Minutes of 207th - seiaaup.inseiaaup.in/Uploads/MeetingMinutePdfs/20150313044213PM.pdfMinutes of...

Minutes of 207th SEAC Meeting Dated 03/03/2015

The 207th meeting of SEAC was held in Directorate of Environment, U.P. on

03/03/2015. Following members were present in the meeting along with Secretary,

SEAC:

1. Dr. M. S. Khan, Chairman

2. Dr. S.N. Singh Member

3. Dr. S.K. Upadhayay Member

4. Dr. Asheesh Kumar Singh Member

5. Shri S.C. Bramhchari Member

6. Dr. D. C. Gupta, Member

7. Shri Sanjay Kumar, I.A.S. Secretary

The Chairman welcomed the members to the 207th SEAC meeting.

The minutes of 206th SEAC meeting dated 02/03/2015 were confirmed.

The Members of SEAC unanimously taken following decisions on the agenda points

discussed:

1- Group Housing Project at Sec-C-5, Tronica City, UPSIDC, Ghaziabad, U.P. Sri

Surender Singh, C-5B/7A, Janak Puri, New Delhi. File No. 2359/DD-Y

The project proponent did not appear. The committee directed to close the case and to

reopen only, if a request to this effect is received from the project proponent and that to be

considered in chronological order. The proponent should be informed that no construction is

to be done without conceiving the environmental clearance.

2- Group Housing Project on Plot No-GH-06, at Sector-22D, G.B. Nagar, Yamuna

Expressway, U.P. Smt. Meena Bhargava, G.M. Planning, First Floor, Commercial

Complex, P-2, Sec-Omega-1, Greater Noida, U.P. File No. 2361/DD-Sh

The committee noted that M/s Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development

Authority submitted an application dated 05/06/2014 in the Directorate of Environment for

environmental clearance of Group Housing Project on Plot No-GH-06, at Sector-22D, G.B.

Nagar, Yamuna Expressway, U.P.

A presentation was made by Shri Brijesh, authorized representative of project

proponent along with their consultant M/s Ascenso Enviro Private Limited. The proponent,

through the documents submitted and the presentation made, informed the committee that:-

Minutes of 207th

SEAC Meeting Dated 03/03/2015

of 33

1. The environmental clearance is sought for Group Housing Project on Plot No-GH-06,

at Sector-22D, G.B. Nagar, Yamuna Expressway, U.P. M/s Yamuna Expressway

Industrial Development Authority.

2. Area details of the project are as follows:

S. No. Particulars Area in Sq.m. Percentage

1 Total Plot Area 70,705.9 ---

2 Permissible Ground Coverage 28,282.4 40% of plot area

3 Proposed Ground Coverage

• Residential Ground coverage

• Commercial ground coverage

• Community ground coverage

• Nursery ground coverage

22,622.0 20,742.0

680.0

600.0

600.0

31.99% of plot area 91.6% of Proposed Ground

coverage

3.0% of Proposed Ground coverage



4 Permissible FAR 212,118 300 % of Plot Area

5 Total Proposed FAR @2.01

• Proposed FAR of 1BHK Block-A

• Proposed FAR of 2BHK Block

• FAR of Commercial

• FAR of Nursery school

• FAR of Community Centre

1,42,296

59,418.2

74,227.6

3,400

2,250

3,000

201.2 % of Plot area

41.7 % of Proposed FAR

52.1% 0f Proposed FAR




6 Total Stilt area 19,750.00 27.9 % of Plot area

7 Open area 48,084.00 60% of Plot area

8 Required Green area 50 % of open area 24,041.94 34% 0f Plot area

9 Proposed Green area 52.49 % of open

area

25,239.90 35.6% of Plot area

10 Built up area 1,62,046.00 ----

3. Population details are s follows:

S. No. Types No of unit / Area in

sq.m.

Person Per

Unit

Population

1 Dwelling Units 2240 nos. 5 11,200

2 Nursery School 2,250 sq.m 1 person/4 sq.m. of FAR 563

3 Commercial Area 3,400 sq.m 1 person/3 & 6 sq.m. of FAR 850

4 Community Area 3,000 sq.m 1 person/1.5 sq.m. of FAR 2000

5 Visitor (10 % of DU Population) 1120

Total Population 15733

4. Salient features of the project are as follows:

Name and Location of the Project Group Housing Project at GH-06, Sector 22 D, Yamuna

Expressway Industrial Development Authority, Distt-

Gautam Budh Nagar, U.P.

Developers of the project Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority

Total Plot Area 70,705.9 m

2

Built-up Area (Proposed FAR + Basement area +

Services area) 1, 62, 046.00 m

2

Total Water Consumption 1,148 KLD

Total Freshwater Requirement 779 KLD

Power Requirement 5,485.55kW

Power Backup 5 DG Sets of total capacity of 7010 KVA

(4*1500+ 1*1010)

Total Parking provided 1670 ECS

Solid Waste to be Generated 6027.8 kg/day

No. of RWH Pits 15

5. Water requirement details are as follows:

Description Population Unit water

consumption

(ltrs.)

Total water

required

(KLD)

water

requirement

for domestic

use (KLD)

Flushing/

Recycled water

(KLD)

Minutes of 207th


of 33

Main Dwelling

units

11,200 86 963.20 728.00 235.20

Commercial

Population

850 45 38.25 12.75 25.50

Community

Centre

2,000 15 30.00 12.00 18.00

Nursery School 563 45 25.33 8.44 16.89

Floating

Population

1,120 15 16.80 6.72 10.08

Horticulture 1 25.23 --- ---

DG Cooling 0.9litres/kVA/6

hrs

37.85 --- ---

Fire fighting 1 % of total

water

requirement

11.36 --- ---

Total …. 1,148.03 767.91 305.67

say 1,148 say 768 say 306

6. Solid waste generation details are as follow:

S. No. Category of Solid

Waste

Waste

Generation Rate

Formula Total

Population

Waste Generated

Kg/d

1 Residential Refuse

(Residents+ Visitors)

0.3 to 0.6

kg/cap/day

Total

Population*0.45

12,320 5544

2 Institutional Refuse 0.05 to 0.2

kg/cap/day

Total

Population*0.1

563 56.3

3 Commercial Refuse 0.1 to 0.2

kg/cap/day

Total

Population*0.15

2,850 427.5

Total 6,027.8 kg/day

7. The project proposals are covered under category 8"a" of EIA Notification, 2006, as

amended.

The committee discussed the replies submitted by project proponent and

recommended following TORs and general guidelines for conducting EIA studies regarding

the proposals:

Additional TORs

1. Copy of FAR bye-laws of Development Authority.

2. Width of roads should be as per junction to junction length inside the project.

3. Copy of DPR.

4. Area statement.

5. Certificate that no eco sensitive zone lies with 10 KM of the project.

6. Only roof top water to be harvested in harvesting pits.

7. Copy of no objection from fire fighting is to be submitted.

8. Ownership status/details within 30.0 metre from proposed site.

9. Source of the data related with solid waste quantity may be defined and efforts should

be made to reduce this quantity to 250-300 g/person.

10. A site plan showing the project site and its surroundings with physical features and

topographical details, such as land use, contours and drainage pattern, along with

photographs of the site from all four sides, should be included in the background

information.

11. Sanctioned plans/maps regarding the project with all services plans.

Minutes of 207th


of 33

12. All plans and elevation sections/all service plan/landscape plan/standard

electrification plan/drainage/sewerage plan.

13. Structural plan is to be submitted signed by qualified structural designer.

14. All service plans like sewer drainage water supply rain water harvesting fire fighting

landscape plan is to be submitted.

15. Examine in detail the proposed site with reference to impact on infrastructure

covering water supply, storm water drainage, sewerage, power, etc., and the disposal

of treated/raw wastes from the complex on land/water body and into sewerage system.

16. Water requirement and water management plan alongwith necessary permissions for

discharge.

17. Hydro-geological investigations be carried out and obtain permission from Central

Ground Water Authority for withdrawal of ground water.

18. Consider soil characteristics and permeability for rainwater harvesting proposals,

should be made to prevent ground water contamination. Maximize use of treated

water by recycling and utilization of rainwater.

19. Make provision for safety against failure in the operation of wastewater treatment

facilities. Identify acceptable outfall for treated effluent.

20. Details of green belt as a measure for mitigation of dust and noise and buffer between

habitation and proposed project.

21. Landscape plan, green belts and open spaces may be described separately.

22. Study the existing flora and fauna of the area and the impact of the project on them.

23. Examine existing crèche, education, health facilities, police, post Office, Banks and

other services and make adequate provisions in the proposal.

24. Assess soil erosion in view of the soil characteristics, topography and rainfall pattern.

25. Application of renewable energy/alternate energy, such as solar and wind energy may

be described including solar water heating in the guidelines for entrepreneurs.

26. Consider solid wastes, including e-waste in addition to other solid wastes and their

disposal.

27. Identification of recyclable wastes and waste utilization arrangements may be made.

28. Explore possibility of generating biogas from biodegradable wastes.

29. Arrangements for hazardous waste management may be described as also the

common facilities for waste collection, treatment, recycling and disposal of all

effluent, emission and refuse including MSW, biomedical and hazardous wastes.

Special attention should be made with respect to bird menace.

30. Provisions made for safety in storage of materials, products and wastes may be

described.

31. Disaster management plan should be prepared.

32. Traffic management plan including parking and loading/unloading areas may be

described. Traffic survey should be carried out both on weekdays and weekend.

33. Parking provision is to be made for higher ECS worked out either as per state bye-

laws or construction manual of the MoEF

34. Exclusive Parking area in the basement (excluding other facilities) and surface is to be

clearly mentioned

35. Provide service road for entry and exit to project site.

Minutes of 207th


of 33

36. Use of local building materials should be described.

37. Consider provision of DG Flue Gas emissions to be treated in a scrubber. Stack

details with provisos of sampling port for monitoring be described.

38. Work out MGLC for the combined capacity of DG sets.

39. Provide for conservation of resources, energy efficiency and use of renewable sources

of energy in the light of ECBC code.

40. Application of resettlement and rehabilitation policy may be described. Project

affected persons should be identified and rehabilitation and resettlement plan should

be prepared.

41. Examine separately the details for construction and operation phases both for

Environmental Management Plan and Environmental Monitoring Plan.

42. Environment Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan along with budgetary provision of

minimum 2% of the project cost as discussed in meeting shall be submitted on need

base assessment study in the study area.

43. Details of all internal and peripheral roads width.

44. Source and quantity of required water during construction and management of

generated waste water.

45. Project falling with in 05 Km. area of Wild Life Sanctuary is to obtain a clearance

from National Board Wild Life (NBWL) even if the eco- sensitive zone is not

earmarked.

46. Declare/submit the running cost of STP and other environmental management

services (e.g., Municipal Solid Waste Disposal, Green belt Maintenance, Water

Management etc.) in the proposals which are to be including in the allotment letters.

47. The proponent will submit the schedule of monitoring/data collection programme to

the Office of Directorate, Member Secretary, UP Pollution Control Board and District

Magistrate of related District.

General Guidelines

a. A legal affidavit by the Project proponent on Rs. 100/- non-judicial Stamp Paper, duly

attested by Public Notary, stating that:

I. “There is no litigation pending against the project and/or land in which the project is

proposed to be set up (please give name & ownership etc. of the project) and that for

any such litigation what so ever, the sole responsibility will be borne by the Project

proponent.”

II. “No activity relating to this project (i.e. name of the project) including civil

construction has been undertaken at site except fencing of the site to protect it from

getting encroached and construction of temporary shed(s) for the guard(s). (if fencing

has not been done, then the same may be deleted).

III. “I/We hereby give undertaking that the data and information given in the application,

enclosures and other documents are true to the best of my knowledge and belief and

I/We am/are aware that if any part of the data and information submitted is found to

be false or misleading at any stage, the project will be rejected and clearance given,

if any to the Project will be revoked at our risk and cost.”

IV. Project does not fall under any buffer zone of no-development as declared /identified

under any law.

Minutes of 207th


of 33

b. Another legal affidavit by the consultant stating “(a) that the prescribed TORs have been

complied with (to be deleted if not applicable) & (b) that details and the data presented

are factually correct”, as per MoEF circular dated 04.08.2009 is also to be submitted

along with EIA.

c. Current, site photographs viewing towards the project area from four directions

indicating date of photograph taken, direction from which taken, name of the project,

and signature of Project proponent along with consultant with seal should be submitted,

so as to ensure that no construction has been started before the grant of EC.

d. EIA should strictly follow the guidelines prescribed in annexure-III to the EIA

notification of 2006 and the Methods of Monitoring and analysis (Annexure-IV):

Guidance for assessment of representativeness and reliability of baseline environmental

attributes detailed under EIA manual January, 2001 and other guidelines in the matter.

e. The status of accreditation of the EIA consultant with NABET/QCI shall be specifically

mentioned. The consultant shall certify that his accreditation is for the sector for which

this EIA is prepared.

f. On the front page of EIA/EMP reports, the name of the consultant/consultancy firm

along with their complete details including their accreditation, if any shall be indicated.

g. While submitting the EIA/EMP reports, the name of the experts associated

with/involved in the preparation of these reports and the Name of laboratory through

which the samples have been got analysed should be stated in the report. It shall clearly

be indicated whether said laboratory is accredited by NABL or approved under the

Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (Please refer MoEF office memorandum dated 4th

August, 2009). The name project leader of the EIA study shall also be mentioned.

h. The EIA document shall be printed on both sides, as for as possible.

The Information’s no (a I , II, III & c) asked under the general guidelines is to be

submitted within 15 days from the date of receipt of the letter and remaining of the

information’s is to be submitted along with the EIA.

3- Expansion of Group Housing Project “Arihant Arden” at Plot No-GH-07A,Sector-1,

Greater Noida, U.P. Sri Kaushal Jain, Director, 601, 6th Floor, Plot No-17, Sachdeva

Tower, Karkardooma, New Delhi File No. 2369/DD-Y

The committee noted that M/s Arihant Infra Realtors Pvt. Ltd. submitted an

application dated 11/06/2014 in the Directorate for environmental clearance of Expansion of

Group Housing Project “Arihant Arden” at Plot No-GH-07A,Sector-1, Greater Noida, U.P.

A presentation was made by Shri Kuldeep Tyagi, representative of project proponent

along with their consultant M/s Ascenso Enviro Private Limited. The proponent, through the

documents submitted and the presentation made, informed the committee that:-

1. The environmental clearance is sought for Expansion of Group Housing Project

“Arihant Arden” at Plot No-GH-07A, Sector-1, Greater Noida, U.P. M/s Arihant Infra

Realtors Pvt. Ltd.

2. Comparative area details of the project are as follows:

S N Particulars Area in Sq.m. Percentage

Existing Expansion Total

1 Total Plot Area 39400.000 …… 39400.000

Minutes of 207th


of 33

2 Permissible Ground Coverage 13790.000 …… 13790.000 35% of plot area

3 Proposed Ground Coverage 8345.077 553.099 8898.176 22.58 % of plot area

4 Permissible FAR 108350.000 …… 108350.000 275 % of Plot area

5 Purchasable FAR …. 29550.000 29550.000 75% of Total plot area

6 Total Permissible FAR @ 3.5 of

Plot area

108350.000 29550.000 137900.000 350 % of total Plot area

7 Total Proposed FAR @ of 3.49

of Plot area

107982.195 29621.013 137603.208 349 % of Total plot

area

8 Service Area 4961.87 10432.316 15394.1945 39.1 % of Total Plot

area

9 ESS Area 176.5445 --- 176.5445 0.45 % of Plot Area

10 Stilt 1819.270 4837.826 6657.096 16.8 % of Total Plot

Area

11 Podium …… 6066.285 6066.285 15.3 % of Total Plot

Area

12 Basement area 34013.194 ……. 33146.088 84.12 % of Total Plot

area

13 Open Area (Plot area - Ground

Coverage Area)

31054.923 …….. 30501.824 77.4 % of Total Plot

Area

14 Landscape area required 15527.462 …… 15250.912 50 % of open Area

15 Landscape area provided 27453.465 …… 25823.669 84.6 % of open area

16 Builtup Area 148953.08 50090.33 199043.41

3. Population details are as follows:

S. No. Types Population

Existing Expansion Total

1 Residential Population 5351 1485 6836

2 Servant Units … 393 393

3 Staff 200 … 200

4 Visitor 1000 148 1148

5 Community Area … 702 702



Name and Location of the Project Expansion of Group Housing Project “Arihant Arden” at GH-7 A,

Sector 1, Greater Noida, Distt- Gautam Budh Nagar, U.P.

Developers of the project Arihant Infrra Realtors Pvt.Ltd.

Total Plot Area 39400 m

2

.

Built-up Area (Proposed FAR +

Basement area + Services area) 1, 99, 043.41 m

2

.

Total Water Consumption 677 KLD

Total Freshwater Requirement 667 KLD

Power Requirement 5,320 KVA


(6*625)

Total Parking provided 1727 ECS


No. of RWH Pits 10

Minutes of 207th


of 33

5. Water details are as follows:

S.

No.

Description Population/Area Unit water

consumption

(liters)

Total water

required

(KLD)

Water

requirement

for

Domestic

Use (KLD)

Flushing

Water

(KLD)

1 Residential

Population

7228 86 621.6080 469.820 151.788

2 Visitor(10% of total

Population)

188 15 2.8200 1.128 1.692

3 Staff 200 30 6.0000 2.400 3.600

4 Community Area

1 person/1.5sq m

(468.026 sq m)

702 15 10.5300 4.212 6.318

5 Horticulture 25823.669 sq m 25.8237

6 Fire fighting (1 % of

total water

requirement)

10.00

TOTAL …. …. 676.4417 477.560 163.398

say 677 Says 478 Says 163

6. Solid waste generation details are as follows:

S. No. Category of Solid Waste Waste Generation Rate Population Waste Generated

1 Waste Generation for existing …. 6551 2956

2 Residential Refuse(Residents+

Visitors)

0.3 to 0.6 kg/cap/day 1877 844.65

3 Commercial Refuse+

Community Refuse

0.1 to 0.2 kg/cap/day 702 105.3

Total 3905.95

7. The project proposals are covered under category 8"b" of EIA Notification, 2006, as

amended.

The committee noted that it is an expansion project and observed that earlier

environmental clearance for the project and its compliance has not been submitted which is

required for expansion projects as per appraisal process. The committee directed the project

proponent to submit complete information and deferred the matter till submission of above

information. The committee also directed the architect of the project should also be present in

the meeting. The committee expressed its displeasure in delayed submission of the projects to

the Hon'ble members and the consultants/ proponent was directed not to repeat the same.

There is substantial increase in the built up area such as service area, stilt area and the

addition of the Podium/ancillary area. Desired approvals in this regard may also be

submitted. Copies of all revised maps dully signed by the competent authorities are to be

submitted.

The matter shall be discussed after submission of information as above.

Minutes of 207th


of 33

4- Group Housing Project “Arihant Ambar” at Plot No-GH-16C, Sector-1, Greater

Noida, U.P. Sri Kaushal Jain, Director, 601, 6th Floor, Plot No-17, Sachdeva Tower,

Karkardooma, New Delhi. File No. 2370/AD-H

The committee noted that M/s Citycon Buildwel Pvt. Ltd. submitted an application

dated 10/06/2014 in the Directorate of Environment for environmental clearance of Group

Housing Project “Arihant Ambar” at Plot No-GH-16C, Sector-1, Greater Noida, U.P.

A presentation was made by Shri Kuldeep Tyagi, authorized representative of project

proponent along with their consultant M/s Ascenso Enviro Private Limited. The proponent,


1. The environmental clearance is sought for Group Housing Project “Arihant Ambar” at

Plot No-GH-16C, Sector-1, Greater Noida, U.P. M/s Citycon Buildwel Pvt. Ltd.

2. Area details of the project are as follows:

S. No. Particulars Area in Sq.m. Percentage

1 Total Plot Area 14000.000 ---

2 Permissible Ground Coverage 4900.000 35% of plot area

3 Proposed Ground Coverage 3416.874 24.41 % of plot area

4 Permissible FAR 38500.000 275% of Plot area

5 Purchasable FAR 10500.000 75% of Plot Area

6 Proposed FAR

• Residential FAR

• Commercial FAR

48845.936

48645.936

200.000

348% of plot area

99.5% of Proposed FAR

0.40% of Proposed FAR

7 Total permissible Ancillary Area 7350 52.5 % of plot area

8 Proposed Ancillary FAR(including

ESS area=160.815)

6046.576 43.1 % of Plot area

9 Basement Area

Lower Basement area

Upper Basement area

22214.352

11107.176

11107.176

158.6 % of Plot area

50% of Basement Area

50% of Basement Area

10 Stilt Area 1574.018 ----

11 Built-up Area 78680.882 ----

12 Open Area 10583.126 75.5 % of plot Area

13 Landscape area 5291.563 37.79 % of plot Area

14 Landscape area provided 8062.700 57.7 % of Plot Area

3. Details of building blocks are as follows: S. No. Type of building Storey

1 Tower A G/S+19

2 Tower B G/S+19

3 Tower C G/S+18

4 Tower D G/S+18

5 Commercial Area 200 Sqm

6 Community Area(Tower A & B) 456.362 Sqm

4. Salient features are as follows: Name and Location of the Project Group housing project “Arihant Ambar” at Plot No

GH-16 C, Sector 1, Greater Noida, U.P.

Developers of the project M/s. Citycon Buildwel Pvt Ltd.

Minutes of 207th


of 33

Total Plot Area 14000.00 m

2

.

Built-up Area(Proposed FAR + Basement area +

Services area) 78680.882 m

2

.

Total Water Requirement 279 KLD

Power Requirement 1980 KVA


(3*500 and 1 DG of 500 KVA is on Standby)

Total Parking Proposed 741 ECS


No. of RWH Pits 3

5. 5. Population details are as follows: S. No. Types No of unit/Area in msq Person Per Unit Population

1 Residential Population 602 4.5 2709

2 Visitor (10 % of Residential

Population)

270

3 Community Area 1 person/1.5sq m 270

4 Commercial Area 1 person/3 sq m 67


6. Water requirement are as follows: S.

No.

Description Population /

Area

Unit water

consumption

(liters)

Total

water

required

(KLD)

Water

requirement for

Domestic Use

(KLD)

Flushing

Water

(KLD)

A Residential

Population

2700 86 232.2 175.5 56.7

B Visitor 270 15 4.05 1.62 2.43

C Community /

Commercial

Area Population

337 15 5.05 2.02 3.03

D Horticulture

(8062.70 m2

)

--- 1 liter 8.06 --- ---

E Filter Backwash --- --- 15 --- ---

F Swimming Pool --- --- 5 --- ---

G Fire Fighting

Tank

4 % of total

Water

requirement

10 --- ---

Total 279.36

KLD

Says

279 KLD

179.14 KLD

Says

179 KLD

62.16 KLD

Says

62 KLD

7. Waste water details are as follows: Details Water (KLD)

Water requirement for domestic purpose 179

Wastewater to be generated from domestic use (@ 80% of domestic water requirement) 143

Water requirement for Flushing Purpose 62

Wastewater to be generated from Flushing (@ 100% of flushing requirement) 62

Minutes of 207th


of 33

Total Wastewater generated 143+62

= 205 KLD

8. Solid waste generation details are as follows: S. No. Category of Solid Waste Waste Generation Average Occupancy Waste

generated

1 Residential Refuse 0.3 to 0.6 kg/cap/day 0.45 2970 1336.5

2 Commercial Refuse 0.1 to 0.2 kg/cap/day 1.5 337 50.55

Total waste generated 1387.05

9. The project proposals are covered under category 8"a" of EIA Notification, 2006, as amended.

The committee noted that it is an expansion project and observed that earlier

environmental clearance for the project and its compliance has not been submitted which is

required for expansion projects as per appraisal process. The committee directed the project

proponent to submit complete information and deferred the matter till submission of above

information. The committee also noted that letter dated 28/03/2014 issued by GNIDA

mentions location of the proposed project at sector-12, Greater Noida whereas the application

for environmental clearance mentions the location at sector-1, Greater Noida. this should be

clarified alongwith correct documents. The committee also directed the architect of the

project should also be present in the meeting. The committee also observed that a notice has

been served by the project proponent claiming deemed environmental clearance on the

completion of 105 days of application. The committee deliberated that application was

incomplete with the reasons cited above and hence, claim of deemed clearance on the basis of

incomplete application can not be accepted.


5- Group Housing Project “Jeevan Enclave” at Sector no-2, Sector-J, Sushant Golf

City Extension, Lucknow. Sri Vinod Tikku, Executive Director (Projects), 306,

Ansal Naurang House, 21, KG Marg, New Delhi. File No. 2371/AD-Sub

The committee noted that M/ Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd. submitted an

application dated 06/06/2014 in the Directorate of Environment for environmental clearance

of Group Housing Project “Jeevan Enclave” at Sector no-2, Sector-J, Sushant Golf City

Extension, Lucknow.

A presentation was made by Shri Jonaed Khan, GM, M/s Ansal Properties and

Infrastructure Ltd along with their consultant M/s Min Mec Consultancy Pvt. Ltd., New

Delhi. The proponent, through the documents submitted and the presentation made, informed

the committee that:-

1. The environmental clearance is sought for Group Housing Project “Jeevan Enclave”

at Sector no-2, Sector-J, Sushant Golf City Extension, Lucknow. M/ Ansal Properties

and Infrastructure Ltd.


Project Feature Description

Type of Project “Jeevan Enclave” Group Housing (residential building)

Location Sector-J, Pocket -4 , Sushant Golf Hi-Tech City (extension area),

Lucknow

Project Proponent M/s Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd.

Category of Project Category B, Sl. No. 8(a)

Total Site Area 18231.30 sq.m. or 4.5 acres

Minutes of 207th


of 33

Ground Coverage Achieved - 2899.8 sq.m. (15.9%)

Permissible - 6380.95 sq.m. (35% of plot area)

Built-up Area 42,963.7 sq.m.

FAR Achieved - 36,213.8 (@2.349)

Permissible - 38,541.52 sq.m. (@2.5)

No. of towers 6

No. of floors S+13

Maximum height of tallest tower 43.65

No. of Dwelling units 312

Population 1716 (Residential 1560 + floating 156)

Parking (nos. of ECS) Required = 1.25 cars/unit i.e. 390; Provided = 390

Parking location (a) surface = 342; (b) stilt = 48

Total daily water demand 136.5 KLD

Fresh water demand 102.18 KLD

Source of Water Ground water through 2 nos. tube well & treated waste water from STP

Total Sewage Generation 126.28 KLD

Common STP capacity Centralized STP (23 MLD capacity) of mother city is nearest to this

project & will cater to its sewage

Power Requirement 1800 KW

Source of Power UPPCL

Stand by DG sets 1 X 140 KVA and 1X200 KVA

Green area proposed 2834.4 sq. m i.e. 15.55% of the total plot area

Quantity of solid waste generation 1.06 TPD

Quantity of sludge from STP 0.06 tonnes/day

Quantity of e-waste 3.10 kg/day

Quantity of hazardous wastes variable on DG maintenance

Digging/ filling Digging 7950 cum & filling 12729 cum

Quantity of RW to be harvested 61.62 cum/hr (roof top)

Volume of RWH pits is proposed 21.2 cum

Total no of proposed RWH pits 1 RWH structures + 1 surface water body

Depth to water table 6 m bgl

3. Land use details of the total plot area are as follows:

Sr. No. Description Area (Sq.m) (%)

1. Ground coverage 2899.8 15.91

2. Green* 2834.4 15.55

3. Water body 136.87 0.75

4. Road area 7657.69 42.00

5. Surface parking 4702.5 25.79

Total 18231.26 100

4. Water requirement details are as follows:

Particulars Total

Population

Water Requirement /Person/Unit Total Water Requirement

Domestic

water

demand

Flushing

water

Total water

requirement

Domestic

water

demand

Flushing

water

Total water

requirement

(LPD) (LPD) (LPD)

Residential 1560 65 21 86 101400 32760 134160

Floating 156 5 10 15 780 1560 2340

Total 1716 102180 34320 136500

Total in

KLD

102.18 34.32 136.5

Other demands

Green Area (sq. m.), KLD 2.83

15% unaccounted for water (Occasional

emergency use or leakage), KL

20.475

Fire fighting demand [100(P)0.5] in KL,

P- Population in Thousand (1 time requirement)

131

Minutes of 207th


of 33

5. Sewage generation during Operation as126.28 KLD.

6. Since this GH is adjoining mother city, there is a provision of conveying sewage out

from this GH through pipelines up to the centralized STP of Mother city. The capacity

(23 MLD) of centralized STP of Mother city has been calculated considering amount

of sewage generated from this GH also.


Sl.No Solid waste Quantity Disposal/ Management

Construction Stage

1. Digging 7950 cum 12729 Cum material will be used for filling which will be higher

than the cutting involved. The fill material will be brought from

elevated area of Sushant Golf Hi-tech City and its extension areas.

Operation Stage

2. STP Sludge 0.06

Tonnes/day

Used as manure after composting.

3. Municipal Solid

Waste

1.06

Tonnes/day

• Segregation at source into (i) biodegradable, (ii) recyclable

and (iii) non-biodegradable categories.

• Recyclable material shall be sold for recycling to authorized vendors.

• The organic and non compostable waste shall be sent to proposed centralized 300 TPD pyrolysis plant in township,

when there will be full occupancy, resulting in compressed

gas, distilled water and carbon.

• Till such time ,the plant becomes operational, disposal of

waste will be done in the existing / proposed landfill sites

of LDA

4. E-waste 3.10 kg/day Separate e-waste collection bin on project site from where periodic

evacuation by State /CPCB approved vendors.

5. Hazardous waste Intermittent Hazardous waste shall be collected at township level at designated centralized collection point and thereafter collected by authorized

recyclers. (M/S Datta Enterprises)


amended.

The committee noted that water requirement has been revised by the project proponent through letter dated 03/03/2015. The water requirement which was earlier computed @

135 LPCD for residential population and 45 LPCD for floating population has been again computed and submitted respectively @ 86 LPCD and 15 LPCD. The committee also

observed the following issues: 1. Copy of layout approval from the competent authority should be submitted.

2. Area for green, road, parking should be specifically mentioned.

3. A revised form-1 with changed details of water requirement and consecutively

related parameters should be submitted.

4. Water requirement is proposed to be met through ground water extraction. A

water budgeting statement showing water extraction and recharge should be

submitted keeping in view the competing users in surrounding areas.

5. All road width in the lay out should be mentioned.

6. Show minimum 3.0 metre green on all sides as suggested.

7. Only roof top water to be used in rain harvesting pits.

The committee discussed the matter and recommended grant of environmental

clearance on the project proposals alongwith general conditions as prescribed by the authority

Minutes of 207th


of 33

earlier and following specific conditions subject to submission of information as above within

15 days:

1. Landfill as proposed by LA. to be used if not done alternative source of land fill site is to be thought off.

2. Provide at least two monitoring points to observe Air quality.

3. 100% use of solar energy to be provided.

4. Adequate green cover should be provided within the premises.

5. For the treatment for total sewage, a full-fledged STP is to be provided with 20% more

capacity than waste water generated during operation phase.100% waste water is to be

treated in captive STP conforming to prescribed standards of receiving body for

designated use. Monitoring of STP to be done daily till its stabilization.

6. Recycling of water as proposed shall be undertaken with regular testing and monitoring

of treated water.

7. Dedicated power supply for STPs is to be ensured during operation. Sludge of STP is to

be used in-house as manure and surplus manure should be managed by giving it to end

users. 8. Environmental Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan along with budgetary provision

amounting to 2% of total project cost shall be prepared and approved by Board of Directors of the company. A copy of resolution as above shall be submitted to the

authority. 9. Isolated place for Municipal Solid Waste handling and the disposal shall be provided in

accordance with Municipal Solid Waste (Management and Handling Rules), 2000 (as amended).

10. Organic waste converter for solid waste management shall be installed and plan submitted.

11. LEDs should be used in all common areas and corridors. 100% Solar lighting is to be

provided in the common areas/common stairs.

12. Parking guideline as per Lucknow Development Authority should be followed. Parking

for disabled persons should be explored.

13. All entry/exit point should be bell mouth shaped.

14. To discharge excess treated waste water into public drainage system, permission from

the competent authority to be taken prior to any discharge.

15. 100 % provision of Rain Water Harvesting is to be made. RWH shall be initially done

only from the roof top. RWH from green and other open areas shall be done only after

permission from CGWB.

16. Height of the stack should be provided as discussed based on combined DG sets capacity and be 6mt higher than the tallest building.

17. Post project monitoring for air, water (surface+ ground), Stack noise of D.G. sets, STP to be carried out as CPCB Guidelines.

18. Crèche to be provided during the construction/operation phase. 19. Provision of separate room for senior citizen with proper amenities shall be made.

20. Protection shall be provided on the windows of the high rise flats for security of residents.

21. Criteria/ norms provided by competent Authority regarding the seismic zone be followed for construction work.

22. Dual plumbing should be adopted.

23. Unless and until all the environmental issues are sorted out the occupancy will be restricted and would be only allowed after achieving the Permission from the competent

authority.

Minutes of 207th


of 33

24. The project proponent shall ensure that the project site does not attract/infringe any

buffer zone of no activity identified/declared under law.

25. Ground water should not be extracted for the purpose of construction or otherwise. In

case of default the Environmental Clearance will deem to be cancelled.

26. Sprinkler to be used for curing and quenching and ready mix concrete may be used for

construction.

27. Possibilities of use of treated waste water for irrigation purposes should be explored. 28. No fresh water will be used for irrigation purpose.

29. Mobile toilets, safe drinking water facility, sanitation facility and eco friendly fuels etc. Shall be made available to the temporary residents/workers at the project site including

the proper treatment and the disposal of the wastes.

6- Group Housing Project “Vinayak Apartments” at Sector-7B, Majhola Yojna No-4,

Part-II, Moradabad, U.P. Sri Sachin Kumar, Leagal Officer, Uninav Developers

Pvt. Ltd.,117, Ist Floor, Ram Vihar, Near YSC Gate No-1, Delhi File No.2372/SPO-V

The committee observed that the project report has not been received by the

members. Hence, the matter shall be deferred till next meeting. The project proponent

shall ensure submission of project report to all committee members.

7- Revision and Modification of Group Housing Project “Case Grande-II” at Sector-

Chi-V, Greater Noida. Sri Mradul Srivastav,Earthcon Construction Pvt. Ltd., J-

25A, Sector-18, Noida. File No. 2379/DD-Y

The committee noted that M/ Earthcon Construction Pvt. Ltd. submitted an undated

application received on 20/06/2014 in the Directorate of Environment for environmental

clearance of Group Housing Project “Case Grande-II” at Sector-Chi-V, Greater Noida U.P.

A presentation was made by Shri Mridul Srivastava, representative of project

proponent along with their consultant M/s Greencindia Consulting (P) Ltd. The proponent,


1. The environmental clearance is sought for Revision and Modification of Group

Housing Project “Case Grande-II” at Sector-Chi-V, Greater Noida, U.P. M/s Earthcon

Construction Pvt. Ltd.

2. The Project has already granted Environment Clearance vide ref. no.

1562/praya/SEAC/1530/2012/DD(SH) dated 07/10/2013 from SEIAA, UP on plot

area of 18154 sqm and built-up area of 83415.021 sqm. Since the project added 0.75

additional FAR hence built-up area would be increase to 93416.118 sqm.

3. Comparative area details of the project are as follows:

Project “Casa Grande - II” Group Housing Project at Sector CHI-V, Greater Noida,

UP

Description Previous Details Revised Details Additional

Plot Area 18,154 m

2

18,154 m2

-

Built up Area 83415 m

2

93416 m2

10001 m2

Ground Coverage

Achieved 3693.273 m

2

3640.594 m2

- 52.679 m2

Landscape area 9649.727 m

2

7503.602 m2

- 2146.125 m2

Minutes of 207th


of 33

Dwelling Units 680 846 166

FAR 2.74 3.49 0.75

Max. Height of Building 54.9 m 67 m 12.1 m

4. Area details are as follows:

Category Area (Ha) Area (m

2

) Area (%)

Ground Coverage 0.364 3640.59 20.05

Landscape Area 0.750 7503.60 41.33

Area under Road 0.475 4753.01 26.18

Surface Parking 0.032 324.48 1.79

Water Bodies 0.025 259.49 1.43

Incidental Open Space 0.167 1673.83 9.22

Total Area 1.81 18154 100.00

5. Salient feature of the project are as follows:

Project “Casa Grande - II” Group Housing Project at Sector CHI-V, Greater

Noida, UP

Description Previous Details Revised Details Additional

Population 3060 3924 864

Water Requirement 304 KLD 445 KLD 141 KLD

Source Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority & STP

Waste water Generation 235 KLD 299 KLD 64 KLD

STP Capacity 300 KLD 370 KLD 70 KLD

Power Requirements & Source 3419.67 kVA 3419.67 kVA -

NPCL NPCL -

Total Solid Waste Generation 1046.48 kg/day 1216.8 kg/day 170.32 kg/day

6. Building details are as follows:

Description Previous Revised Additional

Tower A

Tower B Tower C

Tower A

Tower B Tower C Tower A

Tower B

Tower C

No. of

Floors

G+17 G+17 G+16 G+21 G+21 G+20 4 floors 4 floors 4 floors

Total

Dwelling

Units

216 210 254 264 262 320 48 52 66

Population 972 945 1143 1218 1209 1487 246 264 344

Total

Population

3060 3924 864

Building

Height

54.9 m 54.9 m 51.6 m 67 m 67 m 65.7 m 12.1 12.1 14.1

Total Build

up Area 83415 m

2

93416 m2

10001 m2

FAR 2.74 3.49 0.75

7. Water requirement are as follows:

Sl. No. Description No. of person

/m2

Water consumption

(KLD) Total water

requirement

(KLD)

Source

Fresh

water Treated

Water

A Residential occupants 3924 164.81 172.66 337.46 GNDA

& STP

B Visitors 393 1.97 3.93 5.90

C Service Staff 153 9.95 3.21 13.16

D Commercial 60 0.90 1.80 2.70

E Landscaping 10521.81 - 10.52 10.52 STP

F Road washing/ Road side

tree watering/DG Cooling

- - 75.00 75.00

Sub total (A+B+C+D+E+F) 444.7 (say 445)

Total Requirement 445

Minutes of 207th


of 33

8. Waste water generation details are as follows:

Sl.

No. Description Total

Population Fresh

Water

Requirement

(KLD)

Treated

Water

Requirement

(KLD)

Waste water

Generation(KLD) Source

a Residential

Occupants

3924 164.81 172.66 281.15 STP

capacity of

370 KLD is

proposed

based on FAB

Technology

b Visitors 393 1.97 3.93 5.2

c Maintenance Staff 153 9.95 3.21 10.7

d Commercial 60 0.90 1.80 1.95

f Landscaping - - 10.52 -

g Road Washing /

Road Side Tree

Watering

- - 75.00 -

Sub Total 445 299


amended.

The committee noted that the project proponent have submitted previous E.C. letter,

sanctioned building plans, Fire NOC, NOC from Airport Authority of India, Land documents,

Certificate from structural engineer, Declaration from project proponent regarding CSR

activities, provisions of green buffer and land ownership details about adjacent lands around

the project. The project proponent also informed that due to typographical error page no.

3/19, 3 and 4/48 and 3/15 of form-1, form-1A and conceptual plan have been revised and are

again been submitted. The project proponent also submitted a declaration that no construction

activities have been done at the project site as on date.

The committee discussed the matter and recommended grant of environmental

clearance on the project proposals alongwith general conditions as prescribed by the authority earlier and following specific conditions:

1. Adequate green cover should be provided within the premises. 2. For the treatment for total sewage, a full-fledged STP is to be provided with 20% more





of treated water.



users.

5. Environmental Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan along with budgetary provision

amounting to Rs. 2.0 crore of total project cost shall be prepared and approved by Board

of Directors of the company. A copy of resolution as above shall be submitted to the

authority.

6. Isolated place for Municipal Solid Waste handling and the disposal shall be provided in accordance with Municipal Solid Waste (Management and Handling Rules), 2000 (as

amended). 7. Organic waste converter for solid waste management shall be installed and plan

submitted. 8. LEDs should be used in all common areas and corridors. 100% Solar lighting is to be


Minutes of 207th


of 33

9. Parking guideline as per Greater Noida Development Authority should be followed.

Parking for disabled persons should be explored.





only from the roof top. RWH from green and other open areas shall be done only after permission from CGWB.




17. Protection shall be provided on the windows of the high rise flats for security of

residents.

18. Criteria/ norms provided by competent Authority regarding the seismic zone be

followed for construction work.


20. Unless and until all the environmental issues are sorted out the occupancy will be

restricted and would be only allowed after achieving the Permission from the competent

authority.





23. Sprinkler to be used for curing and quenching and ready mix concrete may be used for construction.




8- Group Housing Project at Plot No-GH-6B, Sector-1, Greater Noida, U.P. Sri R C

Goel, Director,M-33, 2nd Floor, Greater Kailash-1, New Delhi File No. 2358/OSD-T

The committee noted that the matter was earlier discussed in SEAC meeting dated

21/02/2015 wherein the committee directed to revise the proposals as per approved FAR. The

project proponent submitted revised application through letter dated 23/02/2015.

A presentation was made by Shri S.S. Rathi, representative of project proponent along

with their consultant M/s Paramarsh. The committee discussed the presentation and directed

to the project proponent to submit the following information:-

1- Status of existing road.

2- Plan for front and rear set back by laws.

3- All approved layout plan/building plan/service plans from the competent authority is

to be submitted with the signature of an architect certifying that they are all in the

conformity with the master plan of the area and as per building bylaws/rules and

Minutes of 207th


of 33

regulation of the authority. Submit structural design with the signature of

competent/qualified structural engineer.

4- Ancillary area (duct, Storage, stair case etc. ) detail.

5- Copy of land allotment letter.

6- Environmental sensitivity in 10 KM area.

7- Copy of all sanctioned map

8- Areas under park, road, other facilities, over head tank alongwith its percentage of total area.

9- Tower/block wise area details. 10- Environmental Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan with 2.50 crore along with

budgetary provision amounting of total project cost shall be prepared and submitted. 11- Plan for 100% solar energy shall be used for open spaces and common stair case.

12- Physical features within 30 m of the project site alongwith corresponding ownership. 13- Permission of municipal authority for discharge of waste water into municipal

sewer/drain.

14- Running cost of operation and maintenance of STP and other environmental

management facilitates.

15- Letter of development authority through which increase FAR has been permitted.

16- Corrected Width of internal roads according to length of junction to junction.

17- Land use of the proposed site as per proposed activity along with related papers.

18- Approach road width to be shown.

19- All the documents presented in the SEAC meeting should be duly sign by the

Proponent.

20- Land scape plan to be submitted with list of trees. 03 metre green to be provided all

side of the proposed site.

21- Copy of NOC from fire fighting is to be submitted.

22- Map of surface parking to be submitted.

23- NOC from Air Port Authority to be submitted.

24- Plan for tertiary treatment of STP effluent.

25- Plan for modular basement or surface parking.

26- Plan for 1% of total water demand for the fire fitting requirement.

27- Details of Stilt parking plan to be submitted. Copy of by-laws for provision of podium

to be submitted.

28- In project report, water quality of Yamuna River has been mentioned with BOD 75. In

this regard CPCB data showing water quality for river Yamuna and river Hindman is

to be presented.


9- “F.H. Medical College, NH-2, Tundla, Firozabad,U.P. Dr. Javed Anwar Warsi,

Chairman, NH-2,Railway, Over Bridge,Tundla, Firozabad, U.P. File No. 1535/AD-H

The SEAC noted that matter was discussed in the SEAC meeting dated 12-01-2015

and committee was informed that the construction work has already been started regarding

the project prior to environmental clearance. The committee had directed to take further

necessary action as per MoEF OM dated 12/12/2012 related to violation cases. Accordingly, the State Govt. was requested to direct UPPCB for initiation of legal action in the matter for

violation of E.P. Act through letter dated 25/08/2014. UPPCB through his letter dated

29/12/2014 has informed that legal action in the matter has been initiated in the court of Chief

Judicial Magistrate, Firozabad under E.P. Act, 1986. The committee discussed the letter dated

Minutes of 207th


of 33

29/12/2014 of UPPCB and also the provisions of notification dated 22/12/2014 wherein

School, College, Hostel of Educational Institution have not been included in projects or

activities. The committee directed that a clarification should be sought from MoEF Govt. of

India whether the proposed project shall be covered under EIA Notification or not in the light

of notification dated 22/12/2014.

The SEAC directed the project proponent to submit the following information:-

1. All approved layout plan/building plan/service plans from the competent authority is to be submitted with the signature of an architect certifying that they are all in

the conformity with the master plan of the area and as per building bylaws/rules and regulation of the authority. Submit structural design with the signature of

competent/qualified structural engineer. 2. Approval of medical council of India.

3. Year wise construction detail.

4. Send the copy of project report to all the members.

5. Site photographs from all angles.


10- Tannery (Raw hide to finish leather) at A-4, LTP, UPSIDC, Banthar, Unnao., M/s

Homera Tanning Industries Pvt. Ltd. Mr. Zamar Rizwan, Director, M/s Homera

Tanning Industries Pvt. Ltd. A-4, LTP, UPSIDC, Banthar, Unnao. File No. 891/DD-Y


06/06/2014. The committee/SEIAA, in view of violation of E.P. Act undertaken by the

proponent, directed to proceed as per provisions of MoEF OM dated 12/12/2012. Director,

Environment sent a proposal to State Govt. for issuing directions of UPPCB for initiation of

legal action in the matter. State Govt. through letter dated 09/09/2014 directed Member

Secretary, UPPCB to initiate legal action in the matter for violation of E.P. Act. The matter

was again listed in SEAC meeting dated 03/03/2015. The committee noted that project

proponent has appeared in the meeting without any presentation. The committee provided

opportunity to project proponent to put up his matter and after hearing the proponent, the

committee directed the project proponent to submit the following information:-

1- Date of unit registration.

2- Status of NOC of UPPCB. Copy in this regard should be submitted.

3- Prosecution date.

4- Detail of commencement of first production & Regular production.

5- Year wise construction.

6- Total production alongwith production from last year 2012.

7- Date of regular production is to be submitted. 8- Present Status of the industry.

9- Copy of the trial/regular consent orders issued by the UPPCB. 10- Exact Date of commencement of the production duly verified.

11- Copies of the consent refusal letters if any issued by the Board. 12- Copy of the membership of the CETP, Banthar, Unnao.

The matter will be considered in the receipt of the following information.

Minutes of 207th


of 33

11- “Cement Grinding Unit” A-52, Industrial Area, Sathariya, Jaunpur U.P. Sri Ashok

Kr Pandey R/o 351/A/2. Chilbila, Pratapgarh,U.P File No. 1611/TA-M

The project proponent did not appear. The committee directed to close the

case and to reopen only, if a request to this effect is received from the project

proponent and that to be considered in chronological order. The proponent should be

informed that no construction is to be done without conceiving the environmental clearance.

12- “Installation of Gas Turbine (20MW) with HRSC at Mathura Refinery of Indian Oil

Corporation Ltd. Sri C. Shankar, General Manager (HSE), Indian Oil Corporation

Ltd., Mathura Refinery, Mathura. File No. 1555/DD-DS/OSD-T


Committee Members yet hence, the project proponent should be directed to

communicate the same to all Members and the matter should be listed for next

meeting.

13- Industrial “Tritech Leather Cluster” Located A-1, A-2 and A-3, Industrial area,

Unnao. Mr. B.K. Singhal, Chief Operating Officer, Meena Steels Limited, C-7, Site-

1, Panki Industrial Area, Kanpur. File No. 2098/DD-Y

The committee noted that the application for Industrial “Tritech Leather Cluster”

Located A-1, A-2 and A-3, Industrial area, Unnao was submitted through undated letter received in the Directorate on 07/03/2014. Terms of reference in the matter were issued

through letter no. 1029 dated 13/08/2014. Final EIA report was submitted by project proponent through letter dated 28/10/2014.

A presentation was made by Shri B.K. Singhal, representative of project proponent along with their consultant M/s GRC. The committee discussed the matter and

directed the project proponent to submit the following information:-

1- Approved UPSIDC layout plan showing proposed site. 2- Plan for the provision of green belt as per the State Govt. through G.O. No.

469/55(Parya)/05 dated 22/02/. 3- Affidavit from board of directors regarding zero liquid discharge.

4- Affidavit for the operation of CETP by the special propose vehicle. 5- Affidavit regarding that during operation phase only 600 KLD fresh water will be

used.

6- Ground water permission from CGWB. Permission letter to be submitted.

7- Copy of DPR to be submitted.

8- Check the lay out as per UPSIDC guide lines.

9- Organised green space should be left as suggested.

10- Affidavit of 0% discharge is to be submitted.

11- Plan for reuse of rain water harvesting be explored.

12- Provision of on line stations to Check Ambient Air Quality. Plan to be submitted.

13- Schedule of construction project to be given.

14- CSR plan for minimum Rs. 5.0 crore. Plan in this regard should be prepared and

submitted.

15- Detailed project report of the CETP with drawings may be provided. Copy of the

approval of the Building/Site Plans may also be provided showing the drainage

system.


Minutes of 207th


of 33

14- Group Housing Project, at Plot No-07, Sector-P-4, Builders Area, Greater Noida,

U.P. Sri Gagan Gupta, Astt. Director, (Tech),Central Government Employees

Welfare Housing Organisation, 6th Floor, A Wing, Janpath Bhawan, Janpath,

Lucknow. File No. 2257/AD-H


Committee Members yet hence, the project proponent should be directed to communicate the same to all Members and the matter should be listed for next

meeting.

15- Group Housing Project at Plot No-GH-09D, Sector-Techzone, Greater Noida. Sri

Pawan Agrawal, Director, 434, Jagriti Enclave, New Delhi. File No. 2459/DD-Y

The committee noted that M/s Samridhi Realty Homes Pvt. Ltd. submitted an

application dated 21/01/2015 in the Directorate for environmental clearance of Group

Housing Project at Plot No-GH-09D, Sector-Techzone, Greater Noida. The project

proponent along with their consultant M/s ENV Developmental Assistance Systems Pvt

appeared in the meeting and informed the committee regarding the submission of EIA

report. The SEAC noted that the terms of reference for conducting EIA studies has not

been issued to the project proponent. Therefore, the SEAC directed that following terms

of reference should be issued in the matter:

Additional TORs

1. A site plan showing the project site and its surroundings with physical features and

topographical details, such as land use, contours and drainage pattern, along with

photographs of the site from all four sides, should be included in the background

information.

2. Sanctioned plans/maps regarding the project with all services plans.

3. All plans and elevation sections/all service plan/landscape plan/standard

electrification plan/drainage/sewerage plan.

4. Structural plan is to be submitted signed by qualified structural designer.

5. All service plans like sewer drainage water supply rain water harvesting fire fighting

landscape plan is to be submitted.

6. Examine in detail the proposed site with reference to impact on infrastructure

covering water supply, storm water drainage, sewerage, power, etc., and the disposal

of treated/raw wastes from the complex on land/water body and into sewerage system.

7. Water requirement and water management plan alongwith necessary permissions for

discharge.

8. Hydro-geological investigations be carried out and obtain permission from Central

Ground Water Authority for withdrawal of ground water.

9. Consider soil characteristics and permeability for rainwater harvesting proposals,

should be made to prevent ground water contamination. Maximize use of treated

water by recycling and utilization of rainwater.

10. Make provision for safety against failure in the operation of wastewater treatment

facilities. Identify acceptable outfall for treated effluent.

11. Details of green belt as a measure for mitigation of dust and noise and buffer between

Minutes of 207th


of 33

habitation and proposed project.

12. Landscape plan, green belts and open spaces may be described separately.

13. Study the existing flora and fauna of the area and the impact of the project on them.

14. Examine existing crèche, education, health facilities, police, post Office, Banks and

other services and make adequate provisions in the proposal.

15. Assess soil erosion in view of the soil characteristics, topography and rainfall pattern.

16. Application of renewable energy/alternate energy, such as solar and wind energy may

be described including solar water heating in the guidelines for entrepreneurs.

17. Consider solid wastes, including e-waste in addition to other solid wastes and their

disposal.

18. Identification of recyclable wastes and waste utilization arrangements may be made.

19. Explore possibility of generating biogas from biodegradable wastes.

20. Arrangements for hazardous waste management may be described as also the

common facilities for waste collection, treatment, recycling and disposal of all

effluent, emission and refuse including MSW, biomedical and hazardous wastes.

Special attention should be made with respect to bird menace.

21. Provisions made for safety in storage of materials, products and wastes may be

described.

22. Disaster management plan should be prepared.

23. Traffic management plan including parking and loading/unloading areas may be

described. Traffic survey should be carried out both on weekdays and weekend.

24. Parking provision is to be made for higher ECS worked out either as per state bye-

laws or construction manual of the MoEF

25. Exclusive Parking area in the basement (excluding other facilities) and surface is to be

clearly mentioned

26. Provide service road for entry and exit to project site.

27. Use of local building materials should be described.

28. Consider provision of DG Flue Gas emissions to be treated in a scrubber. Stack

details with provisos of sampling port for monitoring be described.

29. Work out MGLC for the combined capacity of DG sets.

30. Provide for conservation of resources, energy efficiency and use of renewable sources

of energy in the light of ECBC code.

31. Application of resettlement and rehabilitation policy may be described. Project

affected persons should be identified and rehabilitation and resettlement plan should

be prepared.

32. Examine separately the details for construction and operation phases both for

Environmental Management Plan and Environmental Monitoring Plan.

33. Environment Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan along with budgetary provision of

minimum 2% of the project cost as discussed in meeting shall be submitted on need

base assessment study in the study area.

34. Details of all internal and peripheral roads width.

35. Source and quantity of required water during construction and management of

generated waste water.

36. Project falling with in 05 Km. area of Wild Life Sanctuary is to obtain a clearance

Minutes of 207th


of 33

from National Board Wild Life (NBWL) even if the eco- sensitive zone is not

earmarked.

37. Declare/submit the running cost of STP and other environmental management

services (e.g., Municipal Solid Waste Disposal, Green belt Maintenance, Water

Management etc.) in the proposals which are to be including in the allotment letters.

38. The proponent will submit the schedule of monitoring/data collection programme to

the Office of Directorate, Member Secretary, UP Pollution Control Board and District

Magistrate of related District.

General Guidelines

a. A legal affidavit by the Project proponent on Rs. 100/- non-judicial Stamp Paper, duly

attested by Public Notary, stating that:

I. “There is no litigation pending against the project and/or land in which the project is

proposed to be set up (please give name & ownership etc. of the project) and that for

any such litigation what so ever, the sole responsibility will be borne by the Project

proponent.”

II. “No activity relating to this project (i.e. name of the project) including civil

construction has been undertaken at site except fencing of the site to protect it from

getting encroached and construction of temporary shed(s) for the guard(s). (if fencing

has not been done, then the same may be deleted).

III. “I/We hereby give undertaking that the data and information given in the application,

enclosures and other documents are true to the best of my knowledge and belief and

I/We am/are aware that if any part of the data and information submitted is found to

be false or misleading at any stage, the project will be rejected and clearance given,

if any to the Project will be revoked at our risk and cost.”

IV. Project does not fall under any buffer zone of no-development as declared /identified

under any law.

b. Another legal affidavit by the consultant stating “(a) that the prescribed TORs have been

complied with (to be deleted if not applicable) & (b) that details and the data presented

are factually correct”, as per MoEF circular dated 04.08.2009 is also to be submitted

along with EIA.

c. Current, site photographs viewing towards the project area from four directions

indicating date of photograph taken, direction from which taken, name of the project,

and signature of Project proponent along with consultant with seal should be submitted,

so as to ensure that no construction has been started before the grant of EC.

d. EIA should strictly follow the guidelines prescribed in annexure-III to the EIA

notification of 2006 and the Methods of Monitoring and analysis (Annexure-IV):

Guidance for assessment of representativeness and reliability of baseline environmental

attributes detailed under EIA manual January, 2001 and other guidelines in the matter.

e. The status of accreditation of the EIA consultant with NABET/QCI shall be specifically

mentioned. The consultant shall certify that his accreditation is for the sector for which

this EIA is prepared.

f. On the front page of EIA/EMP reports, the name of the consultant/consultancy firm

along with their complete details including their accreditation, if any shall be indicated.

Minutes of 207th


of 33

g. While submitting the EIA/EMP reports, the name of the experts associated

with/involved in the preparation of these reports and the Name of laboratory through

which the samples have been got analysed should be stated in the report. It shall clearly

be indicated whether said laboratory is accredited by NABL or approved under the

Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (Please refer MoEF office memorandum dated 4th

August, 2009). The name project leader of the EIA study shall also be mentioned.

h. The EIA document shall be printed on both sides, as for as possible.

The Information’s no (a I , II, III & c) asked under the general guidelines is to be

submitted within 15 days from the date of receipt of the letter and remaining of the

information’s is to be submitted along with the EIA.

16- M/s Omega International, Unit-4, Plot No-B-11/c & B-11/D, UPSIDC Industrial

Area, Site-II, Unnao. Sri Asfand Akhtar, M/s Omega International, Unit-4, UPSIDC

Industrial Area, Site-II, Unnao. File No. 2421/AD-Sub.

The project proponent did not appear. The committee directed to close the case and to reopen only, if a request to this effect is received from the project proponent and

that to be considered in chronological order. The proponent should be informed that no construction is to be done without conceiving the environmental clearance.

17- Cement Grinding Plant at Plot No-F-6&7, Vill-Udayrampur Nangla, Tehsil-

Dhaulana, Distt-Hapur. Sri Man Mohan Goel, Director, Plot No-F-6 & 7,Vill-

Udayrampur Nangla Tehsil-Dhaulana, Distt-Hapur. File No. 2470/AD-H

The project proponent did not appear. The committee directed to close the case

and to reopen only, if a request to this effect is received from the project proponent and

that to be considered in chronological order. The proponent should be informed that no

construction is to be done without conceiving the environmental clearance.

18- Tannery Project of HMA Natural Food Ltd., Plot No-1478-1496, Sheshpur, Nari,

Unnao, U.P. HMA Natural Food Ltd, LIG-15, Ganga Vihar, Krantinagar

Chauraha, KDA Colony, Jajmau, Kanpur File No. 1616/DD-D

The project proponent did not appear. The committee directed to close the case and to reopen only, if a request to this effect is received from the project

proponent and that to be considered in chronological order. The proponent should be informed that no construction is to be done without conceiving the environmental

clearance.

19- Group Housing Project at Plot No-SC-01/B-1, Sector-79, Noida, U.P. M/s Sequel

Building Concepts Pvt. Ltd. Sri Vijay Kumar Tuteja, 3H, Plaza M6, Jasola District

Centre, Jasola, New Delhi. File No. 2261/DD-Y


10/01/2015 wherein the project proponent was directed to submit following information:

1. Details of the internal roads and setback of the scheme and that should be

shown alongwith their width.

Minutes of 207th


of 33

2. All approved layout plan/building plan/service plans from the competent

authority is to be submitted with the signature of an architect certifying that

they are all in the conformity with the master plan of the area and as per

building bylaws/rules and regulation of the authority. Submit structural design

with the signature of competent/qualified structural engineer.

3. Waste water treatment upto tertiary level should be revised as per discussion

with committee.

4. As per discussion with committee, responsibility for the disposal of Solid

waste is laid at the level of project proponent hence the plan should be

submitted in this regard.

5. Exemption from EWS/LIG norms, a copy of letter from the competent

Authority is to be submitted.

6. Copy of commitment letter regarding power and water supply.

7. A CSR Plan with 2% of total project cost should be prepared and details with

the commitment letter should be submitted.

8. As no surface parking is permitted hence parking plan should be revised as per

the discussion with the committee. Proposed internal zig zag road be checked

as smoothly run the fire fighting vehicle.

9. Rain water harvesting pits should only be connected from roof tops. Plan for

storm water drains should be submitted.

10. NOC from Airport and Fire Authority should be submitted.

11. Permission from the competent authority for the disposal of waste water to the

public sewer should be submitted.

12. Modified FAR from 1.5 to 2.75 Noida Authority letter is to be submitted.

13. Solid waste management outside the scheme will be responsibility of

proponent is not clearly spelt out.

14. Justify one stair case is sufficient and no other stair case is required separately

for fire fighting.

15. Astonia plant is to be added.

16. 100% solar energy in common ares to be provided.

17. Reflecting paints on roof top and side walls to be provided.

18. All side green plantations as not shown on east side.

19. Revised permission from the NOIDA authority regarding the increased FAR

with the approved maps should be submitted.

20. Parking plans, stilt plan and landscape plans have been provided but not

signed by the Architect.

The project proponent submitted their replies through letter dated 16/01/2015 and

04/02/2015. The committee discussed the replies and recommended grant of environmental

clearance on the project details as given at Para-A alongwith general conditions as prescribed

by Authority for construction project and following specific conditions:




Minutes of 207th


of 33




of treated water.



users. 5. Environmental Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan along with budgetary provision

amounting to Rs. 3.60 crore of total project cost shall be prepared and approved by Board of Directors of the company. A copy of resolution as above shall be submitted to

the authority. 6. Isolated place for Municipal Solid Waste handling and the disposal shall be provided in

accordance with Municipal Solid Waste (Management and Handling Rules), 2000 (as amended).

7. Organic waste converter for solid waste management shall be installed and plan

submitted.



9. Parking guideline as per Development Authority should be followed. Parking for

disabled persons should be explored.





only from the roof top. RWH from green and other open areas shall be done only after





17. Protection shall be provided on the windows of the high rise flats for security of residents.




20. Unless and until all the environmental issues are sorted out the occupancy will be

restricted and would be only allowed after achieving the Permission from the competent

authority.





23. Sprinkler to be used for curing and quenching and ready mix concrete may be used for

construction.




Minutes of 207th


of 33

Para-A: Project details:

1. The environmental clearance is sought for Group Housing Project at Plot No-SC-

01/B-1, Sector-79, Noida, U.P. M/s Sequel Building Concepts Pvt. Ltd.

2. Area details of the project is as follows:

Items Details Percentage

Total Plot area 24,000 sq mt (5.93 acres) 100%

Ground Coverage Permissible: 9,600 sq mt (40%)

Proposed: 4,801.68 sq mt (20.007%)

40%

20.007%

FAR for Housing Permissible: 66,000.00 (@ 2.75)

Proposed: 64,513.26 (@2.69)

275%

269%

FAR for Convenient Shopping Permissible: 659.80 sq mt

Proposed: 659.80 sq mt

2.75%

2.75%

FAR for Community Hall 800 sq mt 3.33%

Total FAR achieved 65,973.06 sq mt (2.749) 274.9%

Area for facility 9,890.24 sq mt 41.21%

Total Basement area 20,407.41 sq mt

Total Podium area 9,866.59 sq mt

Total Stilt area 3,536.52 sq mt

Total Built up area 1,09,673.82 sq mt

Total open area 19,198.32 sq mt 80%

Green Area Required: 9,599.16 sq mt (50% of open area)

Proposed: 10,227.76 sq mt (53.3% of open area)

40%

42.62%

No. of Trees Required: 192 Trees

Proposed: 192 Trees

Total Dwelling Units 546

Estimated Population Residential – 2,457 (@ 4.5 person per unit)

Floating - 250

Staff- 150

Convenient Shopping- 70

Area utilization 6 Towers

Basement+stilt+23 Floors

Maximum Height Approx 72 m


Total units planned 546

Parking Required (includes

Parking provided visitors

parking)

908 ECS

913 ECS

Power requirement& source Power requirement: 4000 KVA from U.P State Electricity Board(UPSEB).

Power backup (DG Sets) 3 DG sets having capacity 1000 KVA each and 1 DG Set of capacity 500

KVA. Total 3500 KVA

Water requirement & source Fresh water: 168 KLD (Municipal Water supply)

Reuse of treated effluent from STP: 94 KLD

Total water requirement: 262 KLD

Sewage treatment & disposal The waste water generated from entire complex is 204 KLD, which will

be treated in the STP of 250 KLD capacity at site. 105 KLD wastewater

will be treated up to tertiary level for reuses in the complex like toilet

flushing, cooling of DG sets and horticulture purposes. Rest of Secondary

treated water is discharged into Municipal sewer.

Total solid waste generated Approximately 1330 Kg/ day – Municipal solid waste including

Minutes of 207th


of 33

horticultural waste will be generated, segregated and disposed as per

MSW Rules, 2000 through hired agency for Handling & disposal of solid

waste.

Rain water harvesting pits 08 nos.

4. Water details of the project are as follows:

S.

N

o.

Description unit/Area

(in m2

)

Total

Occupancy

Rate of water

demand (lpcd)

Total

Fresh

Water

(KD)

Total

Flushing/

Recycled

water

(KLD)

Total

Water

Requireme

nt (KLD)

1. Residential 546 unit 2457 Fresh Water @

65 LPCD

Flushing Water

@ 21 LPCD

160 52 212

2. Staff 5% of

total

population

150 Fresh Water @

30 LPCD

Flushing Water

@ 15 LPCD

4.5 2.3 6.8

3. Visitors 10% of

total

population

250 Fresh Water @

5 LPCD

Flushing Water

@ 10 LPCD

1.25 2.5 3.75

4. Convenient

shopping

Staff

1 person

/10 sqm

(659.80 sqm)

70 Fresh Water @

30 LPCD

Flushing Water @ 15 LPCD

2.1 1.0 3.1

Total Domestic water 167.85

Say~ 168

57.8

Say ~ 58

~ 226

Horticulture

and

Landscape

development

10,227.76

sqm

1 l/sqm 11 11

Cooling

water for

DG sets

3500

KVA

0.9 l/KVA/Hr 25 25

Grand Total (A+B) = 262 KLD

Fresh water 168 KLD

Flushing 58 KLD

Horticulture /

Landscape

11 KLD

DG set cooling 25 KLD

Total water

requirement

262 KLD

Waste water 204 KLD

Source of water - Municipal Water Supply

STP Capacity – 250 KLD (20 % extra for future expansion)


S.No. Particulars Population Waste generated in kg/day

1. Residential (@0.5kg/day) 2457 1228

2. Visitors (@0.15kg/day) 250 38

3. Staff (@ 0.15kg/day) 150 23

Total Solid waste generated Approx. 1289 kg/day

Horticulture Waste (@ .0037/sq/day) 40 Kg/Day

E-Waste (0.15 kg/C/Yr) < 1 Kg/Day

STP Sludge 40 Kg


amended.

Minutes of 207th


of 33

20- Group Housing Project at Plot No-3, Sector-12, Vrindavan Yojna-3, Lucknow Sri

Rajendra Kr Sharma, Project Director, Flat No- 501, Tulip Apartment, 8-B, Ashok

Marg, Lucknow. File No. 2175/DD-Y


13/12/2014 wherein the project proponent was directed as follows:

"Shri Rajendra Kumar Sharma, project proponent submitted their replies through

letter dated 20/10/2014 through which they have submitted approved map from housing

board, structural design, services plans, area details, Govt. provisions related to EWS/LIG

housing, provision for overhead tank for firefighting with 10 KLD capacities and plan for

CSR. They have also submitted that nearest water body to the project site is River Gomti,

which lies at a distance of around 8.2 KM in north-east direction hence, the site is not flood

prone. The committee discussed the replies and observed that the financial commitment with

regard to the recurring cost of the STP and other EMP'S is not provided the CSR proposal

seems to be not realistic it should be supplemented by the budgetary provision certified by

the proponent in its financial report. The proposal under the head infrastructure development

seems to be vague and needs further elaboration. The green area as proposed is 7-8% and it

may be increased to 15% and accordingly the revised proposal may be submitted, further the

water consumption should also be revised considering the MOEF Guidelines.

The committee also directed to submit following:

• Copy letter through which the amount deposited in Housing Board in lieu of

LIG and EWS houses not to be constructed be submitted within three days to

office."

The project proponent submitted their replies through letter dated 20/01/2015. The

committee discussed the replies and recommended grant of environmental clearance on the

project details as given at Para-A along with general conditions as prescribed by Authority

for construction project and following specific conditions:







of treated water.



users.

5. Environmental Corporate Responsibility (ECR) plan along with budgetary provision amounting to 2% of total project cost shall be prepared and approved by Board of

Directors of the company. A copy of resolution as above shall be submitted to the authority. 50% of tube wells proposed under CSR plan should be solar driven.

Minutes of 207th


of 33

6. Isolated place for Municipal Solid Waste handling and the disposal shall be provided in

accordance with Municipal Solid Waste (Management and Handling Rules), 2000 (as

amended).

7. Organic waste converter for solid waste management shall be installed and plan

submitted.


provided in the common areas/common stairs. 9. Parking guideline as per Lucknow Development Authority should be followed. Parking

for disabled persons should be explored. 10. All entry/exit point should be bell mouth shaped.

11. To discharge excess treated waste water into public drainage system, permission from the competent authority to be taken prior to any discharge.

12. 100 % provision of Rain Water Harvesting is to be made. RWH shall be initially done only from the roof top. RWH from green and other open areas shall be done only after


13. Height of the stack should be provided as discussed based on combined DG sets

capacity and be 6mt higher than the tallest building.

14. Post project monitoring for air, water (surface+ ground), Stack noise of D.G. sets, STP

to be carried out as CPCB Guidelines.

15. Crèche to be provided during the construction/operation phase.

16. Provision of separate room for senior citizen with proper amenities shall be made.

17. Protection shall be provided on the windows of the high rise flats for security of

residents.




20. Unless and until all the environmental issues are sorted out the occupancy will be restricted and would be only allowed after achieving the Permission from the competent

authority. 21. The project proponent shall ensure that the project site does not attract/infringe any

buffer zone of no activity identified/declared under law. 22. Ground water should not be extracted for the purpose of construction or otherwise. In

case of default the Environmental Clearance will deem to be cancelled. 23. Sprinkler to be used for curing and quenching and ready mix concrete may be used for

construction.

24. Possibilities of use of treated waste water for irrigation purposes should be explored.

25. No fresh water will be used for irrigation purpose.

26. Mobile toilets, safe drinking water facility, sanitation facility and eco friendly fuels etc.

Shall be made available to the temporary residents/workers at the project site including


Para-A: Project details:

1. The environmental clearance is sought for proposed Group Housing Project at Plot

No-3, Sector-12, Vrindavan Yojna-3, Lucknow, U.P. M/s Amazing Construction Pvt.

Ltd.

2. Salient features of the project is as follows:

Features Proposed Project

Total Plot Area 8425.50 sq. m

Permissible FAR@ 3.32 % 28014.79 sq. m.

Minutes of 207th


of 33

Achieved FAR@ 3.09 % 26065.802 sq. m.

Height of Building 36 mt

Green Area 579.34 sq. m.

No. of Towers 6

No. of Floors Block A1 - Stilt+ 9 Floor + Duplex

Block A2 - Stilt+ 9 Floor + Duplex

Block B1- Stilt+ 9 Floor

Block B2- Stilt+ 9 Floor

Block C- Stilt+ 9 Floor + Duplex

Utility Block- Stilt+ 4 Floors.

Total Built up Area 26065.802 sq. m

Estimated Population 960

Total Water Requirement 126 KLD

Fresh Water Requirement 60 KLD

Treated Waste Water use from STP 66 KLD

STP Capacity 140 KLD

Parking 392 ECS

Total Solid Waste Generation 594.4 kg/day

Power requirement and source 1100 KW (UPSEB)

Backup Power Supply 02 nos. of DG Sets (2x 500 KVA &1 x 250 KVA)

3. The project proposals are covered under category 8”a” of EIA Notification, 2006.

21- Proposed 227.40 acre OPUS Integrated Township near Ghaziabad. Mr. A

Raghunath,General Manager, H-87, Ist Floor, Sector-63, NOIDA. File No.

1312/DD-Y

The committee noted that environmental clearance was recommended for the project

proposals in SEAC meeting dated 16/07/2014 however, the SEIAA in its meeting dated

03/12/2014 observed as follows and referred the matter back to the committee:

"The SEIAA noted that in its meeting dated 12-08-2014 the SEIAA seeked some

information from the project proponent which were communicated to the project

Proponent vide letter no- 1265/praya/1332/SEAC/2012/DDY dated 02-09-2014. In

this regard the project proponent has submitted his reply through his letter dated 18-

09-214. The project proponent letter dated 18-09-2014 was put up and discussed in

the SEIAA meeting. The SEIAA observed that the information submitted by the

project proponent is very short and not clear. The SEIAA, therefore, directed the

President/senior person of the proposed project to present in the next SEIAA meeting

to explain the quires of the SEIAA."

The committee directed the proponent to make a presentation on the issues raised by

SEIAA in its meeting dated 03/12/2014. The project proponent informed that there is a water

body/lake outside the boundary of the project. Neither any water discharge is being made to

this water body nor any water intake is proposed from the same. This water body is

completely outside of the project boundary. Minimum distance of this water body from the

nearest point of project boundary is 28-30 m. Apart from this, it is also not any notified water

body.

Minutes of 207th


of 33

The committee discussed the matter in light of observations of SEIAA and reply

submitted by the project proponent and directed the proponent to submit land details of said

water body alongwith its ownership status. It is also desirable to get a NOC from the owner

of the water body.


(Dr. M. S. Khan)

Chairman, SEAC,UP

(Shri S. C. Brahmachari)

Member, SEAC, UP

(Dr. Asheesh Kumar Singh)

Member, SEAC, UP

(Dr. S.N. Singh)

Member, SEAC, UP

(Dr. S.K. Upadhayay)

Member, SEAC, UP

(Dr. D. C. Gupta)

Member, SEAC, UP

(Shri Sanjay Kumar)

I.A.S.

Secretary, SEAC, UP

Minutes of 207th - seiaaup.inseiaaup.in/Uploads/MeetingMinutePdfs/20150313044213PM.pdfMinutes of...

Documents

Transcript of Minutes of 207th - seiaaup.inseiaaup.in/Uploads/MeetingMinutePdfs/20150313044213PM.pdfMinutes of...