MISSOURI AIR CONSERVATION COMMISSION

PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT

Under the authority of RSMo 643 and the Federal Clean Air Act the applicant is authorized to construct the air contaminant source(s) described below, in accordance with the laws, rules and conditions as set forth herein.

Permit Number: l O 2 O l 8 _ O O 3 Project Number: 2018-04-046 Installation Number: 221-0046

Parent Company: Potosi Charcoal, LLC

Parent Company Address: 10380 Fountain Farm Drive, Cadet, MO 63630

Installation Name:

Installation Address:

Location Information:

Potosi Charcoal, LLC

10380 Fountain Farm Drive, Cadet, MO 63630

Washington County, S32, T38N, R3E

Application for Authority to Construct was made for: Installation of 8 new kilns and bagging operation. This review was conducted in accordance with Section (5), Missouri State Rule 10 CSR 10-6.060, Construction Permits Required.

D Standard Conditions (on reverse) are applicable to this permit.

~ Standard Conditions (on reverse) and Special Conditions are applicable to this permit.

Effective Date

STANDARD CONDITIONS:

Permission to construct may be revoked if you fail to begin construction or modification within two years from the effective date of this permit. Permittee should notify the Enforcement and Compliance Section of the Air Pollution Control Program if construction or modification is not started within two years after the effective date of this permit, or if construction or modification is suspended for one year or more.

You will be in violation of 10 CSR 10-6.060 if you fail to adhere to the specifications and conditions listed in your application, this permit and the project review. In the event that there is a discrepancy between the permit application and this permit, the conditions of this permit shall take precedence. Specifically, all air contaminant control devices shall be operated and maintained as specified in the application, associated plans and specifications.

You must notify the Enforcement and Compliance Section of the Department's Air Pollution Control Program of the anticipated date of start up of this (these) air contaminant source(s). The information must be made available within 30 days of actual startup. Also, you must notify the Department's regional office responsible for the area within which you are located within 15 days after the actual start up of this (these) air contaminant source(s).

A copy of the permit application and this permit and permit review shall be kept at the installation address and shall be made available to Department's personnel upon request.

You may appeal this permit or any of the listed special conditions to the Administrative Hearing Commission (AHC), P.O. Box 1557, Jefferson City, MO 65102, as provided in RSMo 643.075.6 and 621.250.3. If you choose to appeal, you must file a petition with the AHC within 30 days after the date this decision was mailed or the date it was delivered, whichever date was earlier. If any such petition is sent by registered mail or certified mail, it will be deemed filed on the date it is mailed. If it is sent by any method other than registered mail or certified mail, it will be deemed filed on the date it is received by the AHC.

If you choose not to appeal, this certificate, the project review and your application and associated correspondence constitutes your permit to construct. The permit allows you to construct and operate your air contaminant source(s), but in no way relieves you of your obligation to comply with all applicable provisions of the Missouri Air Conservation Law, regulations of the Missouri Department of Natural Resources and other applicable federal, state and local laws and ordinances.

The Air Pollution Control Program invites your questions regarding this air pollution permit. Please contact the Construction Permit Unit using the contact information below.

Contact Information: Missouri Department of Natural Resources

Air Pollution Control Program P.O. Box 176

Jefferson City, MO 65102-0176 (573) 751-4817

The regional office information can be found at the following website:

- 2 -

SPECIAL CONDITIONS:

Project No. 2018-04-046 Permit No.

102018-00,

The permittee is authorized to construct and operate subject to the following special conditions:

The special conditions listed in this permit were included based on the authority granted the Missouri Air Pollution Control Program by the Missouri Air Conservation Law (specifically 643.075) and by the Missouri Rules listed in Title 10, Division 10 of the Code of State Regulations (specifically 10 CSR 10-6.060). For specific details regarding conditions, see 10 CSR 10-6.060 paragraph (12)(A)10. "Conditions required by permitting authority."

Potosi Charcoal, LLC Washington County, S32, T38N, R3E

1. Control Device Requirements-Afterburner A. Potosi Charcoal, LLC shall control emissions from System #1 consisting of

charcoal kilns #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, and #8 with Afterburner #1 (EP-01A and EP-01 B [start-up fuel]) as specified in the permit application. The afterburner shall be operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacture r's specifications.

B. Only three kilns can be in the burn cycle at any time. The remaining kilns will be idle, loading, unloading or in the cool down cycle.

C. Potosi Charcoal, LLC shall continuously monitor and record the temperature of the Afterburner #1 any time the charcoal kilns #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, and #8 are in operation.

D. Potosi Charcoal, LLC shall ensure that the temperature of the Afterburner #1 is maintained at a setpoint operating temperature of 1600°F, with a 1520°F minimum temperature allowed, for a minimum residence time of 1.7 seconds to ensure continued compliance.

E. Potosi Charcoal, LLC has the option of submitting an afterburner temperature control analysis and proposing an alternate temperature control plan to the Director of the Air Pollution Control Program. Upon approval by the Director, an alternate temperature control plan including any revised operating temperatures can be implemented.

F. Potosi Charcoal, LLC shall maintain an operating and maintenance log for Afterburner #1 which shall include the following: 1) Incidents of malfunction, with impact on emissions, duration of

event, probable cause, and corrective actions; and 2) Maintenance activities, with inspection schedule, repair actions,

and replacements, etc.

2. Control Device Requirement-Baghouse A. Potosi Charcoal, LLC shall control emissions from the equipment EP-05,

EP-06, EP-07, EP-08, EP-09, EP-10, EP-12, EP-13, and EP-14 as listed in Table 1 using a baghouse as specified in the permit application.

- ~ -

SPECIAL CONDITIONS:

Project No. 2018-04-046 Permit No.

102018-00~

The permittee is authorized to construct and operate subject to the following special conditions:

B. The baghouse shall be operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. The baghouse shall be equipped with a gauge or meter, which indicates the pressure drop across the control device. These gauges or meters shall be located such that Department of Natural Resources' employees may easily observe them.

C. Replacement filters for the bag house shall be kept on hand at all times. The bags shall be made of fibers appropriate for operating conditions expected to occur (i.e. temperature limits, acidic and alkali resistance, and abrasion resistance).

D. Potosi Charcoal, LLC shall monitor and record the operating pressure drop across the baghouse at least once every 24 hours when the associated equipment is in operation. The operating pressure drop shall be maintained within the design conditions specified by the manufacturer's performance warranty.

E. Potosi Charcoal, LLC shall maintain a copy of the baghouse manufacturer's performance warranty on site.

F. Potosi Charcoal, LLC shall maintain an operating and maintenance log for the baghouse which shall include the following: 1) Incidents of malfunction, with impact on emissions, duration of

event, probable cause, and corrective actions; and 2) Maintenance activities, with inspection schedule, repair actions,

and replacements, etc.

3. Control Device Requirement-Hoods A. Potosi Charcoal, LLC shall use hoods to capture emissions from the

emission units EP-05, EP-06, EP-07, EP-08, EP-09, EP-10, EP-12, EP-13, and EP-14 as listed in Table 1. A hood is a shaped inlet to a pollution control system that does not totally surround emissions from an emission unit.

B. Potosi Charcoal, LLC shall minimize cross drafts by locating the emissions source and the hood inside a building with 4 sides and a roof as required in Special Condition 4.

C. Potosi Charcoal, LLC shall design and construct each hood according to the most current version of the industrial ventilation manual entitled, "Industrial Ventilation - A Manual of Recommended Practice, American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists".

- .d. -

Project No. 2018-04-046

Permit No. 1 0 2 0 1 8 - 0 0 3

SPECIAL CONDITIONS: The permittee is authorized to construct and operate subject to the following special conditions:

D. Potosi Charcoal, LLC shall demonstrate that each hood was constructed according to Special Condition 3.C. by keeping a record of the following design parameters for each hood: 1) the cross-sectional area of the hood inlet 2) the distance from the hood inlet to the emissions source 3) the minimum recommended volumetric airflow 4) the minimum recommended hood face velocity

E. At least one time per calendar year (no less than nine calendar months and no more than 15 calendar months following the previous measurement), Potosi Charcoal, LLC shall verify the proper operation of each hood by recording the actual face velocity or the actual volumetric airflow of each capture hood performing a visual smoke puff test at each emissions source.

4. Control Device-Building Enclosure A. All subject areas (screening and bagging operation- EP-05, EP-06, EP-07,

EP-08, EP-09, EP-10, EP-12, EP-13, and EP-14 as listed in Table 1) shall be fully enclosed with a building enclosure with limited openings to allow for proper ventilation; All access and egress shall remain closed at all times except as needed for people and vehicles to pass through.

B. Any building enclosure shall be subject to general ventilation that maintains the interior of the building enclosure at a lower than ambient pressure to ensure in-draft through any openings at all times.

C. Any building enclosure shall be ventilated to a baghouse or other type of filter particulate collection equipment.

D. All connected enclosures may utilize the same shared ventilation system, provided that the required negative pressure level is maintained.

5. Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements A. Potosi Charcoal, LLC shall maintain all records required by this permit for

not less than five years and shall make them available immediately to any Missouri Department of Natural Resources' personnel upon request.

B. Potosi Charcoal, LLC shall report to the Air Pollution Control Program's Compliance/Enforcement Section, by mail at P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102 or by e-mail at AirComplainceReporting@dnr.mo.gov, no later than 10 days after the end of the month during which any record required by this permit shows an exceedance of a limitation imposed by this permit.

- i:; -

Project No. 2018-04-046

Permit Ncr_t O 2 0 1 8 - O O 3

SPECIAL CONDITIONS: The permittee is authorized to construct and operate subject to the following special conditions:

6. Performance Testing A. Potosi Charcoal, LLC shall conduct performance tests on Afterburner #1

with three kilns burning simultaneously sufficient to demonstrate compliance with the emission rates of PM, VOCs and CO set forth in 1 O CSR 10-6.330. voe emissions shall be calculated as pounds of voe per hour, not reported on a carbon or propane basis. Nitrogen Oxide emissions shall be tested as pounds of NOx per hour. A voe control efficiency shall be determined using the afterburner. In conjunction with the performance test, Potosi Charcoal, LLC shall also establish a MHDR for charcoal production of the new kiln system. The MHDR of the new kiln system shall be equal to or less than 1.235 tons per hour.

B. These tests shall be performed within 60 days after achieving the maximum production rate of the installation, but not later than 180 days after initial start-up for commercial operation and shall be conducted in accordance with the proposed stack test plan outlined in this Special Condition and performance testing and compliance procedures in 10 CSR 10-6.330 (3)(F).

C. Potosi Charcoal, LLC shall test the kiln system between 90 and 100% of the maximum process/production rate, which equates to 1.112 and 1.235 tons per hour for the Afterburner #1 kiln system. If the kiln system is tested at a rate less than 90% of the maximum production rate, then 110% of the tested rate shall become the maximum allowable production rate. Potosi Charcoal, LLC has the option of conducting future testing in order to increase the maximum allowable production rate under the authority of this permit, not to exceed 1.235 tons per hour. The process/production rate shall be the average production rate conducted during compliance testing.

D. Testing shall be conducted during periods of representative conditions at the maximum process/production rates, not to include periods of startup, shutdown, or malfunction. A description of the representative conditions for the performance tests is listed in 10 CSR 10-6.330 (3)(F).

E. A completed Proposed Test Plan Form (enclosed) must be submitted to the Air Pollution Control Program 30 days prior to the proposed test date so that the Air Pollution Control Program may arrange a pretest meeting, if necessary, and assure that the test date is acceptable for an observer to be present. The Proposed Test Plan may serve the purpose of notification and must be approved by the Director prior to conducting the required emission testing.

F. An electronic copy of the performance test results shall be sent to Stacktestina@dnr mo aov within 30 days of completion of any required testing. The report must include legible copies of the raw data sheets, analytical instrument laboratory data, and complete sample calculations from the required U.S. EPA Method for at least one sample run.

- R -

SPECIAL CONDITIONS:

Project No. 2018-04-046 Permit No.

102018-00:

The permittee is authorized to construct and operate subject to the following special conditions:

G. The test report is to fully account for all operational and emission parameters addressed both in the permit conditions as well as in any other applicable state or federal rules or regulations.

H. Actual conditions under which performance testing is conducted shall be recorded as stipulated in 10 CSR 10-6.330 (3)(F) and this Special Condition throughout each of the test runs. These conditions are to include all relevant process/production parameters, all parameters relating to the status of emission controls, and all parameters set forth in 10 CSR 10-6.330 (3)(F). This data is to be included in the emissions test report. In addition, the report shall include emission factors for PM, voes and CO which shall be determined using emission rates and recorded charcoal production rates that have occurred during testing. No maintenance or upgrade of emission control efficiency shall be undertaken during emission testing.

I. Emission testing results, in "mass of pollutant/volume of air," shall be reported for the pollution source airstream, free from any extraneous source of dilution air. Potential dilution air streams shall either be sealed off prior to testing or else be measured by appropriate EPA test methods and subtracted from the total airflow at the sampling location. Failure to account for dilution air can lead to cancellation of testing and/or a violation notice for "circumvention".

J. Potosi Charcoal, LLC shall receive approval from the Air Pollution Control Program prior to any changes in the process or throughput allowed at this installation other than that which is tested at the time of performance test.

7. Fuel Requirements Afterburner #1 shall be fueled exclusively by propane (LPG).

8. Best Management Practices Requirement Potosi Charcoal, LLC shall control fugitive emissions from all of the haul roads and vehicular activity areas at this site by performing BMPs as defined in Attachment AA.

9. Potosi Charcoal, LLC shall submit revised calculations of the potential to emit to the Permitting Unit of the Air Pollution Control Program within 30 days of submitting the test results report, if the emissions tested exceed any of the emission rates stated in Table 2.

- 7 -

REVIEW OF APPLICATION FOR AUTHORITY TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE SECTION (5) REVIEW

Project Number: 2018-04-046 Installation ID Number: 221-0046

Permit Number: 1 O 2 0 1 8 _ 0 0 3

Installation Address: Potosi Charcoal, LLC 10380 Fountain Farm Drive Cadet, MO 63630

Washington County, S32, T38N, R3E

Parent Company: Potosi Charcoal, LLC 10380 Fountain Farm Drive Cadet, MO 63630

REVIEW SUMMARY

• Potosi Charcoal, LLC has applied for authority to construct 8 charcoal kilns and a bagging operation.

• The application was deemed complete on May 8, 2018.

• HAP emissions are expected from the proposed equipment. HAPs of concern from this process are methanol and Polycyclic Organic Matter (POM). HAPs of concern from this process are below major source level and individual SMALs.

• None of the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) apply to the installation.

• None of the NESHAPs apply to this installation. None of the currently promulgated MACT regulations apply to the proposed equipment.

• Afterburner #1 (EP-01A-B) is being used to control the PM, PM10, PM2 5, voe, and HAPs emissions from the eight kilns in this permit. A baghouse with hoods and building enclosure is used to control PM, PM10, and PM2.5 in the bagging operation.

• This review was conducted in accordance with Section (5) of Missouri State Rule 10 CSR 10-6.060, Construction Permits Required. Potential emissions of all pollutants are below de minimis levels.

• This installation is located in Washington County, an attainment area for all criteria pollutants.

• This installation is on the List of Named Installations found in 10 CSR 10-6.020(3)(8), Table 2. The installation is classified as item number 25. Charcoal production facilities. The installation's major source level is 100 tons per year and fugitive emissions are counted toward major source applicability.

- 8 -

• Ambient air quality modeling was not performed since potential emissions of the application are below de minimis levels.

• Emissions testing is required for Kilns 1-8 and their associated afterburner as a part of this permit. Testing is required as part of 10 CSR 10-6.330.

• A Basic Operating Permit application is not required for this installation since the conditioned potential emissions of the facility are below de minimis.

• Approval of this permit is recommended with special conditions.

INSTALLATION DESCRIPTION

Potosi Charcoal, LLC is a new installation near Cadet, Missouri in Washington County.

No permits have been issued to Potosi Charcoal, LLC from the Air Pollution Control Program.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Potosi Charcoal, LLC is constructing a new installation of eight new charcoal kilns controlled by one afterburner near Cadet, Missouri in Washington County. The new kilns will be part of System #1 which consists of a set of eight kilns (Kilns #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7 and #8) and controlled by Afterburner #1. Only three kilns will be in the burn phase at any given time while the remaining five will be in the cool down phase, being loaded with wood slabs or charcoal being unloaded. The 8-Kiln/1 Afterburner system is design for a maximum production of 10,816 tons per year of charcoal with a MHDR of 1.235 tons per hour. The facility will be installing a screening and bagging operation for the lump charcoal product. The bagging operation will consist of conveyors and a screen enclosed in a building with ventilation control. Hoods in the bagging operation will be vented to a baghouse as well. There will be one baghouse to control the hoods and building enclosure emissions.

- 9 -

Table 1: List of Emission Points Emission Point Description MHDR EP-01A Kilns #1-8 1.235 tph EP-01 B Kilns #1-8 (Start-up Fuel) LPG (Propane) 0.022 103gallons EP-02 Unload kilns 1.235 tph EP-03A Charcoal Storaqe Activity 1.235 tph EP-038 Charcoal Storage Wind 1 acre EP-04 Haul Road 2.7 VMT EP-05 Hopper (Enclosed building with bag house) 1.235 tph EP-06 Conveyor (Enclosed buildinq with baghouse) 1.235 tph EP-07 Feeder (Enclosed building with baghouse) 1.235 tph EP-08 Screen (Enclosed building with baghouse) 1.235 tph EP-09 Conveyor (Enclosed building with baghouse) 0.988 tph EP-10 Conveyor (Enclosed building with baghouse) 0.988 tph EP-11 Truck Loadouts 1.235 tph EP-12 Hopper (Enclosed building with baghouse) 0.988 tph EP-13 Conveyor (Enclosed building with baghouse) 0.988 tph EP-14 Bagger (Enclosed building with baghouse) 0.988 tph

EMISSIONS/CONTROLS EVALUATION

The potential emissions of methanol and POM were determined using emission factors from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) document AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Fifth Edition, Section 10. 7 Charcoal (September, 1995). Uncontrolled emissions of methane are estimated to be 595 tons per year; uncontrolled emissions of methanol are estimated to be 811 tons per year for the set of eight kilns; and uncontrolled emissions of POM are estimated to be 0.051 tons per year for the set of eight kilns. Test reports will have to confirm that the expected control efficiency for all volatile compounds. For the PTE in Table 2, a 99% control efficiency was used. Sulfur oxides (SOx) emissions are expected to be negligible due to low sulfur content in the fuel and were not determined.

CO2 emissions were calculated using the stack data test report from an unassociated set of kilns. These emissions calculations will need to be verified when actual testing of these kilns is conducted.

Likewise, all particulate matter (including condensables) emissions, VOCs emissions, CO emissions, NOx emissions, as well as gas analysis for carbon dioxide shall be tested as require in 10 CSR 10-6.330, Restriction of Emissions from Batch-Type Charcoal Kilns. Minimum temperature of the afterburner will also be established in order to achieve the requirements of this rule.

For the bagging operation, EP-05 through EP-14, the emission factors used in this analysis were obtained from the EPA document AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Fifth Edition as submitted by the applicant. A 98% capture efficiency of the building, 90% capture efficiency of the hoods, and a 99.5% control efficiency was applied for the bagging operation.

- 10 -

Emissions from charcoal handling: • Calculated using emission factors from Factors Information REtrieval System

(FIRE), sec 30501607 for Raw Material Transfer and Conveying. • Calculated screening using emission factors from FIRE, sec 30502002 for

Secondary Crushing/Screening. • The uncontrolled emission factors were used.

Emissions from haul roads and vehicular activity areas: • Calculated using the predictive equation from AP-42 Section 13.2.2 "Unpaved

Roads," November 2006. • A 90% control efficiency for PM and PM10 and a 74% control efficiency for PM2.s

were applied to the emission calculations for the use of BMPs.

Emissions from storage piles: • Load-in and load-out of storage piles were calculated using the predictive

equation from AP-42 Section 13.2.4. • Emissions from wind erosion of storage piles were calculated using an equation

found in the Air Pollution Control Program's Emissions Inventory Questionnaire Form 2.8 "Storage Pile Worksheet."

The following table provides an emissions summary for this project. This is a new installation therefore there are no existing potential emissions. Potential emissions of the application represent the potential of the new equipment, assuming continuous operation (8760 hours per year).

Table 2: Emissions Summary tpy)

Regulatory Existing Pollutant De Minimis Potential

Levels Emissions

PM 25.0 NIA PM10 15.0 NIA

PM2s 10.0 N/A

SOx 40.0 N/A

NOx 40.0 N/A

voe 40.0 N/A co 100.0 N/A

GHG (C02e) N/A NIA GHG (mass) N/A N/A

HAPs3 10.0/25.0 N/A

POM2 10.0 N/A

Methanol 10.0 NIA NIA = Not Applicable; N/D = Not Determined 1 Methanol's major source level is 10 tons/yr.

Existing Potential

Actual Emissions

Emissions of the Project

N/A N/D4

NIA 13.928 N/A 8.57

NIA N/D N/A 27.07

NIA 0.78

NIA 7.86 NIA 9869.93 N/A 9846.0 N/A 0.57 N/A 5.0E-5 N/A 0.57

2Major source level is 10 tons per year; SMAL for POM is 0.01 tons per year. 3Combined HAPs is Methanol and POM. 4Less than major source threshold of 100 tpy

- 11 -

PERMIT RULE APPLICABILITY

This review was conducted in accordance with Section (5) of Missouri State Rule 10 CSR 10-6.060, Construction Permits Required. Potential emissions of all pollutants are below de minimis levels.

APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS

Potosi Charcoal, LLC shall comply with the following applicable requirements. The Missouri Air Conservation Laws and Regulations should be consulted for specific record keeping, monitoring, and reporting requirements. Compliance with these emission standards, based on information submitted in the application, has been verified at the time this application was approved.

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

• Operating Permits, 10 CSR 10-6.065 is not required because the conditioned emissions are below de minimis.

• Start-Up, Shutdown, and Malfunction Conditions, 10 CSR 10-6.050

• Submission of Emission Data, Emission Fees and Process Information, 10 CSR 10-6.110

o Per 10 CSR 10-6.110(4)(B)2.B(II) and (4)(B)2.C(II) a full EIQ is required for the first full calendar year the equipment (or modifications) approved by this permit are in operation.

• Restriction of Particulate Matter to the Ambient Air Beyond the Premises of Origin, 10 CSR 10-6.170

• Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants, 10 CSR 10-6.220

• Restriction of Emission of Odors, 10 CSR 10-6.165

SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS

• Restriction of Emissions From Batch-Type Charcoal Kilns, 10 CSR 10-6.330

- 12 -

STAFF RECOMMENDATION

On the basis of this review conducted in accordance with Section (5), Missouri State Rule 10 CSR 10-6.060, Construction Permits Required, it is recommended that this permit be granted with special conditions.

PERMIT DOCUMENTS

The following documents are incorporated by reference into this permit:

• The Application for Authority to Construct form, dated April 24, 2018, received April 24, 2018, designating Potosi Charcoal, LLC as the owner and operator of the installation.

- 13 -

Attachment AA: Best Management Practices

Haul roads and vehicular activity areas shall be maintained in accordance with at least one of the following options when the plant is operating.

1. Pavement A. The operator shall pave the area with materials such as asphalt, concrete or other

materials approved by the Air Pollution Control Program. The pavement will be applied in accordance with industry standards to achieve control of fugitive emissions while the plant is operating.

B. Maintenance and repair of the road surface will be conducted as necessary to ensure that the physical integrity of the pavement is adequate to achieve control of fugitive emissions from these areas while the plant is operating.

C. The operator shall periodically wash or otherwise clean all of the paved portions of the haul roads as necessary to achieve control of fugitive emissions from these areas while the plant is operating.

2. Application of Chemical Dust Suppressants A. The operator shall apply a chemical dust suppressant (such as magnesium

chloride, calcium chloride, lignosulfonates, etc.) to unpaved areas. B. The quantities of the chemical dust suppressant shall be applied and maintained in

accordance with the manufacturer's recommendation (if available) and in sufficient quantities to achieve control of fugitive emissions from these areas while the plant is operating.

C. The operator shall record the time, date and the amount of material applied for each application of the chemical dust suppressant agent on the above areas. The operator shall keep these records with the plant for not less than five ( 5) years and make these records available to Department of Natural Resources' personnel upon request.

3. Application of Water-Documented Daily A. The operator shall apply water to unpaved areas. Water shall be applied at a rate

of 100 gallons per day per 1,000 square feet of unpaved or untreated surface area while the plant is operating.

B. Precipitation may be substituted for watering if the precipitation is greater than one quarter of one inch and is sufficient to control fugitive emissions.

C. Watering may also be suspended when the ground is frozen, during periods of freezing conditions when watering would be inadvisable for traffic safety reasons, or when there will be no traffic on the roads.

D. The operator shall record the date, volume of water application and total surface area of active haul roads or the amount of precipitation that day. The operators shall also record the rational for not watering ( e.g. freezing conditions or not operating).

E. The operator shall keep these records with the plant for not less than five (5) years, and the operator shall make these records available to Department of Natural Resources' personnel upon request.

_ 1A _

APPENDIX A Abbreviations and Acronyms

0/o .............. percent

~F .............. degrees Fahrenheit

acfm .......... actual cubic feet per minute

BACT ....... Best Available Control Technology

BMPs .... .... Best Management Practices

Btu ............ British thermal unit

CAM ........ Compliance Assurance Monitoring

CAS .......... Chemical Abstracts Service

CEMS ...... Continuous Emission Monitor System

CFR. ......... Code of Federal Regulations

CO ............ carbon monoxide

CO2 ........... carbon dioxide

C02e ......... carbon dioxide equivalent

COMS ...... Continuous Opacity Monitoring System

CSR .......... Code of State Regulations

dscf.. ......... dry standard cubic feet

EIQ ........... Emission Inventory Questionnaire

EP ...... ....... Emission Point

EPA .......... Environmental Protection Agency

EU ............ Emission Unit

fps ............. feet per second

ft ............... feet

GACT ...... Generally Available Control Technology

GHG ......... Greenhouse Gas

gpm .......... gallons per minute

gr .............. grains

GWP ........ Global Warming Potential

HAP .......... Hazardous Air Pollutant

hr .............. hour

hp ............. horsepower

lb ............... pound

lbs/hr ........ pounds per hour

MACT ...... Maximum Achievable Control Technology

/ 3 • b. µgm ........ micrograms per cu 1c meter

mis ............ meters per second

- 15 -

Mgal ......... 1,000 gallons

MW .......... megawatt

MHDR. ..... maximum hourly design rate

MMBtu .... Million British thermal units

MMCF ..... million cubic feet

MSDS ....... Material Safety Data Sheet

NAAQS .... National Ambient Air Quality Standards

NESHAPs National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants

NOx ........... nitrogen oxides

NSPS ........ New Source Performance Standards

NSR .......... New Source Review

PM ............ particulate matter

PM2.5 ......... particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in aerodynamic diameter

PM10 ......... particulate matter less than 10 microns in aerodynamic diameter

ppm .......... parts per million

PSD ........... Prevention of Significant Deterioration

PTE .......... potential to emit

RACT ....... Reasonable Available Control Technology

RAL ........ .. Risk Assessment Level

SCC .......... Source Classification Code

scfm .......... standard cubic feet per minute

SDS ........... Safety Data Sheet

SIC ............ Standard Industrial Classification

SIP ............ State Implementation Plan

SMAL ....... Screening Model Action Levels

SOx ............ sulfur oxides

S02 ............ sulfur dioxide

SSM .......... Startup, Shutdown & Malfunction

tph ............ tons per hour

tpy ............. tons per year

VMT ......... vehicle miles traveled

VOC ......... Volatile Organic Compound

OCT O 5 2018 Mr. Chris Harbison CEO Potosi Charcoal, LLC 10380 Fountain Farm Drive Cadet, MO 63630

RE: New Source Review Permit - Project Number: 2018-04-046

Dear Mr. Harbison:

Enclosed with this letter is your permit to construct. Please study it carefully and refer to Appendix A for a list of common abbreviations and acronyms used in the permit. Also, note the special conditions on the accompanying pages. The document entitled, "Review of Application for Authority to Construct," is part of the permit and should be kept with this permit in your files. Operation in accordance with these conditions, your new source review permit application is necessary for continued compliance. The reverse side of your permit certificate has important information concerning standard permit conditions and your rights and obligations under the laws and regulations of the State of Missouri.

This permit may include requirements with which you may not be familiar. If you would like the department to meet with you to discuss how to understand and satisfy the requirements contained in this permit, an appointment referred to as a Compliance Assistance Visit (CA V) can be set up with you. To request a CAV, please contact your local regional office or fill out an online request. The regional office contact information can be found at the following website: http://dnr.mo.gov/regions/. The online CAV request can be found at http://dnr.mo.gov/cav/compliance.htm.

If you were adversely affected by this permit decision, you may be entitled to pursue an appeal before the administrative hearing commission pursuant to Sections 621.250 and 643.075.6 RSMo. To appeal, you must file a petition with the administrative hearing commission within thirty days after the date this decision was mailed or the date it was delivered, whichever date was earlier. If any such petition is sent by registered mail or certified mail, it will be deemed filed on the date it is mailed; if it is sent by any method other than registered mail or certified mail, it will be deemed filed on the date it is received by the administrative hearing commission, whose contact information is: Administrative Hearing Commission, United States Post Office Building, 131 West High Street, Third Floor, P.O. Box 1557, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, phone: 573-751-2422, fax: 573-751-5018, website: www.oa.mo.gov/ahc.

Recycled paper

Mr. Chris Harbison Page Two

If you have any questions regarding this permit, please do not hesitate to contact Kathy Kolb, at the Department of Natural Resources' Air Pollution Control Program, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102 or at (573) 751-4817. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM

Susan Heckenk:amp New Source Review Unit Chief

SH:kkj

Enclosures

c: Southeast Regional Office PAMS File: 2018-04-046

Permit Number: 102018-003

Air Pollution Control Program Table of Hazardous Air Pollutants and Screening Model Action Levels

Chemical eAS# SMP.L Group· voe PM• .... • ···• ~Chemical eAS# SMAL Group voe> PM ··. . tons/yr ID . . tons/yr ID .. · ACETALDEHYDE 75-07-0 9 y N CHLOROMETHYL METHYL ETHER 107-30-2 0.1 y N ACETAMIDE 60-35-5 1 y N CHLOROPRENE 126-99-8 1 y N ACETONITRILE 75-05-8 4 y N CHROMIUM NI) COMPOUNDS 0.002 L N y

ACETOPHENONE 98-86-2 1 y N CHROMIUM COMPOUNDS 5 L N y

ACETYLAMINOFLUORINE, [2-] 53-96-3 0.005 V y y CHRYSENE 218-01-9 0.01 V y N ACROLEIN 107-02-8 0.04 y N COBALT COMPOUNDS 0.1 M N y

ACRYLAMIDE 79-06-1 0.02 y N COKE OVEN EMMISIONS 8007-45-2 0.03 N y N ACRYLIC ACID 79-10-7 0.6 y N CRESOL, [META-] 108-39-4 1 B y N ACRYLONITRILE 107-13-1 0.3 y N CRESOL, [ORTHO-] 95-48-7 1 B y N ALL YL CHLORIDE 107-05-1 1 y N CRESOL, [PARA-] 106-44-5 1 B y N AMINOBIPHENYL, [4-J 92-67-1 1 V y N CRESOLS (MIXED ISOMERS) 1319-77-3 1 B y N ANILINE 62-53-3 1 y N CUMENE 98-82-8 10 y N ANISIDINE, [ORTHO-] 90-04-0 1 y N CYANIDE COMPOUNDS 0.1 0 y N ANTHRACENE 120-12-7 0.01 V y N ODE 72-55-9 0.01 V y y

ANTIMONY COMPOUNDS 5 H N y 01(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, (DEHP) 117-81-7 5 y N ANTIMONY PENTAFLUORIDE 7783-70-2 0.1 H N y DIAMINOTOLUENE, [2,4-] 95-80-7 0.02 y N ANTIMONY POTASSIUM TARTRATE 28300-74-5 1 H N y DIAZ OM ETHANE 334-88-3 1 y N ANTIMONY TRIOXIDE 1309-64-4 1 H N y DIBENZ(A, H)ANTHRACENE 53-70-3 0.01 V y N ANTIMONY TRISULFIDE 1345-04-6 0.1 H N y DIOXINS/FU RANS 6E-07 D,V y N ARSENIC COMPOUNDS 0.005 I N y DIBENZOFURAN 132-64-9 5 V y N ASBESTOS 1332-21-4 0 A N y DIBROM0-3-CHLOROPROPANE, [1,2-] 96-12-8 0.01 y N BENZ(A)ANTHRACENE 56-55-3 0.01 V y N DIBROMOETHANE, [1,2-] 106-93-4 0.1 y N BENZENE 71-43-2 2 y N DIBUTYL PHTHALATE 84-74-2 10 y y

BENZIDINE 92-87-5 0.0003 V y N DICHLOROBENZENE, [1,4-] 106-46-7 3 y N BENZO(A)PYRENE 50-32-8 0.01 V y N DICHLOROBENZIDENE, [3,3-] 91-94-1 0.2 V y y

BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE 205-99-2 0.01 V y N DICHLOROETHANE, [1, 1-] 75-34-3 1 y N BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE 207-08-9 0.01 V y N DICHLOROETHANE, [1,2-] 107-06-2 0.8 y N BENZOTRICHLORIDE 98-07-7 0.006 y N DICHLOROETHYLENE, [1, 1-1 75-35-4 0.4 y N BENZYL CHLORIDE 100-44-7 0.1 y N DICHLOROMETHANE 75-09-2 10 N N BERYLLIUM COMPOUNDS 0.008 J N y DICHLOROPHENOXY ACETIC ACID, [2,4-] 94-75-7 10 C y y

BERYLLIUM SAL TS 2E-05 J N y DICHLOROPROPANE, [1 ,2-] 78-87-5 1 y N Bl PHENYL, [1, 1-1 92-52-4 10 V y N DICHLOROPROPENE, [1,3-] 542-75-6 1 y N BIS(CHLOROETHYL)ETHER 111-44-4 0.06 y N DICHLORVOS 62-73-7 0.2 y N BIS(CHLOROMETHYL)ETHER 542-88-1 0.0003 y N DIETHANOLAMINE 111-42-2 5 y N BROMOFORM 75-25-2 10 y N DIETHYL SULFATE 64-67-5 1 y N BROMOMETHANE 74-83-9 10 y N DIETHYLENE GLYCOL MONOBUTYL ETHER 112-34-5 5 p y N BUTADIENE, [1,3-] 106-99-0 0.07 y N DIMETHOXYBENZIDINE, [3,3-] 119-90-4 0.1 V y y

BUTOXYETHANOL ACETATE, [2-] 112-07-2 5 p y N DIMETHYL BENZIDINE, [3,3-J 119-93-7 0.008 V y y

BUTYLENE OXIDE, 11 ,2-1 106-88-7 1 y N DIMETHYL CARBAMOYL CHLORIDE 79-44-7 0.02 y N CADMIUM COMPOUNDS 0.01 K N y DIMETHYL FORMAMIDE 68-12-2 1 y N CALCIUM CYANAMIDE 156-62-7 10 y y DIMETHYL HYDRAZINE, [1,1-J 57-14-7 0.008 y N CAPROLACTAM (Delisted) 105-60-2 DIMETHYL PHTHALATE 131-11-3 10 y N CAPTAN 133-06-2 10 y y DIMETHYL SULFATE 77-78-1 0.1 y N CARBARYL 63-25-2 10 V y y DIMETHYLAMINOAZOBENZENE, [4-] 60-11-7 1 y N CARBON DISULFIDE 75-15-0 1 y N DIMETHYLANILINE, [N-N-] 121-69-7 1 y N CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 56-23-5 1 y N DINITR0-0-CRESOL, [4,6-] (Note 6) 534-52-1 0.1 E y y

CARBONYL SULFIDE 463-58-1 5 y N DINITROPHENOL, [2,4-] 51-28-5 1 y N CATECHOL 120-80-9 5 y N DINITROTOLUENE, [2,4-1 121-14-2 0.02 y N CHLORAMBEN 133-90-4 1 y y DIOXANE, [1,4-1 123-91-1 6 y N CHLORDANE 57-74-9 0.01 y y DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE, [1,2-J 122-66-7 0.09 V y y

CHLORINE 7782-50-5 0.1 N N DIPHENYLMETHANE DIISOCYANATE, [4,4-l 101-68-8 0.1 V y N CHLOROACETIC ACID 79-11-8 0.1 y N EPICHLOROHYDRIN 106-89-8 2 y N CHLOROACETOPHENONE, [2-] 532-27-4 0.06 y N ETHOXYETHANOL, [2-] 110-80-5 10 p y N CHLOROBENZENE 108-90-7 10 y N ETHOXYETHYL ACETATE, [2-] 111-15-9 5 p y N CHLOROBENZILA TE 510-15-6 04 V y y ETHYL ACRYLATE 140-88-5 1 y N CHLOROFORM 67-66-3 0.9 y N ETHYL BENZENE 100-41-4 10 y N

- 17 -

Air Pollution Control Program Table of Hazardous Air Pollutants and Screening Model Action Levels

•. ·.1:t{(;f, ~1:rff~lf ~~: 3···· . &~tiirf [tf }t\~A~ •• r~&~tttt& ri,;;I,.,...... •• ilirir±\ {t:~Mj~r; • ..• " ;;1•~'•3•.,J!);j9.1::~l\''r~1t ('' .· .. · ... ,, .,.,,,,,.,y•t. ,;in\, ./(~,\/}(, l.![~~i;Jiitittiij'h i .... ••~t •••·• ;,;.;l'.•.•·••.if~)} .• ~.f~f::l;iJ[~§j~{'~M~;i;&~li~qprf :<i·vo~•:);'.,}~ritr?· 2;f.i0f';,JJf;ii!0(l}l~:;fr • j Jf}t. '' ';!fv,r ,,, i,c;;, '··.·,,. . .. ,. ',< ::c< 11.:,1,1 .. ,- >,,

ETHYL CHLORIDE 75-00-3 10 y N NITROBENZENE 98-95-3 1 y N ETHYLENE GLYCOL 107-21-1 10 y N NITROBIPHENYL, [4-] 92-93-3 1 V y N ETHYLENE GLYCOL MONO BUTYL ETHER (Delisted) 111-76-2 NITROPHENOL, 14-1 100-02-7 5 y N ETHYLENE GLYCOL MONOHEXYL ETHER 112-25-4 5 p y N NITROPROPANE, [2-] 79-46-9 1 y N ETHYLENE !MINE [AZIRIDINE] 151-56-4 0.003 y N NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE, [N-] 62-75-9 0.001 y N ETHYLENE OXIDE 75-21-8 0.1 y N NITROSOMORPHOLINE, [N-] 59-89-2 1 y N ETHYLENE THIOUREA 96-45-7 0.6 y y NITROSO-N-METHYLUREA, IN-1 684-93-5 0.0002 y N FORMALDEHYDE 50-00-0 2 y N OCTACHLORONAPTHALENE 2234-13-1 0.01 V y N GLYCOL ETHER (ETHYLENE GLYCOL ETHERS) 5 p y N PARATHION 56-38-2 0.1 y y GLYCOL ETHER (DIETHYLENE GLYCOL ETHERS) 5 p y N PCB [POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS] 1336-36-3 0.009 X y y

HEPTACHLOR 76-44-8 0.02 y N PENTACHLORONITROBENZENE 82-68-8 0.3 y N HEXACHLOROBENZENE 118-74-1 0.01 y N PENTACHLOROPHENOL 87-86-5 0.7 y N HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE 87-68-3 0.9 y N PHENOL 108-95-2 0.1 y N HEXACHLOROCYCLOHEXANE, [ALPHA-] 319-84-6 0.01 F y N PHENYLENEDIAMINE, [PARA-] 106-50-3 10 y N HEXACHLOROCYCLOHEXANE, [BETA-] 319-85-7 0.01 F y N PHOSGENE 75-44-5 0.1 y N HEXACHLOROCYCLOHEXANE, [DEL TA-1 319-86-8 0.01 F y N PHOSPHINE 7803-51-2 5 N N HEXACHLOROCYCLOHEXANE, [TECHNICAL] 608-73-1 0.01 F y N PHOSPHOROUS (YELLOW OR WHITE) 7723-14-0 0.1 N N HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE 77-47-4 0.1 y N PHTHALIC ANHYDRIDE 85-44-9 5 y N HEXACHLOROETHANE 67-72-1 5 y N POLYCYLIC ORGANIC MATTER 0.01 V y N HEXAMETHYLENE,-1,6-DIISOCYANATE 822-06-0 0.02 y N PROPANE SUL TONE, [1 ,3-} 1120-71-4 0.03 y y HEXAMETHYLPHOSPHORAMIDE 680-31-9 0.01 y N PROPIOLACTONE, [BETA-} 57-57-8 0.1 y N HEXANE, [N-] 110-54-3 10 y N PROPIONALDEHYDE 123-38-6 5 y N HYDRAZINE 302-01-2 0.004 N N PROPOXUR [BAYGONl 114-26-1 10 y y

HYDROGEN CHLORIDE 7647-01-0 10 N N PROPYLENE OXIDE 75-56-9 5 y N HYDROGEN FLUORIDE 7664-39-3 0.1 N N PROPYLENEIMINE, [1,2-] 75-55-8 0.003 y N HYDROQUINONE 123-31-9 1 y N QUINOLINE 91-22-5 0.006 y N INDEN0(1,2,3CD)PYRENE 193-39-5 0.01 V y N QUINONE 106-51-4 5 y N ISOPHORONE 78-59-1 10 y N RADIONUCLIDES Note 1 y N y

LEAD COMPOUNDS 0.01 Q N y SELENIUM COMPOUNDS 0.1 w N y

LINDANE [GAMMA-HEXACHLOROCYCLOHEXANE} 58-89-9 0.01 F y N STYRENE 100-42-5 1 y N MALEIC ANHYDRIDE 108-31-6 1 y N STYRENE OXIDE 96-09-3 1 y N MANGANESE COMPOUNDS 0.8 R N y TETRACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXIN,[2,3,7,8] 1746-01-6 6E-07 D,V y y MERCURY COMPOUNDS 0.01 s N N TETRACHLOROETHANE, [1, 1,2,2-} 79-34-5 0.3 y N METHANOL 67-56-1 10 y N TETRACHLOROETHYLENE 127-18-4 10 N N METHOXYCHLOR 72-43-5 10 V y y TITANIUM TETRACHLORIDE 7550-45-0 0.1 N N METHOXYETHANOL, [2-} 109-86-4 10 p y N TOLUENE 108-88-3 10 y N METHYL CHLORIDE 74-87-3 10 y N TOLUENE DIISOCYANATE, [2,4-} 584-84-9 0.1 y N METHYL ETHYL KETONE (Delisted) 78-93-3 TOLUIDINE, [ORTHO-] 95-53-4 4 y N METHYL HYDRAZINE 60-34-4 0.06 y N TOXAPHENE 8001-35-2 0.01 y N METHYL IODIDE 74-88-4 1 y N TRICHLOROBENZENE, [1 ,2,4-1 120-82-1 10 y N METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE 108-10-1 10 y N TRICHLOROETHANE, [1, 1, 1-] 71-55-6 10 N N METHYL ISOCYANATE 624-83-9 0.1 y N TRICHLOROETHANE, [1, 1,2-] 79-00-5 1 y N METHYL METHACRYLATE 80-62-6 10 y N TRICHLOROETHYLENE 79-01-6 10 y N METHYL TERT-BUTYL ETHER 1634-04-4 10 y N TRICHLOROPHENOL, [2,4,5-] 95-95-4 1 y N METHYLCYCLCOPENTADIENYL MANGANESE 12108-13-3 0.1 R N y TRICHLOROPHENOL, [2,4,6-] 88-06-2 6 y N METHYLENE BIS(2-CHLOROANILINE), [4,4-] 101-14-4 0.2 V y y TRIETHYLAMINE 121-44-8 10 y N METHYLENEDIANILINE, [4,4-} 101-77-9 1 V y N TRIFLURALIN 1582-09-8 9 y y

METHYLNAPHTHALENE, [2-] 91-57-6 0.01 V y N TRIMETHYLPENTANE, [2,2,4-1 540-84-1 5 y N MINERAL FIBERS 0 T N y URETHANE [ETHYL CARBAMATE] 51-79-6 0.8 y N NAPHTHALENE 91-20-3 10 V y N VINYL ACETATE 108-05-4 1 y N NAPHTHYLAMINE, [ALPHA-] 134-32-7 0.01 V y N VINYL BROMIDE 593-60-2 0.6 y N NAPHTHYLAMINE, [BETA-] 91-59-8 0.01 V y N VINYL CHLORIDE 75-01-4 0.2 y N NICKEL CARBONYL 13463-39-3 0.1 u N y XYLENE, [META-] 108-38-3 10 G y N NICKEL COMPOUNDS 1 u N y I XYLENES (MIXED ISOMERS) 1330-20-7 10 G y N NICKEL REFINERY DUST 0.08 u N y

NICKEL SUBSULFIDE 12035-72-2 0.04 u N y

- 18 -

Air Pollution Control Program MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

Table of Hazardous Air Pollutants and Screening Model Action Levels

Cner:iica1·····.·· cAtti SMA[w Group tons/yr. ID voe :'pM 'Clieni1cal

. . • . l:eQend ·.· .. , ' . . ·•· : .. Group ID

A Asbestos B Cresols/Cresylic Acid (isomers and mixtures) C 2,4 - D, Salts and Esters D Dibenzofurans, Dibenzodioxins E 4, 6 Dinitro-o-cresol, and Salts F Lindane (all isomers) G Xylenes (all isomers and mixtures) H Antimony Compounds I Arsenic Compounds J Beryllium Compounds K Cadmium Compounds L Cliromium Compounds M Cobalt Compounds N Coke Oven Emissions 0 Cyanide Compounds p Glycol Ethers Q Lead Compounds (except elemental Lead) R Manoanese Compounds s Mercury Compounds T Fine Mineral Fibers u Nickel Compounds V Polycyclic Oroanic Matter w Selenium Compounds X Polychlorinated Biohenyls (Aroclors) y Radionuclides

The SMAL for radionuclides is defined as the

Notes effective dose equivalent to 0.3 millirems per year for 7 years exposure associated with a cancer risk of 1 in 1 million

- 19 -

CAS# SMAL Group\ VOC tons/yr ID

PM

Potosi Charcoal, LLC KILN DES!GN PARAMETERS jKiln Volume"' 22 fl wide x 40 fl long x 16' ht= 11,400 CF (Clau:ic MO K!ln Size)

Cadet, MO Plant ID'.

Input: 87 Slab Bundles/ Kilns" 130 tons I kiln 72 hour burns and 96 hour cooling~ 188 hour cycle

221-00xx Oulput: (1:5)., 26 tons Char/kiln 8760/168.,. Cycle,i par year per kHn"' 52 Cycles

Potential to Emit of 8 New Charcoal Kllns on 1 Afterburner

ANNUAL PTE DESCRIPTION THRPUT THRPUT MHOR

CHARCOAL MANUFACTURING OPERATION

EP-01A 30100603 KILNSl1-8 10816 10816

EP-01B 10201002 KILNS #1-8 (Star!-up Fuel) LPG '55 4.66

EP-02 30100606 UNLOAD KILNS 10816 10818

EP-03 30100699 CHARCOAL STORAGE- ACTIVITY 10816 10816

EP-03 30100699 CHARCOAL STORAGE- WINO 1 (){J 1.00

EP-0.:1 30502011 HAUL ROAO 23755 23766

CHARCOAL SCREENING and BAGGING OPERATIONS

ANNUAL PTE DESCRIPTION THRPUT THRPUT

EP-05 / 30100606 I HOPPER {Enclosed Bldg w/ BH} / 10816 I 10816

EP-06 30100606 CONVEYOR (Enclosed Bldg wl BH) 10816

30100606 FEEDER (Enclosed Bldg wl BH) 10618

EP-08 30100606 SCREEN (Enclosed Bldg wl SH) 10818 10816

30100606 CONVEYOR {Enclo!Sed Bldg wl SH) 10816

EP-10 30100606 CONVEYOR (Enclo$l!O Bldg wl BH) 10816

EP-11 30100608 TRUCK LOAOOUTS 10816

30100606 HOPPER (Enclosed Bldg w/ SH) 6653

30100606 CONVEYOR (Enclosed Bldg wl BH 8653 ""' E?-14 30100606 BAGGER (Enclosed Bklg wl SH) 8653 8663

EnclcsBd Bldg Wf BH I• und111 negative pressure rorduatcapture efffor98%

letPM2.5•PM10cr

1235

0022

1235

1235

1000

2712

MHDR

1235

1235

1235

1235

osaa

0988

1235

0988

"" 0986

MHOR UNITS

Tona/hr

1D"Gallor,s

Tonslhr

Tons/hr

Acres

VMT

MHOR UNITS

Tons/hr

Tons/hr

Ton!llln

Tons/hr

Tonslhr

Tons/hr

TomVhr

Tons/hr

Tons/hr

Tons/ht

HOURS

8760

104

'"" 8760

876{)

8760

HOURS

8780

8760

8760

8760

8760

8760

8760

8760

8760

8780

lat PM2.5 .. 0.52 PM10 by tlltio of 16131 from Coal Cleaning. D,y Process from AP.-42 Appendix page 8.1-51

PM10 EF

61 00

070

00120

0071

2986

2m

PM10 EF

018

018

018

0.12

018

018

018

0.18

018

"'

PM10 EF UNITS

lbsfton

LbsJ103 Gal

Lbs/ton

lbs/1.on

lbs/Acre

Lbs/VMT

PM10EF UNITS

Lbs/ton

Lb,'lfton

lbl!iton

Lbs/ton

lbs/1011

LbsJlon

lbi</t,in

Lbsfton

Lbs/too

lbs/ton

PM10 EF SOURCE

MoDNR_APCP _EIQ

McDNR_APCP_E!Q

305()2005

F2.8-SeeTab

F2.8-SeeTab

F2.7,SaeTab

ParAPCP E!QSect!on

PM10EF SOURCE

30501607

30501607

30501607

3050-1611

30501607

30501607

30501607

30501607

30501607

30501607

RouiedThruAB

RoutedThruAB

AB "Aflarburner

Cairtur~ Efficiency

0.88

o.as

098

0.98

0"8

0.98,

000

0.88

•· 0.9B

0.98

3klln•burningw!lhslaggeredslartup

Total Production= 8 kiln• x62 cycles x 28 Ions=

SOX

PM10 COeff

PTE PM10 EMISSION TPY FACTOR

10CSR10~330

9800 6.60

000 I o.oo

00

0 0.38

0 0.01

9<J 5.72

12.77

SOX PM10 PTE PM10 EMISSION CO elf TPY FACTOR

995

995

'" 995 I 0.02

995 I 0.02

'" 00

'" 995

995

All Sources PM10 WithControl 13.928

SOX

TPY

~

SOX

TPY

000

000

000

000

000

000

000

0.00

000

000

SOX

~

The EF source for the Kilns Emission Factors 1s MoONR_APCP _EIQ which was nagoc:ialad wilh the Mo Charcoal Industry

andftomtheRoyafOakTerres',taKHn TestingofJune 11-14.1996

The CO Effforthe kilns1s derived from 10CSR 10-6330· Lim•! ra!ax8760 his/ Production Maximum per Yr"' l1m1t TPY

NOX NOX NOX voe voe EMISSION CONTROL TPY EMISSION CONTROL FACTOR EFFIC FACTOR EFFIC

5.00 145

003

~

NOX NOX NOX voe voe EM!SS!ON CONTROL TPY EMISSION CONTROL FACTOR EFFIC FACTOR EFFIC

000

000

000

000

000

000

000

000

000

000

voe TPY

078

000

~

voe TPY

000

000

000

000

000

000

000

000

000

000

co co EMISSION CONTROL FACTOR EFFIC

290 9'50

75 000

co co EMISSION CONTROL FACTOR EFFIC

co TPY

002

~

co TPY

000

000

000

000

HAPS HAPS HAPS Tot;;,! EMISSION CONTROL TPY Emi.sins FACTOR EFFIC TPY

Methanol is a HAP and voe

150.0 99.93

000

Haps TPY must be less than VOC

HAPS voe HAPS Total EMISSION CONTROL TPY Em1ssins FACTOR EFFIC TPY

038

036

741

NOX voe co HAPs Total IPM25

.....£.£_ ~ 0.57 50.21 857

Form 2.7 Information - Haul Road Emissions Units

Length Road Traveled 0.8 Miles Silt Content 8.3 % Surface Material Gravel Rain Days 105 Days

Dust Control - Spray Doc 90 % PM2.5 74 % Haul Truck Information EP-4

Vechile 1 - Slabs Feedstock Make: Various Semi Truck Unloaded Truck Weight 17.0 Load Material Weight 27.0 Ave Loaded Weight 44.0

Vechile 2 - Loaders Make: Deere 444 Unloaded Truck Weight 13.5 Load Material Weight 1.5 Ave Loaded Weight 15.0

Vechile 3 - Char Product Out Make: Various Semi Truck Unloaded Truck Weight 17.0 Load Material Weight 25.0 Ave Loaded Weight 42.0

4. CALCULATION OF ANNUAL VEHICLES MILES TRAVELED A.M<U.I\LVMT I Ann11a• VMT a

2 .. (length of road) " (Annual amount hauled)

;Ave1ag8 weight of material per load\

5. CALCULATION OF HAUL ROAD UNCONTROLLED EMISSION FACTOR

PM2 ., Emission Factor S1 1t Contf'nt "-'o 1 OQ(k>d truck we,ghl rtorisi 365 Days o! Rain f j 09 [ Ueload<xJt,ack=,g••l· J 045 t JI"'· fVlS<>OSC,OTOR

0.15 X X X

12 6 365

Silt Con!erit ~<> Llriloaded buck weigh!+ C.45 365 0flY~ wl Rul!l [ j 09 (. J L j \?M ,EM•SSION FAcfiw

PM1c, Emrss1on Factor I 1.S x 12 x Loaood!rJc;,·•e,gf'lUtonsi x 365

Distance 75% Dist: Annual VMT , 2.0 0.8 54080 25

PM10 = 1.5 0.718 2.84 1.000 PM2.5 0.15 0.718 2.84 1.000

25% Dist: Annual VMT , 2.0 54080 1.5 PM10 = 1.5 0.718 2.02 1.000 PM2.5 0.15 0.718 2.02 1.000

100% Dist: Annual VMT , 2.0 0.8 10816 25 PM10 = 1.5 0.718 2.80 1.000 PM2.5 0.15 0.718 2.80 1.000

Use Highest Values I 2.18 PM10EF 0.22 PM2.5 EF

Weighting VMT Cales 3461 3.06 PM10 18027

692 . 3.01

I VMT

3461 3.06 0.31

I 18027

0.22

692 3.01 0.30

10579 39122 2084

51786 2.18

23755 I

VMT PM10 EF PM2.5 EF

VMT PM10 EF PM2.5 EF

VMT PM10 EF PM2.5 EF

' VMT*EF

10579.020 1057.902

39122.444 3912.244

2084.301 208.430

uncontrolled tons controlled w/ BMPs

5.290 0.529

19.561 1.956

1.042 0.104

0.529 PM10 0.138 PM2.5

5.086 PM10 0.196 PM2.5

0.104 PM10 0.0271 PM2.5

0.360 PM2.5 5.719 PM 10 TPY

Potosi Charcoal, LLC KILN DESIGN PARAMETERS IKllnVolume• 22 ft wide x40 ft long x:16' ht• 11,400CF (Claulc MO KIin Size)

Cadet, MO Input: 87 Stab B1mdles I KIins • 130 Iona/ kiln 72 hour burns and 9B hour cc,ojlng = 188 hour cycle 3 kllns bumlng wllh daggerad startup The EF source fmlha Kiln• Emission F&dors is MoDNR_APCP_EIQ which was negociated wrth the Mo Charcoal h1dustry PlantlDI 221-00xx Output:{1:8)•2111onaChar/kUn 87801188 • Cycles perysar par kiln .. 52 Cyelea Tota!Productlor,• 8 kl!ns x52cyclesx28 tons., 10816 TPY and from Iha Roya! Oak Temtsita KIin Tasting of June 11·14, 1996

The CO Efffarthekllnsi•derived from 10CSR 10-8330· Umltratax8780hrsl Production Maximum per Yr'" Limit TPY Potential to Emit of 8 New Charcoal Kilns on 1 Afterburner

SOX SOX NOX NOX NOX voe voe voe co co co HAPS HAPS HAPS Total PM ANNUAL PTE MHDR PM10 PM10EF PM10EF PM10 PTE PM10 EMISSION TPY EMISSION CONTROL TPY EMISSION CONTROL TPY EMISSION CONTROL TPY EMISSION CONTROL TPY EmlHIM 250

EP-# sec DESCRIPTION THRPUT THRPUT MHOR UNITS HOURS EF UNITS SOURCE CDeff TPY FACTOR FACTOR EFFIC FACTOR EFFIC FACTOR EFFIC FACTOR EFFIC TPY TPY

CHARCOAL MAHUFACTURINQ OPERATION 10CSR10-8330 MlrlhanoJ is a HAP and voe

EP-01A 30100603 KILNS#1-8 10816 10616 1.235 T011llhr 8Ttl0 8100 Lbaiton MoDNR_APCP_EIQ RoutNThruAB 9800 6.60 000 6.00 2704 ,., 9990 078 '" 99.50 764 1SO.O 99.03 057 600

EP-010 10201002 KILNS #1-8 (start-up Fuel) LPG 455 .... 0022 1a3Gal!ons 104 070 lba/1a3Gai MoONR_APCP _EIQ RoutNThruAB 0.00 0.00 000 1'00 0.03 000 000 75 0.00 002 000 000

EP-02 301()0606 UNLOAD KILNS 10816 10818 1.235 Tons/hf BTOO 00120 """''" 30502005 00 0.06 006

EP-03 30100699 CHARCOAL STORAGE- ACTIVITY 10816 10816 1235 Tona/hr BTOO 0.071 ,,_ F2.8·SeeTab 0 0.36 0.36

EP-03 30100099 CHARCOAL STORAGE- WINO 1.00 1.00 1.000 "'" BTOO 29.96 U,,,Ac,o F2.8-SoaTab 0 0.01 0.01

EP-04 30502011 HAUL ROAD 23755 237611 2712 VMT BTOO 2.177 lb,1\/MT F2.7-SeeTab 90 6.72 0.36

ABaAfterbumaf 12.77 0.00 27.07 0.78 "' 0.67 4ll.0S 741

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Haps TPY mud be less than voe

CHARCOAL l'JCREENINQ and BAQQINO OPERATIONS PerAPCP EIQSect!on SOX SOX NOX NOX NOX voe voe voe co co co HAPS voe HAPS T°"I

ANNUAL PTE MHOR PM10 PM1DEF PM10EF PM10 PTE PM10 EMISSION TPY EMISSION CONTROL TPY EMISSION CONTROL TPY EMISSION CONTROL TPY EMISSION CONTROL TPY Emlulns EP-# sec DESCRIPTION THRPUT THRPUT MHDR UNITS HOURS EF UNITS SOURCE Caohtre EfflckVICY COeff TPY FACTOR FACTOR EFFIC FACTOR EFFlC FACTOR EFFIC FACTOR EFFIC TPY

EP-05 30100606 HOPPER (Enclosed Bldg w1 BH) 10816 10618 1.235 Tona/hf STOO 018 ,,_ 30501007 f ,'OJl8: , 995 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

EP-06 30100606 CONVEYOR (EnclQled Bldg w/ BH) 10816 10816 1235 Tons/hf BTOO 018 Lbaiton 30501007 I ,:.~-~ 995 0.00 0.00 000 0.00

EP-07 301()0tl06 FEEDER (Enclosed Bjdg wl SH) 10818 10816 1235 Tona/hr BTOO 0.18 '""'' 30501807 L Ji~ 995 0.02 0.00 000 000 0.00

EP-Q8 30100608 SCREEN (Encla&ed Bldg w/ BH) 10816 10816 1235 Ton&/hf STOO •JI!"~ ,...,.,,, ,.,. ___ ~.!RJ 995 0.02 0.00 000 0.00 0.00

EP-00 30100606 CONVEYOR (Enclosed Bldg wl BH) 10816 10816 0.986 Tons/hr 8700 018 u.n~ 30501607 > .. : ...... 995 0.00 000 000 000

EP-10 30100606 CONVEYOR (EnclOHd Bldg w1 BH) 10816 10816 0988 Tons/lu" BTOO 018 Lba/ton 30501607 "a.sq··< 99.5 0.02 000 0.00 0.00 000

EP-11 30100606 TRUCK LOAOOUTS 10616 10816 1235 Tons/hr BTOO 018 '""""' 30501807 0.00 0.0 0.87 0.00 000 0.00 000

EP-12 30100606 HOPPER (Enclood 01dg w/ BH) SS53 "" 0986 To"""' BTOO 0.16 Lbaiton 30501807 -~--.~ 995 0.02 0.00 0.00 000 0.00

EP-13 30100606 CONVEYOR (Enclosed Bldg w1 BH SS53 "" 0.986 T_, 6760 0.16 ,...,.,,, 30501607 · ·o-.Dll_ ·· 995 0.02 0.00 000 0.00 o.oo

EP-14 30100608 BAGGER (Enclosed Bldg wl BH) 6653 '"' 0986 Tons/hr 8700 018 Lbaitan 30501607 0,88_ ~- 995 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1.16

Enck!Nd Bldg wJ BH !1 u~ n.g.U.... pr.aura far dust capture dlar ~ AIISourc .. 1:~!~-1 [;o ~ [X] ~ r~~-~~PM2.5857

.

WlthCorrtrol 0 . Lal PM2!5 • PU10ar latPM25•0.52 PM10byratioof 16131 hmCalllCl..iing: DryProca.hmN42Appand1J1pag181-S1

Form 2.8 Information - Storage Pile Emissions

EP-3 Moisture Content Silt Content Area of Pile

Storage Duration Annual Amount Store( Max Hourly Amount Loader In - Loader Out

Mean Wind Speed Day Days % of Time Wind> 12 Veh Act Factor

0.7 1.6

0.25

14 4326 0.50

10 260 32 1.0

Units % %

Acres

Days Tons Tons

MPH Days

38

3A

%

4. STORAGE PILE EMISSION FACTOR CALCULATIONS

CALCULATION FORMULA

[3A 1] Load In - Load Out

Comporient [!b 0 lon1

[3-A 2] Veh,cie Activity Component

'ton)

0_0032 x x (Mean wind

[Silt

[3-A-3, Activity PM10

Emis:;1011 Facto, 1ib. ton1

[3-A-1j Load In Cornpunent ~

["3-8) Wind Erosion PM10

Em1ss1on Factor ilb. acre-yr.I

Wind Erosion PM10 EF =

Activity PM10 Combined

0.85 x (Siit contenl ~;, 1 x timHw1nd '.,1 MPH 151

0.85 1.07

A1 Load In & Out PM10 = 0.0032 0.35 1.07 A2 Vehicle Act PM10 = 0.05

A3

14

2.462 1.106

Uv101sture cont0nt 21 ~i 4

Ad:.;ity

pH!

1.11 2.13

0.230 1.0

RESULT

FActc•

29.96 PM10 Efw!

0.0120 PM10 EF 0.0590 PM10 EF 0.0710 PM10 Efa

POTOSICHARCOALLLC-CADET,MO

The emission factors and MHDR were derived from charcoal facilit design parameters

Kiln Volume = Same Size as the Classic Mo Kiln Size at the Royal Oak and Packaging Service Facilities 10816 tons charcoal/8760 hours =1.235 tons/hr

The tested emission rates were as follow:

Pollutant

Emission Potential Rate (lb/hr) Emissions

Pollutant Emission MHOR Controlled {tons/vr) Uncontrolle I d lb/hr PTE UC

Methanol 150 1.235 0.12968 0.57 185 811 POM 0.0095 1.235 1.1733E-05 0.00005 0.0117 0.051 HAP {combination of Methane 1.235 1.2969E-01 0.57 0 0 Methane 110 1.235 0.13585 0.60 136 595 CO2 1000.14 1.235 9844.93 1235 5410 llliiiiiidestroyed in a Thermal Oxidizer GHG(mass) 9845.93 GHGe 9869.93

The Methanol factor is from AP-42, Table 10.7-2. the control efficieny for the methanol can be assume to equal the VOC control efficency established in the testing, which is 99.0% POM emission factor of 0.0095 is from AP-42 Table 10.7-2, September 1995 CO2 emission was calculated from the stack test emissions for other testing Ethane is a VOC and was counted in the VOC stack test emissions. Therefore, Ethane was not calculated.

1820.000 lb CO2/ton 1.24 tons/hr x

9844.93 9844.93

CO2

+ 1.0000 + 25( 1.0000

Methane

8760/2000=

9846 GHG(mass) 9869.93 GHGe

9845 tons/yr CO2

Greenhouse Gases Calculations Both of these Afterburners were designs by David Seidel , PE - BOE

Ea= Cax Mwx. ml/m3 = ppmV

CO2 Emissions Ea Ca Mw Qs lb/hr ml/m3 g/g-mol g-mol/L lb/g L/mL ft3/min m3/ft3 min/hr

GoldStar Charcoal AB#1 1570.5 98900 44 1 1 1 2318 1 60

2/13/2007 1 1 24.06 453.6 1000.0 1 35.31 1

Ea= Cax Mwx .. ml/m3= ppmV

CO2 Emissions Ea Ca Mw Qs lb/hr ml/m3 g/g-mol g-mol/L lb/g L/ml ft3/min m3/ft3 min/hr

Packaging Service AB#2 1672.5 79600 44 1 1 1 3067 1 60

11/4/2011 1 1 24.06 453.6 1000.0 1 35.31 1

The

CHARCOAL 1<JLN

PM,o

NO,

voe

co

lliL!rul

61

290

to use for your 2002 Elnisswn [7J:

have any questions, contact the Air PoJJutwn Control Prograxn, Support Section at(573) 751-4817

Limits by Rule 1 o CSR 10-6.330

AB Limits Lbs/Hr Hours

PM 1.50 8760 voe 0.24 8760 co 1.75 8760

Opacity% 10

Emissions Required CD Elf

TPY EF Tons Char TPY To Meet Rule

6.57 61.00 10816 329.89 '"'oTao 1.05 145.00 10816 784.16 0.999 7.67 290.00 10816 1568.32 0.995

MHDR MHDR Emission Emission Emission Description (MMBtu/ (1000 gal Pollutant HAP? Unit Point hr\ / hr\

Factor

0.957 0.010459 PM 0.2 PM10 0.7

Propane Sulfur Content (grains / PM2.5 0.7 100 cubic fl) SOX 1.5

15 I NOX 13 voe 0.513 co 7.5

Pronane HHV IMMBtu / 1000 aa/l HAPS 1.888 POM aaareaate arouo 6.98E-04

91.5 porn 2-Methvlnaohthalene V 2.40E-05 porn 3-Methvlchloranthrene V 1.80E-06 porn 7, 12-Dimethvlbenzanthracene V 1.60E-05 porn Acenaohthene V 1.SOE-06 porn Acenaohthvlene V 1.80E-06 porn Anthracene V 2.400E-06 porn Benzanthracene V 1.SOE-06

Benzene V 2.10E-03 porn Benzo alovrene V 1.20E-06 porn Benzo b)fluoranthene V 1.SOE-06 porn Benzo Q,h,i)pervlene V 1.20E-06 porn Benzo, k)fluoranthene V 1.SOE-06

Butane 2.10E+OO porn Chrvsene V 1.80E-06 porn Di benzo/ a, h )anthracene V 1.20E-06

Dichlorobenzene V 1.20E-03 Ethane 3.10E+OO

porn Fluoranthene V 3.00E-06 porn Fluorene V 2.SOE-06

Formaldehyde V 7.50E-02 Hexane V 1.80E+OO

porn lndeno/1,2,3-cdJDvrene V 1.80E-06 porn Naohthalene V 6.10E-04

Pentane 2.60E+OO porn Phenanathrene V 1.70E-05

Propane 1.60E+OO porn Pvrene V 5.00E-06

Toluene V 3.40E-03 Arsenic V 2.00E-04 Barium 4.40E-03 Bervllium V 1.20E-05 Cadmium V 1.10E-03 Chromium V 1.40E-03 Cobalt V 8.40E-05 Coooer 8.SOE-04 Manaanese V 3.SOE-04 Mercurv V 2.60E-04 Molvbdenum 1.10E-03 Nickel V 2.10E-03 Selenium V 2.40E-05

100yr GWP 40 CFR 98 Table A-1, Jan 1 Vanadium 2.30E-03 2014 Zinc 2.90E-02

CO2 I 1 CO2 12500 CH4 25 Methane 0.2 N20 298 N20 0.9

GHG mass GHG C02e

2 heaters each rated at 5,000 btu/hr •voe and HAP emission factors assumed same as for natural gas combustion.

Available Emission Emission Factor Control Capture

Pollutant Factor Units Source

llb/hr\ Device Efficiency

0.00209 none 0% 0.00732 none 0%

sec 1-03-010-02 0.00732 none 0% lb/ 1,000 gal 0.01569 none 0%

0.13597 none 0% . 0.00537 none 0% sec 1-03-010-02 0.07844 none 0%

1.77E-03 none 0% 6.55E-07 none 0% 2.25E-08 none 0% 1.69E-09 none 0% 1.SOE-08 none 0% 1.69E-09 none 0% 1.69E-09 none 0% 2.25E-09 none 0% 1.69E-09 none 0% 1.97E-06 none 0% 1.13E-09 none 0% 1.69E-09 none 0% 1.13E-09 none 0% 1.69E-09 none 0% 1.97E-03 none 0% 1.69E-09 none 0% 1.13E-09 none 0% 1.13E-06 none 0% 2.91E-03 none 0%

1-02-006-02 2.81E-09 none QOJo

industrial boiler, 2.63E-09 none 0%

lb/ MMCF natural gas, 10-7.04E-05 none 0%

100MMBtu and 1-02 1.69E-03 none 0%

006-03 < 10MMB!u 1.69E-09 none 0% 5.72E-07 none 0% 2.439E-03 none 0% 1.60E-08 none 0% 1.50E-03 none 0% 4.69E-09 none 0% 3.19E-06 none 0% 1.88E-07 none 0% 4.13E-06 none 0% 1.13E-08 none 0% 1.03E-06 none 0% 1.31E-06 none 0% 7.88E-08 none 0% 7.98E-07 none 0% 3.57E-07 none 0% 2.44E-07 none 0% 1.03E-06 none 0% 1.97E-06 none 0% 2.25E-08 none 0% 2.16E-06 none 0% 2.72E-05 none 0%

130.73770 none 0% lb/ 1,000 ga sec 1-03-010-02 0.00209 none 0%

0.00941 none 0%

Copy of Flexo Press Emission Cales 2018-04-06 v2.1.xlsx

Propane Boiler

Overall Controlled Control

Removal Emissions Efficiency

Efficiencv /lb/hr\ 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0

-8/7/2018

1 of 2 -b

PTE (lb/hr)

0.00209 0.00732 0.00732 0.01569 0.13597 0.00537 0.07844 1.77E-03 6.55E-07 2.25E-08 1.69E-09 1.SOE-08 1.69E-09 1.69E-09 2.25E-09 1.69E-09 1.97E-06 1.13E-09 1.69E-09 1.13E-09 1.69E-09 1.97E-03 1.69E-09 1.13E-09 1.13E-06 2.91E-03 2.81E-09 2.63E-09 7.037E-05 1.69E-03 1.69E-09 5.72E-07 2.44E-03 1.60E-08 1.50E-03 4.69E-09 3.19E-06 1.88E-07 4.13E-06 1.13E-08 1.03E-06 1.31E-06 7.88E-08 7.98E-07 3.57E-07 2.44E-07 1.03E-06 1.97E-06 2.25E-08 2.16E-06 2.72E-05

130.73770 0.00209 0.00941

PTE (tpy)

9.16E-03 3.21E-02 3.21E-02 6.87E-02 5.96E-01 2.35E-02 3.44E-01 7.76E-03 2.87E-06 9.86E-08 7.40E-09 6.58E-08 7.40E-09 7.40E-09 9.86E-09 7.40E-09 8.63E-06 4.93E-09 7.40E-09 4.93E-09 7.40E-09

8.630E-03 7.40E-09 4.93E-09 4.93E-06 1.27E-02 1.23E-08 1.15E-08 3.08E-04 7.40E-03 7.40E-09 2.51E-06 1.0?E-02 6.99E-08 6.58E-03 2.0SE-08 1.40E-05 8.22E-07 1.81E-05 4.93E-08 4.52E-06 5.75E-06 3.45E-07 3.49E-06 1.56E-06 1.07E-06 4.52E-06 8.63E-06 986E-08 9.45E-06 119E-04 572.63

9.16E-03 4 12E-02 572.68 585.15

Copy of Flexo Press Emission Cales 2018-04-06 v2.1.xlsx

Propane Boiler

8/7/2018 Page 2 of 2