Minutes of the 367th meeting of the ... Minutes of the 367th.pdfPage 1 of 64 367 th meeting of...

of 64

367thmeeting of SEAC-Gujarat, Dated 17.01.2018

Page 1 of 64

Minutes of the 367thmeeting of the StateLevelExpertAppraisalCommittee held on 17/01/2018 at Committee Room, GEER Foundation, Gandhinagar.

The 367thmeeting of the StateLevelExpertAppraisalCommittee (SEAC) was held on 17th January 2018 at Committee Room, GEER foundation, Gandhinagar. Following members attended the meeting:

1. Dr. Dinesh Misra, Chairman, SEAC

2. Shri S. C. Srivastav, Vice Chairman, SEAC

3. Dr. V. K. Jain, Member, SEAC.

4. Shri V. N. Patel, Member, SEAC

5. Shri K. C. Mistry, Secretary, SEAC

The agenda of TOR/Scopingcases, reconsideration, EC amendment and Appraisal was taken up. Total eightcases of TOR/Scoping,four cases of Appraisal,one case of EC amendment and two cases of reconsideration,were taken up. The applicants made presentations on the activities to be carried out along with other details furnished in the Form-1, PFR, EIA-EMP report and other reports.

1 SIA/GJ/IND2/21053/2017 M/s: Resinova Chemie Ltd., Plot No. Ch-25, GIDC Industrial Estate, Dahej, Ta. : Vagra, Dist.: Bharuch.

Screening and Scoping

Category of the Project: 5(f) Project Status: New

• This office has received an application vide their online proposal no. SIA/GJ/IND2/21053/2017 dated 23/11/2017 regarding grant of Terms of Reference [ToR] for preparation of EIA/EMP report.

• This is a Newofunit process manufacturing of synthetic organic chemicals as tabulated below:

Sr. No.

Name of the Products

CAS no. Quantity MT/Month

End-use of product

01 Polyamide 68410-23-1 2000 Curing agent for epoxy resin for Adhesive & coating application

02 Epoxy grades Not defined in chemical Abstracts service

1500 Adhesive & Coating applications

03 Hardener grades - do - 1000 Adhesive & Coating applications

04 PVA adhesive - do - 1000 Adhesive 05 Acrylic emulsions - do - 500 Adhesive, coating and

waterproofing applications 06 Hot melt adhesive - do - 2000 Adhesive

• The project falls under category B of project activity 5 (f) as per the schedule of the EIA

notification 2006.

• PP was called for presentation in SEAC meeting dated 17/01/2018.

• Salient feature of the project including Water, Air and Hazardous waste management:

Sr. no.

Particulars Details

A Total cost of Proposed Project (Rs. in Crores):

Approx. 100 crores (Proposed)

1. Capital cost of EMS (Environmental Management System ) : 1.5 Crores

of 64


Page 2 of 64

2. Recurring cost towards the environmental protection measure : 0.50 Crores per Annum

B Total Plot area ( sq. meter)

Approx. 68000 sq. mtrs. (proposed)

Green belt area,/Tree Plantation area ( sq. meter)

Approx. 22000 sq. mtrs. (33 % of plot area -proposed)

C Employment generation

1. Direct Existing : 0 Proposed : 180 Total : 180

2. Indirect Existing : 0 Proposed : 300 Total : 300

D Water

i

Source of Water Supply (GIDC, Bore well, Surface water etc...)

GIDC

Status of permission from the concern authority: will be obtained in due course.

ii Water consumption (KL/day)

Proposed (KL/day) (A) Domestic 12.5

(B) Gardening 10.0 (C) Industrial

Process 27.5

Washing 0.0 Boiler 40.0

Cooling 3.0 Others 12.0

Total 105.0

iii Waste water generation (KL/day)

- Category Proposed (KL/Day) Remarks

(A) Domestic 10.5 (B) Industrial

Process 4.5

Washing 0.0 Boiler 4.0

Cooling 2.5 Others 12.0

Total Industrial waste water

23.0

- iv Treatment facility with capacity

(ETP, CETP, MEE, STP etc). In-house primary ETP followed by MEE to achieve “Zero Liquid Discharge”.

v Mode of Disposal & Final meeting point

Domestic: in-house STP. Treated sewage will be re-used for gardening purpose Industrial: Zero Discharge. Condensate will be reused as cooling tower make-up water.

vi Reuse/Recycle details (KL/day) 19 vii Details of rain water harvesting Will be provided in REIA report

E Air

of 64


Page 3 of 64

i Flue gas emission details No. of Boilers/TFH/Furnaces/DG sets etc. with capacities viz. TPH, Kcal/hr, MT/hr, KVA etc.

- Sr. no.

Source of emission With Capacity e.g.

Boiler (8 TPH)

Stack Height (meter)

Name of the fuel

Quantity of Fuel MT/hr & MT/Day

APCM Type of emissions i.e. Air Pollutants

Emission Standards

1 2 TPH steam boiler 30

Natural

Gas

60000

SCM/Month

Not

Required

PM SO2 NOx

PM<150 mg/Nm3

SO2< 100 ppm NOx< 50 ppm

2 Thermic Fluid Heater(10 Lac Kcal capacity)

3 D.G. set no. 1 (1000 KVA)

12 HSD

3.0 KL/day

Acoustic enclosure 4 D.G. set no. 2

(1000 KVA) 12

- ii Process gas i.e. Type of pollutant gases (SO2, HCl, NH3, Cl2, NOxetc.)

-

Sr. no.

Source of emission

Stack/Vent Height (meter)

APCM Type of

emissions i.e. Air Pollutants

Emission Standards

1 Not applicable

-

V Fugitive emission details with its mitigation measures: Details of sources and mitigation measures of fugitive emissions will be covered in detail in REIA report.

F Hazardous waste (as per the Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules 2016.

i Sr. no.

Type/Name of Hazardous

waste

Source of generation

Category and Schedule as per

HW Rules.

Quantity (MT/Annum)

Disposal Method

1 a ETPsludge Effluent treatment

35.3 20 TSDF b MEE salt 72

2 Discarded

containers

Mfg. process

33.1

60 Sell to authorizedvendor / common decontamination

facility 3 WasteResidue Mfg.

Process 23.1 96 CHWI

4 Usedoil Mfg. Plant 5.1 1.2 KL Sell to registeredre- processor.

5 Spent resin DM Plant 35.2 12 TSDF Quantity of all the wastes including discarded containers must be in MT/Annum.

ii Membership details of CETP, TSDF, CHWIF, Common MEE etc.

Membership of TSDF and CHWIF will be obtained.

ii Details of Non-Hazardous waste & its disposal (MSW and others)

Bio-sludge from STP. It will be used as manure in garden.

G Solvent management (If any) I Details of Solvent recovery Will be covered in REIA report.

ii VOC emission sources and its mitigation measures Will be covered in REIA report.

Technical presentation was made by the project proponent.PP was asked to mention CAS number

before each product. Committee noted that water consumption is 105 KLPD and waste water

generation is 23 KLPD. In-house primary ETP followed by MEE is proposed by PP to achieve “Zero

Liquid Discharge”. Condensate from the MEE will be reused in cooling water make up. There is no

of 64


Page 4 of 64

process gas emission. During presentation, PP was asked to explore high CV containing hazardous

waste and to explore itsutilization for co-processing.

Considering the above project details and detailed discussion, the terms of reference (ToR) were

prescribed as below and as per the standard TOR for the Synthetic Organic Chemical projects

recommended by SEAC vide letter no. EIA-10-GEN-21/1480 dated 14/09/2017 and approved by

SEIAA in its 12th meeting dated 16/09/2017 for the EIA study to be done covering 10 Km radial

distance from the project boundary.

Also the TOR prescribed as above and as per the standard TOR approved by SEIAA and the model

ToRs available in the MoEFCC’s sector specific EIA Manual for ‘Synthetic Organic Chemical

Industry’ shall be considered as generic TORs for preparation of the EIA report in addition to all the

relevant information as per the generic structure of EIA given in Appendix III in the EIA Notification,

2006.

Following specific TOR were also prescribed

1. Explore utilization of high Calorific value containing hazardous waste for co-processing in

cement plant.

2. Explore reutilization of MEE salt in process.

The project proponent shall have to apply for Environmental clearance through online portal

http://environmentclearance.nic.in/ along with final EIA report.

2 SIA/GJ/IND2/20742/2017 M/s. Parson Industries A2/171, GIDC, Nandesari, Dist.: Vadodara


Category of the Project: 5(f) Project Status: Expansion

• This office has received an application vide their online proposal no. SIA/GJ/IND2/20742/2017 dated 23/11/2017regarding grant of Terms of Reference [ToR] for preparation of EIA/EMP report.

• This is an Expansion of unit process manufacturing of synthetic organic chemicals as tabulated below:

Sr. No.

Name of products CAS No. Existing (MT/M)

Proposed Change (MT/M)

Total (MT/M)

End Use

1 Inorganic Fine Chemicals 435 -- 435 Fine

Chemicals

2 Calcium Saccharate / Potassium Saccharate

5793-89-5

10

147 Fine

Chemicals

3 Calcium Glucoheptonate / Sodium Glucoheptonate

29039-00-7

10

4 Glucose penta acetate 604-68-2 5

5 Calcium Lactobionate 110638-68-1 10

6 Iodoform 75-47-8 2

7 Sodium Diacetate 126-96-5 30

8 Choline Chloride (Purification)

67-48-1

50

9 Glycine (Purification) 56-40-6 30

Total 435 147

of 64


Page 5 of 64


notification 2006.


• Salient feature of the project including Water, Air and Hazardous waste management: Sr. no.

Particulars Details

A Total cost of Proposed Project (Rs. in Crores): Existing: Rs. 7 Crores

Proposed: Rs 3 Crores Total: Rs. 10 Crores

(1) Capital cost for EMS (Environmental Management System: Rs. 0.48 Crores (2) Recurring cost towards the environmental protection measures: Rs. 1.2 Crores per

Annum. B Total Plot area ( sq. meter) Existing: 1850

Proposed: Nil Total: 1850

Green belt area,/T ree Plantation area ( sq. meter) Existing: 200 Proposed: 100 Total: 300

C Employment generation 1. Direct Existing: 20

Proposed: 10 Total: 30

2. Indirect Existing: 10 Proposed: 10 Total:20

D Water

i Source of Water Supply (GIDC, Bore well, Surface water etc...)

GIDC Water Supply Scheme

Status of permission from the concern authority. Permission has been obtained. Ii Water consumption (KL/day) : 149 KL/day

Existing Proposed Additional

Total after Expansion

Remarks

KL/day KL/day KL/day

(A) Domestic 2.5 7.5 10.0 (B) Gardening 0.5 1.5 2.0 (C) Industrial Process 30.7 24.3 55.0 Washing 15.2 4.8 20.0 Boiler 6.0 4.0 10.0 Cooling 6.5 6.5 13.0 Others -- -- --

Total (A+B+C) 60 110

iii Waste water Generation (KL/day)

Category Existing KL/Day

Proposed (Additional)

KL/day


KL/day

Remarks

(A) Domestic 2.0 6.0 8.0

(B) Industrial Process 0.6 40.4 41.0 Washing 15.2 4.8 20.0

of 64


Page 6 of 64

Boiler 0.2 2.8 3.0 Cooling 0 2.0 2.0 Others -- -- Total Industrial waste water 18.0 74.0

Iv Treatment facility with capacity (ETP, CETP, MEE, STP etc).

The Waste water is treated in in-house ETP. The treatment scheme is based on the treatment process

provided by the CETP authorities of NIA. The treatment is based on hydrodynamic cavitation based

treatment. The Capacity of the treatment plant is to treat 20 KL/day.

The treatment units comprise of

1) Collection cum Reaction tank – 40 x 2 m3

2) Lime doser – 5 m3

3) Filter Press – 48” x 48” x 50 plates

4) Treated water collection tank – 80 m3

V Mode of Disposal & Final Meeting Point Domestic : Domestic Waste water is disposed off in

soak pit

Industrial : The waste water after treatment in inhouse

ETP is sent to the CETP of NIA as per the CETP Norms

vi Reuse / Recycle Details (KL/day) Not applicable

vii Details of Rain water harvesting Not allowed in GIDC as per the verbal instructions of

GPCB

E Air (Existing & Proposed)

Flue Gas emission details :No. of

boilers/TFH/Furnaces/DG Set etc with

capacities viz TPH, Kcal/hr, KVA etc.

i)

SR. no.

Source of emission

With Capacity

e.g. Boiler (8 TPH)


Name of the fuel


Type of emissions

i.e. Air Pollutants

APCM Emission Standards

1

Existing Boiler (0.6

MT/hr)

31 mts Natural gas

1750 scm/day

NOx, PM Not Required because of Clean

Fuel

NOx = 50 ppm PM = 150 mg/Nm3

2 Existing Boiler (0.6 MT/hr) Same boiler will be used

31 mts Natural gas

2500 scm/day

NOx, PM Not Required because of Clean

Fuel

NOx = 50 ppm PM = 150 mg/Nm3

3 DG SET (250 KVA)

5 mts HSD 45 Lts/hr SO2, NOx, PM

SO2 = 100 ppm NOx = 50 ppm

PM = 150 mg/Nm3

ii) Process gas i.e. Type of pollutant gases (SO2i HCl, NH3J Cl2, NOx etc.) [Existing & Proposed]

Existing Scrubber Proposed Scrubber

Scrubber 1 Scrubber 2 Scrubber 3 Scrubber 4

Stack attached to Existing reactor

Existing reactor

Proposed Reactor

Proposed Reactor

Stack diameter 100 mm 100 mm 100 mm 100 mm

Stack height 10 m 10 m 10 m 10 m

of 64


Page 7 of 64

Gases scrubbed Acidic fumes

Acidic fumes Acidic fumes Acidic fumes

Scrubbing medium Caustic Solution

Caustic Solution

Caustic Solution

Caustic Solution

Fate of exhausted medium

Sent to ETP Sent to ETP Sent to ETP Sent to ETP

iii) Fugitive emission details with its mitigation measures. [Existing and Proposed]

No Solvents are used in the process. However detailed Fugitive emissions monitoring report will be provided in the EIA Report

F Hazardous Waste (as per the Hazardous and other wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules 2016

I

Sr. No.

Type of waste Existing Quantity

Proposed Quantity

Category

Disposal method

1 ETP Sludge 28.8 MT/YR

100 MT/YR

35.3 Collection, storage. Transportation, Disposal at TSDF, NECL, Nandesari

2 Discarded containers

30 MT/YR 50 MT/YR 33.3 Collection, storage, Transportation and disposal by selling to authorized recyclers

3 Process Sludge, filter residue, siliceous, silica and fibrous particles

1.2 MT/YR 5 MT/YR 34.3 Collection, storage. Transportation, Disposal at TSDF, NECL, Nandesari

4 Used Oil 0.12 MT/YR

0.5 MT/YR

5.1 Collection, Storage, Transportation and disposal by selling to reg. refiners or will be sent to CHWI for incineration at NECL, Nandesari

5 Flyash from boiler

222 MT/Yr --- — Collection, storage, Transportation and disposal by selling to brick manufacturers

Ii Membership details of CETP, TSDF, CHWIF, Common MEE etc.

CETP: NIA TSDF: NECL

iii Details of Non-hazardous waste & its disposal (MSW and others)

Domestic Waste generated by the unit is picked up daily by truck organized by NIA and sent to common domestic waste disposal site.

G Solvent management (if any) Solvent is used in the process I Details of Solvent Recovery (as per respective

TOR) Not Applicable

ii VOC emissions sources and its mitigation measures

Details of VOC monitoring will be submitted in EIA report

Technical presentation was made by the project proponent. Compliance of existing permission from

the GPCB was discussed. PP mentioned that there is no public complaint against their unit neither

any public litigation is pending before any court of law and also there is no pending corrective

measures proposed by GPCB. During presentation, it is noted that expansion of 147 MTPM of

product is proposed. Additional water requirement is 48.60 KLPD to be sourced from GIDC.The

Waste water is proposed to be treated in ETP. The treatment scheme is based on the treatment

process provided by the CETP authorities of NIA. The treatment is hydrodynamic cavitation and

capacity of the treatment plant is to treat 20 KL/day.The waste water of 66 KLPD after treatment is

of 64


Page 8 of 64

proposed to send to the CETP of NIA complying CETP inlet Norms.PP was asked to prepare LDAR

for curbing VOC release and to mention bleed liquor from the scrubbers as hazardous waste with

quantity and type of treatment/disposal under the Hazardous waste Rules 2016.

Considering the above project details, after detailed discussion, the terms of reference (ToR) were


recommended by SEAC vide letter no. EIA-10-GEN-21/1480 dated 14/09/2017 and approved by

SEIAA in its 12th meeting dated 16/09/2017 for the EIA study to be done covering 10 Km radial

distance from the project boundary.

1. Adequacy of proposed area with respect to plant machineries , EMS, green belt , safety

aspect, raw material & product storage considering worst case scenario. Submit proper lay

out plan clearly demarcating all activities with scale.

2. To prepare Leak Detection and Re4pairing Programme (LDAR) for curbing VOC release in

ambient air with detailed chemical characteristics of solvents.

3. To update hazardous waste generation profile as per the Hazardous and Other Waste

(Management and Tran boundary Movements) Rules 2016.

The TOR prescribed as above and as per the standard TOR approved by SEIAA and the model

ToRs available in the MoEFCC’s sector specific EIA Manual for ‘Synthetic Organic Chemical

Industry’ shall be considered as generic TORs for preparation of the EIA report in addition to all the

relevant information as per the generic structure of EIA given in Appendix III in the EIA Notification,

2006.

The projectproponent shall have to apply for Environmental clearance through online portal


3 SIA/GJ/MIS/21120/2017 M/s. Distromed Bio Clean Pvt. Ltd. Plot No: 272, 273, 274, 169 & 170, Kuvadwa G.I.D.C, Village: Kuvadwa, Taluka: Rajkot, Dist: Rajkot


Category of the Project: 7(da) Project Status: Expansion

• This office has received an application vide their online proposal no. SIA/GJ/MIS/21120/2017 dated 23/11/2017 regarding grant of Terms of Reference [ToR] for preparation of EIA/EMP report.

• This is anExpansion of unit process manufacturing of Common infrastructure facility as tabulated below:

Sr. No.

Facility Capacity

Remarks Existing Proposed

Total After Expansion

1. Incinerator 100

kg/hr* 200 kg/hr

200 kg/hr 100 kg/hr

200 kg/hr (E) 200 kg/hr (P) 100 kg/hr (P)

*Existing 100 kg/hr Incinerator will be replaced by proposed 200 kg/hr Incinerator.

2. Autoclave/Disinfection

50 kg/hr 150 kg/hr 200 kg/hr -

3. Shredder 50 kg/hr 50 kg/hr

Nil 50 kg/hr 50 kg/hr

-

of 64


Page 9 of 64

• The project falls under category B of project activity 7(da) as per the schedule of the EIA

notification 2006.



Sr. no.

Particulars Details

A Total cost of Proposed Project (Rs.in Crore) Existing: 0.98 Proposed: 1.25 Total: 2.23

(1) Capital cost for EMS (Environmental Management System): 15 Lacs (2) Recurringcost towards the environmental protection measures: 2.5Lacs per Annum

B Total Plot area ( sq. meter)

Existing: 3465.23 Proposed:2272.50 Total: 5737.73

Green belt area,/Tree Plantation area ( sq. meter)

Existing: 1144 Proposed: 750 Total: 1894

C Employment generation 1. Direct Existing: 18

Proposed: 14 Total: 32

2. Indirect Existing: 15 Proposed: 15 Total:30

D Water

i


Ground water

Status of permission from the concern authority: Permission from CGWA for ground water extraction is already in process


Category Existing KL/day


KL/day


KL/day Remarks

(D) Domestic 2.0 0.0 2.0 Existing water requirement is sufficient for additional manpower

(E) Gardening 0.0 9.0 9.0

(F) Industrial 5.5 13.5 19.0

Process 0.5 0.5 1.0

Washing 1.5 0.5 2.0

Scrubbing 3.5 12.5 16.0 Total (A+B+C) 7.5 22.5 30.0




KL/day


KL/day Remarks

(C) Domestic 1.2 0.0 1.2

(D) Industrial

Process 0 0 0

Washing 1.5 0.5 2.0

Scrubbing 2.0 12.0 14.0 Total Industrial waste water 4.7 12.5 17.2

iv Treatment facility with capacity (ETP, CETP, MEE, STP etc).

ETP Existing: 15 KL Proposed: 15 KL


Domestic: to Soak pit/septic tank system

Industrial:Reused after treated in ETP (ZLD

of 64


Page 10 of 64

plant)

vi Reuse/Recycle details (KL/day) 15.0 vii Details of rain water harvesting 1 – 1.2 KLD in rainy season E Air (Existing and Proposed)


Sr. No.

Source of emission

With Capacity e.g. Boiler (8

TPH)


Name of the fuel


Type of emissions

i.e. Air Pollutants

APCM NAAQS (National Ambient

Air Quality Standards)

Existing

1

DG Set (82.5 kVA x 1

Nos.) Stand by

10 Diesel 18 L/h PM SO2 NOx

Adequate Stack Height

SPM ≤ 150 mg/Nm3 SOX ≤ 100 ppm NOX ≤ 50 ppm

Proposed

-

ii Process gas i.e. Type of pollutant gases (SO2, HCl, NH3, Cl2, NOx etc.) (Existing and Proposed) Sr. No.

Source of emission

Stack/vent Height (meter)

APCM Emission standard

Existing

1 Incinerator* (100 kg/hr)

30 • Ventury scrubber • Droplet separator

SPM ≤ 50 mg/Nm3 NOx ≤ 400 mg/Nm3 HCl ≤ 50 mg/nm3

Total Dioxins and Furans ≤ 0.1 ng TEQ/Nm3

(at 11 % O2) Hg ≤ 0.05 mg/Nm3

2 Incinerator (200 kg/hr)

30 • Ventury scrubber • Droplet separator • Cyclone separator

Proposed


30 • Quencher • Ventury scrubber • Droplet separator

SPM ≤ 50 mg/Nm3 NOx ≤ 400 mg/Nm3 HCl ≤ 50 mg/nm3

Total Dioxins and Furans ≤ 0.1 ng TEQ/Nm3

(at 11 % O2) Hg ≤ 0.05 mg/Nm3


30 • Quencher • Ventury scrubber • Droplet separator

*Existing 100 kg/hr Incinerator will be replaced by proposed 200 kg/hr Incinerator v Fugitive emission details with its mitigation measures.

(Existing and Proposed)

Dust emission from project having a major role on fugitive emission. The fugitive emissions mainly occur due to handling and transportation of Bio Medical Waste and Incineration ash. Following measures are being followed to ensure compliance and further reductions wherever possible; the same will be continued after expansion.

• Water will be sprinkled on the road during transportation to reduce dust emission.

• Possibilities to construct cement concrete road will be evaluated.

• Incineration ash will be stored as per the guideline.

• Incineration ash will be transported to TSDF site in closed containers and also through covered vehicles.

• Proper ventilation in storage area is provided and all Bio Medical Waste are being stored as per the BMW rule, 2016 to prevent generation of odour.

• SOP’s for start-up, shut down, operation & maintenance are established & maintained in all relevant area of works.

• The coverage of greenbelt around the plant consisting of noise and air pollution capturing species also acts as natural barrier to stop carrying of dust along with the wind current.

of 64


Page 11 of 64

• Good housekeeping is maintained in the plant. F Hazardous waste (as per the Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and

Transboundary Movement) Rules 2016. (Existing and Proposed)

i

Sr. no.


waste


Category and

Schedule as per HW Rules.

Quantity (MT/Annum)

Disposal Method

Existing Proposed Total

1 Used oil Machineries 5.1 15

Lit/Y 18

Lit/Y 32

Lit/Y Burnt into Incinerator

2 Incinerator

Ash Process 37.2 120 180 300

Collection, Storage, Transportation and sent to nearest TSDF for final disposal. 3 ETP Sludge ETP 35.3 24 216 240

4

Disinfected materials

(Shredded plastic, glass

etc.)

Process - 144 706 850 Send to authorized recycler.

5 Encapsulated Waste sharps

Process - - 2.4* 2.4 Send to Recycler or TSDF for

final disposal *As sharps

Quantity of discarded containers must be in MT/Annum.


Unit has obtained required membership of TSDF site. The details are as under:

• Unit is a member of M/s. Ecocare Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., Surendranagar


Disinfected materials as shown in above table

G Spent Solvent (If any) - i Details of Solvent recovery (As per respective ToR) -

ii VOC emission sources and its mitigation measures -

Technical presentation was made by the project proponent. Committee noted that it is an existing

facility. PP informed that no action till date by GPCB is there regarding noncompliance of CCA. There is

no public litigation and any complaint against the unit. PP mentioned that at present 2083 members are

there. Committee asked PP to submit gap analysis as mentioned in CPCB guideline with consideration

of other existing/proposed common biomedical waste incineration facility in an area of 75 Km. PP is

also asked to explore mercury waste handling methodology and its final disposal. Committee

emphasized on complete management of BMW as per the BMW Rules and prevailing guidelines. After

detailed discussion, the following additional Terms of Reference were prescribed for the EIA study to be

done covering 10 Km radial distance from the project boundary.

1. A tabular chart with index for point-wise compliance of below mentioned TORs.

2. Executive summary of the project – giving a prima facie idea of the objectives of the proposal,

use of resources, justification, etc. In addition, it should provide a compilation of EIA report,

including EMP and post project monitoring plan in brief. Need for the proposed CBWTF shall be

justified in detail.

3. Justification for selecting the proposed unit size.

4. Gap analysis of biomedical waste being generated by the existing members, proposed

members with regard to existing common biomedical waste incineration facility in the region of

75 km including your CBMWF.

5. Consent to Establish from SPCB as per the revised Guidelines for Common Bio-medical Waste

of 64


Page 12 of 64

Treatment and Disposal Facilities published by CPCB vide dated 21/12/2016.

6. Land possession documents and NA permission for the proposed project site.

7. Submit a copy of the land use certificate from the competent authority.

8. Land requirement for the facility including its break up for various purposes, its availability and

optimization.

9. Details of proposed layout clearly demarcating peripheral open path for unobstructed movement

of fire tender as well as various activities such as security, weighbridge, laboratory facility,

temporary BMW storage area, vehicle parking area, and others such as admin building,

canteen, worker’s room, health centers, vehicle cleaning areas/ maintenance areas, greenbelt,

internal roads, etc.

10. Present land use pattern of the study area shall be given based on recent satellite imagery as

well as field investigation clearly indicating, residential area, industries, vegetation (agricultural

land, irrigated, un-irrigated, un-cultivable land-as per the revenue records, forest land- as per the

records) grazing and waste land.

11. Point wise compliance prevailing of guidelines published by MoEF&CC& CPCB for sitting and

designing of the proposed CBWTF.

12. Details of handling of mercury waste from the member units with quantity, its handling

methodology, transportation, storage, stabilization process and final disposal to TSDF. How it

will be ensured that the mercury will be segregated from the biomedical waste before it is

received from the HCUs. Action plan in this regard shall be incorporated in EIA report.

13. Compliance of Revised Guidelines for Common Bio-medical Waste Treatment and Disposal

Facilities published by CPCB vide dated 21/12/2016. Action plan for compliance of BMW Rules

through continuous vigilant monitoring of member HCUs, guidance & training programmes.

14. Ensure that design of Incinerator, Autoclave, Shredder and storage facilities shall be as per the

CPCB guidelines.

15. Compliance of odor control guideline published by CPCB.

16. Water requirement for the project and permission from the concern authority. Submit detailed

water balance diagram.

17. Undertaking stating that no bore well shall be dug within the premises (If project is located within

the Industrial estate).

18. Quality and quantity of waste water to be generated from the proposed project.

19. Action plan for ‘Zero’ discharge of effluent (ZLD) shall be included. Notarized undertaking for

assuring that underground drainage connection will not be taken in the unit and there shall be

no effluent discharge outside the plant premises.

20. Economical and technical viability of the effluent treatment system to achieve Zero Liquid

Discharge (ZLD).

21. Stream wise qualitative & quantitative analysis of each waste stream to be generated.

Characteristics of untreated and treated wastewater. A detailed effluent treat ability study vis-à-

vis the adequacy and efficacy of the treatment facilities proposed for the wastewater to be

generated. The characteristic on which treatability is based shall also be stated.

22. Details of the ETP units including its capacity, size of each unit, retention time and other

technical parameters.

23. Undertaking stating that a separate electric meter will be provided for the proposed ETP and

Incinerator & logbook for operation of ETP &incinerator will be maintained.

24. Plans formanagement, collection and disposal of waste streams tobe generated from spillage,

leakages, washing etc. Measures proposed for preventing effluent discharge during unforeseen

circumstances.

of 64


Page 13 of 64

25. One season Site-specific micro-meteorological data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly

wind speed and directionand rainfall should be incorporated.

26. Anticipated environmental impacts due to the proposed project/production may be evaluated for

significance and based on corresponding likely impacts VECs (Valued Environmental

Components) may be identified. Baseline studies may be conducted within the study area of 5

km for all the concerned/identified VECs and likely impacts will have to be assessed for their

magnitude in order to identify mitigation measures.

27. One complete season base line ambient air quality data (except monsoon) to be given along

with the dates of monitoring. The parameters to be covered shall be in accordance with the

revised National Ambient Air Quality Standards as well as project specific parameters. Locations

of the monitoring stations should be so decided so as to take into consideration the pre-

dominant downwind direction, population zone and sensitive receptors. There should be at least

one monitoring station in the upwind direction. There should be at least one monitoring station

in the pre dominant downwind direction at a location where maximum ground level

concentration is likely to occur.

28. Modelling indicating the likely impact on ambient air quality due to proposed activities. The

details of model used and input parameters used for modelling should be provided. The air

quality contours may be shown on location map clearly indicating the location of sensitive

receptors, if any, and the habitation. The wind rose showing pre-dominant wind direction should

also be indicated on the map. Impact due to vehicular movement shall also be included into the

prediction using suitable model. Results of Air dispersion modelling should be superimposed on

satellite image / geographical area map.

29. Base linestatus of the noise environment, impact of noise on present environment dueto the

project and proposed measures for noise reduction including engineering controls.

30. Specific details of (i) Process gas emission from each unit process with its quantification, (ii) Air

pollution Control Measures proposed for process gas emission, (iii) Adequacy of the air pollution

control measures for process gas emission, measures to achieve the GPCB norms (iv) Details

of the utilities required (v) Type and quantity of fuel to be used for each utility (vi) Flue gas

emission rate from each utility (vii) Air Pollution Control Measures proposed to each of the utility

along with its adequacy (viii) List the sources of fugitive emission along with its quantification

and proposed measures to control it.

31. Technical details of APCM along with its adequacy, details of its operational controls with DCS,

system for online monitoring of the pollutants from the stack etc. Details of provisions to be kept

in APCM to ensure that in any case the air emission does not cross the GPCB norms,

preventive maintenance, failure / tripping control system, guaranteefrom the APCM supplier,

alternative arrangements in case of the failure of the APCM etc.

32. Provision of CEMS (Continuous Emission Monitoring system).

33. Occupationalhealth impacts on the workers and mitigation measures proposedto avoid the

human health hazards along with the personalprotectiveequipment to be provided to the

workers. Plan for pre-employment and periodicalmedical checkup of the workers.

34. Details of the proposed overall safety and health protection measures during the project design,

construction and operation phases.

35. Details on surface/storm water management.

36. Risk assessment including prediction of the worst-case scenario and maximum credible

accident scenario. The worst-case scenario should take into account the maximum inventory of

storage at site at any point in time. The risk contours should be plotted on the plant layout map

clearly showing which of the activities would be affected in case of an accident taking place.

Measures to guard against fire hazards including details of firedetection and controlsystem and

of 64


Page 14 of 64

fire controlplan showing hydrantpipeline network, provision of DG Sets, fire pumps, jockey

pump, toxic gas detectors etc.

37. Membership of Common Environmental Infrastructure including TSDF, CHWIF etc. (Whichever

is applicable)

38. Submit the criteria for assessing waste generation and area to be catered by the proposed

project.

39. Submit a copy of the layout plan of project site showing Biomedical waste storage, green belt

(width & length, 33% of the project area), all roads, prominent wind direction, processing plant &

buildings etc. should be provided.

40. Submit the details of the road/rail connectivity along with the likely impacts and mitigative

measures

41. Examine the details of transportation of wastes, and its safety in handling.

42. Examine and submit the details of on line pollutant monitoring.

43. Submit details of measures to be taken for control of air pollution including measures to control

emission of Dioxin and Furan.

44. Examine and submit details of monitoring of water quality around the proposed site.

45. Examine and submit details of the odour control measures.

46. Examine and submit details of impact on water body/ground water and mitigative measures

during rainy season.

47. Environmental Management Plan should be accompanied with Environmental Monitoring

Plan and environmental cost and benefit assessment. Regular monitoring shall be carried

out for odour control.

48. Submit details of a comprehensive Disaster Management Plan including details of fire safety

measure, emergency evacuation during natural and man-made disaster.

49. Submit details of nearest biomedical waste treatment facilities

50. (a) Does the company have a well laid down Environment Policy approved by its Board of

Directors? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA report.(b). Does the Environment Policy prescribe

for standard operating process / procedures to bring into focus any infringement / deviation /

violation of the environmental or forest norms / conditions ? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA.

51. What is the hierarchical system or administrative order of the company to deal with the

environmental issues and for ensuring compliance with the EC conditions. Details of this

system may be given.

52. Records of any legalbreach of Environmental laws i.e. details of show- cause notices, closure

notices etc. served by the GPCB to the existing unit in last five years and actions taken then

after for prevention of pollution.

53. Environmental audit reports for last 3 years and compliance of its

recommendations/Suggestions. (Include latest audit report and its compliance.)

54. Copy of Consent to Operate (CC&A) obtained along with point wise compliance status of all the

conditions stipulated therein.

55. Compliance of MoEFCC circulars vide No: J-11011/618/2010-IAII (I) dated 30/05/2012 and J-

11013/41/2006-IA-II(I) dated 20/10/2009.

56. Copies of XGN generated Inspection reports with analysis reports of the water/Air/Hazardous

samples collected by GPCB (Last 2 year). Copies of instructions issued by GPCB in last 2 year

and point wise compliance thereof.

57. Does the company have a system of reporting of non compliances / violations of environmental

norms to the Board of Directors of the company and / or shareholders or stakeholders at large?

This reporting mechanism should be detailed in the EIA Report.

58. Certificate of accreditation issued by the NABET, QCI to the environmental consultant should be

of 64


Page 15 of 64

incorporated in the EIA Report.

The TOR prescribed as above shall be considered as generic TORs for preparation of the EIA report in

addition to all the relevant information as per the generic structure of EIA given in Appendix III in the

EIA Notification, 2006.



4 SIA/GJ/IND2/21068/2017 Amity Resins Plot No. 1636, Chemical Zone Notified Industrial Area, GIDC Sarigam, Taluka: Umbergaon, District: Valsad 396155, Gujarat.




• This is a New of unit process manufacturing of synthetic organic chemicals as tabulated below: S.

No. Name of the Products CAS No.

Quantity, TPM

End-Use of Product

1.

Phenol Formaldehyde Resin (PF Resin) OR Melamine

Formaldehyde Resin (MF Resin) OR Urea Formaldehyde Resin

(UF Resin)

9003-35-4 / 9003-08-1 /9011-05-6

1000

Used in Grinding Wheels, Brake Linings, Foundry Shell Moulding, Laminates, Plywood, Ink Industries, Industrial laminates, Tyre Industries, Rubber Industries etc.


notification 2006.



S. No.

Particulars Details

A. Total cost of Proposed Project (Rs. in Crores): 6.41 Crores

i. Capital cost for EMS (Environmental Management System): 0.4 Crores

ii. Recurring cost towards the environmental protection measures: 0.1 Crores per Annum. B. Total Plot Area ( sq. meter) 1601 sq. meter

i. Green Belt Area,/Tree Plantation Area ( sq. meter) 400 sq. meter C. Employment Generation

i. Direct 20 Nos.

ii. Indirect 10 Nos. D. Water

i.

Source of Water Supply (GIDC, Bore Well, Surface Water etc...)

GIDC, Sarigam Water Supply

Status of permission from the concern authority: Permission letter issued by GIDC Sarigam vide Letter No. GIDC/DEE/SRG/371 dated 16/11/2017

ii. Water Consumption (KLD)

of 64


Page 16 of 64

Category Quantity, KLD

(G) Domestic 2.0

(H) Gardening 1.0

(I) Industrial 5.0

Process --

Washing -- Boiler --

Cooling 4.0

Others (Floor/Container washing) 1.0 Total (A+B+C) 8.0

iii. Wastewater Generation (KLD)

- Category Quantity, KLD Remarks

(E) Domestic 2.0 -- (F) Industrial --

Process 24.23 -- Washing - Product Washing

Boiler - --

Cooling 0.5 -- Others 1.0 Floor/Container Washing

Total Industrial 25.73 Total Wastewater (A+B) 27.73

iv. Treatment facility with capacity (ETP, CETP, MEE, STP etc).

Effluent generated will be treated in proposed effluent treatment plant (ETP) of capacity of 30 KLD.

v. Mode of Disposal & Final meeting point

Domestic: Generated domestic liquid waste will be disposed off through septic tank system to drainage line. Industrial: Industrial liquid effluent generation during the manufacturing of products will be treated in proposed solvent extraction for phenol recovery followed by primary, secondary and tertiary treatment units and finally sent to CETP Sarigam through underground effluent drainage line for further treatment.

vi. Reuse/Recycle details (KLD) Nil vii. Details of rainwater harvesting Will be done.

E. Air

i. Flue gas emission details No. of Boilers/TFH/Furnaces/DG Sets etc. with capacities viz. TPH, Kcal/Hr, MT/Hr, KVA etc.

S. No.

Source of emission

With Capacity e.g.

Boiler (8 TPH)


Name of the fuel

Quantity of Fuel MT/Hr & MT/Day

APCM

Type of emissions i.e. Air Pollutant

s

Emission Standards

1. Thermic fluid

heater (20 lacs k cal/hr)

11 Furnace

Oil 42 kg/Hr

Adequate stack will

be provided

PM SOx NOx

<PM: 150 mg/Nm3

<SO2:100 ppm <NOx: 50 ppm

ii. Process gas i.e. Type of pollutant gases (SOx, HCl, NH3, Cl2, NOxetc.)

There will be NO PROCESS GAS EMISSION.

iii. Fugitive emission details with its mitigation measures. � Concrete road will be developed within plot premises to avoid fugitive dust due to vehicle

movement. � Manufacturing activity will be carried out in closed reactors/vessels.

of 64


Page 17 of 64

� Regular checking and maintenance of the same will be carried out to avoid any leakages. � All the raw materials will be stored in closed containers and in sealed bags and will be

handled through closed system to avoid the handling losses. F. Hazardous waste

(As per the Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Trans boundary Movement) Rules 2016.

i.

S. No.


waste


Category and Schedule as

per HW Rules.

Quantity (MT/Annum)

Disposal Method

1. ETP Waste ETP Schedule I

35.3 20.0

Dispose off into TSDF, SEPPL

Kutch

2. Used Oil Manufacturing

Process Schedule I

5.1 0.01

Sell to Registered re-

processers

3. Discarded containers

Raw Material/ Product storage and from utility

Schedule I 33.1

1.0 Sell to

authorized recycler

Quantity of all the wastes including discarded containers must be in MT/Annum.

ii. Membership details of CETP, TSDF, CHWIF, Common MEE etc.

We will obtain CETP Sarigam Clean initiative for the disposal of treated solid waste and membership of approved TSDF site of M/S SEPPL, Kutch, for disposal of Hazardous waste.

iii. Details of Non-Hazardous waste & its disposal (MSW and others)

Nil

G. Solvent Management (If any)

i. Details of Solvent recovery � Process For Phenol Recovery System (Solvent Extraction):

• The water of reaction generated from the process of Phenolic resin having 3-5% w/w of dissolved phenol, 0.5 -1.5% w/w of formaldehyde and traces of resin residue with water (95-96% w/w).

• The said water of reaction is collected in collection tank having pH is 2-3. The acidic effluent is neutralized with sodium sulphite up to pH 6.0-6.5. The treatment with sodium sulphite is also help to reduce formaldehyde content (around 0.5% w/w), thus COD value will also reduce.

• The treated effluent is settled to separate out any formation sludge. If pH exceeds 7.5 to 8.0, then the process of extraction will be disturbed.

• The Sodium sulphite will be dosed in the controlled manner with stirring on to keep the pH range in 6.0 to 6.5 in the tank. This will be monitored by pH meter on the tank.

• The primary treated effluent is extracted with Butyl Acetate solvent. The extraction column (C-101) is equipped with special type of structured packing.

• The heavy phase (effluent) will be pumped to the top of column and light phase (BA) will pass through bottom nozzle. Extraction Column (C-101) top product will pass through static mixer & will then separate in Coalescer.

• The Coalescer top extract organic product with traces of water will be collected in separate tank (V-104). The raffinate water from bottom of separator will be collected in a separate tank (V-103).The extract product will be preheated to 90-950C in plate heat exchange (PHE-3) and will be fed in distillation column (C-102).

• The Re boiler (RE-102) is equipped with circulation of hot oil. The column C-102 is under Vacuum. The vapors are condensed in top mounted primary and secondary condenser.

• The recovered distilled (Butyl Acetate) is partly refluxed and Butyl Acetate thus collected

of 64


Page 18 of 64

in storage tank (V-106) is reused. The phenol collected in Re boiler (RE- 101) is taken out in drums from time to time for reuse.

• The extraction column (C-101) bottom will be pumped through preheater (E-104). The preheated water is fed to stripping column (C-103). The Butyl acetate is stripped off along with water vapor.

• All the vapor generated is condensed in condenser E-105. The distillate is separated in separator (V-107). The part of distillate is refluxed back to stripper column (C-103).

• The Butyl acetate collected in separator (V-107) is reused & final treated effluent water after cooler is collected in storage tank (V-108) for further treatment.

� The consumption of Chemicals and Recovery of Phenol are as under: Total Effluent : 24.230 KLD Butyl Acetate (Recovered) : 9.680 KLD Butyl Acetate (Fresh) : 0.362 KLD Sodium Sulphite : 40 kg/day Phenol Recovered : 1020 kg/day

� Details of Phenol Recovery System: Average hydraulic load : 24.23 KLD Design Flow : 25.00 KLD Average COD : 165000-176000 mg/L Average BOD : 50000-53000 mg/L Average Phenol : 30000-35000 mg/L

S. No.

Particulars Capacity MOC

1. Collection Tank 20 KL HDPE 2. Sodium Sulphite Dosing Tank 0.1 KL HDPE

3. Butyl Acetate Storage Tank 4 KL HDPE 4. Recovered Phenol Storage Tank 2 KL HDPE

5. Solvent Extraction Plant 1 No. -

� Solvent Extraction Plant:

of 64


Page 19 of 64

� Details of Phenol Recovery System:

S. No.

Equipment Tag Equipment Name Capacity

1. V-101 HDPE Tank 10000 LTR.

2. C-101 Extraction Column - 3. SM-1 Static Mixer -

4. Cs-2 Coalescer Separator - 5. V-104 Extract Tank 600 LTR.

6. PHE-9 Plate Type Exchanger -

7. V-103 Raffinate Tank - 8. V-106 Solvent Tank 1000 LTR.

9. V-104 Extract Tank 600 LTR. 10. RE-101 Re Tank 1600 LTR.

11. C-102 Distillation Column - 12. C-101 Condenser 4 M SQ.

13. C-102 Condenser 15 M SQ.

14. E-107 Sub Cooler - 15. E-103 Sub Cooler -

16. VCP-09 Vacuum Catch Pot 980 LTR. 17. V-106 Solvent Tank 1000 LTR.

18. C-103 Stripper Column - 19. E-104 Heat Exchanger 4 M SQ.

20. E-105 Condenser 3 M SQ.

21. E-106 Sub Cooler - 22. V-107 Receiver 300 LTR.

23. V-108 HDPE Tank 5000 LTR.

of 64


Page 20 of 64

24. CP-01/2/3/4/5/6 Centrifugal Pump - 25. VP-09 Vacuum Pump -

26. DP-06 Diaphragm Pump -

� Characteristics of process effluent after Phenol Recovery:

S. No.

Effluent Parameter Untreated Process

Effluent After Phenol Recovery by Solvent Extraction

1. pH 2.3 7.6

2. Color pt. Co 100 80

3. Suspended solids , mg/L 62 60

4. Total dissolved solids, mg/L 510 500

5.. Oil and grease, mg/L ND ND

6. NH3-N, mg/L ND ND

7. BOD , mg/L 52690 3052

8. COD , mg/L 176000 10184

9. Heavy metal, mg/L ND ND

10. Phenolic Compounds, mg/L 32510 2.59

� Process for Effluent treatment plant after Phenol Recovery

• The effluent from the process having 32,000 mg/L of Phenol and about 176000 mg/l of COD, which is taken for phenol recovery. After phenol recovery, the effluent having Phenol is 2.59 mg/l and COD is around 10184 mg/l.

• The effluent is collected in a collection tank along with other effluent from cooling tower and floor/container washing. From where is transferred to H2O2 treatment tank to reduce any traces of organic and phenol.

• The H2O2 treated effluent is filtered in a filter nutsch. Clear effluent is taken to aeration tank where bio mass is developed. Supernant effluent from aeration tank is taken to secondary settling tank for settling of biomass. Biomass is recirculating in aeration tank and excess biomass is taken to filter nutsch for dewatering.

• Clear effluent is passes through sand bed filter and activated carbon filter to remove traces of phenol and organic and finally discharge into underground effluent drainage line to CETP, Sarigam for further treatment.

� DETAILS OF EFFLUENT TREATMENT PLANT

Average Hydraulic Load : 25.73 KLD Design Hydraulic Load : 30 KLD Average Inlet BOD : 2850 mg/L Average Inlet COD : 9239 mg/L Average Phenol : 2.5 mg/L

S. No.

Name of the Unit Size (m) Capacity

(m3) MOC Nos.

1. Oil/Grease Trap 0.6 x 0.6 x 0.6 0.2 RCC 1

2. Collection With Sparger 2.5 x 2.5 x 2.5 15 RCC 1 3. Reaction Tank with Stirrer 1.0 ø x 2.0 1.6 HDPE 1

4. Floculator 1.0 ø x 2.0 1.6 MSRL 1 5. Chemical Dosing Tanks - 0.2 HDPE 3

6. Primary Lamella Separator with

Tube Deck Packing 1.5 x 1.5 x 2.0 4.5 MSFRP 1

of 64


Page 21 of 64

7. Aeration Tank With Build in

Clarifier with Tube Deck 4 x 3 x 3 36 RCC 1

8. Twin Lobe Air Blower 5000 mmwg 200 nm3/Hr CI 1

9. Holding Tank 1 x 1 x 1.5 1.5 RCC 1

10. Sand Bed Filter 1.0 ø x 2.0 1.6 MS/FRP 1 11. Activated Carbon Filter 1.0 ø x 2.0 1.6 MS/FRP 1

12. Holding Tank 1 x 1 x 1 1.0 HDPE 1 13. SDB 2 x 2 x 0.5 4 m2 Bricks 1

ii. VOC emission sources and its mitigation measures Not Applicable

Technical presentation was made by the project proponent. Since the proposed location of the unit is

outside GIDC, water consumption, fuel consumption and inclusion of chemicals covered under MAH

category was discussed for the proposal and it weas noted that proposal falls under category

B.Committee noted that proposal is new for resin manufacturing. Proposed water consumption is 8

KLPD and waste water generation is 27.73 KLPD. Additional waste water is due to generation of water

during process. 25.73 KLPD of industrial waste water will be treated in proposed solvent extraction for

phenol recovery followed by primary, secondary and tertiary treatment units and finally will be sent to

CETP Sarigam through underground effluent drainage line for further treatment. It is noted that there is

no process gas emission.



recommended by SEAC vide letter no. EIA-10-GEN-21/1480 dated 14/09/2017 and approved by SEIAA

in its 12th meeting dated 16/09/2017 for the EIA study to be done covering 10 Km radial distance from

the project boundary.

1. Adequacy of proposed area with respect to plant machineries , EMS, green belt , safety aspect,

raw material & product storage considering worst case scenario. Submit proper lay out plan

clearly demarcating all activities with scale.

2. Techno-economic feasibility of solvent extraction system with reference to the quality of

solvent/waste water proposed to be treated for phenol and other solvent recovery from waste

water.

3. Leak detection and repairing programme (LDAR) for curbing VOCs in the ambient air including

chemical characteristic of all solvents proposed to be used in resin manufacturing.

The TOR prescribed as above and as per the standard TOR approved by SEIAA and the model ToRs

available in the MoEFCC’s sector specific EIA Manual for ‘Synthetic Organic Chemical Industry’

shall be considered as generic TORs for preparation of the EIA report in addition to all the relevant

information as per the generic structure of EIA given in Appendix III in the EIA Notification, 2006.



5 SIA/GJ/IND2/21101/2017 JEFF IINDUSTRIES Plot No: 198, Rampur, Talod GIDC industrial Estate Talod, Sabarkantha


Category of the Project: 5(f)

of 64


Page 22 of 64

Project Status: Expansion (New Project for Environment Clearance)


• This is anExpansion of unit process manufacturing of synthetic organic chemicals as tabulated below:

SR.

NO PRODUCT NAME

CAPACITY IN KG/MONTH

EXISTING PROPOSE

D ULTIMATE

NON EC Product

01 Cupric Chloride Hydrous 10000

NIL

10000

02 Cupric Chloride Anhydrous 10000 10000

03 Magnesium Oxide 20000 20000

04 Zinc Sulphate Monohydrate 10000 10000

EC Product

05 Beclomethasone Dipropionate

NIL

25 25

06 Betamethasone 10 10

07 Betamethasone Dipropionate 25 25

08 Betamethasone Sodium Phosphate 20 20

09 Betamethasone Valerate 20 20

10 Clobetasol Propionate 30 30

11 Clobetasol Butyrate 10 10

12 Dexamethasone Acetate 5 5

13 Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate 100 100

14 Fluticasone Propionate 5 5

15 Hydrocortisone Acetate 33 33

16 Hydrocortisone Hemi Succinate

(Hydrocortisone Hydrogen Succinate) 5 5

17 Methyl Prednisolone 10 10

18 Methyl Prednisolone Acetate 10 10

19 Methyl Prednisolone Hemi Succinate 5 5

20 Mometasone Furoate 20 20

21 Prednisolone Acetate 50 50

22 Prednisolone Sodium Phosphate 10 10

23 Triamcinolone 5 5

24 Triamcinolone Acetonide 5 5

25 Deflazacort 50 50

26 Helobetasol Propionate 2 2

27 Methyl Cobalamin 500 500

28 Calcium Stearate 25000 25000

29 Zinc Stearate 25000 25000

30 Magnesium Stearate 25000 25000

31 Calcium Citrate 5000 5000

32 Croscarmellose Sodium 10000 10000

33 Sodium Starch Glycollate 10000 10000

34 Combiflame Citrate 2000 2000

of 64


Page 23 of 64

• The project falls under category B of project activity 1(d) as per the schedule of the EIA

notification 2006.



Sr. no.

Particulars Details

A Water

i


GIDC Estate

Status of permission from the concern authority.


Sr No

Category

Water Consumption in KL/Day

EXISTING PROPOSED PROPOSED

TOTAL

1. Domestic Purpose 1.5 0.5 2.0

2.

INDUSTRIAL

Process - 2.62 2.62 Boiler 2.50 NIL 2.50

Ancillary 0.05 0.1 0.15

Total water Consumption ( Domestic)

1.5 0.5 2.0

Total water Consumption (Industrial )

2.55 2.72 5.27


-

Sr No

Category

Wastewater Generation in KL/Day

EXISTING PROPOSED PROPOSED

TOTAL

1. Domestic Purpose 1.5 0.3 2.0

2.

INDUSTRIAL

Process - 2.5 2.5 Boiler (Blow Down) 0.05 NIL 0.05

Ancillary 0.05 0.1 0.15

Total Wastewater generation (Domestic)

1.5 0.5 2.0

Total Wastewater generation (Industrial)

0.1 2.6 2.7

.


ZERO DISCHARGE UNIT


Domestic: Soak Pit Industrial:We have 2.7 KLD industrial waste water is sent to Evaporation for the waste water evaporate. The unit will remain ZERO DISCHARGE UNIT

vi Reuse/Recycle details (KL/day) NO

B Air (Existing and Proposed)

35 Methyl Paraben IP 10000 10000

of 64


Page 24 of 64


Sr no

Stack attached to

Stack height

in meter Fuel Consumption APCM Remark

1. Small

Industrial Boiler (1 TPH)

11.00 Agro Waste /Imported

Coal 55 Kg/hr

Cyclone Separator

Existing

2 DG Set 5.00 HSD 10 L/hr Acoustic

Enclosure

- ii Process gas i.e. Type of pollutant gases (SO2, HCl, NH3, Cl2, NOx etc.)

(Existing and Proposed)

Sr no

Vent Attached To Stack

height in meter

APCM Pollutant

Concentration Remark

1. Reactor 7.00 Alkali scrubber Cl2 < 9 mg/Nm3 Existing

V Fugitive emission details with its mitigation measures. (Existing And Proposed)

Read in Section 3.3 of PFR Attached with application

C Hazardous waste (as per the Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules 2016.(Existing and Proposed)

I Quantity of discarded containers must be in MT/Annum.

Sr. No

Types of Hazardous

Waste Category Existing Propose Ultimate Disposal

1 Spent Oil 5.1 0.010

MT/Year 0.2

MT/ Year 0.21

MT/ Year

Collection, storage, Transportation and Dispose to Active

TSDF Site

2 Discarded Container/

Bags 33.1

0.50 MT / Year

1.0 MT/Year

1.5 MT/Year

Collection, storage, Transportation and

Dispose to Registered Recycler

3 ETP

Sludge 35.3 NIL

2.00 MT/Year

2.00 MT/Year

Collection, storage, Transportation and

Dispose to TSDF Site


Not Applicable


Not Applicable

D

i Spent Solvent management (If any) Not Applicable

ii VOC emission sources and its mitigation measures

Not Applicable

Technical presentation was made by the project proponent.. Committee noted CC&A compliance of the

existing unit. PP mentioned that there is no public complaint or any litigation pending before any court

of law. After the proposed expansion, water consumption proposed is 5.27 KLPD and waste water

of 64


Page 25 of 64

generation is 2.70 KLPD. PP could not explain techno-economic feasibility of the evaporator proposed

to be installed in-house. Committee also felt that details of solvent used and their losses need to be

addressed adequately at the stage of issuance of TOR. It was also asked to explore alternative option

for pursuing zero discharge with reuse/recycle possibilities of treated waste water.

The location of the proposed unit is virgin in its class of product, hence after technical presentation it

was decided to consider the proposal in one of the upcoming meeting upon submission of following

details :

1. Adequate proposal for zero discharge by the project proponent with techno-economical

feasibility for zero liquid discharge.




3. Solvent handling and management plan for maximum recovery of solvent.

6 SIA/GJ/MIS/21042/2017 M/s. Vikashtex Envirotech CETP Pvt. Ltd. Block No. 523,Village: Hathoda, Taluka: Mangrol, Dist: Surat-394 405, Gujarat.

Screening & Scoping

Category of the Project: 7(h) Project Status: New

• This office has received an application vide their online proposal no. SIA/GJ/MIS/21042/2017 dated 23/11/2017 regarding grant of Terms of Reference [ToR] for preparation of EIA/EMP report.

• This is a New of unit process manufacturing of common infrastructure facility as tabulated below:

Sr. No.

Treatment Facility Industry Type

Water Jet Looms (Capacity)

Yarn Dyeing (Capacity)

Phase-I Phase-II Phase-I Phase-II

1 Common Effluent Treatment Plant (CETP)

3.5 MLD 3.5 MLD 1.5 MLD 1.5 MLD

Total 7.0 MLD 3.0 MLD

Grand Total 10 MLD

• The project falls under category B of project activity 7 (h) as per the schedule of the EIA

notification 2006.



Sr. no.

Particulars Details

Total cost of Proposed Project (Rs. in Crores): Total: 15.0 Crores 1. Capital cost for EMS (Environmental Management System): 13.0 Crores

2. Recurring cost towards the environmental protection measures: 0.1 Crores per Annum Total Plot area ( sq. meter) Total: 9,632

Green belt area,/Tree Plantation area ( sq. meter) Total: 1,300 C Employment generation

of 64


Page 26 of 64

1. Direct Total: 18 Nos.

2. Indirect Total: 10 Nos.

D Water

i


Bore Well (1 No.) within premises.

Status of permission from the concern authority. Refer: Annexure-1.


Sr. No. Particular Water Consumption Quantity (KL/Day)

Phase-I Phase-I

Industrial

Water Jet Looms

1 CETP Process 5 5 2 Washing 5 5

Yarn Dyeing

3 CETP Process 20 20

4 Washing 5 5 Total (Industrial) 35 35

5 Domestic 5 4 6 Gardening 7 --

Total 47 39

Grand Total 86.0*

* Total raw water consumption will be required while CETP will be operating at peak capacity.

iii Waste water generation (KL/day) Sr. No.

Particular Waste Water Generation Quantity (KL/Day)

W/W Mode of Treatment/Disposal

Phase-I Phase-II

Industrial

Water Jet Looms

1 CETP Process -- -- --

2 Washing 5 5 Treated in CETP only.

Yarn Dyeing

3 CETP Process -- -- --

4 Washing 5 5 Treated in CETP only.

Total (Industrial) 10 10 --

5 Domestic 4.5 3.5 Septic tank & Soak pit or CETP

6 Gardening -- -- --

Total 14.5 13.5 --

Grand Total 28.0 --

iv Treatment facility with capacity(CETP). COMMON EFFLUENT TREATMENT PLANT (CETP) – 3.0 MLD – YARN DYEING INDUSTRIES:

• Treatment Process Description (Phase-I and Phase-II)

� Effluent shall be passed through Screen Chamber-1 (SC-01) where floating material shall be removed from effluent and collected in Equalization cum Neutralization Tanks (ENTs-01). Here lime shall be added from Lime Dosing Tanks (LDTs-01) to adjust the pH of the

of 64


Page 27 of 64

effluent. Pipe grid will be provided at bottom of the ENTs-01 to keep all suspended solids in suspension and to provide proper mixing. 2 nos. of Air Blowers (B-01) shall supply air through diffusers to pipe grid.

� Then effluent is, thereafter, equalized wastewater shall be pumped to Flash Mixer where Alum and Poly shall be added from Alum (ADTs-01) and Poly Dosing Tanks (PDTs-01) respectively. The effluent shall be collected in Dissolved Air Floatation Unit (DAF-01), where the effluent mixed at high pressure with air and Oil & Grease float on the top with air bubbles. Oil & Grease shall be removed from the top with help of oil skimmer (OS-01) and collected in Oil & Grease Collection tank-1 (OGRT-01). Solids will be settled at bottom of DAF-01 shall be sent to Sludge Sump (SS-01) and Effluent Recycle Pump (P-02) will recycle effluent and it is mixed with air supplied by Air Compressor (AC-01) in Air Dissolving Tube (ADT-01). Then it will be recycled into DAF Unit.

� Thereafter, Overflow from DAF-01 shall be collected Moving Beds Bio Reactors (MBBR-01). Here, Biodegradation of organic matter of the wastewater shall be carried out by bacteria (attached growth). In MBBR tank dissolved organics shall be removed with the help of bacteria in presence of oxygen provided by Root blowers (B-02) through diffused aeration system. MBBR tank will be loaded with special media which inhibits attached bacterial growth. Due to this attached growth the quantity of sludge generation will be very little and also the treatment will be more effective in a very less retention time. The biggest advantage of this system is it does not require recirculation of activated sludge.

� The overflow of the MBBR-01 shall be diverted into the Secondary Clarifier (SCL-01) for biomass separation. An appropriate retention time will be given to the effluent to ensure proper settling. The sludge settles down into the bottom of the SCL-01 and shall be collected in Sludge Sump.

� Thereafter, overflow (clear supernatant) of SCL-01 shall be collected in Intermediate

Sump-1(IS-01). Then effluent from the IS shall be pumped to pumped to the Pressure

Sand Filters-1 (PSF-01) and Activated Carbon Filters-1 (ACF-01) for tertiary

treatment. The effluent shall enter into the sand filter from the top and the filtered

effluent shall be further passed to the Activated Carbon Filter for polishing

treatment. For backwash, the effluent from the Intermediate Sump-1 shall be

pumped at the bottom of the sand filter (and / or carbon filter) and the discharge of

the sand filter (and / or carbon filter) shall be diverted into the Equalization cum

Neutralization Tank for further treatment. Treated effluent shall be collected in

Treated Effluent Sump-1 (TES-01) and drain to Ghoda Khadi for final disposal.

� The solids settled in DAF-01 and SCL-01 shall be collected in Sludge Sump. From SS-01 it will be pumped to Filter Press (FP-01). Sludge cake from Filter press-1 & 2 shall be collected and packed into the plastic bags and stored in the HWSA for ultimate disposal to TSDF. The leachate from the FP-01-A/B shall be collected in Drain Pit and then pumped back to Equalization cum Neutralisation tank (ENTs-01) for further treatment.

CETP Units Name and Size:

Sr. No.

Name of Unit Size (m X m X m) L x B x H (LD+FB)

Phase-I Nos

Phase-II Nos

MOC/ Remark

1 Screen Chamber-1 (SC-01)

3.3 x 2.0 x (0.1+0.3)

1 1 RCC M25 + A/A BK. Lining

2 Equalization cum Neutralisation Tanks (ENsT-01)

10.0 x 8.0 (3 + 0.3 FB)

2 1 RCC M25 + A/A BK. Lining

3 Flash Mixer-1 (FM-01) 4.0 x 3.0 x (3.5 + 0.3)

1 - RCC M25

of 64


Page 28 of 64

4 Dissolved Air Floatation (DAF-01)

7.5 x 5.0 x (3.0 + 0.3)

1 1 RCC M25

5 O & G Collection Tank-1 (OGCT-01)

1500 Lit 1 - HDPE

6 Moving Beds Bio Reactors (MBBR-01)

12.8 x7.5 x (4.5 + 0.5)

1 1 RCC M25

7 Secondary Clarifier (SC-01)

12.0 Ø x (3.0 SWD+ 0.5)

1 1 RCC M25

8 Intermediate Sump-1 (IS-01)

10.0 x 4.5 x (4.0 + 0.3)

1 - RCC M25

9 Pressure Sand Filters-1 (PSF-01)

40 m3/hr 2 2 MOC = MSEP

10 Activated Carbon Filters-1 (ACF-01)

40 m3/hr 2 2 MOC = MSEP

11 Treated Effluent Sump-1 (TES-01)

12.5 X 10 x (4.0 +0.3)

1 1 RCC M25

12 Sludge Sumps (SS-01) 4.0 x 4.0 x (3.0+0.5)

2 1 RCC M25

13 Filter Press (FP-01) 200 m3/D 2 2 RCC M20 with Roof Truss

14 Filter Press Shed Area 15.0 x 8.0 1 - RCC M20 with Roof Truss

15 Drain Pit-1 (DP-01) 2.0 x 2.0 x (2.0+0.5)

1 - RCC M25

16 Lime Dosing Tanks (LDT-01)

2.0 x 2.0 x (2.0 + 0.5 HB +0.5 FB)

2 1 HDPE

17 Alum Dosing Tanks (ADT-01)

3000 lit capacity 2 1 HDPE

18 Poly Dosing Tank-1 (PDT-01)

1500 lit capacity 1 - HDPE

19 Poly Dosing Tank-2 (PDT-02)

1500 lit capacity 1 - HDPE

Common Facility

19 Security cabin 3.0 x 3.0 1 - RCC M20 + BKMS

20 Office Building cum Laboratory

10.0 x 10.0 1 - RCC M20 + BKMS

21 MCC & PLC Room (MCC)

10.0 x 8.0 1 - RCC M20 + BKMS

22 Chemical Storage Room (CH)

10.0 x 10.0 1 - RCC M20 + BKMS

23 Hazardous Waste Storage Area (HWSA)

12.0 x 10.0 1 - RCC M20 + Roof truss

RCC M25/M20 = Reinforced Cement Concrete (M 25/M20 Grade) BKMS = Brick Masonry FB = Free Board SWD = Side Water Depth COMMON EFFLUENT TREATMENT PLANT (CETP) - 7.0 MLD – WATER JET LOOMS

of 64


Page 29 of 64

• Treatment Process Description (Phase-I and Phase-II)

� Effluent shall be passed through Screen Chamber-2(SC-02) where Screen (S-02) shall be provided to remove floating material. Then it will be collected in Oil & Grease Trap (OGT-01) where Oil & Grease will be removed from the top with help of Oil & Grease Removal Mechanism (OGRM-01) and collected in Oil & Grease Collection Tank-2 (OGCT-02). Then effluent shall be collected in collection cum Equalization Tanks (CETs-01). Pipe grid will be provided at bottom of the CETs-01 to keep all suspended solids in suspension and to provide proper mixing. 3 nos. of Air Blowers (B-03) shall supply air through diffusers to pipe grid.

� Thereafter, equalized wastewater shall be pumped to Flash Mixer-2 (FM-02) where PAC solution shall be added from PAC Dosing Tank (PACDT-01). Then effluent will be collected in Primary Clarifier (PCL-01) where Suspended and coagulated solids shall be settled at bottom. The settled solids will be sent to Sludge Sump (SS-01) and clear supernatant shall be collected in Intermediate Sump-2(IS-02).

� Thereafter effluent shall be pumped to the Pressure Sand Filters-2 (PSFs) and Activated Carbon Filters-2 (ACFs) for tertiary treatment. The effluent shall enter into the sand filter from the top and the filtered effluent shall be further passed to the Activated Carbon Filters-2 for polishing treatment. For backwash, the effluent from the Treated Effluent Sump-2 shall be pumped at the bottom of the sand filter (and / or carbon filter) and the discharge of the sand filter (and / or carbon filter) shall be diverted into the Drain Pit-2.

� Thereafter treated effluent shall be collected in Treated Effluent Sump-2 (TES-02) before sent to Ultra Filtration (UF) Unit (UF-01). UF Treated water shall be collected in UF Product Water Tank (UFPWT-01) before sent/sold to member Industries for their reuse. Reject from UF Units shall be sent ENT-01 of module-1 for further treatment and back wash from PSF-2 and ACF-2 shall be collected in Drain Pit-2 and shall be sent back to Collection cum Equalisation Tank for further treatment.

CETP and UF Units Name and Size

Sr. No.

Name of Unit Size (m X m X m) L x B x H (LD+FB)

Phase-I

Nos

Phase-II

Nos

MOC/ Remark

1 Screen Chamber-2 (SC-02)

3.3 x 2.5 x (0.1+0.3) 1 1 RCC M25

2 O & G Trap (OGT-01) 6.5 x 2.5 x (2.5+0.5) 1 1 RCC M25

3 O & G Collection Tank-2(OGCT-02)

1500 Lit. 1 1 RCC M25

4 Collection cum Equalization Tanks (CETs-01)

10.0x 8.0x (3.0 + 0.3)

2 1 RCC M25

5 Flash Mixer-2 (FM-02) 4.0 x 4.0 x (3.5 + 0.5)

1 1 RCC M25

6 Primary Clarifier (PCL-01)

18.0 Dia x (3.5 SWD + 0.5)

1 1 RCC M25

7 Intermediate Sump-2 (IS-02)

10.0 x 7.0 x (4.0+0.4)

1 1 RCC m25

8 Pressure Sand Filters-2 (PSFs-02)

90 m3/hr 2+1 2+1 MOC = MSEP

9 Activated Carbon Filters-2 (ACsF-02)

90 m3/hr 2+1 2+1 MOC = MSEP

10 Treated Effluent Sump-2 (TES-02)

12.5 X 10 x (4.0 +0.3)

1 1 RCC M25

of 64


Page 30 of 64

11 PAC Dosing Tank (PACDT-01)

2000 Lit 1 1 RCC M25

12 UF Units (UFs-01) 87.5 m3/hr 2 2 RCC M20 with Roof Truss

13 UF Units Shed Area 20.0 x 15.0 1 - RCC M20 with Roof Truss

14 UF Product Water Tank (UFPWT-01)

10.0 x 8.0x (3.0+0.3) 1 1 RCC M25

RCC M25/M20 = Reinforced Cement Concrete (M 25/M20 Grade) BKMS = Brick Masonry FB = Free Board LD = Liquid Depth SWD = Side Water Depth

V Mode of Disposal & Final meeting point

Domestic:Domestic waste water will be disposed of through septic tank/soak pit or CETP. Industrial:

• RawEffluent from Yarn dyeing member industries will be treated in CETP and treated effluent shall be disposed/drain to Ghoda Khadi, Taluka Mangrol.

• RawEffluent from Water Jet Loomsmember industries will be treated in CETP and treated effluent shall be sent/sold to member industries for reuse.

Vi Reuse/Recycle details (KL/day) RawEffluent from Water Jet Loomsmember industries will be treated in CETP and treated effluent shall be sent/sold to member industries for reuse.

vii Details of rainwater harvesting Company will develop rain water harvesting system with ground water recharge technique by using rain water from non-process buildings and roof top water of all other buildings. All storm water drains will be routed such as to reach extreme corner of site & then shall harvest the same to ground water through well.

E Air

i Flue gas emission details: No. of Boilers/TFH/Furnaces/DG sets etc. with capacities viz. TPH, Kcal/hr, MT/hr, KVA etc.

Sr. No.

Stack attached to


Stack Diameter (meter)

Fuel name & Quantity

Type of Emission

Permissible limit

APCM

1 D.G. Set-1*(250 KVA)

5 0.15 Diesel 50

Liters/hr.

PM SO2 NOx

150 mg/m3 100 ppm 50 ppm

Adequate Stack height

with Stack Monitoring

Facility

2 D.G. Set-2*(250 KVA)

5 0.15 Diesel 50

Liters/hr.

PM SO2 NOx

150 mg/m3 100 ppm 50 ppm

* To be used in emergency only.

ii Process gas i.e. Type of pollutant gases (SO2, HCl, NH3, Cl2, NOxetc.) – Not Applicable. v Fugitive emission details with its mitigation measures.

• Care will be taken to store construction material/s properly to prevent fugitive emissions, if any.

• Regular maintenance of valves, pumps, flanges, joints and other equipment will be done to prevent leakages and thus minimizing the fugitive emissions.

• Periodic monitoring of work area will be carried out to check the fugitive emission.

• To eliminate chances of leakages from glands of pumps, mechanical seal will be

of 64


Page 31 of 64

provided.

• Enclosures to material/s storage area, collection of emission from loading of raw material/s through hoods and ducts by induced draft, and control by scrubber / dust collector to be ensured.

F Hazardous waste (as per the Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules 2016.

i TYPE OF WASTE

CETP Sludge Used Oil Discarded Containers/Bags/Drum

s

CATEGORY NO.

34.3 5.1 33.3

SOURCE Effluent Treatment Process

From Moving Machineries

From Raw Material/s Handling

Quantity

Phase-I 200 MT/Month 10 Liters/Month 100 Nos./Month

Phase-II 200 MT/Month 10 Liters/Month 100 Nos./ Month

*Total 400 MT/Month 20 Liters/Month 200 Nos./Month

Mode of Disposal

Collection, Storage in HWSA and send to Common TSDF site of M/s. SEPPL, for disposal.

Stores HWSA and finally sold to GPCB registered reprocessor.

Collection, Storage, Decontamination & given to GPCB authorized Vendor.

* Total quantity of solid/hazardous waste while CETP will be operating at peak capacity.


For TSDF Membership - Refer: Annexure-2.


--

D

i Solvent management (If any) Details of Solvent recovery (As per respective ToR)

Not Applicable.

ii VOC emission sources and its mitigation measures Not Applicable.

Technical presentation was made by the project proponent. CETP is proposed for power loom units and

yarn dyeing. Treated waste water from power loom units will be reused/ sold to the member units. Yarn

dyeing waste water is proposed to be discharged to the Ghoda Khadi. Committee asked PP not to

discharge treated waste water to Ghoda Khadi instead it shall also be reused. It is also mentioned by

PP that there is no underground discharge line to the surrounding natural drain. Aspects of waste water

intake to CETP, its treatment and handling of treated waste water discussed in depth. PP was asked to

submit CGWA permission for drawl of ground water.While discussing about the zero liquid discharge,

PP assured that they will provide state of the art treatment facilities for the proposed CETP and no

waste water will be discharged outside premises. After deliberation on various aspects, the terms of

reference proposed by the project proponent were accepted and the project proponent was asked to

include following additional TOR for the EIA study to be done covering 5 Km radius surrounding the

periphery of the project :

1. A tabular chart with index for point-wise compliance of below mentioned TORs.

2. NA permission letter for proposed site.

of 64


Page 32 of 64

3. Land Possession Documents of the proposed site.

4. Project sitespecific details such asdistance of the project site from the nearest (1) Village (2)

Water Body: Creek / Nallah / Lake / Pond / Reservoir / Canal (3) NationalHighway (4) State

Highway (5) Railwayline(6) Heritage site (7) NationalPark / Wild LifeSanctuary / Reserve Forest

shall beincluded. Give satellite image of 10 KM radius from the boundary of project premises.

5. Present land use pattern of the study area as well as the project area shall be given based on

satellite imagery.

6. Provision of separate entry, exit and continuous unobstructed open path within the

projectareafor unobstructed easy movement of the emergencyvehicle / firetenders without

reversing back. Mark the same in the layout.

7. Exact scope of the project should be given in detail. Need for the proposed CETP shall be

justified in detail.

8. Assessment of source of the water supply with adequacy of the same to meet with the

requirementsfor the proposed project. Permission from the concern authority for requirement of

the fresh water. Details of proposed ground water recharge scheme should also be submitted.

9. Characteristics of untreated and treated wastewater. A detailedeffluenttreat ability study vis-à-

vis the adequacy and efficacyof the treatment facilities proposedfor the wastewater tobe

generated along with adequacy and efficacy report. The characteristic on which treatability is

based shall also be stated.

10. Explore use of Best Available Technology (BAT) incorporating latest features for the proposed

CETP instead of providing conventional treatment units.

11. Details of the CETP units including its capacity, size of each unit, retentiontime and other

technical parameters.

12. Techno-feasibility & adequacy for reuse / recycle of treated effluent by member units.

Justifications of the economic viability of the treated effluent reuse / recycle. Details of the

scheme fortotal recycle-reuse of the treated effluent. Details regarding the percentage of waste

water to be reused / recycled by each member units.

13. Application wise break-up of treated effluentquantitytobe recycled / reused in various

applications and green beltdevelopmentetc. Details about availability of sufficient open land and

suitability for utilizing treated effluent for plantation / gardening. How it will be ensured that

treated effluent won't flow outside the premises linked with storm water during high rainy days.

14. Detailed layout of effluentconveyancepipelinewithin the Textile Park along with distances and all

technical specifications, line diagram and totalcapacity of the pipeline to convey effluent. Details

of pumping stations, pumping capacity in each pumping station etc if any shall also be

furnished.

15. List of the CETP members, their productioncapacity, effluent reuse / recycle capacity,

effluentgeneration capacity, effluent characteristics and effluent quantity. Whether any future

projections are envisagedfor finalization of the CETP capacity and conveyance pipeline.

16. Undertaking that no printing unit or process house shall be permitted as a member of the

proposed CETP.

17. Action plan for ‘Zero’ discharge of effluent (ZLD) shall be included. Notarized undertaking for

assuring that underground drainage connection will not be taken in the unit and there shall be

no effluent discharge outside the plant premises.

18. Economical and technical viability of the effluent treatment system to achieve Zero Liquid

of 64


Page 33 of 64

Discharge (ZLD).

19. Certification of adequacy of proposed ZLD scheme through credible institutes of National

repute.

20. Details about the proposedinlet norms of the CETP. Give details of the mandatorytreatment, if

any required by the member units to achieve the inlet norms by the each unit.

21. Specific monitoring plan to ascertain that all the CETP member units send their effluent

[contracted quantity] to the CETP and the effluent does not in any way find its way to other

sources i.e. measures to eliminate by passing of the effluent.

22. Details of the pipeline maintenance program to avoid choking / overflow / leakage of the effluent

conveyance pipeline and means to avoid the same.

23. Provision of flow meter at the outlet of the CETP; checks & balances to ensure that discharge

quality and quantity never exceeds the prescribed limit.

24. Details of the monitoring plan of the member units to ensure compliance with the inlet norms of

the CETP as well as to avoid shock loading in the system.

25. Justification / capacity of the project keeping in view the future effluent load from the additional

member units.

26. Details of CETP management and maintenance of the CETP during operation phase including

infrastructure, model of management, role of each stake holder, CETP effluent quality

monitoring scheme etc.

27. Impact of the CETP installation and treated effluent conveyance & disposal system on the

environment including the local hydrology, soil condition, floral and faunal bio-diversity of the

region and the mitigation measures proposed.

28. Surface water quality and ground water quality in the study area.

29. Geological features and geo-hydrological status of the study area.

30. Details of emergency storage of effluent in the CETP for the monsoon season.

31. Details of R&D to be initiated by the CETP management for effective and viable treatment of the

effluent received.

32. Details of total power load required for the CETP as well as details of dedicated power back up /

D.G.Sets to be provided to take care of power requirements during power supply failure, to

ensure that treatment units operate uninterrupted.

33. CETP managementmanualcoveringvarious management aspects during the effluent collection,

transportation, treatment and disposal aspects forbest management practices. The member

units shall abide by various clauses in this regard tocheck problems during the collection,

transportation, treatment and reuse / recycle / disposal of the effluent.

34. CETP managementmanualcoveringvarious management aspects during the effluent collection,

transportation, treatment and disposal aspects forbest management practices. The member

units shall abide by various clauses in this regard tocheck problems during the collection,

transportation, treatment and reuse / recycle / disposal of the effluent.

35. One season Site-specific micro-meteorological data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly

wind speed and directionand rainfall should be incorporated.

36. Anticipated environmental impacts due to the proposed project/production may be evaluated for

significance and based on corresponding likely impacts VECs (Valued Environmental

Components) may be identified. Baseline studies may be conducted within the study area of 5

km for all the concerned/identified VECs and likely impacts will have to be assessed for their

of 64


Page 34 of 64

magnitude in order to identify mitigation measures.

37. One complete season base line ambient air quality data (except monsoon) to be given along

with the dates of monitoring. The parameters to be covered shall be in accordance with the

revised National Ambient Air Quality Standards as well as project specific parameters. Locations

of the monitoring stations should be so decided so as to take into consideration the pre-

dominant downwind direction, population zone and sensitive receptors. There should be at least

one monitoring station in the upwind direction. There should be at least one monitoring station

in the pre dominant downwind direction at a location where maximum ground level

concentration is likely to occur.

38. Modeling indicating the likely impact on ambient air quality due to proposed activities. The

details of model used and input parameters used for modeling should be provided. The air

quality contours may be shown on location map clearly indicating the location of sensitive

receptors, if any, and the habitation. The wind rose showing pre-dominant wind direction should

also be indicated on the map. Impact due to vehicular movement shall also be included into the

prediction using suitable model. Results of Air dispersion modeling should be superimposed on

satellite image/ geographical area map.

39. Quantity of fuel required, its source and transportation. Fuel analysis to be provided (sulphur,

ash content and heavy metals including Pb, Cr, As and Hg). A confirmed fuel linkage should be

provided.

40. Specific details of (i) Details of the utilities required (ii) Flue gas emission ratefrom each utility

(iii) Air PollutionControl Measures proposedto each of the utility along with its adequacy.

41. Impact of the project on local infrastructure of the area such as on road network due to

transportation of fuel, ash etc. Whether any additional infrastructure would need to be

constructed and the agency responsible for the same with time frame.

42. Details of flora and fauna duly authenticated should be provided. In case of any scheduled

fauna, conservation plan should be provided.

43. Details of management of the hazardous wastes tobe generated from the project stating detail

of storageareafor each type of waste, its handling, its utilization and disposal etc. How the

manual handling of the hazardous wastes will be minimized.

44. Copy of membershipcertificate of Common Environmental Infrastructure like TSDF, if any taken,

should be incorporated.

45. Details of measures proposedfor the noise pollutionabatement and its monitoring. Provisions to

provide ear plugs / ear muffs to workers and to ensure its usage in high noise areas. Measures

to ensure that the noise from the looms remains less than 80 dB(A). Undertaking to carry out

Audiography of workers working near the looms, at least once in a year.

46. A detailed EMP including the protection and mitigation measures forimpact on human health

and environment as well as detailed monitoringplan and environmental

managementcellproposed for implementation and monitoring of EMP. The EMP should also

include the concept of waste-minimization, recycle/reuse/recover techniques, energy

conservation, and naturalresource conservation. Totalcapitalcost and recurring cost/annum

earmarkedforenvironmentpollutioncontrol measures.

47. Occupationalhealth impacts on the workers and mitigation measures proposedto avoid the

human health hazards along with the personalprotectiveequipment to be provided to the

workers. Provision of industrial hygienist and monitoring of the occupationalinjury to workers

of 64


Page 35 of 64

aswell as impact on the workers. Plan forperiodicmedical check up of the workers exposed.

Details of work zone ambient air qualitymonitoring plan as per Gujarat Factories Rules.

48. Risk assessment including prediction of the worst-case scenario and maximum credible

accident scenario related to fire and explosion issues due to storage and use of fuel should be

carried out. The worst-case scenario should take into account the maximum inventory of

storage at site at any point in time. The risk contours should be plotted on the plant layout map

clearly showing which of the activities would be affected in case of an accident taking place.

Based on the same, proposed safeguard measures including On-Site / Off-Site emergency plan

should be provided.

49. Measures to guard against fire hazards including details of automaticfiredetection and

controlsystem&detailed fire controlplan showing hydrantpipeline network, provision of DG Sets,

fire pumps, jockey pump, toxic gas detectors etc. should also be provided.

50. Provision to ensure sufficient water storage all the time for use during emergency situation.

51. Submit checklist in the form of Do’s & Don’ts of preventive maintenance, strengthening of HSE,

manufacturing utility staff for safety related measures.

52. Detailed five year greenbelt development program including annual budget, types &number of

trees to be planted, areaunder green belt development [with map], budgetary outlay; along with

commitment of the management to carry out the tree plantation activities outside the premises

at appropriate places in the nearby areas and elsewhere.

53. Proposal for socio-economic development activities including communitywelfare program most

useful in the projectareafor the overallimprovement of the environment. Submit a detailed plan

for social corporate responsibilities, with appropriate budgetary provisions for the next five years

and activities proposed to be carried out; specific to the current demographic status of the area.

54. A tabular chartfor the issues raised and addressed during public hearing/consultation and

commitment of the project proponent on the same should be provided. An action plan to

address the issues raised during public hearing and the necessary allocation of funds for the

same should be provided.

55. Plan forcompliance of CETP guidelinesissued by the CPCB.

56. Whether any litigationpending and / or any direction/ order passed by any Court of Law against

the company, if so, details thereof.

57. Details of schemefor surface aswell as roof top rain water harvesting and ground water recharge

with proper scientific calculations considering rainfall in the region, catchment area, land / soil

characteristics, ground water recharge rate, duration of rain water harvesting etc. Details of

provisions of pre-treatment of the rainwater in the case of surface run off are to be harvested.

Location of recharge percolation wells on the layout plan.

58. (a) Does the company have a well laid down Environment Policy approved by its Board of

Directors? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA report (b). Does the Environment Policy prescribe

for standard operating process / procedures to bring into focus any infringement / deviation /

violation of the environmental or forest norms / conditions? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA.

59. Disciplinary policy of CETP for member units.

60. What is the hierarchical system or administrative order of the company to deal with the

environmental issues and for ensuring compliance with the EC conditions? Details of this

system may be given.

61. Does the company have a system of reporting of non compliances / violations of environmental

of 64


Page 36 of 64

norms to the Board of Directors of the company and / or shareholders or stakeholders at large?

This reporting mechanism should be detailed in the EIA Report.

62. Certificate of accreditation issued by the NABET, QCI to the environmental consultant should be

incorporated in the EIA Report.

The above mentioned project specific TORs/additional TORs and the model TORs available in the

MoEF’s sector specific EIA Manual for CETP shall be considered as generic TORs for preparation of

the EIA report in addition to all the relevant information as per the generic structure of EIA given in

Appendix III in the EIA Notification, 2006. The draft EIA report shall be submitted to the Gujarat

PollutionControlBoardfor conducting the publicconsultationprocessasper the provisions of the EIA

Notification, 2006.



Validity of ToR:

• The ToRs prescribed for the project will be valid for a period of three years for

submission of EIA & EMP report accordingly, ToR will lapse after 18/10/2019.

• The period of validity could be extended for a maximum period of one year provided an

application is made by the applicant to the Regulatory Authority, at least three months

before the expiry of valid period together with an updated Form-I, based on proper

justification and also recommendation of the SEAC

7 SIA/GJ/IND2/20969/2017 M/s. Brichem Science Pvt Ltd

Plot no: 140, GIDC, Opp Paras Pharmaceuticals, Kalol, Gandhinagar-382721.

Screening & Scoping



• This is a Newof unit process manufacturing of synthetic organic chemicals as tabulated below: Sr. No.

Name Of Product CAS Number Quantity (Kg Per Month)

End User

1

Hydroxyprogesterone caproate(HPC) 630-56-8

750

Final Products Being Bulk

Drugs(API) will be Utilized By

Pharmaceutical Units For

Formulation

Nandrolone Decanoate 360-70-3

Nandrolone Phenylpropionate 62-90-8 Norethistrone 68-22-4

Norethistrone Acetate 51-98-9 Norethistrone Enanthate 3836-23-5

2

Estrone 53-16-7

350

Ethinyl Estradiol 57-63-6 Dydrogesterone 152-62-5

Estradiol Valerate 979-32-8 Estradiol 50-28-2

Levonorgestrel 17489-40-6 Lynestrenol 52-76-6

Desogestrel 54024-22-5

Allylestrenol 432-60-0 3 Testosterone 58-22-0 400

of 64


Page 37 of 64

Testosterone Decanoate 5721-91-5

Testosterone Propionate 57-85-2 Testosterone Phenylpropionate 1255-49-8

Testosterone Enanthate 315-37-7

Testosterone Undecanoate 5949-44-0

4

Progesterone 57-83-0

1000 Medroxyprogesterone Acetate 71-58-9 Medroxy Progesterone 520-85-4

5

Mifepristone 84371-65-3

200

Dehydroepiandrosterone 53-43-0 Boldenone Undecylenate 13103-34-9

Tibolone 5630-53-5 Oxandrolone 53-39-4

Danazole 17230-88-5 TOTAL 2700

• The project falls under category B of project activity 5(f) as per the schedule of the EIA

notification 2006.



Sr. no.

Particulars Details

A Water

i


GIDC,Kalol

Status of permission from the concern authority. -- ii Water consumption (KL/day)

Sr. No. Description Quantity (KL/day)

Water Consumption

1 Domestic 0.8 2 Gardening 1.4

3 Industrial

i Process 1.1 ii Washing 0.3

iii RO/DM Plant 1.5 IV Cooling make up 0.3

V Utility(Make of HWG) 0.5 TOTAL(3) 3.7

TOTAL(1+2+3) 5.9


Sr. No. Description Quantity (KL/day) Remark

Wastewater Generation

1 Domestic 0.6 To Septic Tank

2 Gardening 0.0 --

3 Industrial i Process 1.4 Industrial waste of

@ 2.1 KLD will be ii Washing 0.3

of 64


Page 38 of 64

iii RO/DM Plant 0.4 sent to common Spray Dryer after required Treatment.

IV Cooling make up 0.0

V Utility(Make of HWG)

0.0

TOTAL(3) 2.1

TOTAL(1+2+3) 2.7


Out of daily industrial wastewater, @ 2.1 KLD of

wastewater will be sent to Common Spray Dryer

after required treatment in our ETP, If required


Domestic: 0.6 KLD Industrial: 2.1 KLD

vi Reuse/Recycle details (KL/day) -- B Air


-

SR. no.

Source of emission

With Capacity


Name of the fuel


APCM Type of

emissions i.e.

Emission Standards

1 Hot water Generator

-- Electricity N.R. -- --

2 D.G.Set ( 65kVA)

9 Diesel - 15

Liter/Hr. N.R.

PM SO2

NOX

150 mg/Nm3 100 ppm 50 ppm

ii Process gas i.e. Type of pollutant gases (SO2, HCl, NH3, Cl2, NOx etc.)

No Process Gas Emission from proposed project

v Fugitive emission details with its mitigation measures. -- C Hazardous waste

(as per the Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules 2016.

i

Sr. no.

Type/Name of Hazardous waste


Category as per HW Rules.

Quantity Disposal Method

1 ETP Sludge ETP Plant

35.3 @ 300

Kg/Month

Collection, storage, transportation and disposal to authorized TSDF site.

2 Used oil Plant and Machinery 5.1

5 Liter/Month

Collection, storage, transportation and sold out to the registered Recyclers.

3 Distillation Residue

Process 36.1

0.3 MT/Month

Collection, storage, transportation and disposal to authorized CHWI facility.

4 Discarded containers / liners

Raw Material

33.1

15 No’s/month

(0.2 MT/Month)

Collection, storage and reused for disposal of waste / sold to recyclers.

5 Recovered solvent

Process 28.6

55.0 KL/Month

Collection, storage, transportation and sold out

of 64


Page 39 of 64

to the authorized Recyclers.

6 Process Sludge

Process 28.1

0.2 MT/Month

Collection, storage, transportation and disposal to authorized CHWI facility.

7 Spent Carbon

Process 28.3

0.5 MT/Month

Collection, storage, transportation and disposal to authorized TSDF facility.


We will obtain membership of Common Spray Dryer.


--

D


--

ii VOC emission sources and its mitigation measures --

PP made technical presentation before the committee. It is noted that for 2.7 MTPM of production waster consumption is 5.90 KLPD to be sourced from GIDC, Kalol. Waste water generation is 2.7 KLPD. Industrial waste of @ 2.1 KLD will be sent to common Spray Dryer after required Treatment. Domestic waste water is planned to dispose to soak pit. There is no process emission. It was discussed that for the treated waste water, it is to ensure that no volatile retain in the effluent meant for spray drying. Adequate measures for solvent handling and its loss prevention are discussed. Considering the above project details, after detailed discussion, the terms of reference (ToR) were










3. Permission for availability of fresh water from GIDC and membership certificate of common

facility for spray drying with booked capacity shall be submitted with EIA.







8 SIA/GJ/IND2/20875/2017 M/s. Bhavini Products Unit-II

Plot No. 1401/5, Phase-III, GIDC Vapi, Tal-Vapi, Dist. – Valsad– 396 195, Gujarat-India.

Screening & Scoping

Category of the Project: 5(f)

of 64


Page 40 of 64

Project Status: New


• This is aNew of unit process manufacturing of synthetic organic chemicals as tabulated below:

Sr. No.

Name of the Products CAS no. Quantity

MT/Month End-use of product

1. Mono chloro Phenol 106-48-9 50.00 Disinfectants, Water Treatment, Paper & Pulp, Paint and Adhesives

2. 2,4,6-Tri Chloro Phenol 88-06-2 75.00

3. Alcance Metazolone 26172-55-4/2682-20-4 50.00 4. Hydrogen Chloride (30%)

[By Product] 7647-01-0

48.25 Sale to actual user authorized by GPCB.


notification 2006.



Sr. No.

Particulars Details

A Water

i


GIDC water supply dept.

Status of permission from the concern authority. Permission is obtained.


Category Proposed KL/day

(J) Domestic 2.50 (K) Gardening 1.50

(L) Industrial Process 1.40

Washing 2.00

Boiler 0.00 Cooling 3.00

Scrubbing 4.00 Others 0.00

Total 14.40


Category Proposed KL/Day

Remarks

(G) Domestic 2.00 Disposal through septic tank

(H) Industrial - Process 0.90 To in-house ETP (to meet CETP inlet norms)

Washing 1.60 To in-house ETP (to meet CETP inlet norms)

Boiler 0.00 - Cooling 0.40 To in-house ETP (to meet CETP inlet norms)

Scrubbing 1.50 To in-house ETP (to meet CETP inlet norms) Others 0.00 -

Total Industrial waste water 3.00 To in-house ETP (to meet CETP inlet norms)

of 64


Page 41 of 64

Total 5.00 -


In-house ETP: 5 KL/day Max. capacity


Domestic: Adequate soak pit and septic tank. Industrial: Treated effluent in-house ETP will be disposed off through underground drainage to CETP, Vapi.

vi Reuse/Recycle details (KL/day) Ethyl Acetate will be recovered and reuse. : 0.16 KL/Day HCl will be recovered and sale to its registered users. :1.60 KL/Day

B Air

I Flue gas emission details No. of Boilers/TFH/Furnaces/DG sets etc. with capacities viz. TPH, Kcal/hr, MT/hr, KVA etc.

Sr. No.

Source of emission

With Capacity e.g.

Boiler (8 TPH)

Stack

Height

(meter)

Name of the fuel


APCM Type of emissions

i.e. Air Pollutants

Emission Standards

1. Thermopack (10 Lakh K. Cal/Hr)

11 Natural

Gas 125

SCM/Day

Adequate stack

height is provided

to chimney

PM SOX NOX

PM < 150

mg/Nm3

SO2 < 100

ppm

NOx < 50 ppm

2. D.G.Set (75 KVA)

9 Diesel 25 L/Hr PM SOX NOX

Ii Process gas i.e. Type of pollutant gases (SO2, HCl, NH3, Cl2, NOx etc.)

Sr. No.

Source of emission


APCM Type of emissions i.e. Air Pollutants

Emission Standards

1 Chlorination reactor

11 Wet Scrubber HCl Cl2

HCl < 20 mg/NM3 Cl2 < 9 mg/NM3

2 Process reactor

11 Scrubber CH3Cl -

v Fugitive emission details with its mitigation measures.No any fugitive emission from the proposed project.

C Hazardous waste (as per the Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules 2016.

i

Sr. No.



Category and Schedule as per HW Rules.

Quantity (MT/Annum)

Disposal Method

1. ETP Waste Effluent Treatment Plant

35.3 10 MT/Year Collection, Storage, Transportation, Disposal at TSDF.

of 64


Page 42 of 64

2. Discarded Drums & Containers

Raw materials

33.1 600Nos./Year Collection, Storage, Decontamination, Transportation, Disposal by selling to raw material suppliers.

3. Sludge From Wet Scrubber

Scrubber 37.1 0.01 MT/Year Collection, Storage, Transportation, Disposal at TSDF.

4. Distillation Residue

Process 36.1 138 MT/Year Collection, Storage, Transportation, Disposal at TSDF.

5. Used Oil Machinery 5.1 50 Lit/Year Collection, Storage, Sold out to registered recycler.

6. HCL (30%) from Scrubber

Mfg. Process

II,B15 579 MT/Year Collection, Storage and sale to actual users with GPCB authorization.

7. Spent solvent Mfg. process

26.4 50 MT/Year Collection, Storage and sale to actual users with GPCB authorization.

Quantity of all the wastes including discarded containers must be in MT/Annum.

Ii Membership details of CETP, TSDF, CHWIF, Common MEE etc.

Applied for Membership of VGEL, Vapi for utilizing the facility of CETP, Vapi.


-

D Solvent management (If any) Collection, Storage and sale to actual users with GPCB authorization.

i Details of Solvent recovery (As per respective ToR) - ii VOC emission sources and its mitigation measures -

Technical presentation was made by the project proponent. It is proposed to manufacture 175 MTPM of

synthetic organic chemicals. Water consumption is proposed to be 14.40 KLPD and waste water

generation is proposed to be 5 KLPD. Treated effluentafter treatment will be disposed off through

underground drainage to CETP, Vapi. Committee asked PP to go for zero liquid discharge. Process gas

emission of HCl, Cl2 and CH3Cl will take place and will be scrubbed in adequately designed scrubber. It

is also discussed to have solvent management plan for maximum recovery of the solvent and to

prevent losses of VOCs.






1. Adequate proposal for zero discharge by the project proponent with techno-economical

feasibility for zero liquid discharge





of 64


Page 43 of 64








9 SIA/GJ/IND2/18942/2017 M/S. SHREE HARI FINE CHEM Shed No C1- 240, Phase-II, GIDC, Vatva, Ahmedabad, Gujarat-382 445

Appraisal

Project / Activity No.: 5(f)

Project status: New

• PP has submitted online application vide no. SIA/GJ/IND2/18942/2017 dated 26/10/2017 for

obtaining Environmental Clearance.

• The SEAC had recommended TOR to SEIAA and SEIAA issued TOR to PP vide letter dated

30/04/2017.

• Project proponent has submitted EIA Report prepared by M/s: Green Circle Inc., Vadodara

based on the TOR issued by SEIAA

• This is an existing unit engaged in Synthetic organic chemicals and now proposes for expansion

as tabulated below:

Sr. No.

Name of Product MT/ Month

CI Number End use of the product

1 3-Chloro-2-Hydroxy Propane Sulphonic Acid Sodium Salt

16 143218-48-8 All are as a raw material of Electroplating 2 Pyridinium Propyl Sulphobetaine 3 15471-17-7

3 Bis Sodium Sulphopropyl Disulphide 2 27206-35-5.

4 Sodium 3-Mercaptopropane Sulphonate 0.5 17636-10-1 5 Dimethyl Dithio Carbamyl Propane

Sulphonic Acid Sodium Salt 0.5 18880-36-9

6 3-Benzothiozolyl-2-Mercapto Propane Sulphonic Acid Sodium Salt

0.5 49625-94-7

7 Morpholine Propane Sulfonic Acid and its derivatives

0.5 1132-61-2

8 3-Cyclohexylamino Propane Sulfonic Acid and allied derivatives

0.5 1135-40-6

9 Oxathiolane, 2,2 – Dioxide 7 1120-71-4

10 Pyridine – 3 – Sulfonic Acid 0.5 636-73-7

11 Benzene 1,3 – Disulfonic Acid Disodium Salt.

0.5 831-59-4

Total 31.5

• The project falls under Category B1 of project activity 5(f)as per the schedule of EIA Notification

2006

• PP was called for presentation in the SEAC meeting dated 17/01/2018.

• During the meeting dated 17/01/2018, technical presentation made during the meeting by

of 64


Page 44 of 64

project proponent.

• During the meeting, the project was appraised based on the information furnished in the EIA

Report and details presented before the committee.

• The baseline environmental quality has been assessed for various components of the

environment viz. air, noise, water, biological and socioeconomic aspect. The baseline

environmental study has been conducted for the study area of 5 km radial distance from project

site for the period March 2017 to May 2017. Ambient Air Quality monitoring was carried out for

PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx, HCl and VOC at Six locations, including the project site. Values

conform to the prescribed standards for Ambient Air Quality. The incremental Ground Level

Concentration (GLC) has been computed using ISCST – 3 model. The resultant concentrations

are within the NAAQS. The modelling study proved that the air emissions from the proposed

plant would not affect the ambient air quality of the region in any significant manner. The

ambient air quality around the proposed project site will remain within the National Ambient Air

Quality Standards (NAAQS).

• Salient features of the project are as under:

Sr. no.

Particulars Details

A Water i

Source of Water Supply1 (GIDC, Bore well, Surface water etc...)

GIDC shall supply water

Status of permission from the concern authority. ii Water consumption (KL/day):5.0

Category Proposed

KL/Day (M) Domestic 1.2

(N) Gardening 0.3 (O) Industrial

Process 1.6

Boiler 1.0 Cooling 0.5

Others (Washing and makeup for scrubbing) 0.4 Total 5.0


- Category Proposed

KL/Day (I) Domestic 1.000

(J) Gardening 0.000 (K) Industrial

Process 1.160 Boiler 0.100

Cooling 0.050

Others (Washing and makeup for scrubbing) 0.400 Total Industrial waste water 1.710


ETP is proposed with capacity of 2.0 KLD. CETP Vatva, Ahmedabad facility for disposal of diluted stream @ 1.230 KLD. MEE Vatva, Ahmedabad facility for disposal of

of 64


Page 45 of 64

concentrated effluent @ 0.480 KLD. Novel, Vatva facility for disposal of spent acid @ 1.5 MT/Month


Domestic: Soak pit Industrial: Diluted Stream: CETP Vatva Concentrated Stream: MEE,Vatva

vi Reuse/Recycle details (KL/day) -

B Air I Flue gas emission details

No. of Boilers/TFH/Furnaces/DG sets etc. with capacities viz. TPH, Kcal/hr, MT/hr, KVA etc.

-

SR.

no.

Source of emission

With Capacity

e.g. Boiler (8

TPH)

Stack Height (meter

)

Name of the fuel



s

APCM Emission Standard

1.

Steam Boiler

12 Wooden Waste / White Coal/ Imported Coal

1.00 MT/Day

SO2, NO2, PM

Dust Collector

PM<150 mg/Nm3 SO2 < 100 ppm NOx< 50 ppm

2.

D.G. Set (6.5 KVA) (Stand by)

5 Diesel 7 Lit/hr SO2, NO2, PM

- PM<150 mg/Nm3 SO2 < 100 ppm NOx< 50ppm

- ii Process gas i.e. Type of pollutant gases (SO2, HCl,

NH3, Cl2, NOx etc.)

-

Sr. No.

Stack Attached

to

Stack Height

(m)

APCM System

Expected Pollutant Pollutants

1.

Reactor 12

Scrubbed under Vacuum through Water and Alkali Solution by Vacuum Pump.

SO2

HCl SO2<40 mg/Nm3 HCl<20 mg/Nm3

v Fugitive emission details with its mitigation measures.

• Fugitive emission will due to the leakages in pump, storage container, material transferring, and packing.

Mitigation measures:

• Proper storage of raw materials, products and fuels

• Ensuring closed feeding and sampling.

• Establishing SOPs for start-up, shut down and maintenance operational procedure

Regular work place and ambient air quality monitoring will be done.


I

of 64


Page 46 of 64

Sr. No.

Types of Waste Category Quantity Mode of Disposal

1. Hazardous

WasteETP Sludge 34.3

12.0 MT/Annum

Storage and disposal to TSDF site.

2. Calcium Sulphate 34.3 14.4

MT/Annum Storage and disposal to TSDF site.

3. Boiler Ash - 6.0

MT/Annum Storage and disposal to TSDF site.

4 Used Oil/ Spent

Oil 5.1

40 Lit/Year

Sold to Recycler, Reprocessor or used as Lubricants for Machineries.

5.

Discarded Container / Drum

33.3

3 MT/Annum

2 MT/Annum

Send back to raw material supplier / sold to registered recycler

Bags Sold to Registered Recycler

Quantity of discarded containers must be in MT/Month.


CETP for discharge of treated waste waterMEE for concentrated stream

ii Details of Non-Hazardous waste & its disposal(MSW and others)

AMC collection centre

D i Solvent management (If any)

Details of Solvent recovery (As per respective ToR)

NA

ii VOC emission sources and its mitigation measures

VOC source:

• Liquid material storage area

• Production area VOC mitigation measures

• Store VOC-containing products in air-tight containers.

• Buy products with less packaging as the printing of packaging materials generates VOCs

• Will assign a person develop and implement the VOC reduction plan.

• Utilizing natural ventilation Maintaining the good housekeeping practice

The projectproponent along with their experts/consultants attended the meeting of the SEAC held on

17/01/2018.During the meeting, the project was appraised based on the information furnished in the

EIA Report. Technical presentation made during the meeting by project proponent.EIA report reveals

that baseline environmental study was carried out during the month of March 2017 to May 2017 to

determine the prevailing status of ambient air, land use, noise level topography, meteorology, ecology &

socioeconomic outline.Baseline ambient air quality was measured at nine locations. Monitoring was

carried out for PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx and VOC within 10 km radius from the project site.The

maximum concentrations of PM10, PM2.5, SO2 and NOx at each ambient air monitoring locations were

compared with NAAQS for industrial, residential, rural and other areas.Concentration of PM10 ranged

from 42.60 µg/m3 to 72.60 µg/m3. Concentration of PM2.5 recorded from minimum 32.5 µg/m3 to

maximum 49.20 µg/m3. Concentration of SO2 recorded ranged from minimum 4.2 2µg/m3 to maximum

42.2µg/m3.Concentration of NO2recorded ranged from minimum 12.2µg/m3 to maximum 39.50

of 64


Page 47 of 64

µg/m3.The value of VOC ranged from 0.10µg/m3 to 0.3 µg/m3.The Value of HCL ranged from 1.2

µg/m3 to 40.2 µg/m3.The incremental Ground Level Concentration (GLC) has been computed using

ISC-AERMOD View”.The maximum 24-hourly average ground level concentration for pollutant due to

proposed project calculated using mathematical model (ISCST3) for PM10, SO2, NOx and resultant

values also meets with NAAQ standards. For ground water qualities in terms of various essential and

desirable characteristics are found within the limits specified by IS 10500:2012.Total water requirement

of the project for domestic & Industrial activity during operation phase will be 5.0 KLD. Water

requirement for the industrial purpose will be 4.0 KLD, for the domestic purpose will be 1.2 KLD and 0.3

KLD for green belt. Main source of water supply is GIDC Estate.Waste water generated from domestic

activities (1.0 KLD) and industrial activity (1.71 KLD). Total waste water will be 2.71KLD, which will be

treated in ETP. ETP is proposed with capacity of 2.0 KLD. Dilute stream of waste water is proposed to

be discharged to CETP and concentrated waste water stream is proposed to be sent to common MEE.

Committee asked PP to send entire quantity of treated waste water to common spray drier keeping

direction under section 18(1) B of CPCB in view.Spent acid is proposed to be sent to Novel, Vatva.

Scrubber is proposed by the unit with reaction vessel for scrubbing process gas emission of HCl and

SO2.After deliberation, it was unanimously decided to consider the project for further consideration only

after submission of the following:

1. Revised details of entire quantity of treated waste water to be sent to common spray drier

with membership facility showing quantity of treated waste water to be hand over to

common spray drier.

2. Revised hazardous waste details incorporating spent sulfuric acid and bleed liquor

(Exhausted scrubbing Media in the form of spent HCl) details with its handling and disposal

management plan.

10 SIA/GJ/IND/2682/2017 M/s. Haq Steels Pvt. Ltd. Plot No. 1, 2, 3 of Survey no. 1359 & 1360, Viramgam Co-Operative Industrial Estate Ltd., Opp. Balapir Dargah, Taluka: Viramgam, District: Ahmedabad.

Appraisal

Project / Activity No.: 3(a)

Project status: Expansion

• PP has submitted online application vide no. SIA/GJ/IND/2682/2017dated 26/10/2017 for


• The SEAC had recommended TOR to SEIAA vide letter dated 29/02/2016 and SEIAA issued

TOR to PP vide letter dated 29/02/2016.

• Project proponent has submitted EIA Report prepared by M/s: San Envirotech Pvt. Ltd.,

Ahmedabad based on the TOR issued by SEIAA

• Public Hearing was conducted by Gujarat Pollution Control Board on 02/08/2017 at project site

of M/s:Haq Steels Pvt Ltd, Plot No:Plot No. 1, 2, 3 of Survey no. 1359 & 1360, Viramgam Co-

Operative Industrial Estate Ltd., Opp. Balapir Dargah, Taluka: Viramgam, District: Ahmedabad.

• This is an existing unit engaged in Synthetic organic chemicals and now proposes for expansion

as tabulated below:

of 64


Page 48 of 64

Sr. No.

Name of the Products CAS no. QuantityMT/Month End-use of product Existing Proposed Total

01 MS TMT Bars -- 2400 7600 10000 Infrastructure Industries

Total 2400 7600 10000

• The project falls under Category B1 of project activity 3(a)as per the schedule of EIA Notification

2006


• Salient features of the project are as under::

Sr. no.

Particulars Details

A Total cost of proposed project (Rs. in Crores):

Existing: 20 crore Proposed:1.5 crore Total: 21.5crore

(1) Capital cost for EMS (Environmental Management System): 0.34 Crores (2) Recurring cost towards the environmental protection measures: 0.47 Crores per Annum.

B Total plot area (sq. meter)

Existing: 19600 m2 Proposed:9512 m2 Total: 29112 m2

Green belt area,/ Tree plantation area (sq. meter)

Existing: 7530 m2 Proposed:2022 m2 Total: 9552 m2

C Employment generation

1. Direct Existing:40 Proposed:55 Total:95

2. Indirect Existing: Proposed: Total:

D Water

i

Source of Water Supply (GIDC Bore well, Surface water etc...)

Bore well

Status of permission from the concern authority.


Existing KL/day

Proposed (Additional) KL/day

Total after Expansion KL/day

Remarks

(P) Domestic 3.0 5.0 8.0

(Q) Gardening 10.0 5.0 15.0

(R) Industrial Process -- -- --

Washing -- -- -- Boiler -- -- --

Cooling 10.0 25.0 +10.0* 45.0 +10.0* * Condensate recycle

Water treatment -- 10.0 10.0 Total (A+B+C) 23.0 55.0 78.0


of 64


Page 49 of 64


Proposed (Additional) KL/day

Total after Expansion KL/day

Remarks

(L) Domestic 2.4 4.6 7.0 (M) Industrial

Process -- -- --

Washing -- -- -- Boiler -- -- --

Cooling 0.0 10.0 10.0 Water treatment

Total Industrial waste water 0.0 1.0 1.0 Total (A+B) 2.4 15.6 18.0


ETP: 25 KLD Evaporator: 0.25 KL/hr


Domestic: Soak pit

Industrial: Effluent from utility i.e. cooling bleed off and reject from water treatment will be taken to ETP followed by evaporator. Hence unit will achieve zero liquid discharge.

vi Reuse/Recycle details (KL/day) Nil

vii Details of rain water harvesting The storm water from the building roofs will be directed through the drainage to the covered storm water drainage line. All drainage system will be concreted lined and located along the roads up to rain water harvesting pit. Roof top rain water will be collected in tanks and reused after filtration as per requirements.

E Air [Existing & Proposed]


Existing:Induction furnace-10 TPH Proposed:Induction Furnace-10 TPH + Reheating furnace-12.5 Lakhs Kcal/hr.

-

Sr. no.

Source of emission

With Capacity


Name of the fuel


Type of emissions i.e. Air Pollutants


Existing

1. Induction Furnace (10 TPH)

30 Electricity -- PM<150 mg/NM3

SO2<40 mg/NM3

NOx<25 mg/NM3

Primary & secondary flame extraction system and Bag house

2. Induction Furnace (10 TPH) (Stand by)**

3. D.G. Set (600 kVA)

11 Diesel 100 lit/hr PM<150 mg/NM3

SO2<100 ppm NOx<50 ppm

--

Proposed

1. Reheating furnace (12.5 Lakhs Kcal/hr)

30 Coal/ briquette

10 MT/day

PM<150 mg/NM3

SO2<100 ppm NOx<50 ppm

Cyclone followed by bag filter

**Note:Second induction furnace is standby in existing unit, which will be utilized after

of 64


Page 50 of 64

expansion.

ii Process gas i.e. Type of pollutant gases (SO2, HCl, NH3, Cl2, NOx etc.) [Existing & Proposed]

-

Sr. no.

Source of emission

Type of emission


APCM

NAAQS (National

Ambient Air Quality

Standards)

No process gas emission

-

v Fugitive emission details with its mitigation measures. [Existing & Proposed]

To control the fugitive emissions generated during various operations in the industry, unit will adopt following mitigation measures.

• Fugitive emission from material unloading operations, material transfer points will be reduced by top & side suction hood.

• Dust suppression system will be provided.

• Green cover will be created at all the available open spaces.

F Hazardous waste (as per the Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules 2016. [Existing & Proposed]

i Sr. no.



Category and Schedule as per HW Rules

Quantity (MT/Annum)

Disposal Method

Existing Total after expansion

Hazardous waste

1 ETP sludge &Evaporation salt

ETP and evaporator

35.3 -- 3 MT/month

Collection, Storage, transportation and disposal by landfilling to approved TSDF Site.

2 Used oil Machineries and D.G.

set

5.1 0.5 kl/yr. 0.5 kl/yr. Collection, storage, and use as lubricant in plant machinery or sale to registered recycler.



Still not obtained, Before start the operation, unit will obtained the required membership.

iii Details of Non-Hazardous waste & its disposal (MSW and others)

1) Process slag Existing: 35 MT/month After expansion: 135 MT/month Collection, Storage and used in road making/dump at low lying area.

2) Dust from bag filter Existing: 1 MT/month After expansion: 4 MT/month Collection, Storage, transportation and sell to brick manufacturers.

G Solvent management (If any)

i Details of Solvent recovery (As per No use of any solvent.

of 64


Page 51 of 64

respective ToR)

ii VOC emission sources and its mitigation

measures

No sources of VOC emission


17/01/2018. During the meeting, the project was appraised based on the information furnished in the

EIA Report, details presented before the committee and various issues raised during the public hearing.

Committee noted that all the issued raised during the public hearing are satisfactorily

addressed.Technical presentation made during the meeting by project proponent.EIA report reveals

that baseline environmental study was carried out during the month of March 2016 to May 2016 to

determine the prevailing status of ambient air, land use, noise level topography, meteorology, ecology &

socioeconomic outline.Baseline ambient air quality was measured at six locations.Monitoring was

carried out for PM10, PM2.5, SO2,NOx, CO,HC VOC within 10 km radius from the project site. The


compared with NAAQS for industrial, residential, rural and other areas. An average and 98th percentile

value of 24-hourly PM10 values at all thelocations varied between 60.2-64.7 µg/m3 and 67.0-72.6

µg/m3 , whichare within the stipulated standard of CPCB, 100 µg/m3.An average and 98th percentile

value of 24-hourly PM2.5 values at all thelocations varied between 33.2-37.2 µg/m3 and 36.5-42.5

µg/m3 , whichare within the stipulated standard of CPCB, 60 µg/m3 .An average and 98th percentile

value of 24-hourly SO2 value of arithmeticmean at all the locations ranged between 12.6-20.6 µg/m3

and 16.0-26.3µg/m3 respectively, which are well within the stipulated standards of 80µg/m3 .An

average and 98th percentile value of 24 hourly NOx value of arithmeticmean at all the locations ranged

between 17.2-23.7 µg/m3 and 20.4-28.3µg/m3 respectively, which are much lower than the standards

stipulatedby CPCB, i.e. 80 µg/m3 .Ground water samples from villages meet the permissiblelimit set by

the authority (BIS).The hourly Leq noise levels recorded at various locations in the study area show

considerable fluctuations because of changes in traffic movement, commercial and domestic activities

in the study area. In the study area higher Noise value during day time was noted at project site, but it is

lessthan the Ambient standards of Industrial area for day time {75 dB (A)}and highest results in night

time was also recorded at project site, whichis also less than the prescribed limit of Industrial area for

night time {70dB (A)}.The modeling study proved that, the air emissions from the proposedplant would

not likely to cause any significant impact on the ambient airquality of the study area. Committee

observed that PP has proposed Cyclone followed by Bag filter for proposed coal fired reheating furnace

of 12.5LacKcal/hr. Unit has provided primary and secondary flame extraction system and bag house to

the existing two induction furnace.Unit has no process gas emission source. Dust separation system

will be provided to control fugitive emission. Total fuel requirement of Coal/briquette10 Mt/day and

Diesel of 100 Lit/Hr. Total water consumption for proposed project will be 78 KLD which will be sourced

from Bore well. Total industrial wastewater generation will be 11 KLD which will be treated in proposed

ETP. Thus, unit will maintain zero liquid discharge. Additional demand of water will be procured from

the existing bore well. Generated domestic wastewater of 7 KLD will be collected and treated with the

effluent treatment plant. The treated wastewater will be Evaporator and condensate of 10 KLD will be

recycled in Cooling tower.

of 64


Page 52 of 64

After deliberation, it was unanimously decided to recommend the project for grant of EC to SEIAA with

following conditions:

1. Unit shall have to undertake third party safety audit on regular basis as per the prevailing

rules/laws.

2. Project proponent shall comply all the conditions mentioned in “The Companies (Corporate

Social Responsibility Policy) Rules, 2014 and its amendments from time to time vide notification

of ministry of corporate affairs dated 27th February, 2014 in a letter and spirit.

11 SIA/GJ/MIS/20514/2017 Om Sai Navigations Pvt. Ltd. Port Victor near Village: Victor, Taluka: Rajula, District: Amreli, Gujarat

Appraisal

Project / Activity No.: 7(e)

Project status: New

• PP has submitted online application vide no. SIA/GJ/MIS/20514/2017 dated 26/10/2017 for


• The SEAC had issued TOR to PP in the SEAC meeting dated 14/06/2016.

• Project proponent has submitted EIA Report prepared by M/s: Eco Chem Sales & Services,

Surat based on the TOR issued by SEIAA


of M/s: Om Sai Navigations Pvt. Ltd., Port Victor near Village: Victor, Taluka: Rajula, District:

Amreli, Gujarat.

• This is a new unit proposes a greenfield project as tabulated below:

Sr. No.

Name of the Products CAS no. Quantity

MT/Annum End-use of

product

1 Dry Bulk,Break bulk and Offshoresupport

-- 3.0 MT/Annum

2 Ro-Ro andcontainer -- 1.5 MT/Annum

• The project falls under Category B1 of project activity 7(e)as per the schedule of EIA Notification

2006



Sr. no.

Particulars Details

A Water

i


Source: Private Tanker

Status of permission from the concern authority. Not Applicable


Category Existing KL/day

(S) Domestic 07 (T) Gardening 10

(U) Industrial --

of 64


Page 53 of 64

Process - Washing -

Boiler - Cooling -

Others -


-


Remarks

(N) Domestic 05 Treated in septic tank/soak pit system

(O) Industrial -- Process

Washing Boiler

Cooling Others

Total Industrial waste water

00 Only domestic sewage

-


Not Applicable


Domestic: septic tank/soak pit system Industrial: Not Applicable

vi Reuse/Recycle details (KL/day) B Air


No Flue gas emission except D.G.Set, which will be used in case of power failure

-

SR.

no.

Source of emission

With Capacity

e.g. Boiler


Name of the fuel



s


1 D.G.Set -2 nos.(600 kVA)

11 meter

HSD 130-150

L/h PM, SO2

NOx

Adequate stack height

PM :<150 mg/Nm3

SO2:<100 ppm NOx :< 50 ppm

-

ii Process gas i.e. Type of pollutant gases (SO2, HCl, NH3, Cl2, NOx etc.)

Not Applicable As no process gas emission

-

Sr. no.

Source of emission

Type of emission



Not Applicable

- v Fugitive emission details with its mitigation measures. C Hazardous waste

(as per the Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules 2016.

i

of 64


Page 54 of 64

Sr. no.


waste


Category and Schedule as

per HW Rules.

Quantity (MT/Annum)

Disposal Method

1 Used Oil D.G. Set Sch:I, 5.1 0.96

MT/Annum Sold to registered

refiners.

2 Discarded

Container

Empty containers of used oil

Sch I: 33.1 1.2

MT/Annum

Sold to GPCB approved scrap

dealer. Quantity of discarded containers must be in MT/Annum.


Not Applicable


Not Applicable

D


Not Applicable

ii VOC emission sources and its mitigation measures Not Applicable

The project proponent along with their experts/consultants attended the meeting of the SEAC held on

17/01/2018.During the meeting, the project was appraised based on the information furnished in the


Technical presentation made during the meeting by project proponent. EIA report reveals that baseline

environmental study was carried out during the month of Oct - 2016 to Dec 2016 to determine the

prevailing status of ambient air, land use, noise level topography, meteorology, ecology

&socioeconomic outline. Baseline ambient air quality was measured at eight locations. Monitoring was

carried out for PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx, CO and VOC within 10 km radius from the project site. The


compared with NAAQS for industrial, residential, rural and other areas.During the study PM2.5 was

observed in the range of 20-45.3 µg/m3. Maximum concentration ofPM2.5 was found at Victor Village.

All the results of PM2.5 were found well within the standardlimit.was observed in the range of 55.1–91.6

µg/m3. Maximum concentration of PM10 wasfound at Victor Village. All the results of PM10 were found

well within the standard limit.SO2 concentration was observed in the range of 6.0-14.0 µg/m3, which

is well within the standardlimit.NOx concentration in Ambient Air quality was in the range of 8.6 –20

µg/m3, which is well withinthe standard limit.Result of CO was found well within the standard limit.Total

VOC (as isobutylene) survey was also carried out for all the locations and it was found below the

detection limit i.e. < 1 ppm.Based on test results, it is concluded that the ambient air quality of the

studied locations is within NAAQ 2009.Committee observed that PP has only required D.G. Set of two

numbers only. Total fuel requirement of Diesel 150lit/day. Total water consumption for proposed project

will be 17 KLD which will be sourced from Private Tanker. Total industrial wastewater generation will be

NIL. Generated domestic wastewater of 5 KLD will be collected and disposed off through septic

tank/soak pit system. For the flora and fauna after the study, it is concluded that Spatial extent and

distribution of vegetation types can be linked to the human induced changes and biodiversity

characterization. None of the sighted animal species can be assigned endemic species category of the

study area. Some of the animal observed in the study area is protected under schedule I and II have to

of 64


Page 55 of 64

be protected and not disturbed at all, for the same, the conservation plan should be implemented for

entire life of the project as per suggestions in conservation and from forest officials. The monitoring of

the same should be complied half yearly basis.

Regarding HD model, based on the modeling studies carried out to evaluate the impacts on the flow

regime and sedimentation processes due to the proposed enhanced marine development facilities for

Victor Port at Victor, Amreli, the conclusions have been drawn which are 1. From the flow modeling

studies it is concluded that there is no impact on flow regime except for small variation noticed at some

localized areas where reclamation / dredging has taken place and at the jetty and channel location

(where development activities are undertaken). 2. There is no change in the flow regime in general in

the rest of the domain. The changes observed in the flow regime are mainly local as seen from the

figures and do not have an impact on the domain flow regime. Since the changes in the bed level is not

very significant, no mitigation measures are required. 3.It can be concluded from hydrodynamic model

studies that the proposed activities does not have any significant impact to the shoreline abutting the

project as well as no significant impact on the ecologically sensitive areas along the river stretch. 4.tt

can be concluded from HD studies that there will not be any impact on creek system due to the

proposed marine developments. From the flow modeling studies, it can be concluded that there will not

be significant changes in the flow regime due to the proposed developments.

Hence, changes in the sediment processes do not have any impact on shoreline. Shore protection

measures are not required as the flow characteristics is based on tidal flow phenomena and the

hydraulic conditions are not modified by the proposed activities this will not have any impact on the

shoreline morphology

Regarding ST Model, the changes in the rate of instantaneous erosion also predicted after proposed

development is not significant and also it is limited to localized areas only. From the results, it can be

observed that the bed level rises slightly in the channel route and estimated to be of 0.03 m per month.

The changes in the rate of instantaneous deposition predicted after proposed development is not

significant and also it is limited to localized areas only. The bed level changes are confined to the areas

where development is taken place (i.e. in the channel and the area where dredging has been carried

out). From the model outputs, it can be inferred that the variation or change in the bed level for the

proposed developments is in the range of 0.02 -0.04 m per month and the total annual dredging

maintenance quantity estimated as 1.8 mm3.

Dredge disposal studies is carried out and according to study, The estimated quantity of dredged

material to be disposed is about 1.8 million m3 and is proposed to be disposed in open water at the

identified disposal location ”DP” within 1 km radius in a predetermined sequential manner through direct

disposal method (hopper dredger). It is assumed that the capacity of the Trailer Suction Hopper

Dredger (TSHD) used for dredge disposal will be 4000 m3. Dredge disposal modeling studies were

carried out for 4 months with continuous disposal of dredged material at and around 1 km radius of

selected location i.e. “DP” predicted the sediment plume dispersion and bed level changes at various

of 64


Page 56 of 64

time levels. Whereas, in DP the sediment plume moves towards north-eastern and southwestern side

and not reaching to the northern coast. The maximum sediment concentration levels vary in between

2900 mg/l to 3430 mg/l during disposal time at dump location. It is concluded from the model results

that the disposed material will not be back to dredged channel and also concluded that sediment

concentration levels come down to attain the ambient values (180-200 mg/l) within 5 days after

stopping the disposal of dredged material. It can be concluded that the bed level change is limited to

around 3.0 km either side of North East & South West direction from the dumping site. The bed level

variation over the period of 4 months dumping is of the order of 0.466 m. The bed level has not

increased than 0.466 m at any point of time after 4 months of dumping and it would be much less by

spreading the dumping disposal point judiciously within the dump location so that there will be no

chance of the dump material forming a hump in the region. After 4 months of disposal of dredged

material, it can be concluded that no changes has been observed in the coastal morphology due to the

disposal of dredged material

After technical presentation, complaints received through email and issued raised during public hearing

were discussed and accordingly it was decided to consider the project for further consideration only

after submission of the following

1. Detailed action points for compliance of the compliant received by the SEAC through email and

letters (Contents of letter were discussed during presentation before the project proponents).

2. Current status of action points for the issued raised during public hearing.

3. NOC from the forest department through office of Chief Wild Life Warden

4. Detailed outlay for the budget for the subsequent five years regarding CSR and EMP with

recurring cost.

12 SIA/GJ/IND2/20476/2017 M/s. Parul Chemicals Survey no 63/A, Part-I, Panchdevla, Vadodara Gujarat.


Project / Activity No.: 5(f)

Project status: New

• PP has submitted online application vide no. SIA/GJ/IND2/20476/2017dated 26/10/2017 for


• The SEAC had recommended TOR to SEIAA and SEIAA issued TOR to PP vide letter dated

24/04/2017.

• Project proponent has submitted EIA Report prepared by M/s: Jyoti Om Chemical Research

Centre Pvt Ltd., Ankleshwar based on the TOR issued by SEIAA.


of M/s:Parul Chemicals, Plot No:Survey no 63/A, Part-I, Panchdevla, Vadodara, Gujarat.

• This is a new unit proposes for Synthetic organic chemicals as tabulated below:

Sr. No.

Name of the Products CAS no. Quantity MT/Month

End-use of product

1. Organic -- 1000

of 64


Page 57 of 64

Easters/Plasticizers

Group A

Phthalate base Plasticizers

-- Any of product – Either / Or will be manufacture d with upper limit 1000 MT/Month.

A1 Dimethyl Phthalate 131-11-3 Cellulose esterplastics, such asphotographicfilms and sheets, blister packaging and tapeapplications etc.

A2 Diethyl Phthalate 84-66-2 Plasticizer in consumer products, includingplastic packaging films, cosmetic formulations,and in incense stick (agarbatti) manufacturingunits, etc.

A3 Di butyl Phthalate /Di IsobutylPhthalate

84-69-5 Plasticiser in PVC that is used to make, film,sheeting, coated products, flooring, roofing, wallcoverings, hoses, tubing, wires, cables, injectionmoulded shoe soles, car undercoating andsealants. Non-PVC uses are in adhesives,sealants, paints, printing inks, lubricants, nail polish, and perfumes, etc.

A4 Di Octyl Phthalate/ Di Iso OctylPhthalate

27554-26-3 Used in processing polyvinyl choride and ethylcellulose resins to produce plastic film, imitationleather, electric wire, cable wearer, sheet, planet, mould plasticproducts and Used innitrocellulose paints

A5 Di Iso Nonyl Phthalate 28553-12-0 Used as plasticiser in PVC applications.

A6 Di Iso Decyl Phthalate 26761-40-0 Used as plasticizer in the production of cablecompounding.

Group B

Tri Mallitate base Plasticizers

--

B1 Tri Octyl Tri Mellitate (TOTM)

3319-31-1 Used for PVC applications in which the end-userequires extreme low volatility like mouldedparts, dishwasher gaskets, seals, and telephone wire.

B2 Tri-Isodecyl-Trimellitate (TIDTM)

36631-30-8 Used as PVC plasticizer and synthetic lubricantbase-fluid.

Group C

Adipate Base Plastcizers --

C1 Dioctyl adipate (DOA/DIOA)

103-23-1 To produce clear films to food packaging and PVC formulation / cosmetics.

C2 Di Iso Decyl Adipate (DIDA)

27178-16-01

Primary plasticizer for Plastics, Films, sheets,leathers, tile, etc.

Total -- 1000

• The project falls under Category B1 of project activity 5(f)as per the schedule of EIA Notification

of 64


Page 58 of 64

2006



Sr. no.

Particulars Details

A Water i


Surface water

Status of permission from the concern authority. ii Water consumption (KL/day)

KL/day (V) Domestic 2

(W) Gardening 3 (X) Industrial 13

Process 8 Washing 1

Boiler --

Cooling 4 Others --


- Category KL/Day Remarks

(P) Domestic 1.5 (Q) Industrial 14

Process 12 Washing 1

Boiler --

Cooling 1 Others

Total Industrial waste water 15.5 -

Iv Treatment facility with capacity (ETP, CETP, MEE, STP etc).

ETP : 14 KLD


Domestic: Soak pit

Industrial: ZLD vi Reuse/Recycle details (KL/day) 12.3 KLD

B Air i Flue gas emission details

No. of Boilers/TFH/Furnaces/DG sets etc. with capacities viz. TPH, Kcal/hr, MT/hr, KVA etc.

Thermopack and DG Set

-

SR. no.

Source of emission

With Capacity e.g. Boiler (8

TPH)


Name of the fuel


Type of emissions

i.e. Air Pollutants


1 Thermo pack 33 Bio-Coal

3 MT/Day PM SO2 NOX

Multi Cyclone

Separator

150 mg/Nm3

100 PPM 50 PPM

2 D.G. Set 11 Diesel 50 Lit/day PM SO2 NOX

-- 150 mg/Nm

3

100 PPM 50 PPM

of 64


Page 59 of 64

-

ii Process gas i.e. Type of pollutant gases (SO2, HCl, NH3, Cl2, NOxetc.)

VOC

-

Sr. no.

Source of emission

Type of emission



1 Stack attached

toreactors VOC 11

Water scrubber followedby Carbon adsorptiontower.

--

-

v Fugitive emission details with its mitigation measures.


i

Sr. no.



Category and Schedule as per HW Rules.

Quantity (MT/Annum)

Disposal Method

1. Spent Carbon Process 28.3 3 MT/Year Collection, Storage, transportation, and send to cement industry for co-processing/Common incinerator.

2. DiscardedContainers & Bags/Liners

Raw Material

33.1 32800 Nos. Collection, storage, decontamination, transportation, and sell to registeredrecycler.

3. Used/Spent Oil Lubrication 5.1 0.25 KL/Year

Collection, Storage, transportation,and Sale to authorized Party byGPCB.

4. Distillation Residue

Process 20.3 24 MT/Year Collection, Storage, transportation, and send to cement industry for co-processing/Common incinerator.

5. Process waste

Process 20.4 39 MT/Year Collection, Storage, transportation, and send to cement industry for co-processing/Common incinerator.



Membership will be taken


Appropriate measures will be taken

D i Solvent management (If any)

Details of Solvent recovery (As per respective ToR) Solvent recovery is achieved more than 95% and remaining solvent

of 64


Page 60 of 64

will be absorbedin water.

ii VOC emission sources and its mitigation measures Details are covered in EIA


17/01/2018. During the meeting, the project was appraised based on the information furnished in the


Technical presentation made during the meeting by project proponent. EIA report reveals that baseline

environmental study was carried out during the month of January - 2017 to March - 2017 to determine

the prevailing status of ambient air, land use, noise level topography, meteorology, ecology &

socioeconomic outline. Baseline ambient air quality was measured at nine locations. Monitoring was

carried out for PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx, and VOC within 10 km radius from the project site. The

maximum concentrations of PM10, PM2.5, SO2 and NOx at each ambient air monitoring locations

(Total eight) were compared with NAAQS for industrial, residential, rural and other areas. Concentration

of PM10 ranged from 71.00µg/m3 to 86.60µg/m3. Concentration of PM2.5 recorded from minimum

21.5µg/m3 to maximum 36.89µg/m3. Concentration of SO2 recorded ranged from minimum 6.74µg/m3

to maximum 19.84 µg/m3. Concentration of NO2 recorded ranged from minimum 11.48µg/m3 to

maximum 29.48µg/m3. Concentration of VOC found BDL. The incremental Ground Level Concentration

(GLC) has been computed using ISC-AERMOD View” by Lakes Environmental, Canada. The maximum

24-hourly average ground level concentration for pollutant due to proposed project calculated using

mathematical model (ISCST3) for PM10, SO2, NOx and resultant values also meets with

NAAQstandards . Committee observed that PP has proposed Multi Cyclone separator for proposed

Thermo pack. Unit has also proposed one water scrubber followed by adsorption tower to control VOC

from process reactors. Total fuel requirement of Bio-Coal3 MT/day and Diesel of 50 Lit/day. Total water

consumption for proposed project will be 8 KLD which will be sourced from surface water. Total

industrial wastewater generation will be 14 KLD which will be treated in proposed ETP. Generated

domestic wastewater of 1.5 KLD will be collected and disposed off through soak pit.The treated

wastewater of 12.3 KLD will be recycled. Thus unit will maintain zero liquid discharge.

After deliberation, it was unanimously decided to consider the project for further consideration only after

submission of the following:

1. Submit the shortest human habitation distance from the outer periphery of the project boundary.

2. Submit No Objection Certificate of the GPCB for proposed project.

3. Permission from the CGWA for drawl of ground water.

13 SIA/GJ/IND2/20580/2016 M/s. Anupam Rasayan India Limited (unit-4) Plot no: 907/3, 907/4, GIDC-Jhaghadia, Ta.: Jhagadia,Dist.: Bharuch.

EC Amendment

Technical presentation was made by the PP form amendment in EC. As per the discussion for the point

No1, committee satisfied with the proposal and decided to recommend amendment for

inclusionofMethy 1,3 Dioxolane as product together with 1,4 Dioxane as group as per the material

balance with restriction to produce Methy 1,3 Dioxolane in tune of equivalent or lesser production

capacity of 1,4 Dioxane as mentioned in EC without increase in pollution load.For point 2,3,4

committee asked PP to send proposed hazardous waste to the end users having permission under rule

of 64


Page 61 of 64

9 of the Hazardous and Other Waste Rules 2016.

S. No. EC Condition

Details as per the EC To be amended as Justification/Reasons

1 Sr. No. 01.

1,4 Dioxane 2-Methy 1,3 Dioxolane to be considered as product together with 1,4 Dioxane as group, with restriction to capacity as 1000 MT/ Month.

During the manufacturing of 1,4-Dioxane Co-product 2-Methyl-1,3-Dioxolane is also formed in ratio of 97.5%:2.5% respectively & separated in pure form which can be sold as a product. Proposed to add on this product 2-Methyl-1,3-Dioxolane to our product list without increase in capacity. During the manufacturing process of 1, 4 Dioxane (CAS No: 123-91-1) second product 2-Methyl 1,3 Dioxolane(CAS No:497-26-7) is also formed due to side chain reaction & this product can be separated out from fractional distillation column during distillation. Moreover during this separation no additional utilities i.e. steam or cooling water is utilized as Boiling Point of 2- Methyl 1,3 Dioxolane is 82-83 °C whereas B.P of 1,4 Dioxane is 101 °C and both these products are separated by proper fractional distillation under atmospheric condition only. We can be able to separate out this product 2-Methyl 1,3 Dioxolane in pure form which Could be sold as Product itself as there is good demand of this product in Market. So we proposed to add on this product 2-Methyl 1, 3 Dioxolane to our Product List. Quantity of 2-Methyl 1, 3 Dioxolane = 25 MT / Month.

2. A. Conditions

A.1 Specific

Entire quantity of Nitrosyl Sulphuric Acid (NSA) (986 MT/Month) shall be reused for manufacturing of Chloro Phenol compounds within

Nitrosyl Sulphuric Acid (NSA) to be considered as product instead of hazardous waste.

Nitrosyl Sulphuric Acid (NSA) is not listed in Schedule-II of Rule-9, and when it is used as raw material for diazotization reaction of substituted Amino Phenols, this Nitrosyl Sulphuric Acid (NSA) gives same result as compared to

of 64


Page 62 of 64

Condition Sr. No. 05.

premises. usage of fresh NaNO2& Acid

mixture. Even in certain case, the overall conversion is better. In addition, most importantly, the salt, which is present when NaNO

2 is used, is a

generation of Sodium Salts and the disposal of the same to TSDF site is a problem, whereas when NSA is used there is no such generation of Salts. Nitrosyl Sulphuric Acid (NSA) 35-40% product is manufactured by certain chemical industries and sold as their product such as “M/s. Deepak Nitrite Ltd., M/s. Aceto chem, etc.” Specifications of those companies and profile of our Product is same in all parameters. Report from Pollucon Laboratory.

Alternative mode of disposal as entered in to agreement / MOU with certain industries as given below:

M/s. Anupam Rasayan India Ltd. (Unit-1) Plot No. 8104, 8109, 8110, 8111 & 268/1, Sachin Industrial Estate, GIDC, Sachin, Tal: Choryasi, Dist: Surat -394230.

“Entire qty. of Nitrosyl Sulphuric Acid (NSA) (986 MT/Month) shall be reused within premises

Or / and

Sold to actual end user having valid CCA from GPCB & Rule-9 Permission. ”

3 By-Product

1. Dilute Nitric Acid, 2.

-- To be considered as

By-products with

above.

This by-product is not listed in Schedule-II, Class-C of Rule-9, April 4, 2016. Test report is attached. During the manufacturer Process Meta Di Chloro Benzene (MDCB) from Meta Di Nitro Benzene (MDNB) using Chlorine Gas as Chlorinating agent certain

of 64


Page 63 of 64

Sodium Hypochlorite (8-12%)

quantity of chlorine gas is being escaped without taking part in reaction and as additional precautions we have installed the additional Scrubber of Dilute Caustic solution so as to absorb entire quantity of escaped chlorine to dilute Caustic Solution and converting to 8-10 % Sodium Hypochlorite Solution as Bye Product / Hazardous Waste. Moreover, during this same reaction of De -Nitro Chlorination of Meta Di Nitro Benzene(MDNB) to Meta Di Chloro Benzene (MDCB) Nitrous Oxide is being formed & on scrubbing of this NOx to 98 % Sulphuric Acid we get 35-40 % Nitrosyl Sulphuric Acid as main stream. But at the same time this generated NOx takes up the water molecule from the reaction Mass and ultimately being converted to Dilute Nitric Acid which is separated from reaction Mass and we propose to Sale both these hazardous waste to actual end users having rule 9 permission from the Board.

4. A. Conditions

A.1 Specific Condition Sr. No.02.

Entire qty. of Spent

HCl-30% (3375

MT/Month) shall be

utilized as captive

consumption for the

manufacturing of

Calcium Chloride.

“Entire qty. of spent HCl 30% (3375 MT/Month) shall be reused within premises or sold to end user for manufacturing Calcium Chloride or (Mono/Di/Tri/Meta) Calcium Phosphate, having valid CCA from GPCB & Rule-9 Permission. ”

Alternative mode of disposal as

entered in to agreement / MOU

with certain industries as given

below:

M/s. S. R. Chemicals, Plot No. 7516, GIDC Estate, Ankleshwar, Dist.: Bharuch. = 1000 MT/Month.

2. M/s. Kamdhenu Nutrients Pvt. Ltd., Plot No.22/3, GIDC Estate, Panoli, Tal: Ankleshwar, Dist.: Bharuch = 500 MT/Month.

“Entire qty. spent HCl 30% (3375 MT/Month) shall be reused within premises

Or/ and

Sold to Actual end user for manufacturing Calcium

of 64


Page 64 of 64

Chloride or (Mono/Di/Tri/Meta) Calcium Phosphate, and other suchproducts having valid CCA from GPCB & Rule-9 Permission. ”

After deliberation on various aspects, Committee satisfied with the justification given by the project

proponent and decided to forward the proposal to SEIAA for the grant of amendment in environmental

clearance as requested by Project proponent.

14 SIA/GJ/IND2/19891/2017 M/s. Galaxy Polymers Sr.no.165/ p2, Plot No. 3 & 4, Galaxy Industrial, B/H. Vadalia Foods, Village : Lothada, Ta.& Dist. Rajkot.

Reconsideration for ToR

The project proponent remained absent for three times without any intimation to this office. Committee

decided to delist the proposal from the list of pending applications & to close the file and decided to

recommend permission to withdraw an application of proposed project.

15 SIA/GJ/IND2/20074/2017 M/s, Panoli Intermediates India Pvt Ltd. Plot No.: 156-A & B & 157, GIDC, Nandesari, Tal: Vadodara, Vadodara.

Reconsideration for ToR

The project proponent remained absent for three times. The project proponent has also requested for withdrawal of an application for the proposed project. Committee agreed to delist the proposal from the list of pending applications & to close the file and decided to recommend permission to withdraw an application of proposed project.

Meeting ended with thanks to the Chair and the Members. --------------------------------

Minutes approved by:

1. Dr. Dinesh Misra, Chairman, SEAC 2. Shri S. C. Srivastav, Vice Chairman, SEAC

3. Dr. V. K. Jain, Member, SEAC.

4. Shri V. N. Patel, Member, SEAC

5. Shri K. C. Mistry, Secretary, SEAC

Minutes of the 367th meeting of the ... Minutes of the 367th.pdfPage 1 of 64 367 th meeting of...

Documents

Transcript of Minutes of the 367th meeting of the ... Minutes of the 367th.pdfPage 1 of 64 367 th meeting of...