w

__________ G.EELEVATION 1055.0 GATE ELEVATION 1020.01295 .3.75 T 1078 3.854 - 6 3.01290 3.738 1070 3.827 5 3.6101285 3.740 1065 3.800 4 3.5401280 3.765 10(60 3.780 3.5 3,400

__________ _________1055 3.7613 _________

GA.T ELEvATIor 1281.021 _GATELEVATION 1060.0

1295 .7 1075 3.6451292 3.708 1072 3.6831288 8.705 1069 3.7401285 " 3.725 1066 3.815

1063 3.020

G&T ELEVATIoN. 1284.50j _

_GA.ELEVATION 1065.011800 34 I I3 107 3.8101298 3830 '-1074 3.8651292 I 3.875 1072 3.9101288 3.950 1070 3.050

GATE ELEVAT1oN 1288.01296 3:7'01294 3.7201292 3.6701280 3.580

o0rdinates of curves prepared by plotting original dats. 6 Gate down.

TA -LE 2.-(oontinued)

FurAN7DA r Nni DAM(California) I ons DAt - AOD DAuI CAPILANO DAM

7---- oi (Tenne- (Canal Zone) (British Columbia)-: - ir ------ ------- ---- -elevation e dent, elevation. oe'ee, rontlaea/ e efl- l~eervaon irelerivoir Cie t CoeW. Total head Coe i n Reev Coe'in feet Cc in feet C. I * i e. c, e t ile t ie

GATE ELEVATIONS 860.0 E 10200 ' AT E . . .. 23212GATE ELEVATION 2.0 GATe ELEVATItoi 547.0

580 1 3.6250 105t, 1 3-W15 35 1 3911100 8 .771 3.25 4 1050 I 3.845 30 1 3770 1 "50 1 3.7053.460 105 f 3.70 25 1 .6 . 570 173.05571 I 3'34 1040 3.670 7 20 3.560 5650 3.5

50 8 1 3. 475 1035 1 3.550 15 3 5 3.2505 3.175 j 1030 3.30 3.4a 50 34153502 2 1025 3. 2 3.250 j5.GATE ELEATON 561.5 GAEEEAIN1022.0 Gr LVTO 3. jGT LVTO 5.

1580 3.3.10 -T 1055 5. 78 1 .1- 385.43.250 1025 . 20 3675 3.4157.1 3.200 100 3...... t 3.590 555 3..68 3.15 & 1 035 3.400 1 3.50 5 3.4250

2.IGATE 5 1C LVATIo 1022.0 GAE "LEVATION 24 GT 52_ 81 2 1025 3.000 3 . 6*0 505 IO3.320

7758 ,, oo1050 I3A 10 ,5 1.0 30 . j 3.9. 0 .. 583...-4 3.280 30025 03 .o 580 . .550.

.I 3.240 " 305 | .7',2,3.7350 . 3.61.

57.1 3'200,. 20 3.67 57 Is, 5

8 3.17 1040 5 3.80

858 138 1035 3:450 1 375 90 3.355

5 5 2.960 1 570 .50374 3.130100 .050008 3,2

GATE ELEVATION 56.0 30200 5 .410 50A T 3.30mo 3 A XmLVTO 0tOGT 3&TIO. 400 GATE ELEVATjON, 508,5587 3.4*321 1055 . 25 3.900 8 . ..

S I 3.40 1 105 l 3.81o I 20 I 3..00 I 58 3.850574 .* 3.240 2 045 3.780 I 5 3. 60 . 577 1 3.8501030 3 . 3,38!.

571 1 3.205 104 I 3.70 10 3.815 54 3.920_63 3,03 5 12 10 35.790

0 5 053 0 37800

27 .060 305 7 3.804337887 .55 1 1045 3.0 3.77 38603:

74 1 3.550 I " 1040 .378445

572 j ..og { lI6/ 3t .

---ATE_ EL VT IO 5. r , 1o~ | '0+ I

oA. JELEVATEEV 672.0 J0GA28.0 ELVAT-O- 100.,

560 3.72510 358 1383501

578 37 2 10501 320017 3. 38 811 204B5.903.8855574 I 3.020 I 3040 3880'

- 1 035 ! 3 ."75 1.5 7.GATUELEVATION 573.0 GATE ELEVATION 1032.0 [------

584o10 3.740 105 U1 38704

578 3.708 1050 3.875 I . 376 ,3.75 3~1045 3.880.575 I 3.780 3 040 I 3.895 "I .574 I 3.000 I 1035 I 3.920 'GATE E LEVTIO N 57 60 G ;ATE ELEVATION 1034.0 I.

880 3.780 -1055I 3.815578 3. , 1050 3.825S 577 3 : .80 7 1045 5 is8.5580

576 4 3.90 s 1040 3.855 I-1036 I 3.945 |'

I " ~Coordinates of curves prepared by plotting orig~inal data. I Gate down.

15 5 3.91. .0 .3.4 1.6

I

408 DRUl'r1 GATES DlIUM GA'n:s

TABLE 2.-DRUM-GATB CO~;FFlClFlNTS' TABLE 2. "-(Continued) GRAND CoOLE!) DAM BU"RitA D".lI SIIASTA D .. >t llAMIL1'O" D ... " (Washington) (India) (California) (Texas)

Reservoir I Coeffi. Resen'oir I Coeffi- Rcsen"oir I Coeffi- Total head I Coclli elevation, cient, elevation, oi.nt, elevation. dent, onl!nw, dent, in feei C. in f~et C. in feet C, in feet C. 1295 3.1120 1580 3.680 liS 3.895 35 3.710 1290 3.842 1675 8.645 WiO 3.8.15 30 :l.tH5

G .. T ELeVATION' 560.0 10 E I ArPJ L"V .. T.o .... 1020.0 OAT" ELEVATION' 232 0 I 0 E

1285 3.745 1670 3.M!) 1005 3.700 25 3.530 1280 3.635 1565 3.420 1000 a.675 20 3 . .';110 1275 3.510 1660 3.275 1055 3.575 15 3.41)0 1270 3.352 15.55 3.120 1050 3.465 10 3.2\){) 1265 3.220 l(l4~ 3.335 5 3.1\\0

GATl!I ELEV/o.TlON 1263.61 10"1'8 EL':V"TION 1657.0 I GATE r.LEV ATU)" 1039.0 I (;,,1''' ELr.VA'tION 1106.52 1295 3.530 1580 3.430 1075. 3.637 30 3.100 1290 3.442 1575 3.380 1070 3.565 25 a.310 1285 3.360 1570 3.295 1005 3.490 .20 3.22:1 1280 3.280 1565 S.170 1060 3.417 '5 \ 3.150 1275 3.220 1560 3.040 1055 3.340 10 3.085 1270 3.182 1050 3.250 5 a.ow

O"'T" ELEV"'TlON. 1267.02 G,,;,;,ELFlVAT'ON 1662.0 IGATJl:J';uEVATlO" 1041.0 I G,;,1' I,LEvATw>r 9011.0 B195 3.530 1580 3.550 1075 3.550 25 3.150 1290 3.457 1676 8.355 1070 3AU4 20 a.allo 1285 3.380 1572 3.290 lOOo 3.432 15 a.aoo 1280 3.300 1568 3.345 lOGO 3.365 10 a.lus 1275 3.213 1564 . 3.465 1055 3.290 5 3.080

ATE 'L"'''AT'ON 561.5 GATE ELI;;VAnON 10220 1 OAr E 580 . S < LEVAno", 236.0 GATE E""VAUOY 655.4

iii I flil I i~li I Hn I t~ I Hi! I Iff I Hig 664 2.050 ISgg 3.460 10 3.500 568 ~::gg 1025 33'.0:

1000 6 3.410 565 3.320

1270 . 3.120 G"'Tm E"lOVATU)N 1210.48\ GATEELEVATlON 1661.0 !GATF.Er.EVATlON 10-15.0 I UA1'g BL"VATlO" 100(\.0

1295 3.600 1580 3.665 1075 3.037 18 3.G10 1290 3.530 1517 3.650 1070 3.565 15 3.(1.%

. 1:>.85 3.462 1573 3.600 1005 30490 12 3.605 128

0410 DRUM GATES

TABLE 2.-(Continued)

Hoovma DAM (Arizona-Nevada) HoovER DAM (Arizona-Nevada) lloovnm DAM (Arizona-Nevada)SHAPE 4-M3 SHAPE 8-115 SHAPE 7-C4

Total head Cooff. Total head CoeD- Total hend xoct-on gate, cienct, on gate, cleat,in feet Ce in 1et C, in feet C,

GATE ELEVATIO20 1205.4 GATE E.LEVATIONb 1205.4 . GATE ELEVATIONb 1205.4

26 3.670 28 3.735 26 3.136522 3.605 25 3.705 22 3.01318 3.540 20 3.650 18 3.54014 3.472 15 3.565 .14 3.45010 3.405 10 3.460 10 3.3606 3.338 5 3.335 0 3.200

GATE ELEVATION 1209.4 - GATE ELEVATION 1209.4 GATE ELEVATION 120D.0

20 3.675 24 3.590 23 3.72517 3.645 20 3.540 19 3.65014 3.015 16 3.492 15 3.58011 3.585 12 3.428 11 3.508

8 3.555 8 3.330 7 3.415

GATE ELEVATIONr 1213.4 GATE ELEVATION 1213.4 GATE ELEVATION 1213.0

20 3.880 . 20 3765 1W 3.50017 3.875 16 3.705 16 3.84514 3.875 12 3.725 13 3.82511 3.870 8 3.668 10 3.750

8 3.870 4 3.600 7 3.640

GAToE ELxVATION 1217.4 GATE ELEVATION 1217.4 G^ATE EILEVATtON 1217.0

14 3.960 15 3.900 (5 3.s612 3.980 12 . 3.890 13 3.113010 4.010 9 3.900 11 3.9358 4.07 6 3.930 S) 3.970

- 7 4.020

GATE ELEVATION 1221.4 GATE ELEVATION 1221.4 GATE ELVATION 1221.4

10 3.890 11 3.830 I. 4 3.8158 3.930 9 3:840 12 3.8206 4.020 7 3.875 I10 3.8235 4.100 5 3.935 8 3;825

Coordinates of curves prepared by plotting original data. & Gate down.

sharp reversal in the curve when the angle 0 approaches 280, and (3) thatthe coefficient of, discharge is a maximum at this angle. As the angle 0 is in-creased from 280 to 90', contraction of the jet gradually reduces the coefficientto approximately 3.33, which occurs when the weir is vertical. As 0 is de-creased from 280 to 0* the coefficient is gradually reduced-either by approachconditions, friction, or both-to that for a broad-crested weir, which may besome value between 2.8 and 3.1. -As the principal difference between the drumgate and the straight inclined weir lies in the curvature of the gate, the trendsfor the two should be similar.

An inconsistency exists in Fig. 4-namely, the coefficient of discharge for avertical sharp-crested weir should approximate 3.33, but Fig. 4 shows thatBazin obtained 3.45. This conclusion is supported by the fact that the USBR,Ernest W. Schoder, M.ASCE, and Kenneth B. Turner,' and others have not

DRIUIM GATES0

411

4I.4a

02I.0.1H00

t0

.30,

N

aH

0I.k ,ofle8

0

a

0

av

a "Preeiee Weir Measurementa," by Ernest W. Sehoder and Kenneth B. Turner. Transaactions, ASCE,Vol. 93. 1029. p. 999. 9a4JR&O ul 'F

410

HOOVEB DA!o"(Ari.ona-N~V8d8) SHAPE 40M3

Toto.! head on gate, in feet

coom cient. '

C.

OATIS ELEVATION' 1205.4

26 3.670 22 3.605 18 3.540 14 3.472 10 3.405 6 3.338

GAT,. ELEVATION 1209.4

20 3.675 17 3.645 14 3.615 11 3.585

8 3.555

GATE ELISVA'IION 1213.4

20 3.880 17 3.875 14 3.875 11 3.870 8 3.870

OATil ELEVATJON 1217.4

14 3.960 12 3.980 10 4.010 8 4.075

GATE ELEVATION 1221.4

10 3.8\10 8 3.930 6 4.020 5 4.100

DnUM OA'fI':S

TABLE 2. "-( Continued)

I I I I I I I I

HOOVEB DAM (Ari7.ona-Ncvada) SHAPE 8-l\l5

Coeffi-cient,

C.

GATE ELEVATION' 1205.4

28 3.735 25 3.705 20 a.050 15 3.505 10 3.460 5 3.~35

GAT., EL"VATION 1209.4

24 3.5!JO 20 3.510 16 3.492 12 3.428 8 3.330

OATIS ELEVUION 1213.4

20 3.765 16 3.705 12 3.725 8 ~.668 4 3.600

GATE ELISVATION 1217.4

15 3.\100 12 3.8110 9 3.!IOO 6 3.930

GAT., ELEVATION 1221.4

11 3.830 9 3:840 7 3.875 5 3.935

I I I I I I I I

1I00"ER D .. >I (Ari1.Onn-NevBua) SIIAPE 7-C4

Total hend on ~ntc. in feet

Coeffi-cient.

C.

GATE ELF-VATION' 1205.4

2G :l.n05 22 3.tJl5 18 3.540 14 3.450' 10 3.360 6 3.200

GATE ELEVATION 1200.0

23 3.725 19 3.050 15 3.580 II 3.508 7 3.415

GATE ELEVATION 1213.0

III 3.800 16 3.815 13 3.825 10 3.750 7 3.610

GAT}~ ELJ.;VATWN 1217.0

15

I :1.!l!;O

1:1 3.11:10 11 3.035 II 3.1170 7 4.020

GATE ELE\~'\l'ION 1221.4

14 3.815 12 3.820 10 3.823 8 3;825

Coordinates of curVes prepared by plotting origiMI data . Gnte down.

sharp reversal in the curve when the angle 8 approaches 28, and (3) that the coefficient of discharge is a maximum at this angle. As the angle 8 is in-creased from 28 to 90, contraction of the jet gradually reduces the coefficient to approximately 3.33, which occurs when the' weir is vertical. As Ois de-creased from 28 to 0 the coefficient is gradually reduced-either by appronch conditions, friction, or. both-to that for a broad-crested weir, which may be some value between 2.8 and 3.1. .As the principal difference between the drum gate and the straight inclined weir lies in the curvature of the gate, the trends for the two should be similar. .

An inconsistency exists in Fig. 4-namely, the coefficient of discharge for a vertical sharp-cre8ted weir should approximate 3.33, but Fig. 4 shows that Bazin obtained 3.45. This ,conclusion is supported by the fact that the USBR, Ernest w. Schoder, M~ASCE, and Kenneth B. Turner,6 and other~ have not

I "Precise Wefr Measurements," by Ernest. W. Schoner and I(enneth B. Turner, 7'ratllllcliona, ASeR, Vol. 03. 1029. p. 990.

o

~- I .. -~-..,

_O",_co QI 1.0 00 _ ...,.

-tf d d ...; .....

fJ" ~-.5.9,SS i~~&'f:: ..,

-

~ 000 .....

-

x

412 DRUM GATES

been able to check the discharge measurements of Bazin. However, theactual values are not so important for the case at hand as is the significanceof the trend.

The method for combining results from the eleven drum ga(Table 2) consisted of first plotting the coefficient of discharge data

A.

DRUM GATES 413total head, including the velocity head of approach, measured above the highpoint of the gate, and r is the radius of the gate. In Fig, 5, C, is based on therelationship, Q -C, L Ai. For positive values of 0, the head was measuredabove the lip of the gate, whereas for negative angles it was observed abovethe high point, or crest, of the gate proper. The method of measuring thehead is illustrated in Fig. 2.

Upon completion of a similar set of curves for each gate tested, the elevensets of curves were replotted and combined into the chart exhibited as Fig. 6.The results from the various gates showed good general agreement; and thecurves in Fig. 6 constitute the general experimental information needed fordetermining the discharge coefficients for gates in raised or partly raisedpositions. The supporting points are not shown in Fig. 0, but the individualinformation for each gate is listed in Table 2.

ANALYSIS OF TEST RESULTSThe curves in Fig. 6 show a tendency toward reversal, similar to that ex-hibited by the 1azin curve in Fig. 4, but the points of inflection viiry from0 = 200 to 6 - 30', depending on the value of H/r. Fig. 4 showed the co-efficients to vary only slightly with the head, but in this case the coefficientsdefinitely Vary with the head.

A matter of significance is the reversal of the (Ii/r)-order which occurs at290 (Fig. 6). The coefficient of discharge has but one value, 3.88, when 0 ap-proximates 29';.thus, it is insensitive to both the radius and the head on thegate for this angle. The curve for H/r 0 approximates a drum gate ofinfinite radius and was obtained from the data of Bazin (Fig. 4) by apply-ing a uniform adjustment.As stated previously, similitude is valid for small negative angles of 0, aswell as for positive angles up to 900; thus, the curves in Fig. 6 are shownand recommended for use down to 0 = -15'. As the gate is lowered beyondthis angle, the curves double: back and converge, finally terminating in thefree flow coefficient.

The discharge coefficients in the region between 0 = -15 and the gatecompletely down are determined by graphical interpolation. Interpolation isaccomplished by plotting head-discharge curves for several gate angles between-15? and the maximum positive angle. Also the head-discharge curve isplotted for the free crest. This information is then cross-plotted to obtainvalues in the transition zone. The method will be explained in the examplethat follows. It will be discovered that negative angles, greater than -15(with the exception of the free crest) are not particularly important from anoperator's standpoint, as a change in gate position has little effect on the dis-charge in this range.

It.must be assumed that the coefficient of discharge is known for at leastone value of the head on the free crest (gate completely down) for the partic-ular spillway. under consideration. With the coefficient known for one ormore heads, the complete coefficient curve for the free crest can be plotted byconsulting Fig. 7, in which H., and C. are the designed head and the coefficient

hia. 6.--GENERAL CU1VBS -rO 'THE DiZrORMN 0ATION or DiseA rOC CouwrriictET 1

for each gate as illustrated by the sheet for the Shasta Dam gate (Fig. 5).With the coefficient of discharge as the abscissa and H/r as the ordinate, eachcurve in- F , 5 represents a different gate angle 6, which the tangent to thedownstr ip of the gate makes with the horizontal. In all cases, 11 is the i0

412 nRUM GATES

. been able to check the discharge ~easurements of Bazi? /Jo,:c\".~, the actual values are not so important for the case at band n8lS. t Ie slgnl1Cance of the trend. .

METHOD OF COlllBINING TEST RESlJLTS

The method for combining results from the clc.ven drum gates teste~ (Ta.ble 2) consisted of first plotting the coefficient of dJschllrge data SCI nrntel~

:: ~

OO~~---'--.-~r-~--Ir~~-'---r\\~\lJ---r~ ~l---~---t--~~--+---i----1----r---i----t~R~'!:i~:.Hffr--r-~l 40 0.7 0_+-_;

2 0

2l.I 5 . : .,;

0

5

0

-5

10

15

20 2.8

I O'j .2.9 3.0

.-

,/ .;-

I

I I

0.1

Sir . iglt! Inclined . .,,/ ~ y / V I VI/J WelTs (~QO) ~ // ~ V / / ~ rL1JJ.

/ ' , / I / I Iii I I I I I

/' / ,. l cl Ii I l/.1 (

I I

0.2

I I I I, I I, J I I I I 11 1 I 1.11.

0.3 . ~4 Q.5 O.6JO;7 0.810-9 I.O Rallo, -,:- ~ I ~l 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.1 3.8 .

Discharge Coefficient, Cq . .' '. .

. . D tDlSrn1AftGE CO"FI"lctENTS Fro. 6.-GI'lN"llAL Ct1av"sVOft Til" gl'''RYINAT'ON 0

4.0

. for each gate as illustrated by the sheet f?r the Shasta Dam g~t.e(!ig. 5~ . . With the coefficient of discharge as the absclssa. and H I~ as the or ma ,e~~.

. . . . 5 re resents a different gate angle 0, which the tangent ~o e dcurv~"t ID. . ';p otthe g. ate makes with the horizontal. In all eases, II IS the OWIL r . .

DRUM GATES 413

total IJCllci, including the velocity head of approach, mensured above the high point of the gate, nnd r is the radius of the gate. In Fig, 5, C

Q is based on the

relationship, Q = C" L Ht. For posith'e values oC 0, the head was measured above the Jip of the gate, wllerells [or negative angles it was observed above the Iligh point, or crest, of the gate proper. TIlc method o[ inetlSuring the head is illustrated in Fig. 2.

. Upon completion of l1- similar set o{ curves (or each gatc tMted, t11e eleven 8ets of Curves \\'erl) replotted and combined into tIle chart e)(hibited liS Fig. ti. The results from tIle various gates showl)u good general agreement; nnd tIle curves in Fig. 6 constitute the general experimental information needed for determining the dischnrge coefficients for gates in raised or partly raised positiolls. The supporting points are not shown in Fig. 6, but the individual information for each gate is listed ill Table 2.

ANALYSIS OF TEST RESULTS

The Curves in Fig. 6 show a tendency toward reversal, similar to that ex~ hibiteu by the llazin curve in Fig. 4, but the points of inflection vary from o = 20 to 0 = 30, depending on the value 01 H/r. Fig. 4 showed the co-efficients to vary only slightly witI! the head, but in this cnse tIle coefficients definitely vary with the head.

A matter of significance is the reversal of the (IlJr)-order wllicll OCcurs at 29 (Fig. 6). The coefficient of discbarge has but one value, 3.88, when 8 ap_ proximates ~9 ;tltUB, it is insensitive tobotll the radius and the head OIl the gate for this angle, The cUrve lor HJr '= 0 approximates a drum gate of infinite radius and was obtained from the data of Bazin (Fig. 4) by apply-ing 11 uniform adjustment. . .

As stated previously, similitude is valid for small negative aogles of 0, as well as for positive angles up to 90; thus, the curves in Fig. 6 nre shown and recommended for use down to 8 = -15. As the gate is lowered beyond this angle, the curves double. back arid converge, finally terminating in the free fIow coefficient .

TIle discllarge coemcicnts in the region between 0 = -150 nnd tIle gat~ completely down are determined bygrnphical interpolation. Interpol3tion is accomplished by plotting head-discharge curves for several gate angles between - 15':' and the maximum positive angle. Also the head-discharge curve is plotted (or the free crest. This information is then cross-plotted to obtain values in the transition zone. The metllod will be explained in the example that follows. It will be discovered that negative angles: greater thiln -150 (with tho el(ception of the [ree crcst) ate not particularly important from an operator's standpoint, as a change in gate position has little effect on the dis~ charge in this range.

It rnust be assumed that the coefficient of discharge is known for at least one value of the head on the free crest (gate completely down) for the partie-

. .. ular spillway under consideration. With the eoefficientknown for ODe or more heads, the complete coefficient curve lor the {reeClest can be plotted by conSUlting Fig. 7, in which H. and C. are the designed head andthe coefficient

e

DRUM GATES

9 DRUM OATES 415414

for the designed head, respectively, This chart was reproduced from a pre-

vious publicatiooi7 and represents a curve well supported by tests of some fifty

overfoll spillway crests having wide variation in shape and operating conditions.

13 I I - APILICATION OF RIESUL'S

and C. -3.48) is constructed by arbitrarily assuming several values of 11/1I.and reading the corresponding values of C/C. from Fig. 7. The method isillustrated in Table 3, and the head-coelficient curve for free flow

(gate down),obtained in this manner, is shown in Fig. 10.

Crest (Gate Up) Eft 2497.0 ~7/

/2/.

/

1.21.1 From the plan and section

of the Black

1.9 Canyon Diversion Dam (Idaho), shown in

s.9 Figs. 8 and 9, assume that it becomes necfs-0. sary to compute and construct a rating curve0.7 for one drum gate for each 0.5 ft of gate elc-

0.5 vation. The scale on the gate position indi-

0.4 cator is calibrated to show the elevation of

0.4 _ -the is cat

0.2 the high point of the gate, and the gate has a

0.1 constant radius of 21.0 ft. The gate is 64 ft

o o.s 0.9 x. long. The coefficient of discharge for the free

... lio, crest is Co = 3.48 for the designed head (11.)

0of 14.5 ft.Fro. 7.--CofrrlctzNS or DtSCRARGE

With the coefficient of discharge known foro ooTi s TnA . Tfl DparoiiVP free flow at the designed head, the entire free-

flow coefficient curve can be established by consulting Fig. 7. The free-flow

coefficient. curve for Black Canyon Dam spillway (for which H - 14.5 ft

/r4 rt 6

Fia. 9.-OSrj.LwAY CazEs Dr'e,., BJLACK CAHION D)AM IN IDAII3TABLE 3.-I{EAD AND DISCHARGS COMPUTATIONS FOR A FIREE CREST

(BLACK CANYoN, DAM IN IDAHO)

Total head Reservoir Ratio.QJrf lenin 'WYo, flato ,b Ooeffleieot, Q, in on ftHin it elevation, f/1 C/C',C per Aec'

(1) (2) (3) (4) ()) (8)

17 2409.5 1.172 1.020 3.55 15,950

16 2498.5 1.104 1.012 3.62 14,420

14.5 .2497.0 1.0 1.0 3.48 12.296

12 2494.5 0.827 0.080 3.41 9.072

10 2402.5 0.690 0.960 3.34 6,769

8 2400.5 0.552 0.940 3.27 4.730

6 2488.5 0.414 0.905 3.135 2.949

4 2486.5 0.270 0.850 2.957 1,514

3 2485.5 0.207 0.815 2,835 943

2 2484.5 0.138 0,760 2,642 478

*/1. 14.5 ft. A C. - 3.48. * The discharge for one gate: Q CqL Ht, in which L -a 64.0 ft.

Fro. 8.-IPLAN, OT BL&AC CAXTON DIVERSION DAM In IDAMO

414 DnUM OATES

for the designed hea.d, respectively. This cha.rt WIlS reproduced from 1\ pre-vious publicationl and represents 0. curve well supported by tests of some ft(ty overfBllspillway erests having wide variation in shape and operating conditions.

1.2 1.1 1.0 0,9

:+:" 0.8 cf 0.7 '~ 0.6 11

416 DRUM GATESDRUM GATES 417

Before considering the rating of the spillway with gates in raised positions,

it is necessary to construct a diagram such as that shown in Fig. 11 to relate

gate elevation to the angle 0 for the Black Canyon Dam gate. The tabulation

in Fig. 11 shows the angle 0 for corresponding elevations of the downstream lip

of the gate at intervals of 2 ft.20 Beginning with the maximum positive

angle of the gate, which is 34.883, thecomputations may be begun by choosing

16 - a representative number of reservoir ele-

vations as indicated in Col. 2, Table 4.

Q The difference between the reservoir ele-12 .vation and the high

point of the gate(which is the downstream lip in this case)constitutes the total head on the gate, and

-4 values of head are recorded in Col. 3.

Col. 4 shows these same heads divided by"Z the radius of the gate, which is 21.0 ft.

* Entering the curves in Fig. 6 with

4 the values in Col. 4, Table 4, for 0 =

+34.883,,the discharge coefficients, listed

-in Col. 5 of the set of computations desig-

a nated "A," are obtained. The remainder

2.6 3.0 3.4 3.8 of the procedure outlined in Cols. 6 and

Coeffcient, Cq 7, Table 4, consists of computing the dis-Fie. 10.-HEAe-COEMIRNT CURVE, charge for one gate from the expression,

BLACE CANTON DA, IIN IDAHO Q = CL H1. A similar procedure ofcomputation is repeated for other positive angles of 0 as

in sets B, C, and D of

Table 4.As the angle 0 is given negative values, the procedure

for determining the

discharge remains the same for angles between 0 and -15', except that the

head on the gate is measured above the high point rather than above the lip.

Discharge computations for negative angles of the gate down to -15.017*

are tabulated in E, F, and G of Table 4.Plotting values of discharge, reservoir elevation, and gate.

elevation from

Table 4 results in the seven curves in Fig. 12 for which the points are denoted

by. circles. The extreme lower curve, on which the points are identified by

x-marks, represents the discharge of the free crest with the gate completely

down. The latter values were obtained from Table 3.The discharge values shown in Fig. 12 are for one gate only. When

more

than, one gate is in operation, the discharges from the separate gates may be

totaled providing the gates are each raised the same amount. .The experi-

mental models contained from one to four gates (with the exception of that of

Grand Coulee Dam, which contained eleven) so a reasonable allowance for

pier effect on the discharge is already present in. the results.

The intervals between the eight curves identified by-points (Fig. 12) are

too great for rating purposes, especially the gap between gate elevations,

2485.75 ft 2482.5 ft. This is remedied by cross-plotting the eight curves

for various constant values of the discharge as shown in Fig. I3. Fortunately,

the result is a straight-line variation for any constant value of discharge. The

lines in Fig. 13 are not quite parallel and there is no assurance that they will

be straight for every drum gate. Nevertheless, this will not detract appreci-

FIG. IJ.-R-LATION8IIIP OF oCATE ELEVATION TO ANGLE a

ably from thle accuracy obtained. Interpolated information from Fig. 13 isthen utilized to construct the additional curves in Fig. 12. If all curves areconsidered, Fig. 12 shows the completed rating for the. Black Canyon Damspillway for 0.5-ft gate intervals. For intermediate values, straight-lineinterpolation is permissible.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper has demonstrated how an existing control structure, such asthe Black Canyon Dam spillway, can also serve as a rating station. Theaccuracy of rating curves obtained by the method is estimated to approachthat of an average current-meter traverse of the river providing that (1) thegate position indicators are made as large as possible and are accurately cali-

416 DRUM GATES

Before considering the rating of the spillway with gates in raised positions, it is necessary to construct a diagram such as that shown in Fig. 11 to relate gate elevation to the angle 0 for the Black Canyon Dam gate. The tabulation in Fig. 11 shows the angle (J for corresponding elevations of the downstream lip

.S

20

16

4 V o 2.6

I

ij I

V 3.0 3.4

CoeffiCient, Cq

of the gate at intervals of 2 ft. Beginning with the maximum positive

angle of the gate, which is 34.883, the computations may be begun by choosing a representative number of reservoir ele-vations as indicated in Col. 2, Table 4. The difference between the reservoir ele-vation and the high point of the gate (which. is the downstream lip in this case) constitutes the total head on the gate, and values. of head are recorded in Col. 3. Col. 4 shows these same heads divided by the radius of the gate, which is 21.0 ft.

Entering the curves in Fig. 6 with the values in CoL 4, Table 4, for (J = +34:883,.the discharge coefficients, listed in Col. 5 of the set of computations desig-nated "A," are obtained. The remainder

3.8 of the procedure outlined in Cols. 6 and 7, Table 4, consists of computing the dis-charge for one gate from the expression, Q = C Q L HI. A similar procedure of

Fio. 10.-HJ!lAD-CoJ!lrnc'&NT CuRvm, BL4CIt CANTON V ..... IN IDAHO

computation is repeated for other positive angles of 0 as in sets B, C, and D of Table 4 ..

As the angle (J is given negative values, the procedure for determining the discharge remains the same for angles between 0 imd _15, except that the head on the gate is measured above the high 110int rather than above the lip. Discharge computations for negative angles of the gate down to -15.017 are tabulated iDE, F, and G of Table 4.

Plotting values of discharge, reservoir elevation, and gate elevation from Table 4 results in the seven curves in Fig. 12 for which the points arc denoted by circles. The extreme lower curve,on which the points are identified by x-marks, represents the discharge of the free crest with the gate completely down. The latter values were obtained from Table 3.

The discharge values shown in Fig. 12 arc for one gate only. When more than one gate is in operation, the discharges from the separate gates may be totaled ; providing the gates are each raised the same amount .. The experi-mental models contained from one to four gates (with the exception of that of Grand' Coulee Dam, which contained eleven) so a reli.sonable allowance for. pier efiect on the discharge is already present in the results.

The intervals between the eight curves identified by pointS (Fig. 12) are too great for rating purposes, especiallY the gap between gate elevations,

2485~75 ft It ~482.5 ft. This is remedied by cross-plotting the eight curves

DnUM GATES 417

for vnriou~ consta?t vaJ.ues of thedischargc 118 shown in Fig. 13. Fortunately t.he r~sul~.18 a strtught-hne variation for any constant value of discharge Th '. lines 10 Fig 13 t't . [ . e b . . . are no. qUI e para lei and there is no assurance that they wiJ]

e strlllght for e\'ery urum gate. Nevertheless, this will not detract appreci-

(I CtHI 1412" (I Pln"I ... '

\ e. ~,4.",

i !

* _______ [1 '''''.0 "';"~"--_____ 1;1 249'.0

-------lI...!..!.!l.:..L __ -4---___ !~

-H".) .!.!~~6 11.050 "'.'.01)' .30'.' IT.16 - '.2ii

1"'0. 1J.-RF.r..AT[~N8r([p or GATE ELEVATION TO ANGLE 8

:,bly frt~~ the aceumcy obtained. Interpolated information from Fig 13 is len u I !Zeu to construct the additional Curves in FI'g 12 If 11 .

'u d F' . . a curves Ilrc CO?SI ere, 'Ig. 12 shows .the completed rating for the Black Canyon Dam ?Ptlllwo.YI ~or ,O.5-ft ~ate Intervals. For intermediate values straight-line In erpo atlOn IS permissible. . . ,

CONCLUSIONS

.. the ~~:cf!l~:: has demonst~ated how an existing control structure, such as . ~on Dam spillway, can also serve as a rating station. The a~curacy of rating CUrves obtained by the method is estimated to approach

t at of ~~ av~ra~e current-meter traverse of the river providing that (1) the gate pOSitIOn indicators are made as large as possible and are accurately cali.

e

*0418 DRUM

GATESDRtUiM GATES

419

brated, (2) the reservoir gage can be read to within 0.05 ft, (3) nearly atmos-

pheric pressure exists under the sheet of water after it springs from the gate,

and (4) all gates are set at approximately the same elevation.

TABLE 4.-HEAD AND DISCHARGE COMPIUTATIONS Fon DRuM GATES

IN RAISED POSITIONS

Reser- R o, Coeffj- 11, Q, in Re,

i

voir H t i eu n Set eoira - Ratio. Coeffi.

Il , i

S t eleva- in H cienti. iS elepr- in

I e ents, in ciI ft

tio, fe cc ft 'er 1 !in

ft. Y C. ft ()per

in ft in ft t

i ee

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)

(7)

GATE ELEVATION 2497.0; 0 + 34.88' GATl, ELEVATiON 2489.0: 0 - 1.28'

2498.0 1 0.048 3.86 1 247

A 24 2 0.095 3.86 2.828 099 2490.0 1

0.048 3.21 1 205

2500.0 3 0.143 3.86 5.196 1.283 2491.0 2 0.095

3.28 2.828 594

I 2492.0 3 0.143 3.34 5.190 1.111

E 2404.0 5 0.238 3.45 11.18 2,469

2-196.0 7 0.333 3.545 18.52 4,202

GATE ELEVATION 2495.0; 0 + 23.43| 24198.0 9 0.429 3.63 27.00 6.273

12500.0 11 0.521 3.695 30.48 8,627

2496.0 1 0.*048 3.85 1 246 - _____-- --

-___-

-

2497.0 2 0.095 3.80 2.828 698

B 2498.0 3 0.143 3.87 5.190 1,284 UA.T ELF.vATION

2487.2; 0 - - 8.280

2499.0 4 0.190 3.87 I 8.00 1,9792500.0 5 0.238 3.88 11.18

2,7702488.0 0.8 0.038 3.02 0.716

1382489.0 1.8 0.080 3.10 2.415

47D

GATE ELEvATroN 2493.0; 6 = + 14.22' 2490.0 2.8 0.133 3.17 4.685

950

F 2192.0 4.8 0.229 3.31 10.52 2,229

2494.0 6.8 0.324 3.13 17.73 3.892

2494.0 1 0.048 3,09 1 236 2196.0 8.8 0.419 3.51

26.10 5.863

2495.0 2 0.095 3.73 2.828 675 2498.0 0.8 0.515

3.58 35.49 8,131

C 2496.0 3 0.143 3.75 5.106 1,247 2500.0 12.8

0.610 3035 45.79 10,.53

2498.0 5 0.238 3.80 11.18 2,719

2500.0 7 0.333 3.84 18.52 4,552

______

(,ATE ELEVATION 2485.75; 0 - 15.02'

GAT ELEVATION 2491.0; 0 + 6.130 -

0 .- . 0 3.60 - - - 6-2 187.0 1.25 0.000 3.00 1.398

208

2488.0 2.25 0.107 3.07 3.375 003

2492.0 1 0.048 3.47 1 222 248o.0 3.25 0.155 3.15

5.850 1.181

2493.0 2 0.095 3.51 2.828 635 G 2491.0 5.25 0-250 3.275

12.03 . 2,522

D 2494.0 3 0.143 3.57 5,196 1,187 G 2493.0 7.25 0.345 3.375

19.52 4,216

D 2496.0 5 0.235 3.63 11.18 2,597 2495.0 9.25 0.440 3.405 28.13 0.238

2498.0 7 0.333 3.70 18.52 4,386 2197.0 11.25 0.530 3.54

37.73 8.548

2500.0 9 0.429 3.77 27.00 6.515 2499.0 13.25 0.631 3.595 48.23

11,087

H is the total head on the gate. & The discharge for one gate: Q - C. L III.

--In connection with provision (3), the blunt piers on the Black Canyon Dam

spillway, Figs. 8 and 9, provide effective aeration under the overfalling sheet

of. water for all but very small heads with gate completely raised. In the

case of provision (4), uniform operation of the gates is also most desirable from

the standpoint of stilling basin operation for minimum erosion downstream.

Discharge measurements on the prototype are desirable whenever possible

as a check on the accuracy of the foregoing method. Sufficient observations

should be taken, however, to esta~blish the fact that the prototype information

is consistent and reliable.

0

0

I.4-

.2

02

31C

NCN4

CId

- C,4

C,

I,1:

d

0 M g r., , I IclN Nf At e

100 C4

'UO)Ejj 04 Nq C4 ~

418 DRUM OATES

brated, (2) the reservoir gage can be read to within 0.05 ft, (3) nenrly atmos-pheric pressure exists under the sheet of water after it springs from the gate, ,and (4) all gates are set at approximately the same elevation. TABLE 4.-HEAD AND DISCHAiWE COMPUTATIONS Fon DnUM GAn;s IN H.AISED POSITIONS

= :

r'-\ R~too~ ~II, Q, in R(\,)er UP,tto. Ill, fl. in voir H, voir !l, Cocm. Set elevB- in H cicnt.~, In cU It Set eh.!\'n, In II eicnt8, in cit It tion, {ta -; C. It per tiOIl, fta - C, It prr in ft sccb in It r ~ccft (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) GATE ELEVATION 2497.0; 8 = + 34.88 GATt: F.LEYATION 24sn,O: 0 = - 1.28'

-

\2498.0 \ 1 \ 0,048 \ 3.86 \ 1 \ 247 2,190,0 1 0.048 3,21 I 205 A 2499,0 2 0.095 3.S6 2.828 699

2500.0 3 0.143 3.86 5.196 1.283 2491.0 2 o ,OilS 3,28 2,828 Ml.l 2492,0 3 0,143 3,31 5.1YG 1.111 E 219

SHULIT8 ON DRUM GATES 421420 DR