MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE SCREENING COMMITTEE...
Transcript of MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE SCREENING COMMITTEE...
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE SCREENING COMMITTEE HELD ON 28TH FEBRUARY 2012 TO CONSIDER NEW PROJECT PROPOSALS UNDER THE SCHEME OF INTEGRATED PROGRAMME FOR OLDER PERSONS (IPOP).
A meeting of the Screening Committee of Social Defence Bureau of the
Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment was held on 28th February, 2012 under the Chairmanship of Shri T.R. Meena, Joint Secretary (Social Defence) to scrutinize and make recommendation on the new proposals of NGOs received through State Governments/Union Territories under the Scheme of Integrated Programme for Older Persons (IPOP). Shri M.M. Sabharwal from Helpage India, Fr. Joe Pereira from Kripa Foundation, and Shri T.V.A. Ram, Deputy Secretary (IFD) in the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, Department of Social Justice & Empowerment, Members of the Committee, attended the meeting. Shri Lalsanglur, Director (SD), Shri J.K. Sahu, Under Secretary (Ageing) and Shri Budharattan, Section Officer (Ageing) were present in the meeting to assist the Committee in the scrutiny of the proposals during the meeting.
2. At the outset, the Members of the Screening Committee were briefed about the budget allocation for 2011-12 and the notional allocation fixed for the States/UTs for 2011-12, existing guideline of the Ministry issued vide Order No.1-31/2006-Cdn dated 05.09.2008, the norms and guidelines of the Scheme, and number of new proposals received after the last Screening Committee held on 14th June 2011, etc.
3. The Committee, in the first instant, has observed that requirement of the current year recommendations of the State/UT Grants-in-aid Committees along with inspection reports for the current year for new project proposals is a hindrance for the organizations to be able to receive grant under the Scheme, as the recommendations of the State/UT Governments are received in the Ministry very late and thereafter a considerable time is required for examining the proposals. The Committee, therefore, recommends that grant-in-aid to the new organizations should be considered on the basis of available recommendations and inspection reports of the State/UT Governments. Accordingly, the Committee recommended that guidelines contained in the Ministry’s Office Order No.1-31/2006-Cdn dated 05.09.2008 may be suitably amended, if it is found feasible.
4. The Committee decided to defer consideration of the new proposals of NGOs received from the States of Goa, Punjab, Manipur, Uttar Pradesh and Uttrakhand keeping in view the imposition of election code of conduct due to forthcoming Legislative Assembly elections.
5. The Committee also decided to give priority to the proposals received from un-served/under-served States/Districts, followed by innovative projects in the revised Scheme of IPOP which has been implemented w.e.f 1.4.2008, while considering the project proposals for recommendations, subject to fulfillment of other requirements of the scheme and availability of funds.
6. The Committee, during examination of the proposals, observed that a large number of new proposals recommended by the State Government were incomplete
in many respects and therefore, did not find it possible to recommend these proposals. The Committee decided that all such incomplete proposals should be returned to the respective State/UT Governments with the request to advise the concerned Organization to rectify these shortcomings and re-recommend for consideration of the Screening Committee in the future meeting.
7. Total 526 proposals for the year 2010-11 and 2011-12 received from the following State Governments were placed before the Committee for consideration. State wise number of proposals placed before the Committee and number of proposals recommended is as follows:
Sl. No.
Name of State/UT No. of proposals received.
No. of proposals recommended.
1 Andhra Pradesh 31 Nil 2 Assam 73 6 3 Bihar 6 Nil 4 Chhattisgarh 4 Nil 5 Delhi 2 Nil 6 Gujarat 26 Nil 7 Haryana 20 1 8 Himachal Pradesh 2 Nil 9 Jharkhand 4 Nil 10 Karnataka 60 1 11 Kerala 18 Nil 12 Maharashtra 65 (2011-12)
65(2010-11) 7 3
13 Meghalaya 1 Nil 14 Madhya Pradesh 22 Nil 15 Mizoram 3 Nil 16 Nagaland 4 1 17 Odisha 28 Nil 18 Puducherry 1 Nil 19 Rajasthan 61 Nil 20 Sikkim 1 Nil 21 Tamil Nadu 13 8 22 Tripura 6 Nil 23 West Bengal 10 1 Total: 526 28
8. State wise position of the new proposals placed before the Committee are given as under:
(i) Andhra Pradesh: All the 31 new proposals duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Govt. of Andhra Pradesh were placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing these proposals in detail, did not find any of the proposals suitable for recommendation. Details of each of the proposals along with the remarks of the Committee are at Annexure-I.
(ii) Assam: All the 73 new proposals duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Govt. of Assam were placed before the
Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing these proposals in detail, found only six proposals suitable for recommendation whose detail is given as under:
S. No.
Name of the Organization
Name of the project and location
1. Gram Vikas Pasrishad Mobile Medicare Unit, Nagaon.
2. Gram Vikas Pasrishad Mobile Medicare Unit, Morigaon.
3. South Borbond Gram Unnayan Samity
Mobile Medicare Unit, Hailakandi.
4. North East Rural Welfare Society
Old Age Home, Hailakandi.
5. North Hirapara Women &: Child Dev. Society
Multi Facility Care Centre for Older Widows, Darrang.
6. Dhula Reginal Physicalloy Hsandicapped Devt. Association
Multi Facility Care Centre for Older Widows, Darrang.
Details of each of the proposals along with the remarks of the Committee
is at Annexure-II.
(iii) Bihar: All the 6 new proposals duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Govt. of Bihar were placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing these proposals in detail, did not find any of the proposals suitable for recommendation. Details of each of the proposals along with the remarks of the Committee are at Annexure-III.
(iv) Chhattisgarh: All the 4 new proposals duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Govt. of Chhattisgarh were placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing these proposals in detail, did not find any of the proposals suitable for recommendation. Details of each of the proposals along with the remarks of the Committee are at Annexure-IV.
(v) Delhi: All the 2 new proposals duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Govt. of Delhi were placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing these proposals in detail, did not find any of the proposals suitable for recommendation. Details of each of the proposals along with the remarks of the Committee are at Annexure-V.
(vi) Gujarat: All the 26 new proposals duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Govt. of Gujarat were placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing these proposals in detail, did not find any of the proposals suitable for recommendation. Details of each of the proposals along with the remarks of the Committee are at Annexure-VI.
(vii) Haryana: All the 20 new proposals duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Govt. of Haryana were placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing these proposals in detail, found only one proposal suitable for recommendation whose details are given below:
S. No.
Name of the Organisation Name of Project and location.
1 Gram Swarajya Sansthan (Regd.),
Old Age Home at Vil. Gignau, Dist.Bhiwani
Details of each of the proposals along with the remarks of the Committee is
at Annexur-VII.
(viii) Himachal Pradesh: All the 2 new proposals duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Govt. of Himachal Pradesh were placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing these proposals in detail, did not find any of the proposals suitable for recommendation. Details of each of the proposals along with the remarks of the Committee are at Annexure-VIII.
(ix) Jharkhand: All the 4 new proposals duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Govt. of Jharkhand were placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing these proposals in detail, did not find any of the proposals suitable for recommendation. Details of each of the proposals along with the remarks of the Committee are at Annexure-IX.
(x) Karnataka: All the 60 new proposals duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Govt. of Karnataka were placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing these proposals in detail, found only one proposal suitable for recommendation details of which is given below:
S. No. Name of the Organisastion Name of the project and location
1 Vishwa Jyothi Vidya Samsthe Gazipura, Gulbarga.
Mobile Medicare Unit, Yadgiri
Details of each of the proposals along with the remarks of the Committee
are at Annexure-X.
(xi) Kerala: All the 18 new proposals duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Govt. of Kerala were placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing these proposals in detail, did not find any of the proposals suitable for recommendation.
Details of each of the proposals along with the remarks of the Committee are at Annexure-XI.
(xii) Maharashtra: All the 65 new proposals for 2010-11 which could not be considered in the last meeting of the Screening Committee held on 13-14 June 2011 and 65 new proposals for 2011-12 duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Govt. of Maharashtra were placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing these proposals in detail, found ten proposals suitable for recommendation details of which are given below:
S. No.
Name of the Organisation Name of Project and location.
1. Aai Deomogra Mahila Mandal, Tal. & Dist. Dhule (M.S.)
MFCC, Nandurbar
2. Jogai Mata Sanskrutik, Samajik Shaikshanik Mandal, Kapadane Tal. & Dhule.
Physiotherapy Clinict, Dist. Dhule
3. Uday Adiwasi Vikas Bahuuddeshiya Sanstha, Yavatmal Tq, Dist.Yavatmal (M.S.)
DCC, Dist.Wardha
4. Swami Vivekanand Gramin Dist.Latur (M.S.)
Old Age Home, Dist. Latur
5. Swapna Sakar Bahuuddeshiya Shikshan Sanstha, Tq.Ner Dist, Yavatmal (M.S.)
DCC, Dist. Yavatmal.(M.S.)
6. Swami Vivekanand Gramin Vikas Sanstha, Dist Latur
Old Age Home, Dist. Latur
7. Bhimlpen Aadiwasi Gramvikas Sanstha, Dist.Yavatmal (M.S.)
Multi Facility Centre, Dist.Wardha,
8. Maulana Mohanmmed All Johar Multipurpose Education & Soc. Chilkhali, Buldana
O ld Age Home, Buldana
9. Dongar Tukai Gram Vikas Pratishthan, Parbhani
Day Care Centre for persons with dementia, Beed
10. Rashtra Santa Tukodojisantha, Wanjari Ward, Gadchiroli, Yawatmal
Day Care Centre for persons with dementia, Gadchiroli
Details of each of the proposals along with the remarks of the Committee
are at Annexure-XII and XIII.
(xiii) Meghalaya: State level GIA Committee of Meghalaya had recommended only one proposal which was received through Government and was placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing the proposal in detail, did not find the proposal suitable for recommendation. Details of the proposal along with the remarks of the Committee are at Annexure-XIV.
(xiv) Madhya Pradesh: All the 22 new proposals duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Government of Madhya Pradesh were placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing these proposals in detail, did not find any of the proposals suitable for recommendation. Details of each of the proposals along with the remarks of the Committee are at Annexure-XV.
(xv) Mizoram: All the 3 new proposals duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Government of Mizoram were placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing these proposals in detail, did not find any of the proposals suitable for recommendation. Details of each of the proposals along with the remarks of the Committee are at Annexure-XVI.
(xvi) Nagaland: All the 4 new proposals duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Government of Nagaland were placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing these proposals in detail, found only one proposal suitable for recommendation, details of which are given below:
S. No.
Name of the Organisastion Name of the project and location
1. Haimrai society,Duiringreu Colony, Peren
Old Age Home, Meluri town, Distt. Phek
Details of each of the proposals along with the remarks of the Committee
are at Annexure-XVII.
(xvii) Odisha: All the 28 new proposals duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Government of Odisha were placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing these proposals in detail, did not find any of the proposals suitable for recommendation.
Details of each of the proposals along with the remarks of the Committee are at Annexure-XVIII.
(xviii) Puducherry: State level GIA Committee of Puducherry had recommended only one proposal which was through the State Government and was placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing the proposal in detail, did not find the proposal suitable for recommendation. Details of the proposal along with the remarks of the Committee is at Annexure-XIX.
(xix) Rajasthan: All the 61 new proposals duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Government of Rajasthan were placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing these proposals in detail, did not find any of the proposals suitable for recommendation. Details of each of the proposals along with the remarks of the Committee are at Annexure-XX.
(xx) Sikkim: State level GIA Committee of Sikkim had recommended only one proposal which was through the State Government and was placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing the proposal in detail, did not find the proposal suitable for recommendation. Details of the proposal along with the remarks of the Committee are at Annexure-XXI.
(xxi) Tamil Nadu: All the 13 new proposals duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Government of Tamil Nadu were placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing these proposals in detail, found eight proposals suitable for recommendation details of which are given below:
S. No Name of the Organisation. Name of Project and location.
1. Duraisamy Generous Social Education Association, Vivarayanallur, Kancheepuram.
Day Care Centre, Dist.Kancheepuram.
2. Gramiyam Sangh, Dist. Theni.
Day Care Centre, Dist.Theni
3. Sri Venkateswara Educatioonal Society, Kaduveli, Dist.Thanjavur.
Multi Facility Care Centre for older Widows, Dist.Thanjavur.
4. Selvi Trust, Dist. Sivagangai,
Multi Facility Care Centre for older Widows, Dist. Sivagangai.
5. Sri Ramakrishan Old Home, Dist. Thanjavur.
Old Age Home, Dist.Thanjavur.
6. Tamil Nadu Pengal Nala Sangam, Tiruchirapalli,
Old Age Home, Tiruchirapalli,
7. Centre for Rural Education and Economic Development (CREED) Chidambaram, Dist. Cuddalore.
Old Age Home, Dist.Cuddalore
8. Jayamatha Economical and Educational Trust, Trichy.
Old Age Home, Thuvakkudi & Post, Trichy
Details of each of the proposals along with the remarks of the Committee
are at Annexure-XXII.
(xxii) Tripura: All the 6 new proposals duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Government of Tripura were placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The Committee, on scrutinizing the proposal in detail, did not find any of the proposals suitable for recommendation. Details of the proposals along with the remarks of the Committee are at Annexure-XXIII.
(xxiii) West Bengal: All the 10 new proposals duly recommended by the State level GIA Committee and received through Government of West Bengal were placed before the Screening Committee for consideration. The
Committee, on scrutinizing these proposals in detail, found only one proposal suitable for recommendation details of which are given below:
S. No.
Name of the Organisation Name of the project
1 Calcutta Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology
Regional Resource and Training Centre, S.C. Banerjee Road, Kolkata
Details of each of the proposals along with the remarks of the Committee
are at Annexure-XXIV.
9. The recommendations of the Committee in para 8 above are subject to other conditions and completion of necessary formalities as per the norms/ guidelines of the Scheme.
(M. M. Sabharwal) (Fr. Joe Pereira) (T.V.A. Ram) Member Member Member
(T.R. Meena) Chairman
Annexure-I
Andhra Pradesh
S. No.
Name of the Organisation
Name of the project and location.
Remarks
1 ICC Social Service Association
Multi Facility Care Centre for Older Widows, Arundalpet, Guntur.
Audited Accounts do not show expenditure on running of Multi Facility Care Centre for Older Widows. Not recommended.
2 Rural Organisation for Social Activity (ROSA),
Physiotherapy Clinic for Older Persons, Palem Mandal, Guntur District,
Beneficiaries in the list of beneficiaries are found below the age of 60 years. Not recommended.
3 Rural Youth Development Organisation,
Old Age Home, Makavarapalem Mandal, Visakhapatnam.
(i) Incomplete Inspection Report. Name of the project is not mentioned in the Inspection Report. (ii) Rent agreement of the building in which the project is run has not been furnished. (iii) Aims and objective of the organisation in the MOA do not include welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
4 Loyola Organisation for Rural Development
Respite Care Homes and Continuous Care Homes for Older Persons, Kurnool.
(i) Aims and objectives of the organisation mentioned in the MOA do not include welfare activities for senior citizens, (ii) Audited Accounts do not show expenditure in Respite Care Centre for Older Persons. Not recommended.
5 Godavari Nilayam Social Service Organisation
Old Age Home, Polavaram, West Godavari District.
Audited Accounts do not show expenditure on running of old age home. Not recommended.
6 Sree Kasturibai Mahila Samajam
Old Age Home, Nidadavolu, West Godavari.
(i) Application Form submitted is photocopy and incomplete. (ii) Audited Accounts do not show expenditure on running of old age home. Not recommended.
7 Gandhiji Harijana Balaheena Varga Samkshema Mahila Mandali
Old Age Home, Gurajala Mandal, Guntur District.
(i) Application Form submitted is photocopy and incomplete. (ii) Audited Accounts do not show expenditure on running of old age home. Not recommended.
8 Rural Organisation for Sciety
Multi Facility Care Centre for Older Widows, Pittalavanipalem
Annual Reports for last two years has not been furnished with the proposal. Not recommended.
9 Swayameseva Association for Parents of Rural Children with Mentally Handicapped
Physiotherapy Clinic, Narsapur, Medak.
(i) Staff mentioned in the list of staff is not as per the Scheme. (ii) Audited Accounts do not show expenditure on running of Physiotherapy Clinic. Not recommended.
10 Tulasidhama Vrudda Ashram
Multi Facility Care Centre for Older Widows, Medakasira, Anantapur.
There is no mention about welfare activities for senior citizens by the organisation in the Annual Reports. Not recommended.
11 Integrated Rural Urban and Neutrino Developmnt Society
Multi Facility Care Centre for Older Widows, Kadiri Mandal, Anantapur.
(i) Application form is incomplete. (ii) Aims and objectives of the organisation do not include welfare activities for senior citizens in the MOA. (iii) Annual Reports do not show activity for senior citizens. Not recommended.
12 Sri Vasavi Educational Society
Old Age Home, Rangashaipet, Warangal
(i) Date of commencement of project has not been shown in Application Form. (ii) Aims and objectives of the organisation do not include welfare activities for senior citizens in the MOA. Not recommended.
13 Khasim & Khasim Educational Development Society
Old Age Home, Nandigama Mandal, Krishna District.
Registration Certificate has not been furnished with the proposal. Not recommended.
14 Soorthi Rural Development & Youth Welfare Organisation
Old Age Home, Eluru, West Godavari District.
Application form is not in the prescribed proforma. Not recommended.
15 Sri Issac Newton Health Education & Rural Technology Society
Old Age Home, Atmakur Mandal, Kurnool District.
No activity for senior citizens has been shown in the Annual Reports. Not recommended.
16 Bandari Sarojini Devei Memorial Foundation
Old Age Home, Ibrahimpatnam, RR District.
(i) Legible copy of the Registration Certificate has not been furnished. (ii) Annual Report is for one year only has been furnished. (iii) There is no mention about activities for senior citizens in the Annual Report for 2010-11. Not recommended.
17 Mary Matha Rural Development Society
Old Age Home, Tanguturu, Prakasham Distirct.
There is no mention about the activities for senior citizens in the Annual Report. Not recommended.
18 SEVA, Old Age Home, Tirupathi, Chittoor.
Annual Report is for one year only i.e. 2010-11 has been furnished. Not recommended.
19 Vasavi Educational Society
Multi Facility Care Centre for Older Widows, Kanigiri, Prakasham District.
The rent agreement needs to be checked. Not recommended.
20 Janga Society for Social Services
Old Age Home, Dachepalli, Guntur.
Date of commencement of the project is from 2011-12. Different areas of accommodation mentioned in the Inspection Report and application. Not recommended.
21 Sri Chaitanya Kalanjali Rural Development Organisation
Day Care Centre, Kothar Road, Chinnaganjam
Copies of Annual Report for last two years have not been furnished. Not recommended.
22 SC Women's Welfare Social Services Society
Old Age Home, Moosarmbagh, Hyderabad
Annual report for one year only i.e. 2010-11 has been furnished. Not recommended.
23 Adarna Mahila Mandali
Old Age Home, Vankuru, Krishna District,
Proposal submitted for 2011-12 whereas rent agreement is valid up to 31.3.2011. Not recommended.
24 Prajachaithanya Yuvajana Sangam
Old Age Home, Prakash Nagar, Yerramukkapalli, Kadappa
Audited Accounts do not show any expenditure on activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
25 Arun Mahila Mandali Old Age Home, Vijaywada
Very low expenditure on welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
26 Shanthi Mahila mandali
Old Age Home, Nalgonda
A copy of the Memorandum of Association has not been furnished with the proposal. Not recommended.
27 Mother Theressa Samksheema Seva Sangham
Old Age Home, Borravaripalem, Guntur
(i) Copies of the Annual Reports has not been furnished. (ii) Memorandum of Association is in Regional language. Not recommended.
28 Selagametti Charitable Trust
Old Age Home, Madhura Nagar, Visakhapatnam
Application form has not been signed by the authorised signatory. Not recommended.
29 SEVA, Sensitizing programmes for children in Schools and Colleges, Tirupati,
(i) The project is proposed to be undertaken after sanction. (ii) Beneficiaries found at the time of Inspection has not been shown in the Inspection Report. (iii) Audited Accounts do not show expenditure for carrying out of sensitization programme. Not recommended.
30 Kasturi Bai Mahila Mandali
Old Age Home, Warangal
Original Inspection Report and Application in the prescribed proforma have not been submitted. Not recommended.
31 Scheduled Tribe and Backward Classes Forming Society
Multifacility Care Centre of older Widowed Women
Name of the owner of the building and details of accommodation has not been indicated in the Inspection Report. Different amount of rent has been mentioned in the Inspection Report and Rent Agreement. Annual Reports do not mention about welfare activities for senior citizens. Aims and objectives of the organisation as mentioned in the Memorandum of Association do not include welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
Annexure-II ASSAM
S. No.
Name of the Organisastion
Name of the project and location
Remarks
1 Gram Vikas Pasrishad, Rangaloo, P.O. Jumaramur, Distt. Nagaon
Day Care Centre for Older Persons, Nagaon.
Annual report and accounts are available only for one year i.e. 2010-11. Not recommended.
2 Gram Vikas Pasrishad, Rangaloo, P.O. Jumaramur, Distt. Nagaon
Mobile Medicare Unit, Nagaon.
Recommended.
3 Women Welfare Society
Mobile Medicare Unit, Kamrup
Inspection Report is not in the prescribed format. No activity regarding welfare programmes for senior citizens mentioned in the Annual Reports. Not recommended.
4 Guwahati Youth Society (GYS)
Maintenance of Respite Care Homes and Continuous Care Homes for Older Persons, Kamrup.
Inspection Report is not in the prescribed format. As per the Annual Reports and Audited Accounts, the organization has not undertaken any specific activity for welfare of senior citizens. Not recommended.
5 Guwahati Youth Society (GYS)
Physiotherapy clinic, Kamrup.
Inspection Report is not in the prescribed format. Audited Accounts do not show expenditure on running and maintenance of Physiotherapy clinic. Not recommended.
6 De-Novo Women and Children Welfare Organisation
Multi Facility Care Centre for Older Widows, Nagaon.
All papers including Inspection Report and Application form etc are photocopy. Not recommended.
7 Roghurtook Club Old Age Home, Karimganj.
The Audited Accounts give consolidated expenditure for the programmmes of the organization. Not recommended.
8 Roghurtook Club Mobile Medicare Unit, Karimganj.
Number of beneficiaries present at the time of inspection has not been mentioned in the Inspection Report. The Audited Accounts statement reflects the consolidated statement of running MMU. Not recommended.
9 Women's Welfare Society
Multi Facility Care Centre for Older Widows, Kamrup.
As per the Audited Accounts, there is no expenditure in running of Multi Facility Care Centre for Older Widows. Not recommended.
10 Society for Dev. Of Day Care Centre There is no mention about the centre in the
North East for Older Persons, Kamrup.
Annual Reports and Audit accounts do not show expenditure in running of the DCC. Copy of the Memorandum of Association is not available with the proposal. Not recommended.
11 Society for Dev. Of North East
Maintenance of Respite Care Homes and Continuous Care Homes for Older Persons, Kamrup.
There is no mention about the centre in the Annual Reports and Audit accounts do not show expenditure in running of the DCC. Copy of the Memorandum of Association is not available with the proposal. Not recommended.
12 Shanti Akta society Physio-therapy clinic, Nagaon.
There is no mention about the centre in the Annual Reports and Audit accounts do not show expenditure in running of the DCC. Copy of the Memorandum of Association is not available with the proposal. Not recommended.
13 Best Friend Society Mobile Medicare Unit, Nagaon.
There are a number of discrepancies in the Inspection Report and regarding beneficiaries. As per the Inspection Report, no beneficiary was present at the time of inspection. Not recommended.
14 Gram Vikas Pasrishad,
Mobile Medicare Unit, Morigaon.
Recommended.
15 Global Health Immunisation & Jpopulation Control Organisation
Day Care Centre for Older Persons, Sonitpur.
Audited accounts and annual report available for one year only i.e. for 2010-11. Not recommended.
16 South Borbond Gram Unnayan Samity,
Mobile Medicare Unit, Hailakandi.
Recommended.
17 North East Rural Welfare Society
Old Age Home, Hailakandi.
Recommended.
18 Dr. AmbedkAnnual ReportMission
Mobile Medicare Unit, Kamrup.
Audited Accounts for last two years has not been furnished with the proposal. Annual report available for one year i.e. 2010-11 only. List of beneficiaries has not been furnished. Not recommended.
19 Ambikagiri Memorial Trust Society
Old Age Home, Guwahati.
(i) Inspection Report is not in the prescribed proforma. (ii) No activity on welfare of senior citizens has been mentioned in the Annual Reports and no expenditure welfare activity for senior citizens has been shown in Audited Accounts. (iii) Memorandum of Association has not been furnished.
Not recommended. 20 North Hirapara
Women &: Child Dev. Society
Multi Facility Care Centre for Older Widows, Darrang.
Recommended.
21 North Eastern Buddhist Cultural Association
Multi Facility Care Centre for Older Widows, Dibrugarh.
Documents have not been properly submitted. State Government has made recommendation for MFCC. Budget estimate and list of beneficiaries are Multi Service centre/Day Care Centre. Not recommended.
22 Ayur Herbal Natural Health Care Society
Mobile Medicare Unit, Dibrugarh.
List of beneficiaries and Annual Reports has not been submitted. Not recommended.
23 Prastuti Old Age Home, Dibrugarh.
No activity for senior citizens has been mentioned in the Annual Report and Audit accounts don not show. Not recommended.
24 North East Voluntary Association of Rural Dev. (NEVARD)
Respite Care Homes and Continuous Care Homes for Older Persons, Kamrup.
IR not signed..No activity in Annual Report/Audit accounts. Not recommended.
25 Bharasha Bridhabas Parichalana Samiti
Old Age Home, Kamrup.
RC expires in Jan.2012. No activity in accounts/Annual. Not recommended.
26 COSMOS Mission Sensitisation of students, Kamrup.
IR not enclosed. Annual report not available. No list of beneficiaries. Not recommended.
27 Dhula Reginal Physi8calloy Hsandicapped Desv. Asso.
Multi Facility Care Centre for Older Widows, Darrang.
Recommended.
28 Zila Bahumukhi Mahila Unnayan Samaj
Multi Facility Care Centre for Older Widows, Darrang.
As per Audited Accounts no expenditure incurred in running the centre/welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
29 National Dev. Foundation
Old Age Home, Dhubri.
Inspection Report is not available with the proposal. Not recommended.
30 Gram Vikas Kendra Multi Facility Care Centre for Older Widows, Lakhimpur.
Proposal submitted by the organization is for 2010-11 whereas recommendation of the State Government is for 2011-12. As per Annual Report, no activity on welfare of senior citizens has been undertaken. Not recommended.
31 KhorapathAnnual ReportSanmilita Yuvak Samaj
Mobile Medicare Unit, Lakhimpur.
Audited accounts gives consolidated expenditure on old age home and mobile medicare unit. Audited Accounts do not properly indicate expenditure incurred in running of old age home. Not recommended.
32 Khorapar Sanmilita Yuvak Samaj
Old Age Home, Lakhimpur.
33 KIRAN, NGO Day Care Centre for Older Persons, Lakhimpur.
(i) Validity of Registration certificate has been found expired. (ii) No activity on welfare of senior citizens mentioned in the Annual Reports. (iii) No expenditure on welfare activities of senior citizens shown in the Audited Accounts. Not recommended.
34 Bihuria Janaseva Unnayan Samity
MSC, Lakhimpur.
Audited Accounts and Annual Reports do not properly show expenditure in running of multi service centre and activities on welfare programmes for senior citizens. Not recommended.
35 Sorbadaya Udyog Old Age Home, Cacher.
(i) No activity on welfare programmes of senior citizens or running of old age home has been mentioned in the Annual Reports. (ii) Audited Accounts donot show expenditure in running of old age home. Not recommended.
36 North East Social Organisation(NESO)
Old Age Home, Morigaon.
(i) The organization is not running old age home. (ii) No detailed expenditure has been shown in the Audited Accounts on welfare programmes for senior citizens. Not recommended.
37 International Computers
Day Care Centre for Older Persons, Nagaon.
(i) Inspection Report is not in prescribed proforma. (ii) As per the Annual Reports and Audited Accounts, the organization is not carrying out any activity on senior citizens. Not recommended.
38 Jakhalabandha Satra Cultural Academy
Multi Facility Care Centre for Older Widows, Nagaon.
As per the Annual Reports and Audited Accounts, the organization is not carrying out any welfare activity on senior citizens. Not recommended.
39 Hatipara Udaia Samaj Kalyan Samity and Puthibharal,
Multi Facility Care Centre for Older Widows, Nagaon.
(i) As per the Annual Reports and Audited Accounts, the organization is not carrying out any activity on welfare of senior citizens. (ii) As per the list of beneficiaries age of beneficiaries are less than 60. Not recommended.
40 Institute of Management Resource Dev.
Day Care Centre for Older Persons,
There is no mention about running of day care centre and Audited accounts do not show expenditure on day care centre.
Nagaon. Not recommended. 41 NABA Astha Old Age Home,
Nagaon. There is no mention about running of day care centre Annual Reports and Audited accounts do not show expenditure on day care centre. Not recommended.
42 Socio Economic and Cultural Org.
Day Care Centre for Older Persons, Sonitpur.
There is no mention about running of day care centre Annual Reports and Audited accounts do not show expenditure on day care centre. Not recommended.
43 Rupjyoti Social Welfare Society
Old Age Home, Sonitpur.
There is no mention about running of old age home in the Annual Reports and Audited accounts do not show expenditure on old age home. Not recommended.
44 Central Tdinsukia NGO Front
Old Age Home, Tinsukhia.
Inspection Report is not in prescribed proforma. There is no mention about running of old age home and Audited accounts do not show expenditure on old age home. Not recommended.
45 Bharsha Old Age Home, Nagaon.
There is no mention about running of old age home in the Annual Reports and Audited accounts do not show expenditure on old age home. Not recommended.
46 Society of Total Social Esducation & Economical Dev. (Softseed)
Old Age Home, Sonitpur.
Audited Accounts and Annual Reports do not show specific activities undertaken for senior citizen. Not recommended.
47 Society of Total Social Esducation & Economical Dev. (Softseed)
Mobile Medicare Unit, Sonitpur.
Audited Accounts and Annual Reports do not show specific activities undertaken for senior citizen. Not recommended.
48 Kalyan Parishad Old Age Home, Sonitpur.
There are discrepancies in the information provided in the Inspection Report and Annual Report. Not recommended.
49 District Agriculture & Rural Dev. Association
Multi Facility Care Centre for Older Widows, Darrang.
Discrepancy in the information furnished in the Inspection Report. Not recommended.
50 Integrated Dev. Association
Old Age Home, Goalpara.
The proposal is for running of old age home on sanction of grant. Annual Reports do not show activities in running of old age home. Not recommended.
51 Sreemanta SankAnnual ReportMission
Day Care Centre for Older Persons, Nagaon.
There is no mention about running of day care centre and Audited accounts do not show expenditure on day care centre. Not recommended.
52 Sankar Madhab Krishti Bikas Kendra
Multi Facility Care Centre for Older Widows, Nagaon.
Aims and objectives of the organization as per the Memorandum of Association do not include welfare activities for senior citizens. As per the Inspection Report, the project has been recommended for 2012-13 and the project has been proposed to commence after receiving GIA. Not recommended.
53 Sadau Asom Gramya Puthibharal Santha
Day Care Centre for Older Persons, Nagaon.
Audited Account only for one year i.e. 2009-10 has been submitted. Audited Account does not show expenditure on running of the centre. Validity of Registration Certificate has been expired on 01/02/2011. Not recommended.
54 Gram Vikas Parishad Old Age Home, Nagaon.
Inadequate accommodateion. Not Recommended.
55 Adarsha Samaj Kalyan Samity
Multi Facility Care Centre for Older Widows, Nagaon.
Annual Reports do not mention about activities for senior citizens. Aims and objectives of the Memorandum of Association do not include welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
56 Dikrong Vally Environment & Rural Dev.
Multi Facility Care Centre for Older Widows, Lakhimpur.
Annual report for one year only i.e. 2010-11 has been submitted. Not recommended.
57 Rupahi Kohinoor Club
Multi Facility Care Centre for Older Widows, Golaghat.’
The project is proposed to be undertaken on release of grant. Not recommended.
58 Integrated Dev. Association
Day Care Centre for Older Persons, Sibsagar.
As per the Inspection Report, no beneficiaries were found present at the time of Inspection. Inspection Report has not been signed by the Inspecting Officer. Audited Accounts do not reflect expenditure on running the centre. Not recommended.
59 North Eastern Centre for Education
Multi Facility Care Centre for Older Widows, Chirang.
Inspection Report is not completely filled up. Inspecting Officer has not signed in Col 3 of the Inspection Report. Not recommended.
60 Spectrum Socio Educational Welfare Organisatin
Mobile Medicare Unit, Barpeta.
Inspecting Officer has not signed in Col 3 of the Inspection Report. Welfare activities for senior citizens is not include in the aims and objectives of the organization as per the Memorandum of Association. Audited accounts do not show expenditure on running of mobile medicare unit. There is no mention about the mobile medicare unit in the annual reports. Validity of Registration expired on
10/11/11. Not recommended.
61 Spectrum Socio Educational Welfare Organisatin
Old Age Home, Barpeta.
Inspecting Officer has not signed in Col 3 of the Inspection Report. Annual Reports do not mention about activities for senior citizens. Aims and objectives of the Memorandum of Association do not include welfare activities for senior citizens. Audited accounts do not show expenditure on running of old age home. There is no mention about the old age home in the annual reports. Registration certificate expired on 10/11/11. Not recommended.
62 Kahara Tarun Sangha Multi Facility Care Centre for Older Widows, Barpeta.
Inspecting Officer has not signed in Col 3 of the Inspection Report. Audited accounts do not show expenditure on running of mobile medicare unit. Not recommended.
63 Kahara Tarun Sangha Day Care Centre for Older Persons, Barpeta.
Inspecting Officer has not signed in Col 3 of the Inspection Report. Audited accounts do not show expenditure on running of day care centre. Not recommended.
64 Sunflower Multi Service Society(SMSS)
Day Care Centre for Older Persons, Barpeta.
Inspecting Officer has not signed in Col 3 of the Inspection Report. Audited accounts do not show expenditure on running of day care centre. Aims and objectives of the Memorandum of Association do not include welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
65 North East Council of Alternative Medicines(NECAM)
Old Age Home, Cacher.
Aims and objectives of the Memorandum of Association do not include welfare activities for senior citizens. Audited accounts do not show expenditure on running of old age home. Validity of Registration expired in July, 2011. Not recommended.
66 North East Voluntary Association of Rural Dev. (NEVARD)
Respite Care Homes and Continuous Care Homes for Older Persons, Cacher.
Aims and objectives of the Memorandum of Association do not include welfare activities for senior citizens. Audited accounts do not show expenditure on running of old age home. Not recommended.
67 Barak Valley Welfare Dev. Society
Multi Facility Care Centre for Older Widows, Cacher
Annual report for one year only i.e.2010-11 has been submitted. Not recommended.
68 Barak Valley Welfare Dev. Society
Old Age Home, Cacher
Aims and objectives of the Memorandum of Association do not include welfare activities
for senior citizens. Inspection report is not in prescribed proforma. Not recommended.
69 Jaluguti Agragami Mahila Samity
Multi Facility Care Centre for Older Widows, Morigaon.
Aims and objectives of the Memorandum of Association do not include welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
70 North Eastern Centre for Education
Respite Care Homes and Continuous Care Homes for Older Persons and Regional Resource and Training Centre, Kamrup.
Application for both the projects has been submitted in one application form. Not recommended.
71 North East Voluntary Association of Rural Dev. (NEVARD)
Respite Care Homes and Continuous Care Homes for Older Persons, Kamrup.
Aims and objectives of the Memorandum of Association do not include welfare activities for senior citizens. Audited accounts do not show expenditure on activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
72 North East Voluntary Association of Rural Dev. (NEVARD)
Respite Care Homes and Continuous Care Homes for Older Persons, Cacher.
A copy of the Inspection report has been submitted. Original Inspection Report has not been signed. Aims and objectives of the Memorandum of Association do not include welfare activities for senior citizens. Audited accounts do not show expenditure on activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
73 Gowahati Youth Society
Physiotherapy Clinic, Barpeta.
Aims and objectives of the Memorandum of Association do not include welfare activities for senior citizens. Audited accounts do not show expenditure on activities for senior citizens. Inspection Report has not been signed by the Inspecting Officer. Not recommended.
Annexure-III BIHAR
S. No. Name of the Organisastion
Name of the project and location
Remarks
1. Nabh Ankur, Muzzafarpur
Old Age Home, Mithanpura, Muzzafarpur
Accommodation is found to be inadequate for 50 beneficiaries. Not recommended.
2. Adarsh Sarvangin Mahila evam Bal vikas samiti, Belvamor, West Champaran
Old Age Home, Belvamor, West Champaran
Details of activities not mentioned in the Annual Reportsand Audited Accounts do not show details of expenditure. Not recommended.
3. Deeksha Bal Seva Sansthan, Hajipur, Vaishali
Day Care Centre, Hajipur,
Aims and objectives in the Memorandum of Association do not include welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
4. Vishwabandhu, Ileempur, Sitamarhi
Old Age Home, Chandiha, Sheohar
List of beneficiaries is not in prescribed proforma and rent agreement has not been submitted. Not recommended.
5. Dalit Mahila Jan Kalyan Sansthan, East Champaran
Old Age Home, Maoje Maisthan Raxaul, East Champaran
Aims and objectives in the Memorandum of Association do not include welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
6 Sister Nivedita Memorial Trust, New Jakkanpur, Patna
Helpline & Counseling centre, Indira lane, New Jakkanpur, Patna
The organization does not have experience in the field. Helpline number has not been provided. Not recommended.
Annexure-IV Chhattisgarh
S. No.
Name of Organisation
Name of Project and project
location.
Remarks
1. Samta Manch Vridhaashram
Home for Old Ages, G.E. Road Parrinala, Rajnandgaon
Copy of Memorandum of Association is not legible. Audited Accounts do not reflect expenditure on activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
2. Janparisad Bilaspur Vridh Ashram
Old Age Home, Aprajita Bhawan Azadnagar Near Police Line Bilaspur
Audited Accounts do not reflect expenditure on activities for senior citizens. Copies of Annual Reports has not been submitted. Not recommended.
3. Suraj Vikas Sansthan Vridh Ashra Kondagaon, Bastar,
Old Age Home, Kondagaon, Bastar,CG
Aims and objectives of the organization do not include welfare activities for senior citizens in the Memorandum of Associations. Copies of Annual Reports and list of beneficiaries have not been submitted. Not recommended.
4. Nav Abhilasha Shikshan Sansthan Dongargarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon
Multi Service Centre, Dongargarh, Distt. Rajnandgaon
Complete list of beneficiaries has not been submitted. Not recommended.
Annexure-V Delhi
S. No.
Name of the Organisation
Name of the project
Remarks
1 ARDSI Delhi Chapter.
Day Care Centres for Care of Old persons with Dementia
Inspecting Officer has not recommended the proposal in the Inspection Report. Not recommended.
2 Kriti Foundation Day Care Centre Incomplete Inspection Report. Inspection Report has not been signed by the Inspecting Team. Not recommended.
Anexure-VI Gujarat
S. No.
Name of the Organisation
Name of the project and location.
Remarks
1 Jeevan Jyot Charitable Trust
Mobile Medicare Unit, Patan
Inspection Report is not in the prescribed proforma and has not been signed by Inspecting Team (not mentioned of Designation of Inspecting Team). Copies of Annual Reports and Memorandum of Association have not been submitted. Not recommended.
2 Muni Seva Ashram Old Age Home, Vadodra
No welfare activities of senior citizens mentioned in the Annual Reports. Not recommended.
3 Jeevandeep Health Education and Charitable Trust
Physiotherapy, Gujarat
Inspection Report is not complete in all respect. Not recommended.
4 Jivan Jyot Charitable Trust
Physiotherapy, Patan
Inspection Report is not complete in all respect. Not recommended.
5 Dr.Ambedkar Education Trust
Day Care Centre, Bhavnagar
Aims and objectives of the organisation do not include welfare activities for senior citizens in the Memorandum of Association. Not recommended.
6 Shree Kawant Taluka Adivasi Vikas mandal
Old Age Home, Kawant
Documents submitted are in regional language. Not recommended.
7 Shree Nityanand Swamy Education Trust
Old Age Home, Nar
Inspection Report is not in the prescribed proforma. Not recommended.
8 Jeevan Jyot Charitable Trust
Disability and Hearing Aid for Eleder, Patan
Inspection Report is not in the prescribed proforma and has not signed by Inspecting Team. Copies of the Annual Reports have not submitted. Not recommended.
9 Akhil Gujarat Rohidas Vanshi Seva Sangh
Old Age Home, Vadodra
Inadequate documentation and documents submitted are in regional language. Not recommended.
10 Shree Swami Vivekananda Yuvak Mandal
Mobile Health Care Centre for the Old Age, Bhuj
Inspection Report is not in the prescribed proforma and not complete in all respect. Beneficiaries mentioned in the list of beneficiaries are under the age of sixty years. Not recommended.
11 Asil Navsarjan Rural Development Foundation
Old Age Home, Ahmedabad
Aims and objectives of the organisation do not include welfare activities for senior citizens in the Memorandum of
Association. Documents submitted are in regional language. Not recommended.
12 Manav Seva Trust Physiotherapy Clinic, Valsad.
Copies of Annual Reports have not been submitted. Not recommended.
13 Pressmen's Multipurpose Development Organisation
Older Widow and Distress Women's, Dahod
Rent agreement has not been submitted with the proposal. Annual Reports do not reflect activities on welfare of senior citizens. Not recommended.
14 Lokseva Sarvjanik Trust
Old Age Home, Kachchh
Inspection Report not signed by the Inspecting team/ Recommending Officer and most of the paper submitted is in Regional Language. Not recommended.
15 Shree Kulu Mahila and Val Kalyan Trust
Old Age Home, Bunuskanthu
Documents submitted are in regional language. Copies of Annual Reports have not been submitted. Not recommended.
16 Shree Gram Nirman Trust
Helpline and Counceling Centre, Bhavnagar
Aims and objectives of the organisation do not include welfare activities for senior citizens in the Memorandum of Association. Audited Accounts do not reflect expenditure on welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
17 Jay Bharati Foundation
Old Age Home, Ahmedabad
Documents submitted are in regional language. Not recommended.
18 National Association for the Blind
Old Age Home, junagadh
Original Inspection Report has not been submitted. Copy of Memorandum of Association has not been submitted. Not recommended.
19 Vikas Trust Old Age Home, Varoda
Original Inspection Report has not been submitted. Inspection report and Application has not been signed. Not recommended.
20 Jivan Sandhya Trust Old Age Home, Patan
Original Inspection Report has not been submitted. Inspection report and Application has not been signed. Not recommended.
21 Kutch vikas trust Old Age Home, Kachchh
Original Inspection Report has not been submitted. Inspection report and Application has not been signed. Not recommended.
22 seva ashram charitable trust
Old Age Home, porbander
Original Inspection Report has not been submitted. Inspection report and Application has not been signed. Not recommended.
23 Shri Hari Public charitable trust
Old Age Home, virmgan
Original Inspection Report has not been submitted. Inadequate documentation. Not recommended.
24 Muni Seva Ashram Old Age Home, Vadodra
Date of commencement of project has not been mentioned. Not recommended.
25 Sarvoday Seva Trust Physiotherapy Clinic, Ahmedabad
Inspection report has not been signed by the Inspecting officers. Copies of Annual Reports have not been signed. Not recommended.
26 Shree Navchetan Andhjan Mandal, Madhapar, Dist. Kachchh (Guj.)
Physiotherapy Clinic, Bhuj
Inspection Report and Application Form is not in prescribed proforma. Not recommended.
Annexure-VII
Haryana S. No.
Name of the Organisation Name of Project and location.
Remarks
1 Adarsh Saraswati Shiksha Samiti Dist. Sonepat, Haryana.
Old Age Home, Dist. Sonepat, Haryana.
Discrepancy found in the area of accommodation mentioned in the rent agreement and application form. No details regarding old age home has been mentioned in Annual Reports. Not recommended.
2 Jan Sewa Samiti, Bhiwani Road,Dist. Rohtak, Haryana.
Old Age Home, Dist. Rohtak, Haryana.
Details of activities relating to the old age home has not been mentioned in the Annual Reports. Discrepancies found regarding expenditure on welfare activities for senior citizens in the Audited Accounts. Not recommended.
3 Universal Social Health Association (USHA) Dist. Karnal,Haryana
Old Age Home, Dist. Karnal, Haryana
Aims and objectives of the organisation do not include welfare activities for senior citizens in the Memorandum of Association. Not recommended.
4 Nav Jan Morch Samiti,Dist. Faridabad, Haryana.
Old Age Home, Dist. Faridabad, Haryana.
As per the Annual Reports, no welfare activities for senior citizens has been under taken. Not recommended.
5 Mahila Chetna Samiti, Dist. Mahendergarh, Haryana.
Old Age Home, Dist. Mahendergarh, Haryana.
No date of inspection has been mentioned in the Inspection Report. Not recommended.
6 Unique Welfare Socicty.Dist. Hisar, Haryana.
Old Age Home, Dist. Hisar, Haryana.
Aims and objectives of the organisation do not include welfare activities for senior citizens in the
Memorandum of Association. Not recommended.
7 Gram Swarajya Sansthan (Regd.),vill-Giganu, Loharu Disti. Bhivani
Old Age Home, Vil. Gignau, Tel. Loharu Dist.Bhiwani
Recommended.
8 Bharat Vikas Sangh (Regd.),Dist. Rohtak, Haryana
Old Age Home, Dist. Rohtak, Haryana
Activities on older persons is not reflected in the Audited Accounts and Annual Reports. Not recommended.
9 Nationa Organization of India(Go To Village),Dist. Hisar, Haryana.
Old Age Home, Dist. Hisar, Haryana.
There is no mention about old age home in the Annual Reports. Not recommended.
10 Gram Swarajya Sansthan (Regd.), Dist. Hisar, Haryana.
Old Age Home, Dist. Hisar, Haryana.
Date of commencement of the project and number of beneficiaries found present at the time of Inspection has not mentioned in the Inspection Report. Not recommended.
11 Dist Red Cross Society, Dist. Branch , Punchkula, Haryana.
Maintenance Frunnig of OLD, Dist. Branch , Punchkula, Haryana.
Inspection report is not complete in all respect. Not recommended.
12 Gram Swarajya Sansthan(Regd.), 196, Prem Nagar, Dist. Hisar. Haryana
Old Age Home, Dist. Hisar. Haryana
There is no mention about old age home in the Annual Reports. Not recommended.
13 Yuva Krant Mission, H.No. 370, Sector-13, Dist. Hisar Haryana.
Physitherapy Clinics, Dist. Hisar. Haryana
Papers are incomplete. Not recommended.
14 Guru Ram Dass Education & Welfare Society, Gopal Mochan, Dist. Yamuna Nagar, Haryana.
Mobile Medicare Unit, Dist. Yamuna Nagar, Haryana.
Inspection report is not complete. Not recommended.
15 Women Welfare Association (Regd.) Dist. Rohtak, Haryana.
Mobile Medicare Unit, Dist. Rohtak, Haryana.
Discrepancies found in the Inspection Report. Not recommended.
16 Bharat Vikas Samghj (Regd.) Dist. Rohtak, Haryana.
Physitherapy Clinic, Dist. Rohtak, Haryana.
Discrepancies found in the Inspection Report. Not recommended.
17 Radha- Krishan- Education Society H.S.R. Dist.Hisar, Haryana.
Physitherapy Clinic, Dist.Hisar, Haryana.
Original inspection report has not been submitted. Discrepancies found in the Inspection Report. Not recommended.
18 Haryana Nav Yuvak Kala Sangam, Dist. Rohtak, Haryana.
Mobile Medicare Unit, Dist. Rohtak, Haryana.
Copies of Annual Reports for last twe years has not been submitted. Not recommended.
19 Amar Jyoti Foundation, Dist. Jind, Haryana.
Physitherapy Clinic, Dist. Jind, Haryana.
Inspection Report has not been signed by the Inspecting Team. Not recommended.
20 Adarsh Saraswati Shiksha Samiti, Kakroi Road, Sonepat
Physitherapy Clinic, Sonepat
Rent agreement and list of beneficiaries has not been submitted with the proposal. Not recommended.
Annexure-VIII
Himachal Pradesh S. No.
Name of the Organisation
Name of the project and location.
Remarks
1 Old age Helpline Society Day Care Centre, Solan
Inspection Report found to be not complete/not in the prescribed proforma. Application has not been signed by the authorised signatory of the organisation. Annual Reports do not reflect activity on senior citizens. Not recommended.
2 Himachal Pradesh Senior Citizens Forum
Volunteers Bureaus for older persons, Shimla
Original Inspection Report has not been furnished. Copy of the Memorandum of Association has not been certified by the Org. Not recommended.
Annexure-IX JHARKHAND
S. No. Name of
Organisation Name of Project Remarks
1. Sahayogi Mahila Bagraisai
Old Age Home, Seraikella Kharswan, Jharkhand
Inspection Report is not in prescribed proforma. Aims and objectives of the organisation mentioned in Memorandum of Association do not include welfare activities for senior citizens. No activity for senior citizens mentioned in the Annual Reports. Audited Accounts do not reflect expenditure on welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
2. Bharat Sevashram Sangha
Old Age Home, P.O&Distt Pakur Jharkhand
Inspection Report is not in prescribed proforma. Aims and objectives of the organisation mentioned in Memorandum of Association do not include welfare activities for senior citizens. No activity for senior citizens mentioned in the Annual Reports. Audited Accounts do not reflect expenditure on welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
3. Maa Durga Vikash Samitee
Old Age Home, Distt Palamau Jharkhand
Inspection Report is not in prescribed proforma. Aims and objectives of the organisation mentioned in Memorandum of Association do not include welfare activities for senior citizens. No activity for senior citizens mentioned in the Annual Reports. Audited Accounts do not reflect expenditure on welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
4. Naree Kalyan Kendra, Chaibasa
Old Age Home, West Singbhum Jharkhand
Inspection Report is not in prescribed proforma. Aims and objectives of the organisation mentioned in Memorandum of Association do not include welfare activities for senior citizens. No activity for senior citizens mentioned in the Annual Reports. Audited Accounts do not reflect expenditure on welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
Annexure-X KARNATAKA
S. No.
Name of the Organisation
Name of Project. Remarks.
1. Kurds (Kalpavruksha Urban and Rural Development society), Tumkur, Karnataka.
Day Care Centre, Tumkur Karnataka
Registration Certificate in regional language. As per the Audited Accounts, no expenditure has been incurred in running the Centre. Not recommended.
2. Gandiji Grameen Aabhivrudhi and Rehabilitaation Organisation , Sri Annapoorneshwari Vrudhashrama. Kuvempu Nagar, Kunigal Karnataka.
Old Age Home, Dist. Tumkur Karnataka
Memorandum of Association and Registration Certificate are in regional language. Not recommended.
3 De-addiction Treatment & Education (DATE) Chartable Society ®, Chitradurga, Karntaka
Day Care Centre for persons with Dementia, Dist.Chitradurga, Karnataka
Audited Accounts and Annual Reports do not reflect working experience for the welfare of senior citizens. Not recommended.
4. Date Chartable Society (R) No.279, 4th Cross, J.C.R. Extn. Chitrdurga. Karnataka.
Sensitizing programmes for children in Schools and Colleges, Dist. Chitradurga Karanataka
Audited Accounts and Annual Reports do not reflect working experience for the welfare of senior citizens. Not recommended.
5. Marteen Education Socuety, Yadgiri Multi Facility Care Centre for Older widow women Dist. Yadgiri Karnataka
Multi facility Care Centres for destitute older widow women, Dist. Yadgiri Karnataka
The report mentions 75 beneficiaries but the Audited Statement of Accounts does not reflect commensurate expenditure for the entire duration. Not recommended.
6. Lalitha Academy Dist Shimoga. Karnataka
Day Care Centre for persons with Dementia, Dist Shimoga. Karnataka
No proper staff has been appointed. Date of commencement of the project is with effect from April 2011. Not recommended.
7. Shanthala Sangeetha and Nruthyalaya Charitable Trust Dist. Ramanagar. Karnataka
Old Age Home, Dist. Ramanagar. Karnataka
Aims and objectives do not include welfare activities for senior citizens in the Memorandum of Association. Not recommended.
8. Navjeevan Education Society Raichur. Karnataka
Multi Service Centre (DCC), Raichur,
Expenditure on old age home mentioned in the Annual report not reflected in the audited
Karnataka statement of accounts. Not recommended.
9. Sri Mathurshree Education Society.(R) Dist. Mandya Karnataka.
Old Age Home, Dist. Mandya Karnataka
Inadequate experience of running programmes for older persons. Mismatch in Annual report and Audited Statement of Accounts. Not recommended.
10 Shri Hanuman Seva Samiti, K.H.B.Colony, Solapur Road, Bijapur, Karnataka
Day Care Centre for persons with Dementia, Mysore
Annual Reports do not reflect activities on welfare of senior citizens. Not recommended.
11. Btvps-Kayak Vikas Vedike Yarandgi Humnabad Dist. Bidar, Karnataka.
Multi facility Care Centres for destitute older widow women, Dist. Bidar, Karnataka
Aims and objectives do not include welfare activities for senior citizens in the Memorandum of Association. Not recommended.
12. Navjeevan Education Society, Bidar, Karnataka.
Multi facility Care Centres for destitute older widow women, Bidar, Karnataka
Registration Certificate is in regional language. Not recommended.
13. Swadesi Mahila Mandali, Dist Chitradurga. Karnataka.
Day Care Centre, Dist Chitradurga. Karnataka
Aims and objectives do not include welfare activities for senior citizens in the Memorandum of Association. Annual Reports do not reflect activities on welfare of senior citizens. Not recommended.
14. Navjeevan Education Society, Yadgiri, Bidar, Karnataka.
Day Care Centre, Yadgiri, Bidar . Karnataka
Inspection Report is incomplete and not in prescribed proforma. Not recommended.
15. Sri Shakthi Association ® Guttur Colony Harihar, Dist Davanagere Karnataka.
Day Care Centre for persons with Dementia, Chikkamangulr
The project is proposed to be started on receipt of grant. Not recommended.
16. Sanjeevini Education Society, Chowdeshwar Colony, Brahmapur, Gulbarga Karnataka
Old Age Home, Brahmapur, Gulbarga Karnataka
Annual report details do not match with Audited Statement of Accounts. Audited statement of accounts only gives consolidated expenditure on old age home. Not recommended.
17. Sri Kalikamba Association, Siddaramappa Badavaane, 9th Cross, Holalkere, Dist. Chitradurga Karnataka.
Multi facility Care Centres for destitute older widow women, Haveri
Date of commencement of the project is April 2011. Not recommended.
18. Annapurna Assocation ® Chintamani Nagar, Harihar, Dist. Davaanagere, Karnataka
Day Care Centre for persons with Dementia, Kodagu
Registration Certificate is in regional language, Aims and objectives do not include welfare activities for senior citizens in the Memorandum of Association. Not recommended.
19 Sri Ramana Maharshi Trust for Disabled Persons ® Dist Kolar, Karnataka.
Day Care Centre for persons with Dementia, Dist Kolar, Karnataka
No mention about activities for the welfare of senior citizens in the Annual Reports. Audited Accounts do not reflect expenditure on running of the centre. Not recommended.
20. Date Chartable Society (R) No.279, 4th Cross, J.C.R. Extn. Chitrdurga. Karnataka.
Training of Caregivers to the older persons, Dist. Chitradurga Karanataka
The project is proposed to be started. The organization does not have experience in imparting training. Not recommended.
21. Akilkarnataka Veershaiva Mahasabha “Kalakiran”, Burajahatti Road, Chitradurga, Karnataka
Day Care Centre for persons with Dementia, Chitradurga, Karnataka
Inspection Report is incomplete and not in the prescribed proforma. Registration Certificate is in regional language. Audited Accounts do not reflect expenditure in running the Centre. Not recommended.
22. Samaj Seva Samiti ® Hanumanthya Mnagar, Banglore, Karnataka.OAH
Multi facility Care Centres for destitute older widow women, Bangalore
No mention about activities for the welfare of senior citizens in the Annual Reports. Audited Accounts do not reflect expenditure on running of the centre. Not recommended.
23. Sumanahalli Society, Banglore, Karnataka.
Mobile Medicare Unit, Banglore. Karnataka
Aims and objectives do not include welfare activities for senior citizens in the Memorandum of Association. Audited Accounts do not reflect expenditure on running of the centre. Not recommended.
24. Sumanahalli Society, Banglore, Karnataka.
Old Age Home, Banglore. Karnataka
Aims and objectives do not include welfare activities for senior citizens in the Memorandum of Association. Audited Accounts do not reflect expenditure on running of the centre. Not recommended.
25. Vishwa Bharathi Kalanikethan& Education Society, Bellary, Karnataka
Old Age Home, Bellary. Karnataka
Inspection Report is not available with the proposal. Not recommended.
26. Sri Siddeshwara Vidya Peet, Ananthpur Peth, Talikoti, Dist. Bijapur, Karnataka.
Old Age Home, Dist. Bijapur. Karnataka
Registration Certificate is in regional language. Not recommended.
27. Sri Siddeshwara Vidya Peeta ® Ananthpur Peth Talikoti Dist. Bijapur, Karnataka.
Multi facility Care Centres for destitute older widow women, Dist. Bijapur. Karnataka.
Annual Reports do not reflect activities undertaken for the welfare of senior citizens. Not recommended.
28. Indian Red Cross Society, Davangere, Dist. Davanagere, Karnataka.
Physiotherapy Clinic, Dist. Davanagere, Karnataka.
Copies of Annual Reports and list of beneficiaries have not been furnished with the proposal. Audited Accounts do not show expenditure in running the clinic. Not recommended.
29. Indian Red Cross Society,Dist. Branch , Mysore, Karnataka
Old Age Home, Dist. Branch, Mysore, Karnat
Copies of Annual Reports and list of beneficiaries have not been furnished with the proposal. Audited Accounts do not show expenditure in running the clinic. Not recommended.
30. Indian Red Cross Society, Dist. Branch, Mysore, Karnataka
Old Age Home, Dist. Branch, Mysore, Karnat
Copies of Annual Reports and list of beneficiaries have not been furnished with the proposal. Audited Accounts do not show expenditure in running the clinic. Not recommended.
31. Emmanuel Orphanage and Childcare Centre, Banglore, Karnataka
IPOP, Dist. Banglore. Karnataka
Date of commencement of the project is from April 2011. No trained counselor mentioned in the staff list. Discrepancy in the Rent agreement.
Not recommended. 32. Karunya Makkala Seva
Samasthe. Day Care Centre, Dist. Banglore. Karnataka
Copies of Annual Reports have not been furnished with the proposal. Not recommended.
33. Karunalaya Makkala Seva Samastjhe.
Volunteers Bureau for older persons, Dist. Banglore. Karnataka
Inspection Report is not complete in all respect. Copies of Annual Reports have not been furnished with the proposal. Not recommended.
34. Limra Education & Welfare Trust ® Dist. Banglore, Karnataka
Day Care Centre, Dist. Banglore. Karnataka
Inspection Report is not complete in all respect. Registration Certificate is in regional language. Audited Accounts do not reflect expenditure incurred in running the Centre. As per the Annual Reports, no welfare activities for senior citizens has been undertaken. Not recommended.
35. Limra Education & Welfare Trust ®, Dist. Banglore, Karnataka
Old Age Home, Dist. Banglore. Karnataka
Inspection Report is incomplete. Registration Certificate is in regional language. As per the Annual Reports, no welfare activities for senior citizens have been undertaken. Not recommended.
36. Sumanahlli Society, Viswaneedam Post, Magadi Road, Dist. Banglore.Karnataka.
Sensitizing programmes for children in Schools and Colleges, Dist. Banglore, Karnataka
Aims and objectives of the organization mentioned in the Memorandum of Association do not include welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
37 Akkamahadevi Mahila Kalyan Samsthe –Siddeahwar Kripa, Plot No. 12, M.M.Extension, Mahantesg Nagar, Belagum- Karnataka.
Multi facility Care Centres for destitute older widow women, Dist. Belagum- Karnataka
As per the Annual Reports, no welfare activities for senior citizens has been undertaken by the organisation. Not recommended.
38. Akkamahadevi Mahila Kalyan Samsthe –Siddeahwar Kripa, Plot No. 12, M.M.Extension, Mahantesg Nagar, Belagum- Karnataka.
Regional Resource and Training Centre (RRTC), Dist. Belagum- Karnataka
Inspection Report is incomplete. Registered copy of the Memorandum of Association has not been submitted. Not recommended.
39. Akkamahadevi Mahila Kalyan Samsthe –Siddeahwar Kripa, Plot No. 12, M.M.Extension, Mahantesg Nagar, Belagum- Karnataka.
Day Care Centre, Dist.Belagum- Karnataka
As per the Annual Reports, no mention about running of the centre. List of beneficiaries has not been furnished. Not recommended.
40. Kid’s, Bailhongal (Karnataka Integrated Development Society, A/P: Bailhongal, Dist. Belgaum, Karnataka.
Sensitizing programmes for children in Schools and Colleges, Dist.Belagum- Karnataka.
Inspection Report is not complete. Registration Certificate is in regional language. Audited Accounts do not reflect expenditure on welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
41. Karnataka Integrated Development Society, Bailhongal, Karnataka.
Day Care Centre for persons with Dementia, Dist.Belagum- Karnataka
Inspection Report is not complete. Registration Certificate is in regional language. Audited Accounts do not reflect expenditure on welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
42. Vidhya Chetan Rural Develoment Society, Post :Kerur, Tal: Chikodi, Dist. Belgaum. Krnataka.
Helpline and Counseling Centre, Dist.Belagum- Karnataka
Application has not been signed by the authorized signatory of the organization. List of beneficiaries has not been furnished. Annual Reports do not mention about welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
43. Mudhol Shri Shivayogi Shivlingeshwar Shakshan Samsthe, SCHL S.P. Office, Solapur Road, Bijapur.Karnataka
Helpline and Counseling Centre, Bijapur, Karnataka.
Annual Reports do not mention about welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
44 Shree Poornananda Swamiji Memorial Education society, V & Tq Badami, Bagalkot District, Karnataka State
Old Age Home, Distict Bagalkot
Inspection Report is not complete. Aims and objectives of the organization mentioned in the Memorandum of Association do not include welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
45 Sri Prabhudeva Vidhya Samsthe, Koratikere Kanguvalli Chitadurga Sistrict District
Old Age Home, Chitadurga Sistrict District Karnataka
Inadequate experience of running facilities for older persons. Annual report does not mention details of activities on
Karnataka old age home. Not recommended.
46 A.Ababil, Welfare Trust, Layout, Bangalore. Karnataka.
Old Age Home, Layout, Karnataka
Aims and objectives of the organization mentioned in the Memorandum of Association do not include welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
47 Date Chartable Society (R) Koppal Branch, B.T. Patil Nagara,, Gangava Dist. Koppal.
Old Age Home, Koppal
The project is proposed to be undertaken on receipt of grant. Dimensions of the building and map are not enclosed. Annual Report only mentions awareness generation programmes not any service delivery programmes. Not recommended.
48 Sree Siddaganga educatioon Spcoety ® Sree Siddaganga Mata, Tumkur Taluk & Dkstrict.
Old Age Home, Dist Tumkur Taluk Karnataka.
Aims and objectives of the organization mentioned in the Memorandum of Association do not include welfare activities for senior citizens. Audited Accounts do not reflect expenditure on welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
49 Sri Siddaganga Mutt, Tumkur Karnataka
Mobile Medicare Unit, Dist Tumkur Taluk Karnataka.
List of beneficiaries and copies of Annual Reports have not been provided with the proposal. Not recommended.
50 M.G.Education Society, 10th Cross, Mahalakshmi Nagara, Batawadi Tumkur, Karnataka.
Day Care Centre, Batawadi Tumkur. Karnataka
Annual Reports do not mention about the Day Care Centre. Not recommended.
51 Vishwa Jyothi Vidya Samsthe Gazipura, Gulbarga. Karnataka
Mobile Medicare Unit, Yadgiri
All papers are complete. Recommended.
52 Vishwa Jyothi Vidya Samsthe Gazipura Gulbarga. Karnataka
Day Care Centre for persons with Dementia, Yadigiri
Annual Reports do not mention about the Day Care Centre. Not recommended.
53 Dr. Sushil Health Care & Education Society, M.B.Nagar, Gulbarga, Karnataka
Mobile Medicare Unit, Gulbarga
Registration Certificate and Memorandum of Association are in regional language. Not recommended.
54 Sanjeevini Edusation Socoety’s Sri Mata Mamolesjwaro, Jewargo Road,
Old Age Home, Jewargo Road, Gulbrga Karnataka
Annual Reports and Audited Accounts do not reflect details of activities undertaken in running the old age
Gulbrga Karnataka. home/welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
55 Dr. Sushil Health Care & Education Society, M.B. Nfagar, Gulbarga. Karnataka.
Day Care Centre, Gulbarga
Date of commencement of the project has not been mentioned in the Inspection Report. Application form is not in prescribed proforma. Not recommended.
56 Seon Ashram Trust ® Gandibagilu Post. Belthangady Taluka, Karnataka
Old Age Home, Dakshin Kannada
Original copy of the Inspection Report has not been furnished. Audited Accounts do not reflect expenditure on old age home. Not recommended.
57 Chikmagalur Rotary Inner Wheel Trust® “Jeevan Sandhya” Unit-2 Kadrimidri, Mugthihalli Post, Chikmagalur, Karnataka.
Old Age Home, Chikmagalur. Karnataka.
Audited Accounts do not reflect expenditure on old age home. Not recommended.
58 De-additioooon Treatment and/Education (DATE) Chirtiable Society ®, Chitradurga, Karnataka
Old Age Home, Dist. Chitradurga. Karnataka
Copies of Annual Reports have not been furnished with the proposal. Not recommended.
59 Adityananadaural and Human Resourcr Development Society, No. 210, 4th Main 2nd Cross, Sampige Layout, Banglore, Karnataka.
Old Age Home, No. 210, 4th Main 2nd Cross, Sampige Layout, Banglore ,Karnataka.
Inspection Report is not complete in all respect. Registration Certificate is in regional language, Not recommended.
60 Indian Red Cross Society, Koppal
Physiotherapy Clinic, Koppal
Proposal is not complete in all respect. Not recommended.
Annexure-XI Kerala
S. No.
Name of the Organisation
Name of the project and location.
Remarks
1 Sri Mohan Shastipoorthi Smaraka Hindu Mahinlmandiram
Construction of building for aged, Poojappura
Not considered as there is no Scheme for providing financial assistance for construction of old age home. Not recommended.
2 Ozanam bhawan Construction of building for aged, Nadawayal
Not considered as there is no Scheme for providing financial assistance for construction of old age home. Not recommended.
3 Sancta Maria Convent Muthunayagam Home for the Aged
Construction of building for aged, Plamoodu
Not considered as there is no Scheme for providing financial assistance for construction of old age home. Not recommended.
4 Paalana Institute of Medical Sciences
Training of Caregivers to the older persons, Palakad
Beneficiaries are average od 17 -18 years old. Not recommended.
5 Paalana Institute of Medical Sciences
Sensitization programme for school and college students, Palakad
Overwriting in Inspection Report, Application Form is not in Prescribed Proforma. Not recommended.
6 Paalana Institute of Medical Sciences
Physiotherapy clinic, Palakad
Rent Agreement has not been furnished. Application Form is not the prescribed proforma. The organisation has no working experience in the field of aged. Not recommended.
7 Paalana Institute of Medical Sciences
Mobile Medicare Unit, Palakad
Application Form is not in the prescribed proforma. Not recommended.
8 Vengara Area Senior Citizens Organisations (VASCO)
Day Care Centre, Mallapuram
Incomplete Inspection Report. As per the Inspection Report, the project has not been recognised by State Govt. Not recommended.
9 MEA Home Old Age Home, Sellere
Inspection Report is not complete in all respect. Not recommended.
10 Kasthurba Gandhi National Memorial Trust
Old Age Home, Thrissur
Complete list of beneficiaries and Memorandum of Association have not been submitted with the proposal.
Not recommended.
11 Centre for Gerontoligical Studies
Helpline and Counselling Centre, Kochullur
Details of accommodation are not given in the Inspection Report. List of staff and beneficiaries not enclosed. Purpose of accommodation is not mentioned in the rent agreement. Not recommended.
12 Amla Bhawan Charitable Society
Old Age Home, Kottayam
Inspection Report is not complete in all respect. Not recommended.
13 Social Service Industrial Craft Centre
Old Age Home, Kottayam
Inspection Report is not complete in all respect. Copy of the Rent Agreement has not been submitted with the proposal. Not recommended.
14 Multi Service Centre of Aged
Day Care Centre, kollam
Inspection Report is not complete in all respect. Not recommended.
15 Govt. Old Age Home Old Age Home, Kurattimala, Kottayam
Inspection Report has not been signed by the Inspecting Officers. Application form is not in the prescribed proforma. Not recommended.
16 P. Sarojini Amma Smaraka Mahila Samajam
Sensitization programme for school and college students, Mallapuram
Project is not recognised by State Govt. as per SG Inspection Report. Not recommended.
17 Government Old Age Home
Old Age Home, Tavanur, Malappuram
Inspection Report is not complete in all respect. Not recommended.
18 Snehitha Society Mobile Medicare Unit, Palapetta, Palakad
As per the Audited Accounts, no expenditure incurred for running the MMU. Application Form is not in the prescribed proforma. Not recommended.
Annexure-XII
Maharaashtra 2011-12
S. No.
Name of the Organisation Name of Project and location.
Remarks
1 Bhartiya Adim Jati Sevak Sangh Vidarbha Nagpur
Old Age Home, Distt.Nagpur, Maharashtra
Lease agreement is not available with the proposal. Not recommended.
2. Sant Gajanan Maharaj Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Sindewahi Ta. Sindewahi Dist. Chandrapur
Old Age Home, Distt. Chandra Maharashtra
Audited Accounts do not reflect expenditure in running of old age home/welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
3. Bhavteerth Sevabhavi Pratishthan Distt .Aurangabad Maharashtra.
MFCC, Distt. Aurangabad
Application form is not complete. Registered copy of Memorandum of Association has not been submitted with the proposal. Audited Accounts do not reflect expenditure on running of the centre/welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
4 Bhavteerrth Sevabhavi Pratishthan Distt. Aurangabad Maharshtra.
Old Age Home, Distt. Alurangabad.
Application form is not complete. Registered copy of Memorandum of Association has not been submitted with the proposal. Audited Accounts do not reflect expenditure on running of the centre/welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
5. Matoshri Saraswati Mahila Mandal Mehergaon Tal. &Dist. Dhule. Maharshtra.
Day Care Centre for persons with Dementia, Distt. Dhule.
Audit Statement and Annual Report is given for only one year. No experience in the field of age care. Not recommended.
6. Matoshri Sarswati Mahils Mandal Mehergaon Tah.& Dist.Dhule Maharashtra.
Old Age Home, Distt. Dhule
Audit Statement and Annual Report is given for only one year. No experience in the field of age care. Not recommended.
7. Kai.Devidasrao Ghadmode Bahuuddeshiya Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Vitthalnagar, Aurangabad
Old Age Home, Dist. Aurangabad.
Registered copy of the Memorandum of Association has not been submitted with the proposal. Not recommended.
8. Kai Devidasrao Ghadmde Bahuuddeshiya Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Vitthalnagar. Cidco Aurangabad Maharshtra.
MFCC, Distt. Aurangabad
Registered copy of the Memorandum of Association has not been submitted with the proposal. Not recommended.
9. B-Son’s Social Foundation Akoli Tq. Umarkhed Dist. Yavatmal Maharashtra.
MFCC Widowed women, Dist Gadchroli
Papers are incomplete. Not recommended.
10. Kai Eknathrawji Latpate Seva-Bhavi Sanstha, Kodri Tq. Gangakhed Dist.Parbhani (M.S.)
DCC, Distt. Parbhani (M.S.)
Papers are incomplete. Not recommended.
11. Akashada Bahuudeshiya Gramin Wa Shahari Vikas Sanstha, Borgaon (Meghe), Wardha Maharashtra.
DCC, Distt.Wardha.
Original copy of application has not been submitted. As per the Audited Accounts, no expenditure incurred in running the centre/welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
12 Kai. Devidasrao Ghadmode Bahuuddeshiya Shikshan Prasarak , Cidco, Aurangabad .
Day Care Centre for persons with Dementia, Distt. Aunagabad.
Registered copy of the Memorandum of Association has not been submitted with the proposal. Not recommended.
13 Sant Gajanan Maharaj Shikshan Mandal, Sindewahi Tq. Dist. Chandrapur Maharshtra
Day Care Centre for persons with Dementia, Distt. Chandrapur
As per the Audited Accounts, no expenditure incurred in running the centre/welfare activities for senior citizens. There is no mention about the centre in the Annual Report. Not recommended.
14. Lok Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Hingoli Maharshtra
MFCC, Nanded
Annual Reports have not been submitted with the proposal. Not recommended.
15. Indira Mahila Balkalyan & Apang Punarwasan Vikas Mandal, Kapadane Tal., Dist. Dhule Maharshtra
MFCC, Nanddurbur
Rent agreement expired on 31.8.2011. Date of entry of beneficiaries in the centre is not mentioned in the list of beneficiaries. Not recommended.
16. Lok Vikas Pratisthan, Maharashra.
MFCC, Dist.Latur Project proposal is for 2010-11 whereas State Government has recommended for 2011-12. Copy of registered Memorandum of Association has not submitted. Audited Accounts do not reflect expenditure on activities. Not recommended.
17. Iswari Foundation, Yrlgaon Tq. Dist. Buldana Maharashtra.
Old Age Home, Dist. Buldana.
Project proposal is for 2010-11 whereas State Government has recommended for 2011-12. Registered copy of the Memorandum of Association has not been submitted with the proposal. As per the Audited Accounts, no expenditure incurred in running the centre/welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
18. Youth Farmer and Health Social Welfare Society. Dist. Yavatmal (MS)
Physiotherapy Clinic, Dist. Yavatmal (MS)
Date of commencement is August 2010. List of drugs enclosed with the proposal. Why and how can physiotherapy centre prescribe drugs to patients and that too Diezpam.
Expenditure on physiotherapy equipment, maintenance and recurring costs not mentioned in eth audited statement of accounts. Activity of the Centre is not mentioned in the annual Report. Not recommended.
19. Jyotiba Phule Seva Trust. Shivaji Nagar, Nanded (M.S)
Old Age Home, Dist.Parbhani. (MS)
There is no mention about the old age home /welfare activities for senior citizens in the Annual Reports. Not recommended.
20. Shamas Kamar Shikshan Sanstha, Kothali Tq Motala Dist. Buldana.
Old Age Home, Dist.Buldana (M.S.)
Project proposal is for 2010-11 and State Govt. recommendation is for 2011-12. Not recommended.
21. Sainath Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Andhori Tq. Ahmedpur Latur.
Multi Facility Care Centre, Dist. Parbhani
Audited Accounts do not show on the project. Project is not recognized by the State Government. Not recommended.
22. Lokmanya Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, dist Latur
Day Care Centre for persons with Dementia, Dist. Beed
Audited Accounts do not show expenditure in running the centre. Discrepancies in the statement of Accounts. Centre is not recognized by State Government. Not recommended.
23. Lokmanya Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Dist. Latur (M.S.)
Old Age Home, Dist. Latur
Audited Accounts do not show expenditure in running the home. Project is not recognized by the State Government. Discrepancies in the statement of Accounts. Not recommended.
24. Vithai Bahuuddeshiya Sevabhavi Sanstha, Latur
MFCC, Osmanabad
Papers are incomplete. Not recommended.
25. Aai Deomogra Mahila Mandal, Tal. & Dist. Dhule (M.S.)
MFCC, Nandurbar
Recommended.
26. Jogai Mata Sanskrutik, Samajik Shaikshanik Mandal, Kapadane Tal. & Dhule.
Physiotherapy Clinict, Dist. Dhule
Recommended.
27. Kai Eknathrawji Latpate Seva-Bhavi Sanstha, Kodri Tq. Gangakhed Dist.Parbhani (M.S.)
Old Age Home, Distt. Parbhani (M.S.),
Papers are incomplete. Not recommended.
28. Yuva Gram Vikas Mandal. Dist. Beed, (M.S.)
Old Age Home, Dist. Beed, (M.S.)
Project proposal is for 2010-11 whereas State Government has recommended for 2011-12. As per the Audited Accounts, no expenditure incurred in running the centre/welfare activities for senior
citizens. There is no mention about the centre in the Annual Report. Not recommended.
29. Uday Adiwasi Vikas Bahuuddeshiya Sanstha, Yavatmal Tq, Dist.Yavatmal (M.S.)
DCC, Dist.Wardha
Papers are complete. Recommended.
30. Swami Vivekanand Gramin Dist.Latur (M.S.)
Old Age Home, Dist. Latur (M.S.)
Papers are complete. Recommended.
31. Jeevan Vikas Pratisthan, Aurangabad (M.S.)
Old Age Home, Dist. Aurangabad (M.S.)
Registered copy of the Memorandum of Association has not been submitted with the proposal. As per the Audited Accounts, no expenditure incurred in running the centre/welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
32. Swapna Sakar Bahuuddeshiya Shikshan Sanstha, Tq.Ner Dist, Yavatmal (M.S.)
DCC, Dist. Yavatmal.(M.S.)
Papers are complete. Recommended.
33. Janhit Bahuuddeshiya Sanstha, Amravati Tq. & Dist. Amravati (M.S.)
Old Age Home, Dist. Amravati.(M.S.)
Project proposal is for 2010-11 whereas State Government recommendation is for 2011-12. Not recommended.
34. Shivshakti Pratishthan, Mehergaon Tal. Dist. Dhule (m.S.)
Old Age Home, Jalgaon
Complete registered copy of the Memorandum of Association has not been submitted with the proposal. Not recommended.
35 . SatymevJayate Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Jaripatka Nagpur
MFCC, Dist. Nagpur
Incomplete Inspection Report has been submitted. Not recommended.
36. Swami Vivekanand Gramin Vikas Sanstha, Andhori Tq.Ahmedpur Dist.Latur.
Old Age Home, Dist. Latur.
Papers are complete. Recommended.
37. Shree Dutta Gramin va Shahari Vidya Prasarak Mandal, Wankhade Nagar, Dabki, Akola (M.S.)
MFCC, Akola
22 beneficiaries out of 51 are below 60 years old. No work in the field. Not recommended.
38. Vatsalya Sindhu Mahila Bahuuddeshiya Sevabhavi Sanstha, Latur.(M.S.)
Physiotherapy Clinic, Osma nabad
Registered copy of the Memorandum of Association has not been submitted. As per the Audited Accounts, no expenditure has been incurred on the centre/welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
39. Mahalaxmi Bahu Uddeshya Day Care Centre As per the Audited Accounts, no
Shikshan Sanstha, Aurangabad (M.S.)
for persons with Dementia, Dist. Aurangabad
expenditure has been incurred on the centre/welfare activities for senior citizens. Aims and objectives of the organization as mentioned in the Memorandum of Association do not include welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
40. Marathi Vaibhav Shikshan Samajik Sanstha, Wardha.
Old Age Home, Dist. Wardh .
Date of commencement is April 2010. 50 residents living in 1450 sq. ft. area. Expenditure on old age home is not getting reflected in the Audited statement of accounts. Not Recommended.
41. Swami Vivekanand Gramin Vikas Sanstha Andhori Tq. Ahmedpur Dist Latur
MFCC, Dist.Latur(M.S.)
Papers are incomplete. Not recommended.
42. Panchil Magasvargiya Bahuuddeshiya Sevabhai Sanstha, Latur,
Old Age Home, Dist. Latur
As per the Audited Accounts, no expenditure has been incurred on the centre/welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
43. Shree Khodiyar Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Pusad Tq. Pisad. Yavatmal(M.S.)
MFCC, Dist. Parbani
Date of Commencement is May 2010. 45 residents present at the time of inspection in a premises of 4250 sq. Ft. Annual report has a much generalized account of the Centre. Not recommended.
44. Shree Khodiyar Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Pusad Tq. Pisad. Yavatmal(M.S.)
Day Care Centre for persons with Dementia, Dist.Gadchiroli
As per the Audited Accounts, no expenditure has been incurred on the centre/welfare activities for senior citizens. There is no mention about the centre in the Annual Report. Not recommended.
45. Late Laxmanrao Chinnawar Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Akoli Tq. Umarkhed Yavatmal .(M.S.)
Day Care Centre for persons with Dementia, Dist. Parbani (M.S.)
Date of Commencement of the project is June 2010. 20 patients were present at the time of Inspection. All the beneficiaries joined the Centre in April-May 2011. Doctor with BAMS degree is shown in the list of employees of the Centre. Annual report has a general description of the Centre. Not recommended.
46. Sane Guruji Shikshan Sanstha, Mother Teresa, Gopal Nagar, Sangvi, Nanded-5, (M.S.)
Widows Women, Nanded-5. (M.S.)
Date of Commencement of the project is April 2009. 47 residents were present at the time of inspection. However, space available for the Home is inadequate. Audited Statement of Accounts shows details of expenditure.
Not recommended.
47. Bhimlpen Aadiwasi Gramvikas Sanstha, Mohda Tq. Kelapur Dist.Yavatmal (M.S.)
MFCC, Dist.Wardha,
Date of Commencement is June 2010. 42 residents present at the time of Inspection. Area of the premi9ses is 4250 Sq. Ft. annual report and Audited Statement of Accounts gives details. Recommended.
48. Jijamata Mahila Mandal, Kanshivani,Tq. Dist. Akola. (M.S.)
MFCC, Tq. & Dist. Akola.
Complete registered Memorandum of Association has not been submitted. Not recommended.
49. Vidarbha Bahuuddeshiya Seva Samiti, Wani Tq. Dist. Yavatmal. (M.S.)
MFCC, Dist. Chanderpur.
Details of beneficiaries have not been properly indicated in the Inspection Report. No activity regarding running of the centre/welfare activities for senior citizens has been mentioned in the Annual Reports. Not recommended.
50. Late Ganptrao Ahir Bahuddeshiya Shikshan Sanstha, Buldana, Tq. Dist. Buldana, (M.S.)
OAH, Dist. Buldana,
Original copy and complete Inspection Report has not been submitted. Not recommended.
51. Hari Krupa Bahuuddeshiya Sevabhavi Sanstha, Tq. Ambajogai Dist. Beed (M.S.)
Day Care Centre for persons with Dementia, Tq. Ambajogai Dist. Beed
As per the Audited Accounts, no expenditure has been incurred on the centre/welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
52. Dongar Tukai Vikas Pratishthan , Dist. Parbhani. (M.S.)
Day Care Centre for persons with Dementia, Dist. Beed,
Aims and objectives of the organization as mentioned in the Memorandum of Association do not include welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
53. Samta Gramvikas Bahuuddeshiya Sanstha, Mohda Tq. Kelapur Dist. Yavatmal (M.S.)
Day Care Centre for persons with Dementia, Dist. Chanderpur,
Aims and objectives of the organization as mentioned in the Memorandum of Association do not include welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
54. Shri Ganesh Shikshan Prasark Madal, Aundha, Tq. Aundha Dist. Hingoli. (M.S.)
OAH, Dist. Hingoli.
As per the Audited Accounts, no expenditure has been incurred on the centre/welfare activities for senior citizens. Copies of Annual Reports have not been submitted. Not recommended.
55. Vidarbha Bahuuddeshiya Seva Samiti Tq.Zari. Dist. Yavatmal. (M.S.)
Day Care Centre for persons with Dementia, Dist. Yavatmal.
Date of Commencement is August 2010. 20 older persons were present at the time of inspection. Annual report has a general account on the Centre and
nothing on mental health. List of employees include ANMs besides a general physician. Not recommended.
56. Sharda Shaikshanik & Gramin Vikas Sanstha, Dhule, Tal. Dist. Dhule. (M.S.)
OAH, Dist. Dhule.
There is no mention about the centre in the Annual Report. Not recommended.
57. Santh Shiromani Vandaniy.Gadagababa Bahudeshiya Gram Vikas Sanstha, Dist Wardha. (M.S.)
DCC, Dist Wardha.
As per the Audited Accounts, no expenditure has been incurred on the centre/welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
58. Shri Saptashrungi Mahila Vikas Mandal. Dist. Nandurbar.(M.S.)
Day Care Centre for persons with Dementia, Dist. Nandurbar.
There is a mismatch in the Inspection Report and Application form. Report states Sensitization of School Students and the application form states Dementia Day Care Centre. The budget attached with the application form is for Physiotherapy Clinic. List of Employees includes ANMs. Annual report gives general description of Dementia Day Care Centre. Not recommended.
59. Shri Saptashrungi Mahila Vikas Mandal. Dist. Nandurbar.(M.S.)
Sensitzation of School/ College Students (Older Person), Dist. Nandurbar
19 patients present at the time of Inspection. Doctor with BAMS degree shown in the list of employees. List of beneficiaries not enclosed with the proposal. Not recommended.
60. Vittal Rukmini Sevabhavi Sanstha. Dist. Beed, (M.S.)
Day Care Centre for persons with Dementia, Dist. Beed,
Photocopy of the application has been submitted. Aims and objectives of the organization as mentioned in the Memorandum of Association do not include welfare activities for senior citizens. As per the Audited Accounts, no expenditure has been incurred on the centre/welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
61. Shree Mahila Bal Kalyan & Apang Punarvasn Vikas Mandal Dhule Tq. & Dist. Dhule. (M.S.)
Day Care Centre for persons with Dementia, Dist. Dhule.
Date of Commencement is 2008. 20 patients were present at the time of inspection. The annual report gives a brief general description of the Centre. Dimension of the premises is not enclosed. There is a list of medicines enclosed with the application that needs to be authenticated by a medical expert. Not recommended.
62. Gram Vikas Bahuuddeshiya OAH, Tah.& Date of Commencement is 2007. 25
Sanstha, Jalgaon, Tah. Dist. Jalgaon (M.S.)
Dist. Jalgaon residents were present at the time of inspection. Annual Report has a general paragraph on the Centre. Dimension of the premises is not enclosed with the proposal. Audited Statement of Accounts do not show details of expenditure. Not recommended.
63 Magaswwargiyya Mahila Vikas Mandal, Ahmednagar
MFCC, Ahmednagar
Date of Commencement April 2009. 50 residents present at the time of inspection. Area of the premises is 2400 sq ft. Same general description of the Centre in the Annual report. Audited Statement of Accounts show inadequate expenditure. Not recommended.
64 Ashirwad Shaikshanik & Samajik Sanastha, Latur, Mah.
Helpline & Counseling Centre, Osmanabad
Date of Commencement is 2008. 40 beneficiaries were present at the time of inspection. Dedicated telephone line is not mentioned for the purpose. List of beneficiaries does not show any new cases. Activity not reflected in Annual Report and Audited Statement of Accounts. Not recommended.
65 Late Bhikajirao Alia Dada Jagattap Pratisthan, Pune
Day Care Centre for persons with Dementia, Pune
Date of Commencement is 2008. 20 patients present at the time of inspection. Area of the premises is 1650 Sq. Ft. List of employees and beneficiaries not available. Annual report gives a general account of activity of the Centre. Audited Statement of Accounts do not show adequate expenditure. Not recommended.
Annexure-XIII MAHARAASHTRA. 2010-11 Sl. No.
Name of the Organization
Name of Project and location.
Remarks
1. Janseva Foundation , Pune, Sanghvi Complex.
Multi-Service Centre, Pune
Rent agreement and staff list are not available, Not recommended.
2 Janseva Foundation , Pune, Sanghvi Complex.
RRTC, Pune
Staff list and list of Managing committee are not available. Not recommended.
3 Janseva Foundation , Pune, Sanghvi Complex.
Old Age Home, Pune
Rent agreement and staff list are not avail ale. Not recommended.
4. Jansseva Foundation , Pune, Sanghvi Complex.
Physiotheraphy, Pune
The date of commencement is 2009. Date of commencement of the project is shown as Apr. 2009. The list of beneficiary is enclosed. However, annual Report and audited statement of accounts for 2009-10 is not available for verification. Not recommended.
5. Late Laxmanrao Chinnawar Shikshan Prasarak Mandal.
DCC for dementia, Parbani
Date of Commencement of the project is June 2010. All the beneficiaries joined the Centre in April-May 2011 as per the proposal for 2011-12. Doctor with BAMS degree is shown in the list of employees of the Centre. Annual report has a general description of the Centre. Not recommended.
6. Indira Mahila Bal Kalyan & Apang Punravasan Vikas Mandal.
DCC with dementia, Dhule
Date of entry of beneficiaries into the centre has not been mentioned in the list of beneficiaries. Rent agreement has expired 30.9.2011. Not recommended.
7 Azad Shikshan Prasarak Sanstha, Latur
DCC with dementia, Jalana
Budget Estimate submitted is for Physiotherapy Clinic. Date of entry of beneficiaries in the centre is not mentioned in the list of beneficiaries. Not recommended.
8. Jogaimata Krushi Gramin Vikas Sevabhavi Sanstha, Arungabad
DCC with dementia, Arungabad
No date of entry of beneficiaries in the centre given in the list of beneficiaries. Rent amount mentioned in the Inspection Report does not tally with the rent agreement. Not recommended.
9. Jogai Mata Sanskrutik, Samajik, Shaikshanik
DCC with dementia,
Application is not complete. Audited Accounts do not show expenditure on
Mandal, Dhule, Thane Thane running of DCC with dementia. Date of entry of beneficiaries not given in the list of beneficiaries. Not recommended.
10. Late Ranubai Bahu, Uykarasha Mandal, Dhule
DCC with dementia, Dhule
Audited statement does not show the expenditure on OAH. Not recommended.
11 Late Ranubai Bahu, Utkarasha Mandal, Jalgaon
DCC with dementia, Jalgaon
Audited statement do not show the exepd. Not recommended.
12 Saraswati Mahila Mandal, Latur
DCC of older persons with Dementia, Solapur
Audited Accounts do not show expenditure on the project. Most of the beneficiaries has been entered the centre in April 2010. Not recommended.
13 VidarbhaBahuSeva Samiti, Wanj,Yawatmal
DCC of older persons with Dementia, Yawatmal
Date of commencement is August 2010. 20 older persons were present at the time of inspection. Annual Report has a general account on the centre and nothing on mental health. List of employees include ANMs besides a general physician. Not recommended.
14 Shri Khodiyar Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Yavatmal
MFCC for older Widowed Women, Parabhani
Proposal also received for 2011-12. Date of Commencement is May 2010. 45 residents present at the time of inspection in a premises of 4250 sq. Ft. Annual report has a much generalized account of the Centre. Not recommended.
15 Lok Vikas Pratishthan, Latur, Solapur
MFCC for older Widowed Women, Solapur
Budget Estimate is not as per the Scheme. Date of entry of all beneficiaries in the centre is in April 2010. Staff engaged is not as per the Scheme. Not recommended.
16 Jogai Mata Sanskrutik, Samajik Shaikshanik Mandal, Dhule, Thane
Physiotherapy clinics, Thane
Proposal for 2011-12 has been recommended.
17 Shri Satya Sai Seva Sanskrutik, samajik, shaikshanik mandal, Jalgaon
Physiotherapy clinics, Aurangabad
Name of owner of the building given in the Inspection Report does not tally with rent agreement. Date of entry of beneficiaries in the centre is not mentioned in the list of beneficiaries. Audited Accounts do not show expenditure on the project. Not recommended.
18 Jogeshwari Gramin Vikas Sevabhavi Sanstha, Dhule
Physiotherapy clinics, Dhule
List of Managing Committee not enclosed. Date of entry of beneficiaries in the clinic is not mentioned in the list of beneficiaries. Not recommended.
19 Jagriti Mahila Unnati Mandal, Khordad, Dhule
DCC, Dhule
In Inspection Report date shows overwriting Application form shows the 2009-10. Not recommended.
20 Maulana Mohanmmed All Johar Multipurpose Education & Soc. Chilkhali, Buldana
O ld Age Home, Buldana
MOA & Annual report do not show welfare for Olders Persons. & List of beneficiaries are also not in prescribed proforma. Recommended subject to submission of all requisite document.
21 Lok Vikas Pratishthan, Latur
Help Line & Counseling, Solapur
Help line number has not been given. Audited Accounts do not show expenditure in running the centre. Not recommended.
22 Adarshajivan Bahu, Sanstha, Osmanabad, Solapur
Old Age Home, Solapur
MOA is not enclosed. Not recommended.
23 MahalamiBahu, Shikshan Sanstha, Auranagabad
DCC of older persons with Dementia, Auranagabad
Audited statement do not show the exepd. Not recommended.
24 Shah Education & Welfare Society,
Old Age Home, Auranagabad
MOA & Annual report not shows welfare for Olders List of beneficiaries are also not in prescribed proforma. Not recommended.
25 Vikas Bahuuddeshiya Sevabhavi Sanstha, Latur
Old Age Home Latur
MOA & Annual report not shows welfare for Olders. Not recommended.
26 Shivshakti Pratosjtjam. Mehergapm. Tal. Distt. Dhule
Old Age Home Jalgaon
MOA do not shows welfare for Olders. Not recommended.
27 Gurdas Seva ashram,Gurudas Nagar Ambajogai Distt. Beed.
Old Age Home, Beed.
All documents submitted photocopies. Not recommended.
28 Gurdas Seva ashram Ambajogai Gurudas Nagar Distt. Beed.
MFCC for older Widowed Women, Beed.
Audited statement & Rent agreement is submitted photocopy. Not recommended.
29 Swami Vivekanand Gramin Vikas Sanstha, Latur
Old Age Home, Latur
Proposal also received for 2011-12 which has been recommended.
30 Swami Vivekanand Gramin Vikas Sanstha, Latur
MFCC for older Widowed Women, Latur
Papers are incomplete. Not recommended.
31 Sau. Balwatrao Jadha Bahu. Gramin Vikas Sanstha, Buldhana
Old Age Home, Buldhana
Inspection Report is about another Scheme for SC, ST students. Date of commencement has been given as 2010 but the Annual Report and Audited Statement of Accounts for relevant years are not enclosed for verification. Not recommended.
32 Sane Guruji Shikshan Sanstha, Parbahni
Old Age Home, Parbahni
Application is not in prescribed proforma. Not recommended.
33 Ramrao Munde Seva Bhavi Sanstha, Beed
Old Age Home, Beed.
Date of commencement is 2008. 25 residents were present at the time of inspection. Total area is 4800 sq. ft. Rent agreement is valid upto 2011. All the residents have been living there from 2008. Audited Statement of Accounts do not give details of expenditure. Not recommended.
34 Narsing Naik Shikshan Prasarak Mandal
MFCC for older Widowed Women, Akola
Date of commencement is 2010. 50 residents were present at the time of inspection. Total area 522 sq. mtrs. Annual Report for 2008-09 does not give details accounts of MFCC. Audit Accounts do not give details of expenditure. Not recommended.
35 Anjiman-e-Islamiya Bahu, Shasishan Sanstha, Bulanda
Old Age Home, Buldhana
List of beneficiaries is not in prescribed proforma. Not recommended.
36 Durga Mahila Mandal, Nagpur
Old Age Home, Nagpur
All documents submitted for 2008-09 & Annual Report is not available. Not recommended.
37 Ankush Dnyandeep Mahila Mandal, Nagpur
Old Age Home, Nagpur
Application shows for the year 2008-09 Staff list 2009-10. Annual Report is not available. Not recommended.
38 Tuljabhavani Gramin Vikas Sevabhavi Sanstha, Beed
Old Age Home, Beed.
Application & Staff list is not in format. Annual Report do not show welfare of older persons. Not recommended.
39 Late KishanraoMane Pratishthan, Beed
Old Age Home, Beed.
MOA is not enclosed. Not recommended.
40 Shri Vitthal Rukmini Sevabhavi Sanstha,
Old Age Home, Beed.
Date of commencement is 2009. 23 residents were present at the time of
Pokhari, Beed inspection. Annual Reports, Audit Statement of Accounts, rent agreement and map of the building not found enclosed. Not recommended.
41 Bhagvan Baha Bahuuddeshiy Sevabhavi Sanstha, Beed
Old Age Home, Beed.
Date of commencement is April 2009. 20 residents were present at the time of inspection. Annual Report enclosed with the proposal does not mentioned old age home. Details of expenditure not reflected in the Audit Statement of Accounts. Not recommended.
42..
Dongar Tukai Gram Vikas Pratishthan, Parbhani
DCC of older persons with Dementia, Beed
Proposal also received for 2011-12. Date of commencement is May 2008. 20 patients were present at the time of inspection. General physician is shown in the list of employees for the centre. Beneficiaries list only for 2009-10 and shows 40 patients. Furniture and list of equipments enclosed that included beds, bedding etc. which seems irrelevant for the facility. Annual report has one general paragraph on the centre. Recommended.
43 Radharani Bahi, Vikas Pratishthan, Parbhani
DCC, Parbhani
Date of Commencement of the Project is not mentioned in the Inspection Report. 41 beneficiaries were present at time of inspection. Audited statement of Accounts does not reflect the expenditure of activities of Older persons. No activity is reflected on older Persons in the Annual Report. Not recommended.
44 Late Kishanrao Mane Pratishthan, Beed
DCC, Beed.
Date of Commencement of the Project is April 2009. 40 beneficiaries were present at time of inspection. Dimension of the Centre is mentioned, but Map of the building is not enclosed. Rent agreement is valid up to Dec. 2010. Expenditure of the activity of older persons is not reflected in the audited statement of accounts. No activity is reflected on older Persons in the Annual Report Not recommended.
45 Pandurang Seva Sanstha, Parbhani
DCC, Parbhani
Date of Commencement of the Project is not mentioned in the
inspection Report. 40 beneficiaries were present at time of inspection. Annual Report does not reflect the activities on age care. Expenditure on the project is not reflected in the audited statement of accounts. Not recommended.
46 Tuljabhavani Gramin Vikas Sevabhavi Sanstha, Beed
Help Line & Counseling, Beed.
The date of commencement is April 2009. 20 people were present at the time of inspection. Audited statement of accounts should be checked by the representative of Finance Dept. Annual Report does not reflect the details of activities. Not recommended.
47 Tuljabhavani Gramin Vikas Sevabhavi Sanstha, Beed
MFCC for older Widowed Women, Beed.
It is a Prospective Project. 40 people were present at the time of inspection. Rent agreement should be checked carefully as this is shown by the organization for another proposal as well. Map of the building is not given. Audited statement of accounts should be checked by the representative of Finance Dept. Annual Report does not reflect the details of activities. Not recommended.
48 Late Ranubai Bahu, Utkarasha Mandal, Dhule, Nandurbar
MFCC for older Widowed Women, Nandurbar
Annual Report does not show the elder persons. Not recommended.
49 Shri Ganesh Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Aundha , Distt. Hingoli
OAH, Parbhani
Staff list is not as per scheme. Not recommended.
50 Priydarshani Mahila Mandal Purna Distt. Parbhani
OAH, Parbhani
Staff list is not as per scheme. Not recommended.
51 Tuljabhavani Gramin Vikas Sevabhavi Sanstha, Beed
Physiotherapy clinics, Beed
It is a prospective project proposal. Details of accommodation are not given in the Inspection Report. No original application submitted. Staff is not as per the Scheme. Audited Accounts do not show expenditure in running the clinic. Not recommended.
52 Bhagvan Baha Bahuuddeshiy Sevabhavi Sanstha, Beed
DCC, Beed
Staff list is not as per scheme. photocopy of audit statement. Not recommended.
53 Yashwantrao Samaj Vikas Pratishtan, Latur
Help Line & Counseling,
Staff list & beneficiaries are not in prescribed profroma.
Latur Not recommended. 54 Yeshwantrai Chavan
Samaj Vikas Pratisthan, Latur
OAH, Latur
Beneficiaries are not in prescribed profroma & Annual Report do not show the welfare older persons. Not recommended.
55 Prem Deep Bahu, Sanstha, Wardha
DCC Wardha
In IR col.no.3 show blank & staff list is not available. Not recommended.
56 Ashirwad Shaikshanik & Samajik Sanstha, Latur
Help Line & Counseling, Osamabad
Proposal also received for 2011-12 Not recommended.
57 Vithai Bahuuddeshiya Sevabhavi Sanstha, Latur
MFCC for older Widowed Women, Osamabad
Proposal also received for 2011-12. Not recommended.
58 Vitthal Rukmini Sevabhavi Sanstha Beed
DCC with Dementia, Beed
Date of Commencement is April 2009. 18 patients present at the time of inspection. There is no specific mention of the activity in the Annual report. The audited statement of Accounts does not show expenditure on the Centre. Dimension of the premises is not available. Not recommended.
59 Shri Krishna Mahila BalKlyan & Apang Punvasan Viaks Mandal, Jalgaon, Jalana
Physiotherapy clinics, Jalana
Date of Commencement is December 2008. 50 patients present at the time of inspection. General physician is shown as physiotherapist in the list of employees. Audited Statement of Accounts does not show expenditure on physiotherapy equipments or maintenance or recurring expenditure. Not recommended.
60 Maharashtra Rajya Sarkari Abhiyoktra Kalyan, Parishad, Jalgoan
Construction of Old Age Home, Jalgoan
Documents Shows the construction of Old Age Home. Not recommended.
61 Shree Tirupati Charitable Trust, Latur,
Multi Care Centre for Older Women, Hingoli
Date of commencement not mentioned in the Inspection Report. 48 residents were reported present at the time of inspection. Annual report and Audited Statement of Accounts does not give details on the Centre. Rent agreement and dimensions of the premises not available. Not recommended.
62 Shree Tirupati Charitable Trust, Latur,
Multi Care Centre for Older Women, Parbhani
Date of commencement not mentioned in the Inspection Report. 48 residents were reported present at the time of inspection. Annual report and Audited
Statement of Accounts does not give details on the Centre. Rent agreement and dimensions of the premises not available. Not recommended.
63 Rashtra Santa Tukodojisantha, Wanjari Ward, Gadchiroli, Yawatmal
DCC of older persons with Dementia, Gadchiroli
Date of commencement of the project is April 2008. 20 patients found at the time of inspection. Doctor with BAMS degree shown in the list of employees. List of patients is only for the year 2008-09. Annual report only has general description of the Centre. Audited statement of accounts should be thoroughly checked. Recommended.
64 Youth Farmer and Health Social Welfare Society, Yavatmal
Physiotherapy clinics, Yavatmal
Proposal also received for 2011-12. Not recommended.
65 Bajrang Research Foundation A/P Mahasanghvi Tq. Patoda Distt. Beed
RRTC, Beed
Recommendation letter of State Govt. says RRTC and application form states OAH. List of employees shows only counsellors. Annual report and Audited Statement of Accounts does not reflect activity or expenditure on old age home. Not recommended. Not recommended.
Annexure-XIV Meghalya
S. No.
Name of the Organisation
Name of Project and location
Remarks
1 Marry Our Help Training Centre
Multi Service Centre/Day Care Centre, Shillong
Original Inspection Report and Application has not been submitted. All required documents to be furnished with the proposal has not been submitted. Not recommended.
Annexure-XV Madhya Pradesh
S. No.
Name of the Organisation
Name of Project and location
Remarks
1. Sarswati Sahitya Sangam Maheshwar (khargone)
OAH, Kasrawad
It is a prospective project. The documents provided by the organization does not clearly state the activities conducted for benefit of older people. The amount spent on old age programmes is very small. The overall total budget of the organization is too small to run an old age home. Not recommended.
2. Sarswati Sahitya Sabgam Maheshwar (Khagoane)
OAH, Maheswar
It is a prospective project. The documents provided by the organization does not clearly state the activities conducted for benefit of older people. The amount spent on old age programmes is very small. The overall total budget of the organization is too small to run an old age home. Not recommended.
3. New Pratap Shiksha Samiti Sehore
OAH, Distt. Sehore
Inspection Report is not in prescribed performa. As per the Audited Accounts no expenditure incurred in running of old age home/welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
4. Gopal Das Sarvjanik Kalyan Samiti Manikoot, Sidhi
OAH, Distt. Manikoot Sidhi(M.P.)
Inspection report is not complete. Audited Accounts do not show detailed expenditure on welfare Activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
5. Lok Kalyan Jan Sabha Samiti Shahalpur,
OAH, Distt. Shajapur (M.P)
It is a prospective project proposal. Inspection Report is incomplete. Original copy of the application has not been submitted.
Not recommended. 6. Prarmod Adivasi Vikas
Parishad Ranjhi Jabalpur
OAH, Distt jabalpur
Rent agreement is not available. Not recommended.
7 Kalyan Mitra Samiti Indore
OAH, Distt Indore
Inspection report is not in prescribed proforma. Audited Accounts and Annual Reports do not reflect activities undertaken for the welfare of senior citizens/running of the old age home. Not recommended.
8 Society for Maximizing and Rural Technology Khandwa
OAH, Distt. Khandwa
Inspection report is not in prescribed proforma. Audited Accounts and Annual Reports do not reflect activities undertaken for the welfare of senior citizens/running of the old age home. Not recommended.
9 Vishal Satpura Utthan Samiti Uddan, Betul
OAH, Distt. Betul
Inspection report is not in prescribed proforma. Audited Accounts and Annual Reports do not reflect activities undertaken for the welfare of senior citizens/running of the old age home. Not recommended.
10 Nivedita Kalyan Samiti Manas Nagar Reva
MFCC Distt. Rewa,
The project is proposed to be undertaken on receipt of grant. Not recommended.
11 Nivedita Kalyan Samiti Manas Nagar Reva
MMU, Distt. Rewa
The project is proposed to be undertaken on receipt of grant. Not recommended.
12 Nivedita Kalyan Samiti Manas Nagat Reva
DCC Dementia, Distt. Rewa
The project is proposed to be undertaken on receipt of grant. Not recommended.
13 Nivedita Kalyan Samiti Manas Nagar Reva
Helpline, Distt. Reva
The organization is only running training programmes for caring for older persons. The organization has done some activities on older person but details are not provided in the Annual Report. Consolidated expenditure on these activities is also mentioned in the Audited Accounts. The Annual Report for the year 2011-12 states in some detail of running of an old age home but the expenditure details are not given. Not recommended.
14 Nivedita Kalyan Samiti Manas Nagar Reva
MSC, Distt. Reva
The organization is only running training programmes for caring for older persons. The organization has done some activities on older person but details are not provided in the Annual Report. Consolidated expenditure on these activities is also mentioned in the Audited
Accounts. The Annual Report for the year 2011-12 states in some detail of running of an old age home but the expenditure details are not given. Not recommended.
15 New Shivam Vayavasayik Parishikshan Mandal Hoshangabad
OAH, Distt. Hoshangabad
Audited Accounts do not show details of expenditure incurred on welfare activities for senior citizens. Inspection Report is not in the prescribed format. Not recommended.
16 Lok Shiksha Evam Prakshikshan Samiti Khandwa(M.P.)
RRTC, Distt. Khandwa
Inspection report is not in prescribed proforma. Audited Accounts and Annual Reports do not reflect activities undertaken for the welfare of senior citizens/running of the old age home. Not recommended.
17 Ambica Shiksha Samaj Kalyan Samiti Alirajpur(M.P.)
HLC, Distt. Alirajpur
Audited Accounts and Annual Reports do not reflect activities undertaken for the welfare of senior citizens/running of the old age home. Not recommended.
18 Gram Seva Trust Pataleshwar Chhindwara (M.P.).
MSC & Help line and C, Distt. Chhindwara
The organization has submitted proposal for both the projects in one application. The organization do not have adequate experience in the field of ageing. Not recommended.
19 Gram Seva Trust. Patleshwar Chhindwara (M.P.)
OAH, Distt. Chhindwara
No dedicated telephone line is available. The Audited Accounts do not show details of expenditure. Not recommended.
20 Lalit Shiksha Samiti Narsinghpur (M.P.)
DCC Dementia, Distt. Jabalpur
The project is proposed to be undertaken on receipt of grant. Not recommended.
21 Abhinav Shiksha Kalyan Samiti Narsinghpur (M.P.)
MFCCWidow, Distt. Jabalpur
The project is proposed to be undertaken on receipt of grant. Not recommended.
22 Indian Red Cross Society, Ratlam (M.P.
OAH, Distt Ratlam
Inspection report is not in prescribed proforma. Audited Accounts and Annual Reports do not reflect activities undertaken for the welfare of senior citizens/running of the old age home. Not recommended.
Annexure-XVI
MIZORAM
S.No.
Name of the Organisastion
Name of the project and location
Remarks
1. Mizoram Upa Panel (M.U.P.) Electric Veng Unit, Aizawl
DCC, Electric Veng, Aizqwl
All required documents have not been submitted with the proposal. As per Audited Accounts, no expenditure in running programmes for senior citizens. Not recommended.
2. Mizoram Upa Panel (M.U.P.) Electric Veng Unit, Aizawl
DCC, Bawngkawn unit
All required documents have not been submitted with the proposal. As per Audited Accounts, no expenditure in running programmes for senior citizens. Not recommended.
3. Mizoram Upa Panel (M.U.P.) Electric Veng Unit, Aizawl
DCC, Chhinga veng Aizawl, Mizoram
All required documents have not been submitted with the proposal. As per Audited Accounts, no expenditure in running programmes for senior citizens. Not recommended.
Annexure-XVII NAGALAND
S. No.
Name of the Organisastion
Name of the project and location
Remarks
1. Cultivator Multipurpose society
Old Age Home, Tuli, Distt; Mokokchung
Inspection Report is 2010-11 whereas State Government recommendation is for 2011-12. All requisite documents as per the Scheme have not been submitted. Not recommended.
2. Association for development of society, Middle Chandmari, Kohima
Old Age Home, Kohima
Annual Report and Audited Accounts only for one year i.e.2010-11 has been submitted. Application for the grant has not been submitted. Copies of the rent agreement, registration certificate, Memorandum of Association and list of beneficiaries have not been submitted.
Not recommended. 3 Enyathung women
society, Soku village, wokha
Old Age Home, Soku, Wokha
Annual Report and Audited Accounts only for one year i.e.2010-11 has been submitted. Application for the grant has not been submitted. Copies of the rent agreement, registration certificate, Memorandum of Association and list of beneficiaries have not been submitted. Not recommended.
4 Haimrai society,Duiringreu Colony, Peren
Old Age Home, Meluri town, Distt. Phek
Recommended.
Annexure-XVIII ORISSA
S. No.
Name of the Organisastion
Name of the project and location.
Remarks
1. Jay Kishan Youth Club, Puri, Orissa
Mobile Medicare Unit, Puri
Annual report and Audited Accounts for one year only i.e.for 2010-11 is available. Not recommended.
2. Juba Jyoti Jubak Sangha Old Age Home, Subarnapur(Sonepur)
No beneficiary is found at the time of inspection as per the Inspection Report. The rent agreement has expired in December 2010. Not recommended.
3. JanKalyan Seva Sansthan
Old Age Home, Nuapada
The project is running since 1st April, 2010. 15 beneficiaries were found at the time of Inspection. The list of beneficiaries and staff is enclosed with the proposal. However, the rent agreement submitted found to be valid only up to December 2010. Not recommended.
4. Association for Social Reconstructive Activities(ASRA)
Physiotherapy Clinic, Jagatsinghpur
It is a Prospective Project. Not recommended.
5. Neelanchal Seva Pratisthan
Physiotherapy Clinic, Puri
Details of staff employed and beneficiaries are enclosed. Audited statement of accounts do not properly reflect expenditure incurred. Not recommended.
6. Community Action for Reconstruction and Empowerment(CARE)
Physiotherapy Clinic, Sundargarh
List of beneficiaries has not been submitted. No activity in audited accounts and Annual report. Not recommended.
7. Mahila Unayan Pathaghar
Sensitizing programmes for children in Schools and Colleges, Bhadrak
No activity in audited accounts and Annual report. Annual Report for 2010-11 only has been submitted. Not recommended.
8. Neelanchal Seva Pratisthan
Sensitizing programmes for children in Schools and Colleges, Puri
Details of expenditure not available. Not Recommended.
9. Association for Voluntary Action
Training of Caregivers to the older persons, Puri
Annual report and audited accounts available for 2010-11 only has been submitted. Not recommended.
10. Juba Jyoti Jubak Sangha
Training of Caregivers to the older persons, Sonepur
Inspection Report is not complete. Legible copies of registration certificate and Audited Accounts have not been submitted. Not recommended.
11. Rural Development Action Cell
Training of Caregivers to the older persons, Mayurbhanj
List of beneficiaries are enclosed. Not recommended.
12. Basudev Pathaghar Helpline & Counselling Centre, Cuttack
List of beneficiaries is not available. Not recommended.
13. Jan Kalyan Seva Sanstha
Helpline & Counseling Centre, Nuapada
List of beneficiaries is not available. Not recommended.
14. Neelanchal Seva Pratisthan
Helpline & Counseling Centre, Puri
Help line number has not been given. Not recommended.
15. Association for Voluntary Action
Helpline & Counseling Centre, Puri
It is a prospective project. List of beneficiaries has not submitted. Not recommend.
16. Padmashree Society Helpline & Counseling Centre, Khurda
Copies of Annual reports has not been submitted. Not recommended.
17. Basudev Pathaghar Multi facility Care Centres for destitute older widow women, Cuttack
There is no mention about the centre in the Annual Report. No expenditure shown in running the centre in the Audited Accounts.
Not recommended.
18. DARIA Multi facility Care Centres for destitute older widow women, Jagatsinghnagar
Audited Accounts do not reflect activities undertaken for senior citizen. Not recommended.
19. Public Welfare Organisation
Multi facility Care Centres for destitute older widow women, Jagatsinghnagar
No expenditure shown In accounts. Not recommended.
20. National Instt. Of Tribal Welfare & Social Action
Multi facility Care Centres for destitute older widow women, Nayagarh
The project is running. 49 beneficiaries were found at the time of Inspection. The total area available for the project is 2262 qr. feet. The list of beneficiaries and staff is enclosed with the proposal. The rent agreement is valid upto March 2012. The audited statement of accounts shows expenditure on Dementia Care Centre and Multi Facility Centre for women widows, but this should thoroughly checked by the representative of Finance Dept. In the annual report general paragraph on ageing is given. Not recommended.
21. Vishwa Jeevan Seva Sangha
Multi facility Care Centres for destitute older widow women, Khurda
Beneficiaries are below the age of sixty years. Not recommended.
22. Society for Education, Environmental Protection and Rural Area Development
Multi facility Care Centres for destitute older widow women, Koraput
The project is running since 2009. 36 beneficiaries were found at the time of Inspection. The premises seems to have one toilet for 50 beneficiaries. The audit statement shows consolidated expenditure on welfare of Older Persons. A general paragraph is mentioned about Old Age and problems in the Annual Report. Not recommended.
23. Neelanchal Seva Pratisthan
Multi facility Care Centres for destitute older widow women, Puri
The Inspection Report of District Social Welfare Officer of the project is not available Not recommended.
24. Jay Kishan Youth Club Multi facility Care Centres for destitute older widow women, Puri
Date of entry of all beneficiaries into the centre is on 1.4.2008. Staff engaged is not as per the Scheme. Audited Accounts do not show expenditure on the project. Not recommended.
25. Association for Voluntary Action
Multi facility Care Centres for destitute older widow women, Puri
Date of commencement of the project is not given in the Application whereas as per the Inspection Report the date of commencement is 1.6.2008. However, Audited Accounts do not show expenditure on the project. Not recommended.
26. Rural Association for Development of Harizan & Adivasi
Multi facility Care Centres for destitute older widow women, Subranpur
No activity in Memorandum of Association. Not recommended.
27. Juba Jyoti Jubak Sangha
Multi facility Care Centres for destitute older widow women, Subranpur
The rent agreement is there, but location/ centre is not given. 50 beneficiaries were found at the time of inspection. Staff list is given. Not recommended.
28. Women Organisation for Social Welfare
Multi facility Care Centres for destitute older widow women, Keonjhar
It is a prospective project. Not recommended.
Annexure-XIX PUDDUCHERRY S.No. Name of the
Organisastion Name of the project and location.
Remarks
1. Congregation of the Sisters of the St. Joseph of Cluny- St. Joseph convent - Karaikal
OAH, St. Joseph convent - Karaikal
Aims and objectives of the organization mentioned in the Memorandum of Association do not include welfare activities for senior citizens. Audited Accounts and Annual Reports do not reflect activities for welfare senior citizens. Not recommended.
Annexure-XX RAJASTHAN S.No Name of the
Organisation. Name of Project and location.
Remarks.
1. Maru Kshetriya Vikas Avam Samajik Sansthan. Gali No.3 Dhobi Talai,Bikaner.(Raj.)
Old Age Home, Dist. Bikaner (Raj.)
This is a prospective proposal. Audited Accounts and Annual Reports do not indicate details activities undertaken by the orgnisation for the welfare of senior citizens. Not recommended.
2. Tagore Soudh Evam Vikas Sanstha .10-A Tal Katora. Jaipur.(Raj.)
Old Age Home, Jhalwar (Raj.)
This is a prospective proposal. Audited Accounts and Annual Reports do not indicate details activities undertaken by the orgnisation for the welfare of senior citizens. Not recommended.
3 . Tagore Soudh Evam Vikas Sanstha .10-A Tal Katora. Jaipur.(Raj.)
DCC, Dausa
This is a prospective proposal. Audited Accounts for 2011-12 has not been submitted with the proposal. Not recommended.
4. Maru Kshetriya Vikas Avam Samajik Sansthan. Gali No.3 Dhobi Talai,Bikaner.(Raj.)
MMU, Churu
This is a prospective proposal. Audited Accounts and Annual Reports do not indicate details activities undertaken by the orgnisation for the welfare of senior citizens. Not recommended.
5. Gramin Uthan Manav Sansthan Bikaner (Raj).
Old Age Home, Dist. Bikaner (Raj.)
This is a prospective proposal. Audited Accounts and Annual Reports do not indicate details activities undertaken by the orgnisation for the welfare of senior citizens. Not recommended.
6. Aoes Old Age Home, Baran(Raj.)
Audited Accounts do not give details of expenditure on running of old age home. Not recommended.
7. Aoes Sansthan. Baran (Raj.)
DCC, Baran
This is a prospective proposal. Audited Accounts and Annual Reports do not indicate details activities undertaken by the orgnisation for the welfare of senior citizens. Not recommended.
8. Nehru Navyuvak Mandal The Shiv, Dist.Barmer.(Raj.)
Old Age Home, Barmer
This is a prospective proposal. Inspection Report is not in prescribed proforma. Audited Accounts and Annual Reports do not indicate details activities undertaken by the orgnisation for the welfare of senior citizens. Not recommended.
9. Radha Swamy Mahila Mandal Society .Pratap Nagar,Jaipur
Old Age Home, Churu
Annual Report does not give details Old Age Activities in the Year 2009, 2010 and 2011. Not recommended.
10. Radha Swamy Mahila Mandal Society .Pratap Nagar,Jaipur
Old Age Home, Karauli
Annual Report does not give details Old Age Activities in the Year 2009, 2010 and 2011. Not recommended.
11. Radha Swamy Mahila Mandal Society .Pratap Nagar,Jaipur
Helpline, Churu
It is a prospective project. The organization does not have a dedicated helpline number and a professionally qualified counsellor and it has no experience for running such a facility. Not recommended.
12. Rajasthan Mahila Evam Shishu Kalyankari Samiti 38-Civil lones Kota.
Old Age Home, Kota. Rajasthan
This is a prospective proposal. Audited Accounts do not indicate details activities undertaken by the orgnisation for the welfare of senior citizens. Annual Report for 2010-11 has not been submitted with the proposal. Not recommended.
13. Balapir Manav Sansthan Vikas Samiti. Nagaur. Raj.
Old Age Home, Pali
It is a prospective project. Discrepancies have been found in the Annual report and Audited Statement of Accounts. Not recommended.
14. Rural Environment Awareness Training Institute (REATI) Dausa. Raj.
DCC, Dausa
This is a prospective proposal. Audited Accounts and Annual Reports do not indicate details activities undertaken by the orgnisation for the welfare of senior citizens. Not recommended.
15. Adarsh Dhrone Vidya Mandir Sanstha (Dausa) Raj.
Old Age Home, Dausa.
Audited Accounts do not reflect expenditure on activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
16. Society for all Rornd Development Korputali Jaipur (Raj.)
Old Age Home, Churu
This is a prospective proposal. Rent of the building not mentioned in the Inspection Report. Not recommended.
17. Sambal Samiti C.-96,Anand Vihar, Jagatpura Jaipur (Raj.)
Old Age Home, Jaipur. (Raj.)
Discrepancies in the Application form. Not recommended.
18 Shubham Kalyan Sansthan.12,Khhdi Colony ,Havwara Road Jaipur-6
Old Age Home, Jaipur
Documents are incomplete. Audited statement of account needs to be checked by the Finance Dept. Not recommended.
19. Pawan Mangal Seva Sansthan Trust.VPO-Kadamb Doongri, Sarna Doonger .Jaipur (Raj.)
Old Age Home, Jaipur
This is a prospective proposal. Audited Accounts and Annual Reports do not indicate details activities undertaken by the orgnisation for the welfare of senior citizens. Not recommended.
20. Deepshikha Mahila Bal Utthan Samiti , c/o Kiran Nursing Home, Hatwara Road , Shanti Nagar, Jaipu-6 (Raj.)
DCC , with Dementia, Jaipur.
Earlier recommended by SC in its meeting held 17.11.2008. Not recommended.
21. Ideal Society for Heritage and Trourism
Old Age Home, Jaipur.
This is a prospective proposal. Audited Accounts and Annual Reports do not indicate
. C-11, Gandhi Nagar Mod Main Tonk road, Jaipur.(Raj.)
details activities undertaken by the orgnisation for the welfare of senior citizens. Not recommended.
22. Rajasthan Navchetana, 2/379,Housing Board Colony, Nagaur. (Raj.)
Old Age Home, Nagaur. (Raj.)
This is a prospective proposal. Audited Accounts do not indicate details activities undertaken by the orgnisation for the welfare of senior citizens. Not recommended.
23. Sarswati Bal Vidhya Mandir Samiti Khabdiya na Dadawadi keplche Nagar .(Raj.)
MFCC, Nagaur .(Raj.)
Annual Reports do not adequately indicate activities under taken. Not recommended.
24. Sai Baba Sansthan 30/112 ,Sector-3, Pratap Nagar. Jaipur. (Raj.)
Helpline, Nagaur. . (Raj.)
There are a number of discrepancies in the project proposal. The name of the organization mentioned in the application is different from the name given in the Annual Report. Not recommended.
25. Sahyog Samajik Sansthan ,30/114, Sectier-3,Partap Nagar . Jaipur.(Raj.)
Old Age Home, Tonk (Raj.)
This is a prospective proposal. Audited Accounts and Annual Reports do not indicate details activities undertaken by the orgnisation for the welfare of senior citizens. Not recommended.
26 Sahyog Samajik Sansthan ,30/114, Sectier-3,Partap Nagar . Jaipur.(Raj.)
Helpline, Tonk This is a prospective proposal. Audited Accounts and Annual Reports do not indicate details activities undertaken by the orgnisation for the welfare of senior citizens. Not recommended.
27 Maa Sita Devi Shikshan Sanstha, Dist. Churu, (Raj.)
Old Age Home, Dist. Churu, (Raj.)
This is a prospective proposal. Inspection Report is not in prescribed proforma. Audited Accounts do not indicate details activities undertaken by the orgnisation for the welfare of senior citizens. Not recommended.
28 Karmanya.Sanstha Pratap Chowki. (Raj.)
Old Age Home, Baran. (Raj.)
This is a prospective proposal. Inspection Report is not in prescribed proforma. Audited Accounts and Annual Reports do not indicate details activities undertaken by the orgnisation for the welfare of senior citizens. Not recommended.
29 All India Sarswati Educational Welfare Society.Maharaja Chowk, Near Bus Stand Rahgarh,. Dist. Churu (Raj.)
Helpline & Counseling Centre.
It is a prospective project for helpline. The organization does not have dedicated telephone line for the purpose. The audited statement of accounts does not show expenditure on helpline services in the year 2010-11. Not recommended.
30 Jan Kalyan Evam Paryavaran Sudhar
DCC, Jaipur, (Raj.)
This is a prospective proposal. Inspection Report is not in prescribed proforma. Audited
Samiti Jaipur, (Raj.) Accounts and Annual Reports do not indicate details activities undertaken by the orgnisation for the welfare of senior citizens. Not recommended.
31 Labour and Entrpreneurship Development Institute, Kisan Marg,Tonk Road, Jaipur, (Raj)
Old Age Home, Phagi (Raj)
It is a prospective project for Old Age home. The rent agreement of the term expires on 15.05.2011. The organization does not have any experience for running an Old Age home. The annual report and audited statement of accounts for the year 2010-11 does give general description, but not gives details on Old Age Home. Not recommended.
32 Radha Swami Mahila Mandal Society,Dist. Karauli (Raj.)
MFCC, Dist. Karauli (Raj.)
This is a prospective proposal. Inspection Report is not in prescribed proforma. Audited Accounts and Annual Reports do not indicate details activities undertaken by the orgnisation for the welfare of senior citizens. Not recommended.
33 Sai Baba Sansthan Pratap Nagar, Jaipur
Old Age Home, Rajsamand
This is a prospective proposal. Inspection Report is not in prescribed proforma. Audited Accounts and Annual Reports do not indicate details activities undertaken by the orgnisation for the welfare of senior citizens. Not recommended.
34 Sai Baba Sansthan Pratap Nagar, Jaipur
Helpline, Rajsamand
This is a prospective proposal. Inspection Report is not in prescribed proforma. Audited Accounts and Annual Reports do not indicate details activities undertaken by the orgnisation for the welfare of senior citizens. Not recommended.
35 Sahyog Samajik Sansthan, Pratap Nagar, (Raj)
Helpline, Rajsamand
This is a prospective proposal. Inspection Report is not in prescribed proforma. Audited Accounts and Annual Reports do not indicate details activities undertaken by the orgnisation for the welfare of senior citizens. Not recommended.
36 Mahila Smgra Uthan Samiti, Bikaner, (Raj.)
Old Age Home, Bikaner, (Raj)
This is a prospective proposal. Inspection Report is not in prescribed proforma. Audited Accounts and Annual Reports do not indicate details activities undertaken by the orgnisation for the welfare of senior citizens. Audit Report,2010-11 not furnished. Not recommended.
37 Arya Yuva Kendra, H,N. 103. Khera Khurd Dehli, Branch: Babr Magra, Jaisalmer (Raj.)
Old Age Home, Jaisalmer (Raj.)
It is a prospective project from Delhi based organization for running Old Age Home in Jaisalmer. The Activities mentioned in the Annual report is centred in Delhi only and it is not clear if they are working in Rajasthan. Not recommended.
38 Rajasthan Anusuchit Jari Mahila Aivam Shishu Vikas Samiti Chhawani, Kota (Raj)
DCC, Chhawani, Kota (Raj)
It is a prospective project for day Care Centre. Dimension of the rented building is not clearly given. Statement of the accounts should be checked in detail by the representative of Finance Dept. Not recommended.
39 Rajasthan Anusuchit Jari Mahila Aivam Shishu Vikas Samiti Chhawani, Kota (Raj)
MMU, Chhawani, Kota (Raj)
This is a prospective proposal. Inspection Report is not in prescribed proforma. Audited Accounts and Annual Reports do not indicate details activities undertaken by the orgnisation for the welfare of senior citizens. Not recommended.
40 Mahila Grameen Vikas Evam Takniki Prashiklhan Sansthan, Dungarpur, (Raj.)
MFCC, Dungarpur, (Raj
The statement of account is given only for one year. It does not have the list of employees. Dimension of the premises are not available. It is not clearly specified if the facility is exclusively for older persons. Not recommended.
41 Mahila Grameen Vikas Evam Takniki Prashiklhan Sansthan, Dungarpur, (Raj.)
Helpline, Dungarpur, (Raj
This is a prospective project for running helpline and counseling Centre. The organization has experience of running residential facilities for women. The organization limited experience for running day care centre for older persons in 2009-10 though does not reflect in the income expenditure statement.
Not recommended. 42 Sahyog Samajik
Sansthan, Pratap Nagar, (Raj)
MFCC, Tonk
This is a prospective proposal. Inspection Report is not in prescribed proforma. Audited Accounts and Annual Reports do not indicate details activities undertaken by the orgnisation for the welfare of senior citizens. Not recommended.
43 Radha Swami Mahila Mandal Society, Dist. Karauli (Raj.)
Helpline, Jaipur (Raj.)
It is a prospective project for running helpline services in Jaipur. The organization has experience of running helpline for women under Swadhar Scheme. However, the Application does not mention about the dedicated helpline facility for running the project. The Audited statement of account gives consolidated expenditure on helpline for older persons but does not give details. The rent agreement should also be checked as it is not on standard stamp Paper.
Not recommended. 44 Radha Swami Mahila
Mandal Society, Dist. Karauli (Raj.)
MFCC, Jaipur (Raj.)
This is a prospective proposal. Inspection Report is not in prescribed proforma. Audited Accounts and Annual Reports do not indicate details activities undertaken by the orgnisation for the welfare of senior citizens.
Not recommended. 45 Radha Swami Mahila
Mandal Society, Dist. Karauli (Raj.)
Old Age Home, Jaipur (Raj.)
It is a prospective project for running Old Age Home in Jaipur. The Audited Statement gives consolidated expenditure on Old Age Home. List of staff of Old Age Home is not enclosed. Not recommended.
46 Sai Baba Sansthan, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur
Old Age Home, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur
This is a prospective proposal. Inspection Report is not in prescribed proforma. Audited Accounts and Annual Reports do not indicate details activities undertaken by the orgnisation for the welfare of senior citizens. Not recommended.
47 Sai Baba Sansthan Pratap Nagar, Jaipur
Helpline, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur
This is a prospective proposal. Inspection Report is not in prescribed proforma. Audited Accounts and Annual Reports do not indicate details activities undertaken by the orgnisation for the welfare of senior citizens. Not recommended.
48 Sahyog Samajik Sansthan, Pratap Nagar, (Raj)
Old Age Home, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur
This is a prospective proposal. Inspection Report is not in prescribed proforma. Audited Accounts and Annual Reports do not indicate details activities undertaken by the orgnisation for the welfare of senior citizens. Not recommended.
49 Sahyog Samajik Sansthan, Pratap Nagar, (Raj)
Helpline, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur
This is a prospective proposal. Inspection Report is not in prescribed proforma. Audited Accounts and Annual Reports do not indicate details activities undertaken by the orgnisation for the welfare of senior citizens. Not recommended.
50 Varishtha Jankalyan Parishad, A-286, Vaishali Nagar,Jaipur (Raj.)
Old Age Home, Jaipur (Raj.)
This is a prospective proposal. Inspection Report is not in prescribed proforma. Audited Accounts and Annual Reports do not indicate details activities undertaken by the orgnisation for the welfare of senior citizens. Not recommended.
51 Kendriya Vidhya Bhawan Shiksha Samiti, Kota
OAH, Kota No. of beneficiaries present at the time of I.R. overwriting. In inspection report signature is not indicating with the stamp. Application form does not shown with the office stamp. In the Inspection report column no 8 to 10 area‐wise rooms are not mentioned. Staff list, No of beneficiaries are not in prescribed proforma. Building map is not available Not recommended.
52. Ravinder Bal Bharti Sansthan, Keshav
OAH, Jaipur In the Inspection report does not shows beneficiare is present at the time of IR.
Nagar Civil Lines, Jaipur
column no.11 & 18 area‐wise rooms are not mentioned. List of beneficiaries are not available. Not recommended.
53. Matri Chayya Charitity Trust
OAH, Sikar List of beneficiaries & Managing committee are not in prescribed. Annual Reports have not been enclosed. Not recommended.
54 Gyan Jyoti Vidya Mandir Soceity,
DCC, Dausa No. of beneficiaries present does not shows at the time of I.R. List of staff & Managing committee are not available. Not recommended.
55. Nari Chetna Samiti OAH, Jaipur List of staff & Managing committee are not in prescribed proforma. List of beneficiaries does not show present in the IR. Column no 10 blank in I.R. Not recommended.
56. Swasthya Kalyan College of Physiotherapy< Jai Villa, Narain Singh Road,
OAH, Jaipur Inspection report is not available in the proposal List of beneficiareis is not in prescribed proforma. Not recommended.
57. Partibha Prasikshan Sansthan Tonk
Physiotherapy, Jaipur
List of beneficiaries & details of staff list are not in prescribed proforma. Not recommended.
58. Bikaner Medical Relief Soceity
OAH, MOA, Registration Certificate, Budget Estimate, Rent Agreement is not enclosed. Not recommended.
59. Welfare India Soceity, Madhu Mook Badhir Vidhyalaya
OAH, Kota Inspection report is not in prescribed performa. List of beneficiaries & details of staff list are not in prescribed proforma. Not recommended.
60. Lokashrya Karampura, Shiraji Marg,
DCC, Churu Details of staff employed is not prescribed proforma. Not recommended.
61 Development Aid Organisation Barmer
OAH, Badmer Application form and all other documents submitted without stamp Inspection report is not available with the proposal. Not recommended.
Annexure-XXI SIKKIM
S.No. Name of the Organisastion
Name of the project and location.
Remarks
1. Iswarambha Samity Sangh, Ranippol
Day Care Centre, Ranipool, East Sikkim
While proposal submitted by the organization is for Day Care Centre, State Government has sent recommendation for construction of old age home. Not recommended.
Annexure-XXII TAMIL NADU
S. No Name of the Organisation. Name of Project and location.
Remarks
1. Rural Education for Action and Development Agency (Read Agency) Dindigul (Tamil Nadu)
IPOP, Dindigul (T.N.)
This is a prospective proposal. The Annual Report lists in a general way the activities of the organization for benefit of older persons. The Physio-Therapy Clinic that the Agency is running has employed a doctor and an assistant with hands on experience. The rent agreement attached with the proposal expired on 31.3.2012. Not recommended.
2. Moulding Intervrity, Culture,Health, Prevemtion, Livelihood Trust. Puthupaliam, Kobiceattiapliam, Erode. (T.N.)
Respite Care Centre, Madurai (T.N.)
The rent Agreement of the premises is valid till 31st March, 2012. Audited State of Accounts is very general. It does not give details of the amount spent on the projects listed for the older persons. Not recommended.
3. Sabamathi Social Seva Sanagam, Ammapalayam Anuparpalayam (Po) Tirupur. (T.N.)
MMU, Tirupur (T.N.)
Original Inspection Report is not available. List of beneficiaries is not in prescribed proforma. Not recommended.
4. Bureau for Integrated Rural Develoment, Polambakkam, Dist. Kanchipuram (T.N.)
MMU, Dist.Kanchipuram (T.N.)
There are internal discrepancies in the Project Proposal. The application is for mobile medi-care unit. Part B of the application form lists 30 beneficiaries. The list of beneficiaries in the Annexure has 188 names. Not recommended.
5. Vidvelli Rural Development Society, Trichy.(T.N.)
DCC, Dist.Trochy. (T.N.)
The rent agreement is valid only up to 31.03.2012. Not recommended.
6. Duraisamy Generous Social Education Association, Vivarayanallur, Kancheepuram. (T.N.)
DCC, Dist.Kancheepuram.(T.N.)
All the documents are in order and this is a current project. Recommended.
7. Gramiyam Sangh, Lakshmi nayakkanpatti (po), Uthamapalyam taulk, Dist. Theni. (T.N.) .
DCC, Dist.Theni (T.N.)
The organization is running facilities for older persons and all the documents is in order. Recommended.
8 Sri Venkateswara Educatioonal Society, Kaduveli, Thillaisthanam Post, Dist.Thanjavur . (T.N.)
MFCC, Dist.Thanjavur . (T.N.)
All the documents are in order and this is a current project. Recommended.
9 Selvi Trust Dist. Sivagangai, (T.N.)
MFCC, Dist. Sivagangai, (T.N.)
The organization is running facilities for Older Persons and all the documents are in order. Recommended.
10 Sri Ramakrishan Old Home, Dist. Thanjavur. (T.N.)
OAH, Dist.Thanjavur . (T.N.)
All the documents are in order and this is a current project. Recommended.
11 Tamil Nadu Pengal Nala Sangam, Tiruchirapalli, (T.N.)
OAH, Tiruchirapalli, (T.N.)
All the documents are in order and this is a current project. Recommended.
12. Centre for Rural Education and Economic Development-Creed Chidambaram, Dist.Cuddalore (T.N.)
OAH, Dist.Cuddalore (T.N.)
All the documents are in order and this is a current project. Recommended.
13 Jayamatha Ecpnomical and Educational Trust.Thuvakkudi & Post, Trichy. (T.N.)
OAH, Thuvakkudi & Post, Trichy. (T.N.)
All the documents are in order and this is a current project. Recommended.
Annexure-XXIII TRIPURA
S. No. Name of the Organisastion Name of the project and location.
Remarks
1. Mahatma Gandhi OLD Age Home
OAH, Narsingarh The proposal is incomplete. Inspection Report, Memorandum of Association, Audited accounts, Annual report etc.have not been submitted. Not recommended.
2. Mahatma Gandhi OLD Age Home
Oder widowed women, Narsingarh
The proposal is incomplete. Inspection Report, Memorandum of Association, Audited accounts, Annual report etc. have not been submitted. Not recommended.
3 Mahatma Gandhi OLD Age Home
Physio therapy Clinic for older persons, Narsingarh
The proposal is incomplete. Inspection Report, Memorandum of Association, Audited accounts, Annual report etc.have not been submitted. Not recommended.
4 Mahatma Gandhi OLD Age Home
Awareness project of older persons, Narsingarh
The proposal is incomplete. Inspection Report, Memorandum of Association, Audited accounts, Annual report etc.have not been submitted. Not recommended.
5 Mahatma Gandhi OLD Age Home
Disability & Hearing aids for elderly persons, Narsingarh
The proposal is incomplete. Inspection Report, Memorandum of Association, Audited accounts, Annual report etc.have not been submitted. Not recommended.
6 Ashray, Gournag(Mahadeb Bari), Kailashahar, North tripura
OAH, Narsingarh Proposal submitted by the organization is for 2010-11 whereas recommendation of the State Government is for 2011-12. Not recommended.
Annexure-XXIV West Bengal S. No.
Name of the Organisation
Name of the project
Remarks
1 Dulal Smriti Samsad Old Age Home, Khajurdaha, Hooghly
Original Inspection Report is not available. Audited Accounts do not show expenditure on running of old age home. Not recommended.
2 Vishwa Bharati Seva Kendra
Regional Resource and Training Centre, Baruipur, South 24 Paragna,
The organisation does not have adequate experience in the field of ageing to undertake the activities of RRTC. Not recommended.
3 Garden Reach Slum Develoopment Project
Old Age Home, Garden Reach, Kolkata
Aims and objectives of the organisation as per the Memorandum of Association of the organisation do not include welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
4 Gangadharchak & Dewanchak Vivekanda Club
Old Age Home, Contai, Purba Medinipur, WB
Audited Accounts do not reflect expenditure incurred in undertaking welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
5 Gudiya Mission Old Age Home, Bagbazar, Kolkata
Audited Accounts do not reflect expenditure incurred in undertaking welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
6 Calcutta Medtropolitan Institute of Gerontoloy
RRTC, S.C. Banerjee Road, Kolkata
Recommended.
7 Vishwa Bharati Seva Kendra
Old Age Home, Baruipur, South 24 Paragna,
Audited Accounts do not reflect expenditure incurred in undertaking welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.
8 Manthan DCC Demntia, Bally, Howrah
Copy of the rent agreement has not been submitted with the proposal. Not recommended.
9 Hitaljore Kishoribala Databya Chikitsalaya
Widow Home, Paschim Medinipur
Application is not in prescribed proforma and Memorandum of Association is not legible. Not recommended.
10 Vishwa Bharati Seva Kendra
Widow Home, Baruipur, South 24 Paragna,
Audited Accounts do not reflect expenditure incurred in undertaking welfare activities for senior citizens. Not recommended.