Mind/Body Dichotomy

27
Mind/Body Dichotomy Dialogue Education 2009 THIS CD HAS BEEN PRODUCED FOR TEACHERS TO USE IN THE CLASSROOM. IT IS A CONDITION OF THE USE OF THIS CD THAT IT BE USED ONLY BY THE PEOPLE FROM SCHOOLS THAT HAVE PURCHASED THE CD ROM FROM DIALOGUE EDUCATION. (THIS DOES NOT PROHIBIT ITS USE ON A SCHOOL’S INTRANET) 1

description

Dialogue Education 2009. Mind/Body Dichotomy. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Mind/Body Dichotomy

Page 1: Mind/Body Dichotomy

Mind/Body Dichotomy

Dialogue Education2009

THIS CD HAS BEEN PRODUCED FOR TEACHERS TO USE IN THE CLASSROOM. IT IS A CONDITION OF THE USE OF THIS CD THAT IT BE USED ONLY BY THE PEOPLE FROM SCHOOLS THAT HAVE PURCHASED THE CD ROM FROM

DIALOGUE EDUCATION. (THIS DOES NOT PROHIBIT ITS USE ON A SCHOOL’S INTRANET) 1

Page 2: Mind/Body Dichotomy

Contents Page 3 - Video Presentation on the Mind Body Question Pages 4 to5 - Defining the Mind Body issue Page 6 - The main categories Pages 8 to 22 - Rene Descarte -The Mind Body Problem Page 24 - Community of inquiry Stimulus Material on

the Mind Body Problem Page 25 - Video Presentation – John Searle Beyond

Dualism Page 26 - Hoopshoot Game on the Mind Body question Page 27 - Bibliography

2

Page 3: Mind/Body Dichotomy

You Tube Introduction to the Mind Body Debate.

Click on the image to the left. You will need to be connected to the internet to view this presentation.

Enlarge to full screen

3

Page 4: Mind/Body Dichotomy

Mind Body Dichotomy

The mind-body dichotomy is the view

that "mental" phenomena are, in some respects, "non-physical" (distinct from the body).

4

Page 5: Mind/Body Dichotomy

Mind Body Dichotomy

In a religious sense, it refers to the separation

of body and soul.

5

Page 6: Mind/Body Dichotomy

Mind Body Dichotomy

Plato argued that, as the body is from the material world, the

soul is from the world of ideas and thus immortal. He believed the soul was temporarily united with the body and would only be separated at death where it would then go back to the world of forms. As the soul does not exist in time and space as the body does, it can therefore access universal truths from the world of ideas.

Dualism - the mind is distinct from the body. Materialism - the mind is an extension of the body

(eg. chemical reactions). Idealism - reality is in the mind. The aim of the soul is to out survive the body where

it will return to the world of ideas, along with the identity of the individual.6

Page 7: Mind/Body Dichotomy

Mind Body Dichotomy

The mind-body dichotomy is the starting point of

Dualism. It became conceptualized its current form in the Western world by

René Descartes's. It also appeared in pre-Aristotelian

concepts.

René Descartes' illustration of mind/body dualism. Inputs are passed on by the sensory organs to the epiphysis in the brain and from there to the immaterial spirit.

7

Page 8: Mind/Body Dichotomy

Meditations II (1641)

The Mind-Body Problem &Descartes’ Psycho-Somatic Dualism

René Descartes(1596-1650 AD)

8

Page 9: Mind/Body Dichotomy

Anthem

9

Page 10: Mind/Body Dichotomy

Three metaphysical perspectives relevant to the “mind-body problem”

10

Page 11: Mind/Body Dichotomy

Metaphysical Dualism: Reality is two-dimensional, partly material and partly non-material (minds, ideas, souls, spirits, consciousness, etc.).

Metaphysical Materialism: Reality is nothing but matter-in-motion-in-space-and-in-time. There are no non-material realities.

Metaphysical Idealism: Reality is nothing but Mind, Idea, Soul, Spirit, Consciousness, etc. Matter does not exist (it’s an illusion?).

11

Page 12: Mind/Body Dichotomy

Application to the “mind-body problem”Metaphysical Materialism: A person is

nothing but a physical organism (body only).

Metaphysical Idealism: A person is “consciousness only” (mind, soul, spirit); not at all a material being.

Metaphysical Dualism: A person is a composite of (1) “mind” (consciousness, intellect, soul, spirit) and (2) body.

12

Page 13: Mind/Body Dichotomy

Cartesian Dualism

I know with certainty THAT “I” exist (Cogito ergo sum), but

WHAT am “I”?Am “I” my body? No, because I can doubt

the existence of my body, whereas I cannot doubt the existence of myself (the “I”).

“I” am a thinking thing, a thing that doubts, understands, affirms, denies, wills, refuses, imagines, and has sensations.

13

Page 14: Mind/Body Dichotomy

Can you doubt the existence of your

body (as well as other physical things)?

Is Descartes right?

Why or why not?14

Page 15: Mind/Body Dichotomy

Bryan Magee, The Great Philosophers (Oxford 1987)

“I can conceive of myself as existing without a body, but I cannot

conceive of myself as existing without conscious awareness.”

15

Page 16: Mind/Body Dichotomy

Descartes' piece of wax(What is this about?)

Detour

D' piece of wax is a physical object.How is it known? Through the senses? Through the power of imagination? Through the intellect (judgement, intuition)?

16

Page 17: Mind/Body Dichotomy

That piece of wax…. A major dispute running through the entire history of

philosophy has to do with the source(s) of human knowledge. There are two major schools: rationalism and empiricism. The empiricists hold that knowledge is derived from sense perception and experience. The rationalists (such as Descartes) hold that knowledge is derived from clear logical thinking, from the intellect (i.e., from "reason").

In the "wax" section, which is a kind of detour from his main argument, Descartes is showing his support of rationalism. He argues that we know - through the intellect - that the wax is and remains what it is as it passes through time and change. Sense perception does not show the "substance" of the wax but only its various appearances. If we relied on sense experience rather than on "reason," then we would "know" that the wax is all of the following: cold and hard, warm and soft, hot and liquid. However, "reason" (not the senses) tells us that the substance (reality) of the wax is something more fundamental than its sensual appearances.

17

Page 18: Mind/Body Dichotomy

my body exists (if it exists at all) outside of my

consciousness and is therefore part of the “external world.”

So…in Descartes’ view,

Thus,

Back to the mind-body problem….

18

Page 19: Mind/Body Dichotomy

Descartes’ mind-body dualism leads to . . . .

19

Page 20: Mind/Body Dichotomy

(1) skepticism concerning the existence & nature of the

“external world”&

(2) the existence of God20

Page 21: Mind/Body Dichotomy

The Mind Body DichotomyThe rejection of the mind-body dichotomy is found in French Structuralism, and is a position that generally characterized post-war French philosophy.

21

Page 22: Mind/Body Dichotomy

Mind Body DichotomyThe absence of an empirically

identifiable meeting point between the non-physical mind and its physical extension has proven problematic to dualism

and many modern philosophers of mind maintain that the mind is not

something separate from the body.

22

Page 23: Mind/Body Dichotomy

Mind Body DichotomyThese approaches have been particularly

influential in the sciencesparticularly in the fields of socio-biology, computer science, evolutionary psychology

and the various neurosciences.

23

Page 24: Mind/Body Dichotomy

A community of Inquiry on the Mind Body Problem

CLICK ON THIS LINK FOR THE STIMULUS FOR A DISCUSSION ABOUT PROBLEMS WITH THE MATERIALIST THEORY OF MIND (You might like to print this material out and distribute it to the class.)

24

Page 25: Mind/Body Dichotomy

You Tube Video Dr John Searle “Beyond Dualism” (Seven part series)

Click on the image to the left. You will need to be connected to the internet to view this presentation.

Enlarge to full screen

25

Page 26: Mind/Body Dichotomy

HoopShoot

Click on the image above for a game of “HoopShoot”. Try playing the game with your students at the start and the end of the unit. Make sure you have started the slide show and are connected to the internet.

26

Page 27: Mind/Body Dichotomy

Bibliography The mind-body problem by Robert M. Young Forming the Mind: Essays on the Internal Senses and the Mind/Body Problem

from Avicenna to the Medical Enlightenment, Springer Science + Business Media, 2007-09-30, ISBN 9781402060830 

Cronk G. Bergen College Website- http://www.bergen.edu/faculty/gcronk/ppts.html

Turner 96, p.76 Kim, J. (1995). Honderich, Ted. ed.. Problems in the Philosophy of Mind.

Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  Pinel, J. Psychobiology, (1990) Prentice Hall, Inc. ISBN 8815071741 LeDoux, J. (2002) The Synaptic Self: How Our Brains Become Who We Are,

New York:Viking Penguin. ISBN 8870787958 Russell, S. and Norvig, P. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, New

Jersey:Prentice Hall. ISBN 0131038052 Dawkins, R. The Selfish Gene (1976) Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN Kim, J., "Mind-Body Problem", Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Ted

Honderich (ed.). Oxford:Oxford University Press. 1995. Wikipedia-Mind Body Dichotomy-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind_body_problem

27