MINUTE REM r5 This Calendar Item No • .b­

wos approved cs Minute Item No. f5 by the State t.ancb

mmlsslon by a v~e ~....J..._ o ot its _ !Jw2. Z,'!l,

meeting.

A 7

s 1

CALENDAR ITEM

15 09/27/89 PRC 3659 Garibay

TERMINATION OF REC~EATIONAL PIER RERMIT AND APPROVAL OF A GENERAL PERMIT - RECREATIONAL USE

APPLICANT: Craig T. McFarland P. 0. Box 1150 Carmel, California 93921

AREA, TYPE LAND AND LOCATION:

LAND USE:

A 0.146-acre parcel of submerged land in Lake Tahoe near Brockway, Placer County.

Continued use and maintenance of an existing pier and boathouse and partial reconstruction of pier and total reconstruction of boathouse.

TERMS OF PROPOSED PERMIT: Initial period: Five-years beginning

September 27, 1989.

Public liability insurance: Combined single limit coverage of $300,000.

CONSIDERATION: $1,270.40 per annum.

BASIS FOR CONSIDERATION: Pursuant to 2 Cal. Cade Regs. 2003.

APPLICANT STATUS: Applicant is owner of upland.

PREREQUISITE CONDITIONS, FEES AND EXPENSES: Filing fee has been received.

-1-

CALENDAR ITEM NO. 1 5 (CONT'D)

STATUTORY AND OTHER REFERENCES:

AB 884:

A. P.R.C.: Div. 6, Parts 1, and 2; Div. 13.

B. Cal. Code Regs.: Title 2, Div. 3; Title 14, Div. 6.

06/05/90.

OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION: 1. As to the termination of th~ existing

Recreational Pier Permit, pursuant to the Commission's delegation of authority and the State CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15061), the staff has determined that this activity is exempt from the ~equirements of the CEQA because the activity is not a "project" as defined by CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines.

Authority: P.R.C. 21065 and 14 Cal. Code Regs. 15378.

2. As to the isssuance of the new permit for ~he existing pier, pursuant to the Commission's delegation of author~ty and the State CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15061), the staff has determined that this activity is exempt from the requirements of the CEQA a~ a categorically exempt project. The project is exempt under Class l, Existing Facility, 2 Cal. Code Regs 2905(a)(2}.

Authority: P.R.C. 21084, 14 Cal. Code Regs. 15300, and 2 Cal. Code Regs. 2905.

3. As to the partial reconstruction of the pier and reconstruction of the boathouse, pursuant to the Commission's delegation of authority ~~d the State CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15025), the staff has prepared a Proposed Negative Declaration identified as EIR ND 477, State Clearinghouse No. 89052217. Such Proposed Negative Declaration was prepared and circulated for public reuiew pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.

-2-

CALENDAR ITEM NO. 15 (CONT'D}_

Based upon the Initial Study, the Proposed Negative Declaration, and the comments received in response thereto, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. ( 14 Cal. Code Regs. 15074(b))

4. The Applicant has adjusted his property boundary lines and no longer qualifies for the rent free status.

5. In lieu of total reconstruction, the Applicant proposes to reconstruct only that portion of the pier and boathouse waterward of the low water mark (6,223' elevation). That portion of the pier located in the shorezone area shall remain as is. It has been determined that the portion of the pier wi·hin the shorezone area is in a safe and ser· r.eable condition and is not in need of r.onstruction at this time.

6. The work, ~ proposed, will be done from a barge that will be located in the lake. First, the existing sections of the pier to be replaced will be removed, placed on the barge, and hauled away. Once the barge is unloaded, the new materials to construct the new sections of the pier will be placed on the barge and taken to the construction site. The new portion of the pier and boathouse will be constructed entirely from the barge with a crane and a pile driver that are located on the floatin~ platform.

7. Materials will be neither stored or placed, nor will any activity associated with construction be conducted above the low water line on the subject property. This will prevent any disturbance to what may be considered a Tahoe Yellow Cress (Rorippa) habitat.

8. The existing pier and boathouse are previously authorized structures.

-3-

CALENDAR ITEM NO. t..5-<CONT'D)

9. In order to determine the other potential trust uses in the area of the proposed project, the staff contacted representatives of the following agencies: TRPA, Department of Fish and Game, County of Placer, and the Tahoe Conservancy. No·;e of these agencies expressed a concern that the proposed project would have a significant effect on trust uses in the area. The agencies did not identify any trust needs which were not being met by existing facilities in the area. Identified trust uses in this area would include swimming, boating, walking along the beach, and views of the lake.

10. This property was physically inspected by staff for purposes of evaluQting the impact of the project on the public trust.

11. This activity involves lands identified as possessing significant enuironmental values pursuant to P.R.C. 6370, et seq. Based upon the staff's consultation with the persons' nominating such lands and through the CEQA reuiew process, it is the staff's opinion that the project, as proposed, is consistent with its use classification.

12. All permits covering structures in Lake Tahoe will include a condition subsequent that if any structure authorized is found to be in nonconformance with the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency 1 s shorezone ordinance, and if any alterations, repairs, or removal required pursuant t.o said ordinance are not accomplished within the designated time period, then the permit will be automatically terminated, effective upon notice by the State, and the site shall be cleared pursuant to the terms thereof.

13. All permits issued at Lake Tahoe include special language in which the permittee/lessee agrees to protect and replace or restore, if required, the

-4·-

· ·-· -~·-·-· -·1-Jta--....., • • ' J ... ~ "t ! J.·, ... :. ~, u r .. ,-::s;;.

CALENDAR ITEM NO. 15 (CONT'D)

habitat of Rorippa subumbellata, commonly called the Tahoe Yellow Cress, a State-listed endangered plant species.

APPROVALS OBTAINED: Placer County, Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, California Department of Fish and Game, and Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board.

FURTHER APPROVALS REQUIRED: United States Army Corps of Engineers.

EXHIBITS: A. Site Map. B. Location Map. C. Placer County Letter of Approval. D. Negative Declaration.

IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE COMMISSION:

1. AS TO THE TERMINATION OF THE EXISTING RECREATIONAL PIER PERMIT, FIND THAT THE ACTIVITY IS EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CEQA PURSUANT TO 14 CAL. CODE REGS. 1S061 BECAUSE THE ACTIVITY IS NOT A PROJECT AS DEFINED BY P.R.C. 21065 AND 14 CAL. CODE REGS. 15378.

2. AS TO THE ISSUANCE OF A NEW PERMIT FOR THE EXISTING PIER, FIND THAT THE ACTIVITY IS EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CEQA PURSUANT TO 14 CAL. CODE REGS. 15061 AS A CATEGORICALLY EXEMP,T PROJECT, CLASS l, EXISTING FACILITY, 2 CAL. CODE REGS. 290S(a){2).

3. AS TO THE PARTIAL RECONSTRUCTION OF THE PIER AND RECONSTRUCTION OF THE BOATHOUSE, CERTIFY THAT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION, EIR ND 477, STATE CLEARINGHOUQ~ NO. 89052217, WAS PREPARED FOR THIS PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE CEQA AND THAT THE COMMISSION HAS REVIEWED AND CONSIDERED THE INFORMATION CONTAINED THEREIN.

4. DETERMINE THAT THE PROJECT (PARTIAL RECONSTRUCTION OF THE PIER AND RECONSTRUCTION OF THE BOATHOUSE}, AS APPROVED, WILL NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT.

S. TERMINATE THE RECREATIONAL PIER PERMIT NO. PRC 3659, EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 26, 1989.

-5-

' '

cnLENDAR ITEM NO. 15 ccmH~o)

6. AUTHORIZE ISSUANCE TO CRAIG T. MCFARLAND OF A FIUE-YEAR GENERAL PERMIT - RECREATIONAL USE, aEGINNING SEPTEMB£R 27, 1989; FOR THE PARTIAL RECONSTRUCTION Or AN EXISTING PIER AND RECONSTRUCTION OF AN EXISTING BOATHOUSE ON THE LAND DESCRIBED ON EXHIBIT 11 A11 ATTACHED AND BY REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF.

-6-

-\ ..

-· '

___ JI . -

~t:. . ~t

~I'; 'c:·-1--._,,. - --·-~"""'-.1.-.. ,.IC --1J-; :_-ri '~""·~· - ~ ~~ • p r . "' "t, •NJ llo t'JORJ, il.OPoSc.O l'C&.w ~ l) M11i" • •

' ;:: J..A,.,PWt.fl.O fJF J..ow i.JATl!l:1...1,.;£ ~ ~~ . ~.: PLAN SC'Al.£.·1"'•za• 4~1/'flAIJPEA' .; t•.111·~·MJt10 Pll.IAJ&s

f AS SA'db'NJ -·

. -'#li~F ZOAIF Tdl.E~ARlrtI DISTINCT: 6 t.AIJO CAPAS/I.ITV OIST/t'/.c'F> IPIF /le

ADJO/l//J.IC PHDPcqr1e-s: NIJ~TNtArN 90-2a2-01 .r"urn: Al'u ft1•2111 .. 1s O..ttCI: Ar'L.,~11 ..

.. ·-·

Cl Ill

:1

····-·

. !

·s•i.5• ·Y.700~N .JVPl'Olfr P/lllJCS rA3 '11/0YllJ

..-........_...a.

\0 ....... ... .... .......

~ l:toar10N tYAP.,, ~-- :"'

C"RIJJS N.fTeHIA.!C 1410/CArt' A'IJCK CRIB

en ""' rt t%1 CD ~

H b:I

f ::J 'O

>

I~~ .. HJ!// /1£.(A'Fl,. 't!U

. . ~'"4!'-MJtJo •. ' _., • - --..__ l'l/./llC . '

.. ; . ; L_)o· ;.(_'">¢; . ,.. II' II' - -~·-·-NNN l·:: . . ( . ..:. ·- . "-·;1111-·-·-··· . ·1

• I t:..J1- m ·-·-·- ·-·-·- -• . ' . ..... ,. .•. . "'"' ... !··~ .. I r.- ..... , .... -·-- ·-·-··-· .-·-···"·- . ' :.,, .... ' .. --. .. ,,,, .. ,..,... 1·. - -. -. - ...... _

' ·--.,._--. ~. . . ---- ...... '" I ""'~rto a11u1orv · '-. ... '· • • • _ --~·:.· -----------;. "/ I ''"'"'""~ "'"n•11Klll'l'r1"tffl111v .rJ11n·n1on11,,../ fi< .. rlJcK, . .,~s---r;;,,OPOSED PIER Rf.PAIR

l

rvJ ~ ~II t:ouc. 'O<JrtNG l'TYP. l~RJj"')Jffi~ - I rr\; • ~ ' ,,,,,,,, •• ,,, .. A3 .W#WN) 1 A.P.AI. fO·~az. l!I, VIJ•2tJ 2. 0 II

;. ~ - ' - 11.f'iJCKWAY AK<FA PUU.< <own " --, ·1\ P.f' 0 F/l,£ NU!r/Z:.) l'Klfl: 8t:AU< I"•'"'' ~ £NGIN1:<!11~~~<::_ . n "", ~~U ~~ 1; '.''.~ .. • . .

~ (")

w °' \JI

"° • \D

• ~I • , , • '

~ ~

~ lU UJ

IO r--

0: 0:

Tl6N

lU UJ

ID r--

0: a:

Sunnyside

T 15 N

Homewood

UJ UJ

ID I'

EXHIBIT "B" a: o:

PRC 3659.9 T 14N

lake Forest

\

Tahoe Vista

UJ UJ

" co 0:

fil I B I i B II I I

LAKE: e

TA H o:E 111

D D I

Placer i~ounty II .... -. ..... ., ... ~ El Dorado ·eounty I&

g I I!! B ! II u I

'~ ~~ ~~

~~

.-··----""f-f~~--

1. f!·~•.r,:;-.·tt P'·"'E -~, ....... ,,.,,, t...:

I r.r~ur~ Pl~·~: '. ' ,..,-•

<

EXHIBIT "C"

PLACER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

OPERATING DIVISION

A4m1nsi1r11~n

En91nttt•"9 EQu1pment M11n1e-nance Aoao M'1n1en1nce Spec1.al D1strtCts

Surw-,0119 Transp0tt.at1on

Judy Ludlow California State Lands Commission 1807 - 13th Street Sacramento, CA 95814

RE: PIER - SHOREZONE CONSTRUCTION

JACK WARREN, Director JAN WITIER. Assistant Director LARRY ODDO, Deputy Director

ALAN RO'/, Deputy Director

Ma r ch 3 , 198 9

The County of Placer has reviewed the below referenced requests for construction activities within the Shorezone of Lake Tahoe. We have no objection to the construction actiyities described in the belo~ applications contingent upon approval by your office.

1. E.S. Bertagnolli PRC 3209.9 2e Charlotte and Robert An-gel! w 24144 3. Sweet/Avanessi?n PRC 5022 4. Wickland PRC 3599 5. . Lyons/Hawkins WP 5884 6. Mein - 83-162-28 PRC 6714

Mein - 83-162-31 ·W 241 4

9. WP 3652 10. Crabtree w 21445 11. English w 1124.38 12. Wallis PRC 4314 13. Metas w 24103 14. Barrow PRC 7167.9 15. Nahas PRC 4066 16. Hicks w 21665

Should you have any questions or if I can be qf further assis­tance, please call at your convenience.

WORKS

" t Jt ••' I

~ .. · .. =·

.,"._. :.~: -~-~-1-s3·~--.. · · - l'li~ r. 7,-

1144.c B ~l!nut I PM'tlttCen~r I AIJ!icNn. fltllllomla 95603 I (910) 823-44~1 • . - r· j) ~· t::.!'i: ·-· ......-- ...... ,., ..........

STATE OF CALIFORNIA-STATE LANDS COMMISSION

STATE LANDS COMMISSION 1807 13TH STREET . SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95814 _ EXHIBIT D

PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION

Project Title: McFARLAND PIER & BOATHOUSE RECONSTRUCTION

Project Proponent: Craig T. McFarland

EIR ND 477

File Ref.: PRC 3659

SCH#:

Project Location: In Lake Tahoe adjacent to Lot 10, Block E, Lakevista Subdivision, approximately l mile east of Kings Beach, ~lacer County.

Project Description: Reconstruction of an existtng pter and boathouse.

Contact Person: TED T. FUKUSHIMA Telephone: (916)322-7813

This document is prepared pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (Section 21000 et seq., Public Resources Code), the State CEQA Guidelines (Sec­tion 15000 et seq., Title 14, California Code Regulations), and the State Lands Commission regulations (Section 2901 et seq., Title 2, Cal?fornia Code Regulations).

Based upon the attached Initial Study, it has been found that:

~ the project will not have a significcnt effect on the environment.

i::]" mitigation measures included in the project will avoid potentially significant effe

(·. ___ _:_~-----

.·

I\;

:! "' ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ I I ~ l~· f I '· ~ ~

S1 ·-

.._..__ ____ -

If RI 7• ~ 'L A: Q) /IC'! .. PIEA'IJI 145'.f , • PllRO-.JOO'I

·.-. :._) ""

-: ... ~ :. ,• -- ';-:? .... ~-·~ ~·- . • ',· ... • •• ··~ _..ati.J ........... ~~

.~~ ..cj. yr

I". ,1•

' . .

fBOJECT NAF.RATIV~

Mr. craiq McFarland is proposing to repair an existinq rock crib pier and boathouse with wood members and replace a 2" x 61

: min. ced~r deck around the existing boathouse. Wooden support pilings will be used. No increase in coverage or modifications to existing pier and boathouse will result (see submittal drawing).

The pier is located adjacent to Placer County APNs 90-282-1? and 90-282-08 on the North Shore of Lake Tahoe.

CONpTBUCTION HETHOP

Reconstruction of existinq pier and boathouse ;,s to be by barge: caissons or sleeves •.Jill be useci when sediment is resuspended .. Anchorage of the barge will be to the existing structure and/or anchors as . .required for adequate stabilization of barge on the lake~ All construction wastes will be collected onto the barge and/or onshore dumpsters and disposed at the nearest dumpster/sanitary landfill site. Small boats (John boats) and tarps will be utilized under construction areas to provide for the collection of construction debris, thereby preventinq any discharge of wastes to the lake.

------ --- --- .. __....__.._..,_. _ __,,,,......_ _____ --...-.-- --

CALEf\DfSI PAGE

. . '. . .

.. .

• , . ; •

..

••' .... .,.· . • , ... STATE LANDS COMMISSION

(·-. . Date Filed:-.---'---"'---

PRC 3659 File Ref.: ______ _

eN~iRoN'Me~r~~: ;~~Aci- P.~ ,-~~MeN~ ~~~M ·_ P~r~ 1 (To be completed by applicant) FORM 69.3111/821 •

.. •' . .. . A. GENERAL INFORMATION

•,

1. Name, addreu, and telephone number:

a. Applicant b. Contact person if other than a1:>plicant:

Craig T. McFarland _Gregg R. Lien

P.O. Box 1150 P.O. Box 7740

Carmel, CA 93921 Tahoe City, Ca. 95730

~' 408 ) 625-1874 1916 ' 583-8542

2. a. Project location: (Please reference to nearest town or community and include countY)

Placer County, Lot 10, Blk Ee Lakevista Subdivision,

Section POR N~ Lot 3c 30, T 16N, ~ 18E, MDBM . : . Approx. 1 mile east of Kings Beach

~ . ::: . b. Assessor's parcel number: __ 9_0_-_2_8_2_-_0_8_.& __ l_S ____________________ _

3. Existing zoning of project site: __ ""r..o:.=-w.._.n .. e_n_s=i..;::t""'y--=Ro:.:e,_s::;;i:::.d=e:..rt..,t~i-a=-1=--------·--------­

~ ·ex~~ng~ndure~~aj~;~~:~~R~e~c~r~e~a~t~·;i~o~~~~~l~P~1~·~~r-·-~~--~--·-·------~-----5. Proposed use of site: _____ _,R:.:;e::.c=r-=e:.:a:..:t:.::i:.::o::.:n:.:.;a=l...::.P.::i:.::e::.:::r.__ _______________ _

----·-- ~----------_., _____ .....__ .. ___ ~.. ... . ........

6. Other permits required:_ Tabc,e Beaional Planning Agency_, Lahontan }'tater Quality .. ' . . .

Control Board. n. s. Army Ccu:vS of Engineers. Dept. of Fish & G~e, " . . .. '

Placer County •.

B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

.. ...

1. For building construction projects,c0mplute "ATTACHMENT A".

..

. . ' .

2. For non-building construction proJects: Describe fullr the propose,i activity, Its purp.;no and Intended use, e.g. fer proposed min ual prospecting permits, include tt.e number of test holes, size <'If holes, amount of material to b0 excavated, maximum sun't ce area of disturbance, holo loc.itions, depth or hohn, etc. Attach plans or other drawings as ,nacemry. :- ::. ..

r~ENO.\R PAGE .-1 S::'l -r~.;.~" ~UT£ PACa . ::3·3 9 {)'.'~}~:

• ... ' . "\'.. .

C. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING

1. Describe the project site as it exists before the proJect, including information on topography,,soll stability, pl11nts and ~nr4 and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Ooscribe any existing structUros on the site, and tht use of the structures.

2. Describe the surrounding properties, including Information on plants and animals Md any cultural, h~torlcal, or sconic asp.cu. indicate the type of land U!e (resid!ntiel, commercial, etc.), !nteiuitY of b~d u:e {CM fe:nily, c;>:rtm:nt hcu:a;, $hc;p;, d;p;rt­ment stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set-back, rear yard, etc.).

D. ENVIRONMENTAL iMPACT ASSESSMEtiT

Answer \lie following questions by placi~ a check In the opproprizto box. Discuss all itoms checktd "yes" or "maybe". (Attach additional sheets as necessary)

Will the project involve:

1. a change in existing features :>f any bay~, tidelands, beaches, lakes, c;r hills, or substantial alteration •••••••• of ground contours?

2. a chanip in scenic views er vistas from existing residential arear or public lands or roads? , , , • , • , , •••••••

3. a chang! in pattern, scale, or charieter of the general area of projact7 ••••••••••••••••••••• , .•• , •.••

4. a significant effect on plant or animal life? • ...•••••••.•••••••••.•••••••••••••••••••••••.

5. significant arr:-..ounts of solid waste or litter7 .•.•.•••••••••••••••• ·' •••••••••••••• ~ •••••••••

6. a change in dust, ash, smoke, fu~. or odors in tha vicinity? •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• : •••

7. a change in ocean, bay, lake, stream, or ground wanr quality or quantity, or alteration ••••••••••.•••••• of existing drainage patterns? ·

VES MA VBE NO

0 0 ~

D El [i]

n D ~ 0 D fX]

0 D lXl

0 0 -0 D £X1

8. :i change in existing noise o: vibration levels in the vicinity? ••••••••••• ~ ; : · ••••••••••••••••••••• · 0 D liJ

9. construction on filled land or on $lope of 10 percent or morn? ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• '. • · •• . . .

10. use OI" disposal of potentially hazardous material$, such as toxic or radioactivo ••••••••• ~ •••••••••••• substances, flammables, Qr explosives? ·

11. a change in demand for municipal servlC4S (police, fire, water, uwagr, otc.)7-•• -. ~ ••• -. ••• -.-;.; • .-. -;. ••• ; . .

12. an increase in follis fuel consumption (tlectricity, oil, natural gu, etc.)? • , ~ • ; ••••••••• : • •••••••••• . .. 13. a larger project or a series of projecti7 • ••.••••.• , .......... ~ ••.•••• : • ·• · •••••• , ••••••• .., ••••

E. CERTIFICATION .. . . ...

0 ·o 129 . - - -0 ·o. lfil

0 p ~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 IB.1

. . I hereby certify that the statements furnished above &nd In the attachr.:J exhibits Prat~":~ th• data anu lnf0tm1tlon rt·

quired for this initial evaluation to the bast ot my abll;ty, and that the hcts, statemtnU, Md Information p11sontad are true

::.~I.iiJJ:f ~u.1. Jr 'S "'iP<r "-.. ·-

' . . . ~ ' •• STAT~ LANDS COMMISSION ( .(· ..

~ ... ... ~ ..

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST - PART II Fila Ref.: PRC 3659 f'Mm 13.20 (7 /42) -· •

I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION

A. Applicant: _ __.c .... ·r .... a .... i_.a_T.._ ......... M .... c, .... F .... a .... rl ... a .... n ... d __________________________ _

P.O. Box 1150 Cannel, CA 93921

a. Checklist Date: 5 I 25 I 89

c. Contact Person: TED T. FUKUSHIMA Telephone: Lfil' _i. _32_2_-_7_8_1_3 ____ _

o. Purpose:-- ·ro rec\.·nstrtic't existing facilities in order to avoid falling into a st.ate of disrepair.

E. Location: In Lake Tahoe adjacent to Lot 10, Block E1 Lu;'cevista Subdivision 1 approximately

1 mile east of Kings Bea~b, Placer County. F. Description: ____ T;.;:o~ro:::.e.;;.co;;;.;n.;.;:s;..;t;.;.r.;::u:.;;;c.;:;.t-'a;;;.;n.:-.;:e;;.:x_i;;;.s.;:;.t1.· l'1.-1gi.-/Oe.i.;e.:..r ... a:;.;n.-d __ b.-o_a.;;.th_o;;;.;u:.;;s ... e~.--------------

.., . - r= , ==-= n==

G. Persons Contacted=----------------------------------

.-...

- -- , ___________________ _ •

II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS. (Explain all "yes" and "maybe" ;inswen}

A. F.artlt. Will the proposal result in: YH Mayb6 No

1. Unstable eanh conditions or changes in geologic substructures? ••••••••••• , • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 0 ~ 2. Disruptions, displacements, l!ompar.tion, or over~vering of the soil? •.•• , • , ••• \ , • • • • • • • • • . • • • • 0 0 (K] 3. Change in topography or ground surfice relief featurts?. , • • • • • • . . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 0 ~ 4. The destruction, covering, or modifia tion of any unique geologic ur physical feiiturcs? • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 0 fK] 5. Any increase in wind or water e1·:>sion of s',,ls, either on or off tho site? •••••••••••••••• : • • • • • • • • 0 0 ~ 6. Changes in deposition or eros1c,n of be<::h sands, or cha~ in siltati:in, dtpcnition or~C!~ro~11~'o!!!n~w~h!.!!• 2l.Illi.ll~riMMlh:~

modify the channel of a river or stream or th~ bed of the ocean or any b<iy. inlet, or lak •1 ,..,,...~ b~ ••• _:;=;;..~:;-~:::-i • • Cl'.LC.IW. • ' • • > fl f.)o ,

7. Exposure! of all people! or tnOperty to geol:>g1c haza:d~ wch I.IS e;rthquakes, landslid ~ffi~1~~~cground .- - • • failure. or si'nilar :iazards?. • . • . . . . . • . • • • • • • . • . • • • • • • • . • . • • • • • • • • • • • ~.!. ~ ... ;":• .......

B. 1lir. Will the proposal result in: (: . 1. St!ilstantial air emm1ssions or deterioration of ambient air quality? ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

2. The creation of objectionable odors? .....•.•.•.•.••••••••• ". ••••••••••••• : •••••••••••

3. Alter<1t1on of air movement, moisture or tempP.,ature. o: any change tn climate, either locally or re;1onally?.

C. Wutc•r. Will t:ic proposal result in:

1. Changes in the currents, or the course or duecuon of water movements, in either muine or fresh waters? .•

2. Changes ir. absorption rates. drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? •••••••.•

3. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?. • . . . . . •...•.•.•••••.•••• : •••••••••.•.

4. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? ...••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

5. Oisrmuqe into surface Naters, or in any alteration of surface water quahtv, including but n-.lt limited to tP.mper;iture, dissolved c xygen or turbidity?. . . . . . . . . . . .•...•.•••••.••.•.•••••••••••

6. Alteration of the direct on or rate of flow of ground wJters> .•...•••••••••••••.•.••••••••••.

7. Change in the quantity of ground wa{ers, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through inter· ception of an aquifer by cuts er excavations? . . . . . . • •...•••••••••••.•.•.••••••••••••••

8. Subscanual reducuon in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplil?s? ••••••..••.

9. Exposure of people or property to water·related hazards such as flooding ar tidal waves? ••••••••.•••.

10. S1gnif1cant ch3nqe~ in the temperature. flow or chem1ca. cor.?ent of surface thermal springs? .•••••.••• .,

0. /'/0111 /.it-,.. Will the proposal re~ult in:

1. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, cro~. <1nd aquatic plants)? ••.•.••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.••••.••••••••••••••••..

2. Reduction of the numburs of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? •••••••• _ ••••••••.••.

3. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in .. 1. ~mer 10 the normal rerlenishment of existing . ) species ..•••...••.•••.••••.••..••••••.•.....•..•••••••••••••••••••.•••.••..

4. Reduction m acreage of any agricultural crop? ••.••.•••..•••••••••••••.••.•••••.•••••.•

E. A11i111al I.if~ Will the proposal result in:

1. Change m the diversity of species, or· numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish c:nd shellfish, benthic organisms. or insects)? .................................. .

2~ Reduction of the numbms of any unltlue. rare of endangere<tspec1es of animals? •••• " .•• : ••• : ••••. :'

3. Introduction of new sp1ic:1es of ammals into an area, or result n a barrier to the m1grat1on or movement of animals? .••..•••••••.•...•••••••....••••••••.••••••.•••• · • • • · • · • • • • • • • • • • ·

OD El Cl I"] []

lJ fl -l"l l "] [ • 1

. I

Ix! I. •

'x' I. ; I.•· 1Xi ;x1 I !

lJ !~! i ; l] [-i lXl

L I I lJ f "J I ·- l r·11·:

[] L . I ..i [

r1 r i (] 1-1

I] I" I

:x I •

IX' • I

Ix: l I

4. Detr.riorarion to existini1 fish or wildlife habitat? •.••.•••.••• : : •••• - •. ". :- ••• -:- ••• -. : • - [ -· ,-:-. :- ... · - _J . 'x1'. J.

F. N11i.1t'. Will thl! proposal reiult 111:

1. h~cre;ise 111 existing nois.i levels? •••••...••••..•••••••••••••.•.•••••••••••••.•••••••

2. Exposure of people to sl!vere noise levul\? ...•...•.•••••••••••..••••••••••••••• : •••••.

G. l.~l(,/it u111/ Wurl'. Will the proposal result in:

1. The production of new light or glaru? .... . ........................................ . H. /.uml l'll'. Will the propos<1I result in:

LJ [xi f] l.:

1. i\ suhstantrdl alt11ration of the present or planned land use of an &1rea?. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • . I j I I. Nu111ra/ Uc•\lmrr~s. Will the proposal result in:

1. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? ••••••••••• , ••••••••••••••••••••••••••

2. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable resources? •••••••.•••••.•••• , •••••••••• '. ••••••

.. 2 ·-

[] ... , L:

n 1·:

: I•'

( (. , .·• ... .. . . .,. 41• '~··

• • 1 J. RAk t1f lip.wt. Docs the p1 :>posal result in: ...

. . . . ;·: , . '·1. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances {in.:luding. but not limited to. oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? •••••••. • ••••••••••••••••

2. Possibie interference with emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? •••••••••••••••

K. PnJ1u/111ion. Will the proposal result in:

1. The alteration, distribution, density, er growth rate of the human population of the area?

L. llotl.\inx. Will the proposal result in:

1. Affecting existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? •••••••••••••••••••••••••

M. Tran.~pnrtation/l'irculatinn. Will the proposal result in:

1. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

2. Affecting existing parl<ing facilities, or create a demand for new parking? ••••••••••••••••••••••••

3. Substantial imJ?aCt upon existing transportation systems? • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••••

4. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or mo•.-ement of people and/or good~? ••••••••••••••••

5. Alter<iti'!ns to '.Va~erborne, rail, or air traffic? ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

Vss Maybe No

D D lil DD~

0 O.l!I

DD IBJ .-

6. Increase in tn1ffic hazards to motc.r vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians? •••••••••••••••••••••••••

· N. P11hlil' St'n·i~s. Will the ptoposal have an effect upon, or r~ult in a need for new or altered governmental services in· <my of the- following areas:

DD~ DD~ D D !!I DD~ DD IBJ DD~

· · oo~ 1. Fire protection 7 •••••••••• : ••••.••••••••• M • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • .. ci 2. PoEce protection?. . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • D D ~ 3. Sch0\i1s1 • • • • • • • • • • . • ••••••••••••••••• • =...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D D ~ 4. Pdrks dnd other ret:<eational facilities?. . • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 0 ~ 5. Maintenance af public facilities, includin!; roads?. • • • . • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • D 0 fKJ 6. Otht:r governmental services?. • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • D 0 [Ki

0. f.'t1t'K)'. Will the proposal result in:

1. U;;e of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• -0 0 ~ - 2. Substan<1al increase Tn demand ~p0n ex1st1ng s~urces of energy, or require the develoi>Oient of new sources? • 0 · D 00

P. lftilitie.t. Will the proposal result in a need for·new systems, or substantial·alterations to the following ut1ht1es;

- 1. Power or naturar'gas? .•.•••••..•• -.- .. -•.•• -:-· •••.•.• · .•••• -: . -:-••• -••• -•••• : •••••••••••• ~--·- - __ .,.,. ·--~......... --:-- __ ,.._ ~ -.. - ~

2: Communication S'/Steins? .••••••••••••••• : ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

3. Water? . ...................................... · ... · · · · · · · • • • · • · · · · · • • • · · · · · ·

4. Sewer or septic tanks?

5. Storm water drainatJe? ••.••••••••••••••••••.•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

6. Solid waste and disposal? ••••••••••.••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

O. //mmm lleultlt. Will the J.)roposal result in:

D D [!] o·o ~ 0 0 [i] DD~ 0 D lR1 D D [R]

I. Creatmn of any health hazard or Potential he;lth hazard (exciuding mental health)? • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 0 ~ 2. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? •••••••••••••••••• • •••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 0 00 ·

R. 111'ltlie:ics. Will the proposal result in:

1. The obstruction of any scenic vuta or view open \O the public, or will the proposal mult in tht creation of an aesthetically offensive sit!! open to public view? ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

S. Rc>ereuti1111. Will the proposal result in:

·~

DD~

1. An impact upon the q~ahty or quantity of existing recrut1onal opportunities? •••••• • CALEND!..:i PlGE. ••• -D~~~IA.1,1 ... ·~·~ ; J· ('J (¥~·:

.. ..J,,}. •;:, \I l , ··"'• ._. ____ ..._~~~--

(-) . . . . " . ... T. Cu/1ura/ R.t's1mre~s.

( Ves Maybe No "

1. Will the proposal result in the alteration of .or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archeological site?.

2. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ~ •••••••••••••••••••••

D Cl

DD ~ r~-

:;, Does the proposal h;ive the potential to cause a physical change which would affect umqua ethnic cultural values? ••••••••.•••••.•••••.•. : •••.•••••••••••••••••••..••••••.•••••• • • • · • LJ f.. J !~]

4. Will the proposal restrict ex1st111g religious or sacr~ uses within the potential impact area? . • • • • • • • • . • • 0 LI l1C I U. !tlandat11f)' f"indi11gs oJSitnificanu.

1. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife po;:>ulat1on to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate ii plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare .or endangered plant or O (-I l~·-J anim<'ll or .eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? ••••..•.

2. =t~ ~:o.~.t .h~:~ ~h·e·~.t~~t'.a~ ~~ ~~~i~~e.s~~:t:t~~·.t~ .t~~ ~1~~.v~~t~:e. ~f.·~~~·~e~~: ~~.,~r~~~~~t.a'. D D r~ 3. Does the project have impacts which are individuall-,1 limited, but cumulatively cons1derablel • • • • • • • • • • 0 0 IKJ . . . 4. Does the project have environmental effeets which will cause substl)nt1al adv<!r!e effects on human beings,

either directly or indirectly? • . • • . • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • . • . • . • • • . • • • . • . • . • • • • • • • 0 0 ~ · Ill. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (Sae Comments Attached}

CS - There could be a slight rise in the turbidity level during the construction however, compliance with water quality control requirements should this impact to a minimum.

Fl - There could be a rise in the ambient noise levels during construction however, this should be of relatively short tenn duration.

IV. PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION

On tho basis of this initial evaluation:

r~l 1 find tho proposed pro1ect COULD NOT have a s1gn1f1cant effect on the environment, and a NCGATIVE DECLARATION.will ) be prepared.

[] I fmd th.-it although the proposed pro1ect could nave a s1gn,f1c.ant effect on the environmant, there will not t,e a ~1gn1f1c.ant effect in this case because the m1t1gat1on measures described on an attached she!t have been added to the pro1ect. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. . ·

I ] I f111d the proposed pro1er.t MAY have a s1gnif1cant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPOfjfj is requied.

Date: 5 / 2~ /_~9 .

.. , ' . . .. ' -.. . .. .. ( (· '\.·

:

TA.HOE REGIONAL PLANNING AGE?.'CY

i . ~:~~~U.S. Highway 50 Roi;nd Hill, Zephyr CQve, NV

P.O. Box 1038 Zephyr Cove, Nevada 89448-1038

(702) 583-4547'

S'\'A"n!MENT OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT

PROJECT NAME McFarland Boathouse/Pier Recair APN 90-282-08 and 15

PERMI1"l'EE (S) Crai9 HcFarl'"~

COUNTY/LOCATIOH Placer County, Terminous of Lake Street

Staff Analysis: In accordance with Article VI of the Tahoe Pegional Planning COl!lpact, as amended, and Section 6.3 of the 'l'RPA Rules and Regulations of Practice and Procedure, the TRPA staff has reviewed the information submitted with tl'1e subject project. On the hAsis of this initial environmental evalua­tion, Agency staff has found that the subject project will not have a signi­ficant effect on the e~1vironmento

Determination: Based' on the above-stated finding, the subject project is conditionally exempt from the requirement to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement. The conditions of this exemption are the conditions of permit approval.

J/-4-88 Date

·-

STATE OF CAllfOllNIA

CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD­LAHONTAN REGION 2092 I.AU TAHOE IOUlEVAlO P.O. llOX 9A21 SOUTH V.U TAHOE, CAUfOltNIA 9~131·2428

(115) 5"-3431

Mr. Craig T. McFarland P.O. Box 1150 Carmel, CA 93921

January 5, 1989

CONDITIONAL WAIVER OF WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROPOSED REPAIR OF AN EXISTING PIER AND BOATHOUSE ON LAKE TAHOE, BROCKWAY, PLACER COUNTY APN 90-282-15 AND 90-282-08

Dear Mr. Mcfarland:

We have received )nd reviewed your Report of Waste Discharge which describes your proposed project.

Based on the information submitted, it is not against the public interest to waive the adoption of Waste Discharge Requirements for this project, condit1ona1 upon the following:

!) Tahoe Regional Planning Agency's determination that the project is not subject to pier prohibitions specified in the Lake Tahoe Basin Water Quality Plan (208 Plan).

• < • " I• f, • • 0 • •

2) The disturbance of 1ake bed materials shall be kept to a minimum during constr.uct ion •.. Best pract i cab 1 e contro 1 teehno logy sha n be· - - -used to keep suspended earthen materials out of Lake Tahoe.

3) No petroleum products, construction wastes, litter, or earthen· materials shall enter any surface waters· in the l-ake-Tahoe Basin.· All construction waste products will be removed from the project site and dumped at a legal point of disposal. Any mechanical equipment operating within the lake will be cleaned and maintained prior to use.

4) The use of wood preservatives on wood in contact with the lake water is prohibited.

5} Regional Board staff shall be notified at least 48 hours prior to the start of the project.

6) Each pier owner is responsible for compliance with the waiver conditions and for ensuring that the project contractor is provided with a copy of these conditions.

Mr. Craig T. Mcfarland -2-

~ This waiver may be revoked and enforcement action taken upon the violation of any of the above conditions, creation of a water quality problem or variation from the plans submitted to this office. The expiration date of this waiver i~ October 15, 1989.

If you have any questions, please call Chris Stetler, Water Resource Control Engineer, or Hs. Ranny Eckstrom, Senior Water Resource Control Engineer, at this office.

Yours truly,

0~%dfi!U~ 0. R. BUTTERFIELD~ EXECUTIV~ OFFICER

cc: Tahoe Regional Planning Agency/ Jerry Wells California Department cf Fish and Game/ Ken Nilsson Placer County Public Works Dept. ~ State lands Commission/ Judy Ludlow U.S. Army Corps of EngineP.rs/ Robert June11 Hoffman, Lien, Faccinto and Spitzer/ Gregg Lien

,, • .,w ... ·---... 1 0 L·~

\ C.!:~·:::::: ~'.G~ · - __E_. ! • ,,.:,, o: • .. ~.-. 'J' J. f1 :i I .... ,.... ...... u ..... ~..,,....- ...... J ·--...-- . . .,. ... ,. ,