Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

47
Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Transcript of Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Page 1: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Mission Aircrew Course

Search Planning and Coverage(APR 2010)

Page 2: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

O-2004 USE A POD TABLE (P) P-2021 DISCUSS HOW ATMOSPHERIC AND

LIGHTING CONDITIONS AFFECT SCANNING EFFECTIVENESS (S)

P-2025 DISCUSS COMMON SEARCH TERMS (S)

P-2026 IDENTIFY WHAT TO LOOK FOR AND RECORD DURING DAMAGE ASSESSMENT MISSIONS (S)

Aircrew Tasks

Page 3: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

In basic terms, discuss how search planners determine the Maximum Area of Probability and then the Probability Area.

Given a POD table, discuss the advantages and disadvantages of various search altitudes and speeds over the three major types of terrain.

Discuss the importance of proper execution of search patterns.

Objectives

Page 4: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Optional – Review POD Example

Objectives

Page 5: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Define the following search terms:• Ground and Search Track• Maximum Area of Possibility• Meteorological and Search Visibility• Probability Area• Probability of Detection (POD)• Scanning Range• Search Altitude• Track spacing (S)

Objectives

Page 6: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Discuss how a disaster can effect CAP operations.

Discuss the types of questions you must always be asking yourself during damage assessment missions.

List typical things you are looking for during a damage assessment mission.

List the information you should obtain when over a damage assessment site.

Discuss the limitations of an air search for a missing person.

Objectives (Con’t)

Page 7: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Ground track is an imaginary line on the ground that is made by an aircraft’s flight path over the ground

Maximum Area of Possibility is normally a circular area centered at the search objective’s last know position, with certain corrections

Meteorological visibility is the maximum distance at which large objects (e.g., a mountain) can be seen

Search Terms

Page 8: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Probability Area is a smaller area, within the maximum area of possibility, where there is an increased likelihood of locating the search objective

Probability of Detection (POD) is the likelihood, expressed in percent, that a search airplane might locate the objective

Scanning range is the lateral distance from a scanner’s aircraft to an imaginary line on the ground, parallel to the ground track, that a scanner is expected to have a good chance at spotting the search objective

Search Terms

Page 9: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Search Altitude is the altitude the aircraft will fly above the ground (AGL)

Search track is an imaginary swath across the surface formed by the scanning range and the length of the aircraft’s ground track

Search visibility is the distance at which an object on the ground can be seen and recognized from a particular height

Track Spacing (S) is the distance between adjacent visual or electronic search legs

Search Terms

Page 10: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Narrowing the Search

Search Involves• Estimating the position of the wreck or

survivors• Determining the area to be searched• Selecting the search techniques to be used

Maximum Possibility Area• Circle around the Last Known Position (LKP)• The radius is equal to the endurance of the

aircraft• Correct for wind

Probability Area• Where is the aircraft likely to be

Page 11: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Search Altitudes & Airspeed

Altitudes• Maintain a minimum of 1000 feet above the ground,

water, or any obstruction within a 1000' radius during daylight hours, and a minimum of 2000' AGL at night (except for takeoff and landing). [Refer to CAPR 60-1 for special restrictions for over-water missions.]

• For SAR/DR/CD/HLS reconnaissance, the pilot will maintain at least 1000 AGL.

• Pilots may descend below the designated search altitude to attempt to positively identify the target (but never below 500 AGL or within 500 feet of any obstructions within a 1000' radius); once the target has been identified the pilot will return to 1000' AGL or higher.

Airspeed• No lower than Vx

Page 12: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Search Factors

Factors which effect detection• Weather; terrain; lighting conditions• Sweep Width (W)• Track Spacing (S)• Coverage Factor (C)• Probability of Detection (P)

Determine factors for search area coverage• Type and number of aircraft available• Search visibility

Probability Of Detection (POD)

Page 13: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Determining the Maximum Possibility

Area

LKP

Corrected for wind

Wind vector

No wind endurance

Maximum possibility area

Flight level winds: 330/20

Aircraft Speed: 100 Kts

Endurance: 2 Hours

200 NM

40NM

Page 14: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Probability Area

Where was the last point where RADAR had the aircraft identified?

Is there an ELT? Was there a flight plan (even if not on

file with the FAA)? Dead reckoning from LKP and heading Reports of sightings

• Other aircraft• People living along the intended route of flight

Page 15: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Narrowing the

Probability Area

Flight plan Weather information National Track Analysis Program data Airports along the intended flight track Aircraft performance Pilots flying habits Radar coverage as a limiting factor Nature of terrain along the flight track Position reports — fuel stops, etc. Most likely within 5 miles of intended

track

Page 16: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Search Priorities

Areas of bad weather Low clouds and poor visibility Areas where weather was not as

forecast High terrain Areas not covered by radar Reports of low flying aircraft Survival factors Radio contacts or MAYDAY calls

Page 17: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Probability of Detection (POD)

POD expressed as a “percent” search object was detected

Four interrelated factors used to calculate:• Track Spacing• Search Visibility• Search Altitude• Type of Terrain

Cumulative POD calculated using a chart

“Effectiveness” must also be considered

Page 18: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

POD Table

Page 19: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

POD Chart - detail

500 Feet  

0.5 nm 35% 60% 75% 75%

1.0 20 35 50

1.5 15 25 35 40

700 Feet  

0.5 nm 40% 60% 75% 80%

1.0 20 35 50 55

1.5 15 25 40 40

1,000 Feet  

0.5 nm 40% 65% 80% 85%

1.0 25 40 55

1.5 15 30 40 45

OPEN, FLAT TERRAIN  

SEARCH ALTITUDE (AGL) Track Spacing

SEARCH VISIBILITY  1 mi 2 mi 3 mi 4 mi

50

2.0 10 20 30 30

2.0 10 20 30 35

60

2.0 15 20 30 35

Page 20: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Cumulative POD Chart

5-10% 1511-20% 20 2521-30% 30 35 4531-40% 40 45 50 6041-50% 50 55 60 65 7051-60% 60 65 65 70 75 8061-70% 70 70 75 80 80 85 9071-80% 80 80 80 85 85 90 90 95

80+% 85 85 90 90 90 95 95 95 95+5-10%11-20%21-30%31-40%41-50%51-60%61-70%71-80%

80+%POD For This Search

PreviousPOD

Page 21: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

QUESTIONS?

Page 22: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Natural and man-made Examples of CAP services:

• Air and ground SAR services• Air and ground visual and/or video

imaging• Flood boundary determination• Air and ground transportation• Courier flights• Radio communications support

Disaster Assessment

Page 23: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Effects of extreme weather Physical landscape may be so altered as to

make maps obsolete or make navigation difficult

Damage or destruction of area infrastructure Effects of biological, chemical or radiological

terrorism (or accidental release)

How Disasters Can Affect CAP Operations

Page 24: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Flying damage assessment sorties is not much different from our SAR search patterns

The big difference is what you look for Should be asking questions such as:

• What is the geographical extent and severity of the damage?

• Is the damage spreading? If so, how far and how fast?• How has access/egress been affected?• What are the primary and secondary hazards?• Is the disaster threatening critical structures or areas?• Have utilities been affected or are they threatened?• Can you see alternatives to problems?

Assessment

Page 25: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Some specific things to be looking for are:• Breaks in pavement, railways, bridges, dams,

levees, pipelines, runways and structures• Roads/streets blocked by water, debris or

landslide• Downed power lines• Ruptured water lines• Motorists in distress or major accidents• Alternate routes for emergency vehicles or

evacuation• Distress signals from survivors

Assessment

Page 26: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

At each site, besides sketching or highlighting the extent of the damage and identifying access and egress routes, you should record:• Latitude and longitude• Description• Type and extent of damage• Photo number, or time reference for videotape• Status and trends

Assessment

Page 27: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Aerial survey of WTC

Page 28: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Aerial survey of WTC

Page 29: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Aerial survey of WTC

Page 30: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Aerial survey of WTC

Page 31: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Aerial survey of WTC

Page 32: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Aerial survey of WTC

Page 33: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Aerial survey of WTC

Page 34: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Flooding over levee

Page 35: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Seeping behind levee

Page 36: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Flooded approach

Page 37: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Bridge damage

Page 38: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Tornado

Page 39: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Tornado

Page 40: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Tornado leaves slabs

Page 41: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Close-up of tornado damage

Page 42: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Wide image of train wreck

ChemicaChemical spill l spill

(hazmat(hazmat))

Page 43: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Close image of train wreck

Page 44: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Close image of train wreck

Page 45: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Infrared image of train wreck

Page 46: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Plume from train wreck

Page 47: Mission Aircrew Course Search Planning and Coverage (APR 2010)

Questions?Questions?